Sess22 to 23
-
Upload
omid-gohari -
Category
Business
-
view
378 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Sess22 to 23
![Page 1: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Communication
The lifeblood of team success
![Page 2: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Communication process
Source Encoding Channel Decoding Receiver
Feedback
![Page 3: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Important forms of communication Oral communication; Non-verbal communication; Written communication.
Actions can impact a receiver more than spoken words (93%).
Nonverbalsymbols
93%
Spoken words7%
![Page 4: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Barriers to effective communication
Hearing instead of listening; Information overload; Selective perception; Using jargons; Dysfunctional emotions; Lack of attention to non-verbal
communication.
![Page 5: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Non-verbal communication
Body language: (1) the extent to which an individual
likes another and interested in their views;
(2) the relative perceived status between a sender and a receiver.
Eye contact 10% of the time with Asians; 75% of the time with Americans; 100% of the time with the French.
Facial expression;
Physical distance and space.
![Page 7: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Physical distance and space
Public zone (over 3.6m)
Social zone (1.2-3.6m)
Intimate zone (15-46cm)
Personal zone (46cm-1.2m)
![Page 8: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Shared mental models and team learning
![Page 9: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mental models
Mental models can be thought of as knowledge structures, images, assumptions, beliefs, and attitudes in an individual’s cognitions.
Mental models such as belief systems, implicit theories, and assumptions affect our reasoning and behaviour.
![Page 10: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mental models in teams
Cannon-Bowers and colleagues (1993) have proposed one of the most popular conceptual framework for different types of mental models in the context of teamwork.
They considered mental models to be multidimensional, and categorised multiple mental models into four types.
![Page 11: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Types of mental models
equipment models: equipment functioning and limitations, technologies
task model: procedures, strategies, environmental constraints
team interaction model: roles, responsibilities, expectations
team model: team members’ knowledge and skills, attitudes, beliefs, and preferences
![Page 12: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Shared mental model
Shared mental model (or shared cognition) may improve and facilitate group work and coordination and may result in high group performance and effectiveness.
![Page 13: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What does “shared” mean?
Two approaches have been proposed to conceptualise shared mental models:
the similarities of members’ mental models (Cannon-Bowers & Salas, 2001).
In addition to similarity, the extent to which group
members are familiar with each other’s mental models and their differences and similarities (Klimoski & Mohammed, 1994; Kraiger & Wenzel, 1997).
![Page 14: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How to develop shared mental models?
Job rotation and cross-training Team training Role playing Team learning activities
![Page 15: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Team learning
Two important team skills for team learning:
Reflection refers to “slowing down our thinking processes to become more aware of how we form our mental models” (Senge et al., 1994, p. 237).
Inquiry refers to “holding conversations where we openly share views and develop knowledge about each other’s assumptions” (p. 237).
![Page 16: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Team learning and developing shared mental models
learning as modifying mental models and developing shared mental models needs openness to oneself and to other team members (Gibson, 2001).
dialogue is a vital process for group learning, and distinct from discussion.
![Page 17: Sess22 to 23](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082803/5457fe6aaf795998788b52fc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Readings
Please read from page 306 to 328 of the text book.