Seri Indian traditional knowledge and molecular biology ...labs.eeb.utoronto.ca/murphy/PDFs of...
Transcript of Seri Indian traditional knowledge and molecular biology ...labs.eeb.utoronto.ca/murphy/PDFs of...
ORIGINALARTICLE
Seri Indian traditional knowledge andmolecular biology agree: no express trainfor island-hopping spiny-tailed iguanasin the Sea of Cortes
Christina M. Davy1,2*, Fausto R. Mendez de la Cruz3, Amy Lathrop2 and
Robert W. Murphy1,2,4
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Wilcocks
Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada,2Department of Natural History, Royal
Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto,
ON M5S 2C6, Canada, 3Laboratorio de
Herpetologıa, Instituto de Biologıa,
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico,
AP 70-153, CP 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico,4State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and
Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming
650223, China
*Correspondence: Christina M. Davy,
c/o Department of Natural History, Royal
Ontario Museum, 100 Queens Park, Toronto,
ON M5S 2C6, Canada.
E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Aim The role of human activities in species biogeography can be difficult to
identify, but in some cases molecular techniques can be used to test hypotheses of
human-mediated dispersal. A currently accepted hypothesis states that humans
mediated the divergence of two species of spiny-tailed iguanas in the Ctenosaura
hemilopha species complex, namely C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis, which
occupy islands in the Sea of Cortes between the peninsula of Baja California and
mainland Mexico. We test an alternative hypothesis that follows the traditional
knowledge of the Seri Indians and states that the divergence of these species was
not mediated by humans.
Location Mexico, including Baja California, Sonoran and Sinaloan coastal
regions, and Isla San Esteban and Isla San Pedro Nolasco in the Sea of Cortes.
Methods We analysed mitochondrial (cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase
subunit III) DNA sequences from four species in the C. hemilopha species
complex. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference were used to infer
matriarchal genealogical relationships between the species and several outgroup
taxa. Bayesian methods were used to estimate divergence times for the major
nodes on the trees based on previously published, fossil-calibrated priors.
Results Our analysis indicated that lineages within the C. hemilopha species
complex diverged long before human colonization of the Americas. The
divergence of C. nolascensis and C. conspicuosa could not be attributed to Seri
translocations. The matriarchal genealogy of the species complex currently defies
a simple biogeographical interpretation.
Main conclusions We conclude that humans did not mediate the divergence of
C. nolascensis and C. conspicuosa. This conclusion is consistent with the
traditional knowledge of the Seri people. These results demonstrate the utility
of molecular techniques in investigating potential cases of human-mediated
dispersal of plants and animals, and reinforce the importance of considering
traditional knowledge in the formation of scientific hypotheses and the
interpretation of results.
Keywords
Baja California, Ctenosaura conspicuosa, Ctenosaura hemilopha, Ctenosaura
nolascensis, genealogy, human-mediated dispersal, Iguanidae, island biogeo-
graphy, molecular clock, reptiles.
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2011) 38, 272–284
272 www.blackwellpublishing.com/jbi ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltddoi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02422.x
INTRODUCTION
Untangling the historical causes of the geographic distributions
of species or species complexes is central to the study of
biogeography. However, the factors that are responsible for
current species distributions cannot always be directly inferred
from available data. For example, historical climatic conditions
are often difficult to determine, although these may explain
current species ranges and distributions. Likewise, the geolog-
ical history of many areas is not completely understood; it may
not be ‘written in stone’ (e.g. Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002;
Riddle et al., 2008). Human impacts on species distributions
must also be considered, because humans have both deliber-
ately and accidentally mediated the dispersal of many plants
and animals (e.g. Austin, 1999; Nabhan, 2002; Carlton, 2003).
In this study we use molecular techniques to investigate
whether or not human-mediated translocations played a role
in the evolutionary history of an iguanid species complex in
the Sea of Cortes.
The Cape spiny-tailed iguana (Ctenosaura hemilopha Cope,
1863) species complex (Squamata, Iguanidae) is found in the
southern part of the Baja Californian peninsula, on mainland
Mexico (Sonora and Sinaloa), and on several islands in the Sea
of Cortes (Smith, 1935; Lowe & Norris, 1955; Fig. 1). Colour
pattern variability and other morphological attributes among
individuals from these isolated locations led Smith (1972) to
recognize five geographically isolated subspecies, four of which
Grismer (1999) elevated to full species level. Ctenosaura
hemilopha occurs on the southern half of the peninsula of
Baja California, and C. h. insulana is found on Isla Cerralvo,
c. 8.73 km from the peninsula (Murphy et al., 2002). Cten-
osaura macrolopha (Grismer, 1999) is found on the Mexican
mainland, from Hermosillo, Sonora, southwards to mid-
Sinaloa. Ctenosaura nolascensis (Grismer, 1999) is restricted to
Isla San Pedro Nolasco, a small island c. 14.61 km off the coast
near Guaymas, Sonora (Murphy et al., 2002). Finally, Cten-
osaura conspicuosa (Grismer, 1999) occurs only on Isla San
Esteban and the neighbouring Isla Cholludo (also referred to as
Isla Lobos, e.g. Smith, 1972). Isla Cholludo is located near the
southernmost point of Isla Tiburon (Fig. 1), and it was
connected to this island and mainland Mexico at times of
maximum glaciation in the Pleistocene. The oceanic islands in
the Sea of Cortes are estimated to have uplifted between 5 and
2 Ma (Carreno & Helenes, 2002). Some of these islands have
never been connected to the mainland, and Isla San Esteban
may be one of these (Carreno & Helenes, 2002). Thus, the
occurrence of C. conspicuosa on Isla San Esteban, and the
distribution of this species complex in general, is a biogeo-
graphical conundrum.
Bailey (1928) suggested that C. conspicuosa on Isla San
Esteban ‘were in all probability carried there by man’. When
Smith (1972) later described the taxon, he suggested that the
insular populations were founded by individuals from the
peninsula of Baja California, as ‘a few waif populations in a
24o
28o
32o
30o
26o
117o 113o 111o 107o109o115o
0 100 200
km
N
2, 34
18, 19
5
29-36
112.6o 112.5o
29.6o
29.7o
112.4o112.3o
Isla Datil
Isla Tiburon
Isla Cholludo
Isla San Esteban
0 5 10
km
13,1420-24
1
7
6
25-28
see inset
Figure 1 Distribution of the Ctenosaura
hemilopha species complex, with arrows
indicating Isla San Esteban and Isla San
Pedro Nolasco. The location of Isla Cholludo
is indicated in the inset. Numbers indicate
samples included in the analysis (see Table 1
for sample details). Shaded areas indicate the
ranges of C. hemilopha (dotted line) and
C. macrolopha (dashed line). Samples 1–6,
C. hemilopha; 13, 14, 20–24, C. conspicuosa; 7,
18, 19, 25–28, C. macrolopha; 29–36,
C. nolascensis.
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 273ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
sweepstake pattern reached a number of the Gulf Islands’.
Grismer (1994, 2002) further considered the hypothesis that
the indigenous culture in and around the Sea of Cortes
mediated the dispersal of Ctenosaura sp. (presumably
C. nolascensis) from Isla San Pedro Nolasco to Isla San Esteban.
Nabhan (2003) documented in detail the complex cultural
relationship between the Seri (Comcaac) people indigenous to
the Sea of Cortes and the native reptiles of the region. Many
Seri recognize snakes, lizards, tortoises and marine turtles by
species, and some species have more than one common name
in the Comcaac language. Each species has a cultural signif-
icance to the Seri. Some may be included in feasts at important
celebrations; for example, marine turtles are served during
coming-of-age ceremonies. Some are avoided; for example, the
Seri believe that looking at certain lizards can cause a pregnant
woman to miscarry (Nabhan, 2003).
Along with the cultural importance of the Seri’s relationship
with reptiles, Seri oral history contains information about
historical translocations of reptiles. Nabhan (2002, 2003)
documented Seri accounts of the deliberate translocation of
chuckwallas (Sauromalus) between islands in the Sea of Cortes.
Chuckwallas are an important source of food for the Seri
(Nabhan, 2003). Both molecular evidence and Seri traditional
knowledge suggest that the Seri were responsible for trans-
locating Sauromalus hispidus from Isla Angel de la Guarda
southwards to Isla San Lorenzo Sur, and probably also to Isla
San Lorenzo Norte and Islote Granito (Petren & Case, 1997,
2002; Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002). Seri involvement is also
implicated in the dispersal of several other reptilian species
throughout the Gulf islands, including side-blotched lizards,
which probably dispersed as hitchhikers (Uta; Upton &
Murphy, 1997), and giant chuckwallas (Sauromalus varius;
Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002), which were probably trans-
located deliberately (Nabhan, 2003). Human translocations
have also mediated the dispersal and subsequent divergence of
lizards in other parts of the world. For example, molecular data
demonstrate how Lipinia noctua ‘took the express train’ to
distant Polynesian islands by hitchhiking with humans
dispersing out of Melanesia (Austin, 1999).
Could translocations by the Seri explain the peculiar
occurrence of C. conspicuosa on the islands of San Esteban
and Cholludo, which are so far north of the other insular
Ctenosaura and surrounded by islands on which Ctenosaura
are not found? The Seri people hunt spiny-tailed iguanas
(Nabhan, 2003), so it would have benefited them to move
Ctenosaura species to islands on which they lived or hunted.
They have successfully translocated and established new
populations of other iguanid lizards, as evidenced by their
translocations of Sauromalus and other reptiles, and they have
an oral history of the translocation of C. conspicuosa from Isla
San Esteban to nearby Isla Cholludo. However, Isla San
Esteban itself is located far to the north of the other insular
species of Ctenosaura (Fig. 1) and is isolated from other
populations of Ctenosaura. The occurrence of C. conspicuosa
on Isla San Esteban is, therefore, more difficult to explain.
When Nabhan (2003) directly asked a Seri elder if his people
had translocated Ctenosaura from Isla San Pedro Nolasco to
Isla San Esteban, the response was that, although it was
certainly possible, they had no history of such a translocation.
When translocating animals for live food, the Seri have a
practice of breaking the legs of lizards in order to prevent
escape (Nabhan, 2003), which makes accidental introductions
unlikely (although not impossible).
Recent translocations are unlikely to be detectable mor-
phologically. For example, translocated populations of chuc-
kwallas cannot be morphologically distinguished based on
their place of origin. In contrast, phenotypic distinctions
between C. conspicuosa on Isla San Esteban and C. nolascensis
on Isla San Pedro Nolasco have been listed by Grismer
(1999). These include the presence of small black spots on
the ventral surface of the hind limbs of adult C. nolascensis,
while C. conspicuosa, C. macrolopha and C. hemilopha have
large circular blotches. In C. nolascensis, the dorsal hind limb
pattern is mottled, while in C. conspicuosa it is banded.
Hatchling coloration tends to differ between the populations
as well, although less consistently than adult coloration
(Grismer, 1999). Consistent differences in coloration between
these two populations (Smith, 1972; Grismer, 1999) imply
prolonged reproductive isolation, which is inconsistent with
ongoing human translocation of individuals between recently
diverged populations. Overall, the evidence for human-
mediated dispersal of Ctenosaura to Isla San Esteban is
currently equivocal. In the case of Sauromalus, molecular
evidence helped to confirm Seri translocations, but such
evidence is lacking for the C. hemilopha complex.
To date, the sole genetic analysis of the C. hemilopha species
complex, an MSc thesis (Cryder, 1999), suggested a genealogy
based on 22 cytochrome b (cyt b) and cytochrome c oxidase
subunit III (COIII) sequences (Fig. 2). Grismer (2002) cited
Cryder’s genealogy and the morphological variation between
species (Grismer, 1999) as evidence that the Seri people had
‘created’ C. conspicuosa by moving C. nolascensis from Isla San
Pedro Nolasco to Isla San Esteban. Grismer (2002) also cited
Nabhan’s (2003) ethno-herpetological study of the Seri culture
as evidence for Seri translocation of Ctenosaura from Isla San
Pedro Nolasco to Isla San Esteban.
The question of Seri involvement has not yet been
adequately addressed. The Seri elders cited by Grismer
(2002) did not, in fact, claim an oral history of Ctenosaura
translocations between those two islands (Nabhan, 2003). The
practice of breaking the legs of lizards being transported for
food makes accidental translocations unlikely. Equally prob-
lematic, Cryder’s (1999) phylogenetic results (Fig. 2) do not
show the topology expected under the hypothesis of the
translocation of Ctenosaura from Isla San Pedro Nolasco to Isla
San Esteban. Recent divergence between young species or
diverging populations typically manifests in genealogies as
incomplete lineage sorting (e.g. Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002;
Morando et al., 2004; Heckman et al., 2007). In contrast to
this prediction, Cryder’s (1999) genealogy showed that the
four species and the one subspecies form distinct lineages. The
exception was C. nolascensis, which had two independent
C. M. Davy et al.
274 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
maternal lineages, both of which were resolved and neither of
which nested within another species.
We used mtDNA sequences to test the hypothesis suggested
by Bailey (1928) and Grismer (2002) that the Seri people
founded the population of C. conspicuosa on Isla San Esteban
by translocating C. nolascensis from Isla San Pedro Nolasco.
Acceptance of this hypothesis requires that the divergence of
the separate species lineages occurred after the first known
human colonization of the Americas (c. 16,500 years ago;
Goebel et al., 2008). We inferred the relationships between
maternal lineages of the C. hemilopha species complex using
standard phylogenetic methods, and used Bayesian inference
(BI) to estimate divergence times between the species. Rejec-
tion of the hypothesis requires that estimated divergence times
between the species occurred before human colonization of the
Americas, and that there is no evidence of incomplete lineage
sorting between matrilines sampled within the ranges of
C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Because the sequences obtained by Cryder (1999) were not
available in GenBank, we resampled the four species. Phyloge-
netic analysis of mtDNA was assumed to produce a genealogy
of maternal lineages that closely reflects the evolutionary
history of the species in question (e.g. Upton & Murphy, 1997).
To produce a mtDNA genealogy for the C. hemilopha complex,
we examined mitochondrial cyt b and COIII sequences from 31
individual Ctenosaura representing the four recognized species
in the C. hemilopha complex. Where possible, we attempted to
sample from a number of locations within the range of each
species in order to avoid a geographic sampling bias. The
subspecies C. h. insulana was not included owing to sampling
restrictions. We also collected tissues from the Mexican spiny-
tailed iguana (C. pectinata Wiegmann) in Sinaloa (near
Chametla, Culiacan and Mazatlan) as an outgroup taxon.
Previously, this iguanid was shown to be closely related to the
C. hemilopha complex (Kohler et al., 2000). As more distant
outgroups we included sequences from Petrosaurus thalassinus
Cope collected in Baja California, Iguana iguana Linnaeus taken
from GenBank, and Sauromalus ater Dumeril collected from
Sonora (near Sonoyta and Caborca). Petrosaurus thalassinus
was specified as the most distant outgroup whenever required.
GenBank accession numbers and voucher specimen informa-
tion for all individuals are listed in Table 1.
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
We isolated total genomic DNA from frozen or 95% ethanol-
preserved tissues using standard proteinase K digestion
followed by phenol-chloroform extraction (Sambrook et al.,
1989). Cyt b and COIII were amplified using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) (Saiki et al., 1988). DNA amplification and
purification followed the methods of Blair et al. (2009), using
the primers and primer-specific annealing temperatures listed
in Table 2. Sequencing reactions were performed on a Gene-
Amp 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,
USA), using the BigDye Terminator v 3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit
(Applied Biosystems). Sequences were visualized on an ABI 377
automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
C. nolascensis Isla San Pedro Nolasco
C. conspicuosa
C. conspicuosa
Isla San Esteban
C. macrolopha
Isla Cholludo
C. nolascensis
C. hemilopha
C. hemilopha
Sonora
Isla San Pedro Nolasco
Baja California
Isla Cerralvo
Figure 2 Genealogy of the matrilines of the
Ctenosaura hemilopha species complex
inferred by Cryder (1999) from cytochrome b
and cytochrome c oxidase subunit III
sequences using maximum parsimony
methods (redrawn from Grismer, 2002).
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 275ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Alignment and sequence analysis
We sequenced 1632 base pairs combined from COIII and
cyt b for 49 individuals. Sequences were aligned with
ClustalW (Larkin et al., 2007) and subsequently checked
by eye. Conversion to amino acids confirmed the align-
ment. We calculated the percentage sequence divergence
(uncorrected p-distances) for all ingroup taxa based on
Table 1 Sample details for iguanid lizards
included in this study. Sample ID numbers
correspond to the ID numbers on the trees
and in Fig. 1. Where vouchers were taken,
ROM accession numbers are designated (i.e.
‘ROM xxxx’). If vouchers were not taken, the
field number corresponding to the tissue
sample is indicated.
Species Sample ID
Voucher
number/Field
number
GenBank
accession no.
(cyt b)
GenBank
accession no.
(COIII)
Ctenosaura hemilopha CH1 ROM 26795 HQ141246 HQ141198
CH2 RWM 2280 HQ141251 HQ141203
CH3 RWM 2282 HQ141247 HQ141199
CH4 RWM 623 HQ141248 HQ141200
CH5 RWM 631 HQ141249 HQ141201
CH6 RWM 879 HQ141250 HQ141202
C. macrolopha CH7 JRO 645 HQ141235 HQ141187
CH18 ROM 38003 HQ141268 HQ141220
CH19 ROM 38004 HQ141267 HQ141219
CH25 ROM 38021 HQ141236 HQ141188
CH26 ROM 38022 HQ141237 HQ141189
CH27 ROM 38023 HQ141238 HQ141190
CH28 ROM 38024 HQ141239 HQ141191
CH37 ROM 38037 HQ141231 HQ141183
CH38 ROM 38038 HQ141232 HQ141184
CH39 ROM 38039 HQ141233 HQ141185
C. conspicuosa CH13 KP-EC102 HQ141252 HQ141204
CH14 KP-EC103 HQ141253 HQ141205
CH 20 ROM 38011 HQ141254 HQ141206
CH21 ROM 38012 HQ141255 HQ141207
CH22 ROM 38013 HQ141256 HQ141208
CH23 ROM 38014 HQ141257 HQ141209
CH24 ROM 38015 HQ141258 HQ141210
C. nolascensis CH29 ROM 38028 HQ141240 HQ141192
CH30 ROM 38029 HQ141271 HQ141223
CH31 ROM 38030 HQ141272 HQ141224
CH32 ROM 38031 HQ141273 HQ141225
CH33 ROM 38032 HQ141274 HQ141226
CH34 ROM 38033 HQ141275 HQ141227
CH35 ROM 38034 HQ141276 HQ141228
CH36 ROM 38035 HQ141277 HQ141229
Petrosaurus thalassinus Petrosaurus RWM 2263 HQ141230 HQ141182
Iguana iguana Iguana GenBank AJ278511.2 AJ278511.2
Sauromalus ater S1 KP-20 HQ141242 HQ141194
S2 KP-22a HQ141243 HQ141195
S3 KP-22b HQ141244 HQ141196
S4 KP-19 HQ141241 HQ141193
S5 KP-21 HQ141245 HQ141197
C. pectinata CP1 ROM 38001 HQ141269 HQ141221
CP2 ROM 38002 HQ141270 HQ141222
CP3 ROM 38040 HQ141234 HQ141186
CP4 ROM 38041 HQ141259 HQ141211
CP5 ROM 38042 HQ141260 HQ141212
CP6 ROM 38043 HQ141261 HQ141213
CP7 ROM 38044 HQ141262 HQ141214
CP8 ROM 38045 HQ141263 HQ141215
CP9 ROM 38046 HQ141264 HQ141216
CP10 ROM 38047 HQ141265 HQ141217
CP11 ROM 38050 HQ141266 HQ141218
Cyt b, cytochrome b; COIII, cytochrome c oxidase subunit III.
C. M. Davy et al.
276 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
uncorrected p-distances as implemented in mega 4 (Tamura
et al., 2007).
Because direct comparison of our sampled sequences with
those of Cryder (1999) was not possible, we initially followed
his methods in order to determine if any inherent differences
between the two data sets might have caused our genealogy to
differ in topology from his (Fig. 2). Thus, maximum parsi-
mony (MP) analysis was implemented in paup* 4.0b10
(Swofford, 2002), employing a heuristic search with 50
random addition sequences (RAS) and tree bisection–recon-
nection branch swapping. We then assessed nodal confidence
for the MP strict consensus tree by nonparametric bootstrap-
ping (Felsenstein, 1985) using a heuristic search with 1000
pseudoreplicates, 50 RAS per pseudoreplicate, and nearest-
neighbour interchange branch swapping (Nei & Kumar, 2000).
We considered bootstrap values > 70 to indicate strong nodal
support (Hillis & Bull, 1993).
We used MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, 2001;
Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) to determine the most
probable evolutionary history for the matrilines based on the
available sequences. MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander, 2004)
indicated that the best-fit evolutionary model for our data
was (GTR+I+C), which was selected for each gene using the
Akaike information criterion (Akaike, 1974, 1979). To
account for potential rate variation and differing rates of
substitution between the two genes (Nylander, 2004; Brandley
et al., 2005), we partitioned our data set by gene, and set the
analysis to account for variable rates between partitions using
the command prset applyto = (all) ratepr = variable in
MrBayes.
The Bayesian analysis was run for 1 · 105 generations, with
two simultaneous runs of six chains sampled at 100-generation
intervals. The first 2500 trees (25%) were discarded as burn-in,
and the inferred genealogy was based on 7500 data points.
Examination of the raw trace, the log-likelihood plot and the
standard deviations of the split frequencies all indicated that
convergence had occurred, and that the burn-in period was
sufficient. We considered lineages to have significant support if
they had posterior probability values ‡ 0.95 (Felsenstein,
2004).
Estimates of divergence time
It is not advisable to estimate divergence times for nodes in a
tree without at least one point of geological or palaeonto-
logical reference, and preferably several (Benton & Ayala,
2003; Reisz & Muller, 2004). Robust estimations of diver-
gence dates require several points of reference, preferably
from fossil evidence. Unfortunately, the fossil record for
iguanid lizards in western Mexico is scarce, and it is therefore
not possible to date the evolution of the C. hemilopha species
complex by dating fossils of these species. Therefore, we base
our estimates of divergence time within the C. hemilopha
complex on the divergence time (most recent common
ancestor, MRCA) of C. pectinata and C. hemilopha estimated
by Zarza et al. (2008). Using a Bayesian approach and
calibration points based on fossil evidence, they estimate that
the divergence of C. pectinata and C. hemilopha occurred
9.24 Ma (SD = 2.9), and that divergence within C. pectinata
began between 2.3 and 6.5 Ma (Zarza et al., 2008). We use
these priors in our analysis.
We used the program beast 1.4.2 (Drummond et al., 2007)
to infer divergence times for species of the C. hemilopha
complex under an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed molecular
clock model (Drummond et al., 2006). Input files were created
with BEAUti 1.4.2 (Drummond et al., 2007), and manually
edited to partition the data by gene and to specify substitution
rates, gamma shape parameters and proportion of invariable
sites for each partition based on the estimates made in
MrModeltest. We specified monophyly of the lineages
identified by our BI analysis but did not specify an input tree.
beast analyses considered the Yule process tree prior, as
recommended for analyses of speciation (Drummond et al.,
2007). Three Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were
made, each with 3 · 107 generations, sampling every 100
generations with a burn-in period of 10% of the samples.
Table 2 Primers used to amplify and sequence cytochrome b (cyt b) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit III (COIII) from the Ctenosaura
hemilopha species complex, C. pectinata, Sauromalus ater and Petrosaurus thalassinus.
Target gene
Primer/annealing
temperature Sequence (5¢–3¢) Source
Cyt b GLUDG-L
50 �C
TGACTTGAARAACCAYCGTTG Palumbi et al. (1991)
CTEN-8H
50 �C
TTACTGTGGCGCCTCGGAAGGATATTTGGCCTCA Cryder (1999)
COIII L8618CO3
46 �C
CATGATAACACATAATGACCCACCAA Cryder (1999)
H9323CO3
46 �C
ACTACGTCTACGAAATGTCAGTATCA Cryder (1999)
Petrosaurus and Sauromalus cyt b
Cyt b B1L CCATCCAACATCTCAGCATGATGAAA Kocher et al. (1989)
Cyt b B6H
50 �C
GTCTTCAGTTTTTGGTTTACAAGAC Tim Birt (Queens University, pers. comm.)
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 277ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
We examined output files for each of the three runs in
Tracer (Rambaut & Drummond, 2007) to assess whether or
not they had converged on similar estimates of divergence
times. Next, we combined the results of the runs using
LogCombiner (Drummond et al., 2007) for further analysis,
sampling the combined runs every 300 generations for a final
sample of 89,991,300 states with a burn-in of 10% of the
samples. We considered effective sample size (ESS) values
> 200 to indicate good mixing and a valid estimate of
continuous parameters and likelihoods given the specified
priors (Drummond et al., 2007). We checked the distribution
of the standard deviation of the uncorrelated lognormal relaxed
clock model and its coefficient of variation in Tracer during
examination of the output files. Neither parameter approached
zero, indicating rate variation between branches and suggesting
that a strict clock would have been an inappropriate model for
our data. The maximum clade credibility tree for the combined
runs was computed using TreeAnnotator 1.4.7 (Drummond
et al., 2007). We used the estimated lower bound of the 95%
highest posterior density (HPD) region of the MRCA param-
eters to test the hypothesis that C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis
could have diverged as a result of human-mediated dispersal,
that is, after human colonization of the Americas
(c. 16,500 years ago; Goebel et al., 2008).
RESULTS
Sequence analysis
Average percentage sequence divergences (p-distances) within
and between C. pectinata and species in the C. hemilopha
complex are summarized in Table 3. Sequence divergence
between C. pectinata and the C. hemilopha species complex
averaged 11.2%. Divergence between lineages within the
C. hemilopha species complex ranged from 0.8% to 4.5%,
with the highest percentage divergence occurring between two
lineages in C. nolascensis.
Of 1632 nucleotide sites, 547 were variable and 378 were
potentially phylogenetically informative. Within the sequences
from C. hemilopha and C. pectinata (excluding other out-
groups), 241 sites were potentially phylogenetically informative.
The MP analysis recovered 2111 most-parsimonious trees of
925 steps (consistency index = 0.765, retention index = 0.943).
The topologies of the MP strict consensus tree and the BI
majority-rule consensus tree differed slightly at the tips. The
trees also differed in their placement of Ctenosaura in relation
to the three outgroup genera, but both methods inferred the
same relationships between the five species of Ctenosaura, and
resolved the same major lineages within Ctenosaura, without
exception (Fig. 3). Six major mtDNA lineages were recovered.
Ctenosaura pectinata formed a distinct lineage distantly related
to the C. hemilopha complex. Ctenosaura nolascensis was
resolved into two distinct and distantly related lineages. The
first of these lineages (C. nolascensis-1) was resolved as sister to
a single sample of C. macrolopha from Culiacan, Sinaloa, and
this group was resolved as sister to C. conspicuosa from Isla San
Esteban. The remaining samples of C. nolascensis formed a
separate lineage (C. nolascensis-2), sister to a lineage containing
both C. hemilopha and C. macrolopha. There was high
bootstrap and posterior probability support for most nodes
between species (Fig. 3).
Our genealogy recovered the same mtDNA groups as Cryder
(1999), but differed slightly in the relationships between
C. nolascensis-2, C. hemilopha and C. macrolopha. Otherwise,
our genealogies agreed on the relationship between the
matrilines. Interestingly, the proportion of the two C. nolasc-
ensis haplotypes in our sample (5:3) approximates that shown
in Fig. 2 (3:2; Cryder, 1999). Based on the sample from
Culiacan (CH19), which was resolved as sister to the
C. nolascensis-1 lineage, C. macrolopha did not consist of a
single matrilineal lineage but contained at least two distinct
matrilines. Finally, the tree topology and p-distances indicated
that the degree of divergence between C. conspicuosa and
C. nolascensis-1 was comparable to the divergence between
C. macrolopha and C. hemilopha (Table 4).
Estimates of divergence time
Estimated divergence times within the major lineages and the
95% HPD of the estimates are summarized in Table 4.
Estimated divergence times for all major nodes are also shown
on the maximum clade credibility tree generated by
TreeAnnotator from the three combined MCMC runs
(Fig. 4). The estimated divergence time for the matrilines
within C. conspicuosa was 1.73 Ma, with a lower 95% HPD
of 326,200 years ago. Divergence between the C. nolascensis-1
Table 3 Average pairwise genetic divergence (percentage uncorrected p-distances) within and between Ctenosaura pectinata, C. hemilopha,
C. macrolopha, C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis. The two matrilines within C. nolascensis are presented separately. The standard error of
percentage divergence is indicated in parentheses.
C. pectinata C. conspicuosa C. nolascensis-1 C. nolascensis-2 C. hemilopha C. macrolopha
C. pectinata 0.9 (± 0.2)
C. conspicuosa 11.1 (± 1.2) 0.1 (± 0.1)
C. nolascensis-1 11.2 (± 1.2) 0.8 (± 0.2) 0.0 (± 0.1)
C. nolascensis-2 11.2 (± 0.012) 4.0 (± 0.6) 4.5 (± 0.2) 0.0 (± 0.0)
C. hemilopha 11.3 (± 1.2) 3.9 (± 0.6) 4.0 (± 0.6) 1.1 (± 0.3) 0.0 (± 0.0)
C. macrolopha 11.3 (± 1.2) 4.3 (± 0.6) 1.5 (± 0.6) 1.5 (± 0.3) 0.9(± 0.2) 0.1 (± 0.0)
C. M. Davy et al.
278 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
C.h. 36C.h. 13C.h. 20
P. thalassinusC.h. 19C.h. 30
C.h. 32C.h. 35
C.h. 31
C.h. 24
C.h. 6
C.h. 22C.h. 23C.h. 1
C.h. 4C.h. 5
C.h. 3
C.h. 21C.h. 14
C.h. 2C.h. 37
C.h. 39C.h. 26
C.h. 38
C.h. 33C.h. 34C.p. 3
C.h. 7C.h. 25C.h. 27
C.h. 18C.h. 29
C.h. 28
C.p. 1C.p. 2
C.p. 4
I. iguana
C.p. 11C.p. 5C.p. 6
C.p. 10C.p. 8
C.p. 7
C.p. 9S4S2
S5S1
S3
1.0/97
0.93/100
*
*
*
*
*
0.92/77
1.0/91
0.93/98
0.75/86 0.97/64
1.0/99
1.0/93
0.93/63
1.0/99
0.64/58
0.55
0.98/85
0.65
0.59/61
0.961.0/91
0.68
0.96/51
C. macrolopha
C. conspicuosa
C. hemilopha
C. macrolopha
C. nolascensis-2
C. nolascensis-1
C. pectinata
Figure 3 Evolutionary history of the matri-
lines of the Ctenosaura hemilopha complex
inferred using Bayesian inference analysis of
cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase
subunit III sequence data. C.h., Ctenosaura
hemilopha complex; C.p., C. pectinata;
S, Sauromalus ater. Numbers at nodes indi-
cate Bayesian posterior probability values
followed by the percentage of replicate trees
in which the associated taxa clustered
together in the nonparametric bootstrap
analysis; * indicates a posterior probability/
bootstrap proportion = 1.0/100.
Table 4 Estimated dates of divergence from
the most recent common ancestor (MRCA)
between the major matrilines within the
Ctenosaura hemilopha species complex. Dates
(Ma) were estimated under an uncorrelated
relaxed clock model in beast, with the
analysis partitioned by gene and priors as
described in the Materials and Methods.
Mean estimated divergence dates are listed,
with the upper and lower bounds of the 95%
highest posterior density (HPD) of each
estimate.
MRCA Mean (Ma) 95% HPD upper 95% HPD lower
Between lineages
(hemilopha/macrolopha)
+ nolascensis-2
3.6723 6.7291 1.2188
hemilopha + macrolopha 2.7318 5.162 0.7606
conspicuosa + nolascensis-1 2.9032 5.5111 0.8421
nolascensis-1 + CH19
(C. macrolopha)
1.5714 3.3261 0.2287
Within lineages
pectinata 3.5842 5.6412 2.3001
hemilopha 1.3676 3.0473 0.1667
macrolopha 1.6646 3.4142 0.3553
conspicuosa 1.7283 3.6096 0.3367
nolascensis-1* 0.7433 1.807 0.0447
nolascensis-2 1.2582 3.1166 0.504
*Excluding the sample of C. macrolopha from Culiacan (CH19), which was resolved as sister to
this lineage.
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 279ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
and C. conspicuosa matrilines was estimated at 2.9 Ma
(5.5–0.8421 Ma). The most recent divergence occurred bet-
ween the matrilines within C. nolascensis-1 (1.8–0.0447 Ma).
DISCUSSION
Genealogies for the C. hemilopha complex and estimates of
divergence time between the species in the complex suggest
that historical human involvement in their divergence is highly
unlikely. We cannot refute the null hypothesis that C. conspic-
uosa diverged from the other taxa in the C. hemilopha complex
before humans arrived in North America, and we cannot
accept Seri translocation as the explanation for the presence
of C. conspicuosa on Isla San Esteban. Although this conclusion
differs from some previous interpretations, it is in agreement
with Seri traditional knowledge (Nabhan, 2002, 2003).
Ctenosaura hemilopha, C. macrolopha, C. nolascensis and
C. conspicuosa show no evidence of recent female dispersal
and gene flow between them, although there are interesting
patterns present in the genealogy, as we discuss below. The
occurrence of a C. nolascensis-like haplotype on the mainland
is especially intriguing and suggests historical dispersal
between Isla San Pedro Nolasco and the mainland. Our
conclusion leaves us in need of a new biogeographical
explanation for the distribution of the C. hemilopha
species complex.
No ‘express train’ for C. conspicuosa
The hypothesis that Seri translocations caused the initial
divergence between the insular species of Ctenosaura requires
the divergence of the matrilines found on the two islands to
occur after c. 16,500 years ago (Goebel et al., 2008), but the
estimated divergence time between the insular matrilines of
C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis-1 is, at a minimum, 0.84 Ma
(Table 4). Consequently, the molecular data do not support
the theory that the Seri (or any other human culture) mediated
the initial divergence of C. nolascensis and C. conspicuosa.
This finding is unlikely to surprise the Seri, whose oral
histories do not include such a translocation (Nabhan, 2003).
As discussed earlier, the Seri’s reptilian translocations show
deliberation and planning. Details of other translocations
C.h. 14C.h. 20C.h. 13
C.h. 19C.h. 32C.h. 35
C.h. 31C.h. 36
C.h. 30
C.h. 21
C.h. 3
C.h. 22C.h. 2C.h. 4
C.h. 5C.h. 6
C.h. 1
C.h. 24C.h. 23
C.h. 7C.h. 38
C.h. 25C.h. 27
C.h. 28
C.h. 29C.p. 5C.p. 6
C.h. 37C.h. 18C.h. 26
C.h. 33C.h. 34
C.h. 39
C.p. 7C.p. 2
C.p. 10
I. iguana
C.p. 1C.p. 4C.p. 3
C.p. 8C.p. 9
C.p. 11
C. macrolopha
C. conspicuosa
C. hemilopha
C. macrolopha
C. nolascensis-2
C. nolascensis-1
C. pectinata
10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
1.57
0.742.90
1.73 0.41
0.26
5.171.37
2.73
1.66
1.29
3.67
0.39
0.451.26
0.52
1.560.7
0.251.14
3.58
1.01
9.27
7.93
*
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
Figure 4 Chronogram of the Ctenosaura
hemilopha species complex: maximum clade
credibility tree from three combined Markov
chain Monte Carlo analyses performed in
beast. Ctenosaura pectinata and Iguana ig-
uana are included as outgroups. Posterior
estimates of divergence times were inferred
by partitioning analyses by gene, and placing
constraints on the divergence dates of two
nodes (see Materials and Methods). Values at
nodes indicate posterior mean ages (Ma), and
node bars represent the 95% highest proba-
bility density (HPD). * indicates Bayesian
posterior probabilities > 95%. The full extent
of the upper 95% HPD for the two most
basal nodes is not shown. The scale bar shows
time in millions of years ago.
C. M. Davy et al.
280 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
(including those of C. conspicuosa between Isla San Esteban
and Isla Cholludo) recorded by Nabhan suggest that such
events have been well documented in their oral history.
Furthermore, the Seri practice of breaking the legs of lizards
being transported for food (Nabhan, 2002) makes accidental
translocations unlikely. Iguanas with broken or dislocated legs
would be unlikely to escape successfully. Even if they did
escape, an injured male would have difficulty mating, and
crippled females might be unable to dig suitable nests. Thus,
they would be unlikely to contribute to the gene pool. Leg-
breaking was not used during deliberate translocations of
animals because the desired outcome (establishment of a new
population that subsequently could be harvested) would be
thwarted (Nabhan, 2002).
Other incidental evidence also suggests pre-Seri divergence
of C. conspicuosa and C. nolascensis. The population of
C. conspicuosa on Isla Cholludo founded by the Seri (Grismer,
2002; Nabhan, 2002) can be used (albeit cautiously) as a null
model for the expected genealogical pattern (i.e. incomplete
lineage sorting) caused by Seri translocation. Although we
could not include these sequences in our analysis, Cryder’s
(1999) analysis included two individuals from this population,
both of which fall undifferentiated into the lineage containing
samples from Isla San Esteban (Fig. 2). In contrast to these
patterns, the genealogical distinctiveness of populations on Isla
San Pedro Nolasco and Isla San Esteban provide further
evidence that these populations are not the result of human
translocations.
The oral history of the Seri is a valuable cultural resource,
not only for the Seri themselves, but also for the rest of
humanity. As such, Nabhan’s (2002, 2003) documentation of
the ethno-herpetology of this culture provides an important
record of Seri traditional knowledge, and a relatively unique
anthropological work. Unfortunately, several species of reptiles
pictured in the book are misidentified. For example, Derm-
achelys coriacea is labelled as Caretta caretta; Pituophis is
labelled as Lampropeltis; a desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is
described as a ‘turtle’; a Sauromalus is labelled as Ctenosaura,
with the location of the photo incorrectly listed as Isla San
Esteban; and a Seri carving of a Ctenosaura is misidentified as
Sauromalus (Nabhan, 2003). These misidentifications raise the
question of whether other species described by Seri elders
could also be misidentified (i.e. assigned an incorrect scientific
name). This is not the case. The names associated with the
images are those in the photo archives of the Arizona-Sonora
Desert Museum, and the errors are editorial in nature (G.P.
Nabhan, University of Arizona, pers. comm. to R.W.M., 14
June 2010). The discrepancy in names does not invalidate the
traditional knowledge that Nabhan (2002, 2003) has so
carefully collected.
Along with its inherent value, traditional knowledge can be
an important source of scientific inspiration, and can inform
the development of scientific hypotheses and management
plans (e.g. Kimmins, 2008). However, the sharing of tradi-
tional knowledge by indigenous communities is a gesture of
trust, and selective interpretations of traditional knowledge by
members of the scientific community can damage that trust.
We acknowledge that the occurrence of C. conspicuosa on a
small, oceanic island far from any obvious founder popula-
tions is a biogeographical conundrum. Human (specifically
Seri Indian) activities are known to have strongly shaped the
biogeography of the Sea of Cortes, and human-mediated
dispersal of C. hemilopha between the islands was first
suggested to explain this puzzle nearly a century ago (Bailey,
1928). There is no doubt that the Seri are capable of
successfully founding insular populations of iguanid lizards
(Petren & Case, 1997, 2002; Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002;
Nabhan, 2002, 2003), so Bailey’s original hypothesis of human-
mediated dispersal was a reasonable one. However, the current
question is not one of ability, but simply of whether or not
humans actually translocated C. hemilopha from Isla San Pedro
Nolasco to Isla San Esteban. At this time, traditional knowl-
edge and molecular biology both reject the hypothesis of
human-mediated dispersal of C. hemilopha between these two
islands, and a new interpretation of the biogeography of the
C. hemilopha complex is needed.
Biogeography of the C. hemilopha species complex
Our tree topology differs slightly from that shown in Fig. 2
(Cryder, 1999), but both genealogies indicate that at least two
independent colonization events were involved in the history
of C. nolascensis on Isla San Pedro Nolasco: one by an ancestor
shared with C. conspicuosa, and the other by an ancestor shared
with the mainland and peninsular species. Cryder’s tree places
C. nolascensis-2 as the immediate sister of C. macrolopha, while
our analyses resolves C. macrolopha and C. hemilopha in a
lineage sister to C. nolascensis-2. It is possible that we sampled
different haplotypes within C. nolascensis, which would suggest
the potential presence of three or more matrilines on Isla San
Pedro Nolasco. However, because the proportions of samples
falling into each C. nolascensis lineage are roughly equal in the
two studies, it is more likely that we sampled the same two
matrilines of C. nolascensis as Cryder. Although sampling was
limited in both studies, the frequencies of the two haplotypes
are about 60% C. nolascensis-1:40% C. nolascensis-2. These two
haplogroups had 4.5% divergence between them, a higher
divergence than occurred between any two recognized species
within the complex. Such genealogical patterns are often
interpreted as evidence for cryptic speciation (e.g. Tavares &
Baker, 2008). However, C. nolascensis is morphologically
distinct from the other species of Ctenosaura (Grismer,
1999), and we know of no previous mention of distinct
morphotypes within C. nolascensis on Isla San Pedro Nolasco.
Because of the morphological distinctness of C. nolascensis and
the lack of obvious mechanisms of reproductive isolation on
the island, we find the hypothesis of sympatric cryptic species
within C. nolascensis to be improbable.
Differences between Cryder’s and our trees probably result
from different sampling strategies. Cryder’s analysis included
the subspecies C. h. insulana from Isla Cerralvo, which may
have affected the inferred relationships among the species.
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 281ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Furthermore, Cryder’s (1999) analysis of C. macrolopha was
based on individuals collected at a single locality within the
species’ wide range. Because this strategy was unlikely to
sample genetic diversity in mainland species, we collected
samples throughout the range of C. macrolopha along the coast
of Sonora and Sinaloa from the north to south extremes, as
well as for about half of the range for C. hemilopha on the
peninsula of Baja California (Fig. 1). However, our sampling
did not fully cover these species’ ranges, and sampling further
inland in Sonora and Sinaloa and further north on the
peninsula might have discovered additional lineages.
Further sampling of C. macrolopha could be extremely
informative, especially because the matrilines within this
species do not form a single lineage, and the species may
contain several more divergent lineages. One sample of
C. macrolopha (CH19, from Culiacan, Sinaloa) was resolved
as sister to C. nolascensis-1, and this is particularly intriguing.
The sample site is not near Isla San Pedro Nolasco (Fig. 1), and
the haplotype occurred alongside the more common haplotype
in C. macrolopha. Thus, there is no reason to suspect that
C. macrolopha haplotypes segregate geographically. There are
several potential explanations for the placement of this sample
in the genealogy. First, it could be the result of incomplete
lineage sorting. Second, the pattern could be caused by Seri (or
other human) transport of C. nolascensis to the mainland,
followed by deliberate or accidental introduction into the wild.
Given the estimated average divergence date of 1.57 Ma for
this haplotype (95% HPD = 3.32–0.23 Ma; Fig. 4), we find
these two explanations unlikely. Third, this pattern could
indicate historical dispersal from San Pedro Nolasco to the
mainland, followed by cytoplasmic capture and incorporation
of the C. nolascensis-like haplotype into C. macrolopha. The
presence of iguanids on many deep-water oceanic islands
testifies to their ability to disperse across oceans, and Isla San
Pedro Nolasco is only 14.6 km offshore. More rigorous
sampling of the matrilines present throughout Sonora and
Sinaloa may shed further light on the question.
The most perplexing aspect of the data is the counterin-
tuitive pattern of divergence, whereby the mainland and
peninsular species diverged after their origin from the two
insular species. Ctenosaura conspicuosa and C. nolascensis
became isolated from the mainland population of the
C. hemilopha complex after their divergence from C. pectinata.
The peninsula of Baja California, being formed more than
5 Ma (Murphy & Aguirre-Leon, 2002), is much older than the
minimum estimated Pleistocene divergence between the two
non-insular forms, C. hemilopha and C. macrolopha (Table 4).
This leads to two possible biogeographical scenarios. Ancestral
Ctenosaura from the mainland may have dispersed around
the head of the Sea of Cortes into the southern part of the
peninsula. Alternatively, the distribution may have been
continuous, and isolation could reflect Pleistocene climatic
changes. The absence of fossil Ctenosaura from California,
Arizona and the peninsula of Baja California suggests that
dispersal was probably involved. Regardless, isolation of the
peninsular population from the mainland population led to a
cladogenic event, probably during the Pleistocene. Evidence
from nuclear genes would allow the construction of a
more informative species phylogeny, which may clarify the
evolutionary history of these species. The detailed biogeo-
graphy of this species complex continues to defy detailed
interpretation, but we now know that humans were not
involved.
Human activities have played a pivotal role in the
biogeographical history of many species, but testing hypo-
theses of human translocations is often challenging, and
limited by the available evidence. We successfully used
traditional mtDNA analysis, together with Bayesian methods,
to refute the hypothesis of human-mediated dispersal in the
case of the C. hemilopha complex, and reached an alternative
conclusion that is in keeping with the traditional knowledge of
the Seri people. In our case, the traditional knowledge of the
Seri was carefully documented (Nabhan, 2002, 2003), but this
is often not the case. The teachings of many cultures are
rapidly being lost. It is our hope that the information
contained in traditional teachings can be preserved, and that
such knowledge will continue to inform scientific studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We especially thank the Seri people of Tiburon and Isla San
Esteban for permission to enter and sample lizards on their
traditional lands. Sample collection in Mexico was approved
by the Mexican government (SEMARNAT SGPA/ DGVS/
03489/07). Access to an MSc thesis from Loma Linda
University was kindly granted by W. Hays; R.L. Carter made
valiant attempts to retrieve M. Cryder’s sequence data; and
G.P. Nabhan graciously provided important information. We
thank C. Blair and two anonymous referees for valuable
comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. C.M.D. was
supported by a Canada Graduate Scholarship from the
National Research Council of Canada. This research was
supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineer-
ing Research Council of Canada, Discovery Grant A3148, the
Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) Foundation, and the ROM
Members Volunteer Committee to R.W.M.
REFERENCES
Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identi-
fication. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
Akaike, H. (1979) A Bayesian extension of the minimum AIC
procedure of autoregressive model fitting. Biometrika, 66,
237–242.
Austin, C.C. (1999) Lizards took express train to Polynesia.
Nature, 397, 113–114.
Bailey, J.W. (1928) A revision of the lizards of the genus
Ctenosaura. Proceedings of the United States National
Museum, 73, article 12, 1–57.
Benton, M.J. & Ayala, F.J. (2003) Dating the tree of life.
Science, 300, 1698–1700.
C. M. Davy et al.
282 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blair, C., Mendez de la Cruz, F.R., Ngo, A., Lindell, J., Lathrop,
A. & Murphy, R.W. (2009) Molecular phylogenetics and
taxonomy of leaf-toed geckos (Phyllodactylidae: Phyllo-
dactylus) inhabiting the peninsula of Baja California. Zoo-
taxa, 2027, 28–42.
Brandley, M.C., Schmitz, A. & Reeder, T.W. (2005) Partitioned
Bayesian analysis, partition choice, and the phylogenetic
relationships of scincid lizards. Systematic Biology, 54, 373–
390.
Carlton, J.T. (2003) Community assembly and historical
biogeography in the North Atlantic Ocean: the potential role
of human-mediated dispersal vectors. Hydrobiologia, 503,
1–8.
Carreno, A.L. & Helenes, J. (2002) Geology and ages of the
islands. A new island biogeography of the Sea of Cortes (ed. by
T.J. Case, M.L. Cody and E. Ezcurra), pp. 14–40. Oxford
University Press, New York.
Cryder, M. (1999) Molecular systematics and evolution of the
Ctenosaura hemilopha complex (Squamata; Iguanidae). MSc
Thesis, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Phillips, M.J. & Rambaut, A.
(2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence.
PLoS Biology, 4, 699–710.
Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Philips, M.J. & Rambaut, A.
(2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling
trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 214–221.
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an
approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.
Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland, MA.
Goebel, T., Waters, M.R. & O’Rourke, D.H. (2008) The late
Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas.
Science, 319, 1497–1502.
Grismer, L.L. (1994) Geographic origins for the reptiles on
islands in the Sea of Cortes, Mexico. Herpetological Natural
History, 2, 51–106.
Grismer, L.L. (1999) An evolutionary classification of reptiles
on islands in the Sea of Cortes, Mexico. Herpetologica, 55,
446–469.
Grismer, L.L. (2002) Spiny-tailed iguanas, insular evolution,
and Seri Indians: how long does it take to make a new
species and does it matter who makes it? Iguana Times, 9,
3–8.
Heckman, K.L., Mariani, C.L., Rasoloarison, R. & Yoder, A.D.
(2007) Multiple nuclear loci reveal patterns of incomplete
lineage sorting and complex species history within western
mouse lemurs (Microcebus). Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution, 43, 353–367.
Hillis, D.M. & Bull, J.J. (1993) An empirical test of boot-
strapping as a method for assessing confidence in phyloge-
netic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42, 182–192.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian
inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755.
Kimmins, J.P. (2008) From science to stewardship: harnessing
forest ecology in the service of society. Forest Ecology and
Management, 256, 1625–1635.
Kocher, T.D., Thomas, W.K., Meyer, A., Edwards, S.V., Paabo,
S., Villablanca, F.X. & Wilson, A.C. (1989) Dynamics of
mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and
sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA, 86, 6196–6200.
Kohler, G., Schroth, W. & Streit, B. (2000) Systematics of the
Ctenosaura group of lizards (Reptilia: Sauria: Iguanidae).
Amphibia-Reptilia, 21, 177–191.
Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R.,
McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace,
I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J. &
Higgins, D.G. (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version 2.0.
Bioinformatics, 23, 2947–2948.
Lowe, C.H., Jr & Norris, K.S. (1955) Analysis of the herpe-
tofauna of Baja California, Mexico. III. New and revived
reptilian subspecies of Isla San Esteban, Sea of Cortes,
Sonora, Mexico, with notes on the satellite islands of Isla
Tiburon. Herpetologica, 11, 89–96.
Morando, M., Avila, L.J., Baker, J. & Sites, J.W., Jr (2004)
Phylogeny and phylogeography of the Liolaemus darwinii
complex (Squamata: Liolaemidae): evidence for intro-
gression and incomplete lineage sorting. Evolution, 58,
842–861.
Murphy, R.W. & Aguirre-Leon, G. (2002) The nonavian
reptiles: origins and evolution. A new island biogeography
of the Sea of Cortes (ed. by T.J. Case, M.L. Cody and
E. Ezcurra), pp. 181–220. Oxford University Press, New
York.
Murphy, R.W., Sanchez-Pinero, F., Polis, G.A. & Aalbu, R.L.
(2002) New measurements of area and distance for islands
in the Sea of Cortes. A new island biogeography of the Sea of
Cortes (ed. by T.J. Case, M.L. Cody and E. Ezcurra), pp.
447–464. Oxford University Press, New York.
Nabhan, G.P. (2002) Cultural dispersal of plants and reptiles.
A new island biogeography of the Sea of Cortes (ed. by T.J.
Case, M.L. Cody and E. Ezcurra), pp. 407–416. Oxford
University Press, New York.
Nabhan, G.P. (2003) Singing the turtles to sea: the Comcaac
(Seri) art and science of reptiles. University of California
Press, Berkeley, CA.
Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2000) Molecular evolution and phyloge-
netics. Oxford University Press, New York.
Nylander, J.A.A. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed
by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala Uni-
versity. Available at: http://www.abc.se/~nylander/ (accessed
2 November 2008).
Palumbi, S.R., Martin, A., Romano, S., McMillan, W.O., Stice,
L. & Grabowski, G. (1991) The simple fool’s guide to PCR, v.
2.0. Department of Zoology and Kewalo Marine Laboratory,
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
Petren, K. & Case, T.J. (1997) A phylogenetic analysis of body
size evolution in chuckwallas (Sauromalus) and other
iguanines. Evolution, 51, 206–219.
Petren, K. & Case, T.J. (2002) Updated mtDNA phylogeny for
Sauromalus and implications for the evolution of gigantism.
A new island biogeography of the Sea of Cortes (ed. by T.J.
Human translocation is not responsible for Ctenosaura hemilopha dispersal
Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284 283ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Case, M.L. Cody and E. Ezcurra), pp. 574–579. Oxford
University Press, New York.
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. (2007) Tracer v1.4. Available
at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
Reisz, R.R. & Muller, J. (2004) Molecular timescales and the
fossil record: a paleontological perspective. Trends in
Genetics, 20, 237–241.
Riddle, B.R., Dawson, M.N., Hadly, E.A., Hafner, D.J.,
Hickerson, M.J., Mantooth, S.J. & Yoder, A.D. (2008) The
role of molecular genetics in sculpting the future of inte-
grative biogeography. Progress in Physical Geography, 32,
173–202.
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian
phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics,
19, 1572–1574.
Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, R.,
Horn, G.T., Mullis, K.B. & Erlich, H.A. (1988) Primer-di-
rected enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable
DNA polymerase. Science, 239, 487–491.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular
cloning – a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press, New York.
Smith, H.M. (1935) Miscellaneous notes on Mexican lizards.
University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 22, 119–155.
Smith, H.M. (1972) The Sonoran subspecies of the lizard
Ctenosaura hemilopha. Great Basin Naturalist, 32, 104–111.
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using
parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sun-
derland, MA.
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4:
Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software
version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596–
1599.
Tavares, E.S. & Baker, A.J. (2008) Single mitochondrial gene
barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of
birds. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, doi:10.1186/1471-2148-
8-81.
Upton, D.E. & Murphy, R.W. (1997) Phylogeny of the side-
blotched lizards (Phrynosomatidae: Uta) based on mtDNA
sequences: support for a midpeninsular seaway in Baja
California. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 8, 104–
113.
Zarza, E., Reynoso, V.H. & Emerson, B.C. (2008) Diversifica-
tion in the northern neotropics: mitochondrial and nuclear
DNA phylogeography of the iguana Ctenosaura pectinata
and related species. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3259–3275.
BIOSKETCH
Christina M. Davy is a PhD candidate at the University of
Toronto, supervised by Professor R.W. Murphy. Her other
research focuses on the applied conservation and conservation
genetics of freshwater turtles.
Author contributions: R.W.M., F.M.C. and C.M.D. planned
the study; F.M.C. and R.W.M. collected the samples; A.L.
performed the laboratory analyses; and C.M.D. analysed the
data and led the writing.
Editor: Brett Riddle
C. M. Davy et al.
284 Journal of Biogeography 38, 272–284ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd