Sequence Alignment Part 3 Introduction to bioinformatics.
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
235 -
download
0
Transcript of Sequence Alignment Part 3 Introduction to bioinformatics.
Sequence Alignment Part 3
Introduction to bioinformatics
WHATS TODAY?
• MORE BLAST ….
- Similarity scores for protein sequences
- Gaps
- Statistical significance (e-value)
Protein Sequence AlignmentRule of thumb:Rule of thumb:Proteins are homologous if 25% identical (Proteins are homologous if 25% identical (length >100length >100))DNA sequences are homologous if 70% identicalDNA sequences are homologous if 70% identical
Protein Pairwise Sequence Alignment
• The alignment tools are similar to the DNA alignment tools• BLASTN for nucleotides • BLASTP for proteins
• Main difference: instead of scoring match (+2) and mismatch (-1) we have similarity scores:• Score s(i,j) > 0 if amino acids i and j have similar
properties • Score s(i,j) is 0 otherwise
• How should we score s(i,j)?
The 20 Amino Acids
Chemical Similarities Between Amino Acids
Acids & Amides DENQ (Asp, Glu, Asn, Gln)
Basic HKR (His, Lys, Arg)
Aromatic FYW (Phe, Tyr, Trp)
Hydrophilic ACGPST (Ala, Cys, Gly, Pro, Ser, Thr)
Hydrophobic ILMV (Ile, Leu, Met, Val)
Sequence Alignment based on AA similarity
TQSPSSLSASVGDTVTITCRASQSISTYLNWYQQKP----GKAPKLLIYAASSSQSGVPS|| + |||| +|| ||| | +| | | | |TQGKKVVLGKKGDTVELTCTASQKKSIQFHWKNSNQIKILGNQGSFLTKGPSKLNDRADS RFSGSGSGTDFTLTINSLQPEDFATYYCQ---------------QSYSTPHFSQGTKLEI | | | +| | | +|+ || || |+ + | | || | + RRSLWDQG-NFPLIIKNLKIEDSDTYICEVEDQKEEVQLLVFGLTANSDTHLLQGQSLTL
---KRTVAAPSVFIFPPSDEQLKSGTASVVCLLN---------NFYPREAKVQWKVD ++||| | + ++ | | | + ||++|+| TLESPPGSSPSVQCRSPRGKNIQGGKTLSVSQLELQDSGTWTCTVLQNQKKVEFKID
| = identity + = similarity
Amino Acid Substitutions Matrices
• When scoring protein sequence alignments it is common to use a matrix of 20 20, representing all pairwise comparisons :
Substitution Matrix
Given an alignment of closely related sequences we can score the relation between amino acidsbased on how frequently they substitute each other
In this column
E & D are found
7/8
M G Y D EM G Y D EM G Y E EM G Y D EM G Y Q EM G Y D EM G Y E EM G Y E E
Amino Acid MatricesSymmetric matrix of 20x20 entries: entry (i,j)=entry(j,i)
Entry (i,j): the score of aligning amino acid i against amino acid j.
Entry (i,i) is greater than any entry (i,j), ji.
PAM - Point Accepted Mutations• Developed by Margaret Dayhoff, 1978.• Analyzed very similar protein sequences
• Proteins are evolutionary close. • Alignment is easy.• Point mutations - mainly substitutions• Accepted mutations - by natural selection.
• Used global alignment.• Counted the number of substitutions (i,j) per amino acid pair:
Many i<->j substitutions => high score s(i,j)
• Found that common substitutions occurred involving chemically similar amino acids.
PAM 250
• Similar amino acids are close to each other.• Regions define conserved substitutions.
C H+H3N
COO-
HCH
C
O-O
C H+H3N
C
COO-
HCH
O-O
HCH
Aspartate(Asp, D)
Glutamate(Glu, E)
Example: Asp & Glu
Score = 3
Selecting a PAM Matrix
• Low PAM numbers: short sequences, strong local similarities.
• High PAM numbers: long sequences, weak similarities.– PAM120 recommended for general use (40% identity)
– PAM60 for close relations (60% identity)
– PAM250 for distant relations (20% identity)
• If uncertain, try several different matrices– PAM40, PAM120, PAM250 recommended
BLOSUM• Blocks Substitution Matrix
– Steven and Jorga G. Henikoff (1992)
• Based on BLOCKS database (www.blocks.fhcrc.org)
– Families of proteins with identical function
– Highly conserved protein domains
• Ungapped local alignment to identify motifs– Each motif is a block of local alignment
– Counts amino acids observed in same column
– Symmetrical model of substitution AABCDA… BBCDA DABCDA. A.BBCBB BBBCDABA.BCCAA AAACDAC.DCBCDB CCBADAB.DBBDCC AAACAA… BBCCC
BLOSUM Matrices
• Different BLOSUMn matrices are calculated independently from BLOCKS
• BLOSUMn is based on sequences that are at most n percent identical.
Selecting a BLOSUM Matrix
• For BLOSUMn, higher n suitable for sequences which are more similar– BLOSUM62 recommended for general use– BLOSUM80 for close relations– BLOSUM45 for distant relations
Summary:
• BLOSUM matrices are based on the replacement patterns found in more highly conserved regions of the sequences without gaps
• PAM matrices based on mutations observed throughout a global alignment, includes both highly conserved and highly mutable regions
Gap Scores
• Example showed -1 score per indel– So gap cost is proportional to its length
• Biologically, indels occur in groups– We want our gap score to reflect this
• Standard solution: affine gap model– Once-off cost for opening a gap– Lower cost for extending the gap– Changes required to algorithm
Scoring system =
Substitution Matrix + Gap Penalty
Gap penalty
• We expect to penalize gaps • Scoring for gap opening & for extension
– Insertions and deletions are rare in evolution
– But once they are created, they are easy to extend
– Gap-extension penalty < gap-open penalty
• Default gap parameters are given for each matrix:– PAM30: open=9, extension=1– PAM250: open=14, extension=2
• AAAAAAAAAAA
• ATATATATATATA
• CAGCAGCAGCAG
Low Complexity Sequences
How does BLAST deal with low complexity sequences?
Sequences of low complexity can cause getting significant hitswhich are not true homologues !!!
By default low complexity sequences are filtered out and replaced by XXXXX
Statistical significance
E-value• The number of hits (with the same similarity score) one can
"expect" to see just by chance when searching the given string in a database of a particular size.
• higher e-value lower similarity– “sequences with E-value of less than 0.01 are almost always
found to be homologous”
• The lower bound is normally 0 (we want to find the best)
Expectation Values
Increases linearly with
length of query sequence
Increases linearly with
length of database
Decreases exponentially with score of
alignment
• Bit score (S)– Similar to alignment score– Normalized– Higher means more significant
• E value:Number of hits of score ≥ S expected by chance – Based on random database of similar size– Lower means more significant– Used to assess the statistical significance of the
alignment
Remote homologues
• Sometimes BLAST isn’t enough.
• Large protein family, and BLAST only gives close members. We want more distant members
PSI-BLAST
PSI-BLAST
• Position Specific Iterated BLAST
Regular blast
Construct profile from blast results
Blast profile search
Final results
PSI-BLAST
• Advantage: PSI-BLAST looks for seqs that are close to ours, and learns from them to extend the circle of friends
• Disadvantage: if we found a WRONG sequence, we will get to unrelated sequences. This gets worse and worse each iteration