Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

46
Presented By: DUDBC Assessment Group

Transcript of Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Page 1: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Presented By: DUDBC Assessment Group

Page 2: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

To access the damage induced by the 2068/6/1 Taplejung Earthquake.

To evaluate the overall approximate cost of damage caused by the Earthquake.

To study about the damage patterns for the formulation of the trainings concerning Earthquake Resistant Construction of Buildings.

Page 3: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 4: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 5: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Study Area

Team 1Location:

Dhankuta, Tehrathum, Bhojpur, Sankhuwasabha

Team 2Location:

Jhapa,Ilam,Taplejung,Panchthar

Team Member:(Ilam)S.D.E. Binay Charan ShresthaMahesh SinghHimal K.C.Parikshit P. KadariyaBinod Shrestha (PulchowkCampus)Bhim Paudel (Home Ministry)

Team Member: (Dhankuta)S.D.E. Sagar Krishna JoshiNabin MalakarRam Chandra ThapaGovinda ThapaBishow Kumar Shrestha(Pulchowk Campus)Maiya Kandel (Home Ministry)

Page 6: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Secondary data was taken from Home Ministry.

The data was verified from the respective CDOOffice.

Field Visits were conducted with co-ordination from CDO Office, Municipality, VDC's, Police, Red Cross and other NGOs.

Sample buildings were selected in such a way that it covers all the Damage Grades according to the data of Home Ministry.

Page 7: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Data was collected according to the approved format of MoPPW.

Two types of forms were used.

Rapid Evaluation Form

Detailed Evaluation Form

Page 8: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Data was organized to get the real picture of the damage.

Data was divided according to the damage grade of buildings.

The Data was sorted out to find the types of construction as well as types of occupancy.

Page 9: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Grade 1: Negligible to slight damage

(no structural damage,

slight non-structural damage)

Hair-line cracks in very few walls.

Fall of small pieces of plaster only.

Fall of loose stones from upper parts of buildings in

very few cases.

Grade 2: Moderate damage

(slight structural damage, moderate

non-structural damage)

Cracks in many walls.

Fall of fairly large pieces of plaster.

Partial collapse of chimneys.

Classification of damage to masonry buildings

Page 10: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Grade 3: Substantial to heavy

damage (moderate structural damage, heavy non-structural damage)

Large and extensive cracks in most walls.Roof tiles detach. Chimneys fracture at the roof line; failure of individual non-structural elements (partitions, gable walls).

Grade 4: Very heavy damage

(heavy structural damage,very heavy non-structural damage)

Serious failure of walls; partial structural failure of roofs and floors.

Classification of damage to masonry buildings

Page 11: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Grade 5: Destruction

(very heavy structural damage)

Total or near total collapse.

Classification of damage to masonry buildings

Page 12: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

All grades of damage were seen.

The data of Home Ministry was correlated with the damage grades as follows

Home Ministry Damage Grade

Minor Damage DG-1

Partial Damage DG-2 & DG-3

Total Damage (Collapse) DG-4 & DG-5

Page 13: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Ilam Panchthar Taplejung Dhankuta Terhathum

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Page 14: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Stone in Mud RC Frame Stone in Cement Brick in Mud Brick in Cement Others

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Page 15: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

0

5

10

15

20

25

Residential Educational Office Building Police Station Community Building

Others

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Page 16: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Corner Failures/Cracks

Shear Failures and Diagonal Cracks.

Cracks at Openings.

Gable fall down and cracks.

De-lamination of wall

Bulging / Falling of unsupported long walls.

Damage / Falling of Free Standing Walls.

Improper Load Path

Soft Storey Problems.

Torsion

Complete Collapse

Rocking Failure

Floor Separation

Out of Plane Failure

Settlement / Slope Failure

Floor Drift/ Slide

Page 17: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Lack of Through Stones

Lack of Bands(Sill, Lintel and Gable)and Stitches

Slenderness Ratio Exceeded

Improper Opening Positions and Sizes.

Lack of Better Bonding Between Masonry unit.

Irregular Configuration

Improper Site Selection

Wrong Load Path

Lack of Integrity between Ground Floor and First Floor.

Lack of Vertical Reinforcement at Junction.

Page 18: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 19: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 20: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 21: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 22: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 23: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 24: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 25: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 26: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 27: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 28: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 29: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 30: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 31: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 32: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 33: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 34: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 35: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 36: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 37: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 38: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 39: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

The following recovery measures were suggested for different damage grades.

For DG-1 and other unaffected buildings, it is suggested to retrofit them to cope with the upcoming Earthquakes.

Damage Grade Suggested Recovery Measures

DG-2 Repair + Retrofit

DG-3 Repair, Retrofit + Partial Demolish.

DG-4 & DG-5 Demolish

Page 40: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 41: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 42: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 43: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment
Page 44: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Amount in Rs.

Retrofitting with wood members

63226

Retrofitting with Concrete members

289693.20

Repair of cracked wall per meter length

997.60

Cost of new construction 500000

Cost of new construction with using usable existingmaterials ( 60% of New Construction Cost)

300000

Page 45: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Damage Grade

Total House No.

Unit Cost in Rs. Total Cost

G1 1111 997*20=19,940 = 2,21,53,340

G2 & G3 9749 63226+19940=83,166 =81,07,85,334

G4 & G5 5293 5,00,000 =2,64,65,00,000

Total =3,47,94,38,674

Page 46: Sept11 2011 earthquake damage assessment

Damage Grade

School Building

Other Government Building

G2 & G3 608 362

G4 & G5 350 115