Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the...

5
Message From: Sent: To: Subject: Bruce Sounes [/OSTUDIO E/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BRUCE] 28/02/2014 12:49:59 BLYTHE Peter [[email protected]] RE: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions Attachments: Grenfell Tender Evaluation Spreadsheet.xlsx Peter, Please see my scoring attached. I've collated them below: Rydon 2.1 Logistics Methodology 2.2 Phasing plans 3 Programme 5 Planning 9.1 Environmental Score /10 7 8 8 5 5 Comment Breakdown into stages and detailed consideration of enabling works very plausible. Offer several improvements on the outline provided at tender. Completion/contractor exit well considered. Detailed and clear. Consistent with logistics / methodology. Omits Planning signoff. Compliant but against the other submissions should Rydon have challenged the programme, particularly the mobilisation and enabling phases? Too generic. Discusses consultation as if it were a new application Generic but ISO14001 good 2.1 2.2 3 9.1 Mulalley Logistics Methodology Phasing plans Programme Planning Environmental Score /10 5 7.5 Comment Very detailed but on it's own does not communicate phasing. Does not discuss reasons for alternative extended programme, or the status of this variant. Drawings too small and not used to communicate phasing. Very detailed. Variant considerably longer, both in preparation and in execution. More focussed than the others; recognises Conditions are part of larger approval process. Good Durkan 2.1 Logistics Methodology 2.2 Phasing plans 3 Programme 5 Planning 9.1 Environmental Score/10 Comment 5 5 Inadequate detail given complexity. Possibly unrealistic traffic management. No phasing Not compliant and no discussion of why start on site is delayed until late July. Cladding works considerably longer than competitor despite both having put Harley forward. Too brief. Does not identify risks. Adequate response but is almost entirely generic I was not sure what to make of the non-compliant programmes. Regards Bruce Sounes For and on behalf of STUDIO E L L P SEA00010630 0001 SEA00010630/1

Transcript of Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the...

Page 1: Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

Message

From:

Sent: To: Subject:

Bruce Sounes [/OSTUDIO E/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BRUCE] 28/02/2014 12:49:59 BLYTHE Peter [[email protected]] RE: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions

Attachments: Grenfell Tender Evaluation Spreadsheet.xlsx

Peter,

Please see my scoring a t tached. I've col lated t h e m be low:

Rydon 2.1 Logistics Me thodo logy

2.2 Phasing plans

3 Programme

5 Planning

9.1 Envi ronmenta l

Score /10 7

8

8

5

5

Comment Breakdown in to stages and deta i led cons iderat ion of enabl ing works very plausible. Of fer several improvements on the out l ine prov ided at tender . Comp le t ion /con t rac to r exit wel l considered. Detai led and clear.

Consistent w i t h logistics / methodo logy . Omits Planning signoff . Compl iant

bu t against t he o ther submissions should Rydon have chal lenged the

p rog ramme, part icular ly the mobi l isa t ion and enabl ing phases?

Too generic. Discusses consul ta t ion as if i t w e r e a new appl icat ion

Generic but ISO14001 good

2.1

2.2

3

9.1

Mulalley Logistics Me thodo logy

Phasing plans

Programme

Planning

Envi ronmenta l

Score /10 5

7.5

Comment Very detai led but on it's o w n does no t commun ica te phasing. Does not discuss reasons fo r a l ternat ive ex tended p rog ramme, or t h e status of this var iant . Drawings t oo small and not used to commun ica te phasing.

Very deta i led. Var iant considerably longer, bo th in prepara t ion and in execut ion. Mo re focussed than the others; recognises Condi t ions are part of larger approval process. Good

Durkan 2.1 Logistics Me thodo logy

2.2 Phasing plans

3 Programme

5 Planning

9.1 Envi ronmenta l

Score/10 Comment

5

5

Inadequate detai l given complex i ty . Possibly unreal ist ic t ra f f ic management .

No phasing

Not compl ian t and no discussion of w h y start on site is delayed unt i l late July. Cladding works considerably longer than compet i t o r despite both having pu t Harley f o r w a r d . Too brief. Does not ident i fy risks.

Adequate response but is a lmost ent i re ly generic

I was not sure w h a t to make of t he non-compl ian t p rogrammes.

Regards

Bruce Sounes

For and on behalf of

STUDIO E L L P

SEA00010630 0001

SEA00010630/1

Page 2: Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

Palace Wharf, Rainville Road, London W6 9HN T ( ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H | F^HMMMMH I www.studioe.co.uk

• M M N U ocvuo^wir

Queen's Award for Enterprise: Sustainable Development 2010 BCSE Award School Architect of the Year 2008 & 2010 BCSE Award Inspiring Design Primary School 2008 & Academy 2010 BSF Award Excellence in Student Engagement 2009 Sustainable City Award 2009

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

E L E C T R O N I C INFORMATION T R A N S F E R DISCLAIMER This email and any files transmitted with it are sent for and on behalf of Studio E and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. All attached files are copyright and may only be used for the purpose stated in the drawing status box. In the event that the files are altered in anyway, it is a condition of use that the Studio E name and logo be removed f rom the modified file, unless prior written agreement has been obtained. Studio E will assume no responsibility for the accuracy, adequacy, and integrity of the files, and recommends that the files be thoroughly screened for viruses prior to installation. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by Studio E LLP unless otherwise indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.

From: BLYTHE Peter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 February 2014 09:39 To: Bruce Sounes

Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions

Thanks Bruce,

I appreciate that it is a lengthy process, but TMO are keen to ensure that we evaluate the tenders fairly so they all need to be marked against the same criteria. When they ask for feedback it will be easier for us to respond as well.

Your marks would be much appreciated by lunch as I need to send a draft tender report to the TMO early this afternoon.

Thanks again for your help,

Pete

/VRTEL IA

Peter BLYTHE Assistant Project Manager ARTELIA UK

irj-rrBNUTionjii

High Tel

2-54 High Holborn • Mob:

WC1V6RL • Holborn • United Kingdom www.uk.arteliaqroup.com

Artelia UK is accredited to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001

SEA00010630 0002

SEA00010630/2

Page 3: Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1

This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any use not in accordance with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except with explicit formal approval. The internet cannot guarantee the integrity of this message. ARTELIA (and its subsidiaries) shall not therefore be liable for the message if modified.

ARTELIA PROJECTS UK LTD - Registered Office : The Broadgate Tower 3rd Floor 20 Primrose Street London - EC2A 2RS - Trading as ARTELIA UK Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 03913368

APPLEYARDS LTD - Registered Office : Tubs Hill House London Road Sevenoaks - T N 13 1BL - Trading as ARTELIA UK Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 03935522

From: Bruce Sounes rmailto:[email protected] Sent: 27 February 2014 20:38 To: BLYTHE Peter

Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions

Peter,

I've got through question 2 and begun on 3. It's rather tedious and I hope to have the others back to you for lunch tomorrow.

Rydons are way ahead of the other two on logistics so by now I'm guessing it's academic.

Regards

Bruce Sounes

For and on behalf of

STUDIO E L L P

Palace Wharf, Rainville Road, London W6 9HN T ( • B | VHBHmH | www.studioe.co.uk

From: BLYTHE Peter Fmailto:[email protected] Sent: 26 February 2014 10:36 To: Bruce Sounes Cc: BOOTH Philip

Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions

Morning Bruce,

I apologise, but we have had another discussion and feel that your thoughts on question 9.1 would also be helpful.

All of these questions are being answered by at least 2 people and then the average score will be taken.

Kind regards.

SEA00010630 0003

SEA00010630/3

Page 4: Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

Peter

Peter BLYTHE Assistant Project Manager ARTELIA UK High H o l b o r r ^ o u s ^ ^ 2 - 5 4 H i a l ^ o l b o r r ^ W y V 6RL • Holborn • United Kingdom Tel : | | * M o b | B www.uk.arteliagroup.com Artelia UK is accredited to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001

This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any use not in accordance with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except with explicit formal approval. The internet cannot guarantee the integrity of this message. ARTELIA (and its subsidiaries) shall not therefore be liable for the message if modified.

ARTELIA PROJECTS UK LTD - Registered Office : The Broadgate Tower 3rd Floor 20 Primrose Street London - EC2A 2RS - Trading as ARTELIA UK Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 03913368

APPLEYARDS LTD - Registered Office : Tubs Hill House London Road Sevenoaks - T N 13 1BL - Trading as ARTELIA UK Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 03935522

From: BLYTHE Peter Sent: 24 February 2014 17:36 To: Bruce Sounes ([email protected]') Subject: Grenfell Tower Tender Quality Questions

Afternoon Bruce,

Further to our conversation, please find attached a document titled "who marks what" that Jenny produced. As you will see, we would like you to mark questions 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 and 5.1.

The details for the new SharePoint site are below. Please note that you will have to click 'sign in with other account' before putting the details in as it will probably remember the previous details.

https://sevintranet.applevards.co.uk/bu/PPM/proiects/grenfell/Tender%20Returns/Forms/Allltems.aspx

Username:- Appleyards\grenfell_read Password :- forfun@44

You will also find a spreadsheet for scoring on their - I did not create a column for your scores, but if you add your scores and send the sheet back to me I will populate an overall spreadsheet. I have copied the scoring methodology below as well - please give me a shout if you have any questions.

A R T E Ll A in-rrnitfATIOWAt,

SEA00010630 0004

SEA00010630/4

Page 5: Sent: To · 2020-03-02 · SAFETY WEEK i March 17-21,2014 1 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

1 4 Using the scoring methodology set out below the evaluators will attribute a mark ta each response to the quest ions in the Technical Qual i ty and each response in the Interview Quality.

Kind regards,

Peter

Score Assessment In terpre ta t ion 10 Excellent In addition to providing a response that would be deemed

"good ' , the response identifies factors that offer potential to significantly improve value for money with full support ing evidence .

8 Good In addition to providing a response that would be 'satisfactory", the response identifies factors that offer potential to improve value for money wrth reasonable supportinci evidence.

6 Acceptable The submitted response addresses the question without any reservations with reasonable evidence to support the response

4 Minor Reservatic ns

Minor reservations on the submitted response and/or insufficient evidence to support the response

2 Major Reservatic ns

Major reservatmns on the submitted response andior insufficient evidence to support the response.

0 Unacceptable No answer submitted cr the proposal is totally inadequate I

Peter Blythe Assistant Project Manager Artella UK

^ y R " r E | _ | / \ High H o l b m i H o u s e j a ^ High Holborn- London • W C I V SRL I N n i H A T I O N A l Tel. Mob ; www.artellaqroup.com

This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. I f you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. ARTELIA (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message i f modified.

ARTELIA PROJECTS UK LTD - Registered Office : The Broadgate Tower 3rd Floor 20 Primrose Street London - EC2A 2RS - Trading as ARTELIA UK Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 3913368

SEA00010630 0005

SEA00010630/5