Sensitivity of receptor – LandscapeA landscape known and cherished by many people from across the...

Sensitivity of receptor – Landscape

Typical description of the receptor

Neg

ligib

leM

ediu

mLo

wH

igh

A professional judgement on landscape sensitivity is made with reference to the following criteria.

• Landscapecharacterphysicalaspects Consideration of landform, land cover, enclosure / openness,

settlement pattern etc.

• Landscapecharacter–aestheticaspects scale, pattern, scenic qualities, sense of place, movement,

tranquillity, remoteness, wildness and complexity of the landscape.

• Landscapevalue Consensus evidence for the value which society, including local

communities, attach to the landscape. Evidence may include local, national or international designation such as National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) or Registered Parks and Gardens of Historic Interest. But might also be non-designated value expressed by local community or special interest groups or professional bodies. Local context may result in an

otherwise unremarkable landscape being valued in relation to its comparative rarity or amenity value in an area which lacks similar landscapes. A landscape may also be valued for its inherent quality for instance as a good or typical example of a particular type of landscape or its distinctiveness. The way a landscape is experienced, by whom and from where it is experienced are factors that may also be taken into account.

• Landscapequalityorcondition Physical condition of the landscape, including the degree

of intactness of its features and composition. Maintenance, degradation damage scope for restoration / enhancement.

• Visualenclosure/opennessofviews Consideration of topography, vegetation and development in

determining the degree to which views are open or constrained. • Scopeformitigationincharacterwiththelandscape • Culturalheritagefactors • Naturalheritagefactors

A landscape known and cherished by very many people from across the UK or internationally.

A landscape known and cherished by many people from across the region or county. Nationally or regionally designated landscapes.

Strong landscape structure, characteristics, patterns, balanced combination of landform and land cover. Strong sense of place. Occasional detracting features. Appropriate management but potential to improve. A valued landscape.

A County landscape site.

Recognisable landscape structure, characteristics, patterns, balanced combination of landform and land cover. Sense of place. Some detracting features. Potential to improve management. An ordinary landscape.

Non-designated landscape of particularly distinctive or exemplar character or with features of some cultural or natural heritage value.

An ordinary landscape valued by the local community / special interest groups.

Locally designated or important open gaps.

Landscape with relatively ordinary characteristics.

Weak landscape structure, characteristics, patterns, balanced combination of landform and land cover.Poor sense of place. Frequent detracting features. Lack of management. A landscape not valued.

A landscape valued by few people with few features of value or interest.

Featureless, spoiled or mundane landscape with few features of value or interest.

National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and World Heritage Sites.

Very strong landscape structure, characteristics, patterns, balanced combination of landform and land cover. Exceptional sense of place. No detracting features. Good management. A highly valued landscape.

Northstowe

Figure 4.1 Receptor sensitivity

Environmental statement Chapter4Landscape and visual effects

Magnitudeofchange – Landscape

Neg

ligib

leM

ediu

mSmall

Large

Typical description of the change predicted

Adverse effects• Totallossof,ormajoralteration

of or damage to key positive elements / features of the landscape.

• Majornegativechangetothe balance or relationship of characteristics.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would dominate the receiving landscape.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be wholly or largely at odds with the scale, pattern, appearance and topography of the landscape.

Beneficial effects• Totalormajorrestorationof,or

addition / enhancement of key positive elements / features of the landscape.

• Totalormajorlossof,oralterationto key negative elements / features that detract from the character of the landscape.

• Majorpositivechangetothebalance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be much more characteristic of the receiving landscape than the elements replaced / altered.

Adverse effects• Partiallossof,ormoderate

alteration to key positive elements / features of the landscape.

• Moderatenegativechangetothe balance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would have a moderate negative influence on the receiving landscape.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be moderately at odds with the scale, pattern, appearance and topography of the landscape.

Beneficial effects• Partialrestorationof,ormoderate


• Partiallossof,ormoderatealteration of key negative elements / features that detract from the character of the landscape.

• Moderatepositivechangetothe balance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be noticeably more characteristic of the receiving landscape than the elements replaced / altered.

Adverse effects• Minorlossof,orsmallalterationof

key positive elements / features of the landscape.

• Minornegativechangetothe balance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would have a minor negative influence on the receiving landscape.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be to a small extent, at odds with the scale, pattern, appearance and topography of the landscape.

Beneficial effects• Minorrestorationof,orsmall

addition / enhancement of key positive elements/features of the landscape.

• Minorlossof,orsmallalterationofkey negative elements / features that detract from the character of the landscape.

• Minorpositivechangetothebalance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofelementsofascale,form or colour, that would be, to a small extent, more characteristic of the receiving landscape than the elements replaced / altered.

Adverse effects• Veryminorlossof,orsmall

alteration of key positive elements / features of the landscape.

• Veryminornegativechangetothe balance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would have a very minor negative influence on the receiving landscape.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour that would be to a very small extent, at odds with the scale, pattern, appearance and topography of the landscape.

Beneficial effects• Veryminorrestorationof,orsmall


• Veryminorlossof,orsmallalteration of key negative elements/features that detract from the character of the landscape.

• Veryminorpositivechangetothe balance or relationship of landscape characteristics.

• Introductionofelementsofascale, form or colour, that would be, to a very small extent, more characteristic of the receiving landscape than the elements replaced / altered.

Northstowe

Figure 4.2 Impactmagnitude


Determinationofsignificancematrix – Landscape

Mag

nitu

de /

sca

le o

f cha

nge

Large

Med

ium

Small

Neg

ligib

le

High Medium NegligibleLow

Sensitivity of receptor

Degrees of effect Verysubstantial: Large change to a landscape of high sensitivity.

Substantial: Medium-large change to a landscape of medium-high sensitivity, medium change to a landscape of high sensitivity or large change to a landscape of medium sensitivity.

Moderate: Medium change to a landscape of medium sensitivity, large change to a landscape of low sensitivity or small change to a landscape of high sensitivity.

Slight: Medium or small change to a landscape of low sensitivity or small change to a landscape of medium sensitivity.

Negligible: Negligible, small, medium or large change to a landscape of negligible sensitivity or negligible change to a landscape of low, medium or high sensitivity.

Significance If the degree of effect is moderate or above, then the effect is considered to be significant.

In some cases, the judgement of sensitivity or magnitude of change may fall somewhere between two descriptions, for instance a magnitude of change may be considered to be greater than small but less than medium and in these cases it is acceptable to describe these instances as lying between the two, in this instance, small-medium. It is also acceptable to describe effects in the same way, if it is considered that the effect lies between two effect descriptions.

Negligible effect

Slight effect

Moderate effect

Substantial effect

Very substantial

effect

Northstowe

Figure 4.3 Degree of effect



Sensitivity of receptor – Visual change

Typical description of the receptor

Neg

ligib

leM

ediu

mLo

wH

igh

Public views of or from areas of protected landscape such as National Park and AONB

Occupiers of residential properties with views affected by development

Views from rights of way, rural roads and recreational areas where the focus may be on the landscape and tolerance to change is likely to be low

Views from offices, social meeting and learning places where the focus is unlikely to be on the landscape

Views from urban roads and footways, railways, industrial areas and trading parks, where the focus of attention is unlikely to be on the landscape and where tolerance to change is likely to be high

Areas without public or private views

Views from community areas, residential areas or public footpaths are generally considered more important than transient views from roads or views from workplaces, although transient views can include tourist routes that may be important. Views of attractive unspoilt landscapes might be considered more important than views of a rapidly changing area of development. Views that have cultural associations might also be considered to be sensitive. The judgement may also be moderated by reference to one or more of the additional criteria listed below:

• Thenumberofpeopleaffected;

• Theperiodoftimeandfrequencythatreceptorsexperiencetheview;

• Thestatus(resident/visitor),occupations/activityandconsequent expectations of the receptor group and the degree to which that group has a proprietary interest in theviewandistoleranttochange;

• Theconsensualimportanceoftheview;thiscanincludecultural, historical and archaeological associations and tourist/leisure/recreationalassociations;

• Thecontextoftheviewpoint;

• Otherfactorssuchasspecific,regularmeteorologicalconditions at the site or the landscape being in constant change due to the type of use, e.g. mineral storage and movement of aggregate stockpiles.

Northstowe

Figure 4.4 Receptor sensitivity

Magnitudeofchange – Visual change

Neg

ligib

leM

ediu

mSmall

Large

Typical description of the change predicted

Adverse effects• Totallossof,ormajoralteration,

obstruction or intrusion to views.• Majornegativechangetothe

balance or composition of views.• Introductionofuncharacteristic

elements that would dominate the view.

Beneficial effects• Totalormajorrestorationor

enhancement of views. • Totalormajorlossofor

alteration to negative elements that detract from views.

• Majorpositivechangetothecomposition of views.

Adverse effects• Partiallossof,ormoderate

alteration, obstruction or intrusion to views.

• Moderatenegativechangetothebalance or composition of views.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would have a moderate negative influence on views.

Beneficial effects• Partialormoderaterestorationor

enhancement of views. • Partialormoderatelossor

alteration of negative elements that detract from views.

• Moderatepositivechangetothecomposition of views.

Adverse effects• Minorlossof,orsmallalteration,

obstruction or intrusion to views.• Minornegativechangetothe

balance or composition of views.• Introductionofuncharacteristic

elements that would have a minor negative influence on views.

Beneficial effects• Minorrestorationorenhancement

of views • Minorlossof,orminor

alteration of negative elements that detract from views.

• Minorpositivechangetothecomposition of views.

Adverse effects• Veryminorlossof,orsmall

alteration, obstruction or intrusion to views.

• Veryminornegativechangetothebalance or composition of views.

• Introductionofuncharacteristicelements that would have a very minor negative influence on views.

Beneficial effects• Veryminorrestorationor

enhancement of views. • Veryminorlossof,oralteration

of negative elements that detract from the view.

• Veryminorpositivechangetothecomposition of views.

The magnitude of change is determined by considering the following:

• distanceoftheviewpointfromtheproposals

• theangleofviewinrelationtothemainactivity of the receptor,

• theextentoftheareaoverwhichthechanges will be visible,

• thescaleofthechangewithrespecttothe loss or addition of features in the view and changes in its composition including the proportion of the view occupied by the proposed development,

• thedegreeofcontrastorintegrationofanynew features or changes in the landscape with the existing or remaining landscape elements and characteristics in terms of form, scale and mass, line, height, colour and texture,

• thedurationandnatureoftheeffect,temporary or permanent, intermittent or continuous

Northstowe

Figure 4.5 Impactmagnitude


Determinationofsignificancematrix – Visual change

Mag

nitu

de /

sca

le o

f cha

nge

Large

Med

ium

Small

Neg

ligib

le

High Medium NegligibleLow

Sensitivity of receptor

Negligible effect

Slight effect

Moderate effect

Substantial effect

Very substantial

effect

Degrees of effect Verysubstantial: Large change to a receptor of high sensitivity.

Substantial: Medium-large change to a receptor of medium-high sensitivity, medium change to a receptor of high sensitivity or large change to a receptor of medium sensitivity.

Moderate: Medium change to a receptor of medium sensitivity, large change to a receptor of low sensitivity or small change to a receptor of high sensitivity.

Slight: Medium or small change to a receptor of low sensitivity or small change to a receptor of medium sensitivity.

Negligible: Negligible, small, medium or large change to a receptor of negligible sensitivity or negligible change to a receptor of low, medium or high sensitivity.

SignificanceIf the degree of effect is moderate or above, then the effect is considered to be significant.

In some cases, the judgement of sensitivity or magnitude of change may fall somewhere between two descriptions, for instance a magnitude of change may be considered to be greater than small but less than medium and in these cases it is acceptable to describe these instances as lying between the two, in this instance, small-medium. It is also acceptable to describe effects in the same way, if it is considered that the effect lies between two effect descriptions.

Northstowe

Figure 4.6 Degree of effect


0 50 100 200m25

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5

H179

H188

H182

H184 G

174

H169

G38

H129

H130

H131

H110

G116

H91

H15

H34H35

G17

H24

H154

H165

H166

H154

H163

G16

G3

H173

G57

G49

G48

G42

G51

T44T40

T19-22,T25

T27, T29-33

G26

G6

G8

T5 G1G4

G13T14

T11 T9

G2

G155

G153

G152

G76

T80G145 G143

G102

G109

G107

G125T124

G175

G187

G180

G61

G59

T56T55

G52

G64

T73T71

T18

T90

G89

G92

G147

G156

Planning application boundary

Field

Golf Club

Road

Farm track

Signif icant tree/tree group

Signif icant hedgerows

Non signif icant trees/hedgerows

Site photo location

Everdene House Deansleigh Road Bournemouth BH7 7DU telephone 01202 421142 facsimile 01202 430055 email [email protected]

© Terence O’Rourke

Do not scale from this drawing

Dec 2011

Draft

Northstowe Phase 1: Landscape

Northstowe

1:5000@A3

Fig 4.1

revision

drawn by

SWD

checked by

PW

features & site photo locations

Gallagher

Key

S12

S2

S1

S3

S4

S5

S9a

S8

S5

S6

S9b

S7

S10S11

S12

Environmental statement Chapter 4 Landscape and visual effectsNorthstowe

Figure 4.7 Site appraisal and site photograph viewpoint locations


Field

Golf Club

Road

Farm track

Significant tree / tree group

Significant hedgerows

Non significant trees / hedgerows

Site photo location

Key

Based upon the 2011 Ordnance Survey 1:50000scale raster map with the permission of the OrdnanceSurvey on behalf of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,© Crown copyright. Terence O’Rourke Ltd.Licence No. AL100017826.

m

100

0 50 100 200m25

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5H179

H188

H182

H184 G

174

H169

G38

H129

H130

H131

H110

G116

H91

H15

H34H35

G17

H24

H154

H165

H166

H154

H163

G16

G3

H173

G57

G49

G48

G42

G51

T44T40

T19-22,T25

T27, T29-33

G26

G6

G8

T5 G1G4

G13T14

T11 T9

G2

G155

G153

G152

G76

T80G145 G143

G102

G109

G107

G125T124

G175

G187

G180

G61

G59

T56T55

G52

G64

T73T71

T18

T90

G89

G92

G147

G156


Field

Golf Club

Road

Farm track

Signif icant tree/tree group

Signif icant hedgerows

Non signif icant trees/hedgerows

Site photo location

Everdene House Deansleigh Road Bournemouth BH7 7DU telephone 01202 421142 facsimile 01202 430055 email [email protected]

© Terence O’Rourke

Do not scale from this drawing

Dec 2011

Draft

Northstowe Phase 1: Landscape

Northstowe

1:5000@A3

Fig 4.1

revision

drawn by

SWD

checked by

PW

features & site photo locations

Gallagher

Key

S12

S2

S1

S3

S4

S5

S9a

S8

S5

S6

S9b

S7

S10S11

S12

ARTWORKER NOTE: SITE PHOTOS CAN BE SCALED SO THEY FIT TO A3 BUT RESPRESENTATIVE VIEWPOINTS MUST BE SHIOWN AT 100%

12/11

Site photos 1 & 2

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.2Golf Course PROW

Gallagher Estates

© Terence O’Rourke Ltd

S2 View south west from public footpath through golf course 150m east of site boundary with Longstanton.

Vegetation on boundary with MagdaleneClose area

S1 View south from public footpath through golf course 120m north of site boundary.

Vegetation on boundary with ThornhillPlace and school

Trees within golf course Vegetation on boundary with school


Figure 4.8 Site photographs S1 and S2



Figure 4.9 Site photographs S3 and S4


12/11

Site photos 5, 6, 7 and 8

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.4Golf course area

Gallagher Estates


S5 General view of golf course vegetation

Vegetation on boundary with ThornhillPlace and school

Vegetation on boundary with school

S6 General view of golf course vegetation

S7 General view of golf course ponds S8 View from f ield A3 looking north towards CGB crossing Station Road


Figure 4.10 Site photographs S5, S6, S7, and S8


12/11

Site photos 9a and 9b

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.5

The site adjacent to the CGBGallagher Estates


S9a View south west from CGB over f ield A2 towards the golf course.

Trees within Golf course

Vegetation on boundary with school

S9b View south east from CGB over f ield A2 towards the golf course and park and ride.

Park and ride

Trees within Golf course


Figure 4.11 Site photographs S9a and S9b


12/11

Site photos S10, S11 & S12

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.6Site adjacent to Rampton Road

Gallagher Estates


S10 View north east along Rampton Road towards the CGB.

Trees within Golf course visible beyondH154

S12 View north from Rampton Road into Field A1 on eastern side of site.

Field A1

Hedge H166 on easternmostboundary of site Hedge H166 on easternmost boundary of

siteCGB crossing point

S11 View south west along Rampton Road towards Longstanton.


Figure 4.12 Site photographs S10, S11 and S12

%2

%2%2%2

%2

%2

%2%2

%2 %2 Pillboxes

Rights of Way

Registered village greens

Permissive access

Listed buildings

Ancient woodland

Registered parks andgardens

Scheduled monuments

Special Protection Areaand Ramsar site

Special Area of Conservation

Local Nature Reserve

Site of Special ScientificInterest

Site boundary

I2

km

Based upon the 2011 Ordnance Survey 1:50000 scale raster map with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of Her Majesty's Stationery Office,© Crown copyright. Terence O'Rourke Ltd. Licence No. AL100017826.

Key

7.5 km


Figure 4.13 Landscape context, designations and public rights of way

10

40

50

60

30

10

20

10

70

10

60

60

10

10

20

20

20

10

30

60

20

60

30

20

10

10

10

20

10

40

20

20

10

20

1010

60

10

20

40

30

40

10

50

60

20

10

10

10

30

40

10

60

Site boundary

I2

km


Key

7.5km


Figure 4.14 Topography

Site boundary

Key

2

Based upon the 2011 Ordnance Survey 1:50000scale raster map with the permission of the OrdnanceSurvey on behalf of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,© Crown copyright. Terence O’Rourke Ltd.Licence No. AL100017826.

km

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ● Lowland Village Chalklands

Wooded Village Farmlands

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

Lowland Village Farmlands

Valley Meadowlands

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

Planned Peat Fen

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

Planned Silt Fen

Urban

Site boundary

I2

km


Key

7.5 km


Figure 4.15 Landscape character areas

12.5m ZVI

Woodland

Site boundary

I2

km


Key

7.5km


Figure 4.16 Zone of theoretical visibility of proposals

7.5km 3 km 1 km

1

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

11

1213

141516

1718

19 2021

22

23

3

4

2524

10/11

Viewpoints Location Plan

Northstowe1:60000@A3

155316 Figure -7.5km extent

Gallagher Estates


Refer to viewpoints plan - 1km extent


Figure 4.17 Representative view locations – wider area


Figure 4.18 Representative view locations – local area

ARTWORKER NOTE: SITE PHOTOS CAN BE SCALED SO THEY FIT TO A3 BUT REPRESENTATIVE VIEWPOINTS MUST BE SHIOWN AT 100%


12/11

Viewpoint 1

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.19Aldreth Road

Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 1. View south from road at Aldreth 7.3km north east of site. grid reference X:544947 / Y:273833

Communications mast (8.5km)and Willingham Church spire

(5.5km) (St Marys and All Saints)

Approximateextent of site

Steeple of Church of AllSaints Longstanton

Distance and layering of hedgerows and tree groups makes site vegetation indistinguishable from other distant features. Recognisible features perceptible but not prominent are the communication tower at Gravel Bridge Road, the church spires at Willingham and Long Stanton. The ridge of high ground west of Cambridge along the A428 forms the distant skyline.

Figure 4.19 Representative viewpoint 1




American cemetery chapel

American cemetery ground level

12/11

Viewpoint 2


American Cemetery ChapelGallagher Estates


Communications mast at GravelBridge Road visible on skyline

Representative viewpoint 2. View north from American Cemetery Memorial Chapel on A1303 west of Cambridge 7.3km south of site.Trees north of the cemetery partially obscures the panorama preventing a clear view of the open landscape. grid reference X:540584 / Y:259543

Woodland at Oakington andLongstanton on distant skyline



Figure 4.21 Representative viewpoint 312/11

Viewpoint 3


South of BoxworthGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 3. View north east from farmland south of Boxworth, 6.7km south west of site. grid reference X:534510 / Y:262938

Longstanton visible beyond Lolworth

Approximate extent of site

Lolworth/The Grange




Tipplers Rd

12/11

Viewpoint 4


Tipplers RoadGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 4. View from Tipplers Road (Byway) 3.7km west of site. grid reference X:536010 / Y:266682

Communications mast at Gravel Bridge Road Church of All Saints, Longstanton




12/11

Viewpoint 5


Belsars Hill (nr)Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 5. View south west from Iram Drove, east of Willingham, 2.9km north east of site. grid reference X:542711 / Y:270015




12/11

Viewpoint 6


Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 6. View south from Rampton Road near Mistletoe Farm east of Willingham 1.4km north of site. grid reference. X:541264 / Y:269079

Airf ield water towerSteeple of Church of All Saints

Longstanton


Communications mast atGravel Bridge Road



12/11

Viewpoint 9


Rampton Drift 1Gallagher Estates


Rampton Rd drift 1

Representative viewpoint 9. View north west from Rampton Drift (Byway) 1.4km south east of the site. grid reference X:542432/ Y:266218

Water tower

Steeple of Church of All Saints, Longstanton

Communications mast atGravel Bridge Road


Rampton DriftVegetation along route of Cambridge guided bus



Guns Lane

12/11

Viewpoint 10


Guns LaneGallagher Estates


representative viewpoint 10.View north west from Guns Lane 2.5km south east of the site north east of Westwick. grid reference X:542779 / Y:265280Site obscured by intervening vegetation


Airf ield water tower



12/11

Viewpoint 13


Ramper Road/Over Rd JunctionGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 13. View east from Ramper Road at junction with Over Road 600m west of site. grid reference X:538868 / Y:267532

New residential development onwestern edge of Longstanton




Viewpoint 16


Golf Course PROWGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 16. View south west from public footpath at western side of golf course. grid reference X:539907 / Y:267506



Viewpoint 17

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.35View from PROW on Golf Course

Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 17. View north west from public footpath through golf course. grid reference X:539937 / Y:267083

Hedgerow on site and golf course boundary



Viewpoint 18


View from PROW in Golf CourseGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 18. View north west from public footpath at eastern side of golf course. grid reference X:539984 / Y:266862



footpath opp magdalen close

12/11

Viewpoint 19


Magdalene CloseGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 19. View north east from public footpath opposite Magdalene Close. grid reference X:540154 / Y:266656

Hedgerow forming site boundary andeastern boundary of the golf course Vegetation at Larksf ield nursery Vegetation along Rampton Road



Rampton Rd 3

12/11

Viewpoint 20


Rampton Road 3Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 20. View from Rampton Road 200m south of site. grid reference X:540291 / Y:266703



12/11

Viewpoint 21

Northstowe 155316 Figure 4.39Rampton Road 2

Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 21. View from Rampton Road south west of Brookf ield Farm 0.3km south of the site. grid reference X:540711 / Y:266964

Housing at Rampton Drift Boundary with Larksf ield (nursery) Site boundary (golf course boundary hedge)

Brookf ield Farm



Representative viewpoint 22. View from Rampton Road at eastern edge of the site. grid reference X:540949 / Y:267116

Rampton Road towards Longstanton Farm yard not included in the site Field included within the site

12/11

Viewpoint 22


Rampton Road 1Gallagher Estates


Rampton Lane towards CGB




12/11

Viewpoint 7


Rampton Road Mill FieldGallagher Estates


Rampton Rd Mill Field

Representative viewpoint 7. View from Rampton Road west of Rampton 1km north east of the site. grid reference X:541770 / Y:268400

Airf ield water tower Steeple of Church of All Saints Longstanton



Community wood Cottenham

Gravel Hill

12/11

Viewpoint 8


Community Wood CottenhamGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 8. View west from Rampton Road west of Cottenham, 2.5km east of site. grid reference X:543838 / Y:267774

Steeple of Church of All SaintsLongstanton on skyline




12/11

Viewpoint 11


Bar Hill A14 JunctionGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 11. View north from B1050 junction with A11 at Bar Hill 3km south of the site. grid reference X:538269 / Y:264223

Mast near Bar Farm Church of All Saints Longstanton

Approximateextent of site




Ramper Rd @ footpath end

Ramper Rd nr Highf iled Fm

12/11

Viewpoint 12


Ramper Road at Footpath endGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 12. View east from Ramper Road 1.5km west of site. grid reference X:538033 / Y:267418


New residential development on west side ofLongstanton against background of trees in village




B1050 from P&R access

12/11

Viewpoint 14


B1050 from P&R accessGallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 14. View south east from B1050 at junction with park and ride grid reference X:539886 / Y:267935

New park and ride access road Station RoadDrainage attenuation pond

Golf course vegetation screening views towards Longstanton






Reynold Drove 1

12/11

Viewpoint 23


Reynold Drove 1Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 23. View west from Reynold Drove 150m north east of the site. grid reference X:541399 / Y:267450

CGB crossing to Rampton RoadScrub along CGB route screening

north western part of site WillinghamTrees at Longstanton




CGB 2 nr RR

12/11

Viewpoint 25


CGB 1Gallagher Estates


Representative viewpoint 25. View south from CGB adjacent to site boundary. grid reference X:540649 / Y:267785

Vegetation on edges ofRampton in middle distance Public footpath/cycleway Cambridge guided bus (CGB) Hedgerow and tracks through golf course

Longstanton screened by vegetation on village edge Park and Ride

Sensitivity of receptor – LandscapeA landscape known and cherished by many people from across the...

Documents

Transcript of Sensitivity of receptor – LandscapeA landscape known and cherished by many people from across the...