Seg Revenue Recognition Slides
-
Upload
whitleypenn -
Category
Design
-
view
726 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Seg Revenue Recognition Slides
Extreme Makeover -
Revenue Recognition
Joint Project of the
FASB and IASB
Revenue from contracts with customers
Learning Objectives
• Provide history behind and current status of the new revenue accounting rules
• Review the new five-step recognition model
• Illustrate key concepts through examples
• Impact considerations and next steps
History – Why the Shift to a New Framework?
Objectives of the FASB & IASB…
• One global standard for revenue accounting and reporting
• Currently IFRS guidance is not extensive – users often refer to US GAAP for specific guidance
• Currently US GAAP guidance is comprised of 1) over-riding guidelines established by the SEC, and 2) industry specific bright line rules
• Inconsistencies exist between industries
• New standard designed to promote consistency and comparability across industries and capital markets
Timeline & Current Status
• Project began in 2006
• Initial Exposure Draft Issued 2010
• Revised Exposure Draft Issued November 14, 2011
• Final Standard Expected in early 2013
• Effective Date – fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2015
• Full Retrospective Application – therefore public companies must start complying in 2013 to facilitate on time adoption
Identify the contract(s) with the customer Step 1
5 Step Revenue Recognition Model
Step 2 Identify separate performance obligations in the contract
Step 3 Determine transaction price and amounts not expected to be collected
Step 4 Allocate transaction price to the separate performance obligations
Step 5 Recognize revenue when goods and services are transferred to the customer and performance obligations are complete
Identify the contract(s) with the customer Step 1
Issue Key Considerations
Combining Contracts
If separate contracts were negotiated together for one purpose
If price interdependence exists between two otherwise separate contractual arrangements
If performance links exist between two separate contracts – one combined performance obligation may exist
Modifications Combine with initial contract, unless… Modification creates new and separate
performance obligation The price = stand-alone selling price for that
performance obligation
Modification – Illustrative Example
•On January 1, Company A contracts to sell 20 truck bodies to Company B at a price of $9,000 per unit for a total transaction value of $180,000 (standard price is $10,000 per unit).
•Truck bodies will be delivered in 2 equal shipments on January 31 and March 31.
•On March 1, Company A modifies the contract to add an additional 10 truck bodies to Company B for $100,000.
Combine or Separate?
Modification was made in close proximity to original contract
Unfulfilled performance obligation remained from original contract
No price interdependence – modification sold at list price
The March 1st modification represents a stand alone performance obligation
Answer: Separate
Modification – Illustrative Example
•On January 1, Company A contracts to sell 20 truck bodies to Company B at a price of $9,000 per unit for a total transaction value of $180,000 (standard price is $10,000 per unit).
•Contract defines discount structure for future purchases
•On March 1, Company A modifies the contract to add 10 additional truck bodies to Company B for $80,000 to be delivered June 30th (pursuant to the defined discount structure).
Combine or Separate?
Modification was made in close proximity to original contract
Unfulfilled performance obligation remained from original contract
Price interdependence does exist – original contract defines discount structure
Answer: Combine
Step 2 Identify separate performance obligations in the contract
Issue Key Considerations
How do we identify performance obligations?
If goods and services are “distinct” Distinct means…
Good or service is sold separately Good or service has stand alone value to
customer
When should goods and services be bundled together?
If both of the following criteria are met… Goods and services are highly interrelated
and seller provides significant service of integrating goods and services on customer’s behalf
Seller is engaged by buyer to significantly modify or customize the goods or services for buyer’s use
Step 2 Identify separate performance obligations in the contract
Issue Key Considerations
How are warranties accounted for under the new standard?
Current accounting guidance calls for cost accruals for all warranties
Under new guidance, warranties that are sold separately represent a separate performance obligation
Warranties that meet the definition of performance obligation will be subject to an allocated portion of the transaction price based upon relative stand-alone sales prices
Step 3 Determine transaction price and amounts not expected to be collected
Issue Key Considerations
What is the impact of variable consideration on revenue recognition?
Examples include rebates, credits, performance bonuses, contingent consideration (royalties)
Generally, current US GAAP defers recognition until contingency is fulfilled
The new standard will require management to estimate variable consideration
As a result, many organizations will recognize revenue related to variable consideration sooner
Aspect of the new standard that will generally increase revenue
Aspect of the new standard that will generally decrease revenue
Variable Consideration – Illustrative Example
•Company A provides an outsourced service to its customers. Typical contracts include a scaled performance bonus related to efficiency metrics achieved within a defined timeframe.
•Management estimates its performance bonus under a new contract as follows:
50% Chance of $100,000 = $50,000 25% Chance of $50,000 = $12,500 25% Chance of $0 = $0
Probability weighted estimate approach is utilized
Under current US GAAP, Company A would not recognize any revenue related to the performance bonus until the precise amount earned becomes known (fixed and determinable fee requirement)
Under the new standard, Company A will include $62,500 in the total transaction value to be allocated to the performance obligations
Step 3 Determine transaction price and amounts not expected to be collected
Issue Key Considerations
How is collection risk accounted for under the new standard?
Under current US GAAP collectibility is a pre-requisite for revenue recognition
Under the new standard, collectibility risk will not preclude revenue recognition
Management will estimate impairment loss on receivables and deduct from gross revenue on face of income statement
Under current US GAAP bad debt expense does not reduce gross margin
Under the new standard, recorded impairment losses will reduce gross margin
Aspect of the new standard that will generally increase revenue
Aspect of the new standard that will generally decrease revenue
Collectibility– Illustrative Example
Current Accounting
•Company A operates as a business to consumer products seller.
•Typical customer sales transactions total $5,000
•Cost of sales per transaction is $3,000
•Historic bad debt write-offs at 10%
New Standard
Revenue $5,000
Cost of Sales $3,000
Gross Margin $2,000
Gross Margin % 40%
Bad Debt Expense $500
Revenue $5,000
Impairment Loss (500)
Net Revenue $4,500
Cost of Sales $3,000
Gross Margin $1,500
Gross Margin % 30%
Bad Debt Expense $0
Step 4 Allocate transaction price to the separate performance obligations
Issue Key Considerations
How do we allocate the transaction price?
Based on relative stand alone sales prices If a stand-alone sales price is not available then
management must estimate the price at which it would sell that good or service
Under current US GAAP (in particular in the software sector), absence of VSOE of fair value generally results in revenue deferrals
Estimation methods can include… Cost plus a reasonable margin Market prices for similar goods and services Residual method
Aspect of the new standard that will generally increase revenue
Aspect of the new standard that will generally decrease revenue
Transaction Price Allocation – Illustrative Example
•Company A is a electronics products and services company.
• It has entered into a contract with a customer that includes multiple performance obligations including:
•Electronic component products – Stand-alone price is $100,000
Performance Obligation
Stand-alone price
Discount Factor ($150,000 / $160,000)
Allocated Price
Electronic components $100,000 93.8% $93,750
Design services $50,000 93.8% $46,875
Extended warranty $10,000 93.8% $9,375
Totals $160,000 $150,000
•100 Hours of Design Service – Stand-alone price is $500 per hour ($50,000)
•Extended warranty – Stand-alone price is $10,000
•Contract value is $150,000
Residual Method Example – Illustrative Example
Performance Obligation Stand-alone price
Discount Factor ($175,000 / $175,000)
Allocated Price
Electronic components $100,000 100% $100,000
Design services $50,000 100% $50,000
Extended warranty $10,000 100% $10,000
NEW special component $15,000 100% $15,000
Totals $175,000 $175,000
• Assume the same fact pattern as in the previous example
• In addition to the 3 electronic components noted previously, Company A will also manufacture and deliver a custom component built to the customer’s specifications that it has never before built nor sold separately
•Assume contract value is $175,000
Modification / Price Allocation – Illustrative Example
•On January 1, Company A contracts to sell 20 truck bodies to Company B at a price of $9,000 per unit for a total transaction value of $180,000 (standard price is $10,000 per unit).
•Contract defines discount structure for future purchases
•On March 1, Company A modifies the contract to add 10 additional truck bodies to Company B for $80,000 to be delivered June 30th (pursuant to the defined discount structure).
Date Revenue Note
January 31st $90,000 Delivery of first 10 truck bodies
March 31st $83,333 Second 10 trucks delivered (cumulative catch up)
June 30th $86,667 Last 10 trucks delivered
Totals $260,000 Combined transaction value now fully recognized
Impact
Unlike current US GAAP, the new standard’s contract modification feature is likely to result in adjustments to revenue recorded on performance obligations that have already been recognized
Aspect of the new standard that will generally decrease revenue
Step 5 Recognize revenue when goods and services are transferred to the customer and performance obligations are complete
Issue Key Considerations
When is a performance obligation satisfied?
Promised good or service is transferred to the customer
Control is the key concept to understand Control is the ability to direct the use of and
receive the benefit from the good and service
Practice Aid – Indicators that control has passed to customer
• Customer has unconditional obligation to pay
• Customer has legal title to goods • Customer has physical possession of
the goods
• Customer bears the risks and rewards of ownership
• Customer formally accepts goods or service
Step 5 Recognize revenue when goods and services are transferred to the customer and performance obligations are complete
Issue Key Considerations
How is the passage of control viewed for service companies?
Original exposure draft did not make a distinction on passage of control for service companies
Now the new standard includes the concept of “continuous” passage of control
A performance obligation is satisfied continuously if… Seller’s performance creates or enhances an
asset that the customer controls, or Seller’s performance does not create an asset
with alternative use
Unlike current US GAAP, the new standard requires the capitalization of incremental costs incurred to obtain a contract if they are expected to be recovered
Contract Costs
Other Important Highlights of the New Standard
• Applies to performance obligations satisfied over 1 year or more
• Assessed at performance obligation level – not contract level
• Onerous = lowest cost of settling the performance obligation exceeds the amount of the transaction price allocated
Onerous Performance Obligations
Financial Statement Disclosures
• The disaggregation of revenue into primary categories that depict the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
• A tabular reconciliation of the movements of the assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer
• An analysis of the entity's remaining performance obligations including the nature of the goods and services to be provided, timing of satisfaction, and significant payment terms
• Information on onerous performance obligations and a tabular reconciliation of the movements in the corresponding liability for the current reporting period
• Significant judgments and changes in judgments that affect the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with customers
SAB Topic 13 Impact of IASB / FASB Exposure Draft
Persuasive evidence of arrangement
Contracts may be combined if highly interrelated or price interdependent
Identify performance obligations for distinct goods or services (distinct generally means “sold separately”)
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered
Satisfaction of performance obligations triggers recognition
Customer must obtain control of the promised good or service
Distinction between goods and services now added in new exposure draft – services subject to continuous control passage guidance
Warranties (that can be purchased) are now treated as a performance obligation not as a liability
Comparison to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 (formerly SAB No. 104)
SAB Topic 13 Impact of IASB / FASB Exposure Draft
The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable
Transaction price is the amount of consideration expected to be received from the customer
Allocate the transaction price to all distinct performance obligations proportionally based on stand alone selling price
Estimates of selling prices for distinct goods or services not sold separately will replace vendor specific objective evidence criterion
Estimates will be incorporated when variable consideration exists
Collectibility is reasonably assured
Collection risk reflected as reduction of revenue rather than bad debt – gross margins will be reduced
Transactions falling short of SAB Topic 13 threshold may no longer result in revenue deferrals
Comparison to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 (formerly SAB No. 104)
Next Steps
• The accounting and disclosure requirements of the new revenue standard are significant
• The impact will be greatest for companies with complex revenue arrangements, bundled contracts and long term engagements
• Stay up to date on the evolving standard requirements and seek out training opportunities
• Conduct an impact assessment in order to prepare for the transition
• The retrospective transition provision means compliance may need to start as soon as 2013
SolomonEdwards At a Glance
SolomonEdwardsGroup, LLC (SolomonEdwards or SEG) is a national
business advisory and professional staffing firm. Our customized solutions
provide our clients with the right combination of talent and expertise to
achieve their business objectives.
With practices specialized in Accounting & Finance and Banking &
Financial Services, our strength lies in our ability to tactically assist clients
with special projects, transaction support & integration, business process
optimization initiatives, and regulatory compliance requirements.
Because we provide both business advisory and staffing services, SEG can
customize a solution for each client we serve. If you need an individual to
fill a role on an interim or permanent basis, a large team to execute a
project initiative, or expert consultation on a technical issue, we can help.
We operate from seven offices in major cities throughout the country and
maintain a global network of partners to serve multinational clients.
Our Services & Solutions
Our core service capabilities encompass business advisory, project
management, interim staffing and professional search. We deliver our
services to our clients across a spectrum of functional and industry verticals
that enables us to provide the specific expertise and methodologies required
to deliver outstanding results.
Our Services & Solutions
Interim CFO & Controller
General Ledger Accounting &
Reporting
Financial Modeling
Financial System Assessment &
Optimization
Business Process Improvement
Policy & Procedure Development
Business Intelligence Tools
Financial Planning & Analysis
Budgeting & Forecasting
Shared Service Center Support
Project Management Office
Due Diligence
Merger Integration
Financial Carve-out
IPO Readiness
Bankruptcy & Turnaround
Technical Accounting
US GAAP & IFRS Advisory
SEC Reporting & Compliance
Sarbanes-Oxley
Internal Audit Services
Technology Risk
Accounting
& Finance
Business
Process
Optimization
Transaction
Support &
Integration
Regulatory
Compliance
The Value of SEG
Client Need Defined…
Ownership Change
Mergers & Acquisitions
IPO’s
Leveraged Buyout
Private Equity investment
Delivering the talent and know-how to execute due
diligence, merger integration, technical accounting,
SEC reporting, IPO readiness, SOX compliance and
more. SEG can mobilize and manage resources for
special projects, provide professionals to back-fill
positions during the change process or recruit talent
to fill roles on a permanent basis.
SEG’s Value…
Representative Clients…
Acqura Loan Services, Inc. Exelon Power Hexion Specialty Chemicals Talk America
Comcast Corporation Frontier Telecommunications PanAmSat Corporation Terra Nova Financial Group
Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. Graftech, Inc. Olympus Power, LLC Verso Paper, Inc.
The Value of SEG
Client Need Defined…
Compliance
SEC Reporting
Financial Restatements
US GAAP / IFRS
Sarbanes - Oxley
Bank Compliance
SEG’s Value…
Delivering the talent and know-how to enable our
clients to comply with applicable regulations across of
broad spectrum of issues. SEG can serve as a
technical advisor, mobilize and manage resources
for compliance initiatives, provide professionals to
augment client teams during peak compliance
periods, or recruit talent to fill permanent roles.
Representative Clients…
ABN AMRO E.ON Climate & Renewables Franklin Bank Leo Burnett USA, Inc.
Amerisafe, Inc. FIMAT USA, Inc. GMH Communities Parsons Brinckerhoff
Cambridge Display Tech Foote, Cone & Belding Integra Life Sciences Whitney Bank
The Value of SEG
Client Need Defined…
Business Growth / Downturn -
Start-up Operations
New Management
Resource Constraints
Employee Turnover
Bankruptcy / Turnaround
SEG’s Value…
Delivering the talent and know-how to enable an
organization to evolve with changing business and
economic circumstances. SEG can quickly provide
resources with the right experience to deliver results
on an interim basis, back-fill vacant positions, or
recruit talent to fill permanent positions from staff to
senior executive levels.
Representative Clients…
Airtricity Corporation Children’s Network, LLC Gamesa Technology Corp. Sandler O’Neill
Ascend Acquisition Corp. CHI-X / Instinet Greatwide Logistics Services Symmetry Holdings
Alaron Futures/Options Foamex International Newtek Business Services Vantium Capital
For More Information
Brian G. Markley, CPA Partner
[email protected] Office: 610-902-0440 Mobile: 484-557-0933
Richard A. Lavinski, CPA Partner
[email protected] Office Phone: 972-505-2002
Mobile: 214-733-6103
SolomonEdwardsGroup, LLC 14755 Preston Road, Suite 400
Dallas, Texas 75254