Section C Maranion – Mendoza. Subjective Pertinent PositivePertinent Negative 28 y/o female CC:...
-
Upload
clifton-flynn -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Section C Maranion – Mendoza. Subjective Pertinent PositivePertinent Negative 28 y/o female CC:...
Evidence Based MedicineClinical Management of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Section C Maranion – Mendoza
Case:
Subjective
Pertinent Positive Pertinent Negative
•28 y/o female•CC: Hemoptysis•Chronic cough
• No weight change• No change in eating habits
•2 months PTC:
•Coughing intermittently (last 2 mos)•Cough = productive of scanty whitish to yellowish sputum• Occasionally took ginger ale afforded temporary relief• 1 month PTC:
•Intermittent low grade fever, malaise and night sweats
• Recently: back pains, blood-streaked sputum
Salient features
• 28 y/o female• Chronic cough & Hemoptysis• Cough = productive of scanty whitish
to yellowish sputum• Intermittent low grade fever, malaise
and night sweats• back pains• No weight change
Evidence Based Approach
Diagnosis
Treatment
Possible Harm
Prognosis
1.Clinical impression2.Most probable diagnosis3.Critical appraisal of an article
about a diagnostic test
DIAGNOSIS
Karmi Margaret MarcialMichelle MatematicoEvangelyn Grace MatiasMarienelle Maulion
Clinical Impression
Bronchiectasis Lung Cancer Tuberculosis
Chief complaint:Hemoptysis
Page _______Diagnosis - 1
Differential DiagnosisT. B. (The Patient ) Bronchiectasis Lung Cancer Pulmonary
Tuberculosis
28 y/o, female Higher incidence adolescence and early adulthood. Higher incidence in 25-34 y/o female
Chronic cough(yellow sputum)
persistent orrecurrent cough and purulent sputum production
cough,
hemoptysis,
post-obstructive pneumonitis (fever and productive cough).
Cough (purulentSputum)
Hemoptysis Hemoptysis occursin 50 to 70% of cases
Hemoptysis (can be massive)Blood streaking of the sputum is frequently documented
Low grade fever Fever Fever (oftenlow-grade and intermittent)
Malaise, Night sweats General malaise and weakness, Night sweats
(-) weight loss / change in eating habits
Weight loss Weight loss and anorexia
Probability 50% 30% 60%
Testing Thresholds and Pre-Test Probabilities
10%
80%
60%
TB
10%
80%
50%
Bronchiectasis
10%
90%
30%
Lung CA
0%
100%
10% 80%
60%
TB
MOST PROBABLE DIAGNOSIS:
Script page
In this scenario, we consider the probability the probability of ____% that the patient has TB.
We also consider institutional care for these patients if the probability is _______%
Maybe home intervention if probability is _____%
Assessment of Clinical Scenario
Diagnostic options for TB
Diagnostic techniques
Page _______
Search
Candidate Journals
Clinical scenario or question
What is the accuracy of HRCT or CXR in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis?
The Article
***
Validity
Was there an independent, blind comparison with a reference standard?
Yes. The pulmonologist and radiologist who independently interpreted the HRCTs were unaware of the patients’ clinical condition.
Critical Apprai
sal
Validity
Was the diagnostic test evaluated in an appropriate spectrum of patients (like those in whom we would use it in practice?)
Yes. In a 2500-bed medical center in Southern Taiwan, the study group of 157 with suggestive CXR consisted of 33 women and 124 men with an age range of 20 to 83 years.
Critical Apprai
sal
Validity
Was the reference standard applied regardless of the diagnostic test result?
Yes. Sputum culture and AFB smear microscopy were performed in diagnosing active PTB prior to subjecting the patients to HRCT.
Critical Apprai
sal
Validity
Was the test validated in a second, independent group of patients?
No. Chest X-ray and HRCT were performed on the same set patients.
Critical Apprai
sal
Clinical Importance
What is the sensitivity? CXR: 57% HRCT: 89% What is the specificity? CXR: 28% HRCT:85% Can you calculate a likelihood ratio,
or is there one already calculated? Yes. It can be calculated in CXR and
HRCT
Critical Apprai
sal
Clinical Importance: Xray
Page _______
Clinical Importance: Xray
Sensitivity = 57% Specificity = 28% LR+ = 0.80 LR- = 1.52
(+) Dse (-) Dse Total
Xray (+) 32 66 98
Xray (-) 24 26 50
Total 56 92 148
Clinical Importance: Xray
Testing Thresholds: X-ray
Positive Post-Test Probability = 55% Negative Post-Test Probability = 70%
10% 80%
60%
TB
55% 70%
Clinical Importance: HRCT
Page _______
Clinical Importance: HRCT
Sensitivity = 89% Specificity = 85% LR+ = 5.81 LR- = 0.13
(+) Dse (-) Dse Total
HRCT (+) 56 13 69
HRCT (-) 7 72 79
Total 63 85 148
Clinical Importance: HRCT
Testing Thresholds: HRCT
Positive Post-Test Probability = 90% Negative Post-Test Probability = 16%
Xray HRCT
10% 80%
60%
TB
55% (+)
70% (-)
90% (+)
19% (+)
Applicability
In our practice, is the test:
Available? Yes. It is available in USTH.
Affordable? No. HRCT plain costs P 8000; with contrast P15,275.
Accurate? Yes. The accuracy of the test based on the pulmonologist’s interpretation is 86% and radiologist’s interpretation is 90%.
Precise? Yes.
Critical Apprai
sal
Applicability
Can we generate a reasonable pre-test probability in our clinical scenario?
Yes. The pre-test probability was generated based on the manifestation of the patient.
Are the study patients similar to our own? Yes. The study patients are similar on our own,
using the patient’s age and gender as the basis.
Has anything changed since the study was published?
None.
Critical Apprai
sal
Applicability
Will the resultant post-test probabilities change our management?
Yes. It will lead the physician decide to give the treatment or not.
Critical Apprai
sal
TREATMENT
Jhudielle MedenillaKristianne Rachelle MedinaCarmelou Mae Mejino
HARM
Ivy MelgarejoAlvin MendozaDonne Paolo Mendoza
PROGNOSIS
Ma. Cristina MaranionEric John MarayagPamela Marcelo