Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Introduc tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Sec tion 1: Sec tor Profi le Energy Use in Breweries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

Sec tion 2: Data Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9

Sec tion 3: Usage & Reduc tion Best Prac tices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

Sec tion 4: Onsite Renewable Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42

Sec tion 5: Brewery Case Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46

Appendix A: Tool Box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52Selec ted Web Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53

1. Segment Profi le:

2. Da ta Managem ent:

3. Best Practices:

4. Onsite Energy Reduc tion:

5. Case Studies

Disc laimer: the following information provided constitute suggestions that may or may not fi t the need of each brewery spec ifi cally. Brewers should proceed with caution when implementing any new programs. It is not guaranteed that operating under the guidance of this manual will lead to any particular outcome or result.

1.1 Overview of Current Energy Use/ Greenhouse Gas Performance and Trends

Boiler house5%

Refrigera tion35%

Pac kaging25%

Other12%

Compressed a ir10%

Brewhouse7%

Lighting6%

Brewhouse45%

Pac kaging25%

Utilities20%

Spac e heating10%

A. Elec tric ity B. Natural gas

Refrigera tion6%

Sanita tion18%

HVAC28%

Food p repara tion35%

Lighting13%

Energy Consumption In Breweries (All Sizes)Data from the U.S. Environmenta l Protec tion Agency (EPA) show

tha t refrigera tion, packag ing and compressed a ire consume 70% of U.S. b reweries elec tric ity use (A), whereas the brewhouse

dominates na tura l gas and coa l use a t 45 percent (B).

Energy Consumption Within The Food Service Environment (Ifma 2009)

E Source; data from the U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency

Average Relative Energy Use

1.2 Regulatory Drivers

The EPA Mandatory GHG accounting rule applies to fac ilities from spec ifi c industries that d irec tly emit 25,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equiva lent or more per year. Assuming an average thermal requirement of 1.5 therms per barrel of produc tion and an emission fac tor of 5.29 kg CO2 emitted per therm, an average brewery would produce roughly 125 barrels of beer per metric ton of CO2 emitted. It is unlikely that c raft brewers under approximately 3 million barrels of annual produc tion would be susceptib le to this rule based on their size and operations. Natura lly this threshold would change if the EPA accounting rule limit changed.

1.3 Non-Regulatory Drivers Image/ Brand, Community Ties

Example Energy Effi c iency ProgramsITEM ENERGY STAR ISO 50001

Case Studies

Boulevard Brewery insta lled a zone control stra tegy in the Build ing Automation System. This system makes heating and cooling ad justments based on real-time requirements in each zone, while leaving unoccupied, non-c ritica l zones relaxed regard ing their temperature requirements.

In 2004, Vic tory Brewing Company upgraded their brewhouse with a system that recovers much of the primary energy fueling it. Approximately one-third of the natural gas burned to heat and boil beer is reta ined in the system for heating purposes, enabling them to reduce GHG emissions.

Standing Stone Brewery Sustainable Business Oregon award

Standing Stone Brewery efforts have received recognition, inc lud ing the State of Oregon Sustainability Award, Oregon Business 100 Best Green Businesses and Susta inable Business Oregons Susta inable Business Innovation award (Operations), as well as ongoing media spotlights.

New Belgium Brewery FortZED

As part of the FortZED (Zero Energy Distric t) projec t, Fort Collins, Colorado implemented a smart grid component of the c itys Zero Energy Distric t p lan. Fort Collins has begun implementing a smart grid projec t with partners from the Fort ZED consortium. The New Belgium Brewery is one of the test sites. The proposal to implement the smart grid is an $11.2 million projec t with $6 million coming from a Department of Energy grant. Colorado State University will a lso take part in the pilot.

1.4 Risks and Opportunities Energy/ Greenhouse Gas Reduc tion

2.1 Data Collec tion

Measurement Is the Key

The most important step in energy management and conservation is measuring and accounting for energy consumption.

GATHERINGEVIDENCE

READING AND ANALYSING DATA

TARGETSETTING

WORKING WITH DATA

Effec tive Data Management System

Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

100,00

90,000

80,000

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

Janu

ary

Febr

uary

Mar

chAp

ril

May

June July

Augu

stSe

ptem

ber

Nove

mbe

rDe

cem

ber

Elec tric a l kWh

Fuel kWh

Barrels Produc ed

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

Janu

ary

Febr

uary

March

April May

June July

Augu

stSe

ptem

ber

Nove

mbe

rDe

cem

ber

Elec trica l Cost

Fuel Cost

Barrels Produc ed

Da ta in this tabula r format p rovides a visua l reference of the b rewerys energy usage and cost compared to the number of p roduced beer ba rrels. Da ta can be graphed to better trend and understand usage and cost da ta .

Tabular Example of One Full Year of Data Collec tion

Energy Usage vs. Barrels Produced Trend Energy Cost vs. Barrels Produced Trend

Item Ja nua ry Februa ry Ma rch Ap ril May June July August Sep tem-b er

November Dec ember Tota ls

Elec tirca l kWh 40,000 45,000 39,000 39,500 50,000 50,000 40,000 35,000 40,000 42,000 30,000 450,500

Fuel kWh 90,000 92,000 80,000 75,000 72,000 73,000 72,000 65,000 67,000 75,000 85,000 846,000

Elec t Cost $4,000 $4,500 $3,900 $3,950 $5,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,200 $3,000 $45,050

Fuel Cost $1,800 $1,840 $1,600 $1,500 $1,440 $1,460 $1,440 $1,300 $1,340 $1,500 $1,700 $16,920

Tota l Enegy Cost $5,800 $6,340 $5,500 $5,450 $6,440 $6,460 $5,440 $4,800 $5,340 $5,700 $4,700 $61,970

Tota l Energy kWh 130,000 137,000 119,000 114,500 122,000 123,000 112,000 100,000 107,000 117,000 115,000 1,296,500

Management Tips When Measuring and Accounting For Energy Consumption

Consider developing meaningful energy performance indicators spec ifi c to your brewerys needs

Conduc t seminars or awareness sessions for a ll operators to expla in: The energy costs and the means of their

control The effec t of good housekeeping on driving

the energy costs down The importance of proper operational

prac tices Review the ind icators regularly at operations

management meetings Keep employees informed - communicate the

results Use the energy cost results in developing and

reviewing of business p lans, a lternate energy plans and capita l projec ts

Use the energy cost ind icators as a management tool to improve performance

Source: Canadian Brewers Assoc iation 2010 Energy Guide

2.3 Benchmarking Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Sierra Nevada Sustainability Report, Energy Monitoring

To track energy consumption and generation at the fac ility, we insta lled an energy monitoring system called Green Energy Management Systems (GEMS) that monitors solar output, a ll four fuel cells, purchased elec tric ity, and elec tric ity sold back to the grid during overproduc tion period. Tracking energy produc tion and consumption on a rea l time basis a llows us to identify spikes and d ips in consumption and be better prepared to minimize peak demand charges. In order to expand the benefi ts of monitoring, we plan to start monitoring large load use points within the plant to help with load shedding and shifting during peak hours when elec tric ity is the most expensive.

We track elec tric ity consumption by kWh consumed per barrel (BBL) of beer produced. One of the road blocks we face in our energy tracking program is that the entire Sierra Nevada campusrestaurant, CO2 recover, waste water treatment fac ility, etc .are all on the same elec tric ity meter, making it very d iffi cult to break out brewing energy consumption. However, in the last four years we have successfully reduced our overall elec tric ity consumption while inc reasing produc tion.

2.2 Ensuring Accuracy

Calculation of Cost Savings

At 49 kWh/BBL x 22,500 BBLS = 1,102,500 kWh/yr. At average total energy cost of $0.047/kWh the

total cost = $51,817 Potential savings: $61,970 - $51,817 = $10,153 or 17% of energy yearly cost

Energy Total kWh used / Total barrels produced = Intensity Ratio

MJ

per

HL

F08

F07

F06

F05

F04

F03

F02

F01

F00

F99

F98

F97

F96

F95

190

180

170

160

150

140

130

120

Energy Intensity

Using examp les in Sec tion 2.1 the following KPI information can be derived :

The KPI in the example above ranges from 49kWh/ BBL to 72kWh/ BBL. This da ta highlights potentia l savings tha t exist in the b rewerys opera tions.Based on tota l annua l energy cost of $61,970 and an annua l p roduc tion of 22,500 BBLs, the tota l energy cost per barrel is $2.74/ BBL. ($61,970/ 22,500 BBLs = $2.74/ BBL) .

Item Janua ry Feb rua ry March April May June July August Septem-ber

November Dec ember Tota ls

Elec trica l kWh 40,000 45,000 39,000 39,500 50,000 50,000 40,000 35,000 40,000 42,000 30,000 450,500

Fuel kWh 90,000 92,000 80,000 75,000 72,000 73,000 72,000 65,000 67,000 75,000 85,000 846,000

Tota l Enegry kWh 130,000 137,000 119,000 114,500 122,000 123,000 112,000 100,000 107,000 117,000 115,000 1,296,500

Barrels Produced 2,000 2,200 1,800 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,000 1,800 2,000 2,100 1,600 22,500

Example Scenario

Based on d isc ussion with opera tions, ma intenanc e and fi nanc e it was determined tha t fi ve separa te energy reduc tion p rojec ts c an be developed and imp lemented resulting in a 2% overa ll energy reduc tion. Opera tions reported tha t through best p rac tic es, emp loyee tra ining and p roc urement c hanges, an add itiona l 1.5% reduc tion in energy c an be ac hieved . Combining the two c ould result in a 3.5% energy savings overa ll.

Further d iscussion ensues and the team agrees to add 1% to the potentia l saving and establish an overall goal of 4.5% energy reduc tion for the upcoming fi sca l year.

Additional KPIs to trackAREA METRIC METRIC

2.4 Guidelines For Setting Measurable Goals And Objec tives

Examples Of Goal Setting ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOAL PROGRESS TO GOAL

Managing the Energy Reduction Goal

Tracking example

The examp le in Sec tion 2.2 estab lished an average energy intensity ra tio of 58kWh/ BBL using the short-term goa l of 4.5% reduc tion. A new monthly ta rget can be estab lished and used to track progress towards the goa l.

FY2012

Item Ja nua ry Feb rua ry Marc h Ap ril May June July August Sep tem-ber

Novem ber Dec ember Tota ls

Elec tirca l kWh 40,000 45,000 39,000 39,500 50,000 50,000 40,000 35,000 40,000 42,000 30,000 450,500

Fuel kWh 90,000 92,000 80,000 75,000 72,000 73,000 72,000 65,000 67,000 75,000 85,000 846,000

Tota l Energy kWh 130,000 137,000 119,000 114,500 122,000 123,000 112,000 100,000 107,000 117,000 115,000 1,296,500

Barrels Produced 2,000 2,200 1,800 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,000 1,800 2,000 2,100 1,600 22,500

Energy Intensity KPI (kWh/ BBLs

produced)65 62 66 57 49 49 56 56 54 56 72 58

FY2013

Item Ja nua ry Feb rua ry Marc h Ap ril May June July August Sep tem-ber

Novem ber Dec ember Tota ls

Elec tirca l kWh

Fuel kWh

Tota l Energy kWh

Barrels Produced

Energy Intensity KPI (kWh/ BBLs

produced) Ac tua l

Energy Intensity KPI (kWh/ BBLs

produced) Monthly Target

62 59 63 55 47 47 53 53 51 53 69 55

Moderate Cost:

Low Cost:

Maintenanc e

Occ upanc y

Produc tion levels

Wea ther

3.1 Brewing

Best Prac tic es CO2 Rec overy Systems

Major Cost:

Top 10 Energy Best Prac tices; Breweries and Brewpubs/ Restaurants

ITEM TOP 10 BREWERY RELATED ENERGY BEST PRACTICES

Traditional CO2 Collec tion Methods and the Installation of CO2 Stripper/ Reboiler2

Fermenta tionC02 Vapor

Gas washerFoam separator

Foam drain

StripperReboiler(optiona l)

Refrigeration unit

Ac tivated c arbon filter/ driersC02 compressor

C02 to consumersC02 evaporator

C02 condenser

The Standard Method for CO2 Recovery1

3.2 Packaging

Best Prac tic es - Variable Speed Drives

CO2 Cold Energy Conversion3

Operation of a System With and Without VSD

CONTROLVALVE CONTROL VALVE ELIMINATED

OR LOCKED IN OPEN POSITION

POWERINPUT

POWERINPUT

DUTYREQUIRED

DUTYREQUIRED

VSD

VSD4

Data Collec tion and Documentation of Pumping Equipment

Location Motor ID Motor application

Installed power (hp or kW)

Variable torque /

demand (Y/ N)

Annual operating

hours

3.3 Support Systems (Utilities)

Best Prac tic e - Lighting

Daylighting

Elec tric Lamps

Maintenanc e Planning

Best Prac tic e - Compressed Air

Key Lighting Stra teg ies

Cost of Compressed Air Leaks

Compressed Air System Components5

Lea k Dia meter Air loss c fm Energy loss (kWh) Costs (Us$) / YR

inch 85 PSI 85 PSI 85 PSI

1/ 16 2 0.4 320

1/ 8 20 3.7 2,960

1/ 4 55 10.3 8,240

3/ 8 221 41.4 33.120

( * ) kW x $0.1/ kWh x 8,000 annua l opera ting hours

Compressed Air Leak Tracking

Weekly Plant a ir

Line 1 CFM Line 2 CFM Tota l PLt CFM

1500

1000

500

0

Common Leak Locations

1. Br a n ch l i n e con n ect i on

2 . Ru bber h oses

3. Au t om a t i c d r a i n t r a p

4 . Qu i ck cou pl er s

5 . D esi cca n t f i l t er s

6 . I so l a t i n g va l ves

8 . Con t r o l va l ves

10. Coi l h ose

11. Reg u l a t or s

12. Pn eu m a t i c cyl i n d er s

7 . Fi l t er / r eg u l a t or / l u br i ca t or a ssem bl y

9 . Fi l t er / r eg u l a t or / coa l escen t f i l t er a ssem bl y

Com m on Loca t i on s Wh er e Ai r Lea k s Ca n Occu r

Combustion Effi c ienc y

Fuel-To-Steam Effi c ienc y

Therma l Effi c ienc y

Compressed Air Leak Tracking

Line 1 CFM Line 2 CFM Tota l PLt CFM

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Best Prac tic es Boiler Effi c ienc y

Blow-down losses

Condensa te losses

Convec tion and rad ia tion losses

Heat Losses6

Hea t loss in flue gases 18%

Energy in fuel

Rad ia tion and convection hea t loss 4%

Energy input 100% Energy output (boiler thermal effic iency)

75-77%

BoilerEnergy in hea ting

med ium (e.g . steam)

Hea t loss in b lowdown 3%

Stac k gas losses

Exc ess a ir

Boiler Blow-down:

Never use untreated RO water as boiler make up water.

Proper Exc ess Air:

Effi c iency of boiler (n) = 100 - (i + ii + iii + iv + v + vi + vii)

Whereby the princ ip le losses that occur in a boiler are loss of heat due to:i. Dry fl ue gas ii. Evaporation of water formed due to H2 in fueliii. Evaporation of moisture in fueliv. Moisture present in combustion airv. Un-burnt fuel in fl y ashvi. Un-burnt fuel in bottom ashvii. Radiation and other unaccounted losses

NOTE: The following items are intended to assist with improving boiler effi c iency. All fac ilities must be aware of any codes, regulations and insurance requirements that are required in order to safely operate a boiler at a given location.

Sample Boiler Data Collec tion FormBoiler Name/

LocationBoiler Type Age Purpose-

Steam heat or hot water

heat

Date last update (Name)

Boiler Maintenance ChecklistDesc ription Comments Monthly

Maintenance

Reduc e Sc a ling and Soot Losses:

Rad ia tion and Convec tion Heat Loss Minimiza tion:

Reduc tion of Boiler Steam Pressure:

Variab le Speed Control:

Boiler Checklist EvaluationItem #

Boiler Evaluation Checklist

Reviewed Remarks Issues

NOTE: The following items are intended to assist with improving effi c ienc y through boiler maintenanc e steps and depending on the loc ation may not be an inc lusive list. All fac ilities must be aware of any c odes, regula tions and insuranc e requirements that are required in order to safely operate a boiler a t a g iven loc ation.

Boiler Pressure and Temperature LogItem #

Boiler Checkpoints Units Readings (notes)

Date

Steam Princ iple

Steam

Boiler

Feed wa ter

Combustion a ir Exhaust g as (220 - 270C) d ischa rged to a tmosphere

30C - 90C

30C

Boiler Effi c iency Rule of Thumb: A 4C reduc tion in fl ue gas temperature will improve boiler effi c iency by about 1%. The waste heat from the fl ue gas can be used to preheat boiler feed water, preheat boiler makeup water and heat process water/fl uids.

Best Prac tic es - Boiler Heat Rec overy

Boiler Steam Recovery

NOTE: Insta lling an ec onomizer or b low-down heat exc hanger is a projec t that requires external resourc es to design, and insta ll. This work should be performed by qualifi ed engineers, suppliers and insta llers.

Process Flow Steam System7

Best Prac tic e - Condensate Rec overy

Boiler Effi c iency ChecklistItem #

Heat Recovery Checkpoints

Comments Notes

Schematic Overview of A Standard Steam System

Steam System Diagram

Condensate System Audit ChecklistLocation Item Use How can condensate be lost?

Common Areas and Causes that Condensate Can Be Lost In A Steam System

Ensure that the condensate pumps (if used) are properly sized to the correc t net positive suc tion head (NPSH).

Consult with the supplier that provided the equipment or with your boiler maintenance technic ians to determine if your condensate pumps are sized properly and are func tioning in a proper manner.

Failure to size the pump for the proper NPSH will cause the pump to cavita te damaging pump seals and impeller.

Check the pump to verify that the temperature ra ting for the condensate pump is designed to collec t condensate at a tmospheric saturation temperature of 212 F or 100 C if the pump is not sized to handle these temperatures the pump will fa il to operate properly.

%Condensa te Return=((Z + X)-Y)

(X + Z)* 100

%Condensa te Return=((Z + X)-Y)

(X + Z)* 100%

Calculate current condensate return

Calculate the current condensate return by using the formula in the examples below:

3.4 Food Service

Best Prac tic es - Refrigeration

Monitoring Condensate Return

78

76

74

72

70

68

66

64

62

60

58week nr

ta rget = 75%

a ction required !

condensate %

condensa te %

Best Prac tic e Tankless Water Heaters (On-Demand Hot Water)

Best Prac tic es - Cleaning/ Sanitization

Best Prac tic es - Kitc hen Area

Best Prac tic es - Parking Lot/ Outdoor Seating

Best Prac tic es - Dining Room

3.5 Concerts and Events

Energy Effi c iency Evaluation Loop

Id entify Business Justifica tion fo r Renewa b le Energ y

Techno log y / Ap p lica tion Review g enera tion, hea t g enera tion, etc .

4.2 Fuel Availability

4.3 Fuel Supply and Cost

4.1 Technology and Use Application Review

4.5 Cost and Savings Review

4.4 Size Selec tion and Infrastruc ture Impac ts

Renewable Energy Comparison

Tec hnology Fuel Conc erns Energy Savings / OffsetsEnvironmenta l

Impa c tsInc entives,

Reba tes, Gra ntsInfrastruc ture Mod i c a tions Cap ita l Cost

Return on Investment Rec ommend a tion

PV Sola r Sun Level Class 3 100kWh/ day None Tax Cred it Yes, Roof $120,000 4.5 yearsHold , until

economics a re more favorab le

Sola r Heat Sun Level Class 3 50m3/ m Yes, Water Tax Cred it, Utility Reba te

Yes, Roof and Pip ing $45,000 1.5 years

Move forward with Projec t

Development

Bio-gas Cogen 300m3/ month 3600m3/ yr

Yes, waste wa ter permits

Tax Cred it, Sta te Grant

Yes, Insta ll anaerob ic

d igester$150,000 2 years

Move forward with deta iled scope and

estima te

Wind Genera tion Low Wind 20kWh/ m

Yes, impac t study Tax Cred it No $75,000 10 years

Not app licab le to site study

d iscontinued

Geo Therma l NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Not app licab le to site

Renewable Energy Certifi cates8

Renewab le Genera tion Source

Po int o f Use

Elec tric ity Pa thway RECs Pa thway

Onc e your org iniza tion makes a c la im, your REC c annot be sold . Your org iniza tion must retire its

RECs to p revent doub le c la ims in the future

Elec tric ity and RECs c an be and often a re sold

sepera tely 1 REC = 1000 kilowa tts - hours (or 1

megawatt - hour)

Elec tric ity and RECs c an be d istributed over d iverse

geogra phic a l a reas

RECs reduc e net g reenhouse gas emissions

assoc ia ted w ith purc hased e lec tric ity

RECs represent the right to c la ims the a ttributes and benefits of the renewa b le genera tion sourc e

RECs a re tracked through c ontrac t a rrangements or REC trac king systems

Certified and verified p roduc ts ensure tha t only one buyer c an c la im eac h 1000 kilowatt - hours (REC) of renewa b le elec tric genera tion

RECs represent the same a ttributes a t the point of genera tion as they do a t the point of use

Plac ing renewa b le elec tric ity on the g rid has the impac t of reduc ing the need for fossil fuel-based elec tric ity

genera tion to serve c onsumer demand

Elec trons tha t make up c ommodity elec tric ity a re physic a lly the same

and cannot be tracked independently

Sinc e a ll e lec trons a re equa l, it is d iffic ult to know what sourc e

p roduc ed your elec tric ity

RECs help address this c ha llenge

4.6 Renewable Energy Certifi cates

Desc hutes Brewery Bend, Oregon

5.1 Usage and Reduc tion

Boulevard Brewing Company Kansas City, Missouri

Sierra Nevada Brewing Company Chic o, California

Harpoon Brewery Boston, Massac husetts

New Belgium Brewing Company Fort Collins, Colorado

5.2 Onsite Renewable Energy

Luc ky Labrador Brewing Company Portland, Oregon

Standing Stone Brewing Company Ashland, Oregon

New Belgium Brewing Company Fort Collins, Colorado

Sierra Nevada Brewing Company Chic o, California

Standing Stone Brewing Company Ashland, Oregon

Vic tory Brewing Company Downingtown, Pennsylvania

Exc el-Based ToolsGuidanc e and Chec klists

New Belg ium Brewing Company: Brewing With a Consc ienc e

Tec hnic a l Support Doc ument: 50% Energy Savings for Quic k-Servic e Restaurants

Brewing green/ our c ommitment towards a susta inab le future for Brita ins beer

Water, Energy and Clima te Change A c ontribution from the business c ommunity

Brewing Sec tor Initia tives in Environmenta l Susta inab ility

Brewery Ma in Bloc k, Feasib ility Study of Renewab le Energy and Energy Effi c ienc y Options

Energy Effi c ienc y Opportunities in the Canad ian Brewing Industry

Design Guide 1 Improving Commerc ia l Kitc hen Ventila tion System Performanc e

Improving the Effi c ienc y and Effec tiveness of Delivering the Servic e of Hot Water

nergy Effi c ienc y Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Breweries

Energy Sta r Build ing Manua l

Green Sheets

The Green Brewery Projec t

CO2 Rec overy: Improved Performanc e with a Newly Developed System

Grea t Lakes Water Conserva tion Conferenc e for Cra ft Brewers and Cheese makers

ARB Manda tory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Restaurant Energy Use Benchmarking Guideline

Susta inab ility How-to Guide Series- Susta inab ility in the Food Servic e Environment

A new g loba l Energy Management Systems standard - What does ISO 50001 mean for our industry?

Redefi ning Climate Leadership

Energy from Waste Biomass the BtVB proc ess

Desc hutes Brewery

Case Study: Stand ing Stone Brewing Co.

2010 Susta inab ility Report

Reduc ing Emissions- British Beer Pub Assoc ia tion

Energy and Water Use in the Brewing Industry

Brewery Vivant s 2011 Susta inab ility Report

Earth Day a t Boundary Bay: Brewery hosts April 22 susta inab ility fa ir

Energy Trends in Selec ted Manufac turing Sec tors

Environmenta l, Hea lth, and Sa fety Guidelines for Breweries

Foster s Susta inab ility Report Harpoon Brewery Wins Boston Green Business

Award for Susta inab ility and EnerNOC Energy Management Programs

Managing Energy Costs in Mic robreweries