Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(36)67-48-01646B Not eligible24130Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 572 85 487

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 36 Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(9)109-48-03727B Not eligible2510Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 62 85 392

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(9)109-48-03728A Not eligible2520Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 83 85 398

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(9)67-48-04729A Not eligible24150Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23 85 434

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 (SR 67) Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(I69)132-48-04727A Not eligible39095Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11 85 459

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: OLD SR 132 Feature Crossed: I-69

688

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-48-00157A Not eligible2560Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 192 85 403

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-48-04594A Not eligible2550Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 183 85 404

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: STAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

013-48-03806 Not eligible3360Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 151 85 506

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

013-48-04082B Not eligible3300Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 574 85 507

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

013-48-04083A Not eligible3310Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 580 85 506

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: FALL CREEK

689

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-48-04100A Not eligible10700Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 46 85 512

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: STONY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-48-04513C Not eligible10720Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 69 85 376

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

038-48-01301A Not eligible12860Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 590 85 383

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: CROWELL DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

038-48-06021B Not eligible12780Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13 85 510

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: SANDY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

038-48-06206B Not eligible12850Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 594 85 398

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

690

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

236-48-04737A Not eligible29890Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 38 85 356

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 236 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-20-04728B Not eligible39100Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18 85 450

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-23-04731B Not eligible39150Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28 85 416

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: BROWN ST RD/CR100W Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-24-04732B Not eligible39160Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30 85 407

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-26-04735B Not eligible39230Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33 85 381

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 EAST Feature Crossed: I-69

691

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-26-04736A Not eligible39240Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34 85 369

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 300 EAST Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-29-04738A Not eligible39310Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47 85 349

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00041 Not eligible4800034Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.8 085 41.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00042 Not eligible4800035Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.6 085 41.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: RD 100 W Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00047 Not eligible4800040Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.3 085 43.7

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 300 W Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK

692

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible4800044Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.0 085 48.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 900 N Feature Crossed: SWANFELT DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00054 Not eligible4800047Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.4 085 50.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 1000 N Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00058 Not eligible4800051Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.3 085 51.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 1050 N Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible4800052Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.8 085 45.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 400 N Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00060 Not eligible4800053Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.5 085 49.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 1300 N Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

693

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00063 Not eligible4800056Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.0 085 48.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 700 W Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible4800057Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.8 085 47.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: RD 600 W Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00068 Not eligible4800058Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.8 085 50.2

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 400 N Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00078 Not eligible4800068Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.1 085 46.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 200 N Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible4800078Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.0 085 35.4

Simple steel girder - floor beam system

303B

//Feature Carried: RD 425 E Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

694

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible4800085Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.8 085 36.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 500 N Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00098 Not eligible4800087Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.1 085 40.0

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CROSS STREET Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00104 Not eligible4800092Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.9 085 36.7

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: RD 400 N Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00107 Not eligible4800094Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.6 085 38.0

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 200 E Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible4800096Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.6 085 34.8

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 450 E Feature Crossed: BRANDON DITCH

695

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00115 Not eligible4800100Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.2 085 35.7

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 400 E Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00121 Not eligible4800105Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.2 085 47.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 800 S Feature Crossed: FOSTER BRANCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible4800112Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.9 085 48.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 750 W Feature Crossed: FALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00140 Not eligible4800120Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.1 085 46.2

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 1050 S Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00141 Not eligible4800121Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.1 085 44.1

Timber slab701

//Feature Carried: RD 1050 S Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

696

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00142 Not eligible4800122Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.3 085 43.8

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 300 W Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00147 Not eligible4800127Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.0 085 41.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: FALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00152 Not eligible4800201Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.4 085 39.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: NEW COLUMBUS AVE Feature Crossed: SUGAR RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00153 Not eligible4800202Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.9 085 39.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: NEW COLUMBUS AVE Feature Crossed: SUGAR RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00154 Not eligible4800203Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.0 085 39.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: NEW COLUMBUS AVE Feature Crossed: SUGAR RUN

697

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00155 Not eligible4800131Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.7 085 39.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 100 E Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00159 Not eligible4800134Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.7 085 34.6

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 1100 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00172 Not eligible4800147Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.7 085 36.9

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 300 E Feature Crossed: FALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00188 Not eligible4800182Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.7 085 46.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: OLD STATE ROAD 132 Feature Crossed: FOSTER BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00238 Not eligible4800154Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.6 085 49.4

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 800 W Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

698

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00243 Not eligible4800156Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.6 085 34.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: RD 200 S Feature Crossed: BRANDON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00505 Not eligible4800161Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/4/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.0 085 40.7

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: GRAND AVENUE Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00601 Not eligible4800163Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.9 085 49.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SOUTH M STREET Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00602 Not eligible4800164Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.9 085 49.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SOUTH N STREET Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00607 Not eligible4800169Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16.5 085 50.8

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SOUTH A STREET Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

699

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00609 Not eligible4800171Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.0 085 50.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: NORTH F STREET Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00610 Not eligible4800172Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16.8 085 50.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: NORTH C STREET Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00611 Not eligible4800173Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.0 085 50.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 19TH STREET Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00612 Not eligible4800174Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.0 085 50.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 16TH STREET Feature Crossed: BIG DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00701 Not eligible4800176Madison NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.4 085 40.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 3RD STREET Feature Crossed: ALEXANDRIA CREEK

700

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

031-49-03357A Not eligible9430Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 409 86 90

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

031-49-04448A Not eligible9440Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 420 86 90

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: I-465 & LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

036-49-03970C Not eligible11700Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 459 86 161

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 36 Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-49-05024BNBL Not eligible12430Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 384 86 122

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 NBL Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-49-05025BNBL Not eligible12450Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 400 86 118

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 NBL Feature Crossed: LITTLE BUCK CREEK

701

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

040-49-03058 Not eligible13940Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 465 85 591

Cont reinforced concrete box girder - multiple

205

//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

040-49-03433A Not eligible13830Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 439 86 194

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: LITTLE WHITE LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-49-04148A Not eligible19190Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 444 85 585

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-49-04326 Not eligible19210Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 442 85 577

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-49-04386A Not eligible19200Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 443 85 581

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

702

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

136-49-04577A Not eligible26960Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 483 86 172

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

421X)421-49-04463B Not eligible32515Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 556 86 138

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HUNTER ROAD Feature Crossed: US 421X

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

465)I65-123-04568B Not eligible50710Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 519 86 164

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: OLD US 52 Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465)431-49-04445B Not eligible32565Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 420 86 84

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: MADISON AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465 & LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-108-04403A Not eligible49710Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 423 86 62

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SHERMAN DRIVE Feature Crossed: I-465

703

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-110-04400B Not eligible49750Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 425 86 39

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: ARLINGTON AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-115-05048A Not eligible49860Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 457 86 18

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: ENGLISH AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-147-04564A Not eligible50740Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 503 86 166

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: WEST 46TH STREET Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-148-04562A Not eligible50760Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 490 86 166

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: WEST 34TH STREET Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-148-04563BWBL

Not eligible50750Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 494 86 166

Continuous steel beam402A

//

Feature Carried: W 38TH STREET WB Feature Crossed: I-465

704

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-150-04460A Not eligible50850Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 468 86 163

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: WEST 10TH STREET Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-154-04649C Not eligible50960Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 438 86 159

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: AIR. EXPRESSWAY EB Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-154-04649JB Not eligible50950Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 438 86 159

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: AIR. EXPRESSWAY WB Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-155-04646B Not eligible50970Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 424 86 159

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: WEST HANNA AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-157-04721B Not eligible51000Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 419 86 154

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: MOORESVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-465

705

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-158-04459B Not eligible51010Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 416 86 146

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: MANN ROAD Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-164-04798A Not eligible51210Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 421 86 73

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: KEYSTONE AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I465-165-04442B Not eligible51220Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 422 86 68

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: CARSON AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-465 & LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-108-04446A Not eligible36100Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 426 86 66

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HANNA AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-119-04839B Not eligible36870Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 495 86 127

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: KESSLER BOULEVARD Feature Crossed: I-65 & 38TH STREET

706

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-121-04843C Not eligible36970Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 508 86 156

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: WEST 52ND STREET Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-125-04288A Not eligible37090Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 535 86 183

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: TRADERS LANE Feature Crossed: I-65 & CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-71-04438A Not eligible44520Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 491 86 181

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: DANDY TRAIL Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-94-04633B Not eligible44570Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 440 86 22

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: FISHER ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

I74-96-04209A Not eligible44590Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 430 86 5

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: POST ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

707

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-97-04208A Not eligible44600Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 426 86 2

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: VANDERGRIFF ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-98-04206B Not eligible44620Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 418 85 595

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: THOMPSON ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

P000-49-08735 Not eligible60014Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 481 86 174

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SERVICE ROAD Feature Crossed: MARIO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

P000-49-08736 Not eligible60015Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 481 86 174

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SERVICE ROAD Feature Crossed: MARIO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0101F Not eligible4900001Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.0 086 17.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: MOORE ROAD Feature Crossed: SHEETS CREEK

708

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0102F Not eligible4900002Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.3 086 18.0

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: LAFAYETTE ROAD Feature Crossed: EAGLE CREEK RESERVOIR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0103F Not eligible4900003Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.9 086 18.1

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: LAFAYETTE ROAD Feature Crossed: TRADER'S HOLLOW

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0104F Not eligible4900004Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.6 086 17.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 86TH STREET Feature Crossed: EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0105F Not eligible4900005Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.6 086 18.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 86TH STREET Feature Crossed: FISHBACK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0302F Not eligible4900011Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.8 086 12.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 79TH STREET Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

709

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

0304F Not eligible4900013Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.0 086 13.0

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: MICHIGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: PAYNE BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0307F Not eligible4900015Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.7 086 10.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 86TH STREET Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0308F Not eligible4900016Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.9 086 11.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 79TH / DITCH Feature Crossed: HOWARD JOHNSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0401F Not eligible4900022Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.6 086 08.7

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: COLLEGE AVENUE Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0403L Not eligible4900024Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.9 086 09.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: PENNSYLVANIA ST Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

710

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0405F Not eligible4900025Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.0 086 09.9

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SPRINGMILL ROAD Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0407F Not eligible4900493Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.7 086 06.9

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: KEYSTONE AVENUE SB Feature Crossed: 86TH STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0408F Not eligible4900492Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.7 086 06.8

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: KEYSTONE AVENUE NB Feature Crossed: 86TH STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0411F Not eligible4900636Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.9 086 09.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: MERIDIAN STREET Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0502F Not eligible4900028Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.5 086 05.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: DEAN ROAD Feature Crossed: HOWLAND DITCH

711

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0503F Not eligible4900029Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.4 086 05.2

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: ALLISONVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: HOWLAND DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0504L Not eligible4900030Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.9 086 04.0

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 79TH STREET Feature Crossed: WADSWORTH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0702L Not eligible4900034Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.8 086 00.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 86TH STREET Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0703L Not eligible4900035Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.1 085 57.8

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: FOX ROAD Feature Crossed: DRY BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0804L Not eligible4900040Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.0 086 16.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: LAKESIDE DRIVE Feature Crossed: BUSHES RUN

712

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0903F Not eligible4900043Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.0 086 14.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 62ND STREET Feature Crossed: LITTLE EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0904F Not eligible4900044Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.2 086 14.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 56TH STREET Feature Crossed: GUION CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

0905F Not eligible4900045Marion NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.2 086 15.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 56TH STREET Feature Crossed: LITTLE EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical eve