Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation Everyone Sees...
24
Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation Everyone Sees Everything By David Marghania CSPA Skopje, May, 2013
-
Upload
ferdinand-baker -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation Everyone Sees...
Second year’s results of Ge-GP operation
Everyone Sees Everything
By David Marghania CSPA
Skopje, May, 2013
Georgian Electronic Government Procurement System - Ge-GP
100% e-tenders - since December 1, 2010
Developed in-house…in one year
$2.0 billion went through Ge-GP
$230 million public funds savings
More than 17 000 registered users
Some features of Ge-GP
• No local preference/ No local presence/ ~200 foreign bidders/ contracts won > 50 Non discrimination
• Deadlines / Thresholds / Homogeneity / Abnormally low price / Documents
Smart system preventing mistakes /
warning• Topics of interest / News / Updates / Legal and procedural
amendments / more than 5 million messages sent Internal messaging system
• E-submission of complaint/ Free of charge / Standstill Period/ Very fast -10 days / Civil society equally involved in decision making
Fast and transparent dispute resolution
• No administrative documents in advance / No physical visits / Electronic bid bondsMinimum
administrative barriers
Everyone sees everything
Annual Procurement
PlanTender Notice Tender
Documentation
Tender Proposal/Bids
Minutes of evaluation Committee
All related documents and
correspondence
All data on disputes, including
application and decision
Contracts and amendments
Payments under the contracts
Distribution of the estimated value of electronic tenders
The majority of announced tenders is of relatively small value and particularly attractive for SMEs. in 48% cases, the estimated value of the announced tenders does not exceed GEL 10,000, and in 81% the estimated value is less than GEL 50,000
Quantitative statistics of tenders announced during a year
In 2012 the largest number of tenders was announced in January, while in 2011 - in March. The least active period was the fall season both in 2011 and 2012
Number of awarded contracts according to procurement objects
Net value indexes according to procurement objects
Top 10 procurement categories according to savings
Calculated according to sectors, proportional to estimated value of e-tenders, approximately 36% of saved amounts account for e-tenders held for the purpose of procurement of construction works.
N CPV_NAME Est. Value Contract Price Savings %
1
45200000 Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work 617,661,689 559,802,752 57,858,937 9
2 45400000 Building completion work 109,944,385 93,537,813 16,406,572 153 77300000 Horticultural services 22,499,500 16,569,450 5,930,050 264 66500000 Insurance and pension services 25,892,151 21,244,070 4,648,081 185 30200000 Computer equipment and supplies 30,093,330 25,969,581 4,123,749 146 33600000 Pharmaceutical products 23,497,910 19,629,245 3,868,665 16
7
30100000 Office machinery , equipment and supplies except computers , printers and furniture 17,183,414 13,479,732 3,703,682 22
8 33100000 Medical equipments 21,650,039 18,509,210 3,140,829 159 71300000 Engineering services 14,995,600 11,876,304 3,119,296 2110 45300000 Building installation work 22,539,505 19,804,631 2,734,874 12
Total 905,957,523 800,422,789 105,534,734 12
Top 10 procurement categories according to average participation
Diagram Below depicts top 10 CPV categories according to average number of tender participants. Compared with 2011, the intensity of participation particularly increased in service fields (e.g. insurance and pension services, services related to planting of greenery, cleaning and sanitation).
N CPV code Number of tenders
Number of suppliers
Aver. Number of suppliers
Savings%
1 90900000 Cleaning and sanitation services 219 555 2.53 2,434,292 192 45400000 Building completion work 1,379 3,295 2.40 16,464,799 153 39800000 Cleaning and polishing products 82 197 2.40 239,157 224 14800000 Miscellaneous non-metallic mineral products 5 12 2.40 12,923 30
5
22800000 Paper or paperboard registers, account books, binders, forms and other articles of printed stationery
159 380 2.39 505,125 30
6 09200000 Petroleum, coal and oil products 70 166 2.37 404,205 247 48700000 Software package utilities 28 64 2.29 112,026 208 44300000 Cable, wire and related products 34 77 2.26 114,102 209 37500000 Games and toys; fairground amusements 29 65 2.24 749,083 2010 33700000 Personal care products 91 202 2.22 541,210 22
Total 2,096 5,013 2.35 21,576,922 16
Distribution of accomplished state procurementaccording to procurement methods
The registration of the suppliers increases at the beginning and the end of a year, when the number of the announced electronic tenders is also high.
Compared with 2011, the rate of increase of the number of sole entrepreneurs and natural persons registered in the Ge-GP was higher than the similar index of limited liability companies, resulting in the decrease of the LLCs from 66% to 62%
The number of the LLCs in the Ge-GP increased by 42% - from 4,839 to 6,893
The number of individual entrepreneurs registered in the Ge-GP increased by 52% - from 1,830 to 2,800, showing the increased interest of SMEs in state procurement
Approximately 80% of contracts are awarded to LLCs
Correlation between the LLCs and suppliers of other legal forms in
the Ge-GP by the end of 2012
Correlation between the LLCs and suppliers of other legal forms in the Ge-GP by the end of 2012
Dispute resolution board
Dispute Resolution Board was created on 10th of December, 2010
Equal representation of public and state representatives in decision making
Everyone can “freeze” a tender with just a single click of a button. Submission of appeal takes less than two minutes
An appealed tender will be “frozen” for a period of 10 business days. During this period the eDRB will review the appeal and the results will be published in the Ge-GP
Number of appeals filed with the eDRB
Statuses of appeals, filed with the eDRB
User demographics overview by locations
Country/Territory Visits Pages/Visits Avg. Visit Duration % New Visits1 Georgia 1,766,092 2.85 0:05:27 10.11%2 Turkey 2,728 2.87 0:03:48 47.03%3 Ukraine 2,103 3.5 0:04:05 27.39%4 United States 1,878 2.02 0:02:47 39.24%5 Russia 1,268 3.85 0:03:07 54.81%6 Germany 1,262 2.57 0:03:15 38.35%7 Armenia 888 2.94 0:04:04 32.66%8 India 806 2.82 0:03:51 61.79%9 United Arab Emirates 799 5.41 0:07:30 9.14%
10 United Kingdom 525 2.38 0:02:52 43.81%11 China 501 3.34 0:05:20 32.34%12 France 486 2.51 0:29:14 25.31%13 Switzerland 449 1.91 0:02:12 36.53%14 Spain 449 2.51 0:03:14 25.61%15 Italy 429 2.29 0:03:10 51.52%
Visitors Overview
OUR EVALUATION
December 2012
Georgia moved from 68th to 51st place in 2012 TI CPI thanks to the Ge-GP
November 2012
Georgia was highly appraised amongst the Eastern Partnership Countries in the field of state procurement
May 2012
The UN recognized the Ge-GP as one of the best worldwide
Challenges
Lack of competencies of all involved partiesNon-active CSOs – not using all features of Ge-GPAbsence of standardized description of goods and services, checklists, toolkits, etc. Integrity issues – contract management module is being developed and will be launched in June 2013.
