SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

15
Water Quality Chemistry : Generation of Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) disinfectant by electrolysis of NaCl Solution SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

description

Water Quality Chemistry : Generation of Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) disinfectant by electrolysis of NaCl Solution. SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012). Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). NaOCl is produced either when: Chlorine gas is dissolved in sodium hydroxide solution, or - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Page 1: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Water Quality Chemistry: Generation of Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) disinfectant by electrolysis of NaCl Solution

SEAVURIASeattle + Kenya (2012)

Page 2: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)

• NaOCl is produced either when:– Chlorine gas is dissolved in sodium hydroxide

solution, or– A sodium chloride solution (brine) is treated with

electricity (electrolysis)• NaOCl solutions are called liquid bleach or

Javelle water• Onsite generation of NaOCl needed due to

decomposition over time(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 3: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Image courtesy of Boal ( 2009)

Anode: + electrodeWhere the oxidation of chloride ions (Cl-), involving the lose of 1 electron (e-) per Cl-, results in the production of chlorine gas (Cl2).

Cathode: - electrodeWhere the reduction of water (H20), involving the gain of 2e-, results in the production of hydrogen gas (H2) and hydroxide ions (OH-).

Electrolysis: Production of NaOCl

Page 4: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

NaCl + H20 → NaOCl + H2Sodium chloride

(table salt)

Water Sodium hypochlorite

Hydrogen gas

Oxidant

Oxidized Reduced

NaOCl + H20 → HOCl + Na+ + OH-

Electrolysis:

Water Treatment:

(Boal, 2009)

Hypochlorous acid (Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 5: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Typical Chlorine Dosages

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 6: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Chlorine: Pathogen Inactivation • In bacteria, chlorine found to adversely affect

cell respiration, transport and DNA activity.– Decreases oxygen utilization – Damages cell wall membrane– Decreases levels of DNA synthesis

(Disinfectant, 1999)

(Haas and Engelbrecht, 1980)

Page 7: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Chlorine: Environmental Effects

• Several environmental factors influence the inactivation efficiency of chlorine, including:– Temperature and pH,– Contact time and mixing,– Turbidity and interfering substances, and– Concentration of available chlorine

• Temperature and pH have the most impact on pathogen inactivation by chlorine.

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 8: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Chlorine: Effect of Temperature and pH

• Temperature:– Pathogen inactivation increases with temperature.– If temperature is lowered by 10C, contact time should be

increased 2-3X (Clarke et. Al, 1962)

• pH:– Most impact on pathogen inactivation by chlorine– Germicidal efficiency of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) much higher

than that of hypochlorite ion (OCl-)– Note: addition of OCl- to water increases pH– HOCl dominates at low pH = ↑ disinfection– At less effective pH contact time should be increased (Culp and Culp,

1974; Scarpino et al., 1972)

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 9: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Chlorine: Disinfection Efficacy• Bacteria Inactivation: Chlorine extremely effective as disinfectant for

inactivating bacteria– HOCl is 70-80X more effective than OCl- (Culp/Wesner/Culp, 1986)– If temperature is lowered by 10C, contact time should be increased 2-3X (Clarke et. Al, 1962)

• Virus Inactivation: Chlorine is highly effective viricide– In 1971 study (0.5 mg/L free chlorine; pH 7.8; 2⁰C):

• Reovirus (least resistant): 2.7 min. contact time for 99.99% inactivation (4 log removal)• Poliovirus (most resistant): 60 minute contact time for 99.99% inactivation• 99.99% inactivation for all 20 viruses studied was between 1.4 to >30 mg•min/L (CT values)

• Protozoa Inactivation: Chlorine has limited success inactivating protozoa, like Giardia (Hoff et al., 1984); see Figures 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3 for more details– Resistance of Giardia two orders of magnitude higher than some viruses– Resistance of Giardia >three orders of magnitude higher than some bacteria– Chlorine has little impact on viability of Cryptosporidium when used at the relatively low

doses encountered in water treatment (e.g., 5 mg/L)

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 10: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Figure 2-1. Free Chlorine Giardia and Virus CT Requirements

Shows that the CT values (mg•min/L) required to achieve recommended disinfection efficiency for conventional filtration systems (i.e., 0.5-log Giardia cyst and 2-log virus inactivation level) are 23 and 3 mg•min/L, respectively. (Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 11: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

According to figure, does the inactivation efficacy of free chlorine increase or decrease with increased pH?

Figure 2-2. CT Values for Inactivation of Giardia Cysts by Free Chlorine a 10⁰C (at Cl2 dose of 3.0 mg/L)

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 12: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

According to figure, does the inactivation efficacy of free chlorine increase or decrease with increased temperature?

Figure 2-3. CT Values for Inactivation of Giardia Cysts by Free Chlorine at pH 7.0 ( at Cl2 dose of 3.0 mg/L)

(Disinfectant, 1999)

Page 13: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Proposed Experiments

• Test the effect of pH on chlorine bacterial inactivation

• Test the effect of temperature on chlorine bacterial inactivation

• Test the effect of contact time on chlorine bacterial inactivation

• Test the effectiveness of coffee filters on removing yeast from solution before plating

Page 14: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

Additional Information (Disinfectant, 1999)

• 2.7.6 Operational Considerations– 2.7.6.1 Application Methods (p. 2-41)– 2.7.6.2 Safety and Handling Considerations (p. 2-

42)• 2.8 Summary– 2.8.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Chlorine

Use (p. 2-42 & 2-43)– 2.8.2 Summary Table (Table 2-22, p. 2-44)

Page 15: SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)

References• Boal, Andrew K. "On-Site Generation of Disinfectants." National Environmental

Services Center. Spring 2009. Web. 19 Mar. 2012. <http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/pdf/dw/publications/ontap/2009_tb/onsite_generation_DWFSOM133.pdf>.

• Clark, N.A., et al. 1962. Human Enteric Viruses in Water, Source, Survival, and Removability, Internal Conference on Water Pollution Research. Landar.

• Culp, G.L., and R.L. Culp. 1974. New Concepts in Water Purification. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.

• Culp/Wesner/Culp. 1986. Handbook of Public Water Systems. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.

• "Disinfectant Use in Water Treatment: Chlorine." EPA Guidance Manual. 1999. Web. 19 Mar. 2012. <http://zenbackpacking.net/EPA/Chlorine.pdf>.

• Haas C.N. and R.S. Engelbrecht. 1980. “Physiological Alterations of Vegetative Microorganisms Resulting from Aqueous Chlorination.” J. Water Pollution Control Fed. 52(7): 1976.

• Hoff, J.C., E.W. Rice, ad F.W. Schaefer. 1984. “Disinfection and the Control of Waterborne Giardiasis.” Conference proceedings, ASCE Specialty Conference.

• Scarpino P.V., et al. 1972. “A Comparative Study of the Inactivation of Viruses in Water by Chlorine.” Water Research. 6:959.