Sea Rotmann “Helping the Behaviour Changers – or how to create systemic change. “
-
Upload
energy-cultures-2-janet-stephenson -
Category
Environment
-
view
57 -
download
0
Transcript of Sea Rotmann “Helping the Behaviour Changers – or how to create systemic change. “
IEA DSM Task 24:Behaviour Change in DSM
Phases I and II
Dr Sea RotmannOperating Agent Task 24
Energy Cultures conference, WellingtonJuly 7, 2016
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
What is Task 24?
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
What is Task 24?
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
What is Task 24?
Task 24 – Objective in a tweet (or two)
The overarching impact of this Task is to provide a helicopter overview of best practice approaches to behaviour change interventions and practical, tailored guidelines and tools of how to best design, implement, evaluate and disseminate them in real life.
IEA DSM Task 24Phase I
Closing the Loop – Behaviour Change in DSM: From Theory to Practice
Some numbers of Task 24 – Phase I
• July 2012 – April 2015• 8 participating countries• 9 in-kind countries• >235 behaviour change and DSM experts from 21
countries• 20 successful expert workshops• >145 videos and presentations• Over 45 publications – reports, papers, articles…• Almost 60 case studies from 16 countries in a Wiki• www.ieadsm.org/task/task-24-phase-1/
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Subtasks of Task 24
5 – Social network and expert platform
1 – Helicopter
view of models,
frameworks, contexts
and evaluation
metrics
2 – In-depth
case study analysis
3 –Evaluation
Tool for different
stakeholders
4 – Country-specific
to do’s and not to do’s, guidelines
and recommend
ations
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Government
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Government
Industry
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Government
Industry
Researchers
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Government
Industry
Researchers
The Third Sector
Our audience: Behaviour Changers
Government
Industry
Researchers
The Third Sector
Intermediaries
The Story of Task 24
http://vimeo.com/54915316
Subtask 1 - Definitions of Task 24
http://www.slideshare.net/drsea/definitions-for-task-24
What is behaviour (in Task 24)?
Energy behaviour refers to all human actions that affect the way that fuels (electricity, gas, petroleum, coal, etc) are used to achieve desired services, including the acquisition or disposal of energy-related technologies and materials, the ways in which these are used, and the mental processes that relate to these actions.
Behaviour Change in the context of this Task thus refers to any changes in said human actions which were directly or indirectly influenced by a variety of interventions (e.g. legislation, regulation, incentives, subsidies, information campaigns, peer pressure etc.) aimed at fulfilling specific behaviour change outcomes. These outcomes can include any changes in energy efficiency, total energy consumption, energy technology uptake or demand management but should be identified and specified by the Behaviour Changer designing the intervention for the purpose of outcome evaluation.
What is behaviour (in Task 24)?
Energy behaviour refers to all human actions that affect the way that fuels (electricity, gas, petroleum, coal, etc) are used to achieve desired services, including the acquisition or disposal of energy-related technologies and materials, the ways in which these are used, and the mental processes that relate to these actions.
Behaviour Change in the context of this Task thus refers to any changes in said human actions which were directly or indirectly influenced by a variety of interventions (e.g. legislation, regulation, incentives, subsidies, information campaigns, peer pressure etc.) aimed at fulfilling specific behaviour change outcomes. These outcomes can include any changes in energy efficiency, total energy consumption, energy technology uptake or demand management but should be identified and specified by the Behaviour Changer designing the intervention for the purpose of outcome evaluation.
BEHAVIOUR IS EVERYTHING!
Subtask 1 – The ‘Monster’ and its Wiki
Subtask 1 –Looking at different models of understanding behaviour
Subtask 1 –Looking at different models of understanding behaviour
Language can be a problem!
Language can be a problem!
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
That was our Eureka! moment
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
What is storytelling?
‘Storytelling’ is the construction of a desirable future based on a narrative of past events, with a plot that expresses
some causal relationship To read more: Rotmann et al (2015). Once Upon a
Time… How to tell an energy efficiency story that ‘sticks’. ECEEE Summer study proceedings
And ERSS Special Edition on Storytelling & Narratives
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Stories are:
• Universal• Help us process information• Providing multiple perspectives• Subjective, not one truth• Aid recall• Shape identity• Make connections
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
The art and scientific methodology of storytelling
Narratives = social science tool aimed at providing way to explore how big events (policies) impact on small scale (individuals)
Allow for quick, practical and useful understanding of complexity of interconnected factors in behaviour research
We all turn everything into a narrative in order to remember it
We’re all expert story tellers
Understanding country contexts in form of stories
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Different energy efficiency stories
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Different energy efficiency stories
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Different energy efficiency stories
So… what’s the moral of the story of Task 24?
• There is no silver bullet anywhere but the potential remains huge• Homo economicus doesn’t exist (in energy humans)• Habits are the most difficult thing to break, though it’s easiest
during moments of change• There is no such thing as individual energy use• We need to look at whole-system, societal change• This can’t be done in isolation by one sector - collaboration is key• Everyone has a piece of the puzzle but we can’t see the whole
picture yet• We need a shared learning and collaboration platform that works• We also need a shared language based on narratives
è It’s all about the people!
IEA DSM Task 24 Phase II
Helping the Behaviour Changers
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
The Subtasks of Phase II
5 – Expert Platform (upgraded)
6 –Understanding
Behaviour Changer
Practices in Top DSM
Areas
‘The Issues’
7 –Identifying Behaviour
Changers in these areas
‘The People’
8 –Developing a
toolbox of interventions
to help Behaviour Changers
‘The Tools’
9 –Standardising
Evaluation beyond kWh
‘The Measures’
10 – Telling an Overarching Story ‘The Story”
Task 24 – Phase IIHow it all fits together
What?Subtask 6
‘The Issues’
Who?Subtask 7
‘The People’
How?Subtask 8‘The Tools’
Why?Subtask 9
‘The Measure’
So what?Subtask 10‘The Story’
Subtask 1
Subtask 2
Subtask 4 Subtask 5
Subtask 1
Subtask 4 Subtask 3
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Task 24 Phase IIThe Energy System
How does it look like now?
The way we currently look at the Energy System
Page 5
We pose that a better understanding of the human aspect of energy use, including behavioural and societal drivers and barriers and external and internal contexts, will greatly improve the uptake of energy efficiency and DSM policies and programmes. This is not at all to say that technology, market and business models and energy supply are not hugely important aspects of the Energy System. Instead, we pose that the Energy System begins and ends with the human need for the services derived from energy (warmth, comfort, entertainment, mobility, hygiene, safety etc) and that behavioural interventions using technology, market and business models and changes to supply and delivery of energy are the all-important means to that end. Below we will elaborate on a different ‘model of understanding’ (based on work from Task 24 to date) of the energy system and its actors that offers a pragmatic approach for how we propose to further improve the co-creation of knowledge, learning, sharing and translation into practice among practitioners in the energy field. The way the Energy System is currently established (see Figure 1), does not easily permit such a whole-system view which puts human needs, behaviours and (ir)rationalities at the center of interventions geared at system change. Instead, if we look at the Energy System through the human lens (Figure 2), we can see that it isn’t necessarily this top-down/left-right linear realtionship starting with supply and ending with the end user, but rather a circular relationship which actually starts with the end user need for an energy service (click here for a short video presentation explaining this in more detail).
Figure 1. Current, linear way of looking at the energy system (starting with supply)
eetd.lbl.gov
TOP
DOWN
SUPPLY ! TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION ! TECHNOLOGY ! USER
Another way we could look at the Energy System
Another way we could look at the Energy System
Task 24 view of the Energy System
We pose that the Energy System begins and ends with the human need for the services derived from energy (warmth, comfort, entertainment, mobility, hygiene, safety etc) and that behavioural interventions using technology, market and business models and changes to supply and delivery of energy are the all-important means to that end.
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Task 24 Phase IIThe Collective Impact Approach
Methodoloy of the Behaviour Changer
Framework
A model for collaboration
Collective impact = the commitment of a group of important actors from different sectors to a common agenda for solving a specific social problem.
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Task 24 Phase IISubtask 6 – Understanding the Behaviour Changers’ Practices and Priorities “The Issues”
Deciding on the issues to focus on for Canada
What are the Top DSM Issues here?
Top DSM Issues: • Is there a national list of DSM issues?• What are the biggest behavioural potentials?• What DSM policies and programmes are already tackling these issues and how?• What are their approximate contribution to the country’s load management (economic, technical,
political and societal potentials)?• What are the risks and multiple benefits of each?
What are the potentials, risks and (multiple) benefits for the Top DSM Issues?
Technical potential
Economic Potential
Social Potential
Political (actual)
potential
What are the potentials, risks and (multiple) benefits for the Top DSM Issues?
Technical potential
Economic Potential
Social Potential
Political (actual)
potential
RISKS?
RISKS?
RISKS?
RISKS?
Multiple Benefits?
What are the potentials, risks and (multiple) benefits for the Top DSM Issues?
Technical potential
Economic Potential
Social Potential
Political (actual)
potential
RISKS?
RISKS?
RISKS?
RISKS?
Multiple Benefits?
Multiple Benefits?
Who is the End User whose behaviour we are trying to change?
Page 5
We pose that a better understanding of the human aspect of energy use, including behavioural and societal drivers and barriers and external and internal contexts, will greatly improve the uptake of energy efficiency and DSM policies and programmes. This is not at all to say that technology, market and business models and energy supply are not hugely important aspects of the Energy System. Instead, we pose that the Energy System begins and ends with the human need for the services derived from energy (warmth, comfort, entertainment, mobility, hygiene, safety etc) and that behavioural interventions using technology, market and business models and changes to supply and delivery of energy are the all-important means to that end. Below we will elaborate on a different ‘model of understanding’ (based on work from Task 24 to date) of the energy system and its actors that offers a pragmatic approach for how we propose to further improve the co-creation of knowledge, learning, sharing and translation into practice among practitioners in the energy field. The way the Energy System is currently established (see Figure 1), does not easily permit such a whole-system view which puts human needs, behaviours and (ir)rationalities at the center of interventions geared at system change. Instead, if we look at the Energy System through the human lens (Figure 2), we can see that it isn’t necessarily this top-down/left-right linear realtionship starting with supply and ending with the end user, but rather a circular relationship which actually starts with the end user need for an energy service (click here for a short video presentation explaining this in more detail).
Figure 1. Current, linear way of looking at the energy system (starting with supply)
eetd.lbl.gov
TOP
DOWN
SUPPLY ! TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION ! TECHNOLOGY ! USER
Who is the End User whose behaviour we are trying to change?
Tenants? In single homes or apartment buildings?Home owners? (single or apartment)Office workers in a large commercial building?Retail workers in smaller retail buildings?Landlords? Private or large-scale? Social housing? Commercial?Building Management Operators? Office or e.g. hospitals?Smart meter/feedback/EE technology installers or developers?Drivers? Truck or private vehicle? Behaviour or Mode Switching?Freight companies? Behaviour or technology switching?SMEs? Which sector? CEOs or energy managers/CFOs?Who else could it be?
Page 5
We pose that a better understanding of the human aspect of energy use, including behavioural and societal drivers and barriers and external and internal contexts, will greatly improve the uptake of energy efficiency and DSM policies and programmes. This is not at all to say that technology, market and business models and energy supply are not hugely important aspects of the Energy System. Instead, we pose that the Energy System begins and ends with the human need for the services derived from energy (warmth, comfort, entertainment, mobility, hygiene, safety etc) and that behavioural interventions using technology, market and business models and changes to supply and delivery of energy are the all-important means to that end. Below we will elaborate on a different ‘model of understanding’ (based on work from Task 24 to date) of the energy system and its actors that offers a pragmatic approach for how we propose to further improve the co-creation of knowledge, learning, sharing and translation into practice among practitioners in the energy field. The way the Energy System is currently established (see Figure 1), does not easily permit such a whole-system view which puts human needs, behaviours and (ir)rationalities at the center of interventions geared at system change. Instead, if we look at the Energy System through the human lens (Figure 2), we can see that it isn’t necessarily this top-down/left-right linear realtionship starting with supply and ending with the end user, but rather a circular relationship which actually starts with the end user need for an energy service (click here for a short video presentation explaining this in more detail).
Figure 1. Current, linear way of looking at the energy system (starting with supply)
eetd.lbl.gov
TOP
DOWN
SUPPLY ! TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION ! TECHNOLOGY ! USER
What behaviour are we actually trying to change?
What behaviour are we actually trying to change?
Home owners: Share PV with your neighbourhood (NZ)Commercial building tenants and landlords: co-develop green leases that work (SE)Restaurant owners/SMEs: close doors, turn off burners, lights etc (Fort Collins)Building Management Operators in Hospitals: how to better document and communicate EE (CA)Energy companies: Go all the way with energy efficiency regulations, not just the easy route (AT)ICT in Universities: What are the low-hanging fruit? How can we deliver big savings easily? (NL)Residential retrofits: Training Middle Actors in communities (IE)
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Task 24 Phase IISubtask 7 - The Behaviour Changer Framework “The People”
A new way of visualising the energy system
Who are the RIGHT Behaviour Changers to collaborate on our issue/behaviour?
Government – which level, agency, person/s?
Industry – which sector, organisation, person/s?
Researchers – which discipline, University, person/s?
The Third Sector – which sector, association, person/s?
Intermediaries – which sector, company, person/s?
Understanding the Behaviour Changers’ unique stories
Understanding the Behaviour Changers’ unique stories
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
The Story of Task 24 – continued…
If there is ONE THING to take home from this:
If there is ONE THING to take home from this:
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE PEOPLE!
For more information, visit www.ieadsm.org
Thank you very much for your attention!
Any comments or questions?