Scope Spring 13
-
Upload
michael-malone -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Scope Spring 13
THE SKIDMORE COLLEGE MAGAZINE SPRING 2013Scope
ALSO: LOCAL HISTORY PROJECT • GREEN CLEANING TIPS • LOG-ROLLING CONTEST
working to widen opportunity for
more students with financial need
ACCESS:
CONTENTS
FEATURES:
11 OILING THE HINGESCover story: Can Skidmore financial aid keep opening the doors for more and more students?
ON THE COVER: Get an inside view of financial aid’s facts and figures—see page 11.(Illustration by Jon Reinfurt)
worlds of food
admission and aid
Bountyous research4
18
11
18 YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT?Roundtable: Faculty and alumni experts talk food, from cultural identity to ecology to nutrition
DEPARTMENTS
LETTERS & OBSERVATIONS 2
CAMPUS SCENE 4
ALUMNI NEWS 24
WHO, WHAT, WHEN 30
CLASS NOTES 31
SARATOGA SIDEBAR 64
Scope
zoo architect25
SPRING 2013Volume 43, Number 3
CO L LY E R V I C E P R ES I D E N T
F O R A DVA N C EM E N T
Michael Casey
E X EC U T I V E D I R E C TO R
O F C OMMUN I C AT I O N S
Dan Forbush
E D I TO R
Susan [email protected]
A S S O C I AT E E D I TO R
Paul Dwyer ’[email protected]
C L A S S N OT ES E D I TO R
Mary [email protected]
D ES I G N E R S
Michael MaloneMaryann Teale Snell
WR I T E R S
Kathryn GallienBob KimmerlePeter MacDonaldMaryann Teale Snell
Andrea Wise
E D I TO R I A L O F F I C E S
Office of CommunicationsSkidmore College815 North Broadway
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866518-580-5747
www.skidmore.edu/scope
S K I D M O R E C O L L E G E
Switchboard: 518-580-5000Alumni Affairs and College Events: 518-580-5670
Communications: 518-580-5733Admissions: 518-580-5570
or 800-867-6007
Scope is published three times a yearby Skidmore College
for alumni, parents, and friends.
Printed on recycled paper(10% postconsumer)
Scope
LET TERS
Teaching the constitutionThank you so much for presenting the
Constitutional art programs [part of the We
the People exhibition, spring Scope]. I whole-
heartedly agree that the Constitution is un-
known by a majority of people today. May it
live within the Skidmore community and pro-
vide the basis of comfort for those who ques-
tion our country’s direction. It is our roots
and foundation!
Were you aware of the Constitutional
Champions camps started in 2011 for kids in
first through sixth grades that have sprung up
all over the US? They’re supported by local
donations, but primarily the National 9–12
Liberty Movement Project.
Our local Pikes Peak Patriot 9–12 group has
had a camp in the past two summers. We re-
worked the national curriculum to fit our his-
torical backdrop of the Rock Ledge Ranch. It’s
been a huge success and all-volunteer!
You can view our camp’s experience on
www.912ppp.com.
Ann Baxter Macomber ’69
Colorado Springs, Colo.
DO THE WRITE THING
Scope welcomes letters to the editor. Send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] mail c/o Skidmore College.
Letters may be editedfor clarity and length.
Details at skidmore.edu/fosa/outing/or contact Beth Brucker-Kane: 518-580-5677 • [email protected]
or Tim Clemmey: 518-580-5621 • [email protected]
Gather a group of friends or family and make it a Saratoga weekend.Accommodations available in Skidmore’s beautiful Northwoods
Apartments. All proceeds benefit Skidmore athletics.
D
• 18 holes at the Saratoga Spa State Park Golf Course
(four-star rating by Golf Digest’s Best Places to Play)
• Tennis on Skidmore’s courts• Cocktails and buffet dinner at Skidmore
G
Tee off and serve itup for the T’breds
9TH ANNUAL THOROUGHBRED CUPGOLF AND TENNIS TOURNAMENT
SATURDAY, JUNE 22
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 3
In this issue of Scope, we explore the
College’s commitment to financial aid
and its critical role in making Skidmore
accessible to the widest possible range of
students. Unquestionably, our scholar-
ship program has paid significant divi-
dends: improving the strength and di-
versity of our student body, and thereby
enriching the lives of every student at
Skidmore.
This investment in our students has
come at a substantial cost. Since 2006,
we have expanded our financial aid
budget from $22 million to an estimated
$40 million next year—an increase of
82%. By contrast, our comprehensive fee
over that period has risen 31%. We have
funded these aid increases largely
through budget reallocation, endow-
ment growth, and gifts. During this
time, the percentage of families seeking
aid has grown by nearly a third, from
52% in 2007 to
68% for next year’s
entering class, a
trend that is likely
to continue. We
also have seen a
slow but steady rise in the average in-
debtedness of our students upon gradua-
tion. For the graduates of 2011, that fig-
ure was $21,000—lower than the nation-
al average, and quite manageable given
the value of a Skidmore education—but
significantly higher than it was in 2000.
Beyond budgetary concerns, I have
been troubled by a national trend that,
in recent years, has seen more colleges
and universities replacing need-based
aid with “merit aid,” or more accurately
“non-need-based” aid. Need-based aid
goes to students who otherwise could
not afford a college education, while
non-need-based aid is designed not to
provide access but to influence appli-
cants’ choices—to encourage prospective
students and their families to select one
institution over another.
A 2011 US Department of Education
report (Merit Aid for Undergraduates) casts
this issue in stark relief,
noting a dramatic shift in
how financial aid has been
distributed in socioeconom-
ic terms. In 1995, the study
observes, colleges gave
need-based grants almost
twice as often as non-need-
based: 43% vs. 24% at pri-
vate colleges, and 13% vs.
8% at public universities.
By 2007, the gap at private
institutions had shrunk to
44% need-based vs. 42% non-need-
based, while the percentage had actually
flipped at public universities, giving
16% need-based vs. 18% non-need-
based aid. Stated another way, by 2007
slightly less than half of aid recipients at
private institutions and slightly more
than half at public institutions received
aid that was not necessary to meet their
financial need. In
subsequent years,
this trend has
continued. Today
non-need-based
aid represents
more than 50% of all financial aid
awarded nationally.
In many cases, schools have resorted
to non-need-based aid to improve their
position in the “market” by raising the
academic profile of their student body—
for example, targeting applicants with
higher SATs and class ranks. Sometimes
they are responding to the actions of
competitor institutions. Some schools
that have struggled to enroll their in-
coming classes have made the calcula-
tion that offering non-need-based aid
will help fill otherwise empty seats with
students who will pay at least part of
their costs, thus improving the financial
bottom line. A number of public systems
(most famously Georgia’s, with its HOPE
Scholarships) have employed this ap-
proach to reduce potential “brain drain”
from their states.
The use of non-need-based aid has
certainly helped
many institutions
achieve their admis-
sions goals; however,
the cumulative effect
is ultimately nega-
tive—both for indi-
vidual schools and
for higher education
as a whole. Such a
situation is often
referred to as a
“tragedy of the com-
mons,” in which individual actors make
decisions calculated to benefit them-
selves that collectively lead to injurious
consequences for all. The problem is
that directing more aid dollars to fami-
lies without financial need and away
from those with need reduces oppor -
tu nities for students across the socio -
economic spectrum. In many cases it
also adds to the costs borne by individ-
ual schools. This outcome is a tragedy
indeed, not only for higher education
but also for our nation and the world.
Although Skidmore has two small
non-need-based scholarship programs
(Filene Scholarships in music and Porter
Scholarships in science and math), some
99% of our aid is based solely on finan-
cial need. It is important to highlight
one fallacy implied by the nomenclature
of “merit aid.” Because we are a highly
selective college, every student we aid
has proven his or her merit by satisfying
our rigorous admission standards.
Finding a way to sustain our commit-
ment to making Skidmore widely acces-
sible is critical to our mission and suc-
cess as a college. It is certainly a funda-
mental aspect of our bona fides in oper-
ating as a “public good.” Moreover, be-
cause our emphasis on need-based aid
follows directly from the commitment
that Lucy Skidmore Scribner made in
launching the school that would be-
come Skidmore, it is a proud part of
our heritage, and one I am determined
to preserve.
GARY GOLD
SKIDMORE PRESIDENT PHILIPA. GLOTZBACH
PRES IDENT ’S PERSPECT IVE
FINDING A WAY TO SUSTAIN OUR COMMITMENT TO MAKING
SKIDMORE WIDELY ACCESSIBLE ISCRITICAL TO OUR MISSION AND
SUCCESS AS A COLLEGE.
Financial aid and access
4 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
“A tide is rising in Pacific studies,”
says history professor Tillman Nechtman.
Though he’s riding that tide, his latest re-
search project sometimes leaves him feel-
ing “afloat on the sea by myself.”
Nechtman always has a lot of ground
—and a lot of ocean—to cover, consider-
ing that his specialty is the British Em-
pire. There are still 14 pieces of it, and he
was thinking of writing a book about the
persistence of empire in small remnant
states like Bermuda, the Falklands, and
Gibraltar. But when his attention fetched
up on Pitcairn Island, he knew that’s
where it would stay awhile.
A remote islet in the South Pacific,
Pitcairn was where the Bounty mutineers
took up residence with their Tahitian
women. Much has been written about
the 1789 incident, but Nechtman’s focus
is postmutiny—specifically the fraudu-
lent administration of Joshua Hill, who
posed as an official British representative
and ruled the island from 1832 to 1840.
What was to be a mere chapter in a book
on empire is growing into The Last Refuge
of Scoundrels: Pitcairn Island and the Dicta-
torship of Joshua Hill—The True Story of
the Man Who Would Be King Among the
Bounty Mutineers.
It’s a topic that
Nechtman has pretty
much all to himself.
While it may seem a
small story of a small
place, he finds it disproportionately sig-
nificant to an understanding of 18th-
century British imperialism in the Pacific.
Pitcairn has it all—a narrative of south-
sea adventure, issues of class and race,
redemption and reform, overseas power
and colonial control.
The island sparked the ambitions of
Joshua Hill, an enigmatic zealot who be-
came obsessed with saving Pitcairners
from the alcohol and immorality that
tended to come ashore with maritime
adventurers. Denied any official authori-
ty there (and dismissed by history as a
madman), Hill went to Pitcairn anyway,
presented an extravagant resume of trav-
els and connections with everyone from
European royalty to
New York’s Seneca In-
dians, declared himself
in charge, and pro-
ceeded to rule with an
iron fist.
Since Hill lied about his rights to gov-
ern the island, scholars have assumed he
also lied about his background. Necht -
man took a different tack: what if the
stories were true? So began a global
archival manhunt, which has in fact
confirmed many of Hill’s claims.
With that, Nechtman says, the ques-
tion became “Why? If you had those
kinds of connections, why would you go
to Pitcairn, this two-mile by one-mile is-
land with about 60 people on it?” The
answer he proposes is that with British
imperial might in the Pacific being
threatened by the French, Russians, and
Americans, Hill saw in Pitcairn a model
for a form of imperialism that had great
progressive and evangelical potential—
but only in the hands of the British. It
was, says Nechtman, “the perfect stage
for a colonial administrator, sane or oth-
erwise, who wanted to stand in the glob-
al imperial spotlight.”
He adds, “The detective-story aspect
of this is really fun, though I didn’t
know this little island would take up so
much of my life.” While he may never
set foot on Pitcairn—“very difficult to
reach, and very expensive”—Nechtman
is charting a research trip that would in-
clude stops in Hawaii, Tahiti, Fiji, and
Australia. Not bad, he allows: “How
many people can say they have to go to
Tahiti for work?” —KG
Beyond the Bounty
PITCAIRN HAS IT ALL—SOUTH-SEA ADVENTURE,
CLASS AND RACE, REDEMPTION AND REFORM,AND COLONIAL CONTROL.
HISTORIAN TILLMAN NECHTMAN IS NO SAILOR, BUT HIS MARITIME STUDIES COVER THENORTH ATLANTIC TO THE SOUTH PACIFIC.
GLENN DAVENPORT
From interviewing archivists, to re-
searching city registers and maps, to ana-
lyzing and shaping data for use by citi-
zens and policymakers, “history on the
hoof” is how Jordana Dym describes the
work of her “Public History” course.
A historian of Latin America whose
scholarship has covered city govern-
ments, mapping, and travel writing, Dym
wanted to bring history home and hands-
on by offering last fall’s pilot course. Little
did she know the course would be such a
hit that she’d add a two-credit workshop
in the spring, to allow some of its stu-
dents to continue their projects.
The fall students conducted research
for the Saratoga Springs Preservation
Foundation, which wanted data on the
city’s “sacred spaces”—historic churches,
temples, cemeteries—to help develop a
walking tour. (Earlier, two students had
interned with Sara Boivin ’96, the SSPF’s
outreach director, to select the sites).
After poring over documents in the pub-
lic library’s Saratoga Room, church stor-
age closets, and Skidmore’s special collec-
tions, and after interviewing historians,
clerics, congregants, and caretakers, the
students wrote papers, created the
sacredsaratoga.weebly.com Web site,
prepared oral presentations, and
even worked up a few internship
proposals. Because “we made
connections with local histori-
ans who were really excited
about what we were doing,” says
Sara Gross ’13, “I took the spring
workshop to keep working with
some of these great people.”
Among them is Teri Blasko,
who oversees the public library’s
Saratoga Room of history docu-
ments. “I’ve been impressed,”
she says, “that the students al-
ways seem well prepared before
they come to us.” She also re-
marks, “Saratoga people take
their history very seriously, and
these students have earned ac-
ceptance into the local history
community.”
Dym confirms, “I’m coaching them,
but really we’re all collaborating, doing
genuine professional history.” In one
class meeting, they discussed old maps:
sometimes labels say “Catholic church”
without “St. Peter’s”
or “St. Clement’s,”
Temple Sinai had
several headquarters
before it acquired its
own building, and a
few street names around cemeteries were
changed. Working from primary sources
can be “tedious and frustrating,” Dym ac-
knowledged with a grin, “but it results in
some wonderful discoveries.” One thing
Gross discovered was that “the sheer vol-
ume of articles, books, records, maps, and
interviews that inform a single written
history is astounding.”
The group also planned their oral pre-
sentations for the Preservation Founda-
tion and public library audience. Gross
says it was challenging to figure out
“how much content is appropriate, what
voice would be most engaging, and what
story to tell.” She adds, “I’m not used to
framing my writing this way, but it was
fun to experiment with and learn about.”
Drawing on their peers’ work from
the fall and their own distillations this
spring, the students presented Saratoga’s
spiritual traditions in local and national
contexts, including Gross discussing
Greenridge Cemetery, David Schlenker
’13 on St. Clement’s
Catholic Church,
Addy Shreffler ’13 on
Bethesda Episcopal
Church, and Sophie
Don ’14 covering
Temple Sinai. In addition, the foursome
is writing essays for the Saratogian news-
paper (with help from Dan Forbush,
Skidmore’s executive director of commu-
nications and a board member of the
Preservation Foundation) and also col-
laborating with local journalist and his-
torian Field Horne on his new book.
For her part, Dym was thrilled that
the course arrived at “one of those excit-
ing moments when you see students ap-
plying ‘traditional’ skills (research, analy-
sis), learning new ones (teamwork, ethics,
public speaking), and growing by leaps
and bounds.” She adds, “It’s a great way
to help students connect their intern-
ships with their studies. Now we’re ex -
cited to identify our next public-history
project.” —SR
“History on the hoof”
“SARATOGA PEOPLE TAKE THEIR HISTORY VERY SERIOUSLY,AND THESE STUDENTS HAVE
EARNED ACCEPTANCE INTO THELOCAL HISTORY COMMUNITY.”
BOLSTER COLLECTION
THE VAULT AT SARATOGA’S GREENRIDGE CEMETERY, AROUND THE TURN OF THE CENTURY
Ian Berry, associate director and Malloy
Curator at Skidmore’s Tang Museum, has
been named to its Dayton Directorship.
He succeeds John Weber, the Tang’s di-
rector for eight years, who left to help
found the Institute of the Arts and Sci-
ences at the University of California at
Santa Cruz.
Beau Breslin, dean of the faculty, calls
Berry “a brilliant artistic visionary, one
who not only understands the current
wave of contemporary art, but in every
way helps to shape that wave.” He says
Berry “acutely understands the impor-
tance of the Tang’s central mission as a
teaching museum.”
Berry was the Tang’s founding curator
in 2000, after serving as assistant curator
at the Williams College Museum of Art.
A SUNY-Albany graduate, he earned an
MA in curatorial studies at Bard College
in 1998. He has served and led a range
of arts councils and associations, and in
2009–10 he held
the Roy Acuff Chair
of Excellence in the
Creative Arts at
Austin Peay Univer-
sity in Tennessee.
Over the years
Berry has organ-
ized, and authored
catalogs for, many
of the Tang’s most
memorable shows.
He worked closely
with artists such as
Nayland Blake,
Kate Ericson and
Mel Ziegler, Nina Katchadourian, Los
Carpinteros, Shahzia Sikander, Fred
Tomaselli, and Kara Walker. And his ap-
proach to collaborating with faculty on
large interdisciplinary shows—from
Mapping Art and Science to Lives of the
Hudson to We the People—has become a
national model for best practices in col-
lege museums.
Berry says he’s honored to serve as di-
rector, adding, “It is a pleasure to be part
of a great team that lives the museum’s
mission in every part of our daily work.”
—BK, SR
Berry leads Tang
RUSTY RUSSELL
CURATOR IAN BERRY IS THE NEW DAYTON DIRECTOR OF THETANG MUSEUM.
6 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
The Skidmore faculty bade farewell
this term to retiring professors Roy Mey-
ers and Linda Simon.
Meyers joined the biology faculty in
1971, finishing his PhD at SUNY’s
Downstate Medical Center the next year.
He helped shape Skidmore’s University
Without Walls and taught early and
often in its program for prison inmates.
Over the years Meyers taught a wide
range of physiology courses and intro-
duced computer modeling of physiologi-
cal functions
and interven-
tions. Meyers
published in
major journals
on both phys-
iology and
computers in
pedagogy, and
he served on
Skidmore’s
pre-med ad-
vising com-
mittee.
His Web-Human physiology simula-
tor (co-authored in the late 1990s and
frequently updated ever since) allows
students to conduct finely tuned, com-
plex experiments testing combinations
of physiological functions, treatments,
and reactions—from symptoms to lab
analyses to diagnoses—through com -
puter modeling, without risking the
health of a live subject. The tool has
been adopted by thousands of professors
and researchers around the world, who
run some 100,000 experiments each year.
Simon came to Skidmore in 1997,
with a Brandeis PhD in English and
American literature and 14 years on Har-
vard’s English faculty. She taught fiction
and nonfiction writing, 19th- and early
20th-century American lit, and courses
on the memoir, contemporary imagina-
tion, and other topics.
A prolific scholar and writer, Simon
published articles on Upton Sinclair,
John Cheever, women’s biographies,
Jane Austen, Charles Reznikoff, writing
across the curriculum, and more. Her
books include The Biography of Alice B.
Toklas (1977), Thornton Wilder: His World
(1979), Of Virtue Rare: Margaret Beaufort,
Matriarch of the House of Tudor (1982),
Genuine Reality: A Life of William James
(1998), Dark Light: Electricity and Anxiety
from the Telegraph to the X-Ray (2004),
and Coco Chanel (2011), as well as several
textbooks on writing. She is the general
editor for the journal William James Stud-
ies and for the Camden House series Mind
and American Literature. —SR
Meyers and Simon retire
ROY MEYERS LINDA SIMON
GLENN DAVENPORT
SAM BROOK ’12
What’s the best new thing in cleaning?One of the best innovations at Skidmorehas been our autoscrubbers. They usejust water to polish our terrazzo floors,and the results look better than when weused detergents. Plus, we don’t have toapply finish anymore, which also meanswe never need to strip the finish withsolvents. It’s especially good for our sci-ence labs, where any fumes or chemicalexposure could cause problems.For carpets also, we don’t use deter-
gents. We use a truck-mounted steamcleaner with water at 180 degrees,which is hot enough to sanitize withoutchemicals. We sometimes use stain re-movers for small spots, but steam clean-ing on a regular basis keeps those to aminimum.And I think the polished-concrete
floors in the Northwoods apartmentcomplex are workingwonderfully. Afterthey get 30 weeks—that’s one semester—
of heavy use,
we can come in, scrub them right up,apply a very thin coat of polish, and theylook terrific again. I bet we’re using 80 or90 percent less products there than weneed on some of our tile and other floors.
Do “green” products work well enough? We started using a wider range of greencleaners back in 2000, after the govern-ment issued new regulations abouthousekeeping products. Back then, it’strue, a lot of those alternatives weren’t aseffective, but over the past decade therehave been huge improvements, not justfor institutional use but for consumerstoo. Clorox, for example, has a line of
green cleaners with no chlorinebleach in them, and I thinkthey’re very good. At myhouse, I don’t think we use anycleaners that aren’t green. At Skidmore we recently
switched our glass and all-purpose cleaners to a perox-ide-based alternative. Formany applications, we needto use certified disinfec-tants, and our peroxidecleaner is starting the processof getting certified. We’d loveit if that succeeds and wecould use it in place of theharsher disinfectants. As it is,we don’t use bleach or am-monia—they’re just too po-tent, and no longer neces-sary. The green products arebetter for the environment,the employees, and the oc-cupants. Same for the interi-or paints we use now:they’re not just low-VOC,but certified green. Thefumes are so minimal andso harmless that we canpaint while people are still
in their offices right down the hall andthey don’t even notice an odor.
What about cloth vs. paper?A great new product is microfiber wipesand mops. Unlike paper towels, they’rereusable—we can put them through thelaundry 500 times! And unlike cloth,they rinse and wring out so clean thatthey don’t hold dirt and germs, and theydry quickly. For mopping, they’re muchbetter than cotton string mops, whichare heavy to handle, need bleach to dis-infect them, and take a lot of drying toprevent mildew. We love the microfiber.
What’s the toughest cleaning job? Showers and tubs, definitely. Like all ofSaratoga, Skidmore has pretty hardwater. But even in the bathrooms weuse green products. (If a mineral de-posit has built up a lot, first we try ascrubbing pad and elbow grease toscrape it off. We rarely use solvents likeLime Away—they’re dangerous and canerode the metal faucets and fixtures.) Ifwe use our peroxide cleaner regularly—and if we make sure to dry off the sur-faces right afterward—we don’t havemuch trouble with mineral buildups. Infact, this cleans better than our previousbathroom products.
Do you do spring cleanings? The best method is to keep on top ofcleaning year-round. If you maintainthings regularly, you don’t need toschedule any special big cleaning. Butit’s nice, after a stuffy winter, even if it’sstill a little chilly, to open up the win-dows and air out the house.
Richard Mickus kept Union College cleanbefore moving to Skidmore as supervisorof custodial operations in 2000; he nowmanages both housekeeping and painting.
EXPERT OPINION: Green clean with Richard Mickus
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 7
MARK BOLLES
8 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
...almost anything, Skidmore’s guest
lectures embrace a huge array of academ-
ic and/or timely topics. A small sampling
of this year’s offerings:
• “New Age Imperialism: A Crisis in Pan-
African Conscience” by Dhoruba Bin
Wahad, former Black Panther and
Black Liberation Army cofounder
• “Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life,
Death, and Hope in a Mumbai Under -
city,” by Katherine Boo (First-Year
Ex perience author), New Yorker
• “The Crisis of Zionism,” by Peter Beinart
(Perlow Lecturer), City University of
New York and New America Foundation
• “Can the Constitution Cope with Our
Polarized Politics?” by Paul Pierson,
UC-Berkeley
• “Reading the Forested Landscape: A
Natural History of New England,” by
Tom Wessels, Antioch University of
New England
• “Inventing the Fetish: Voodoo, Reli-
gion, and the European Thing for
African Objects,” by Elizabeth Perez,
Dartmouth College
Speaking of...
WATERLOGGING 8
DAN FORBUSH
In probably the first-ever intercollegiate log-rolling competition, Skid-more’s Will Hoeschler ’14, at right, spins Middlebury’s John Wyman into thedrink. On the greenhorn Skidmore team, Hoeschler is the star, having wonworld titles at age 6, 13, and 17, but Middlebury has had three stars over theyears, in Hoeschler’s three sisters—all thanks to their mom, Judy Scheer-Hoeschler, a seven-time champion log-roller from Wisconsin. In the William -son Sports Center pool, Middlebury dominated by 6-1, with Hoeschler earningthe lone Skidmore win. His advice for learners: “Never stop moving, and keepwatching your opponent’s feet.” —SR
worth thetrip from
anywhere!
June 6--9, 2013saratogaartsfest.org
Join us in Saratoga Springs for our seventh annual citywide celebration of the arts—music,dance, visual art, film, theatre, andliterary art.
Winter featured ice hockey’s Packthe Rink and basketball’s Big GreenScream. Both occasions featured lotsof green face paint, Skids the mas-cot, and cheering fans of all ages.Riding. Again undefeated in the regular season, Skidmore qualified15 equestrians for this year’s Inter-collegiate Horse Show regionals and was preparing for another trip to nationals in May. Basketball. The men went 15-11 enroute to their fourth consecutive Lib-erty League playoff appearance.Skidmore lost a tight game, 77-72, to eventual champion Ho-bart in the semifinals. AldinMedunjanin ’16 (at right)was a Liberty, ECAC Up-state, and d3hoops.comRookie of the Year, and Tanner Brooks ’16 was aleague all-rookie selection. At 12-14, the women made
the Liberty tournament butlost to St. Lawrence by 58-44 in the opening round. JordynWartts ’14 was the league’s Defen-sive Player of the Year; Angela Boti-ba ’15 was a first-team all-confer-ence selection; Dani De Gregory ’16and Skylar Caligaris ’16 made theleague’s all-rookie team. Ice hockey. After posting an 11-13-2record, the Thoroughbreds earned atrip to the ECAC East playoffs, wherethey fell to eventual champion Bab-son, 7-1, in the quarterfinals. ZachMenard ’13 was an ECAC East first-team selection, and Jack Even ’16made the all-rookie team.Swimming and diving. The womenhad one of their highest UNYSCSAfinishes ever, taking seventh place.The team broke 16 Skidmore records,led by a 5:10.12 third-place finish byCarrie Koch ’13 in the 500 freestyleand a 24.03 fourth place by Cather-ine King ’15 in the 50 free. The pairhas combined for eight individual andfive relay-team records. The men also had one of their best
finishes at states, taking ninth. Theyset 12 new Skidmore records, includ -ing all five relays. Jesse Adler ’13set three new individual marks andMario Hyman ’16 set two. —SeanFarnsworth
THOROUGHBRED NEWS:Get full results and schedules for allteams at skidmoreathletics.com.
4SPORTSWRAPGOOD PLAY8
BLOCKER OR NO,ALL-ACADEMICFORWARD MOLLYGILE ’13 GOESFOR HER SHOT.
BOB EWELL PHOTOS
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 9
Join the Skidmore College Legacy Society through a gift from your estate,or a gift that pays you income for life. Help guarantee the tradition of creative
excellence at Skidmore for future generations. Plan your Legacy today.
[email protected] • 518.580.5655 • www.skidmore.edu/giftplanning
“A Skidmore annuity lets
me show my gratitude for
the education I received.”
—Susie Tucker-Ross ’74,
Gift annuity donor
“Joe and Edwin would be veryproud to see Skidmore today.”—Anne Palamountain, Gift annuity, bequest, and pooled income fund donor “Happy Pappy weekend left me with some of my favorite Skidmore memories.”—Sheila Salvo ’59, Bequest donor
“Skidmore friends last forever.”
—Barbara Collyer ’52, Trust donor
“Some of my fondest memories and friendships were formed in Skidmore Hall.”—Florence Andresen ’57, Bequest donor
Legacysociety
Honor the past. Provide for the future.
GIFT PLANNING FOR SKIDMORE
12 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
In other ways, the stresses and strains couldn’t be more
different. In 1973 Skidmore received 1,700 applications,
roughly 95% of which were accepted. In those “lean” years,
Bates recalls, “a student with a solid record could show up in
August and join the freshman class.” This year, Skidmore re-
ceived a record-breaking 8,200-plus applications, of which
only 35% were accepted, a selectivity rate that underscores
its standing as one of the nation’s top liberal arts colleges.
The angst for Bates and her admissions
staff isn’t about filling the class; it’s about
having to turn away well-qualified appli-
cants when the pool of aid money runs
dry. In 2012 the disparity between their
financial need and Skidmore’s available financial-aid dollars
was $2.3 million. And that gulf is widening. Despite expand-
ing its resources earmarked for financial aid year after year,
ultimately the College must stay out of the red and refrain
from drastic cuts in other areas. Says Beth Post-Lundquist,
director of financial aid, “We’ve stretched as far as we can.
We never want to turn anyone down because of money, but
even with the infusion of new aid dollars, we simply
don’t have enough to go around, particularly when we
need to honor the ongoing aid commitments to our re-
turning students.”
Of course, Skidmore has met the demonstrated financial
need of thousands of worthy students over the years, and
thereby helped transform their lives. Students such as Alta -
gracia Montilla ’12, a coach for a Chicago-based nonprofit
that prepares underprivileged high school students for col-
lege. And entrepreneur C. Jerome Mopsik ’06, a business ana-
lyst for a Saratoga-area company that acquires and manages
animal hospitals. And Nancy Wells Hamilton ’77, a partner
with the Houston law firm of Jackson
Walker who has a national practice in First
Amendment law, intellectual property, and
commercial litigation (with clients includ-
ing Oprah Winfrey, CBS, and CNN). Their
career successes—in many ways, the very shape and texture
of their lives—are directly linked to the financial aid they re-
ceived from Skidmore. An effervescent, first-generation col-
lege student from the Bronx, Montilla had no family resources
to put on the table. Mopsik came from an upper-middle-class
Philadelphia family, which translated into just a modest aid
award; his parents gladly made the extra reach to send him
and his sister to top liberal arts colleges. Hamilton,
from Red Bank, N.J., would have been limited to a
state school had it not been for Skidmore’s support,
along with contributions from her grandparents.
Two years after Mary Lou Bates graduated from college in 1972, she took a jobat Skidmore’s admissions office. Nearly 40 years later, and now the dean of ad-missions and financial aid, she’s still making her daily commute, reading appli-cations, visiting high schools and college fairs, answering parents’ questions.And losing sleep over bringing in each new class.
BETH POST-LUNDQUIST DIGESTS A LOT OF STUDENT-AID INFORMATION SO THAT APPLICANTS DON’T HAVE TO.
“IT’S INCREDIBLY HARD ANY TIME WE CAN’T ADMIT A COM-PELLING STUDENT BECAUSE OFLIMITED AID RESOURCES.”
...THE STRESS OF SUCCESS
MARK MCCARTY
“Financial aid did basically everything for me,” says Mon-
tilla. Starting college was a huge step for her: “I was so lost
when I first came to Skidmore. So alone. Now, I’m a com-
pletely different person—I want to say, woman—because I’ve
grown up so much. I’m confident and happy. I don’t feel like
I’m behind anyone at all.” As for getting virtually all of her
college costs covered, the psychology major says, “I felt
some initial guilt, because it was a lot of money and no one
from home was doing what I was doing. Then I thought
about all the work I’d put in to get to this point, and I real-
ized that I deserved it. I was so motivated and wanted to
prove myself—that was a big deal to me.”
This year Skidmore awarded $36 million in grants to
1,150 students, about 44% of the student body. The average
grant amount was $31,315—twice what it was in 2003–04.
This 10% annual growth rate over the past decade has easily
outpaced increases in Skidmore’s comprehensive fee and
overall US inflation. But it has also placed increasing stress
on College finances, especially as employee health care,
technology, and other costs have been claiming more budget
dollars at the same time. As a percentage of its operating
budget ($135 million this year), Skidmore aid has grown in
the past decade from 15% to 22%, a clear reflection of the
institution’s unflagging commitment to broad access. Alum-
ni, parents, and friends have supported this commitment by
contributing more than $60 million for scholarships over
the same decade. Yet even with these investments, Skidmore
officials have struggled to keep up with the demand. Be-
tween 2007 and 2013, the percentage of applicants request-
ing aid has risen from 52% to 68%. And while the propor-
tion of students receiving aid has expanded by 20% over the
past decade-plus, Bates still finds it “incredibly hard any
time we can’t admit a compelling student because of limited
aid resources.”
What is financial aid really worth?Thanks in part to its determination to find more aid dollars
in tough times, Skidmore has seen an important shift in the
composition of its student body. American students of color
increased from 13% of the student body in 2003 to 22% in
2012, and the international student population leapt from
1% to 6% (today’s students come from 43 states and 51
countries). These changing demographics are already being
cited for helping to enhance the intercultural understanding
of all students—a key goal of Skidmore’s current strategic
plan. “Recent studies and firsthand experience tell us that
diversity increases the intellectual and cultural vitality of our
academic community,” asserts President Philip Glotzbach.
“Likewise, it links directly with creative thought. Interac-
tions among disparate perspectives frequently strike the in-
tellectual sparks that herald the emergence of a new idea.”
Bates is hardly one for hyperbole, but even she can’t resist
touting Skidmore’s progress in opening its doors wider than
they’ve ever been. She says, “Considering our relatively
small endowment when compared with our peers, our com-
mitment to access and diversity is second to none.” Skid-
more’s endowment is squarely in the middle in a 17-member
peer set (with the likes of Vassar, Colgate, Kenyon, Sarah
Lawrence, and Trinity), yet in student diversity it scored
fourth in US News & World Report’s 2011–12 “Campus Ethnic
Diversity” breakdowns.
At the same time, Skidmore’s retention rate (freshmen
returning as sophomores) has been climbing and now stands
at 92%, and its six-year graduation rate is 88%, both strong
figures. One example Bates points to is the College’s oppor-
tunity programs, which enroll and mentor students who
come from disadvantaged secondary-school backgrounds but
who show the ability and drive to flourish at Skidmore. Serv-
ing 170 students (over 5% of the student body), these pro-
grams have been hailed as national models not only for
widening access but also for fostering high student achieve-
ment, from grade-point averages to graduation rates.
Another aspect of Skidmore aid that gives students a leg
up is its attention to helping families keep their indebted-
ness reasonable. Rather than spreading smaller aid amounts
among as many applicants as possible, Skidmore provides a
complete package to each student it aids. As aid director
Post-Lundquist says, “Skidmore’s policy is to meet the full
need of everyone it admits; we don’t gap.” Gapping, or offer-
ing less aid than a student’s full need, is a growing practice at
many colleges and universities. The problem, Post-Lundquist
notes, is that gapped students often resort to taking on moreg
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 13
aid amounts awarded
skidmore aid awarded
aid recipients, number
aid recipients, % of class
average aid package
tuition and fees
$17.6 mil
1,008
42.2%
$17,466
$39,815
$19.9 mil
1,051
42%
$18,929
$41,780
$21.4 mil
1,038
40.8%
$20,653
$44,250
$24.3 mil
1,057
41%
$23,021
$46,696
$26.5 mil
1,088
42.1%
$24,322
$49,265
$28.9 mil
1,120
43.3%
$25,805
$51,196
$32.1 mil
1,167
43.6%
$27,505
$52,170
$32.9 mil
1,127
42.8%
$29,240
$53,684
$36.2 mil
1,156
44.2%
$31,315
$55,764
2004–05 2005–06 2006–07 2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13
14 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
loans, which at best makes
for heavy debt burdens by
the time they graduate; at
worst, she says, “it adds the
risk of extending the number
of years it takes them to
graduate, or even prevents
some from graduating.”
Compared to its peers, Skid-
more is in the lower third
when it comes to the average
debt of graduates. For the
class of 2011 it was $21,000,
well below New York State
and national averages.
Tuition economicsThat Skidmore has boosted
its financial aid budget and
its diversity while maintain-
ing its median SAT scores and
even improving other aca-
demic measures is remark-
able, given 2008’s global fi-
nancial crash and sluggish
economy ever since. In the
decade of 2001–11 American
incomes from all strata, even
the top 5%, did not rise, ac-
cording to a College Board
report co-authored by Sandy
Baum, professor emerita of
economics. With incomes
still shrinking, the average
student’s net price (that’s
out-of-pocket, work-study,
and loan commitments,
apart from grant aid) at a four-year school is up 4% from
last year—double the rate of inflation. The average debt for
a private-college graduate, $29,900 in 2011, also rose more
than inflation, at 3.5%. Meanwhile, inflation-adjusted gov-
ernment funding for postsec-
ondary education fell again,
by 5%.
But in her analyses Baum
also emphasizes longer-term
trends, which are still positive
for students hoping to attend
private colleges. There, tui tion
and fees (adjusted for infla-
tion) over the past decade
rose just 2.4%, compared to
3% and 4.6% in the two pre-
vious decades. By contrast,
those same costs for public
colleges and universities grew
twice as fast in the past de -
cade, at 5.2%. Which is not to
say there aren’t warning signs
for privates. Baum’s concern
is that “even the incomes of
people at the top are going
down, and those are the peo-
ple who are supposed to be
able to pay without dipping
into their savings.”
At Skidmore 56% of fami-
lies do pay on their own. An
often-forgotten fact, however,
is that the true cost of educat-
ing each Skidmore student is
higher than tuition and fees.
In 2011–12 the cost was
pegged at $62,700, a full
$9,000 more than that year’s
$53,700 comprehensive fee.
In effect, every student is sub-
sidized to some extent by
Skidmore’s endowment earnings, donations, and other in-
come. Still, the post-2008 economy has changed both the
wallets and the mindsets of full-pay families, according to
Bates and Post-Lundquist. “Many of our fellow schools in
15.4%
Budgeting financial aid
Aid as % of Skidmore budget
16.7%
77.4%
5.9%
16.7%
19.3%
74.4%
6.4%
17.2%
14.0%
80.5%
5.5%
17.7%
15.8%
77.0%
7.2%
16.8%
16.1%
75.8%
8.1%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
LIKE ALMOST ALL COLLEGES, Skidmore builds each aidpackage starting with a federal, low-interest Stafford or Per -kins loan, usually restricted to $3,000 or $4,000; next it addsa federally subsidized work-study job, usually limited to about$2,000; it looks for small state or federal grants to add; andthen it tries to fill the rest of the need with grants from its ownaid budget. Last year Skidmore’s contributions ranged from$2,000 to $56,000 depending on demonstrated need.
One example: Felipe had $5,000 in savings; his parentshad $280,000 in home equity, $30,000 in savings, and anannual income of $105,000. Skidmore asked his parents tocontribute $8,700 of their income, $3,000 from savings, and$10,000 from a Parents Loan and asked Felipe for $2,000of summer-job earnings and $1,000 from his savings. Skid-more offered the rest, their calculated need of $31,700, as a$26,200 College grant, a federal work-study job for $2,000,and $3,500 in federal loans.
A second scenario: Lisa lived with her divorced mother,who had $60,000 and an income of $62,000 including childsupport. Skidmore asked her mom to pay $5,000 and her dadto pay $6,000 (in 10 installments over the year), while Lisacontributed summer-job earnings of $2,000. That left $43,400in need, which was covered by $37,900 in Skidmore grants,a $2,000 work-study job, and $3,500 in federal loans.
CALCULATING NEEDS AND AWARDS
Aid from operating budget Aid from gifts/grants Aid from endowed scholarships
JON REINFURT
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 15
g
the top 50 of US News & World Report’s rankings are pro -
viding non-need-based or ‘merit’ aid,” Post-Lundquist says.
“At some of our peers 30% of financial aid is non-need-
based, while at Skidmore just 1% of our aid is.” In today’s
admissions and aid race, she reports,
“Parents tell us about the packages that
other colleges are offering them and ask
us what we can do. Or they tell us their
child was admitted to a very selective
elite school, so they expect some ‘merit’ aid from us to
sweeten the pot.”
With its emphasis on access and affordability, Skidmore
has stood firm on restricting its non-need aid to the long-
standing Filene Music and Porter Presidential Math and Sci-
ence scholarships for
about 12 incoming
students each year.
In reconfirming this
pol icy at last Octo-
ber’s trustee meeting,
Skidmore leaders
agreed to accept the
price: losing some top
applicants who get
wooed elsewhere with
‘merit aid’ offers.
“The bigger price,”
says Glotz bach,
“would be turning
our back on the prin-
ciple that a Skidmore
education should be
available to qualified
students regardless of
their abil ity to pay. Arguably, every non-need-based dollar
we offer takes away from what we can provide to those who
truly need it. If we expect to graduate students who are ethi-
cal and who value the common good, then Skidmore has to
model this kind of behavior.”
These days, even the most elite and highly resourced
schools are feeling squeezed, according to a recent New York
Times article on aid and diversty. Wesleyan had been “need-
blind”—admitting students without regard to their ability to
pay, because it knew it could meet their need—but it has
backed off slightly, now accepting 10% of its freshman class-
es from candidates who can pay full fare.
Another well-funded college, Grinnell, is
also considering becoming “need-sensi-
tive.” Williams and Dartmouth, which
had provided their aid exclusively through
grants, are beginning to include student loans as part of
their packages.
There’s no escaping the math. “Skidmore’s current oper-
ating budget is predicated on 42% of our students receiving
aid,” Bates notes, “yet 68% of our applicants requested it.”
Earnings from the en-
dowment provided
nearly 20% of the fi-
nancial aid budget in
2003–04, but after the
down markets in recent
years, that figure has
fallen below 12%. Little
wonder that Skidmore
too is becoming more
need-sensitive; Bates
now estimates that the
College accepts 25% of
each incoming class
with some considera-
tion for the families’
ability to pay on their
own. “We’ve wanted
to build our applicant
pool in part to build
the number and strength of those who don’t need aid,” she
acknowledges, so this year’s big spike in applications was
gratifying on several levels.
Price vs. valueJerome Mopsik came to Skidmore as a transfer student, able
to make the move thanks to an aid package that included
19.1%
15.6%
77.7%
6.7%
19.9%
13.5%
78.1%
8.4%
21.3%
13.4%
79.0%
7.6%
21.7%
11.6%
82.5%
6.9%
21.1%
13.3%
79.8%
7.0%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
MARY LOU BATES AND HER ADMISSIONS STAFF REALLY DO LOVE OPENING DOORS.
“PARENTS TELL US ABOUT OTHER COLLEGES’ OFFERS, AND
EXPECT SOME ‘MERIT’ AID FROM US TO SWEETEN THE POT.”
GLENN DAVENPORT
one of the College’s Palamountain Scholarships. Mopsik’s
father, Eugene, a Penn grad and executive director of a pho -
to graphers’ trade association, was unswayed by money mat-
ters. He avows “a deep personal commitment to higher edu-
cation. It’s the best investment parents can make to allow
their children to take maximum advantage of what life has
to offer.” He says, “Skidmore’s value proposition was extra -
ordinary: the resources per student were very inviting, the
facilities were overwhelmingly good, the town had a lot to
offer. Our family made a decision that we
were going to do whatever we needed to.”
Not everyone is as bullish as the Mop-
siks about the value of a four-year degree.
A recent New York Times article, “The Old
College Try? No Way,” asks pointed questions: Why go into
debt with no guarantee of a job? Why not undertake your
own self-directed learning, as UnCollege.org recommends?
Why not just drop out like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Mark
Zuckerberg, who made millions? The answer, it turns out, is
clear and compelling. Apart from very rare exceptions, it
pays to go to college. A 2010 College Board analysis calcu-
lates that the median earnings of bachelor’s degree recipients
working full-time in 2008 were more than twice those of
high school graduates. By age 33, these higher earnings off-
set not only the four college years spent outside the labor
force but also the average tuition and fee payments at a pub-
lic four-year university funded fully by student loans.
Moreover, grads from liberal arts colleges say they feel bet-
ter prepared for life’s challenges, including careers, than do
those from private or public universities, according to a 2011
national study commissioned by the Annapolis Group, a con-
sortium of leading liberal arts colleges. In the survey, 79% of
liberal arts grads rated their college experience as highly ef-
fective in pre paring them for a first job or admission to grad
school, compared to 73% from private universities and 64%
from national flagship universities. More striking was that
77% rated their undergraduate experience as “excellent,” as
against 59% from privates and 53% from flagships. On vir -
tually every measure known to contribute to positive out-
comes—challenging professors, small
classes, mentoring—the liberal arts grad -
uates rated their experiences more highly
than did university graduates.
Additionally, liberal arts schools, while
representing just 3% of American higher education, produce
a disproportionate number of successful graduates and lead-
ers. A 2012 count showed that, per capita, liberal arts colleges
turned out twice as many students who earned PhDs in sci-
ence as did other institutions. A 1998 study found that liber-
al arts schools turned out 19% of US presidents; 8% of the
wealthiest CEOs and 8% of Peace Corps volunteers; 23%,
19%, and 18% of Pulitzer Prize winners in drama, history,
and poetry; and many more.
The way forwardAt the end of the day, financial aid isn’t about numbers. It’s
about the students who are transformed by a Skidmore edu -
cation because of that aid. And therefore it’s also about the
alumni, parents, and others who understand the value, not
just to the student recipients but to the campus community as
16 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
“I CAME TO SKIDMORE ON FINANCIAL AID AND HAVE BEENFOREVER GRATEFUL TO THOSEWHO MADE THAT POSSIBLE.”
franklin & marshall college
gettysburg college
dickinson college
Bard college
connecticut college
st. lawrence university
union college
wheaton college
skidmore college
Bates college
trinity college
hamilton college
colgate university
kenyon college
sarah lawrence college
Vassar college
oberlin college
$31,617
$29,067
$26,928
$26,897
$26,545
$26,270
$26,252
$25,778
$21,000
$20,706
$20,367
$20,262
$19,721
$19,480
$18,360
$18,150
$16,813
student deBt comparison Average debt burden of borrowers, upon graduation in the class of 2011
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 17
a whole, and who make that knowledge material as donors.
Lawyer Nancy Hamilton says, “I came to Skidmore on fi-
nancial aid back in the 1970s and have been forever grateful
to those who made that possible.” She calls the growth in
financial aid and diversity at her alma mater “a signature
achievement” demonstrating that “Skidmore has its priori-
ties straight.” A trustee, alumni board member, and longtime
supporter of scholar-
ship aid, she has en-
joyed returning to
campus for the annu-
al scholarship din-
ners, where recipients
and donors have a
chance to meet. She
reports, “Many stu-
dents are surprised to
learn that I and many
others were also fi-
nancial aid recipients.
My hope is that
they’ll be inspired to
give as well. To me,
scholarship gifts are
not so much about
paying as they are
about paying forward,
investing in the fu-
ture. The return on
that investment—
someone like me,
sometime down the
road—makes it the
best investment
you’ll ever make.”
Hamilton adds
that the average debt
for a Skidmore educa-
tion “seems eminent-
ly reasonable” com-
pared to the far larger debt burden of some grads, especially
those from the for-profit institutes. She says, “We know the
intrinsic value of the Skidmore experience—from having close
relationships with outstanding faculty (expert, dedicated pro-
fessors, not just graduate students) to having seats available in
courses so that students can graduate in their chosen major
within four years. Supporting financial aid extends those life-
changing educational opportunities to more students.”
Jerome Mopsik is on board with giving back, too. The for-
mer Palamountain Scholar is now an organizer, along with
wife Emily Carnevale Mopsik ’07, for this year’s Palamoun-
tain Scholarship polo benefit. He declares it “the best deal in
town for a summer gala. The best food, the best company.
It’s just $125 per person. And it all goes to financial aid.”
These and other scholarship supporters, from every era
and area, tend to share a belief in liberal education as a
personal, professional, and public good. Skidmore’s codi-
fied “Goals for Student Learning and Development” set an
expectation that graduates will, among many other things,
acquire discipline-specific knowledge; understand social
and cultural diversity;
develop advanced
learning skills, in clud-
ing the capacity to
think critically, cre-
atively, and independ-
ently; and hone their
ability to analyze, inte-
grate, and apply infor-
mation and communi-
cate the findings effec-
tively. It’s a “daunting”
list, as Glotzbach ad-
mitted at last year’s
commencement cere-
mony, but, he told the
new grads, “the intel-
lectual and ethical tool
kit you have acquired
through your Skid-
more education pro-
vides you the best
possible platform for
success in a world
marked above all by
rapid, persistent, and
unpredictable change.”
It’s no coincidence
that it’s the same tool
kit expressly sought,
more and more ur-
gently, by medical
schools, law schools,
and employers in practically every profession.
Educational like that doesn’t come cheap. What Skidmore
does is necessarily cost-intensive—from its large faculty and
personalized mentoring, to its laboratory, studio, athletics,
and other resources, to its comprehensive First-Year Experi-
ence program, to its research, service, internship, travel, and
other opportunities. But the more world crises that arise, the
more Glotzbach sees Skidmore as an incubator of creative
problem-solvers. That’s why he and Bates and other Skid-
more leaders not only defend the value of its ever more cost-
ly education, but also insist that it should be able to work its
magic on a diverse community of the best and brightest stu-
dents regardless of their finances.
JON REINFURT
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 19
Pour on some politics, global trade, and high tech, and it’s
no wonder we devour news headlined “‘Pink slime’ served
in school lunches,” “Drought threatens nation’s wheat
crop long term,” “Health secrets of the shopping cart,”
“Food-borne diseases rising,” and “Helping cities feed
themselves.” Every budget cycle, legislators wrangle over
federal farm subsidies, even though two-thirds of Ameri-
can farmers never collect one, according to an OnEarth
magazine article. From 1995 to 2012, OnEarth estimates,
nearly 90% of agricultural subsidy money went to just
20% of farms—the biggest holdings, owned by megacor-
porations like Monsanto, Cargill, and ConAgra. Subsidized
or not, much of what’s grown in America’s breadbasket we
never see on a plate. Corn goes for
sweetener, cattle feed, and ethanol fuel;
a lot of wheat is exported; soy is pro -
cessed into additives as well as chow
for farm animals from hogs to chickens
to salmon. Nearly all corn, soy, and
canola is now grown from genetically modified seed, and
the growth hormone administered to dairy cattle is itself
genetically modified.
Is this food system intensive and efficient, or a rapa-
cious agro-industrial monster? Several Skidmore minds, on
campus and off, are helping to lead new thinking on such
issues, and Scope asked a few of them for insights.
More and smaller Economics professor Mehmet Odekon has guided students
in collaborative summer research on food-chain market
sectors. They found that between 1997 and 2007 just 10
companies shared 56% of the seed market; in agrochemi-
cals, the top 10 firms had an 89% share. And those top 10s
add up to less than 20, since firms like Monsanto and
DuPont are in both oligopolies. The project’s conclusions
recommended policy changes to diversify the markets and
support smaller-scale farming.
Lauren Mandel ’05 is documenting the role of urban
agriculture on rooftops. A landscape architect and green-
roof designer, she reports, “Some colleges and schools are
planting their roofs with edibles. Restaurants are too, grow-
ing heirloom vegetables that are hard to find elsewhere.
Urbanites are beginning to realize that you can’t get any
more local than your own roof!” Mandel covers this trend
in her new book Eat Up: The Inside Scoop on Rooftop Agricul-
ture. She says large warehouse roofs are even hosting “com-
mercial-scale farms, some with a few chickens or rabbits
(for meat as well as manure), and some with bee hives” to
help ensure pollination so high off the ground.
Hydroponics, using liquid nutrients rather than soil, is
ideal for roof-mounted greenhouses. Mandel writes about
greenhouse farms on Montreal roofs, and she says the
Whole Foods chain buys from “a New York operation like
this to get fresh year-round produce at competitive prices.”
Hydroponics, she suggests, “can feed a lot of people with
very little labor, because it’s often highly mechanized.”
Biology professor Monica Raveret-Richter agrees that
“high-input methods of agriculture are
not the only route to high yields.”
Raveret-Richter, who has researched
foraging behaviors in social animals
from insects to birds to humans,
teaches a popular course on the ecolo-
gy of food and is currently writing a book on it. She says,
“Understanding how the environment and evolution in-
fluence your choices really changes your way of approach-
ing the food landscape.”
Raveret-Richter’s advice is to eat less meat, since raising
animals is an extremely high-input enterprise. But with
any food, she says, “eating close to the source” directs
more of the price to the grower, reduces shipping and stor-
age, and shortens the production line from farm to table.
She also calls for policy-level action, to cut back support
for monocultured commodities such as corn and wheat
and to boost it for “diversified, low-input, organic farms.”
She says data show that “we can feed people this way. Our
challenge for advancing agriculture should be in produc-
tivity and sustainability, not just output.” Such farming,
she adds, also “improves resilience in times or places of
food insecurity.”
Journalist and food blogger Mary Nelen ’79 points back
to Skidmore as “a good example of local food in action.”
Student advocacy for more locally raised products in the
dining hall led to deals with area farmers and spurred the
creation of the campus garden that now supplies hun-
dreds of pounds of organic produce to the College’s dining
service. Nelen was impressed that the students weren’t
taking agriculture courses or getting academic credit but
“FOOD IS NOT JUST PART OF OUR PHYSICAL FABRIC.It’s part of our growing up and family life. We engage with it, usual-ly in a group, at least a few times every day,” notes Spanish pro-fessor and cultural scholar Viviana Rangil. From body-mass indexto tastes and taboos, our very identity is shaped by the food we eat.
g
20 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
simply “wanted better food and taught themselves how
to grow it. Can this be duplicated in other environments?
I think it can. Almost all of us should be doing it.” She’s
currently writing a book titled From Scratch.
With organic gardens and farmers’ markets spreading,
“this is a promising time,” Andrew Plotsky ’00 declares.
People like him, alarmed that “we have the fewest farm-
ers we’ve ever had in this country” and eager to fix “a
broken system,” are picking up shovels and, in his case,
going online. Serving small farmers around Washington’s
Puget Sound, he works for a local butchering company
and also owns FarmRun, a media and
marketing business. A self-taught pork
connoisseur, he also raises a few her-
itage-breed pigs for himself, focusing on
healthy, natural husbandry, humane
slaughtering and hand-butchering, and
old-fashioned, artisanal curing.
“There’s a lot of romance flying
around in portrayals of small-farm life,” Plotsky cautions.
“My friends and I know how it really works—how freakin’
hard it is—but we’re committed to the economy and well-
being of our small group.” He believes their paradigm has
real promise to contribute to “a radical revisiting of classi-
cal agrarian society, which doesn’t go backward but uses
modern technology to forge a new agrarian system.”
He acknowledges that when he started out, “the imme-
diacy of taking
life—and pigs are
very charismatic—
was difficult. But
I’ve learned that it’s
possible to love
both pigs and pork.
The heartbreak and
labor are worth it,
to participate in a
farming communi-
ty.” In fact, true sus-
tainable agriculture,
he argues, is more
than raising the
food; it also includes
“blacksmithing and
carpentry and all
the other jobs that
make a farming life -
style possible.” Plotsky wants his niche to be media, for
communicating the value of small-farm products com-
pared to cheaper, mass-produced supermarket fare. “The
key for industrial meat processing,” he says, “is low price
and high profit; for us, it’s quality. We scald and scrape
the hide, rather than skinning the pig and losing good fat
and flesh. Leaving the skin on also supports the biology
of traditional curing for prosciutto and other meat.”
Along with butchering, his company teaches curing and
sausage-making—spreading natural pork cultures into the
nearby human culture.
Food curesThe spread of food cultures is of special interest to Rangil,
both as an academic and as an expat from Argentina. “I
grew up eating seasonal food and local game and fish,”
she recalls. “On my great-grandfather’s farm, after a pig
was butchered in the winter, we kids would help with
cooking and preserving the pork.” On
sabbatical this past year, Rangil re-
searched “Latino foodscapes,” interview-
ing people who emigrated from Puebla,
Mexico, and San Juan, Puerto Rico, to
live in New York City.
While Rangil’s study subjects usually
want to cook their familiar recipes, and
many can’t afford not to cook, for nutrition consultant
Marti Wolfson ’02 a big hurdle can be convincing people to
cook. With a culinary degree from the National Gourmet
Institute and experience teaching at a holistic health and
lifestyle center, she’s a from-scratch fan. In place of eating
packaged food or take-out, “cooking does take time, but it’s
much healthier,” she says. “I also believe the act of cooking
is very healing, and cooking with your family is quality
time that’s nourish-
ing on many levels.”
Wolfson has been
pleased to see that
the Food Network
and other TV cooking
shows seem to have
revived Americans’
interest in preparing
whole, unpro cessed
food at home.
Of course, food
choices reflect not
just social influences
but basic biological
adaptation. Raveret-
Richter says, “For hu-
mans in the wild, op-
timal foraging would
draw us to sugar and
fat and meat.” For 21st-century urbanites trying to stretch
a paycheck and also honor their heritage, it might mean
beans and grains, to afford enough for everyone at the
table. In her research, Rangil has noticed “a strong sense
of duty around nourishing the family—primarily among
women, who are typically the cooks and shoppers.”
Rangil proposes that food both distinguishes cultural
BRUCIE ROSCH
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 21
identities and bridges them. Her study is charting a Latin-
ization of the US that’s “a reciprocal and transformative
trend for both the Latino and US cultures.” Cuisines—
from “authentically ethnic” to muddled to “fusion”—
help “create alternative affiliations and ‘imagined com-
munities’ that can reconfigure notions of citizenship,”
she says. She also notes that Americans’ disposable in-
comes allow them to sample foreign foods as entertain-
ment. “We like to ‘eat the other’—which can suggest a
devouring of a colonized culture, especially if we don’t try
to understand that culture a little bit through its food.”
“You are what you eat” certainly cuts more than one
way. For biologist Raveret-Richter, “We become part of
our environment by eating of it.” As a youngster, she ate
fish from Lake Michigan, before its pollution was widely
recognized. As an adult she came to realize that “when-
ever you eat a fish, you join the marine ecosystem—and
it joins you.”
Last spring Skidmore students took on the Real Food Chal-lenge, a national effort to make food served on campuses ashumane, fair-trade, ecologically safe, and local as possible. Thegoal is to make those descriptions true for 20% of campusfood by 2020. Recently well over 10% of dining-hall food has come from the
student-run organic garden next to the Colton Alumni WelcomeCenter. How is this possible? Skidmore has four things going forit: a decent growing zone, a willing dining-services director, anaggressive grass-roots Food Action Group, and Gabby Stern ’13and her compatriots.Stern spent a summer not just toiling in the student garden,
but also interning at American Farmland Trust and working withthe farmers’ market in downtown Saratoga—a locavore’s trifec-ta. “I came into Skidmore with zero experience,” says the envi-ronmental studies major. “Then I started working the garden.There I was, 18 years old, and it was the first time I’d harvesteda carrot. There is a problem with that. How had I gone my entirelife not knowing this?” Under the umbrella of the Environmental Action Club, the
Food Action Group began four years ago when students brokeground. Stern took over as manager of the garden in 2010 andcontracted with the dining hall. She says, “A few professorsgave their two cents, and we just learned on our own. We get alot of support from the ES department; they covet this garden!It has been a great part of my education.” Stern got no academic credit for that work, but Faith Nichola
’14 did an internship in data analysis for last spring’s Real FoodChallenge, providing findings to give Skidmore’s administrationa better understanding of the issue.Elizabeth Cohen ’14 grew up with a garden in her backyard, so
the origins of a carrot were familiar to her. But coming to Skid-more put organic food in a different light. “Working in the gardenmade me think about where things are coming from. Affordabilityand access aren’t the same for everybody,” she says. Riley Neu -ge bauer, Skidmore’s sustainability coordinator, also sees food asa social justice issue, arguing that “sustainability includes equityas well as ecology and economy. If people don't have access toone of their most basic needs—food—or if the only food theyhave access to is grown with pesticides that accumulate in ourbodies over time, harms the environment that we are all a part of,and doesn’t tell a story about where it came from or who grew itor why that matters, then we have a justice issue.”Margot Reisner ’14 followed her term as manager of the stu-
dent garden with a semester in Australia to study permaculture.Reisner, in the social and cultural track of the ES major, definespermaculture as “the mentality that everything we do as humanshas to do with ecology. If there is a discrepancy between theway human systems work and the way ecology works, then youare going to have a problem, such as the health problems wesee today due to what we are feeding our animals and puttinginto the air. Permaculture mimics the way ecological systemswork.” After graduation, she plans to start her own farm. “I justwant a place to have people live and be healthy,” she says.
by Mary Nelen ’79
ERIC JENKS '08
g
22 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
That inextricability is another obstacle for Wolfson’s
clients. “Food sourcing is so tough. Products made in
America may have ingredients from who knows where,
and we don’t require labeling of genetically modified
crops. You have to shop for different items at different
places to get the safest of each.” Her realistic advice is just
to buy whole foods and, when you need to buy packaged,
“check the number of ingredients: the list should be short
and they should be recognizable. I think that can be more
important than the nutrition labeling, because the US De-
partment of Agriculture ‘food pyramid’ is more about farm
subsidies and lobbying than about
sound nutrition.”
Blogger Nelen says one bright spot is
the USDA’s 2012 measure requiring
twice the previous amounts of fruits and
vegetables in the national school-lunch
program. “Getting sugar, fat, and pro -
cessed food off cafeteria menus,” she says, “could begin to
heal the damage done to a generation of students” whose
early diets have “contributed to record rates of obesity and
food allergies.” Nelen would also like to see “choices limited
to healthy food at home.”
Wolfson confirms that starting good eating habits in
youngsters is vital. She serves many clients who have
food intolerances—to wheat and dairy, primarily—but
“sugar is the number-one thing that people need to re-
duce or eliminate.
An excess affects
everything in our
bodies, and our need
for it is minuscule.”
Genetically engi-
neered crops worry
her too, since “we’re
just on the cusp of
learning how they
really affect us. The
new field of nutri -
genomics is starting
to explore how food
can influence our
genetics and those
of our offspring.”
She cites evidence
that certain genes’
expression can be turned on or off “through a clean, high-
quality diet or a diet that’s poor or contaminated by pesti-
cides, hormones, plastics, and metals.” Whatever complex
of factors is at work, Wolfson says, “There is no question
anymore that many chronic conditions today, from heart
disease to bowel disorders to cancers, are directly related to
a poor diet.”
But take the burgeoning healthier-foods market with a
grain of salt. It’s nice that restaurants are offering more
gluten-free or low-fat offerings, Wolfson concedes. Prob-
lem is, “many companies are jumping on the bandwagon
by marketing packaged foods that replace fats with sugars,
or sugars with artificial sweeteners.”
Socially engineered food?The only answer, Wolfson says, is many answers. “Take
our food back into our hands, support our local farmers,
educate our children, train our doctors, and cast our votes
every time we shop.” Rangil interjects, “We also need to
acknowledge the privilege of being able
to shop selectively and advocate for bet-
ter systems without having to worry
about putting food on our table.” The
more-produce rule for school lunches is
reportedly resulting in students’ tossing
much of it into the trash. “We can’t af-
ford to throw food away,” she says, “while we’re trying to
teach our kids how to eat.”
Wolfson concurs “the population isn’t getting any
smaller, and our food-supply expectations grow bigger
by the second.” For her, one key to the problem of “how
to feed the world but feed it with good nutrition” is to
prune back the dominance of big agro. Andrew Plotsky,
hog butcher for the world of his small circle, cites ag pol-
icy reforms too. While he respects the food safety con-
cerns behind feder-
al meat-packing
regulations, he
says, “they can
only be met by big
corporations with
administrative de-
partments to han-
dle them.” Absent
alternative rules for
small “meatsmith -
ing,” his processor
is state-certified,
not US-certified.
On rooftops too,
Lauren Mandel
would like to
rewrite some or -
dinances. While
more cities are beginning to allow small flocks of chick-
ens, bee-keeping is usually prohibited, as bees are consid-
ered a nuisance or hazard. Mandel says, “We need ways
not just to permit but to promote agriculture in residen-
tial and industrial zones.”
Economist Odekon shares the preference for small,
local, diversified farming. “Unfortunately, the distribution
of labor in global food production,” he says, “is following
BRUCIE ROSCH
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 23
the rule of comparative advantage. America and Europe,
rich in capital, are producing capital-intensive grains and
other commercial crops; developing countries, rich in labor,
are producing labor-intensive fruits and vegetables.” Conse-
quently industrial nations are increasingly dependent on
imports for their produce, while the developing world must
import its grain. Neither group can control how cleanly its
imports are farmed. “The rampant use of fertilizers and pes-
ticides in some countries is a serious health concern,” Ode -
kon says, which makes “sustainable farming, urban and
rural, more important than ever.” In his view, though,
small ag can’t develop enough without “new institutional
and legal frameworks—for example, new forms of collective
ownership for urban agricultural cooperatives.”
Cooperative arrangements also apply to meal-making.
Attending Day of the Dead celebrations in Mexico, Rangil
more than once witnessed people with small incomes lay-
ing out enormous feasts for up to 500 visitors. In the Unit-
ed States, she points out, “we more often provide charity,
giving away resources that are in excess of our needs, but
this was genuine sharing, the breaking in half of our only
piece of bread to give to someone else.” In her study com-
munities, she says, “the money for such lavish holiday
generosity sometimes comes from remittances sent home
by a family member who left to find work in the States,
perhaps even in agriculture.”
Such foodways serve as familiar cultural resources that
can mean a lot to immigrants. As Rangil says, taste is a
feeling, and in fact smell and taste are often the strongest
senses for triggering memory and other associations, so
“food is about the past and present, the bodily and the
symbolic.” Curating its traditions, cultivating it, and shar-
ing it “can bring people closer together and help us under-
stand each other.”
BRUCIE ROSCH
Rekindle old friendships • Rediscover Saratoga SpringsReconnect with faculty • Join the parade • Picnic on the green
Go back to class • Visit the alumni art exhibitionEnjoy live music and fireworks
To register and get details, visit www.skidmore.edu/reunion
May 30–June 2
It’s not too late to take part.
2008 • 2003 • 1998 • 1993 • 1988 • 1983 • 1978 • 1973 • 1968 • 1963 • 1958 • 1953 • 1948 • 1943 •
2008 • 2003 • 1998 • 1993 • 1988 • 1983 • 1978 • 1973 • 1968 • 1963 • 1958 • 1953 • 1948 • 1943 •
1938 • 1933 • 1928 • 1923 • 2008 • 20
03 • 1998 • 1993 • 1988 • 1983 • 1978 • 1973 • 1968 • 1963 • 1958 • 1953 • 1948•
2003 • 1998 • 1993 • 1988 • 1983 • 1978 • 1973 • 1968 • 1963 • 1958 • 1953 • 1948 • 1943 • 1938 • 1933 • 1928 • 1923 •
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 25
If Jennifer Daniels ’94 is having a
stressful day at work, she goes to see the
caracal, a beautiful, black-eared desert
cat that usually prowls in Africa and
Asia. Or if she is jittery from fighting
traffic around her office in Washington,
D.C., she visits with the elephants,
which she finds calming, especially
when they’re being bathed.
These are some of the quirky perks
that Daniels gets to enjoy as the land-
scape architect at the Smithsonian’s
National Zoological Park, the 163-acre
home to animals ranging from the icon-
ic giant pandas to birds, monkeys and
apes, amphibians and reptiles, and even
insects. “I never expected this to be my
career, but it’s pretty exciting to touch a
65-year-old elephant,” she admits.
After her anthropology major at Skid-
more—she was drawn initially to the
dance program, but ultimately chose an
academic discipline over the performing
arts—Daniels’s first job was as a facilitator
moderating dialogues on race relations,
especially between blacks and whites in
New Haven, Conn., where churches,
community groups, and government
agencies were seeking such interactions.
She had gained the skills when an an-
thropology professor, Jill Sweet, intro-
duced her to leadership training through
Futures for Children, which encourages
American Indian students to graduate
from high school, pursue postsecondary
education, and give back to their com-
munities through public service.
Daniels also studied with George
Lakey’s program Training for Change,
specializing in “activist training that
helps groups stand up more effectively
for justice, peace, and the environment,”
working with youngsters who had expe-
rienced violence. She says, “It shaped
who I am,” and she
adds, “These conflict-
resolution techniques
could be relevant in
Los Angeles, Ireland,
or Israel.” In fact, she
took them to Russia, where she and hus-
band Rick Fox lived for six years. She
learned the language and conducted dia-
logues from Siberia to Moscow, helping
people navigate the volatile interperson-
al dynamics of alcoholism, unemploy-
ment, and social isolation.
Back in the US, Daniels had to decide
what to do next. What she cared about
most was people, and how they use their
spaces, so she enrolled at the University
of Pennsylvania for a master’s degree in
landscape architecture. She explains,
“Landscape architecture was, for me, not
about plants. It was about people in an
environment—how to make that work.”
As a dancer and anthropologist, “I was
ready to translate those interests into fig-
uring something out about human be-
ings and how they occupy their space.”
Next, in Jackson Hole, Wyo., Fox
worked for the US Forest Service and
Daniels worked for a landscape architec-
ture firm on projects such as the design
and construction of bridges and exhibits
in Grand Teton National Park’s Rocke-
feller Preserve. A promotion for Fox
brought them, with their three children,
back east to Washington, D.C.
Daniels became the first resident
landscape architect at the National Zoo
since its creation in 1889 by Frederick
Law Olmstead (who also designed New
York City’s Central Park and other fa-
mous sites—including Saratoga’s Con-
gress Park). She had a steep learning
curve, she admits, but notes that her
background helped her build relation-
ships, understand politics, and embrace
challenge and problem-solving.
Planning for animals as well as people
was new to her, and she loves it. She has
to think about topography and nutrition,
efficiency and beauty, and what makes
spaces safe, user-
friendly, com pliant
with regulations, and
fun. For a carousel, “I
got to pick the ani-
mals for the seats and
plan how to section them according to
which lived in wetlands, deserts, oceans...
I still smile every time I think about it.”
Also exhilarating is advocating for the
zoo and its public support. Addressing
“everything from conservation to rev-
enue, I’ve become more of a strategic
planner in the process.”
Off the job, she spends time with her
kids. “And what dohey want to do?” she
asks with a sigh. “They say, ‘Mom, can we
go to the zoo?’” —Helen S. Edelman ’74
Shaping interpersonal—and interspecies—dynamics
JEN DANIELS ’94 DESIGNS SPACES FOR ZOO VISITORS AND RESIDENTS.
“LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREWAS, FOR ME, NOT ABOUTPLANTS. IT WAS ABOUT
PEOPLE IN AN ENVIRONMENT—HOW TO MAKE THAT WORK.”
HILARY SCHWAB
CREATIVE THOUGHT AT WORK
26 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
CREATIVE THOUGHT AT WORK
“They pull the oars in and finish at
their chins, but they’re out there,” says
Bob Tarrant ’78, co-founder of the
Saratoga Rowing Center. “We run
sculling camps for 8- to 12-year-old
kids—summer programs, after-school
programs.” Tarrant continues, “At the
novice level, kids that are 8 years old are
easier to teach than novices that are 50.
Adults have to kick the door to learning
back open. But little kids, by and large,
are fearless. If you put a 9-year-old in a
racing single on the third day of camp,
she’ll flip and not care. She’ll figure out
what she did wrong and not flip again.”
Neither Tarrant nor wife Jean Tierney
Tarrant ’79—known by many as Bean, he
says—rowed at Skidmore, as the college
had no varsity crew in their student days.
They started Saratoga
Rowing Center in
2003, after he decid-
ed to leave his fami-
ly’s manufacturing
business.
He says, “We’ve
had some cool successes with a couple of
rowers who started at 8 or 9 and went on
to the competitive rowing program” at
Saratoga Rowing Association, a partner
to the Tarrants’ rowing center. “It’s fun
to watch them head off to row for Har-
vard or Brown.” Started
in 1996, SRA has grown
into a vibrant hub of
rowing in what its head
coach Chris Chase calls a
“rowing-crazy town. One
in 12 kids in the high
school here in Saratoga
Springs is a rower.”
Chase explains that
the Tarrants’ sculling
program for youngsters
makes his team stronger.
He says, “Bob and Bean
were both scullers. They
taught their three daugh-
ters to scull. And doing
the program for 8- to
12-year-olds was a niche
they wanted to fill.”
Chase has 177 kids on
the SRA team, “and
every kid can row a sin-
gle. They come to us al-
ready knowing how to
handle the boats.” When
asked if he knows of
other learn-to-row pro-
grams that teach elemen-
tary school kids, Tarrant
replies, “I haven’t heard
of any in the United
States.” That’s partly
why he adds, “Bean and
I feel sculling in this
country could use a boost.” Sounds like
he and his wife are doing that, but he
counters, “It’s the kids that are doing it.
They’re the stars.”
Chase jumps in with a
thought about Tarrant’s
style. “Don’t let him
fool you. He’s incredibly
detail-oriented and
methodical, as a coach
should be. He’s stern with the kids, but
a lot of fun.”
Tarrant’s program is usually full. He
says, “Mostly we operate from waiting
lists. Mom and Dad want to give their
kids a taste of rowing.” But it’s not easy:
“Listen, putting a 9-year-old in a boat,
with the equipment sizes we have, it’s
demanding on them. I don’t let them
graduate to the next level until they can
steer a single and navigate on a small
river that may have 40 shells out during
a varsity practice. It’s sometimes a lot to
ask, but it’s important. We keep our
camps small, no more than 10 kids with
three coaches, because you can’t mess
around with kids on the water. But
they’re learning so much out there.”
Tarrant smiles as he talks. “These kids
are amazing. They’re learning to scull in
equipment that’s oversized for them,
which means they have to learn how to
handle it. It would be like asking you to
scull with sweep oars. You’d end up with
a lot of control as a rower.”
Both coaches say they are operating
at maximum capacity. “During practice
we have 25 singles, 20 pairs, seven
coxed quads, plus 10 boats with Bob’s
kids in them,” says Chase. “We run two
practice times a day. It’s the only way it
can happen.”
Is “it” getting all the kids on the water
or getting all the kids to become great
rowers? Either way, in Saratoga Springs,
with the Tarrants as youth coaches, row-
ing starts early in life.
Adapted with permission from “Ahead of
the Curve,” by Jen Whiting, in the Novem-
ber 2012 Rowing magazine.
pulling for local kids
BOB ’78 AND JEAN TIERNEY TARRANT ’79 PREP FORCOACHING DUTIES AT THEIR SARATOGA ROWING CENTER.
“PUTTING A 9-YEAR-OLD IN A BOAT, WITH THE
EQUIPMENT SIZES WE HAVE,IT’S DEMANDING ON THEM.BUT THEY’RE LEARNING SO MUCH OUT THERE.”
GARY GOLD
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 27
A Skidmore double and four both
finished in the top 10 at October’s Head
of the Fish Regatta (which also drew more
than 30 alumni, including competitors in
mixed eight and other races). Last spring
a Thoroughbreds four came in second,
just behind a West Point boat, at the state
championships. This spring 43 students
were rowing hard.
As the crew program has grown and
thrived over the decades, outstripping the
capacity of its old boathouse, the pace is
picking up in the fundraising for a new
facility. Designed by architect and Skid-
more Hall of Famer John Onderdonk ’89,
launched with a lead gift of $750,000
from Margaret and Michael Valentine
(parents of former T’bred Martha ’09),
and supported by other crew alumni and
friends, the new boathouse plan has
raised $1.1 million so far. Now the
Valentine family has pledged to match
all gifts of any size, up to $250,000. The
$500,000 from a successful challenge
would bring the
construction fund
up to $1.5 mil-
lion, enough for
the $2.3 million
project to break
ground.
The Valentine
Boathouse will in-
clude large stor-
age bays, a train-
ing room, full
locker rooms, a
spectators’ deck,
and more. Spaces are still available to be
named with major gifts, and young
alumni can name an “oar of honor” for
a five-year pledge of just $5,000. Already
Luke Huber ’85 has named the viewing
deck, Ron Levene ’86 has funded the ter-
race between the main boathouse and
the sculling pavilion, Chip Babcock (hus-
band of Nancy Hamilton ’77) has funded
a boat bay and the waterfront park, and
Neil Kaye ’81 (recalling the spartan con-
ditions back when he was starting crew
as a club sport?) has named a locker
room. Levene is also coxing the challenge
effort among fellow crew fans, with sights
set on that $250,000 match.
For more, go to skidmoreathletics.com
and click “crew,” or send an e-mail to
[email protected]. —SR
How to float a boathouse
AN EARLY-MORNING THOROUGHBREDS WORKOUT ON FISH CREEK
BOB EWELL
Putting a string around my finger wasn’t exactly an option.
y finger wmutting a string arP
tly xact e’asny finger woundutting a string ar
an option.
he Alumni Division on T
June 11-16 & 19-23, 2013oga Classic Horse ShotaSar
ollege e CidmorSk
te these davsaer it takevthaW
he Alumni Division on
June 11-16 & 19-23, 2013: woga Classic Horse Sho
ollege
es:o emember t, reser it tak
idmorsclassic@sk
518-580-5632 or 518-580-5633.edu/sareidmor.skwww
daturSahe Alumni Division on T
.edueidmor
518-580-5632 or 518-580-5633ogaclassicta.edu/sar
, June 22, 2013he Alumni Division on
JOIN US FOR A WEEKEND OF FAMILY, FRIENDS,AND CELEBRATION OF THE SKIDMORE COMMUNITY
oct 18–20 President’s Hour
Minicollege presentations
Exhibitions at the Tang Teaching Museumand Art Gallery
Thoroughbred athletic contests
Under the Big Top with talented student performers
registration and schedules:skidmore.edu/celebrationweekend,
[email protected], or 518-580-5670lodging and dining information:saratoga.org or 518-584-3255
Putting a string aroundmy finger wasn’t exactlyan option.
Whatever it takes, remember to save these dates:
Skidmore CollegeSaratoga Classic Horse ShowJune 11–16 & 19–23
Join us for the Alumni Divisionon Saturday, June 22
www.skidmore.edu/saratogaclassic518-580-5632 or [email protected]
Skidmore’s Parnassus Society, hon-
oring donors of more than $1 million,
now has nearly 100 members, after 14
were inducted last December. The in-
ductees’ combined $19 million in gifts to
Skidmore have provided “critical support
for projects ranging from the annual fund
and scholarships to the Tang Museum
and Valentine Boathouse,” remarked
President Philip Glotzbach. He went on,
“These individuals have not let us settle,
but have encouraged us to make Skid-
more a place where creative thought is
truly made material, and for that we are
deeply grateful.”
The new members are:
Frank and Barbara Underhill Coll -
yer ’52. Barbara was an educator at Cor-
nell, Brown, and the University of Texas.
In support of Skidmore crew, she donated
a shell that was dubbed B-52 in her
honor. She also established the Barbara
Underhill Collyer ’52 Scholarship and
recently endowed the position of vice
president for advancement.
Shelby and Gale Davis of the Davis
United World College Scholars Program.
Since Skidmore joined the Davis UWC
network in 2004, some 70 students
from 39 countries have attended Skid-
more with support from the program,
the world’s largest privately funded in-
ternational scholarship program for
undergraduates.
Jerome and Emily Farnsworth ’59.
Emily was a high-school teacher and li-
brarian. She and her husband have been
dedicated supporters of higher educa-
tion, both at Skidmore and at his alma
mater, Trinity.
Irving and Selma Harris, P ’76, ’79.
Parents of Jonathan ’76 and Lisa ’79, the
Harrises have supported the Palamoun-
tain Scholarships and the Parents Fund.
After Jonathan’s untimely death, they
endowed a scholarship and named a
reading room in the Lucy Scribner Li-
brary in his memory; they later named
the library’s Harris Lobby as well.
Paul and Barbara McGrew Jenkel
’62, P ’91. Parents of Cyndi ’91, the
Jenkels contributed to the Thomas
Endowed Fund for the Arthur Zankel
Music Center in honor of Barbara’s
friend Suzanne Corbet Thomas ’62. Bar-
bara has helped run Educated Canines
Assisting with Disabilities, located at the
Children’s Village, a treatment center for
at-risk children.
Richard and Jean “Hadley” Sillick
Robertson ’60. A prolific and longtime
designer with Recycled Paper Greetings,
Hadley has supported, along with her
husband, a range of Skidmore causes
from the annual fund to the Tang Mu -
seum to financial aid, for which they
established the Richard and Hadley Sil-
lick Robertson ’60 Scholarship.
Michael and Margaret Valentine,
P ’09. Parents of Martha ’09, who great-
ly enjoyed being part of Skidmore crew,
the Valentines gave a lead gift for the
project now known as the Valentine
Boathouse. And they recently pledged a
matching-gift challenge to inspire fur-
ther support for the project. —DF, SR
Reaching parnassus
Mix and match: In March, threedozen students of color made careerconnections with alumni of color, atSkidmore’s first-ever MulticulturalSpeed-Networking Reception. Theevent drew more than 40 alumni,from the classes of 1989 to 2012,employed by a range of firms fromMor gan Stanley to Urban Arts Part-nership to Aetna Insurance. WendyWilson ’96 was impressed by “sucha diverse group of students, all veryfocused and prepared.” Studentswere given five minutes with eachalum in the room, to introducethemselves, ask questions, and net-work on professional topics; thenthey had a chance to follow up withalumni of special interest. Josin Lin’09 enjoyed the “speed dating” for-mat: “I like that we were able to ro-tate and speak with each studentabout our experiences after Skid-more. I think we should continue tohost these events in the future, sothat students will connect withmore alumni.” —Daniella Nordin
CLUB CONNECTION:NEW YORK CITY
8
CHARLIE SAMUELS
TODD FRANCE ’89
A PRESIDENTIAL TOASTTO PARNASSUS MEMBERS
S P R I N G 2 0 1 3 SCOPE 29
It’s a January evening in a midtown Man-hattan high-rise, where dozens of Skid-more volunteers, alumni job seekers andchangers, and students nearing gradua-tion are networking like crazy. The energyis high, the vibe is good, and the conver-sations are flowing. Everyone’s followingthe advice of Adam Wald ’94 to “meet atleast three people and e-mail each ofthem the next day.” They’ve been re-minded that networking is the best way,bar none, to land a job.Jenna Hartwell, the Career Develop-
ment Center’s associate director foralumni career development, kicked offthis “Evening of Career Transition andTransformation” with a workshop, “TheRoad Not (yet) Taken,” featuring small-group brainstorming and a roadmap foralumni considering career changes. Inits second year (and sold out well in ad-vance), the event is a direct outgrowthof Skidmore’s commitment to provide“free career counseling to alumni forlife,” as Hartwell puts it. “How cool isthat?” she asks. “At most colleges youhave to pay for it, or you get two ses-
sions and you’re done.” Hartwell teamed with
Wald, president of Skid-more’s New York City cluband an alumni board mem-ber, and with Mike Sposili,director of alumni affairsand college events, to setthe context for the eve -ning. Then it got underway, as 43 alumni volun-teers (and some Skidmoreparents and staff) from 13career fields made them-selves available for face-to-face networking for almost two hours.Wald, a voiceover actor who also pro-vides career advice to artists, made asimple suggestion: “Write a little elevatorspeech for yourself—your own personalstory. In job interviews you’re oftengoing to hear, ‘Tell me about yourself.’So be ready!”Among the buzz of conversations and
connections (video highlights are atyoutu.be/8JJ0r7joyoE), education pub-lisher and Skidmore Parents Council
member David Behrman, P ’13, chattedwith freelance writer Michele Herman’79 about potential work at his BehrmanHouse Inc. Nearby, volunteer David Har-rison ’87, business analyst and senior VPat Citigroup, was delighted to reconnectwith Enrique Tiburcio ’06, who as a stu-dent had job-shadowed with Harrison.“Enrique is doing extremely well for him-self now,” says Harrison proudly. “He’sa VP at JP Morgan. And he talked withstudents last November at Skidmore’s‘Wall Street 101’ panel.”All in all, Hartwell says, the evening
exceeded her expectations. “I wish Icould adequately convey the level ofengagement—and noise—in the room!It was wonderful to observe so manythoughtful conversations, words of en-couragement, and inspirational ideas.” Hartwell underscores that this is just
one way that Skidmore serves alumni onevery step of career journeys that mayspan their lifetimes. “An instructor ofmine once told me that building a careeris like building a home: you start with avision, but eventually you redecorate,tack on an addition, or knock down awall. In that metaphor, your college ex-perience is your front door. I want ouralumni to know that, no matter wherethey go, what they do, or how much theyaccomplish, their front door is and al-ways will be Skidmore. The time theyspent here is the point of entry to theirprofessional lives.” —MM, PM
CAREER CORNER: Alumni event makes a buzz
PETER MACDONALD
Now’s the time to join your classmatesfor a weekend at Skidmore,to plan your next bigget-together.
SECTION I July 25–27, 2013,Thursday–Saturday (for classes 1954,
1959, 1964, 1969, & 1974)
SECTION II July 26–28, 2013, Friday–Sunday (for classes 1979, 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, & 2009)
For more information call 800-584-0115. Reunion 2014 is May 29–June 1. Save the date!
It’s right around the bend…
ReunionPlanning Weekend:
REUNION 2014
ENRIQUE TIBURCIO ’06 (AT RIGHT) DIVES INTO CAREERNETWORKING AT THE NEW YORK CITY EVENT.
Early Sketchies? Lynn Lavorgna McCrea ’66 still recognizes
some of the players, though the show took place before her
time. She says, “The person on the far left, I believe, is Eliza-
beth Ferguson, who was one of my dear sociology professors.
I kept in touch with her for many, many years before she died
a couple of years ago.” McCrea also spots Dean Norma MacRury,
“sixth from the left.” And she guesses that the shorter woman
next to her was a professor
of music, “but I have lost
her name in the recesses of
my memory!”
MacRury, dean of the
college from 1949 to 1970,
is indeed the white-haired
cast member in the middle,
but her shorter neighbor is
actually Edith Stone quist,
wife of sociology professor
Everett Stonequist. Up in
front of them is the chap-
lain, Edgar Sather, in un-
convincing drag. McCrea is
also correct about the per-
son at the far left: social-work professor Tish Ferguson (behind
the stage-struck English setter). To her left is Russian and Ro-
mance-language professor Rudy Sturm (in glasses and necktie)
and art professor Alice Moshier (in heroic armor).
What were they playing at? According to Skidmore’s history
Make No Small Plans, it was sketch comedy—a popular way to
raise funds for student aid, special events, community pro-
grams, and other causes in
Skidmore’s early days. In
1937 “Faculty Flickers for
the Foundlings” was a ben-
efit for freshmen who had
lost their belongings to a
fire in the South Hall
dorm. The performance
pictured here, in May
1959, portrayed life at the
myth ical Breedlove College
and featured parodies of
Wagnerian opera with
Moshier and government
professor Henry Galant as
Teutonic warriors.—SR
FROM LAST TIME
MORTICIANS? Who are these students, where, and what’s on the shelves? Tell us your answers at518-580-5747, [email protected], or Scope c/oSkidmore College. We’ll report answers, and run anew quiz, in the upcoming Scope magazine.
WHO, WHAT, WHEN
30 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
PHIL HAGGERTY
THE KAYAK SHAK, ON FISH CREEK AT THE OUTLET OF SARATOGA LAKE, IS A POPULAR LOCAL VENUE FOR WATER SPORTS.
PLYING SARATOGA’S WATERS
Water is the word in Saratoga Springs, of course, but not
just for drinking or bathing. The area is also brimming with
liquid sports and recreation.
Saratoga Lake, just east of the city, is a busy attraction for
fishing, boating, water-skiing, and sailboat racing. Anglers
with their own craft can put in at the New York State Boat
Launch on Route 9P and try landing a bass, northern pike, or
walleye. For advice, lures, and bait, stop in at Saratoga Tackle
and Archery, and for motivation, hook onto the lake associa-
tion’s guide to fish species and record catches.
Need a boat, or just fuel or supplies? Point Breeze Marina
rents and sells a range of boats and has dock space. At South
Shore Marina, at DiDonna’s Restaurant, you can rent dock
space, buy a seasonal boat-launch pass, and even rent a vaca-
tion property. Fish Creek Marina, on County Route 67 at the
lake’s outlet near Skidmore’s boathouse, also has the lively
Kayak Shak, where it seems a party is always about to break
out. It offers half- and full-day rentals of kayaks, canoes, row-
boats, and stand-up paddleboards. If you have your own non-
motorized craft, you can park and launch at the city’s new
Waterfront Park off Crescent Avenue.
Need lessons? You can get instruction at the Saratoga Sail-
ing Club—or just enjoy the beautiful boats in its regattas.
Likewise for rowing, in late spring and early fall you can
watch the Skidmore crew pulling hard along the lake and
creek, or you can sign up for the Saratoga Rowing Associa-
tion’s instructional camps, lessons, and competitions—two
highlights are the Saratoga Invitational in April and the leg-
endary Head of the Fish Regatta (always an alumni favorite)
in October.
For swimming, Saratoga Spa State Park is home to two pub-
lic pools. The large Peerless Pool Complex is family-friendly,
with a separate slide area and wading pool. The Victoria Pool
is smaller, historic, and tucked into arched promenades for a
more elegant vibe. It features an outdoor bar, but be there
when it opens to have any hope of scoring a lounge chair.
Those looking for more thrills with their chills can head
north to Lake George for parasailing or to Hadley for high-
adrenaline rafting or tubing that the Sacandaga Outdoor Cen-
ter promises is “one of the best buzzes mother nature can dish
out.” Its equipment includes water cannons and buckets to
ensure that your every molecule gets doused.
On the other end of the drama and decibel scales, there
are abundant options for peaceful paddling, from leafy Lake
Lonely to Lake Moreau just north of town. For suggestions,
along with thoughtful commentary and gorgeous photogra-
phy, check out Saratoga Woods and Waterways, the blog of for-
mer Scope editor Jackie Donnelly, whose wanderings always
include “looking closely, listening carefully.” Her favorite
paddle? “It’s the Hudson River between the Spier Falls and
Sherman Island dams, accessed by a boat launch on Spier
Falls Road in Moreau,” she says.
After bumping over rapids in a whitewater adventure or
paddling across a scenic lake, you may just be ready for the
other Saratoga H20: a tall quaff of, or a long soak in, the fa-
mous fizzy waters. —KG
BEAU STALLARD
SARATOGA SIDEBAR
64 SCOPE S P R I N G 2 0 1 3
Skidmore College, Annual Fund | 815 North Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 800-584-0115
www.skidmore.edu/annual_fund.
matter:/’maete(r)/ v. be of importance; have significance. (Oxford English Dictionary)
Skidmore is a College on the MOVE
You can play a critical role in the energy that is Skidmore College.
Make your gift to the Skidmore Annual Fund, and say more than
just “thank you” for the life-changing experience you had. Tell us
“Skidmore matters today,” and it matters to you and to the next
generation of students who will make their own impact on the world!
BE A PART OF IT!