Scirrhus of the Breast
-
Upload
clement-hawkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Scirrhus of the Breast
![Page 1: Scirrhus of the Breast](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022092621/57509e841a28abbf6b118982/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BMJ
Scirrhus of the BreastAuthor(s): Clement HawkinsSource: Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal (1844-1852), Vol. 13, No. 23 (Nov. 14, 1849), pp.642-643Published by: BMJStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25501039 .
Accessed: 12/06/2014 23:08
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
BMJ is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Provincial Medical and SurgicalJournal (1844-1852).
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.174 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:08:43 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 2: Scirrhus of the Breast](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022092621/57509e841a28abbf6b118982/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
642 SCIRRHUS OF THE BREAST.
brought, and slid out of court with a non-suit against
me, on the legal informality he had himself committed.
Your readers may see the case ably treated in the
last number of the Medical Gazette. There is also a
detailed account in the Medical Times; either will be a
sufficient antidote to the wilful, and, may I say, malig nant perversion of the truth, which the Lancet has
adopted. Obstinate as this journal has represented me
to be as a "contumacious witness," and wrong in
treatment, or unprincipled in some secret remedy as
the coroner affected to suspect me of being, the whole
of that treatment was publicly and cheerfully recorded
by me at the General Board of Health, near forty-eight hours before the inquest was held.
It may suffice that I have thus drawn attention to
the subject, and protested against the garbled statement
and unworthy imputations of the Lancet and its Coroner
Editor. Consolitary is the recollection, that the Presi
dent of the Association, Dr. Hastings, declared lately at Worcester, that the great objects of the said Society
were the cultivation of the social sentiments, and the
degradation of all that is sordid. I may have erred in
a matter of law touching a coroner's power to force a
physician or surgeon to state his treatment to gratify the idle vagary or love of power in coroner or jury. I certainly did err in considering a deputy coroner
would be bound by his word, attested by credible wit
nesses, or I should not have commenced an action which
I knew was liable to a non-suit on defective legal
formality. Let all this pass. Our members in the provinces
may have less cause for vigilance than those in Middlesex, who are threatened with Newgate under alleged con
tumacy. You, Sir, and the members of the Provincial
Association, will, I am sure, let the public interest be
protected in every becoming way, and cause class
interest to be subservient to the general good of society. You will lend your influence to make the coroner's
powers to be clearly ascertained-if needful, revised
also, and clearly defined, and then by all of us let them
be rigorously obeyed. The medical profession, in every relation of life,
should be as ready to succour suffering humanity, and
assist the cause of weakened justice, as to resent
aggressions upon their own social feelings, lawful rights, and sense of honour, come these indignities from private
individuals, from congregated bodies, or coroners. " Fiat justitia ruat cltum."
I have the honour to be, Mr. Editor, Your very obedient servant,
CHARLES F. J. LORD.
Hampstead, October 26, 1849.
FUNGOID GROWTHS IN CHOLERA.
To the Editor of the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal.
SIR,-My attention has been attracted by Dr.
Branson's hypothesis to account for the presence of
fungoid growths in cholera evacuations. I am not
about to enter upon any consideration of the generIa
subject, which I think likely to be set at rest by the
investigations of my friends Drs. Baly, Gull, Jenner,
and Mr. Marshall; I merely wish to make a remark
on the existence of torulce in saccharine fluids con
firmatory of the quotations in Dr. Branson's letter.
It has been said that the smallest quantity of sugar in
urine is sufficient to determine the growth of torulae, but I doubt if this statement is generally appreciated at its full value. Torulae may occur abundantly in
urine when sugar cannot be detected by Trommer's
test-that which I have been in the habit of employing at the bedside. I do not say that it is absent in these
instances, because it is in oxalic urine that I have
mostly observed this fact, but it is well worthy of being
kept in mind that it may be so minute in amount, that
it may escape observation, owing merely to the fallacies
to which the extemporaneous search for it in a nitro
genous fluid is exposed. This may serve as a hint to
inquirers, that they must not rest satisfied as to the
absence of sugar in choleraic evacuations where torulae
may be found, until a more delicate analysis has been
made. I have found them in urine where not only was the quantity of sugar so trifling as to leave no
influence upon the specific gravity of the liquid, but
principally where the density was actually lower than the customary healthy standard. (See a paper by
myself, on " Oxalic Urine," in the Provincial Medical
and Surgical Journal for September 8th, 1847.) I remain, Sir,
Your obedient servant, EDWARD BALLARD, M.D.
East Retford, November 6, 1849.
P.S. I may add, now that I am upon the subject of
vegetable growths, that I have five times met with
globular bodies in the urine which I have not seen
elsewhere described: twice in a case of chronic rheu
matism, and three times in a case of eczema of the
scalp. They varied in size from that of a mucous
corpuscle, and smaller, to four times that size; the
smaller ones had a smooth outline, and were distinctly
granular internally; the larger were dark brown, and
not only contained granular matter, but were irregularly covered by granular elevations, more or less minute, over their surface. Some I have seen burst. In one
instance I saw two or three small ones attached in a
row to one of the large bodies. In both of the above
cases oxalate of lime occurred in the urine, and I have
never seen them where this salt was absent. In four
out of the five observations the urine presented an
excess of phosphates, and in three of these there were
prisms of triple phosphate visible in more or less
abundance. In only one out of the five did the urine
exhibit normal acidity, and in two it was alkaline to
test paper.
SCIRRHUS OF THE BREAST.
To the Editor of the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal.
SIR,-May I beg the favour of your inserting the
following questions in the Provincial Medical and
Surgical Journal, in the hope of eliciting a reply from some practical and experienced surgeons (members
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.174 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:08:43 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 3: Scirrhus of the Breast](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022092621/57509e841a28abbf6b118982/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE. 643
of our Association,) on a point of vital importance and
interest to society. I have endeavoured to inform
myself on the subject of scirrhus of the female breast
by reading the published writings of many of our dis
tinguished countrymen, and I regret to say I have been
dissatisfied with the result of my reading, and have
been unable to form any definite opinion, for in many
respects there is a wide difference of opinion on the
nature, as well as of the treatment, of this "cruel
scourge of humanity." I have taken every opportunity of asking many
surgeons of experience (some who have retired from
practice) what has been the result of their operations for scirrhus of the mammary gland. The answer I have
almost invariably received has been,-the less you inter
fere the better. During the last few years I have been
made acquainted with cases in which both eminent
London and provincial surgeons have been consulted,
and the opinions given the anxious patient and her
friends have been discordant indeed. In more than
one instance, under the advice of "great men," the
whole gland has been extirpated, when, to all appear
ances, the operation promised success; yet the result
has been far different; the wound has nearly healed,
but instead of cicatrizing, the edges have become dark
and shining, and carcinomatous ulceration and miserable
death has ensued.
The question has arisen in my mind, was not the
fatal termination hastened by the operation. We know
that a scirrhus tumour of the female breast, if left to
itself, usually ulcerates, and the patient dies from its
effects. Every surgeon who witnesses the progress and ter
mination of these cases would gladly avail himself of
a doubtful remedy, in the hope of being instrumental
in arresting this state of things. The only remedy we
have is the knife, and of the propriety of operating I
am desirous of being made acquainted; and I hope the members of the Provincial Association, who have
leisure, will give me their opinions through the medium of the Journal. I will not trespass longer on your
patience. I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
CLEMENT HAWKINS.
Cheltenham, November 5, 1849.
Questions. 1. Is scirrhus of the female breast ever a local
disease ?
2. Is the removal of it by the knife advisable when it is in an indolent state ?
3. When the operation has been performed under such circumstances, has the disease been observed to take on a more active form, and proceed more rapidly to a fatal termination ?
N.B.-Any other practical information on this subject.
MEDICAL BENEVOLENT FUND.
To the Editor of the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal.
MR. EDITOR,-Will you allow me to suggest t6 each
one of your readers, that the day appointed for public
thanksgiving,-viz., next Thursday, would be a pecu
liarly favourable opportunity for contributing a special
thank-offering to Almighty God, in the shape of a
donation to the Medical Benevolent Fund, as a token
of grateful acknowledgement of that mercy which has
protected himself and his family from the destroying
pestilence, from the effects of which several have become
claimants upon our fund, and many more are suffering from the direst calamity ?
A small sum from each would amount to a consider
able aggregate, and might be appropriated to the relief
of sufferers from cholera.
I am, Mr. Editor, faithfully yours, WILLIAM NEWNHAM.
Secretary. Farnham, Nov. 9, 1849.
...Acalt- .ntt.lignt. THE CHOLERA SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE
COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, ON THE CHO
LERA FUNGI.
The following are the principal conclusions and
results arrived at by this committee on the nature and
import of certain bodies examined microscopically in
relation to cholera:
" 1. Bodies presenting the characteristic forms of
the so-called cholera fungi are not to be detected in the
air, and, as far as our experiments have gone, not in the
drinking-water of infected places. "2. It is established that, under the term 'annular
bodies' and ' cholera cells, or fungi,' there have been
confounded many objects of various and totally distinct
natures.
"3. A large number of these have been traced to
substances taken as food or medicine.
"4. The origin of others is still doubtful, but these
are clearly not fungi. "5. All the more remarkable forms are to be de
tected in the intestinal evacuations of persons labouring under diseases totally different in their nature from
cholera.
" Lastly. We draw from these premises the general conclusion that the bodies found and described by
Iessrs. Brittan and Swayne are not the cause of
cholera, and have no exclusive connexion with that
disease; or in other words, that the whole theory of
the disease which has recently been propounded, is
erroneous, as far as it is based on the existence of the
bodies in question. WILLIAM BALY, M.D. Cholera Sub WILLIAM W. GULL, M.D. Committee.
QUALIFICATION OF MEDICAL OFFICERS FOR PAROCHIAL APPOINTMENTS.
An interesting discussion took place in the St.
Pancras vestry, on the appointment of a medical officer
for one of the districts of that extensive parish. The
directors of the poor having advertised for a medical
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.174 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:08:43 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions