Science, Technology And Society
-
Upload
patience-leblanc -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Science, Technology And Society
Science, Technology And Society
What astronomy teaches us.
When scientific discovery, conjecture or theory challenges belief, there will be conflict.
A classic example occurred during the middle ages
The controversy was whether or not the earth was the center of the universe.
Two models:
Ptolemaic/geocentric
Copernican/heliocentric
Geocentric—earth at center
Makes sense—it does appear that objects orbit the earth.
The geocentric model is usually attributed to
(Claudius) Ptolemy
AD 90 -- AD 168
In order for everything to orbit the EARTH, theorists needed to
be able to explainRETROGRADE MOTION.
Retrograde Motion
Some planets appear to move BACKWARDS in their orbits at times.
Retrograde Motion of Mars
http://www.lasalle.edu/~smithsc/Astronomy/retrograd.html
Ptolemy suggested that this occurred due to “epicycles”– within their orbits,
the planets had smaller orbits.
To explain the backward motions,
Each planet moved around a smaller circle as it orbited the earth.
On the other hand, if the earth is orbiting the sun
along with the other planets, it makes sense that faster, inner planets would approach, pass, and move away from slower, outer planets.
The IDEA of a sun-centered universe
Is usually credited to Aristarchus of Samos, third century BC
(310BC-230BC)
A Polish doctor, lawyer and amateur astronomer.
The first formal heliocentric model is attributed to Nikolas
Copernicus, 1473-1543
Copernicus
Thought the retrograde motion of the planets could be explained just as easily if ALL planets orbited the SUN.
Copernicus:
still used epicycles in his model
waited until near his death to publish his ideas, which received little attention for nearly 100 years.
WHY? Was the earth-centered universe accepted for almost
1400 years?The Copernican model really didn’t
describe planetary motion any better than the Ptolemaic.
There is no physical sensation of the earth orbiting.
No parallax shift
Most importantly:
1. The historical context was not one which encouraged scientific discussion. -Literacy was low.-Practically no travel, communication, written texts
2. The growing influence of the holy roman church.
The church was the dominant intellectual and political force in Europe.
The church much preferred the Aristotle/Ptolemy model.
Man, God’s great creation,
Would be at the center of all
Everything else
In the universe would be created for man, and his divine home, the earth.
So, the sun
Existed to warm the home of man.
Furthermore,
The emphasis on circular orbits and epicycles was good—the circle is a “perfect” shape, and God’s creations were perfect.
In 1517, the protestant movement began in Germany.
Martin Luther, the leader of the movement, spoke out in favor of heliocentrism.
As a result,
The Catholic church actually expressed some interest in Copernicus’ book, even though it contradicted church doctrine.
Those who spoke against church doctrine
Were labeled ‘heretics.”The could be kicked out of the church, identified as outlaws, imprisoned or put to death.
Giordano Bruno
1548-1600
Burned at stake for heresy
Bruno’s heresy:
The sun was just another star, and there were probably people elsewhere in the universe.
It is out of this context that
Experimental science was born.
The issue of the organization of the universe (solar system) came down to the introduction of new technology the collection of data
TO BE CONTINUED….