SCHOOL QUALITY REVIEW (SQR) UPDATE · 2019. 5. 30. · SQR Process 6 •Identifies standards and...

26
SCHOOL QUALITY REVIEW ( SQR ) UPDATE Andrew Strope , Performance and Continuous Improvement Officer January 31, 2019

Transcript of SCHOOL QUALITY REVIEW (SQR) UPDATE · 2019. 5. 30. · SQR Process 6 •Identifies standards and...

  • SCHOOL QUALITY REVIEW (SQR)UPDATE

    Andrew Strope, Performance and Continuous Improvement Officer

    January 31, 2019

  • Overview

    2

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1

    2

    5

    4

    3

  • Objective

    3

    Update IPS Board of School Commissioners on

    the SQR process, provide recommendations,

    and highlight SQR experience

    through school spotlights

  • SQR Purposes

    4

    Provides a common understanding of quality and effectiveness across schools

    Fosters dialogue between a school and Central Services around

    quality and effectiveness

    Supplies school and district leaders with qualitative data collected from

    teachers, school leaders, parents, students and community members

    Supports district decisions on interventions and supports, restarts,

    closures and expansion

  • 5

    • A comprehensive school visit includes stakeholder interviews with school leadership, teachers and staff, community partners, students and families.

    • Attended by a cross-functional, internal district team, SQR visits took place late November through December.

    • Each school will receive a comprehensive report including areas of celebration and areas of opportunity.

    SQR Process

    Overview

  • SQR Process

    6

    • Identifies standards and related indicators of a quality school

    • Used as the foundation for evidence

    • Aligned with rubric

    • Used to collect evidence during site visit

    • School leadership, teachers, staff, parents, students, community partners

    • Questions aligned to rubric

    • Summarizes celebration and areas for improvement

    • Copy provided to the school leadership

    Site Visit Components

  • 7 School Determination

    *Based on 2017–18 ISTEP data

    SQR Process

    1 Schools in the bottom quartile of proficiency scores.*

    LE

    NS

    2 Of these schools, the bottom half of growth scores.*

    LE

    NS

    In addition to considering criteria that the state will use to determine intervention, IPS will use the following:

  • 8

    2018–19 SQR

    IPS SQR Eligible Schools

    Schools that met criteria to receive an SQR in SY 2018–19 are:

    School

    Stephen Foster School 67

    Eleanor Skillen School 34

    Thomas Gregg Neighborhood School

    Ignite Achievement Academy @ Elder Diggs 42

    Kindezi Academy @ Joyce Kilmer 69

    James Russell Lowell School 51

    Louis B. Russell Jr. School 48

  • 9

    2018–19 SQR

    Timeline/Next Steps

    • Name schools that are eligible for a SQR based on lenses of proficiency and growth.

    • Conduct meetings with school leadership team and staff to share information regarding SQR processes.

    • Inform school communities via letters, open houses and/or school events.

    • Complete SQR at each school.

    • Share findings with IPS’ Board of School Commissioners and make appropriate recommendations.

  • Summary

    10

    It is important to consider multiple measures when assessing

    school performance, as we must define our own success.

    IPS proactively engages in determining and implementing

    interventions and supports for low-performing schools.

    A SQR will provide contextual and qualitative data to better

    inform IPS decisions and recommendations.

  • 2018-19 SQR

    11 Results and School Spotlight

  • 12

    2018–19 SQR

    Stephen Foster School 67 Findings

    • Learning environment supports collaborative learning; principal has a strong background in instructional coaching that will benefit PD; strong relationships with community partners who support the school

    • Checks for Understanding, differentiation; opportunities to provide consistent feedback and instructional support to staff

    • Create and implement a school vision and consistent school wide expectations; develop a PD plan to support staff capacity around classroom management

  • 13

    2018–19 SQR

    Eleanor Skillen School 34 Findings

    • Positive relationships between staff, students and families; clear expectations and procedures; deep level of commitment from staff and community members

    • Student engagement and rigor; empower staff to set high academic and behavior expectations; create communication structures with stakeholders specifically around academic progress

    • Develop a school mission/vision grounded in academic results; provide clear understanding of current and historical data; focus on quality lesson planning; create a community council

  • 14

    2018–19 SQR

    Ignite Achievement Academy @ Elder Diggs 42 Findings

    • Key stakeholders take pride in school and want it to be successful; evidence of positive visual culture; school values are showcased, well communicated, and integrated

    • Increase instructional rigor; consistently use of curriculum; continue to implement school wide-student culture systems

    • Implement consistent school wide schedule/routines to reduce loss of instructional time; create communication systems between leadership to teachers and leadership with families

  • 15

    2018–19 SQR

    Kindezi Academy @ Joyce Kilmer 69 Findings

    • Teachers executing higher order questioning techniques; positive and supportive learning environment that encourages risk taking; teachers supporting multiple learning styles; effective checks for understanding executed throughout instruction; high investment of community partners

    • Additional opportunities to effectively engage with parents by leadership and staff; students are still developing awareness of academic progress; consistent community engagement practices

    • Implement required communication structures/policies; create a community council; continue to develop and support a data driven student culture

  • 16

    2018–19 SQR

    James Russell Lowell School 51 Findings

    • Effective implementation of professional learning communities (PLCs); positive transition to new leadership; strong morning routine; clear school mission/vision

    • Student engagement and time-on-task; ensure staff investment and understanding of goals; family engagement strategies; alignment between learning targets and activities

    • Build stakeholder understanding of school goals; support effective lesson planning to increase student engagement; create communication structures with stakeholders specifically around academic progress

  • 17

    2018–19 SQR

    School Spotlight

  • Louis B Russell

    At Louis B. Russell, Jr. Elementary School our mission is to

    provide a safe and nurturing environment that stimulates

    academic excellence for all students.

    The vision of Louis B. Russell, Jr. Elementary is to stimulate

    life-long learners that are equipped to be innovative and

    productive citizens in our global society.

    We are an Opportunity Culture School, servicing students in

    Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 6. We offer Collaborative

    Kindergarten, Life Skills (Primary/Intermediate) and focus on

    Social Emotional Learning for all stakeholders. Small Group

    instruction is essential to the academic/social growth of our

    students.

    18 Mission and Vision

  • Louis B Russell

    19 SQR Findings

    • Respectful classroom environments created

    • Coherent vision supported by school community

    • High expectations for all stakeholders

    • High community engagement

    • Use of multiple data sources to assess student learning

    • Clear measurement goals created and monitored

    • Communication of expectations to stakeholders

    • Culturally Responsive Teaching

  • Louis B Russell

    PLC Framework Created/Monitored

    Professional Learning Plan/SIP Wrap-around Meetings

    Guided Reading, Gradual Release (Math), Culture/Climate

    Opportunity Culture (MCL)

    44% of our SPED students have already grown one or more

    levels, 67% of those students have grown one level, 33% have

    grown 2-5 TRC levels.

    100% of Grade 3 students showed growth on IREAD3 practice

    assessments

    20 Response to SQR

  • Thomas Gregg Neighborhood School

    Mission:

    Thomas Gregg Neighborhood

    School prepares students to

    contribute to the quality of life of

    their community through rigorous

    academics, personalized learning,

    civic involvement and

    social/emotional skill development.

    Core Values:

    Take Care of Yourself

    Take Care of Each Other

    Take Care of This Place

    Grades Served:

    PreK – 6th Grade

    21 Mission and Vision

    Specific Programming:

  • 22

    Thomas Gregg Neighborhood School

    SQR Findings

    • High student engagement was observed in every classroom with opportunities for collaborative student interactions provided

    • Leadership has done an effective job cultivating commitment to and ownership of the school's vision and mission as evidenced by the vision/mission being communicated consistently and in a variety of ways to all stakeholders, including students, families, and community partners. Additionally, there are systems in place to improve outcomes (PLC, tickets, student/teacher ratio, feedback protocol).

    • While it is evident that a strong school culture of high expectations has been created, the team challenges current leadership to continue to develop and build trust and inclusivity amongst all stakeholders to foster positive relationships.

    • Support integration of college and career readiness into buildings and classrooms. Begin to reference the ties between daily learning activities to opportunities to access college and career preparation after graduation more explicitly throughout the school day.

  • Thomas Gregg Neighborhood School

    In Year 2, TGNS has opted into several key partnerships that

    will aid in achieving our goals through refining a data team

    structure across all grade levels K-6 and ensuring we are

    providing rigorous, highly aligned instruction ELA and Math

    across all classrooms.

    Continue Service Learning, Science/Social Studies & 12-Day

    Instructional Cycle that is allowing for strategic and targeted

    instruction.

    Ticketing System in place to coordinate student/family service

    needs and referrals

    23 Response to SQR

  • 24

    2018–19 SQR

    Recommendations

    Intended Purpose of the SQR:

    • Supports district decisions on interventions and supports, restarts, closures and

    expansion

    Process Used to Determine Recommendation

    • IPS academic leadership utilized a decision protocol process to help guide and

    structure the conversations

    • The protocol takes both qualitative and quantitative data into account, including the

    following:

    • Leadership Context

    • Support Context

    • SQR takeaways

    2018-2019 SQR Recommendation

    • IPS staff and leadership do not recommend that any of the 2018-2019 SQR schools

    be restarted for the 2019-2020 school year

  • 25

    • Utilize process as a learning opportunity across the organization by increasing the scope of schools. Some potential options include:

    • All schools receive an SQR

    • Top performing and lowest performing receive SQR

    • Schools request an SQR

    • Perform SQR’s on a rolling basis

    SQR Process

    Future State