School data - southwest Dothan
-
Upload
century-21-key-realty -
Category
Education
-
view
510 -
download
2
description
Transcript of School data - southwest Dothan
School Performance School Performance Comparisons for the Comparisons for the
Dothan City School SystemDothan City School System
Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama September 28, 2009
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
3 M 22.7 93.3 65.5 3 M 77.3 66.7 39.7 26.7 25.8
4 M 19.4 92.3 66.1 4 M 80.6 44.4 39.3 47.9 26.8
5 M 33.3 58.8 60.6 5 M 66.7 35.3 33.2 23.5 27.4
3 R 22.7 66.7 69.8 3 R 77.3 47.1 40.0 19.6 29.8
4 R 19.4 69.2 71.6 4 R 80.6 44.4 40.0 24.8 31.6
5 R 33.3 70.6 69.7 5 R 66.7 38.2 38.6 32.4 31.1
Poverty Students (P)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Non-Poverty Students (N)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Gap Between Groups (N - P)
School % at Level IV is 10 or more points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is within +/- 1 point of target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points below target percentage.School % at Level IV is 10 or more points below target percentage.
School gap between groups is low AND both groups' scores are high, as compared to target.
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
3 M 45.5 80.0 59.7 3 M 50.0 63.6 35.3 16.4 24.4
4 M 31.3 76.2 59.9 4 M 62.7 40.5 35.2 35.7 24.7
5 M 45.1 47.8 53.7 5 M 54.9 39.3 30.3 8.5 23.4
3 R 45.5 60.0 63.1 3 R 50.0 45.5 35.9 14.6 27.1
4 R 31.3 57.1 64.9 4 R 62.7 45.2 35.1 11.9 29.8
5 R 45.1 65.2 62.5 5 R 54.9 35.7 35.1 29.5 27.3
HEARD ELEMENTARY
Gap Between Groups (W - B)
Black Students (B)
Gra
de
Tes
t
School
Gra
de
Tes
t
School
White Students (W)
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY093rd Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY093rd Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY094th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY094th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY095th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Heard
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY095th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
School % at Level IV is 10 or more points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is within +/- 1 point of target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points below target percentage.School % at Level IV is 10 or more points below target percentage.
School gap is low AND both groups' scores are high, as compared to target.
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
3 M 51.0 57.7 59.7 3 M 36.3 27.0 35.3 30.7 24.4
4 M 45.8 68.4 59.9 4 M 45.8 23.7 35.2 44.7 24.7
5 M 59.3 59.3 53.7 5 M 38.5 5.7 30.3 53.6 23.4
3 R 51.0 55.8 63.1 3 R 36.3 32.4 35.9 23.3 27.1
4 R 47.0 71.8 64.9 4 R 44.6 18.9 35.1 52.9 29.8
5 R 59.8 67.3 62.5 5 R 38.0 34.3 35.1 33.0 27.3
HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY
Gap Between Groups (W - B)
Black Students (B)
Gra
de
Tes
t
School
Gra
de
Tes
t
School
White Students (W)
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
3 M 54.9 62.5 65.5 3 M 45.1 30.4 39.7 32.1 25.8
4 M 47.0 64.1 66.1 4 M 53.0 31.8 39.3 32.3 26.8
5 M 52.8 54.2 60.6 5 M 47.3 20.9 33.2 33.2 27.4
3 R 54.9 62.5 69.8 3 R 45.1 37.0 40.0 25.5 29.8
4 R 48.2 70.0 71.6 4 R 51.8 27.9 40.0 42.1 31.6
5 R 53.3 65.3 69.7 5 R 46.7 41.9 38.6 23.5 31.1
Poverty Students (P)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Non-Poverty Students (N)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Gap Between Groups (N - P)
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY093rd Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY093rd Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY094th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY094th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY095th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Highlands
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY095th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
School % at Level IV is 10 or more points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is within +/- 1 point of target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points below target percentage.School % at Level IV is 10 or more points below target percentage.
School gap between groups is low AND both groups' scores are high, as compared to target.
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
6 M 30.9 44.1 38.4 6 M 65.5 11.2 15.3 32.9 23.1
7 M 32.1 35.2 34.1 7 M 64.3 12.0 14.7 23.2 19.3
8 M 27.2 22.7 34.6 8 M 69.8 8.9 12.6 13.9 22.0
6 R 30.9 66.1 69.0 6 R 65.5 40.8 43.0 25.3 26.1
7 R 32.0 55.6 57.0 7 R 64.5 22.9 29.1 32.6 27.9
8 R 27.5 31.8 47.4 8 R 69.4 15.3 18.4 16.5 29.1
BEVERLYE MIDDLE
White Students (W)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Gra
de
Te
st
Black Students (B)
School
Gap Between Groups (W -
B)
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
6 M 27.8 39.6 44.5 6 M 72.3 14.5 18.2 25.1 26.3
7 M 26.2 34.1 40.6 7 M 73.8 15.3 15.9 18.8 24.8
8 M 21.6 14.3 40.1 8 M 78.4 12.6 14.3 1.7 25.8
6 R 27.8 73.6 76.2 6 R 72.3 39.9 45.4 33.7 30.8
7 R 26.0 47.7 63.7 7 R 74.0 31.2 32.1 16.5 31.6
8 R 21.9 25.7 52.9 8 R 78.1 19.2 22.1 6.5 30.9
Poverty Students (P)
School
Gap Between Groups (N -
P)
Gra
de
Te
st
Non-Poverty Students (N)
School
Gra
de
Te
st
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY096th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY097th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY098th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY098th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY097th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Beverlye Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY096th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
School % at Level IV is 10 or more points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is within +/- 1 point of target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points below target percentage.School % at Level IV is 10 or more points below target percentage.
School gap between groups is low AND both groups' scores are high, as compared to target.
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
6 M 27.7 14.0 38.4 6 M 66.5 5.8 15.3 8.1 23.1
7 M 24.0 4.9 34.1 7 M 71.4 5.7 14.7 (0.9) 19.3
8 M 30.3 29.8 34.6 8 M 65.8 10.8 12.6 19.0 22.0
6 R 29.0 60.0 69.0 6 R 65.2 39.6 43.0 20.4 26.1
7 R 23.8 46.3 57.0 7 R 71.5 27.6 29.1 18.7 27.9
8 R 30.1 46.8 47.4 8 R 66.0 19.4 18.4 27.4 29.1
HONEYSUCKLE MIDDLE
White Students (W)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Gra
de
Te
st
Black Students (B)
School
Gap Between Groups (W -
B)
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
6 M 33.6 13.5 44.5 6 M 66.5 5.8 18.2 7.6 26.3
7 M 26.3 6.7 40.6 7 M 73.7 5.6 15.9 1.1 24.8
8 M 23.9 29.7 40.1 8 M 76.1 12.7 14.3 17.0 25.8
6 R 34.2 56.6 76.2 6 R 65.8 43.1 45.4 13.5 30.8
7 R 26.2 55.6 63.7 7 R 73.8 25.2 32.1 30.4 31.6
8 R 23.7 40.5 52.9 8 R 76.3 23.5 22.1 17.0 30.9
Poverty Students (P)
School
Gap Between Groups (N -
P)
Gra
de
Te
st
Non-Poverty Students (N)
School
Gra
de
Te
st
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY096th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY096th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY097th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY097th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY098th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Honeysuckle Middle
Trend in ARMT Results, FY05 - FY098th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
School % at Level IV is 10 or more points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points above target percentage.School % at Level IV is within +/- 1 point of target percentage.School % at Level IV is 1 to 9.9 points below target percentage.School % at Level IV is 10 or more points below target percentage.
School gap between groups is low AND both groups' scores are high, as compared to target.
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
11 M 39.9 17.5 26.1 11 M 57.0 8.2 9.1 9.3 17.0 12 M 42.9 17.4 26.8 12 M 54.6 7.8 10.2 9.6 16.6 11 R 39.8 19.4 16.9 11 R 57.1 3.4 4.6 16.0 12.3 12 R 43.1 24.8 25.3 12 R 54.5 6.5 7.2 18.3 18.1 11 S 52.8 47.4 32.8 11 S 47.2 11.8 7.3 35.6 25.5 12 S 42.9 30.6 30.9 12 S 54.6 5.8 8.7 24.7 22.2
DOTHAN HIGH
White Students (W) Black Students (B) Gap Between Groups (W - B)
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Gra
de
Te
st
School
State State
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
% in Group
% at Level IV
% at Level IV
School Gap (%)
State Gap (%)
11 M 48.8 15.1 27.6 11 M 51.2 9.1 10.5 6.0 17.1 12 M 55.3 15.4 27.1 12 M 44.7 8.7 11.7 6.7 15.4 11 R 48.7 18.3 17.6 11 R 51.4 2.3 5.5 16.0 12.1 12 R 55.5 21.8 25.0 12 R 44.5 5.6 8.9 16.2 16.0 11 S 58.3 42.9 33.1 11 S 41.7 13.3 11.0 29.5 22.2 12 S 55.3 25.0 30.2 12 S 44.7 7.9 11.4 17.1 18.8
Non-Poverty Students (NP)
School
Gra
de
Te
st
School
Poverty Students (P) Gap Between Groups (NP - P)
Gra
de
Te
st
FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Dothan HS
Trend in AHSGE Results, FY05 - FY0911th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING SCIENCE
FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Dothan HS
Trend in AHSGE Results, FY05 - FY0911th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING SCIENCE
FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Dothan HS
Trend in AHSGE Results, FY05 - FY0912th Grade, Non-Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING SCIENCE
FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09 FY05FY06
FY07FY08
FY09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
% o
f S
ubgr
oup
at L
evel
IV
State Dothan Dothan HS
Trend in AHSGE Results, FY05 - FY0912th Grade, Pov erty Subgroup
MATH READING SCIENCE