Schematic Design Summary VISION Cheyenne …cheyenneairport.com/6th Penny Raw...

Schematic Design SummaryCheyenne Regional Airport09 February 2011

Report prepared by Architectural Alliance International, Inc

VISION

EXPERIENCE

COMMITMENT

Schematic Design SummaryCheyenne Regional Airport

09 February 2011

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Sense of Place . Sense of Place Design Process . Cheyenne Sense of Place Research . Architectural Design Research

3. Design Process . Workshop 1 . Workshop 2 . Workshop 3

4. Schematic Design . Building Plans . Room Schedule by Department . Exterior Elevations . Building sections . Building Renderings . Interior Material and Color Palette

5. Site Design


09 February 2011

1. Executive Summary

Executive Summary1.00


09 February 2011

Executive Summary

From September 2010 through February 2011, SEH and Architectural Alliance International were engaged by the Cheyenne Regional Airport to develop a schematic design option for a potential new terminal.

The basis of this design was the 10 March 2008 Cheyenne Regional Airport Terminal Feasibility Study, which studied projected future demand to determine the appropriate size and scope of a future terminal. The Feasibility Study projected annual enplanements to reach 28,900 by the year 2027. In addition, the Feasibility Study examined a number of potential locations for the future terminal, including redevelopment of the existing terminal site as well new potential sites. The Feasibility Study recommended Site 3A, located due East of the existing terminal site, accessed from the redeveloped Airport Parkway. A Conceptual Design was proposed as part of the Feasibility Study.

The Schematic Design effort took the recommendation of Site 3A and the programming and Conceptual Design work of the Feasibility Study as a launching point. The Schematic Design addresses operational needs for the airlines and passenger service improvements such as adequate gate hold seating, pre-security waiting areas, security checkpoint layouts capable of handling current and potential future needs, mechanical and electrical system upgrades, more easily maintainable and aesthetically pleasing finishes, and a strong design presence for the terminal as a representation of the city of Cheyenne and its surrounding region.

Desired capacity was based upon service of two simultaneous Regional Jet departures in regularly scheduled domestic passenger traffic (60 seats per aircraft for a total of 120 seat gate hold capacity). This capacity was further supported by the potential to service narrow body jets in charter operations and the potential to handle diverted flights from Denver.

Executive Summary1.01

Working from the Conceptual Design solution, the preferred Schematic Design was developed through a series of Design Workshops with the full Airport Board and additional meetings with Airport Staff. Through refinements based both on current conditions and reassessments of previous decisions, a revised program was reached to better meet long-term facility needs. After three workshops, Scheme 2C was selected by the Airport Board as the preferred alternative. A two-level facility (with additional partial basement) and accommodations for significant concession space is proposed, with accommodations for additional future expansion. The proposed Schematic Design totals 36,000 sf. This compares to 30,400 sf in the Feasibility Study program document, and 35,000 sf in the Conceptual Design.

Probable construction costs for the terminal building are projected to be $297 per square foot, for a total construction cost of $10,700,000. (See Connico Preliminary Rough Order of Magnitude Estimate, provided under separate cover, for detailed information regarding terminal project cost.) Probable construction costs have been estimated at $3,200,000 for the new parking lot and related access improvements and $2,500,000 for the new apron. (See SEH supporting documents, provided under separate cover, for detailed information regarding site work costs.) Together, probable construction costs for the new terminal and site work are estimated at a total of $16,400,000. Probable construction costs do not include design fees.


09 February 2011

2. Sense of Place

Sense of Place2.00


09 February 2011

Sense of Place Design Process

VISION AND SENSE OF PLACE

A community’s airport plays an important role in communicating the region’s image to the rest of the world. The airport is the gateway to the region for a great number of visitors each year and the first and last thing travelers see. It is also the place that welcomes home residents of the Cheyenne region, and it should be a great source of pride. An overall coordinated vision benefits the long-term and incremental growth of airport facilities and helps unite planning and design efforts over many years.

Developed concurrently with the terminal’s programming and early building and site design, “Sense of Place” research was conducted to inform how the design relates to the site, as well as inspire the building’s forms and materials.

Sense of Place’ Boards

Anchorage, Alaska Memphis , Tennessee

Examples of ‘Sense of Place’ integration

Sense of Place’ Boards

Examples of ‘Sense of Place’ integration

Sense of Place2.01


09 February 2011

Sense of Place2.02

Cheyenne Sense of Place Research

Referred to as “The Magic City of the Plains” Cheyenne, the capital of Wyo-ming, is the gateway to natural wonders, relics of the frontier, and outdoor recreation. Research was conducted to identify historical, cultural and physical attributes important to the city and region resulting in a collec-tion of representative imagery ranging from industry, architecture, topog-raphy and cultural influences. The goal of this task was to determine the most appropriate and meaningful imagery that best conveys the spirit of Cheyenne.

Key Findings: A Junction of Railroads- influencing history (first transcontinental railroad) industry, and culture Topography/Landscape - unique landforms , arid plains, and wildlife Architecture - style, material, and form Culture/Heritage - western frontier and cowboy heritage

The development of an all-encompassing design concept relating to certain physical or cultural aspects of the area can contribute greatly to making the airport experience an inviting and memorable one. From this region’s unique topography and landscape to its frontier heritage and deeply rooted western culture, it offers a vast breadth from which to draw inspiration that embodies the most unique aspects of Cheyenne and the region.


09 February 2011

Sense of Place2.03

Cheyenne Sense of Place Research

Topography and Landscape

The topography and unique landscape of endless horizons, vast plains, and outcropping landforms inspired the development of a color and material palette reflective of Cheyenne and the surrounding region. Important man made elements also characteristic of the landscape were used to inform pattern, texture and form. Railroad tracks create a uniform and linear rhythm and pattern cutting through the landscape while snow fences follow the contours of the landscape creating weathered visual texture and unique shadows . All of these elements contribute to a design that is rich with sense of place and meaningful to Cheyenne.

Western Icon

Cheyenne’s deep western frontier heritage is an important part of the city’s past and present. There is strong iconic and identifiable imagery associated with the cowboy and the cowboy culture. The craftsmanship and design associated with saddles, cowboy boots, and western gear is very artistic and beautiful. The tooled and embossed leathers, the silver accents and the filigree patterns can all inspire materials , colors and patterns for the interior design.


09 February 2011

Architectural Design Research

At the beginning of Schematic Design, Architectural Alliance International researched the unique qualities of the City of Cheyenne, its history, cul-ture, and its relationship to the natural surroundings. Four main concepts were identified, which in turn informed the main concepts for the design of the terminal building: ContextBoth the local context of the immediate site and the larger context of the City of Cheyenne and the Upper Great Plains were carefully studied. From the natural context, we’ve identified the regional weather, the prevail-ing NW winds, and the strong solar orientation as important elements . Moreover, man-made structures like the snow fences and the railroads as well as the vernacular buildings became a source of inspiration for parts of the design.

PorchThe concept of a porch can be found at both regional vernacular buildings and more contemporary designs, and functionally relates to the transi-tional space between the inside and the outside of the building. Experi-entially, a “porch” functions as the front door for arriving and departing passengers.

ScreenScreens are architectural elements used to modulate and filter sun light, control winds, and filter or screen views. Inspired by the local snow fences and railroad cattle cars, these screens also have the potential of introduc-ing dynamic and controlled patterns of shadow and light into the building.

SustainabilityWith the belief that every buiding design is a careful response to its natural and cultural sites, the schematic design represents an energy efficient building that implements the sustainable strategies of daylighting, water efficiency, use of local and renewable materials, and highly efficient me-chanical systems among others.

Context

Porch

Screen

Sustainability

Sense of Place2.05


09 February 2011

3. Design Process

Design Process3.00


09 February 2011

Program Refinement

During the course of the workshops with Airport Staff and the Airport Board, a number of changes were made to programming assumptions developed during the 2008 Feasibility Study. These changes were driven by changes in current conditions and reassessments of previous decisions. Among the critical changes that impacted the Schematic Design:

Restaurant Size, Location, and Scope The Feasibility Study assumed a large, signature restaurant and bar lo-cated on the second floor of the terminal that would be directed primarily at Cheyenne residents rather than passengers. Based on the financial difficulties of the existing restaurant at the current terminal, the recent expansion of restaurant offerings within Cheyenne, and the significant in-vestment involved in a large restaurant, the Board ultimately decided that a smaller restaurant with more limited offerings, located to serve primarily passengers would be more appropriate.

Multi-story BuildingThe Level Two program in the Conceptual Design was dominated by the restaurant component, and when this was relocated, there was a question as to whether or not the building should remain a multi-story building. The Board determined that the multi-story building was still justified because the cost difference was determined to be insignificant, the second story gave the building additional presence on the site, it programmatically made sense to separate the administrative functions, and because of the efficiencies allowed by the partial basement.

Gate Hold and SecurityThe Gate Hold area was increased from a capacity of 60 in the Feasibility Study to 120 in Schematic Design to allow it to accommodate two simul-taneous regional jet departures (the ability to accommodate narrow-body jets and to handle diverted planes from Denver was also a factor in this decision). The Security Checkpoint was enlarged to allow it to accommo-date the latest TSA requirements.

Additional Concession SpaceThe Board directed that additional concession space (beyond the restau-rant) should be included as part of the Schematic Design. These tenant spaces may not be strictly driven by passenger traffic, so the spaces were located at the east end of the terminal, where they are adjacent to the short term parking lot. This location also allows for the spaces to be easily repurposed for future terminal expansion. Further, this location would allow the concession space to be modified or eliminated during future design phases without significantly impacting the terminal layout. The current layout shows three spaces totaling approximately 500 sf each, capable of accommodating office or small retail tenants.

Airline Ticket OfficesBased on the success of the recently instituted American Eagle service to DFW, the Board directed that the Schematic Design should accommodate three full Airline Ticket Offices in addition to a dedicated TSA space. The Conceptual Design had shown TSA occupying a future ATO space, but this would have required TSA to relocate should a third Airline be recruited, and left no swing space for charter operations.

Design Process3.01


09 February 2011

Workshop 1

Workshop 1 was held on 27 September 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne Regional Airport. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and Airport Staff. The Feasibility Study was validated, especially relative to changes in airport operations driven by the addition of American Eagle service and the closure of the existing restaurant.

The design process was explained, and examples of previous projects were shown.

Results of initial Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research were presented.

Sustainability was identified as an important consideration, especially to the extent that careful building design, orientation, and selection of appropriate building systems could reduce long-term operating costs.

Design Process3.02


09 February 2011

Four plans were presented that demonstrated options for the restaurant within the new terminal.

Schemes 1A and 1B are both one level schemes. Scheme 1A locates the restaurant adjacent to the Gate Hold for easy passenger access. Scheme 1B locates the restaurant to the west, for adjacencies to the Loading Dock and Short Term Parking and ease of after-hours access.

Design Process3.03

Floor Plan Scheme 1B

Floor Plan Scheme 1A

Workshop 2

Workshop 2 was held on 10 November 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meeting. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board.

The Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research was presented to the Airport Board.


09 February 2011

Design Process3.04

Sketches were presented demonstrating both a two level option and a one level option with a high-roofed volume over the public spaces.

The Airport Board selected Scheme 2A as their preferred option, demonstrating strong support for a two level option. There was, however, some concern about whether the terminal could support a large, signature restaurant. They requested another alternative be prepared demonstrating a smaller scale restaurant located on Level One, but still retaining administrative functions on Level Two.

Concept Sketches

Floor Plan Scheme 2BFloor Plan Scheme 2A

Workshop 2

Schemes 2A and 2B are both two level schemes. Unlike the Conceptual Design, which show the two level massing located to the East, these schemes shift the two level massing to the West, still retaining a generous double-height space at the Arrivals and Departures Hall and the Gate Hold space. Both show a large, signature Restaurant space located at the Northwest of the terminal to maximize views to the airfield. Scheme 2A shows the Security Checkpoint oriented East-West, whereas Scheme 2B shows it oriented North-South.


09 February 2011

Design Process3.05

Scheme 2C is an alternative showing a smaller restaurant located immedi-ately to the west of the Gate Hold space, but still retaining an upper level for the administrative functions and public viewing space. Scheme 2C has the advantage of offering better service for passengers, while still main-taining strong views to the airfield.

Scheme 2C was ultimately selected by the Airport Board.

Workshop 3

Workshop 3 was held on 08 December 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meet-ing. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board.

As requested by the Board at the previous workshop, two schemes were presented. Scheme 2A is a refinement of the preferred plan presented at the previous meeting with a large, signature restaurant located in the northwest corner of Level Two.

Floor Plan Scheme 2CFloor Plan Scheme 2A


09 February 2011

Workshop 3

Interior renderings were presented, showing how the public spaces of the terminal are impacted by the changes between the 2A and 2C schemes.

Design Process3.06

SCHEME 2CSCHEME 2A

SECTION


09 February 2011

Design Process3.07

Workshop 3

Two alternate exterior expressions were presented. Both options show a curbside façade dominated by glazing with vestibules projecting through the façade, and both are anchored by large stone or concrete panels.

Option 1 utilizes a random patterned metal screening element along the upper stories, used to moderate the solar exposure into the spaces. Option 2 shows a more consistent upper façade of metal panels, interrupted by large glass openings crowned by projecting roof forms which act to shield the sun.

The options demonstrate two possible treatments of a curbside canopy – one a solid projecting element and the other made up of glass and steel. The Board preferred Option 2, but expressed some concern that the design was still too heavy or boxy, and further expressed concern about the building being dominated by flat roofs. This concern was addressed in subsequent refinements of the final Schematic Design.


09 February 2011

4. Schematic Design

Schematic Design4.00


09 February 2011

UP

DN

UP

DN

2754 SF

Gate Ho ld44

1457 SF

Passeng er Scr een ing61

3307 SF

Departure / Arr ival Hall62

3116 SF

Bag gag e Cla im64

629 S

F

Depla

ning C

orrido

r65

Gate Lobby and Security

Operations

Public Space

Concessions

Building Systems

152 SF

Vestibule2

524 SF

Bag ga ge3

429 SF

Dock / Re ceiv ing9

152 SF

Vesti bule16

266 SF

Kitchen17

LEVEL 1

157 SF

Lob by21

68 SF

Vesti bule22

981 SF

Restau rant26

63 SF

Monitor31

69 SF

Scre ening32

109 SF

Ven ding33

73 SF

Vesti bule35 50 SF

Gate 141

50 SF

Gate 242

31 SF

Jan43

95 SF

Unisex50

305 SF

Me n51

305 SF

Wo me n52

160 SF

Rental Car53

160 SF

Rental Car55

161 SF

Rental Car59

160 SF

Rental Car66

0 32 48 64

322 SF

AT O68

322 SF

AT O69

322 SF

AT O70

323 SF

TSA Ba g Scre ening71

487 SF

TSA Off ice72

2128 SF

Bag ga ge Ma ke- Up73

2723 SF

Ticketin g Hall63

361 SF

Circ74

454 SF

Con ce ss io ns75

502 SF

Con ce ss io ns76

529 SF

Con ce ss io ns77

92 SF

Vesti bule79

54 SF

Toilet80

54 SF

Toilet81

41 SF

Jan82

JIHGFCBA K L M N O Q R S

4

55

6

2

33

0.9 11

D.5

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

FUTUREGATEHOLDEXPANSION

FUTUREEXPANSION

1.8

32' -

0"

23' -

0"

30' -

0"

597 SF

Concession C irculat ion97

DN

DN

663 SF

Conf Ro om10

Public Space

Offices

Building Systems

708 SF

Upper Gal lery15

LEVEL 2

69 SF

Lob by23

230 SF

Stair 224

OP EN TO B E LOW

OP EN TO B E LOW641 SF

Break-Out36

R OOF

OP EN TO B E LOW

67 SF

Buffet84

83 SF

Toilet85


4

5

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

43 SF

Jan86

46 SF

Storage87

D.5

0 32 48 64

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

187 SF

Kitchen88139 SF

Office89118 SF

Office90

118 SF

Office91

314 SF

Director92

157 SF

Admin S tor age93 582 SF

Reception / Circ94

72 SF

Intern95

64 SF

Cop y96

1.8

32' -

0"

23' -

0"

1095 SF

Circ99

UP

UP

1368 SF

Mecha nical Ro om37

Concessions

Building Systems

520 SF

Concess ion St ora ge38

1719 SF

Utility Tunnel39

LOWER LEVEL

1306 SF

Storm Ref uge83


4

55

6

2

33

0.9

1

0 32 48 64

D.5

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

1.8

23' -

0"

30' -

0"

359 SF

Storage98

level 2

level 1

lower level

Plan Description

Level One, 25,300 sfThe Schematic Design proposes a facility with primary public and airport operations on the ground level, with public access from two entrances along the curbside (one at Ticketing and one at Bag Claim) and additional entrances from both the East and West Short Term Parking Lots. The Ticketing Hall, Arrivals and Departures Hall, and Bag Claim together form a generous public space that would be populated with welcoming soft seat-ing and a fireplace lounge for waiting passengers and the public.

In the Ticketing Hall, the facility is designed to accommodate three Airline Ticket Offices (ATO) with adjacent Baggage Make-Up spaces. There is dedicated space for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of-fices. The Security Checkpoint is designed to accommodate the latest TSA requirements and to provide flexibility for future changes in security requirements. The Gate Hold contains seating for 120 and two departure gates with room for easy expansion to a third departure gate or the option to add a passenger boarding bridge. There is a fully separated Deplaning Corridor. The Bag Claim provides 50 linear feet of flat plate baggage claim area, with space to accommodate a future ‘T’ shaped device to provide additional capacity.

Located immediately adjacent to the Gate Hold, a Restaurant conces-sion space is open to the public but primarily oriented towards meeting the needs of flight passengers. The Restaurant and associated Kitchen totals 1250 sf. In addition to the Restaurant space, the Schematic Design accommodates three additional concession spaces at the east end of the terminal, totaling 1500 sf of leasable space and 600 sf of associated circulation space (this space is designed to be easily convertible to future Airline Ticket Offices should future passenger demand require it). There are also four Rental Car Offices provided, totaling 640 sf.

Level Two, 5,400 sfA second floor over the west portion of the building would be served by an elevator and provide administrative space and a large Conference Room capable of holding Airport Board meetings with public seating. There is an Upper Gallery providing views to the airfield and the Arrivals and Depar-tures Hall for the general public and a Breakout Space with soft seating. The Administration area contains four office spaces and support functions, including a Kitchen. The Kitchen, Upper Gallery, and Breakout Space can work in conjunction with the Conference Room to host public functions.

Lower Level, 5,300 sf A partial basement is designed for provision of Mechanical space and easy distribution to the upper floors through a Utility Tunnel. Storage space is provided both for the Airport and for concession users. Additional space is provided for storm refuge of up to 260 people. As the design progresses, the exact extents of the partial basement will need to be determined based on Mechanical and Storage needs (in concert with budget refinement).



09 February 2011

UP

DN

UP

DN

2754 SF

Gate Ho ld44

1457 SF

Passeng er Scr een ing61

3307 SF

Departure / Arr ival Hall62

3116 SF

Bag gag e Cla im64

629 S

F

Depla

ning C

orrido

r65


Operations

Public Space

Concessions

Building Systems

152 SF

Vestibule2

524 SF

Bag ga ge3

429 SF

Dock / Re ceiv ing9

152 SF

Vesti bule16

266 SF

Kitchen17

LEVEL 1

157 SF

Lob by21

68 SF

Vesti bule22

981 SF

Restau rant26

63 SF

Monitor31

69 SF

Scre ening32

109 SF

Ven ding33

73 SF

Vesti bule35 50 SF

Gate 141

50 SF

Gate 242

31 SF

Jan43

95 SF

Unisex50

305 SF

Me n51

305 SF

Wo me n52

160 SF

Rental Car53

160 SF

Rental Car55

161 SF

Rental Car59

160 SF

Rental Car66

0 32 48 64

322 SF

AT O68

322 SF

AT O69

322 SF

AT O70

323 SF

TSA Ba g Scre ening71

487 SF

TSA Off ice72

2128 SF

Bag ga ge Ma ke- Up73

2723 SF

Ticketin g Hall63

361 SF

Circ74

454 SF

Con ce ss io ns75

502 SF

Con ce ss io ns76

529 SF

Con ce ss io ns77

92 SF

Vesti bule79

54 SF

Toilet80

54 SF

Toilet81

41 SF

Jan82


4

55

6

2

33

0.9 11

D.5

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

FUTUREGATEHOLDEXPANSION

FUTUREEXPANSION

1.8

32' -

0"

23' -

0"

30' -

0"

597 SF

Concession C irculat ion97



09 February 2011

DN

DN

663 SF

Conf Ro om10

Public Space

Offices

Building Systems

708 SF

Upper Gal lery15

LEVEL 2

69 SF

Lob by23

230 SF

Stair 224

OP EN TO B E LOW

OP EN TO B E LOW641 SF

Break-Out36

R OOF

OP EN TO B E LOW

67 SF

Buffet84

83 SF

Toilet85


4

5

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

43 SF

Jan86

46 SF

Storage87

D.5

0 32 48 64

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

187 SF

Kitchen88139 SF

Office89118 SF

Office90

118 SF

Office91

314 SF

Director92

157 SF

Admin S tor age93 582 SF

Reception / Circ94

72 SF

Intern95

64 SF

Cop y96

1.8

32' -

0"

23' -

0"

1095 SF

Circ99



09 February 2011

UP

UP

1368 SF

Mecha nical Ro om37

Concessions

Building Systems

520 SF

Concess ion St ora ge38

1719 SF

Utility Tunnel39

LOWER LEVEL

1306 SF

Storm Ref uge83


4

55

6

2

33

0.9

1

0 32 48 64

D.5

1' -

6"27

' - 0

"28

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"20

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

1.8

23' -

0"

30' -

0"

359 SF

Storage98



09 February 2011


Operations

Baggage Make-Up Level 1 2128 SF

Baggage Level 1 524 SF

TSA Office Level 1 487 SF

Circ Level 1 361 SF

TSA Bag Screening Level 1 323 SF

ATO Level 1 322 SF

ATO Level 1 322 SF

ATO Level 1 322 SF

4790 SF

Public Space

Departure / Arrival Hall Level 1 3307 SF

Baggage Claim Level 1 3116 SF

Ticketing Hall Level 1 2723 SF

Circ Level 2 1095 SF

Upper Gallery Level 2 708 SF

Break-Out Level 2 641 SF

Concession Circulation Level 1 597 SF

Men Level 1 305 SF

Women Level 1 305 SF

Stair 1 Level 1 230 SF

Stair 2 Level 2 230 SF

Lobby Level 1 157 SF

Vestibule Level 1 152 SF


Unisex Level 1 95 SF


Toilet Level 2 83 SF

Lobby Level 2 69 SF


14126 SF

35993 SF

Building Systems

Utility Tunnel Lower Level 1719 SF

Mechanical Room Lower Level 1368 SF

Storm Refuge Lower Level 1306 SF

Dock / Receiving Level 1 429 SF

Storage Lower Level 359 SF

Jan Level 2 43 SF

Jan Level 1 31 SF

5255 SF

Concessions

Restaurant Level 1 981 SF

Concessions Level 1 529 SF

Concession Storage Lower Level 520 SF



Kitchen Level 1 266 SF

Rental Car Level 1 161 SF




3893 SF


Gate Hold Level 1 2754 SF

Passenger Screening Level 1 1457 SF

Deplaning Corridor Level 1 629 SF

Vending Level 1 109 SF


Screening Level 1 69 SF

Monitor Level 1 63 SF



Gate 1 Level 1 50 SF

Gate 2 Level 1 50 SF

Jan Level 1 41 SF

5403 SF

Offices

Conf Room Level 2 663 SF

Reception / Circ Level 2 582 SF

Director Level 2 314 SF

Kitchen Level 2 187 SF

Admin Storage Level 2 157 SF

Office Level 2 139 SF



Intern Level 2 72 SF

Buffet Level 2 67 SF

Copy Level 2 64 SF

Storage Level 2 46 SF

2526 SF

Room ScheduleRoom Schedule

Shows the Schematic Design building program broken out into the follow-ing departments:

Building Systems – Mechanical and building support spacesConcessions – Leasable spaces, including Restaurant, Rental Car Offices, and other Tenant SpacesGate Lobby and Security – Gate Hold, Security Checkpoint, and associated support spacesOffices – Administrative Offices, Conference Room, and support spacesOperations – Airline Ticket Offices, Baggage Make-Up, Baggage Claim, and support spacesPublic Space – Public gathering, circulation, and support spaces


09 February 2011

south elevation0 5 15 30 FT

west elevation0 5 15 30 FT

Building Elevations

The Schematic Design proposal orients the curbside façade to approxi-mately due south, aligning it with the runway beyond. This orientation allows for favorable solar access, bringing in south light which can be modulated by sunscreening elements and deep overhangs, allowing for more sun in the winter months when it is needed, and less in the summer months when it isn’t.

The south façade is grounded by light colored precast concrete panels at the east end. These are envisioned to relate to the tones of the light sand-stone that is found regionally, and will have texture and tones to enliven them. At the ground level, there will be extensive glazing that is shielded by the deep roadside canopy. The glazing will be penetrated by the two vestibules and the rental car offices, which are envisioned to be clad in wood on both the interior and exterior.

The building massing steps up to its multi-story massing, and at the far west end is terminated by the stair and elevator tower, which is again clad in the precast concrete panels.



09 February 2011

north elevation0 5 15 30 FT

east elevation0 5 15 30 FT

Building Elevations

The upper story of the terminal is clad in a mix of copper metal panels and in select locations, large expanses of glazing that bring daylighting deep into the space. These windows will be carefully located to take advantage of views, and will be treated with sunscreening elements as their exposure requires. Windows on the building’s north façade are able to bring in daylight without concern about heat gain or glare.

The precast panels and metal panels wrap the more utilitarian portions of the terminal’s airside, but the Gate Hold, Restaurant, and Upper Gallery all have expansive views out to the airside and are treated with glazing and articulated copper panels.



09 February 2011

cross section at cafe

cross section at gate hold

Building Sections

In response to the Board’s concerns about a flat-roofed terminal design and that the building looked too boxy or heavy during Workshop 3, the exterior design was reevaluated. A “Butterfly” roof was determined to be a good fit for the terminal, providing a light feeling roof with deep overhangs to provide sun protection. This roof form allows water to be controlled ef-fectively, keeping it from running onto either the curbside or the airside. It also allows for rain water to be collected and retained for site irrigation.



09 February 2011

Building Renderings

A continuous clerestory window immediately below the deep overhang makes the roof appear to float over the building. The continuous glaz-ing at the curbside makes for an easy transition between the interior and the exterior spaces, with the fireplace visible and inviting. A smaller light monitor over the ticketing hall brings sunlight into these spaces.

view of terminal from parking


view of terminal from access road


09 February 2011

view of curb side at baggage claim

view of curb side from SW


view of curb side


09 February 2011

view of gate hold from NE

view of gate hold from NW



09 February 2011

view of arrival/departure hall



09 February 2011

Interior Material and Color Concept A


Interior Material and Color Concept B


09 February 2011


Concrete Floor Pattern


09 February 2011

5. Site Design

Site Design5.00

Schematic Design Summary VISION Cheyenne …cheyenneairport.com/6th Penny Raw...

Documents

Transcript of Schematic Design Summary VISION Cheyenne …cheyenneairport.com/6th Penny Raw...