Scenario 2.0 Comprehensive and Committee Support Tables “Demonstrate the tool’s ability to...

22
Scenario 2.0 Comprehensive and Committee Support Tables “Demonstrate the tool’s ability to collect the data needed to produce a Comprehensive (Comp) Table and how the various Bureau Comp Tables can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table.” 1

Transcript of Scenario 2.0 Comprehensive and Committee Support Tables “Demonstrate the tool’s ability to...

Scenario 2.0 Comprehensive and Committee Support

Tables“Demonstrate the tool’s ability to

collect the data needed to produce a Comprehensive (Comp) Table and how the

various Bureau Comp Tables can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table.”

1

2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).

BFEM Methods•Hierarchy Org Structure•Reports

2

Customers using Method•State•Treasury•DHS•House of Reps•CNCS•ACF•USAID

Demonstration•State: Tracking at various levels

3

2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).

2.1.1 Tracking funds/positions at various levels – via the User Interface Bureau-Level

data

Account-Level data

4

2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).

2.1.2 Tracking based on grouping accounts

This example shows fee accounts

5

2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).

2.1.3 Tracking based on modifications A report that shows

all modifications

6

2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).

2.1.4 Tracking of crosscuts at various levels

This accounts are summed in this

report

These accounts are summed in this

report

2.2 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to assign attributes to data (e.g., to a particular fund type, departmental crosscut, as mandatory/discretionary, as an earmark, etc.).

BFEM Methods•Create and assign GDPs•Mod Types•Allocations•Generic Attributes

7

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, when applicable

Demonstration•Treasury: GDP variations by Approps, Non Approps, Credit Bureaus

8

2.2 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to assign attributes to data (e.g., to a particular fund type, departmental crosscut, as mandatory/discretionary, as an earmark, etc.).

2.2.1 Adding attributes to modifications, funding types, crosscuts, etc.

Demonstration

2.3 Demonstrate that data can be collected at the dollar level, but reported as dollars in thousands or millions depending on the report requirements.

BFEM Methods•Data Load / Configuration

9

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, various collection methods.

Demonstration•House of Reps: Screen shot of whole dollars in UI and Overview Tables in dollars in thousands)

10

2.3 Demonstrate that data can be collected at the dollar level, but reported as dollars in thousands or millions depending on the report requirements.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DETAILED ANALYSIS OF CHANGE BY ORGANIZATION

SALARIES AND EXPENSES FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 14 vs. FY 13 FY 14 vs. FY 13 Enacted Estimates Net Change Net Change Dollars ($000) Dollars ($000) Dollars ($000) Percent % A. MANDATORY CHANGE 967,257 971,897 4,641 0.48% Base Adjustment 1 (5,784) (5,785) (460,601.27%) Cost of Living Adjustment - 8,863 8,863 - Cost of Living Adjustment Annualized - 928 928 - Longevity Increase - 181 181 - Meritorious Increase - 30 30 - Overtime Pay 200 762 562 281% Personnel Base 700,586 700,449 (138) (0.02%) Personnel Benefits 266,469 266,469 - - Reclassifications - - - - Temporary Positions - - - - B. PRICE LEVEL INCREASES - - - - C. PROGRAM CHANGES 265,924 261,284 (4,641) (1.75%) House Leadership Offices 1,250 849 (401) (32.08%) Members' Representational Allowances 159,188 152,990 (6,198) (3.89%) Standing Committees, Special & Select 8,491 6,745 (1,746) (20.56%) Committees on Appropriations 2,568 2,010 (558) (21.73%) Salaries, Officers and Employees 70,098 74,401 4,303 6.14% Allowances and Expenses 24,329 24,289 (41) (0.17%) TOTAL 1,233,181 1,233,181 - - POSITIONS 12,845 12,845 - -

2.3.1 Data can be reported as required

House of Representatives

collects$s in whole numbers.

House of Representatives

reports$s in thousands.

2.4 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to collect and report on fixed costs (e.g., salary, benefits, unemployment, rents, Departmental Working Capital Fund charges, etc.).

BFEM Methods•Modification Type with Preconfigured Modification Names

11

Customers using Method•State•Treasury•House of Reps

Demonstration•State: Fixed costs

12

2.4 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to collect and report on fixed costs (e.g., salary, benefits, unemployment, rents, Departmental Working Capital Fund charges, etc.).

2.4.1 Modifications can be collected and reported on any type of cost

Adding a modification

Reporting on Costs

2.5 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture data and report at the object class level if required.

BFEM Methods•Collect and Report by Allocation•Collect and Report by Modification

13

Customers using Method•State•Treasury•CNCS•DHS•House of Reps

Demonstration•State: BOC crosscut

14

2.5 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture data and report at the object class level if required.

Typical BOC Crosscut user interface

2.5.1 The Budget Object Class is collected for most accounts

2.6 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture comments/explanatory information when modifying a record.

BFEM Methods•Add comment via Add Modification screen

15

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, various collection methods.

Demonstration•State: Add modification

16

2.6 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture comments/explanatory information when modifying a record.

2.6.1 Text can be associated with each modification

2.7 Given that requirements change from submission to submission, demonstrate and/or discuss how an authorized user would add/remove/modify records on the fly.

BFEM Methods•User defined configuration of :

– Organizations– Modifications– GDPs– Allocations– Generic Attributes– Security Assignments

•Customer Administrator to make changes for some report types•Add and Edit Doc Templates

17

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers

Demonstration•State: Flexibility of all entities

18

2.7 Given that requirements change from submission to submission, demonstrate and/or discuss how an authorized user would add/remove/modify records on the fly.

2.7.1 Text can be associated with each modification

Demonstration2.7.2 Text can be associated with each bureau

2.8 Demonstrate that the tool supports the creation of custom data elements that the Department or subordinate organizations (Bureaus and/or Programs) may use for budget formulation.

BFEM Methods•User defined configuration of :

– Modifications– GDPs– Allocations– Generic Attributes– Security Assignments on the org

19

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers

Demonstration•State: Customizing Entities

20

2.8 Demonstrate that the tool supports the creation of custom data elements that the Department or subordinate organizations (Bureaus and/or Programs) may use for budget formulation.

2.8.1 Modify Org Structure

2.8.2 Modify Modifications

2.8.3 Modify GDPs

2.8.4 Modify Allocations

2.9 Demonstrate how Bureau Comp Table data can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table; demonstrate how additional records, such as offsets, can be added to the database at any level of detail and be included in the Committee Support Table (e.g., net receipt sharing, changes in mandatory programs, etc.).

BFEM Methods•Currently:

– Crosstab Reports– Java Reports

•Will be: XML Reports

21

Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, when applicable

Demonstration•State•DOJ•Forest Service

22

2.9 Demonstrate how Bureau Comp Table data can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table; demonstrate how additional records, such as offsets, can be added to the database at any level of detail and be included in the Committee Support Table (e.g., net receipt sharing, changes in mandatory programs, etc.).

Demonstration

2.9.1 Modifications and fund types can be added at any level