Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

27
Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007

Transcript of Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

Page 1: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

Scarab DesignCarnegie Mellon13-14 December 2007

Page 2: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 2

Unique combination of drilling & driving on the moon

Central issues Solutions

Drilling loads

Weigh enough

Mount drill on center

Lower drill to ground

Lunar terrain

Agile suspension

Adjustable suspension

Low cg

Page 3: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 3

Design approach

Strong, slow & reliable

Serial work machine

Face disparate needs of drilling & driving

Arrive at capabilities that complement each other

Page 4: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 4

Weighing enough

Robot weight on lunar surface must support drilling operation

• Up to 250 N downforce & 50 Nm torque required for drilling• Reserve 150 N passing through wheels for stability, torque & margin

against uplift and spin

Total weight on lunar surface > 400 N

400 N / 1.622 m/s2 250 kg vehicle mass

Page 5: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 5

Mounting drill

• Fixed to chassis vs. articulated• Strength & stiffness of load path

through chassis & suspension back to the ground

• Dual as instrument mast

Page 6: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 6

Mobility design

• 4 wheels, directly driven• Skid steered

– Simplicity & Lunokhod precedence

• Passive kinematic suspension• 1 mechanical release• Differential

– Maintain rectangular stability pyramid base

• Linkage differential– Suspension provided attach points– Frees drill workspace– Stiffness

• Pose adjustment– Actuate height of each side– Outboard of differencing effect

Page 7: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 7

Suspension

1.3 m1.4 m

CG h = 0.6 m

Stability pyramid

Page 8: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 8

Wheel actuation

• Local amplifier• Brushless motor• 5:1 planetary• 80:1 harmonic drive• 400:1 total reduction• Rim pull ~ vehicle weight

Page 9: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 9

Agile suspension

• Passive matching of terrain• Large stroke for terrain

approaching wheel diameter in size

• Steady platform for sensing

Page 10: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 10

Agile suspension

Twist course video

Page 11: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 11

Underbody shape

Maintains 30 cm belly clearance with a wheel on 30 cm positive obstacles

Keeps drill tip closest to ground when kneeling

30 cm 30 cm

Page 12: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 12

Lowering drill

• Major benefit for drill system

• Sensors inspect site prior to kneeling

• Scarab poses with belly just above ground

Page 13: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 13

Pose adjustment mechanism

• Raises & lowers by actuating wing angle (independent L & R)• Center link bisects wing angle: enables lift-and-level body averaging• Retains advantages of passive rocker bogie• Many ways to implement

Page 14: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 14

Mobility benefits

• Climbing slopes otherwise unable to• Leaning into cross-slopes for stability• Autonomous body roll leveling• Raising to avoid or recover from high centering• Changing wheelbase in

reaction to periodic terrain

• Inch-worming out of dug-in condition

Page 15: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 15

Scalability

• Body is readily modifiable to suit payloads

• Configuration is scalable in both directions

Page 16: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 16

Specifications

Mass: 280 kg Weight: 460 N 2750 N

Power (driving): 200 W (peak) Power (posing): 380 W (peak) Power (idle): 78 W

Speed: 5.0 cm/s (6.0 cm/s max)

Height (with drill tower): 2.2 m high stance, 1.6 m low stanceWidth (wheelbase): 1.4 mLength (wheelbase): 0.8 - 1.3 m Aspect (track/wheelbase): 1:1 low stance, 1:2 nominal, 1:7 highWheel diameter: 60 cm

Page 17: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

Additional Material

Page 18: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 18

Specifications

CG height: 0.64m nominal, 0.60m low, 0.72m high

Static pitchover: 42° nominal stance, 29° high, 45° low Static rollover: 53° nominal stance, 48° high, 55° low

Maximum / minimum straddle: 57 cm, Belly contact

Approach / departure angle: 105° nominal stanceBreakover angle: 115° nominal stance

Rim pull (single wheel): 2500 NDrawbar pull: 1560 N (medium-coarse grain sand)

Page 19: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 19

Design solution

• Drill implementation– Central location on vehicle to maximize weight for downforce– Direct mounting to chassis– Fixed drill structure

• Reduced actuation• Functions as navigation mast• Simplifies kinematics & mass properties

• Adjustable kinematic suspension– Body roll averaging over terrain– Bring drill to surface to operate– High stiffness platform to react drilling forces

• Skid steering– Reduced actuation– Increased stiffness

• Thermal approach– Utilize heat from radioisotope power supply – Shunt excess heat to radiator surface

Page 20: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 20

Vehicle requirements

• Drill dominated design– Bring drill to surface to operate– High stiffness platform to react forces

• Mobility over rough terrain– 30 cm obstacles– Steep soil slopes

• Environments– Fine, abrasive dust– Vacuum, 40 K ground, 3 K sky

• Power– Radioisotopic power supply

Page 21: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 21

NORCAT coring system

• 1 meter drilling, sampling & processing system– Lab R&D maturity

• Specs– ø30 cm borehole– ø1.5 cm continuous core– ~50 kg– 0.5 m x 0.5 m x 1.5 m volume

• Operations:– Drill to depth– Capture core, transfer– Meter core into pieces– Crush into fines– Transfer to oven

• Issues:– Loads, torques, vibrations– 1500 – 3000 cc cuttings pile

Page 22: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 22

Drill cuttings

cm 10 x cm to up cm 7.5 x cm from Range

cone 35 repose of Angle

cuttings cm 3000 to cm 1400

400% to 200% from factors Expansion

borehole cm 700 depth m borehole, cm

core continuous mm 15 takes drill RESOLVE

drilling faced full assume :Worstcase

33

3

3525

13

∅∅°

=∅

Page 23: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 23

Potential attributes

• Internal actuation: shafts through shoulder & shaft-drive to hubs

• Actuated suspension to surmount extreme obstacle or extricate from twist

• Space-relevant wheels & tread: design, fab, mount• Hosting more of RESOLVE subsystems• Upscale chassis and body-averaging beam• Thermal isolation of cold drill and warm body

Page 24: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 24

Nominal ride height

Page 25: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 25

Nominal ride height

Page 26: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 26

Nominal ride height

Page 27: Scarab Design Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007.

CMU | 13 December 2007 27

JPL Sample-Return Rover

SRR1– 4-wheel skid, rotary actuated

shoulder, differential body pose

SRR2K– 4-wheel steering added