Scaling up HIV testing: the role of self-testing
-
Upload
european-centre-for-disease-prevention-and-control -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
38 -
download
0
Transcript of Scaling up HIV testing: the role of self-testing
Scaling up testingThe role of HIV self-testing
Karen ChampenoisResearch Department,
Maison Blanche Hospital, Paris, France
Definition of HIV self-test
• HIV rapid test performed by the user– Sampling– Process– Interpretation of the result
• Whole / finger-stick blood or oral fluidsample
• Any positive result should be confirmedby another testing according to a national validated algorithm
Source: F. Simon
Test stand
Test DevicePouched Device
Pouched Developer Vial
Stepwise Instructions
Pre & Post-Test Informational Booklet
Package Insert
HIVST available in USA (October 2012)
HIVST – pros & cons: accuracy
Pros• Sensitivity
– Blood test > oral fluid test (96.4%- 98.8%) > (65.0%-97.9%)
• Specificity ~ 100%
• Invalid test (<5%)– Blood test > oral fluid test
Cons• Low sensitivity in early infections
• Window period of 3 months
• Increased rate of false negativetests when people are on ART– Implication for PrEP
Pant Pai et al. Plos One 2013; Figueroa et al. AIDS Conference 2016; Pavie et al. Plos One 2010; Suntharasamai et al. Plos one 2015
HIVST – pros & cons: acceptability
Pros• High acceptability up to 98%
• Preference– HIVST > conventional testing– Oral fluid > blood sample
• Confidentiality, convenience, immediacy
Cons• Remaining concerns
– Lack of counseling– Risk of handling error– Test reliability
Pant pai et al. Plos One 2013; Figueroa et al. AIDS Behav 2015; Greacen et al. AIDS care 2012
HIVST – pros & cons: side effects
Pros• Enhance autonomy,
empowerment– Controling one’s health choice– Reducing at risk behaviour
• Reduce barriers as stigma
Cons• Self-harm• Uncertain access to information,
counseling and care
• Social harm– Intimate partner violence– Coercive testing
Figueroa et al. AIDS Behav 2015; Brown et al. AIDS Behav 2014; Carballo-Diéguez et al. AIDS and Behav 2012
HIVST – pros & cons: access
Pros• Large availability
– Pharmacies– Internet– Over the counter approaches
• Privacy
Cons• Actual accessibility• Internet : numerous tests of
questionable quality
• Price– €28 / £30 / US$40≠ socially vulnerable populations
Figueroa et al. AIDS Behav 2015; Myers et al. AIDS Behav 2016;
Values and preferences of key populations in France
• MSM– Accuracy and reliability of tests. Preference for blood-based HIVST– HIVST as a prevention tool (repeated testing), used in a context of risk behaviour
• Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa– Security for using HIVST– Benefit to know HIV status and free access to care regardless the administrative
situation– Communication tool adapted (color, shape, …)
• PWID– Implication of service providing specific health care and substance misuse
community organisations
• Transgender people – HIV testing is not the health priority
HIVST: expected to increase uptake and frequency of HIV testing mainly in key populations
Encouraging first results
• In France, MSM the most interested in HIVST were those who‒ live their sexual life with men in the absolute secrecy‒ had never been tested
• In NL, HIVST succeeded in reaching first-time and infrequent testing population
• In USA, using ads on Grindr increased the HIVST uptake in MSM
• In USA and Australia, 2 RCTs showed an increase in testing frequency in MSM in the HIVST arm
• Lack of evidence remains‒ Reduction of the time period between infection and diagnosis‒ Linkage to care after a HIVST in high income country
Greacen et al. AIDS Care 2012; Zuure et al. AIDS Conference 2016; Huang AIDS Prev 2016; Rosengren et al. Sex Health 2016; Katz et al. IAS 2015; Jamil et al. AIDS conference 2016
As conclusion
• WHO new guidelines
HIV self-testing should be offered as an additional approach to HIV testing services (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence)
Available at http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/vct/hiv-self-testing-guidelines/en/