Sat 3 pm - Converting Waste to Energy - AVICC€¦ · Converting Waste to Energy presented at:...
Transcript of Sat 3 pm - Converting Waste to Energy - AVICC€¦ · Converting Waste to Energy presented at:...
15-‐04-‐23
1
Converting Waste to Energy presented at: Association of Vancouver Island & Coastal Communities AGM and Convention
11 April, 2015 Courtenay, BC
Waste to Energy
• Thermal Systems: • Thermal Treatment or Conditioning • Conversion Technologies • Mass Burn Combustion • Gasification, Pyrolysis, • Or just plain – Incineration
• Biological Systems • Anaerobic digestion • Landfill gas recovery
• The role of waste to energy (WTE) • How WTE works • What does it cost? • Environmental and health impacts
• Common myths
• Questions and discussion
What we will talk about today
3 4
• 4th R - Recovery of energy and materials after the first 3Rs, prior to disposal
Where does WTE fit in?
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle
Recovery
Residuals
The role of WTE in an Integrated System
• With recycling and organics treatment:
Recycling
Landfill Landfill
ThermalTreatment
OrganicTreatment
How Thermal WTE works
• Technologies offer different ways of releasing the energy in the waste
• Conventional WTE systems are essentially power plants using waste as fuel instead of natural gas or wood
• Advanced WTE systems use heat to convert the energy in the waste into a gas that can be burned for power, or converted to fuel (for burning)
15-‐04-‐23
2
Conventional waste to energy
Electricity
Combustion Energy RecoveryFeedstockPreparation Flu Gas Cleaning
Bottom Ash Fly Ash
Exhaust
(60160 Waste to Energy 14Feb06.vsd)
Steam Heating
Advanced thermal technologies: gasification/pyrolysis
Electricity
Gasification orPyrolysis Syngas CleaningFeedstock
Preparation Energy Recovery
Char / Ash
Exhaust
Gas Turbineor Recip.Engine
Steam
Residue /Ash
(60160 Waste to Energy Pyrolysis 14Feb06.vsd)
Burnaby, BC Mass Burn Facility (280,000 T/a) Wainwright WTE (10,000 T/a)
• Showing the process steam line for energy utilization
Gasification Plant in Edmonton 80,000 T/a
Page 11
• Anaerobic Digestion (AD) • Bacteria degrade organics and form methane • Methane is captured and cleaned • Can be burned as fuel, or • Upgraded to natural gas quality (to be used as fuel)
Biological WTE
12
15-‐04-‐23
3
Anaerobic Process
Organics separated from waste stream
Pulping and decontamin-ation of feedstock
Material fed into reactor
Biogas recovered from reactor
Digestate removed from reactor
Solids dewatered
Energy recovery
Aerobic composting
Liquid fraction recycled
AD Pictures
14
Bioreactor Landfill
Page 15
Courtesy SSWM
Energy Comparison
16
Potential kWh per tonne of waste
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Thermal WTE Gasifica>on WTE
Anaerobic Diges>on Bioreactor Landfill
Waste Diversion Potential
• Thermal WTE • Takes 100% of
residual waste after recycling • 75% converted to
energy • 25% to landfill as ash
• Biological WTE • Takes 35 – 40% of
waste (Organic part) • 60% to 65% still goes
to landfill • About half of the
diverted organics become compost
• The rest goes towards making energy
17
Landfill Reduction
18
What still goes to landfill in % by weight
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Thermal WTE Gasifica>on WTE Anaerobic Diges>on Bioreactor Landfill
15-‐04-‐23
4
Cost comparison
19
$ per tonne comparative estimates, including capital repayment
0
50
100
150
Thermal WTE Gasifica>on WTE Anaerobic Diges>on Bioreactor Landfill
Economies of Scale for Thermal WTE
20
Courtesy Ramboll (developed for York – Durham)
Long term WTE costs versus Landfill
21
Environmental Issues
• Air emissions • Emission standards more stringent than for most
wood fired power plants or industrial boilers • In Europe, air emissions from WTE considered
irrelevant compared to industry and transportation • Residues from thermal systems
• Bottom ash generally safe to dispose in landfill or use as cover
• Fly ash (5%) needs to be stabilized before landfilling • AD residue is compost, which can be land applied
Dioxin Emissions in the USA
Source: (P. Deriziotis, MS Thesis, Columbia University, 2003; data by U.S. EPA)
Reduction of Mercury from WTE in the USA
Source: Waste-to- Energy Research and Technology Council (WTERT)
15-‐04-‐23
5
Comparing GHG Emissions
Tonnes CO2e Reduced per Tonne Material Handled
-0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
Steel Paper Plastics Yard &Garden
FoodScraps
Yard &Garden
FoodScraps
ResidualWaste
ThermalTreatment
Tonn
es
Recycling
Composting Anaerobic Digestion
GHG Emissions from Thermal Electricity Production
0
500
1000
Coal Natural Gas(CCGT)
MSW BC EnergyIntensity
CO
2e e
mis
sion
s (k
g/M
Wh)
• Thermal WTE has no future • False: there are 800 plants worldwide and over 400
in Europe, with many new ones on the way • Thermal WTE will reduce recycling
• False; those countries with the highest WTE also have the highest recycling
• WTE will eliminate the need for landfills • False: landfills will be needed for ash, for downtime
and to handle growth
Myths – true or false
27
• Revenues from WTE can pay for everything and put money back into the community • False: Capital and operating costs are too high to be
fully offset by energy revenues • Emerging technologies carry a high risk
• True: Many promises are made, but most cannot deliver. See Plasco example
• Thermal systems can cause health issues • False: Modern systems have not been linked to
health issues
Myths (continued 2)
28
• WTE is too expensive for smaller communities: • True: In most cases, maximized recycling and landfill
will be less costly (if landfill capacity is available) • AD is growing worldwide and pays for itself:
• False: AD plant construction in Europe has slowed to a crawl because subsidies have been reduced.
• Current energy prices are hurting WTE projects • True: Even large scale plants need good energy
revenues to keep tipping fees reasonable
Myths (continued 3)
29
• WTE facilities will never be sited anywhere close to anyone • False: see location of WTE plant in downtown Paris
Myths (continued 4)
30
15-‐04-‐23
6
THANK YOU QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION