Sample Clock Offset Detection and Correction in the LTE ... · Presentation Overview • OFDM...

Elliot Briggs1, Chunmei Kang2,

Amit Mane2, Dan McLane2, Brian Nutter1

SDR’11 - WinnComm Europe

Brussels, Belgium June 22nd – 24th

Sample Clock Offset Detection and

Correction in the LTE Downlink Receiver

1: Texas Tech University, 2: Innovative Integration

Presentation Overview

• OFDM Receiver Synchronization Basics

• Mechanics of Sample Clock Offset

• Sample Clock Offset Detection

• Developed Sample Clock Correction Technique

• Results

1

OFDM Receiver Synchronization Basics

IDF

T

…

Para

llel to

Serial

…

D/A

Com

ple

x s

ym

bols

TX

Sample

clock

Add CP

~

Freq. offset

* WGN

channel A/D

RX

Sample

clock Serial to

Para

llel

Remove CP …

DF

T

Single/Multiple

path delay

…

Com

ple

x s

ym

bols

Signal Impairments

Traditional OFDM model example:

Impairments:

• AWGN: weak (noisy) signal

• Frequency shift: errors in RF electronics (TX and RX)

• Delay: Asynchronous startup time, multiple paths

• Sample Clock Offset?

2

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

FFT bin center positions at the Receiver (subcarrier index)

Ideal Orthogonal Reception


Ideal OFDM Reception:

•The receiver’s FFT bins are

aligned with each subcarrier

• Here, at the receiver, each

subcarrier is orthogonal to the

others

3


-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1


Reception with ICI from 20% Frequency Shift

OFDM Reception Affected by

Frequency shift:

• Each FFT bin is misaligned by

an equal amount

• Each received subcarrier

experiences the same amount

of ICI

4


-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1


Reception with ICI from 5% Sample Clock Offset

OFDM Reception Affected by

Sample Clock Offset:

• Each FFT bin has a

cumulative amount of shift

• The outer subcarrier positions

experience the most ICI

5


0 256 512 768 1024 1280 1536 1792 20480

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

subcarrier index

norm

aliz

ed m

agnitude

LTE signal with 1,229 Hz sample clock offset at the receiver (40ppm total)

• 40 ppm error at the receiver

simulates the maximum error from 20

ppm clock oscillators at the

transmitter and receiver

• 40ppm = 1.229 kHz , 8.2% of one

subcarrier spacing

• Here, the SNR is 50 dB before the

sampling clock error is added

6


-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

real

imagin

ary


-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

realim

agin

ary


• A slight phase shift occurs from

fractional timing offset

• The outer subcarrier positions

are no longer orthogonal and

contain energy from neighboring

subcarriers

• After the phase is unwound,

only the ICI component remains

• The ICI appears as noise at the

outer subcarrier locations

7


1 200 400 600 800 1000 12000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

subcarrier index

degra

dation (

dB

)

SNR Degradation vs. Subcarrier Index at Es/No = 50 dB

1 ppm

5 ppm

10 ppm

20 ppm

• ICI causes SNR degradation

which is the most severe at the

outer subcarrier locations.

• Even a 5ppm sample clock error

can cause 6 dB of degradation

when Es/No = 50 dB

2610 10

3

11log10 s

o

sn fn

N

ED

8

[1]


5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

10-1

100

101

102

clock offset (ppm)

degra

dation (

dB

)

SNR Degradation vs. SCO at Varying Es/No (subcarrier index = 1200)

20 dB

30 dB

40 dB

50 dB

• The level of degradation is

displayed for several levels of

SNR

• The SNR is adversely affected,

even with modest clock offsets

9

Mechanics of Sample Clock Offset

… …

time

symbol duration Cyclic prefix duration

LTE Example:

• “Extended” cyclic prefix mode

• 20 MHz mode

• Ideally, each symbol lasts only 83.33 μs

Transmitted OFDM symbols:

MHz72.301sT

512CPN

2048FFTN

μs33.83sFFTCPsymbol TNNT

CP CP CP

10

[2]

Mechanics of Sample Clock Offset

… …

sampled time

Received OFDM symbols:

perfect sample clock

frequency:

sample clock frequency

is too fast: … …

… … sample clock frequency

is too slow:

μs33.83sFFTCPsymbol TNNT

errors fT /1MHz72.301• 2560 samples will take a longer or shorter amount

of time for the receiver to collect, depending on the

offset conditions

• The rate that the symbols drift from the perfect

case directly indicates the sampling clock offset

magnitude.

• The direction in which the symbols drift indicate

the sampling clock offset direction

CP CP CP

CP CP CP

CP CP CP

11

Sample Clock Offset Detection

Any DFT-based OFDM system must have an FFT window

timing synchronization component to properly align the

FFT window

… …

FFT window t-2 FFT window t-1 FFT window t

time

CP CP CP

Any FFT timing synchronization method can give sample clock offset information

• Using the LTE Primary Synchronization Signal (PSS)

o Timing information provided every 5 ms

• Cyclic Prefix Correlation

oTiming information provided every 83.33 μs

12


Example: (-)+100 Hz clock offset error:

• Generates (removes) 100 extra samples per second.

• This will generate (remove) 1 sample for after 120 OFDM

symbols, or 0.0083 samples to each symbol

• A +12 kHz clock offset will generate an entire sample for

each OFDM symbol

N

t

offsetoffseterror tnStnSN

nf1

]1[][000,12

][

13

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

x 104

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Symbol Start Location with Respect to the RX Clock (600 Hz SCO @ RX)

symbol index

sym

bol sta

rt s

am

ple

index


Hz 60005.000,12]1[][000,12

][1

N

t

offsetoffseterror tnStnSN

nf

-2 -1 0 1 20

2

4

6

8

10

12x 10

4 timing drift distribution

symbol-to-symbol timing offset difference

frequency

000,135Nn

05.

14

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

OFDM Symbol Index

fractional dela

y (

fractional sam

ple

s)

Fractional Delay Modulation to Compensate a 600 Hz SC Error

Underflow Underflow

• SCO can be corrected if the signal is

resampled at the correct sampling rate

• Modulate the fractional delay value at

every sample to effectively resample the

signal

• When the fractional delay value

over/underflows, repeat/skip a sample


15

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

OFDM Symbol Index

fractional dela

y (

fractional sam

ple

s)

Fractional Delay Modulation to Compensate a 600 Hz SC Error

Underflow Underflow

• In this example, each sample has a

-.05/2560 delay difference from the

previous sample to correct the .05/2560

from the sample clock offset.

• When a negative delay is requested, a

sample is skipped.

• Here, fewer samples are produced at

the output of the resampling filter than

are input

• Ideally, the resampler produces 2560

samples per 83.33 μs

• The signal should have stationary

symbol timing after resampling

Developed Sample Clock Correction Technique

The resampler “compresses” the signal

by continuously reducing the delay for

each sample

1 16


• The ML timing and frequency offset estimator [3] uses the cyclic prefix

o The timing estimate is used by the loop filter and to trigger an FFT

conversion

o The frequency offset estimate is used to correct residual frequency shift

1 17


• The receiver uses feedback correction to adjust the symbol timing and

frequency correction

• The timing loop filter averages many timing estimates to get an average

window drift rate, just as in the previous example

• The delay accumulator constantly accumulates fractional delay and modulates

a fractional resampling filter

18

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 4016

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

40FPGA Hardware Results - 40 ppm SCO compensation performance

channel Es/No (dB)

measure

d e

ffective E

s/N

o (

dB

)

perfect reception, no SCO

40 ppm SCO, no compensation

40 ppm SCO, with compensation

• Design implemented in an

X5-400M FPGA board by

Innovative Integration

• Two separate clocks are

used, the frequency difference

is measured

• With SCO compensation

enabled, the minimum SNR

gain is around 3 dB

• SNR gains increase at higher

values of Es/No (~ 6 dB)!

FPGA Hardware Implementation Results

1 19


22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 405

10

15

20

25

30

35

40FPGA Hardware Results - 100 ppm SCO compensation performance

channel Es/No (dB)

measure

d e

ffective E

s/N

o (

dB

)

perfect reception, no SCO

100 ppm SCO, no compensation

100 ppm SCO, with compensation

• A hidden advantage to this

correction technique exists

• CP correlation reliability is

reduced when the sampling

clock changes a significant

amount in a single symbol

duration

• Without SCO correction, the

timing synchronization fails

• With SCO correction, the SNR

values are almost identical to the

40 ppm case at 100 ppm

• The algorithm has been tested

to track as much as a 7.5 kHz

sample clock error (~250 ppm)!

20


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1610

-3

10-2

10-1

100

400M, 16QAM, SCO=0KHz, CFO=100KHz

Es/No

BE

R

measured BER

theoretical BER

• CFO = 100 kHz : frequency shift of over 13 subcarrier spacings

• SCO = 7.5 kHz : ~250 ppm sampling clock offset

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010

-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

400M, QPSK, SCO=7.5KHz, CFO=100KHz

Es/No

BE

R

measured BER

theoretical BER

21


Corner Cases:

• Maintains timing lock down to 3dB SNR

• Maintains receivability:

o LTE cell ID decode, frame sync successful

SNR = 5dB

CFO = ±75 kHz (± 5 subcarrier spacings)

SCO = ±4 kHz (±133.33 ppm)

22

• The developed SCO measurement and correction method

allows the LTE user equipment to be equipped with a lower

cost, less precise sample clock source.

• Any timing synchronization algorithm can be employed to

generate sample clock offset measurements to be used for

correction

• The measurement and correction is in the time domain,

so the algorithm is agnostic to any frequency domain

information (reference symbols, training, etc).

• Can be applied to any OFDM-based standard

Conclusions

23

• May be useful for surveillance applications, maximizes

OFDM signal reception quality for any OFDM signal

Conclusions

24

References

[1] T. Pollet, P. Spruyt, and M. Moeneclaey, "The BER performance of OFDM systems using

non-synchronized sampling," Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications

Conference (GLOBECOM'94), San Francisco, USA, November 1994, pp. 253-257.

[2] 3GPP TS 36.211 V8.9.0 “Physical Channels and Modulation”. Rel. 8.

[3] J.J. van de Beek, M. Sandell, P.O. Börjesson, "ML Estimation of Time

and Frequency Offset in OFDM Systems," IEEE Transactions on Signal

Processing, Vol. 45, No. 7, July 1997, pp. 1800 - 1805.

Sample Clock Offset Detection and Correction in the LTE ... · Presentation Overview • OFDM...

Documents

Transcript of Sample Clock Offset Detection and Correction in the LTE ... · Presentation Overview • OFDM...