Argo - NOAA National Marine Sanctuaries: Oceans, Marine Life
Safe Sanctuaries 2005 NOAA Emergency Response A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board
description
Transcript of Safe Sanctuaries 2005 NOAA Emergency Response A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board
Safe Sanctuaries 2005 NOAA Emergency Response
A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board
Dr. Robert PaviaNOAA’s National Ocean Service
August 8, 2005
Outline
• Purpose
• Issues
• Presentation of Briefing
• NOAA Coordination and Views
• Desired Outcomes
Purpose
Respond to the SAB request for “an example of NOAA strategic thinking about disaster planning.”
Provide an opportunity for discussing how the lessons learned relate to possibilities for NOAA strategic disaster planning.
Disasters
Natural and technological disasters cause an estimated $52 billion in damages
each year in the United States
National Science and Technology Council,
Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction
Issues
Organizational– How do we effectively organize to implement
National Response Plan requirements and other NOAA disaster response mandates?
Technical– What level of integration should we strive for?– How do we identify and establish research priorities?– What are the most critical research to operations
issues?
Strategic– How do we develop legislative and budget strategies
for infrequent, high consequence disasters?
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
NOAA Responds to Disasters (Emergencies)
• Extreme Weather Events • Oil and Chemical Spills• Marine Animal Strandings• Vessel Groundings• Harmful Algal Blooms• Hazards to Navigation• Tsunamis• National Special Security• Coral Disease/ Bleaching• Natural Resource Damage
NOAA responds because of our stewardship mandates and our scientific expertise. – Data;– Observations;– Forecasts; and – Technical experts.
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
The Scenario: On April 18, 2005 at 2200 EDT, an 800-foot cargo vessel, M/V Portsmith Trader carrying 1,200,000 gallons of fuel ran aground near Elbow Reef in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. The vessel injures both ecological and historical resources, has two releases of oil, and potentially unstable cargo.
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Track of Portsmith Trader
Sanctuary Boundary
Florida KeysNational Marine Sanctuary
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Demonstrate NOAA human and technological capabilities and ability to integrate and communicate.
Exercise NOAA response plans, protocols and procedures for deploying technical capabilities and expertise.
Build relationships that foster long-term collaboration on incident response.
Provide training in emergency response, incident command system, Hazwopper and field safety.
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Sanctuaries Personnel / Vessels
Pollution Trajectory Modeling
Navigation Response Team
Resource Assessment Teams
Historical Resource Specialists
Portable Meteorological Station
Oceanographic Buoy
Hi-Frequency Radar
Drift Cards & Dye Pills
NOAA Bell 212 Helicopter
Assets/Technology People/Organizations
NOS, NWS, NESDIS, NMFS, OMAO, HSPO, GC, PAO
U.S. Coast Guard,Miami/ Key West
State of Florida, DEP and FWCC
Monroe County
Titan Marine
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Lessons– Exercises are a decisive opportunity for NOAA to
understand operational approach, capabilities, limitations, support requirements, and methods of interactions.
– The exercise scale and complexity provided an opportunity for integrating across NOAA programs not possible with a smaller exercise or one lead by another organization.
– Safety training, safety protocols, and the on-scene safety organization require a comprehensive and integrated NOAA plan for emergency response.
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Lessons (continued)
– Use of real weather and oceanographic conditions significantly contributed to the experience of participants and the lessons learned from the exercise.
– Fully exploiting the development of geo-spatial data requires that NOAA programs develop or adopt common standards, data structures, data interchange, and data display protocols.
Safe Sanctuaries 2005
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
Federal Context– National Science and Technology
Council: Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction
– National Response Plan/National Incident Management System
– GEOSS (IOOS)
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
Linkages to IOOS – Identify observing system requirements and gaps for
emergency response operations;
– Develop rapid deployment capabilities to supplement the national backbone;
– Designate National Marine Sanctuaries as sentinel sites;
– Integrate data streams across disciplines, institutions, time scales, and locations;
– Couple operational models with observations, develop ensemble models; and
– Develop a Common Operational Picture for environmental conditions.
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
The NOAA Homeland Security Program– Develops and maintains continuity of
NOAA’s Priority Mission Essential Functions and the supporting activities and capabilities;
– Coordinates and interfaces with Dept. of Homeland Security.
Strategic Disaster Preparedness
The NOAA Emergency Response Program – Provides integrated NOAA information and
support for emergency response;
– Supports effective NOAA responses to hazards threatening life, property or the environment through training for,integrating, evaluating, and improving NOAA response.
NOAA Coordination and Views
– Actively engaging external partners, including research partners;
– Continuing integration across NOAA;– Addressing research requirements
and research to operations gaps;– Integrating products & services; and– Developing new end-to-end capabilities.
Desired Outcomes
– Provide the SAB an example of NOAA strategic thinking about disaster planning.
– SAB recommendations on ways to build on successful SS2005.
– Open discussion with SAB on organizational, technical and strategic issues.
End of Presentation
Issues
• Organizational– How do we effectively organize to implement National
Response Plan requirements and other NOAA disaster response mandates?
• Technical– What level of integration for which we should strive?– How do we formally identify and establish research
priorities?– What are the most critical research to operations issues?
• Strategic– How do we develop legislative and budget strategies for
infrequent, high consequence disasters?