S02V02P01 - APP · capital investment forecast and operations Develop and execute a strategy for...
Transcript of S02V02P01 - APP · capital investment forecast and operations Develop and execute a strategy for...
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL® Company
(U 338-E)
2015 General Rate Case APPLICATION
Workpapers
Human Resources (HR)HR Benefits and Other Compensation SCE-06 Volume 02, P art 01 Chapter IV-V
N ovem ber 2013
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
IV.
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVES - RESULTS SHARING
A. Summary of Test Year Request
SCE forecasts Results Sharing expenses of $147.86 million for Test Year 2015. Figure IV-1
below shows recorded and adjusted costs for FERC Accounts 500, 588, 905 and 920/921 for the 2008
2012 plan years, plus forecast costs for the years 2013 through 2015. The total forecast includes the
costs for: (1) Results Sharing, an incentive pay program for exempt and non-exempt (including union-
represented) employees, (2) the Management Incentive Program (MIP), an incentive pay program for
senior managers (approximately 10 percent of all employees), and (3) the Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan (EIC) costs for those executives who are not officers (less than one percent of the
employee population).34
WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 75-82
WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 83-90 IV-1
■WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 91-95
Results Sharino - A ll FERC Accounts Recorded and Adjusted 2008-2012/Forecast 2013-2015
FERC Accounts 500, 588, 905, and 920/921(Constant 2012 $000)
WP SCE 06, Vo . 2, Pt. 1, pp. as follows:
33,U/b______43, U f 4________4B.3Z3______ 43,03f______ bQ.tJZI114.500 137,811 141.787 141.358 174,75
p. 71 p. 70 p. 69 p. 68 p. 67
34 EIC for executive officers is discussed in Exhibit SCE-06, Vol. 01.p. 66
16
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
B. Program Description and Scope
Results Sharing is the annual variable pay program that provides employees an opportunity to
earn a cash bonus based on achieving Company and Operating Unit (OU) goals. The design of the
Results Sharing program is established each calendar year by SCE’s senior executive management team.
Results Sharing helps employees to focus on activities that have an impact - both direct and indirect -
on the Company's success. Results Sharing provides variable pay based on achievement of goals related
to customer service, system reliability, public and workplace safety, cost control, and productivity that
employees help create. The program highlights what is important for employees to do to contribute to
the Company’s successful operations and provides a financial stake for employees to achieve Company
and OU goals that align with ratepayer interests.
Through 2012, the design of the Results Sharing program was focused on the achievement of:
(1) Company goals, (2) the Company operations and maintenance (O&M) budget, (3) OU goals, and (4)
OU O&M budget. It was a combination of the achievement of Company goals, Company O&M budget
performance, and the budget authorized by the 2012 GRC that determined the available pool of dollars
allocated to each OU. Fifty percent of the award was subject to adjustment based on the achievement of
OU goals and O&M budget. The remaining 50 percent was not adjusted based on performance against
OU goals and O&M budget. For MIP and EIC participants, the entire award amount was further
adjusted based on individual performance.
Table IV-2 below depicts Company Goals included in the Results Sharing program for 2012:
17
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION3
Table IV-2Company Goals Included in Results Sharing Program
2012 Plan Year
SAFETY
COMPLIANCE
OPERATIONAL AND SERVICE
EXCELLENCE
STRATEGICIN IT IA T IV E S
PUBLIC PO LIC Y
ENTERPRISE RISK
M ANAGEM ENT
PEOPLE AND
CULTURE
FINANCIALPERFORMANCE
Improve workplace safety to achieve injury free workplace No serious injuries to the public resulting from system failures
Build and maintain a comprehensive company-wide Ethics and Compliance program with an emphasis on strengthening a culture of compliance_____________________________________________________
Customer SatisfactionMaintain Service Delivery Satisfaction Maintain Customer Favorability
ReliabilityMaintain Power Delivery customer satisfaction and reliability performance Effectively manage Power Supply operations
SONGSAchieve targets for INPO performance indicator index and (18 Month rolling average) capability factor Achieve SONGS Regulatory Performance Goal
Major Capital ProjectsMaintain major projects within currently committed scope, schedule and budget, subject to approved changes, and successfully withstand any challenges to full cost recovery Obtain regulatory approval for the revised cost cap for Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP) that reflects final engineering costs and for Devers Colorado River (DCR) updated cost estimates, as appropriate
DBE Spend■ Provide sufficient opportunities to increase purchases of materials and services with Diverse Business
EnterprisesSuccessfully implement Rate Challenge program that produces a system average rate per kilowatt hour in line with targetAchieve a final 2012 General Rate Case decision, at the earliest possible date, consistent with SCE’s capital investment forecast and operationsDevelop and execute a strategy for educating state policymakers, stakeholders and customers about the costs of public policy programs and their impact on ratesImplement competitive principles to ensure acceptable CAISO Tariff Filing for 3rd Party Transmission Providers requiring the 3rd party transmission providers to bear an appropriate share of risks consistent with FERC Order 1000Ensure effective policy decisions and related communication to advocate for fair and equitable rules to minimize the costs of SCE's procurement portfolio, renewable integration and grid reliability costs_______
Enterprise Risk Management Program■ Strengthen comprehensive company-wide Enterprise Risk Management program with an emphasis on
the company's risk management culture and mitigation practicesBusiness Resiliency■ Advance Edison's ability to rapidly respond and manage through business disruptions and catastrophic
eventsStrengthen pay for performance objectives by increasing the differentiation of bonus and stock awardsImprove representation o f ethnic minorities and females across executive populationImplement improvement plans to address areas of weakness identified by work environment reviews
Achieve the core earnings target *Obtain a 2013 cost o f capital decision by December 31, 2012 that retains the key elements of the existing cost of capital mechanism, and provides a compensatory authorized Return on Equity
*RS excludes SCE Company Earning Per Share (EPS) goal.
The process for establishing Company and OU goals, and determining results under the Results
Sharing program is as follows. Around the middle of each year, the Company begins to identify the
business priorities for the following calendar year, and starts to develop corporate goals accordingly.
Individual OUs also establish the OU goals to be included in the Results Sharing program and
performance targets for the coming year. Progress towards Company and OU goals is reviewed during
18
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
the course of the year, usually on a quarterly basis.35 In January and February of the following year,
goal achievements for the previous year are reviewed and final performance is determined.
OU leaders are required to certify the accuracy of the performance results being reported by their
respective department(s). In addition, year-end results and goal performance must be certified by the
OU leader before the results can be forwarded onto the Board of Directors for review at that level.
Beginning in performance year 2013, the Results Sharing plan design changed to place more
focus on achievement of OU goals directly aligned to the Company operational and service excellence
framework and associated ratepayer benefits and to emphasize employee contributions at an individual
performance level.36 In performance year 2013, 100 percent of the funded award is subject to
adjustment based on performance against OU goals. In addition, for all exempt, non-represented
participants, the entire award amount is further subject to adjustment based on individual performance.
The Management Incentive Program (MIP) is based on the same Company goals included in the
Results Sharing program, but adds an individual performance modifier for greater individual
accountability and allows for higher potential payouts.37 For performance year 2012, MIP was revised
to provide a different bonus target for a select group of senior managers who report to company
executives. Some senior managers received an enhanced bonus target while others’ bonus target
remained unchanged. The increased funding for some of the senior managers bonuses was based on
market data for those positions via benchmarking by a third party consultant. Prior to the 2012 MIP
change, the total compensation for MIP-eligible employees also included long-term incentives in the
form of deferred stock units with a three-year vesting requirement. This group of MIP-eligible
employees last received deferred stock grants in 2009 and any payout for this grant occurred in January
2012 (subject to the vesting condition). Therefore, the MIP-eligible employees who received an
enhanced bonus target in connection with the 2012 MIP change coincided with the elimination of
payouts from the deferred stock grants dating back to 2009 and were intended to keep their
compensation at market.
35 Typically, the individual performance standard or metric is developed for each goal to monitor progress and to determine final results at the end of the calendar year.
36 Additional detail regarding the 2013 Results Sharing/MIP programs can be found in the workpapers for this Exhibit.
37 The bonus for performance year 2012 was paid out to employees in first quarter o f 2013. Additional detail regarding the 2012 MIP program can be found in the workpapers for this Exhibit.
\ |WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 75-82
19
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
192021222324
25
26
27
28
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION5
This exhibit also includes short-term incentive program costs for executives who are not officers.
These non-officer executives are eligible for the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EIC), which is
based on a set of measurable, challenging Company performance goals approved by the Board of
Directors. These goals include the specific targets of the Results Sharing program that improve value
for the ratepayer and are stressed at all levels of the Company. The executives’ performance is
evaluated based on their ability to lead their teams to successful attainment of these goals.38
C. Ratemaking Policy
Our Test Year forecast for the Results Sharing program - including MIP (for senior managers)
and EIC (only for non-officer executive-related costs) - requests recovery from customers of the full
costs of the program. SCE’s request is consistent with the Commission’s decision in three of the last
four general rate cases, D.04-07-22, D.06-05-016, and D.09-03-025. In its 2012 decision (D.12-11-051),
the Commission determined it was appropriate that ratepayers fund 90 percent of the Company’s
employee short-term incentive pay program.
In SCE’s 2009 GRC, the Commission approved full funding for the Results Sharing program
based upon the results of the Total Compensation Study. In its decision, the Commission stated that the
Total Compensation Study provides a basis for determining the level of compensation required to attract
and retain employees, but does not serve as a basis to address the overall reasonableness of
compensation or recovery by ratepayers:
The Study addresses the narrow issue of whether SCE’s total compensation package is consistent with other similar companies.. .Although the Study does not address the issue of whether SCE’s compensation is ‘reasonable’ or who should bear the costs of this total compensation, e.g., shareholders or ratepayers, the study does provide a basis for assessing the reasonableness of the compensation offered by SCE in terms of what is necessary to attract and retain qualified employees3
The purpose of a total compensation study is to determine how a utility’s compensation
compares to the market. If the total compensation is found to be at market levels, it should be
considered reasonable and therefore recoverable from ratepayers based on standard cost of service
ratemaking principles. If the overall level of total compensation is deemed reasonable, it stands to
38 Additional detail reeardine the EIC program can be found in the workpapers for this Exhibit.
WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 91-95
20
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
reason that ratepayers should be indifferent re: the mix of pay and benefits comprising the total
compensation.
There are several reasons why customers should continue supporting employee variable pay
programs. As variable pay is an important element of an overall total compensation package, provided
to employees for services rendered, it is a legitimate business expense that should be recovered in cost of
service-based rates. Moreover, variable pay is an “at-risk” component of total compensation that orients
employees’ efforts toward the customer-focused operational priorities of the Company, such as
providing quality customer service.
D. Results Sharing Goals Benefit Ratepayers
The Results Sharing program gives employees a financial stake in achieving SCE’s objectives by
focusing employee efforts on achieving operational goals which, in turn, provide value to the ratepayers.
As reflected by Table IV-2 above, the Company goals are overwhelmingly tied to matters benefiting
ratepayers with a heavy focus on customer satisfaction, public and workplace safety, system reliability,
infrastructure improvements, rate equity and mitigation efforts, workforce and supplier diversity, and
programs to rapidly respond to business disruptions or catastrophic events. The goals related to cost
control and productivity directly benefit ratepayers since achievement of these goals enhances the value
obtained by ratepayers through rates and allows for greater investment in system reliability and safety.
Notably, except for EIC participants, the Company goal tied to core earnings is not considered in
assessing annual short-term incentive awards for all other SCE employees (namely, all Results Sharing
and MIP participants).
E. Test Year 2015 Request for Results Sharing (FERC Accounts 500, 588, 905, and 920/921)
1. Description of Accounts
In Test Year 2015, HR will record costs for the Results Sharing program in FERC
Accounts 500 (for expenses incurred in the general supervision and direction of the operation of steam
power generating stations), 588 (for expenses incurred in distribution system operation not provided for
elsewhere), 905 (for miscellaneous customer accounts expenses not provided for in other accounts), and
920/921 (for administrative and general salaries and office supplies and expenses). The Results Sharing
program costs are recorded in the Results Sharing Memorandum Account.40
40 See Exhibit SCE-10, Vol. 1, for additional detail on the operation of the Results Sharing Memorandum Account.
21
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION7
2. Analysis of Recorded Data
A combination of factors, including the number of eligible employees, target award
levels, labor expense, and Company and OU performance, drives Results Sharing program costs. As
depicted in Figure IV-1 above, Results Sharing program costs fluctuated between the recorded years
2008 through 2012. Costs in 2009 rose by approximately 24 percent due to a 6 percent increase in the
number of employees receiving awards and the number of employees in the MIP program. In 2009,
there was also slightly better than target performance and funding compared to 2008. Costs remained
relatively stable in 2010 and 2011. Costs increased again in 2012, due primarily to a better than target
performance and funding.2, Pt.1, pp. 663. Test Year 2015 Forecast for Results Sharing
We have selected an Itemized Forecast methodology, which incorporates the Company’s
labor forecast. Our Test Year forecast was determined as follows. First, we obtained the historical
Results Sharing program costs for 2012 of $$174.77 million. Then, we calculated the expense ratio
(stated as a percentage) for the program by dividing the 2012 plan costs by the 2012 recorded labor
expense. Finally, since the Results Sharing program costs are directly impacted by our total labor costs,
we then applied the expense ratio to the projected non-capital labor forecast for 2013-2015. 41
As noted in Figure IV-1 above, application of the methodology described above results in
a Test Year 2015 forecast for FERC Accounts 500, 588, 905 and 920/921 of $147.86 million, a 15
percent decrease from 2012 recorded costs. The forecast amount is due primarily to a decrease in the
number of employees and labor costs directly related to the Company’s Operational Excellence
initiatives.42 Unlike the Linear Trending, Averaging, and Last Recorded Year methodologies, the
Itemized Forecast methodology is appropriate because it takes into account the change in the labor
forecast.
41 Forecast calculation can be found in the workpapers for this Exhibit.
42 See Exhibit SCE-06, Vol. 01.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
WP: SCE-06, Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 97-99V.
LONG-TERM I
A. Summary of Test Year Request
SCE forecasts expenses of $18.18 million for long-term incentives related costs in T est Year
2015. The forecast amount pertains to long-term incentives paid to executives. Figure V-2 below,
shows recorded costs for FERC Accounts 920/921 for the 2008-2012 plan years, plus forecast expenses
for the years 2013 through 2015.
Figure V-2 Long Term Incentives
Recorded and Adjusted 2008-2012/Forecast 2013-2015 FERC Accounts 920/921
(Constant 2012 $000)
WP: SCE-06, Vol.B. Program Description and Scope
In order to hire talented executives, many utilities offer long-term incentives (LTI) as a
component of a competitive direct compensation package. Salary, short-term (annual) bonus and
longterm incentives form the three standard elements of direct compensation for utility executives, as
they do for more than 97 percent of U.S. companies with an annual revenue of $10 billion or greater.43
43 According to the 2012 Aon Hewitt Total Compensation Database, 97 percent o f companies with annual revenue of $10 billion or greater surveyed used long-term incentives.
23
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION9
Without the compensation value of LTI (which represents from target values of 24 percent to 53 percent
of SCE executives’ total direct compensation, depending on rank), SCE cannot successfully recruit and
retain highly skilled and experienced executives needed to manage essential Company operations.
Although LTI could be replaced by higher salaries and/or bonuses, such a practice would not be
beneficial to SCE’s customers and business operations. Shifting compensation away from variable pay,
that is LTI, by increasing fixed pay, that is base salary, would result in corresponding increases to
benefit costs since many benefits are based on an executive’s base salary, like pension and 401(k).
Likewise, by shifting compensation away from LTI and toward short term incentives (i.e. annual cash
bonuses), SCE loses a substantial measure of its ability to enhance executive focus on the long term
operational, safety, and productivity goals that benefit ratepayers and the Company as a whole and are
central to the Commission’s basic regulatory objectives.
For the vast majority of SCE’s executives, base salary has stayed relatively constant over the last
few years. In 2011, the percentage of executives receiving no salary increase was 52 percent. In 2012,
this percentage increased to 64 percent. The trend continued in 2013 where now 66 percent of
executives received no increase to their salary. During the same period of time, SCE has continued
providing variable compensation in the form of LTI as well as short-term annual bonuses. With salaries
remaining constant for the majority of executives, the LTI component of their total compensation
package becomes even more vital to the Company’s overall effort to retain our executives to operate the
business.
SCE’s increasing reliance on LTI as a component of the executive’s total compensation package
benefits ratepayers in many ways. Greater retention of key executives is realized since LTI is earned
over multi-year periods. As a variable component of total compensation, SCE can decide from year to
year on how much LTI to grant or whether to not grant LTI at all. SCE has demonstrated good faith in
not inflating base salaries to remain competitive on a total compensation basis. Instead, SCE continues
to believe that the use of LTI is the most prudent direction to take, and more advantageous to the
ratepayers. SCE is not increasing salaries of our executives to compensate for the disallowance of LTI
costs since an increase to base salary would have a direct correlation to an increase in costs of benefits
tied to salary, such as pension and 401(k) benefits.
I f awarded, LTI grants are made annually to SCE executives. Grant levels are based on survey
data on compensation levels and trends, and are intended to form part of a total compensation package
for each position that is at the median of total compensation for that position among utilities (or general
24
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
industry for those positions where SCE competes against the broader labor market). Starting in June
2007, LTI grants to executives have been made under the 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, which was
approved by the shareholders of Edison International in April 2007.
LTI grants to executives consist of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units, and
performance shares. The grant dates for these awards are fixed in advance by the Board of Directors,
which also must approve the values of the grants and the methodology for converting the values into the
number of shares to be granted. The strike prices for stock options are set at the closing price for shares
of Edison International common stock on the grant dates. Options vest 25 percent per year over four
years as long as the executive’s employment with the Company continues.44 Restricted stock units vest
100 percent at the end of three calendar years. Performance shares also vest 100 percent at the end of
three calendar years. Effective with the 2012 grant, two metrics are used for measuring payouts, with
each metric weighted 50 percent. One of the two performance metrics depends on how Edison
International’s three-year total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends) compares to
that of other utilities in the Philadelphia Utility Index. The other performance metric is based on EIX’s
three-year average annual core earnings per share (“EPS”) measured against target levels. The payouts
for each component can range from zero to 200 percent of target. The mix of options, restricted stock
units and performance shares may change from year to year.
C. LTI is a Vital Part of the Market-Competitive “Total Compensation” Package for SCE’s
Executives
Where the total compensation package offered to executives is essentially at market, the amounts
included in that total are what the market pays to attract and retain employees. Since SCE draws its
talent from the same market, SCE must offer similar compensation arrangements to compete for talent.45
It is not logical to agree that SCE’s total compensation is at market levels - that is, the amount the labor
market requires for an employer to attract and retain employees - and then reduce SCE’s total
compensation by eliminating LTI expenses of approximately $18.2 million and contending the reduced
44 Options and other long-term incentive grants have special vesting provisions for death while employed, disability (as defined for purposes o f the grants), retirement at age 65 or later (or at age 61 or later with at least 5 years o f service), and involuntary termination not for cause. Death and disability result in full vesting, while retirement and severance result in special vesting that generally includes some forfeitures.
45 In fact, all o f our Philadelphia Utility Index peer companies grant LTI.
25
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION11
level is still “sufficient to attract and retain employees.”46 Even after the Commission disallowed SCE’s
LTI expenses in the 2012 GRC decision, SCE did not cut executive compensation by eliminating LTI or
reducing 50 percent of short-term executive officer incentives and executive benefits.47 Rather, SCE
continues to maintain that these executive incentives and benefits, including LTI, are essential to keep
its total compensation package market-competitive and attract and retain highly skilled and experienced
executives.
D. SCE’s LTI Program is Necessary for Long-Term Retention of High Performing SCE
Executives Which Benefits Ratepayers
The value of long-term incentives goes beyond the mere compensation value, because they aid in
retention of high-performing executives who focus on the long-term interests of SCE and its customers.
LTI helps SCE retain its executives in two ways. LTI awards vest over three to four years, requiring
executives to remain with the Company in order to vest. They also can offset deficiencies in short-term
compensation that otherwise might result in our losing executives to other companies. As noted earlier
and over the last several years, the vast majority of our executives have not had increases to their base
salary, making LTI an even greater and more important component of their total compensation package.
LTI increases management’s focus on the long-term interests of customers. The ultimate value
realized from LTI depends in part on the market’s assessment of the extent to which executives have
made decisions that will maintain and enhance service delivery, reliability and cost-effectiveness for
customers in the future and thus increase the overall performance of the Company. In some cases,
decisions that are in the long-term interest of customers may have temporary negative effects on
earnings or other factors and executives may as a result receive smaller annual bonuses. For example, as
described earlier in this testimony, upgrading the transmission and distribution system may cause short
term financial strains. However, the prospect of a good payout from the LTI program can support
executives’ determination to act in the long-term best interests of customers. Unlike base salary and
annual bonus, the executive's LTI award for any given year is not truly and fully earned unless that
executive remains continuously employed at SCE for the entire multi-year vesting period.
46 See D.09-03-025, p. 135.
47 SCE’s 2012 GRC decision disallowed costs for 100 percent o f LTI, 50 percent o f short-term incentives for executive officers and 50 percent o f executive benefits. See D.12-11-051, pp. 450 (EIC), 452 (LTI), & 477 (executive benefits).
26
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Over the last few years, SCE has placed greater emphasis on strengthening pay for performance
objectives for executives by increasing the differentiation of bonus and LTI. Based on an evaluation of
an executives performance that is tied to the achievement of Company goals, their LTI grant, as well as
their annual bonus, is determined and may vary significantly from executive to executive. In fact, for
the 2013 LTI awards, 46 percent of the executives received an award above or below target, compared
to 14 percent for the LTI awards made for 2011. The LTI award is tied to the achievement of the
executive’s goals, which are generally tied to SCE’s company goals, namely, operational and service
excellence, safety, compliance, reliability and strategic initiatives.
E. Recovery for LTI in Rates is Consistent with Cost-of-Service Ratemaking Principles
As stated by witness Russell Worden in Chapter III, above, ratepayer recovery for LTI is
consistent with Cost-of-Service Ratemaking Principles. The fundamental premise of cost-of-service
ratemaking, as the Commission itself has stated in a decision quoted earlier, “under cost-of-service
regulation, the utility is entitled to all of its reasonable costs and expenses.”48 Denying ratepayer
funding for the costs of long-term incentives violates this fundamental principle of cost-of-service
ratemaking.49
F. Test Year 2015 Request for Long Term Incentives (FERC Account 920)
1. Description of Account
In Test Year 2015, HR will record costs for LTI in FERC Account 920 for administrative
and general salaries.
2. Analysis of Recorded Data
Between 2009 and 2010, there was an increase in stock price, which resulted in higher
recorded expense for deferred stock units subject to liability accounting. Additionally, there was
increased expected payout for performance shares at the end of 2010 as compared to 2009, which
resulted in higher recorded expense for the awards subject to liability accounting. The decrease in
expenses between 2010 and 2011 was due to no deferred stock units being granted after 2009 and, as a
result, there was no expense for deferred stock units in 2011. Additionally, decreased expected payout
for performance shares at the end of 2011 resulted in lower recorded expense for the awards subject to
liability accounting.
48 D.03-02-03 5, p. 6.
49 See Section III.B, supra, for a more in-depth discussion o f cost-of-service ratemaking principles.
27
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION13
3. Test Year 2015 Forecast for Long Term Incentives FERC Account 920
SCE forecasts expenses of $18.18 million for long-term incentive compensation costs in
Test Year 2015. The forecast amount pertains to long-term incentives granted to executives. Figure V-2
above shows recorded costs for FERC Accounts 920/921 for the 2008-2012 recorded years, plus
forecast costs for the years 2013 through 2015.
Projected 2015 expense of $18.18 million for long-term incentive compensation was
derived using the Itemized Forecast methodology. This methodology was chosen because: (1) 2008
through 2011 LTI expense is higher than we anticipate in the Test Year due to a decreased number of
employees eligible for LTI; and (2) significant turnover in the executive population occurred in 2012
and may continue in our forecast years, resulting in a lower number of anticipated executives eligible for
LTI in Test Year 2015.
The Itemized Forecast methodology selected for the years 2013-2015 was based on (1)
existing grants made in 2010 through 2013; as their expense is recognized in forecast years 2013-2015,
some of these grants have expense recognition beyond test year 2015; (2) projected grants for 2014 and
2015 based on the assumption that the number of grant recipients will not increase in our forecast years;
and (3) expected rates of forfeiture (grants cancelled prior to vesting) based on historical forfeiture rates.
Notably, the projected 2015 expense under this Itemized Forecast methodology is
significantly lower than the expense that would otherwise be derived by applying either the Linear
Trending, Averaging, or Last Recorded Year methodologies.
28
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
2015 General Rate Case - APPLICATION INDEX OF WORKPAPERS
EXHIBIT SCE-06, Volume 2, Part 1, Ch. IV-V
DOCUMENT PAGE(S)Results Sharing - A&G - FERC Account 920, 921 1-17Results Sharing - CSBU - FERC Account 905 18-33Results Sharing - GBU - FERC Account 500 34-49Results Sharing - TDBU - FERC Account 588 50-652012 Recorded Results Sharing & 2015 Forecast Results Sharing 66Results Sharing Payout Summary 2008-2012 67-71July 1, 2013 E-mail re: 2013 Goals and Results Sharing/MIP 732012 Results Sharing Program Summary 75-822012 Management Incentive Program Summary 83-90Executive Incentive Compensation Program Summary 91-95Long-Term Incentives FERC Account 920, 921 97-110Long-Term Incentives Forecast 111-112
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION1
Beginning of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Forecast Method Chosen
2012$ (000)
Recorded2012
Forecast2015
Labor Itemized Forecast 65,826 56,897Non-Labor N/A 0 0Other N/A 0 0Total 65,826 56,897
Description of Activity:
Results Sharing is SCE's annual incentive compensation plan which connects compensation to employees' annual job performance. Employees are eligible to earn a cash bonus based on individual and team (business unit or department) performance related to clear, measurable business goals.
Final Cost Centers included in this activity (See Appendix A for additional detail):
F502959 F503017 F526051
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
2Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
DETERMINATION OF RECORDED/ADJUSTED
\ Recorded Period$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012FERC Form 1 Recorded (Nominal $)
Labor 93,928 106,849 122,698 127,416 163,845
Non-Labor (2,616) 601 (142) 2,000 (2,000)
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 91,312 107,450 122,556 129,416 161,845
Adjustments- (Nominal $) - see Appendix B for additional deta ilLabor
Non-Labor
Other
(59,693)
2,616
0
(62,519)
(601)
0
(76,972)
142
0
(79,391)
(2,000)
0
(98,019)
2,000
0
Total (57,077) (63,120) (76,830) (81,391) (96,019)
Recorded/Adjusted (Nominal $)Labor
Non-Labor
Other
34,235
0
0
44,330
0
0
45,726
0
0
48,025
0
0
65,826
0
0
Total 34,235 44,330 45,726 48,025 65,826
Escalation:Labor
Non-Labor
Other
1.1414
1.0932
1.0000
1.1070
1.0743
1.0000
1.0701
1.0518
1.0000
1.0327
1.0240
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$)
Labor
Non-Labor
OtherTotal
39,076
0
039,076
49,074
0
0
48,929
0
049,074 48,929
49,597
0
049,597
65,826
0
065,826
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10,000
0
Recorded Adjusted 2008-2012 (2012$)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
□ Labor (std escl) I Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION3
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Fo recasting M ethods - Sum m ary o f R esults o f all M ethods S tud ied - 2012$ (000)
2 Recorded Years (2011 - 2012):Results o f Averaging (A2)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 57,712 57,712 57,712 8,114 no
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 no
Other 0 0 0 0 noTotal 57,712 57,712 57,712 n/a n/a
3 Recorded Years (2010 - 2012):
Results o f Linear Trending (T3 ) Results o f Averaging (A3)
2013 2014 | 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 71,681 80,129 88,577 0.78 no 54,784 54,784 54,784 7,812 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0. 00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0. 00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 71,681 80,129 88,577 n/a n/a 54,784 54,784 54,784 n/a n/a
4 Recorded Years (2009 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T4) Results o f Averaging (A4)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 66,088 71,180 76,273 0. 62 no 53,357 53,357 53,357 7,204 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0. 00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 66,088 71,180 76,273 n/a n/a 53,357 53,357 53,357 n/a n/a
5 Recorded Years (2008 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T5) Results o f Averaging (A5)
LaborNon-LaborOtherTotal
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 I r2* 1 Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen66,708 72,110 77,512 0. 79 no 50,500 50,500 50,500 8,611 no
0 0 0 0. 00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
66,708 72,110 77,512 n/a n/a 50,500 50,500 50,500 n/a n/a
O ther M ethods:
Last Recorded Year (LRY) Itemized Forecast (IF)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
COoCM ^roCM 2015 1 | Chosen 2013 |
^roCM 2015 | | Chosen65,826 65,826 65,826 no 59,509 57,242 56,897 yes
0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no
65,826 65,826 65,826 n/a 59,509 57,242 56,897 n/a
Forecast A d jus tm en ts :Base Forecast Method Adjustments*
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
Method
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 |
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | |IF 59,509 57,242 56,897 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
59,509 57,242 56,897 0 0 0
r2 = R Squared (Based on recorded years data) sd = standard deviation (Based on recorded years data) See Appendix B For Additional Detail
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
4Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
R esults:
Fo recasting R esults
Method Selected 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |Labor Itemized Forecast 59,509 57,242 56,897
Non-Labor N/A 0 0 0Other N/A 0 0 0
Total 59,509 57,242 56,897
A na lys is o f Fo recasting M ethods
Analysis o f Linear Trending Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance and therefore is not necessarily a function of time. Additionally, total Results Sharing payout is a function of SC E labor amounts, which a linear trend against time does not represent.
Analysis o f Averaging Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), the averaging method represents a good indication of future Results Sharing payout. However, as total Res ults Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, a simple average of historical cost would not accurately represent potential Results Sharing payout especially if our labor costs were to decrease or increase significantly. As a result, the averaging method is rejected.
Analysis o f Last Recorded Year (2012):Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), last recorded year is not a reasonable forecasting method. Additionally, the Results Sharing payout for the Test Year will be a function of the SCE labor forecast, which a last recorded year does not necessarily represent.
Analysis o f Itemized Forecast Method:We have chosen a itemized method to forecast our costs. We used last recorded year costs (2012). We first determined the unit cost of Results Sharing by dividing the Results Sharing costs for 2012 by the labor expense for 2012. To calculate test year costs, we then applied this unit cost to the labor expense fore cast for 2013 through 2015.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION5
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General S alaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10,000
0
Recorded 2008-2012 / Forecast 2013-2015 2012$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
R ecorded Period$ (000)
Forecast Expenses (constant 2012$) 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 2013 | 2014 | 2015Labor (standard escalation) 39,076 49,074 48,929 49,597 65,826 59,509 57,242 56,897Non-Labor (standard escalation) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other (not escalatable) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 39,076 49,074 48,929 49,597 65,826 59,509 57,242 56,897
Labor Prior year Total 65,826 59,509 57,242
Change (6,317) (2,267) (345)Total 65,826 59,509 57,242 56,897
Non-Labor Prior year Total 0 0 0Change 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Other Prior year Total 0 0 0
Change 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0
Total Change |Labor (6,317) (2,267) (345)
Non-Labor 0 0 0Other 0 0 0
Total N/A (6,317) (2,267) (345)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
6Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Adm inistrative and General S alaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2012 - 2013
Labor: (6,317)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2013.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION7
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2013 - 2014
Labor: (2,267)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2014.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
8Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Adm inistrative and General S alaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2014 - 2015______________________________________________________________________________
Labor: (345)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2015.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION9
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
Mark Bennett
APPE NDIX A
Detail Description of Final Cost Centers Included in This Activity
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
10Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
Activity: RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Description of Final Cost Centers included in this activity:
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSESIncludes expenses associated with Results Sharing, Management Incentive Program (MIP) award payments and other miscellaneous general & administrative expenses.
F503017 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONIncludes salaries and expenses o f the executive officers o f the com pany .
F526051 SMARTCONNECT - RESULTS SHARINGIncludes Results Sharing and Management Incentive Program (MIP) awards o f employees supporting the Edison SmartConnect program.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION11
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$) By Final Cost Center$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
32,400 40,623 40,662 42,027 56,838
F503017 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
5,535 6,490 5,894 4,832 5,734
F526051 SMARTCONNECT - RESULTS SHARING 1,141 1,961 2,373 2,738 3,254
Total 39,076 49,074 48,929 49,597 65,826
* Due to rounding, totals may not tie to other workpaper pages.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
12Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION13
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX B
Detail of Total Company Adjustments to Recorded
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
14Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : RE S U LTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total Com pan y A d jus tm en ts to Recorded Expenses
| A d js - (Nom inal $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Labor (59,693) (62,519) (76,972) (79,391) (98,019) 0 0 0Non-Labor 2,616 (601) 142 (2,000) 2,000 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (57,077) (63,120) (76,830) (81,391) (96,019) 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustment 1 GRC-DAT-CW -FLSA ACCRUAL
This adjustment removes the FLSA accruals related to shift differential pay.
Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 (2,000) 2,000 0 0 0
O ther 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 (2,000) 2,000 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustment 2 GRC-KBS-CW -CORRECT REVERSAL
This adjustment corrects an accrual reversal that recorded to non-labor instead o f labor.
Labor (666) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor 666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O ther 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustment 3 GRC-JAB-CW -R/S ACCRUALADJ
This adjustment adjusts the Results Sharing accrual am ount to reflect actual Results Sharing paid out less participantcredits.
Labor 2,290 7,937 (549) 1,085 707 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O ther 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2,290 7,937 (549) 1,085 707 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 4 GRC-JAB-CW -GBU R/S
This adjustment is associated w ith the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" P rogram . The Results Sharing Program was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing has been removed from FERC account 920-921 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing were paid out.
Labor (20,116) (20,786) (21,078) (22,468) (28,191) 0 0 0Non-Labor 3,058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (17,058) (20,786) (21,078) (22,468) (28,191) 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION15
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : R E S U LTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total C om pany A d jus tm en ts to R ecorded Expenses
A d js - (N om ina l $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Company W ide Adjustm ent 5 GRC-JAB-CW -CSBU R/S
This adjustment is associated w ith the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" Program. The Results Sharing Program was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing has been removed from FERC account 920 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing were paid out.
LaborNon-LaborOther
(15,272)00
(18,823)00
(20,044)00
(19,394)00
(21,835)00
0 0 0 0 0 0
000
Total (15,272) (18,823) (20,044) (19,394) (21,835) 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 6 GRC-JAB-CW -TDBU R/S
This adjustment is associated w ith the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" Program. The Results Sharing Program was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing has been removed from FERC account 920 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing were paid out.
LaborNon-LaborOther
(33,747)00
(40,551)00
(45,656)00
(46,991)00
(58,915)00
0 0 0 0 0 0
000
Total (33,747) (40,551) (45,656) (46,991) (58,915) 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 7 GRC-MHJ-CW -ONETIMEREMOVAL
This adjustment removes expenses which SCE is not seeking recovery in the General Rate Case
LaborNon-LaborOther
000
000
0142
0
000
000
0 0 0 0 0 0
000
Total 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 1 A&G HRADM IN-RMA.GMD-OUX-NONOFFICER EXEC TRANSFER
For forecasting purposes, th is adjustment transfers non-officer executive bonuses to the Results Sharing activity in the organization corresponding to each executive's activity grou p.
LaborNon-LaborOther
7,82400
9,70400
10,35500
8,37700
10,21500
0 0 0 0 0 0
000
Total 7,824 9,704 10,355 8,377 10,215 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
16Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : R ES ULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total Com pan y A d jus tm en ts to Recorded Expenses
| A d js - (N om inal $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 2 A&G RESSHR-GMD.KW K-OUX-NON-RESULTS SHARING TRANSFER
This adjustment transfers Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software costs from Results Sharing to the Information Technology Operating Unit. These costs were incorrectly ch arged to a Results Sharing final cost center.
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
0735
0
735
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 3 A&G RESSHR-GMD.RSL-OUX-NON-RESULTS SHARING TRANSFER
This adjustment transfers m iscellaneous, non-Results Sharing costs from Result Sharing A&G 920-921 to Financial Services 923-930 and Financial Services Miscellaneous Expenses 920-921.
LaborNon-LaborO ther
Total
(6)(1,843)
0
(1,849)
0(630)
0
(630)
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 4 A&G RESSHR-GMD.MJP-OUX-TRANSFER TO OTHER A&G
This adjustment transfers m iscellaneous non-results sharing expenses from the Results Sharing activity to the Other A&G activity.
LaborNon-LaborO ther
Total
O rganizational Unit Adjustm ent 5 A&G RESSHR-GMD.MJP-OUX-EMS TRANSFER
This adjustment transfers Edison Material Supply costs from Controllers to O ther A & G . These costs were ultimately transferred to O ther Operating Revenue (OOR).
Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 26
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION17
End of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
RESULTS SHARING - A&G - 920-921
Mark Bennett
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
18Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Beginning of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Customer Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Forecast Method Chosen
2012$ (000)
Recorded2012
Forecast2015
Labor Itemized Forecast 21,835 22,993Non-Labor N/A 0 0Other N/A 0 0Total 21,835 22,993
Description of Activity:
Results Sharing is SCE's annual incentive compensation plan which connects compensation to employees' annual job performance. Employees are eligible to earn a cash bonus based on individual and team (business unit or department) performance related to clear, measurable business goals.
Final Cost Centers included in this activity (See Appendix A for additional detail):
F502959 F503018
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION19
FERC A ccoun t: 905 Miscellaneous Customer Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER S ERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
DETERMINATION OF RECORDED/ADJUSTED
\ Recorded Period$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012FERC Form 1 Recorded (Nominal $)
Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Adjustments- (Nominal $) - see Appendix B for additional deta i lLabor
Non-Labor
Other
15,272
0
0
18,823
0
0
20,044
0
0
19,394
0
0
21,835
0
0
Total 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835
Recorded/Adjusted (Nominal $)Labor
Non-Labor
Other
15,272
0
0
18,823
0
0
20,044
0
0
19,394
0
0
21,835
0
0
Total 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835
Escalation:Labor
Non-Labor
1.1414
1.0846
1.1070
1.0775
1.0701
1.0550
1.0327
1.0248
1.0000
1.0000
Other 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$)
Labor
Non-Labor
OtherTotal
17,431 20,837 21,448 20,029 21,835
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 017,431 20,837 21,448 20,029 21,835
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
Recorded Adjusted 2008-2012 (2012$)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-L abor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
20Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 905 Miscellaneous Customer Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SE RVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Fo recasting M ethods - Sum m ary o f R esults o f a ll M ethods S tud ied - 2012$ (000)
2 Recorded Years (2011 - 2012):Results of Averaging (A2)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 20,932 20,932 20,932 903 no
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 no
Other 0 0 0 0 noTotal 20,932 20,932 20,932 n/a n/a
3 R ecorded Years (2010 - 2012):
Results o f Linear Trending (T3) Results of Averaging (A3)
2013 2014 | 2015 | r2* | Chosen 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 21,491 21,684 21,878 0.04 no 21,104 21,104 21,104 776 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 21,491 21,684 21,878 n/a n/a 21,104 21,104 21,104 n/a n/a
4 Recorded Years (2009 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T4) Results of Averaging (A4)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | l2* | Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 21,431 21,588 21,746 0.0 7 no 21,037 21,037 21,037 682 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 21,431 21,588 21,746 n /a n/a 21,037 21,037 21,037 n/a n/a
5 R ecorded Years (2008 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T5) Results of Averaging (A5)
LaborNon-LaborOtherTotal
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 I r2* | Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen22,716 23,516 24,316 0.52 no 20,316 20,316 20,316 1,566 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
22,716 23,516 24,316 n/a n/a 20,316 20,316 20,316 n/a n/a
O ther M ethods:
Last Recorded Year (LRY) Itemized Forecast (IF)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | | Chosen 2013 |
^roCM 2015 | | Chosen21,835 21,835 21,835 no 22,316 23,226 22,993 yes
0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no
21,835 21,835 21,835 n/a 22,316 23,226 22,993 n/a
Forecast A d jus tm en ts :Base Forecast Method Adjustments*
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
Method
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 |
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | |IF 22,316 23,226 22,99 3 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
22,316 23,226 22,99 3 0 0 0
* r2 = R Squared (Based on recorded years data)** sd = standard deviation (Based on recorded years data)*** See Appendix B For Additional Detail
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION21
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
R esults:
Fo recasting R esults
Method Selected 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |Labor Itemized Forecast 22,316 23,226 22,993
Non-Labor N/A 0 0 0Other N/A
ooo
Total 22,316 23,226 22,993
A na lys is o f Fo recasting M ethods
Analysis of Linear Trending Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance and therefore is not necessarily a function of time. Additionally, total Results Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, which a linear trend against time does not represent.
Analysis of Averaging Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), the averaging method represents a good indication of future Results Sharing payout. However, as total Results Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, a simple average of historical cost would not accurately represent potential Results Sharing payout especially if our labor costs were to decrease or increase significantly. As a result, the averaging method is rejected.
Analysis of Last Recorded Year (2012):Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant u nusual events), last recorded year is not a reasonable forecasting method. Additionally, the Results Sharing payout for th e Test Year will be a function of the SCE labor forecast, which a last recorded year does not necessarily represent.
Analysis of Itemized Forecast Method:We have chosen itemized method to forecast our costs. We used last recorded year costs (2012). We first determined the unit cost of Results Sharing by dividing the Results Sharing costs for 2012 by the labor expense for 2012. To calculate test year costs, we then applied this unit cost to the labor expense forecast for 2013 through 2015.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
22Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
Recorded 2008-2012 / Forecast 2013-2015 2012$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
□ Labor (std escl) Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
2015
1 R ecorded Period$ (000)
Forecast Expenses (constant 2012$) 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 2013 | 2014 | 2015Labor (standard escalation) 17,431 20,837 21,448 20,029 21,835 22,316 23,226 22,993Non-Labor (standard escalation) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other (not escalatable) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 17,431 20,837 21,448 20,029 21,835 22,316 23,226 22,993
Labor Prior year Total 21,835 22,316 23,226
Change 481 910 (233)Total 21,835 22,316 23,226 22,993
Non-Labor Prior year Total 0 0 0Change 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Other Prior year Total 0 0 0
Change 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0
Total Change |Labor 481 910 (233)
Non-Labor 0 0 0Other 0 0 0
Total N/A 481 910 (233)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION23
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2012 - 2013
Labor: 481
Reflects an increase in Results Sharing costs based on an increase in estimated labor costs for 2013.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
24Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 905 Miscellaneous Customer Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2013 - 2014
Labor: 910
Reflects an increase in Results Sharing costs based on an increase in estimated labor costs for 2014.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION25
FERC A ccoun t: 905 Miscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2014 - 2015______________________________________________________________________________
Labor: (233)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2015.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
26Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION27
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
905 Miscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX A
Detail Description of Final Cost Centers Included in This Activity
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
28Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
Activity: RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SE RVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Description of Final Cost Centers included in this activity:
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSESIncludes expenses associated w ith Results Sharing, Management Incentive Program (MIP) award payments and other m iscellaneous general & administrative expenses.
F503018 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT)Includes salaries and expenses of the executive officers o f the com pany.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION29
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$) By Final Cost Center$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
16,242 19,288 19,739 18,980 20,686
F503018 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT)
1,189 1,549 1,709 1,049 1,149
Total 17,431 20,837 21,448 20,029 21,835
* Due to rounding, totals may not tie to other workpaper pages.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
30Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION31
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
905 Miscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX B
Detail of Total Company Adjustments to Recorded
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
32Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 905 Miscellaneous Custom er Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RES ULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total C om pany A d jus tm en ts to Recorded Expenses
A d js - (N om ina l $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Labor 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 1 GRC-JAB-CW -CSBU R/S
This adjustment is associated with the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" Program. The Results SharingProgram was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing hasbeen removed from FERC account 920 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing were paidout.
Labor 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 15,272 18,823 20,044 19,394 21,835 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION33
End of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 905 M iscellaneous Customer Accounts Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - CUSTOMER SERVICE - 905
W itness: Mark Bennett
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
34Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Beginning of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
Forecast Method Chosen
2012$ (000)
Recorded2012
Forecast2015
Labor Itemized Forecast 28,191 10,708Non-Labor N/A 0 0Other N/A 0 0Total 28,191 10,708
Description of Activity:
Results Sharing is SCE's annual incentive compensation plan which connects compensation to employees' annual job performance. Employees are eligible to earn a cash bonus based o n individual and team (business unit or department) performance related to clear, measurable business goals.
Final Cost Centers included in this activity (See Appendix A for additional detail):
F502959 F503017
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION35
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
DETERMINATION OF RECORDED/ADJUSTED
\ Recorded Period$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012FERC Form 1 Recorded (Nominal $)
Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Adjustments- (Nominal $) - see Appendix B for additional detailLabor
Non-Labor
Other
17,058
0
0
20,786
0
0
21,078
0
0
22,468
0
0
28,191
0
0
Total 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191
Recorded/Adjusted (Nominal $)Labor
Non-Labor
Other
17,058
0
0
20,786
0
0
21,078
0
0
22,468
0
0
28,191
0
0
Total 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191
Escalation:Labor
Non-Labor
1.1414
1.1186
1.1070
1.1173
1.0701
1.0861
1.0327
1.0253
1.0000
1.0000
Other 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$)
Labor
Non-Labor
OtherTotal
19,470 23,010 22,555 23,203 28,191
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 019,470 23,010 22,555 23,203 28,191
32.000
28.000
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
Recorded Adjusted 2008-2012 (2012$)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-La bor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
36Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
F o recasting M ethods - Sum m ary o f R esults o f a ll M ethods S tud ied - 2012$ (000)
2 Recorded Years (2011 - 2012):Results o f Averaging (A2)
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 25,697 25,697 25,697 2,494 no
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 no
Other 0 0 0 0 noTotal 25,697 25,697 25,697 n/a n/a
3 Recorded Years (2010 - 2012):
Results o f Linear Trending (T3) Results o f Averaging (A3)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
2013
^roCM 2015 | r2* | Chosen 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | sd** | Chosen30,286 33,104 35,922 0.84 no 24,650 24,650 24,650 2,518 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
30,286 33,104 35,922 n/a n/a 24,650 24,650 24,650 n/a n/a
(2009 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T4) Results o f Averaging (A4)
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | l2* | Chosen
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen28,288 29,907 31,526 0.62 no 24,240 24,240 24,240 2,293 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
28,288 29,907 31,526 n/a n/a 24,240 24,240 24,240 n/a n/a
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
5 Recorded Years (2008 - 2012):Results o f Linear Trending (T5) Results o f Averaging (A5)
LaborNon-LaborOtherTotal
COoCM ^roCM 2015 I r2* | Chosen
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen28,576 30,340 32,104 0.79 no 23,286 23,286 23,286 2,801 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
28,576 30,340 32,104 n/a n/a 23,286 23,286 23,286 n/a n/a
O ther M ethods:
Last Recorded Year (LRY) Itemized Forecast (IF)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | | Chosen 2013 |
^roCM 2015 | | Chosen28,191 28,191 28,191 no 19,336 13,325 10,708 yes
0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no
28,191 28,191 28,191 n/a 19,336 13,325 10,708 n/a
Forecast A d jus tm en ts :Base Forecast Method Adjustments*
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
Method
COoCM ^roCM 2015 |
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | |IF 19,336 13,325 10,708 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
19,336 13,325 10,708 0 0 0
* r2 = R Squared (Based on recorded years data)** sd = standard deviation (Based on recorded years data) *** See Appendix B For Additional Detail
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION37
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
R esults:
Fo recasting Results
Method Selected 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |Labor Itemized Forecast 19,336 13,325 10,708
Non-Labor N/A 0 0 0Other N/A 0 0 0
Total 19,336 13,325 10,708
A na lys is o f Fo recasting Methods
Analysis of Linear Trending Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance and therefore is not necessarily a function of time. Additionally, total Results Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, which a linear trend against time does not represent.
Analysis of Averaging Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), the averaging method represents a good indication of future Results Sharing payout. However, as total Resu lts Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, a simple average of historical cost would not accurately represent potential Results Sharing payout especially if our labor costs were to decrease or increase significantly. As a result, the averaging method is rejected.
Analysis of Last Recorded Year (2012):Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant un usual events), last recorded year is not a reasonable forecasting method. Additionally, the Results Sharing payout for the Test Year will be a function of the SCE labor forecast, which a last recorded year does not necessarily represent.
Analysis of Itemized Forecast Method:We have chosen itemized method to forecast our costs. We used last recorded year costs (2012). We first determined the unit cost of Results Sharing by dividing the Results Sharing costs for 2012 by the labor expense for 2012. To calculate test year costs, we then applied this unit cost to the labor expense forecast for 2013 through 2015.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
38Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Enginee ring
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 5 00
W itness: Mark Bennett
32.000
28.000
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
Recorded 2008-2012 / Forecast 2013-2015 2012$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
R ecorded Period$ (000)
Forecast Expenses (constant 2012$) 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 2013 | 2014 | 2015Labor (standard escalation) 19,470 23,010 22,555 23,203 28,191 19,336 13,325 10,708Non-Labor (standard escalation) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other (not escalatable) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 19,470 23,010 22,555 23,203 28,191 19,336 13,325 10,708
Labor Prior year Total 28,191 19,336 13,325
Change (8,855) (6,011) (2,617)Total 28,191 19,336 13,325 10,708
Non-Labor Prior year Total 0 0 0Change 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Other Prior year Total 0 0 0
Change 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0
Total Change |Labor (8,855) (6,011) (2,617)
Non-Labor 0 0 0Other 0 0 0
Total N/A (8,855) (6,011) (2,617)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION39
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2012 - 2013
Labor: (8,855)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2013.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
40Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of perso nnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2013 - 2014
Labor: (6,011)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2014.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION41
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Enginee ring
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 5 00
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2014 - 2015______________________________________________________________________________
Labor: (2,617)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2015.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
42Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION43
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX A
Detail Description of Final Cost Centers Included in This Activity
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
44Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
Activity: RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
Description of Final Cost Centers included in this activity:
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSESIncludes expenses associated with Results Sharing, Management Incentive Program (MIP) award payments and other miscellaneous general & administrative expenses.
F503017 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONIncludes salaries and expenses of the executive officers o f the com pany.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION45
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 5 00
W itness: Mark Bennett
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$) By Final Cost Center$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
18,379 21,691 20,717 21,639 26,494
F503017 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
1,091 1,320 1,837 1,565 1,697
Total 19,470 23,011 22,554 23,204 28,191
* Due to rounding, totals may not tie to other workpaper pages.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
46Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION47
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
500 Operation Supervision and Engine ering
RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX B
Detail of Total Company Adjustments to Recorded
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
48Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RE S U LTS SHARING - GENERATION - 500
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total C om pany A d jus tm en ts to Recorded Expenses
A d js - (N om inal $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Labor 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0
oooo
0 0 0
Total 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 1 GRC-JAB-CW -GBU R/S
This adjustment is associated w ith the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" Program. The Results SharingProgram was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing hasbeen removed from FERC account 920-921 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing werepaid out.
Labor 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0
oooo0 0 0
Total 17,058 20,786 21,078 22,468 28,191 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION49
End of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 500 Operation Supervision and Engineering
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - GENERATION - 50 0
W itness: Mark Bennett
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
50Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Beginning of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
Forecast Method Chosen
2012$ (000)
Recorded2012
Forecast2015
Labor Itemized Forecast 58,915 57,262Non-Labor N/A 0 0Other N/A 0 0Total 58,915 57,262
Description of Activity:
Results Sharing is SCE's annual incentive compensation plan which connects compensation to employees' annual job performance. Employees are eligible to earn a cash bonus based on individual and team (business unit or department) performance related to clear, measurable business goals.
Final Cost Centers included in this activity (See Appendix A for additional detail):
F502959 F503018
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION51
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
DETERMINATION OF RECORDED/ADJUSTED
I Recorded Period$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012FERC Form 1 Recorded (Nominal $)
Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Adjustments- (Nominal $) - see Appendix B for additional detailLabor 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915
Recorded/Adjusted (Nominal $)Labor 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915
Escalation:Labor 1.1414 1.1070 1.0701 1.0327 1.0000
Non-Labor 1.0971 1.1039 1.0776 1.0243 1.0000
Other 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$)Labor 38,519 44,890 48,855 48,529 58,915
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0____________ 0____________ 0____________ 0___________ 0Total 38,519 44,890 48,855 48,529 58,915
Recorded Adjusted 2008-2012 (2012$)
60,000 — =
50.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------= = ------------------- -------------------
40.000 --------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
30.000 --------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
20.000 -------------------
10,000 -------------------
0 . , . .--------------------2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
52Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
Fo recasting M ethods - Sum m ary o f R esults o f all M ethods S tud ied - 2012$ (000)
2 R ecorded Years (2011 - 2012):Results o f Averaging (A2)
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 53,722 53,722 53,722 5,193 no
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 no
Other 0 0 0 0 noTotal 53,722 53,722 53,722 n/a n/a
3 Recorded Years (2010 - 2012):
Results of Linear Trending (T3) Results o f Averaging (A3)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
2013
^roCM 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | sd** | Chosen62,160 67,190 72,220 0.73 no 52,100 52,100 52,100 4,821 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
62,160 67,190 72,220 n/a n/a 52,100 52,100 52,100 n/a n/a
(2009 - 2012):Results of Linear Trending (T4) Results o f Averaging (A4)
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen60,734 64,909 69,084 0.80 no 50,297 50,297 50,297 5,213 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
60,734 64,909 69,084 n/a n/a 50,297 50,297 50,297 n/a n/a
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
5 Recorded Years (2008 - 2012):Results of Linear Trending (T5) Results o f Averaging (A5)
LaborNon-LaborOtherTotal
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | r2* 1Chosen
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen61,271 65,714 70,157 0.90 no 47,942 47,942 47,942 6,629 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
61,271 65,714 70,157 n/a n/a 47,942 47,942 47,942 n/a n/a
O ther M ethods:
Last Recorded Year (LRY) Itemized Forecast (IF)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | | Chosen 2013 |
^roCM 2015 | | Chosen58,915 58,915 58,915 no 52,264 56,171 57,262 yes
0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no
58,915 58,915 58,915 n/a 52,264 56,171 57,262 n/a
Forecast A d jus tm en ts :Base Forecast Method Adjustments*
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
Method
COoCM ^roCM 2015 |
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | |IF 52,264 56,171 57,262 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
52,264 56,171 57,262 0 0 0
r2 = R Squared (Based on recorded years data) sd = standard deviation (Based on recorded years data) See Appendix B For Additional Detail
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION53
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
R esults:
Fo recasting R esults
Method Selected 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |Labor Itemized Forecast 52,264 56,171 57,262
Non-Labor N/A 0 0 0Other N/A 0 0 0
Total 52,264 56,171 57,262
A na lys is o f F o recasting M ethods
Analysis of Linear Trending Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance and therefore is not necessarily a function of time. Additionally, total Results Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, which a linear trend against time does not represent.
Analysis of Averaging Method:Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), the averaging method represents a good indication of future Results Sharing payout. However, as total Result s Sharing payout is a function of SCE labor amounts, a simple average of historical cost would not accurately represent potential Results Sharing payout especially if our labor costs were to decrease or increase significantly. As a result, the averaging method is rejected.
Analysis of Last Recorded Year (2012):Results Sharing payout is a function of individual and corporate performance. Because performance varies unpredictably from year-to-year (in normal years, that is year without significant unusual events), last recorded year is not a reasonable forecasting method. Additionally, the Results Sharing payout for the Test Year will be a function of the SCE labor forecast, which a last recorded year does not necessarily represent.
Analysis of Itemized Forecast Method:We have chosen itemized method to forecast our costs. We used last recorded year costs (2012). We first determined the unit cost of Results Sharing by dividing the Results Sharing costs for 2012 by the labor expense for 2012. To calculate test year costs, we then applied this unit cost to the labor expense forecast for 2013 through 2015.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
54Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
60,000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10,000
0
Recorded 2008-2012 / Forecast 2013-2015 2012$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Recorded Period$ (000)
Forecast Expenses (constant 2012$) 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 2013 | 2014 | 2015Labor (standard escalation) 38,519 44,890 48,855 48,529 58,915 52,264 56,171 57,262Non-Labor (standard escalation) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other (not escalatable) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 38,519 44,890 48,855 48,529 58,915 52,264 56,171 57,262
Labor Prior year Total 58,915 52,264 56,171
Change (6,651) 3,907 1,091Total 58,915 52,264 56,171 57,262
Non-Labor Prior year Total 0 0 0Change 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Other Prior year Total 0 0 0
Change 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0
Total Change |Labor (6,651) 3,907 1,091
Non-Labor 0 0 0Other 0 0 0
Total N/A (6,651) 3,907 1,091
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION55
FERC A ccoun t: 588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of perso nnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2012 - 2013
Labor: (6,651)
Reflects a decrease in Results Sharing costs based on a decrease in estimated labor costs for 2013.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
56Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2013 - 2014
Labor: 3,907
Reflects an increase in Results Sharing costs based on a increase in estimated labor costs for 2014.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION57
FERC A ccoun t: 588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2014 - 2015_____________________________________________________________________________
Labor: 1,091
Reflects an increase in Results Sharing costs based on a increase in estimated labor costs for 2015.
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
58Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION59
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
Mark Bennett
APPENDIX A
Detail Description of Final Cost Centers Included in This Activity
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
60Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expense s
Activity: RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
Description of Final Cost Centers included in this acti vity:
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS SH ARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES Includes expenses associated with Results Sharing, Management Incentive Program (MIP) award payments and other m iscellaneous general & administrative expenses.
F503018 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT)Includes salaries and expenses of the ex ecutive officers of the com pany .
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION61
FERC A ccoun t
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$) By Final Cost Center$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
Mark Bennett
F502959 CORPORATE BUDGETS - RESULTS 37,404 43,506 47,214 47,324 57,280SHARING AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
F503018 HUMAN RESOURCES - EXECUTIVE 1,115 1,384 1,640 1,205 1,635COMPENSATION (DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT)
Total 38,519 44,890 48,854 48,529 58,915
** Due to rounding, totals may not tie to other workpaper pages.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
62Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION63
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
588 Miscellaneous Distribution Expenses
RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
Mark Bennett
APPEN DIX B
Detail of Tota l Company Adjustments t o Recorded
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
64Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expens es
A c tiv ity : R E S U LTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
Detail o f Total C om pany A d jus tm en ts to Recorded Expenses
A d js - (N om inal $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Labor 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915 0 0 0
Company W ide Adjustm ent 1 GRC-JAB-CW -TDBU R/S
This adjustment is associated w ith the Employee Compensation "Results Sharing" P rogram . The Results SharingProgram was recorded in F502959 and F503017 in FERC Account 920. For trending purposes, Results Sharing hasbeen removed from FERC account 920 and transferred to the FERC accounts where the Results Sharing were paidout.
Labor 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 33,747 40,551 45,656 46,991 58,915 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION65
End of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 588 M iscellaneous Distribution Expenses
A c tiv ity : RESULTS SHARING - TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION - 588
W itness: Mark Bennett
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
CD CD
2012
Rec
ord
ed &
201
2 F
ore
cast
Res
ult
s S
har
ing
(R
S)
(Co
nst
ant
$000
)
Rec
ord
edR
SR
eco
rded
/Ad
jL
abo
rR
S/
Lab
or$
2012
2012
2012
2012
To
tal
Co
mp
any
($00
0)($
000)
($00
0)%
Gen
erat
ion
28,1
9128
,191
334,
834
8.42
%Le
ss P
artic
ipan
ts C
red
its’
Net
Gen
erat
ion
028
,191
028
,191
334,
834
8.42
%T
rans
mis
sion
& D
istr
ibut
ion
58,9
1558
,915
324,
192
18.1
7%C
usto
mer
Se
rvic
e **
21,8
3521
,835
176,
930
12.3
4%A
dmin
istr
ativ
e &
Gen
eral
65,8
2665
,826
363,
300
18.1
2%T
otal
174,
767
174,
767
1,19
9,25
6In
pu
t R
esu
lts
Sh
arin
g %
to
lab
or
PC
G R
ecor
ded
PC
G F
orec
ast
2013
, 20
14 &
201
5 R
S F
ore
cast
:
14.5
7%14
.57%
62,3
7067
,467
To
tal
Co
mp
any
RS
/La
bo
rSF
ore
cast
L
abo
r C
ost
**
RS
Fo
reca
stF
ore
cast
L
abo
r C
ost
**
RS
Fo
reca
stF
ore
cast
L
abo
r C
ost
**
RS
Fo
reca
stF
ore
cast
L
abo
r C
ost
**
RS
Fo
reca
stF
ore
cast
ab
or
Co
st *
RS
Fo
reca
st20
1220
13
|20
1320
14
|20
1420
15
|20
1520
16
|20
1620
17
|20
17%
(S00
0)(S
000)
(S00
0)(S
000)
(S00
0)(S
000)
(S00
0)(S
000)
(S00
0)(S
000)
Gen
erat
ion
8.42
%26
9,97
422
,730
179,
176
15,0
8613
9,28
311
,727
139,
283
11,7
2713
9,28
311
,727
Less
Par
ticip
ants
Cre
dits
(3,3
94)
(1,7
60)
(1,0
18)
(1,0
18)
(1,0
18)
Net
Gen
erat
ion
19,3
3613
,325
10,7
0810
,708
10,7
08T
rans
mis
sion
& D
istr
ibut
ion
18.1
7%28
7,59
652
,264
309,
090
56,1
7131
5,09
457
,262
315,
094
57,2
6231
5,09
457
,262
Cus
tom
er S
erv
ice
**12
.34%
180,
826
22,3
1618
8,20
423
,226
186,
311
22,9
9318
6,31
122
,993
186,
311
22,9
93A
dmin
istr
ativ
e &
Gen
eral
18.1
2%32
8,43
559
,509
315,
925
57,2
4231
4,02
156
,897
314,
021
56,8
9731
4,02
156
,897
Tota
l1,
066,
831
153,
425
992,
395
149,
964
954,
709
147,
860
954,
709
147,
860
954,
709
147,
860
* P
artic
ipan
t C
redi
ts f
or
Res
ults
Sh
arin
g ar
e re
cord
ed in
lab
or fo
r 20
12.
** H
isto
rical
lab
or is
adj
uste
d to
inc
lude
$62
,370
mill
ion
and
fore
cast
lab
or in
clud
es a
n ad
ditio
nal
$67,
467
mill
ion
for
lab
or r
elat
ed t
o P
ublic
Pur
pose
, D
eman
d R
espo
nse
Pro
gram
s
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
RE
SU
LTS
SH
AR
ING
PA
YO
UTS
1/
2012
SU
MM
AR
YN
omin
al D
olla
rs
Bus
ines
s U
nit
(FE
RC
Acc
t#)
A&
G
(920
)
Gen
erat
ion
(500
)Le
ss p
artic
ipan
t cre
dit
Gen
erat
ion
(500
) A
djus
ted
Tota
l
Tran
s &
Dis
tr
(588
)
Cus
tom
er S
ervi
ce
(905
)
Tota
l
Res
ults
S
hari
ng (
RS
) +
2012
Man
agem
ent
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am (
MIP
) 20
12
Non
-Off
icer
E
xec.
Inc
entiv
e C
omp.
Pla
n +
(NO
EIP
) 20
12
Tota
l Act
ual
Pay
out
x 20
12
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
orC
on
stan
t 201
2 =
Dol
lars
29,4
32,2
6030
,659
,755
5,73
4,29
165
,826
,306
1.00
0065
,826
,306
20,6
10,4
9510
,659
,144
1,69
6,60
632
,966
,245
1.00
0032
,966
,245
(4,7
75,8
91)
28,1
90,3
541.
0000
(4,7
75,8
91)
28,1
90,3
54
45,4
98,2
6311
,781
,983
1,63
5,44
458
,915
,690
1.00
0058
,915
,690
14,9
11,9
225,
773,
661
1,14
8,81
621
,834
,399
1.00
0021
,834
,399
110,
452,
940
58,8
74,5
4310
,215
,157
17
4,76
6,74
917
4,76
6,74
9
Bus
ines
s U
nits
not
incl
uded
in to
tals
abo
ve:
EIX
Edi
son
Car
rier
Sol
utio
ns
Com
mun
ity I
nvol
vem
ent
Pub
lic A
ffairs
Foo
tnot
es:
1- P
ayou
ts in
clud
e R
S,
MIP
and
Non
-Offi
cer
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
NO
EIP
.
CD
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
CD oo
RE
SU
LTS
SH
AR
ING
PA
YO
UTS
1/
2011
SU
MM
AR
YN
omin
al D
olla
rs
Bus
ines
s U
nit
(FE
RC
Acc
t#)
A&
G
(920
)
Gen
erat
ion
(500
)
Less
par
ticip
ant c
redi
t G
ener
atio
n (5
00)
Adj
uste
d To
tal
Tran
s &
Dis
tr
(588
)
Cu
sto
mer
Ser
vice
(9
05)
Tota
l
Res
ults
S
hari
ng (
RS
) +
2011
Man
agem
ent
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am (
MIP
) 20
11
Non
-Off
icer
E
xec.
Inc
entiv
e C
omp.
Pla
n +
(NO
EIP
) 20
11
Tota
l Act
ual
Pay
out
x 20
11
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
orC
on
stan
t 201
2 =
Dol
lars
23,0
24,1
3520
,321
,521
4,67
9,16
448
,024
,820
1.03
2749
,595
,232
17,5
21,5
807,
272,
459
1,51
4,70
526
,308
,744
1.03
2727
,169
,040
(3,8
41,3
72)
22,4
67,3
721.
0327
(3,9
66,9
85)
23,2
02,0
55
37,3
73,4
338,
451,
064
1,16
7,30
046
,991
,797
1.03
2748
,528
,429
13,8
21,4
574,
556,
136
1,01
6,10
019
,393
,693
1.03
2720
,027
,867
91,7
40,6
0540
,601
,180
8,37
7,26
913
6,87
7,68
214
1,35
3,58
2
Bus
ines
s U
nits
not
incl
uded
in t
otal
s ab
ove:
EIX
Edi
son
Car
rier
Sol
utio
ns
Com
mun
ity I
nvol
vem
ent
Pub
lic A
ffairs
Foo
tnot
es:
1- P
ayou
ts in
clud
e R
S,
MIP
and
Non
-Offi
cer
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
NO
EIP
.
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
RE
SU
LTS
SH
AR
ING
PA
YO
UTS
1/
2010
SU
MM
AR
YN
omin
al D
olla
rs
Bus
ines
s U
nit
(FE
RC
Acc
t#)
A&
G
(920
)
Gen
erat
ion
(500
)
Less
par
ticip
ant c
redi
t G
ener
atio
n (5
00)
Adj
uste
d To
tal
Tran
s &
Dis
tr
(588
)
Cus
tom
er S
ervi
ce
(905
)
Tota
l
Res
ults
S
hari
ng (
RS
) +
2010
Man
agem
ent
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am (
MIP
) 20
10
Non
-Off
icer
E
xec.
Inc
entiv
e C
omp.
Pla
n +
(NO
EIP
) 20
10
Tota
l A
ctua
l P
ayou
t x
2010
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
orC
on
stan
t 201
2 =
Dol
lars
21,0
23,2
7719
,194
,616
5,50
8,75
445
,726
,647
1.07
0148
,932
,085
15,8
89,4
926,
782,
609
1,71
7,27
024
,389
,371
1.07
0126
,099
,066
(3,3
11,2
16)
21,0
78,1
551.
0701
(3,5
43,3
32)
22,5
55,7
34
36,1
90,1
587,
932,
850
1,53
2,60
045
,655
,608
1.07
0148
,856
,066
13,8
44,2
644,
602,
732
1,59
6,64
120
,043
,637
1.07
0121
,448
,696
86,9
47,1
9138
,512
,807
10,3
55,2
6513
2,50
4,04
714
1,79
2,58
1
Bus
ines
s U
nits
not
incl
uded
in t
otal
s ab
ove:
EIX
Edi
son
Car
rier
Sol
utio
ns
Com
mun
ity I
nvol
vem
ent
Pub
lic A
ffairs
Foo
tnot
es:
1- P
ayou
ts in
clud
e R
S,
MIP
and
Non
-Offi
cer
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
NO
EIP
.
CD CD
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
o
RE
SU
LTS
SH
AR
ING
PA
YO
UTS
1/
2009
SU
MM
AR
YN
omin
al D
olla
rs
Non
-Off
icer
Bus
ines
s U
nit
(FE
RC
Acc
t#)
Res
ults
S
hari
ng (
RS
) +
2009
Man
agem
ent
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am (
MIP
) 20
09
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
+ (N
OE
IP)
2009
Tota
l Act
ual
Pay
out
x 20
09
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
orC
on
stan
t 201
2 =
Dol
lars
A&
G
(920
)17
,964
,378
20,5
04,3
025,
863,
940
44,3
32,6
201.
1070
49,0
76,2
10
Gen
erat
ion
(500
)
Less
par
ticip
ant c
redi
t G
ener
atio
n (5
00)
Adj
uste
d To
tal
15,8
10,1
677,
121,
482
1,19
1,73
724
,123
,386
(3,3
37,8
98)
20,7
85,4
89
1.10
70
1.10
70
26,7
04,5
88
(3,6
95,0
53)
23,0
09,5
35
Tran
s &
Dis
tr
(588
)31
,450
,908
7,84
9,86
71,
249,
500
40,5
50,2
751.
1070
44,8
89,1
54
Cus
tom
er S
ervi
ce
(905
)12
,393
,573
5,03
0,26
51,
398,
501
18,8
22,3
391.
1070
20,8
36,3
29
Tota
l77
,619
,026
40,5
05,9
169,
703,
678
124,
490,
723
137,
811,
229
Bus
ines
s U
nits
not
incl
uded
in to
tals
abo
ve:
EIX
Edi
son
Car
rier
Sol
utio
ns
Com
mun
ity I
nvol
vem
ent
Pub
lic A
ffairs
Foo
tnot
es:
1- P
ayou
ts in
clud
e R
S,
MIP
and
Non
-Offi
cer
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
NO
EIP
.
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
RE
SU
LTS
SH
AR
ING
PA
YO
UTS
1/
2008
SU
MM
AR
YN
omin
al D
olla
rs
Non
-Off
icer
Bus
ines
s U
nit
(FE
RC
Acc
t#)
Res
ults
S
hari
ng (
RS
) +
2008
Man
agem
ent
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am (
MIP
) 20
08
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
+ (N
OE
IP)
2008
Tota
l A
ctua
l P
ayou
t x
2008
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
orC
on
stan
t 201
2 =
Dol
lars
A&
G
(920
)15
,553
,844
13,8
32,6
074,
848,
828
34,2
35,2
791.
1414
39,0
76,1
47
Gen
erat
ion
(500
)
Less
par
ticip
ant c
redi
t G
ener
atio
n (5
00)
Adj
uste
d To
tal
14,4
25,1
314,
733,
426
956,
397
20,1
14,9
54
(3,0
56,7
39)
17,0
58,2
15
1.14
14
1.14
14
22,9
59,2
09
(3,4
88,9
62)
19,4
70,2
47
Tran
s &
Dis
tr
(588
)28
,238
,692
4,53
1,02
097
7,10
033
,746
,812
1.14
1438
,518
,611
Cu
stom
er S
ervi
ce
(905
)10
,719
,795
3,50
9,91
71,
041,
755
15,2
71,4
671.
1414
17,4
30,8
52
Tota
l68
,937
,462
26,6
06,9
707,
824,
080
100,
311,
773
114,
495,
858
Bus
ines
s U
nits
not
incl
uded
in
tota
ls a
bove
:E
IXE
diso
n C
arrie
r S
olut
ions
C
omm
unity
Inv
olve
men
t P
ublic
Affa
irs
Foo
tnot
es:
1- P
ayou
ts in
clud
e R
S,
MIP
and
Non
-Offi
cer
Exe
c. I
ncen
tive
Com
p. P
lan
NO
EIP
.
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
72Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION73
To:Cc:Bcc:Subject:From:
W e've Made Some Changes to Our 2013 Goals and Results Sharing/MIP Ron Litzinger/COM M/SCE/EIX@ EIX - Monday 07/01/2013 05:58 PM
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
To: Southern California Edison Employees
The 2013 Operational & Service Excellence (OpX) framework defines our strategic objectives as a company, and the goals we’ve set to help us meet them.
We have finalized a subset of those goals by organizational unit tied to Results Sharing and Management Incentive Program (MIP) plans for 2013. You’ll notice that the OU goals have been organized into seven categories. Two of these categories, Blue Chips and Pacesetter, are new and identify goals that are high-priority initiatives not called out specifically on the OpX framework and those that will help us become an industry leader.
These changes to Results Sharing and MIP are designed to focus and streamline the goals, and create a more direct line of sight to OpX and each OU's top priorities. You will also notice two of the categories, Safety and Affordability, may be met by either your OU or the Company meeting the goal, which is intended to drive teamwork across the organization. Senior leaders in your own OU will share more about your respective goals in upcoming communications.
We have also updated our Results Sharing and MIP plans for 2013 to further support the company’s OpX vision and pay-for-performance philosophy. For the 2013 plans, you’ll see some changes:
• Payouts are tied to fewer goals overall.• OUs must achieve at least five of the seven goal categories to potentially receive a full payout.• An individual performance modifier will now be applied to final payouts for all exempt employees.
Look for program brochures on Portal later this month. For questions about Results Sharing and MIP, please contact the Employee Information Center at 23456 or (626) 302-3456.
Ron
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
74Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION75
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
76Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
P r o g r a m b a s ic s
W h a t is Results Sharing (RS)?
S o u th e rn C a lifo rn ia E dison is c o m m it te d to o ffe r in g e m p lo ye e s m a rk e t c o m p e tit iv e to ta l co m p e n s a tio n
o p p o r tu n it ie s . To ta l c o m p e n s a tio n con s is ts o f th re e c o m p le m e n ta ry e le m e n ts — base pay, v a r ia b le pay and
re c o g n it io n aw a rds .
2 0 1 2 RS is an a n n u a l v a r ia b le pay p ro g ra m th a t p ro v id e s yo u an o p p o r tu n ity to e a rn a cash b o n u s based
on p e r fo rm a n c e ag a in s t 1) C o m p a n y goa ls , 2) th e C o m p a n y o p e ra t io n s and m a in te n a n c e (O & M ) b u d g e t, 3)
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t goa ls , and 4) o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M b u d g e t.
2 0 1 2 RS h e lp s yo u fo cu s on a c t iv it ie s th a t have an im p a c t — b o th d ire c t and in d ire c t — o n th e C o m p a n y 's
success. Y our c o n tr ib u t io n s to c u s to m e r se rv ice , sa fe ty , cos t c o n tro l, e ff ic ie n c y and o th e r goa ls h e lp d r iv e SCE
to w a rd th e a c h ie v e m e n t o f its o p e ra t io n a l and f in a n c ia l ta rg e ts d u r in g th e 2 0 1 2 p e r fo rm a n c e p e rio d , w h ic h ru ns
fro m Ja n u a ry 1, 2 0 1 2 th ro u g h D e c e m b e r 31 , 2 0 12 . P a rtic ip a tio n in th is p ro g ra m g ives yo u a f in a n c ia l s take in
a ch ie v in g th o s e ta rg e ts .
2 0 1 2 RS a w a rd s w ill be p a id in th e f ir s t q u a r te r o f 2013.
W h a t determines the 2012 RS payouts?
P ayou t leve ls a re based on th e fo l lo w in g to ta l ta rg e t b o nus o p p o r tu n it ie s :
• 4% o f e lig ib le e a rn in g s fo r n o n e x e m p t and re p re s e n te d e m p lo ye e s
• 8% o f e lig ib le e a rn in g s fo r e x e m p t, n o n re p re s e n te d e m p lo ye e s
Above-target payouts m a y be a ch ie ve d i f 1) th e C o m p a n y ach ie ves 18 o r m o re o f its 23 ta rg e te d 20 12
p e r fo rm a n c e goa ls (see page 5), 2) th e C o m p a n y com es in u n d e r its O & M b u d g e t, 3) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /
d e p a r tm e n t ach ie ves a t leas t 75% o f its 2 0 1 2 R S/M IP goa ls , a n d /o r 4) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
do es n o t exceed its O & M b u d g e t. T h e f in a l a d ju s te d a w a rd m a y n o t exceed 150% o f th e to ta l ta rg e t b o n u s
o p p o r tu n ity .
Below-target payouts m a y be a ch ie ve d i f 1) th e C om pa ny ach ie ves fe w e r th a n 18 o f its 23 ta rg e te d 20 12
p e r fo rm a n c e goa ls , 2) th e C o m p a n y com es in o v e r its O & M b u d g e t, 3) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
ach ie ves less th a n 75% o f its 2 0 1 2 R S /M IP goa ls , a n d /o r 4) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t exceeds its
O & M b u d g e t.
A w a rd s m a y be lim ite d by th e a m o u n t a u th o r iz e d by th e 2 0 1 2 G en e ra l Rate Case.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION77
h o w 2012 r s w o r k s
The funding of the 2012 RS awards starts with a pool of dollars that equals eligible earnings multiplied by a participant's bonus target for all participants, limited by the amount authorized by the 2012 General Rate Case. The pool is then modified as follows:
Achievement of the 2012 Company goals:
Fu
nd
ing
Achievement of... Funding level...*1 18 - 23 goa ls = T a rge t fu n d in g
F e w er th a n 18 goa ls = Less th a n ta rg e t fu n d in g*Limited by the amount authorized by the 2012 General Rate Case.
2Performance against 2012 Company O&M budget.T h e p o o l increases i f w e a re u n d e r b u d g e t and de crease s i f w e go o v e r b u d g e t.
The available pool of funding dollars is then allocated to each organizational unit/department based on the number of eligible participants in each organizational unit/department and their applicable target award percentages. Awards are paid as follows:
3 a
3 b
3c
Achievement of 2012 Company goals and Company O&M budget as set forth in Steps 1 & 2 above.
50% o f th e a llo c a tio n is n o t
s u b je c t to a d ju s tm e n t based on 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t goa ls.
Achievement of at least 75% of 2012 organizational unit/department RS/MIP goals.A c h ie v e m e n t o f less th a n 75% o f th e 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t R S /M IP goa ls w ill
re d u ce th is p o r t io n o f th e a w a rd p a yo u t.
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is s u b je c t to
a d ju s tm e n t based o n th e a c h ie v e m e n t
o f 20 1 2 o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
R S /M IP goals.
Performance against 2012 organizational unit/ department O&M budget. E xceed ing th e 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M b u d g e t w ill
e lim in a te th is p o r t io n o f th e a w a rd payo u t.
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a w a rd e d o n ly
i f an o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
do es n o t exceed its O & M b u d g e t.
In o ther words... The entire funded pool amount is based on performance against Company goals and O&M budget and is allocated and paid as follows:
50% o f th e a llo c a tio n
is p a id based so le ly on th e
a c h ie v e m e n t o f C o m p a n y
goa ls and p e rfo rm a n c e ag a ins t
C o m p a n y O & M b u d g e t.
^ 3 b 25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a d ju s ta b le based
on p e rfo rm a n c e ag a in s t 2 0 1 2 o rg a n iz a tio n a l
u n it /d e p a r tm e n t R S /M IP goals.
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a w a rd e d o n ly
i f o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M
b u d g e t goa l is m e t o r u n d e rs p e n t.
2
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
78Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Ex a m p l e o f h o w 2012 RS W o r k s
E x a m p le # 1
For illustration purposes, we will assume that the Company achieves 18 of its 2012 goals and meets the Company O&M budget. Your organizational unit/department achieves more than 75% of its 2012 RS/MIP goals and meets its O&M budget. This example is based upon an exempt employee with eligible earnings of $80,000 and 8% of total target bonus. Given this scenario, the 2012 RS individual payout would be calculated as shown below:
3 a
3 b
3c
Achievement of at least 18 Company goals results in initial Company funding at the target level.
Eligible Earnings for this Target Award Initial CompanyExempt Employee Percentage Funding
x$ 8 0 ,0 0 0 8 %
r$ 6 ,4 0 0 *
IAchievement of the Company O&M budget results in
no increase or decrease to the initial Company funding.
Initial Company Funding
O&M Budget Outcome (Meets)
Final Company Funded Pool
$ 6 ,4 0 0 + / - N o Im p a c t = $ 6 ,4 0 0
1
Unadjusted award based on Company performance
CompanyFunding Unadjusted percentage RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 5 0 % = $ 3 ,2 0 0
Achievement of 75% or more of organizational unit/department 2012 RS goals
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department RS goals RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 1 ,6 0 0
Achievement of organizational unit/department 2012 O&M budget
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department O&M budget RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 1 ,6 0 0
3 aPortion of
award based on Company performance
$ 3 ,2 0 0
3 bPortion of award adjusted to reflect organizational
unit / department performance
$ 1 ,6 0 0
3cPortion of award subject to elimination based on
performance against organizational unit /
department O&M budget
$ 1 ,6 0 0
Total Award
$ 6 ,4 0 0
*For illustration purposes only, percentage w ill vary based on actual achievement and may be limited by the dollar amount authorized by 2012 GRC.
i
2
+ +
3
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION79
Ex a m p l e o f h o w 2012 RS W o r k s
E x a m p le # 2
For illustration purposes, we will assume that the Company achieves 18 of its 2012 goals and meets the Company O&M budget. Your organizational unit/department achieves more than 75% of its 2012 RS/MIP goals and exceeds its O&M budget. This example is based upon an exempt employee with eligible earnings of $80,000 and 8% of total target bonus. Given this scenario, the 2012 RS individual payout would be calculated as shown below:
3 a
3 b
3c
Achievement of at least 18 Company goals results in initial Company funding at the target level.
Eligible Earnings for this Target Award Initial CompanyExempt Employee Percentage Funding
x$ 8 0 ,0 0 0 8 %
f$ 6 ,4 0 0 *
I
Achievement of the Company O&M budget results in no increase or decrease to the initial Company funding.
Initial Company Funding
O&M Budget Outcome (Meets)
Final Company Funded Pool
$ 6 ,4 0 0 + / - N o Im p a c t = $ 6 ,4 0 0
1
Unadjusted award based on Company performance
CompanyFunding Unadjusted percentage RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 5 0 % = $ 3 ,2 0 0
Achievement of 75% or more of organizational unit/department 2012 RS goals
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department RS goals RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 1 ,6 0 0
Achievement of organizational unit/department 2012 O&M budget
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department O&M budget RS Payout
$ 6 ,4 0 0 x 0 %
O-toll
3 aPortion of
award based on Company performance
$ 3 ,2 0 0
3 bPortion of award adjusted to reflect organizational
unit / department performance
$ 1 ,6 0 0
3cPortion of award subject to elimination based on
performance against organizational unit /
department O&M budget
$ 0
Total Award
$ 4 ,8 0 0
*For illustration purposes only, percentage will vary based on actual achievement and may be lim ited by the dollar amount authorized by 2012 GRC.
i
2
+ +
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
80Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
2012 RS C o m p a n y G o a l s
SCE must achieve 18 or more of these goals and meet the SCE O&M budget to fund the 2012 RS award pool at target (m ay be lim ite d by d o lla r a m o u n t a u th o r iz e d by 2 0 1 2 GRC). D e ta ils on th e goa ls a re a va ila b le o n P o rta l: M y
C o m p a n y > V is io n , S tra te g y & G oa ls > O v e rv ie w > C o m p a n y G oa ls and 2 0 1 2 Business B rie fin g M a te r ia ls > 2 0 1 2 SCE Goals.
SAFETY • Im prove w orkp lace safety to achieve in ju ry free workp lace• No serious in juries to th e public resu l ting fro m system failures
COMPLIANCE • Build and m ain ta in a com prehensive com pany-w ide Ethics and Compliance program w ith an emphasis on strengthening a cu ltu re o f com pliance
OPERATIONAL AND SERVICE EXCELLENCE
Customer Satisfaction• M a in ta in Service Delivery Satisfaction• M a in ta in Custom er Favorability
Reliability• M a in ta in Power Delivery custom er satisfaction and re liab ility perform ance• Effectively manage Power Supply operations
SONGS• Achieve targets fo r INPO perform ance ind ica tor index and (18 M on th ro lling average) capability fac to r• Achieve SONGS Regulatory Performa nce Goal
M ajor Capital Projects• M a in ta in m a jor projects w ith in curren tly com m itted scope, schedule and budget, sub ject to approved
changes, and successfully w iths tand any challenges to fu ll cost recovery• Obtain regu la to ry approval fo r the revised cost cap fo r Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project
(TRTP) th a t reflects fina l engineering costs and fo r Devers Colorado River (DCR) updated cost estimates, as approp ria te
DBESpend• Provide su ffic ien t opportun ities to increase purchases o f materials and services w ith Diverse Business
Enterprises
STRATEGICINITIATIVES
• Successfully im plem ent Rate Challenge program th a t produces a system average rate per k ilow a tt hour in line w ith target
• Achieve a fina l 2012 General Rate Case decision, at the earliest possible date, consistent w ith SCE's capital investm ent forecast and operations
PUBLIC POLICY • Develop and execute a stra tegy fo r educating state policymakers, stakeholders and customers about the costs o f public policy programs and th e ir im pact on rates
• Im p lem ent com petitive principles to ensure acceptable CAISO Tariff Filing fo r 3rd Party Transmission Providers requ iring the 3rd party transm ission providers to bear an approp ria te share o f risks consistent w ith FERC O rder 1000
• Ensure effective policy decisions and re lated com m unica tion to advocate fo r fa ir and equ itab le rules to m inim ize the costs o f SCE's procurem ent po rtfo lio , renewable in tegration and grid re liab ility costs
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Enterprise Risk Management Program• S trengthen com prehensive com pany-w ide Enterprise Risk M anagem ent program w ith an emphasis on
the company's risk m anagem ent cult ure and m itiga tion practices
Business Resiliency• Advance Edison's ab ility to rapidly respond and manage th rough business disruptions and catastrophic
events
PEOPLE AND CULTURE
• S trengthen pay fo r perform ance objectives by increasing the d iffe ren tia tion o f bonus and stock awards• Im prove representation o f ethn ic m ino rities and fem ales across executive population• Im p lem ent im provem ent plans to address areas o f weakness iden tified by w o rk environm ent reviews
FINANCIALPERFORMANCE
• Achieve th e core earnings ta rg e t*• Obtain a 2013 cost o f capital decision by Decem ber 31, 2012 th a t retains the key e lem ents o f the
existing cost o f capital mechanism, and provides a com pensatory authorized Return on Equity
*RS excludes SCE Company Earning Per Share (EPS) goal.
5
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION81
Pr o g r a m d e t a il s
GeneralA ll n o n -e x e c u tiv e SCE e m p lo y e e s w ith s a tis fa c to ry p e r fo rm a n c e m a y re ce ive an a w a rd fro m 20 1 2 RS e xce p t te m p o ra ry
e m p lo ye e s and th o s e e m p lo y e e s p a r t ic ip a tin g in any o th e r a n n u a l bo n u s p ro g ra m de s ig n e d to re p la ce th e 2 0 1 2 RS
P rog ram (e .g., M a n a g e m e n t In c e n tiv e P rog ram ).
Eligibility
Active EmployeesA c tiv e e m p lo ye e s m u s t w o rk 5 2 0 "a c t iv e " h o u rs fo r SCE d u r in g th e 2 0 1 2 p a y ro ll c a le n d a r y e a r (Pay P e riod #1 be g ins on
D e c e m b e r 19, 2 0 11 , and Pay P e riod #2 6 en ds o n D e c e m b e r 16, 20 1 2 ) and be on th e C o m p a n y 's p a y ro ll on th e la s t day
o f th e b o n u s p e r io d (D e ce m b e r 31, 20 1 2 ) to be e lig ib le fo r an a w a rd . H ow eve r, i f y o u a re s u b s e q u e n tly te rm in a te d fo r
m is c o n d u c t o r p o o r p e r fo rm a n c e b e fo re p a yo u t, y o u w il l a u to m a tic a lly fo r fe i t any a w a rd .
Active/Inactive HoursT h e 5 2 0 "a c t iv e " h o u rs re q u ire d fo r e l ig ib il i ty fo r a c tiv e e m p lo y e e s in c lu d e th o s e h o u rs w h e n yo u a re a c tiv e ly w o rk in g
a t y o u r jo b and in c lu d e h o u rs c o m p e n s a te d as re g u la r pay, o v e r t im e , d o u b le t im e and s u p p le m e n ta l o v e r t im e . H ours
c o m p e n s a te d as C o m p a n y h o lid a ys a re a lso in c lu d e d . H ou rs c o m p e n s a te d as pe rso n a l t im e o f f aw ay fro m w o rk (e .g.,
s ick t im e , v a c a tio n , f lo a t in g h o lid ay , p a rtia l day absences) a re c o n s id e re d v o lu n ta ry o r " in a c t iv e h o u rs ," and d o n o t
c o u n t to w a rd s th e 5 2 0 -h o u r e lig ib il i ty re q u ire m e n t.
Terminated EmployeesE m p loye es w h o s e e m p lo y m e n t is te rm in a te d d u r in g 2 0 1 2 d ue to re t ire m e n t, d e a th o r u n d e r th e c u r re n t Edison
In te rn a tio n a l S everance P lan o r W o rk e r P ro te c tio n B e n e fits A g re e m e n t m a y re ce ive d a p ro ra te d a w a rd based on th e
t im e a c tiv e ly e m p lo y e d d u r in g 2 0 12 . T h e 5 2 0 "a c t iv e " h o u r re q u ire m e n t is w a iv e d fo r te rm in a t io n s d u e to d e a th o r
u n d e r th e E dison In te rn a tio n a l S everance P lan o r W o rk e r P ro te c tio n B e n e fits A g re e m e n t and re d u ce d to 40 "a c t iv e "
h o u rs fo r re tire e s .
Pay Used to Calculate 2012 RSPay used to c a lcu la te 2 0 1 2 RS a w a rd s is based on each e lig ib le e m p lo y e e 's e lig ib le e a rn in g s p a id in th e 20 1 2 p a y ro ll
c a le n d a r y e a r (n o t W 2 w ages) m u lt ip l ie d by th e e lig ib le e m p lo y e e 's a p p lic a b le ta rg e t a w a rd p e rce n ta g e . E lig ib le
e a rn in g s in c lu d e c o m p e n s a tio n fo r a ll a c tiv e h o u rs w o rk e d , as w e ll as so m e in a c t iv e h o u rs , in c lu d in g b u t n o t l im ite d
to pay fo r v a c a tio n , f lo a t in g ho lid ay , t im e o f f du e to illness, p a r tia l da y absences and so m e n o n -d is c re t io n a ry bonuses.
RS a w ards , d is c re t io n a ry b o nuses ( i f e lig ib le ) such as s p o t b o n u se s and A w a rd s to C e le b ra te E xce llence , seve rance
p a yo u ts , and n o n w a g e in c o m e (e .g ., F lex D o lla rs , re lo c a tio n expenses) th a t m ay be re ce ive d d u r in g 2 0 1 2 a re n o t
in c lu d e d in e lig ib le ea rn ing s .
Job Position and Organizational Unit Used for Award Calcu lationIf y o u ea rn a 2 0 1 2 RS a w a rd , i t w il l be based o n th e jo b c la s s ific a tio n and o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t yo u a re in as
o f D e c e m b e r 31, 2 0 12 . H ow eve r, if yo u a re on a te m p o ra ry w o rk a ss ig n m e n t (TW A) and have m o ve d to a lo w e r ta rg e t-
e lig ib le p o s it io n w ith in th e c a le n d a r year, yo u w il l re ce ive th e h ig h e r ta rg e t fo r th e year. For e xa m p le , i f yo u a re an
e x e m p t w h o a cce p ts a TW A to a n o n e x e m p t p o s it io n , yo u w il l s til l be e lig ib le fo r th e 8% ta rg e t p a y o u t. N e ve rth e le ss ,
i f yo u m o ve in to an o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t th a t ea rns a lo w e r p a y o u t th a n y o u r p re v io u s o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /
d e p a r tm e n t , yo u w ill re ce ive th e lo w e r p a y o u t. A w a rd s w il l n o t be p ro ra te d based o n th e t im e in each p o s it io n o r
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t .
If y o u ch a nged o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n its as p a r t o f th e Rate C ha lle nge e f fo r t to ce n tra liz e th e F inance and H um a n
R esources fu n c tio n s , y o u r b o n u s w ill be based o n th e o rg a n iza tio n yo u w e re in p r io r to th e o rg a n iz a tio n a l cha nge on
D e c e m b e r 17, 2012 .
If y o u tra n s fe r d u r in g th e y e a r to Edison In te rn a tio n a l o r its s u b s id ia ry c o m p a n y th a t is n o t SCE, yo u w ill re ce ive a
p ro ra te d a w a rd based on th e a c tiv e t im e in each in c e n tiv e p lan , if th a t t im e is 90 days o r m o re . I f th a t t im e is less th a n
90 days, th e e n tire a w a rd is based on th e p o s it io n and c o m p a n y yo u w e re in fo r th e m a jo r ity o f th e year.
6
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
82Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Pr o g r a m d e t a il s (c o n t .)
Program PayoutsA n y RS a w a rd s w il l be p a id as lu m p sum s d u r in g th e f i r s t q u a r te r o f 2 0 13 . A w a rd s w il l be s u b je c t to w ith h o ld in g as
s p e c if ie d by fe d e ra l and s ta te law . N o n re p re s e n te d m p lo y e e s w ith u n s a tis fa c to ry p e r fo rm a n c e (2 0 1 2 p e r fo rm a n c e
a p p ra isa l w ith o ve ra ll y e a r-e n d ra tin g s o f "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t/N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t" ) w il l n o t re ce ive a p a yo u t.
N o n re p re s e n te d e m p lo y e e s w h o s e 2 0 1 2 o ve ra ll y e a r-e n d p e r fo rm a n c e ra tin g s a re e ith e r "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t /
C o m m e n d a b le ," "C o m m e n d a b le /N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t," "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t / E x e m p la ry " o r "E x e m p la ry /N e e d s
Im p ro v e m e n t" w ill re ce ive a 50% p a y o u t o f th e a w a rd a m o u n t.
Program AdministrationT h e C o m p a n y rese rves th e r ig h t to change , a m e n d o r te rm in a te th e p ro g ra m a t any t im e . C o rp o ra te C o m p e n sa tio n
a d m in is te rs th e 2 0 1 2 RS p ro g ra m and in te rp re ts all p ro g ra m p ro v is io n s . I f y o u have q u e s tio n s , ca ll H u m a n R esources a t
2 3 4 5 6 o r (800) 5 0 0 -4 7 2 3 , and se le c t th e o p tio n fo r th e Em p lo ye e In fo rm a t io n C enter, o r e -m a il a t in fo c n tr@ s c e .c o m .
You can a lso call C o rp o ra te C o m p e n s a tio n a t 2 5 6 2 6 o r (626) 3 0 2 -5 6 2 6 .
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION83
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
84Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Pr o g r a m b a s ic s
W h a t is 2012 M anagem ent Incentive Program (MIP)?
S o u th e rn C a lifo rn ia E d ison is c o m m it te d to o ffe r in g e m p lo ye e s m a rk e t c o m p e t it iv e to ta l co m p e n s a tio n
o p p o r tu n it ie s . To ta l c o m p e n s a tio n con s is ts o f th re e c o m p le m e n ta ry e le m e n ts — base pay, v a r ia b le pay and
re c o g n it io n aw ards .
2 0 1 2 M IP is an a n n u a l v a r ia b le pay p ro g ra m th a t p ro v id es m a nage rs and s e n io r p ro fe ss io n a ls an o p p o r tu n ity to ea rn
a cash bo n u s based on p e rfo rm a n c e ag a in s t 1) C o m p a n y goa ls, 2) th e C o m p a n y o p e ra t io n s and m a in te n a n c e (O & M )
b u d g e t, 3) o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t goa ls , 4) o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M b u d g e t, and 5) in d iv id u a l
p e rfo rm a n c e .
2 0 1 2 M IP he lps yo u fo cu s on a c t iv it ie s th a t have an im p a c t — b o th d ire c t and in d ire c t — on th e C o m p a n y 's success.
Y our c o n tr ib u t io n s to c u s to m e r se rv ice , sa fe ty , co s t c o n tro l, e ff ic ie n c y and o th e r goa ls h e lp d r iv e SCE to w a rd th e
a c h ie v e m e n t o f its o p e ra t io n a l and f in a n c ia l ta rg e ts d u r in g th e 2 0 1 2 p e r fo rm a n c e p e r io d , w h ic h ru ns fro m Ja n u a ry 1,
2 0 1 2 th ro u g h D e c e m b e r 31, 2 0 12 . P a rtic ip a tio n in th is p ro g ra m g ives yo u a f in a n c ia l s take in a ch ie v in g th o s e ta rg e ts .
A n y e a rn e d 2 0 1 2 M IP p a yo u ts w ill be pa id in th e f i r s t q u a r te r o f 2013 .
W h a t determines the 2012 M IP payouts?
P ayou t leve ls a re based on th e fo l lo w in g to ta l ta rg e t b o n u s o p p o r tu n it ie s :
• 15% - 4 0 % * o f e lig ib le e a rn in g s fo r M IP T ie r O ne e m p lo ye e s (see p a g e 6)
• 15% o f e lig ib le e a rn in g s fo r M IP T ie r T w o e m p lo y e e s (see p a g e 6)
*T o ta l ta rg e t b o n u s o p p o r tu n it ie s va ry d e p e n d in g o n th e jo b . I f y o u w e re re c la ss ifie d in 2 0 1 2 as a re s u lt o f th e
S a la ry S tru c tu re Im p ro v e m e n t P ro je c t (SSIP) o r th e Rate C ha lle nge re o rg a n iz a tio n e ffo r ts , th e h ig h e r ta rg e t bo n u s
o p p o r tu n ity w ill be a p p lic a b le fo r th e 2 0 1 2 p e rfo rm a n c e year.
Above-target payouts m a y be a ch ie ve d i f 1) th e C o m p a n y a ch ie ves 18 o r m o re o f its 23 ta rg e te d 2 0 1 2 p e r fo rm a n c e
goa ls (see p a g e 5 ), 2) th e C o m p a n y com es in u n d e r its O & M b u d g e t, 3) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t ach ieves
a t le a s t 75% o f its 2 0 1 2 R esults S ha rin g (R S )/M IP goa ls , 4) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t do es n o t exceed its
O & M b u d g e t, a n d /o r 5) a w a rd a m o u n ts m a y a lso be inc reased fo r e m p lo y e e s based on in d iv id u a l p e rfo rm a n c e . The
f in a l a d ju s te d a w a rd m a y n o t exceed 150% o f th e to ta l ta rg e t b o n u s o p p o r tu n ity .
Below-target payouts m a y be a ch ie ve d i f 1) th e C o m p a n y ach ie ves fe w e r th a n 18 o f its 23 ta rg e te d 20 12
p e rfo rm a n c e goa ls , 2) th e C o m p a n y com es in o v e r its O & M b u d g e t, 3) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t ach ieves
less th a n 75% o f its 2 0 1 2 R esu lts S ha rin g (R S )/M IP goa ls , 4) y o u r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t exceeds its O & M
b u d g e t, a n d /o r 5) a w a rd a m o u n ts m a y a lso be a d ju s te d fo r e m p lo y e e s based on in d iv id u a l p e rfo rm a n c e .
A w a rd s m a y be lim ite d by th e a m o u n t a u th o r iz e d by th e 2 0 1 2 G en e ra l Rate Case.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION85
h o w 2012 m i p w o r k s
The funding of the 2012 MIP awards starts with a pool of dollars that equals eligible earnings multiplied by a participant's bonus target for all participants, limited by the amount authorized by the 2012 General Rate Case. The pool is then modified as follows:
Achievement of the 2012 Company goals:
Fu
nd
ing
Achievement of... Funding level...*
1 18 - 23 goa ls = T a rge t fu n d in g
F e w er th a n 18 goa ls = Less th a n ta rg e t fu n d in g*Limited by the amount authorized by the 2012 General Rate Case.
2Performance against 2012 Company O&M budget.T h e p o o l increases i f w e a re u n d e r b u d g e t and de crease s i f w e go o v e r b u d g e t.
The available pool of funding dollars is then allocated to each organizational unit/department based on the number of eligible participants in each organizational unit/department and their applicable target award percentages. Awards are paid as follows:
3 a
3 b
3c
Achievement of 2012 Company goals and Company O&M budget as set forth in Steps 1 & 2 above.
50% o f th e a llo c a tio n is n o t
s u b je c t to a d ju s tm e n t based on 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t goa ls.
Achievement of at least 75% of 2012 organizational unit/department RS/MIP goals.A c h ie v e m e n t o f less th a n 75% o f th e 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t R S /M IP goa ls w ill
re d u ce th is p o r t io n o f th e a w a rd p a y o u t .
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is s u b je c t to
a d ju s tm e n t based o n th e a c h ie v e m e n t
o f 2 0 1 2 o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
R S /M IP goals.
Performance against 2012 organizational unit/ department O&M budget. Exceed ing th e 20 12
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M b u d g e t w ill
e lim in a te th is p o r t io n o f th e a w a rd p a yo u t.
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a w a rd e d o n ly
i f an o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t
do es n o t exceed its O & M b u d g e t.
The award amount will then be adjusted based on individual performance:
Adjustment based on 2012 individual performance appraisals. A n y a d ju s tm e n t w ill be a p p lie d to 100%
o f th e a llo c a te d a w a rd a m o u n t. Th is m a y inc re ase o r
de c re a se fin a l a w a rd p a yo u ts . To ta l a w a rd s m a y n o t
exceed th e a llo c a te d po o l.
100% o f th e a w a rd a m o u n t is
s u b je c t to a d ju s tm e n t based u p o n 20 12
p e rfo rm a n c e appra isa ls .4
In o ther words... The entire funded pool amount is based on performance against Company goals and O&M budget a nd is allocated and paid as follows:
50% o f th e a llo c a tio n
is p a id based so le ly on th e
a c h ie v e m e n t o f C o m p a n y
goa ls and p e rfo rm a n c e a g a ins t
C o m p a n y O & M b u d g e t.
P \ 3 b
925% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a d ju s ta b le based
on p e r fo rm a n c e ag a in s t 2 0 1 2 o rg a n iz a tio n a l
u n it /d e p a r tm e n t R S /M IP goals.
25% o f th e a llo c a tio n is a w a rd e d o n ly
i f o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t O & M
b u d g e t goa l is m e t o r u n d e rs p e n t.
100% o f th e a w a rd a m o u n t is th e n a d ju s te d based on in d iv id u a l p e rfo rm a n c e .
2
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
86Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Ex a m p l e o f h o w 2012 m i p W o r k s
E x a m p le # 1
For illustration purposes, we will assume that the Company achieves 18 of its 2012 goals and meets the Company O&M budget. Your organizational unit/department achieves more than 75% of its 2012 RS/MIP goals and meets its O&M budget. You achieve commendable performance during 2012. This example is based upon an MIP Tier One employee with eligible earnings of $150,000 and 20% of total target bonus. Given this scenario, the 2012 MIP individual payout would be calculated as shown below:
Achievement of at least 18 Company goal s results in initial Company funding at the target level.
Eligible Earnings for this Target Award Initial CompanyMIP Tier One Employee Percentage Funding
x$ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 2 0 %
r$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 *
I
Achievement of the Company O&M budget results in no increase or decrea se to the initial Company funding.
Initial Company Funding
O&M Budget Outcome (Meets)
Final Company Funded Pool
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 + / - N o Im p a c t = $ 3 0 ,0 0 0
1
2
Unadjusted award based on Company performance
CompanyFunding Unadjusted percentage MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 5 0 % = $ 1 5 ,0 0 0
Achievement of 75% or more of organizational unit/department 2012 RS/MIP goals
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department RS/MIP goals MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 7 ,5 0 0
Achievement of organizational unit/department 2012 O&M budget
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational unit/department O&M budget MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 7 ,5 0 0
-► 3 a
Pay
ou
t C
om
po
ne
nts
3 b
-► 3c
Total award amount is multiplied by an Individual Performance Modifier based on your 2012 performance to arrive at your final award payout:
3 aPortion of
award based on Company performance
3 bPortion of award
adjusted to reflect organizational
unit / department performance
3cPortion of
award subject to elimination based on performa nce
against organizational
unit / department O&M budget
Individual Total Possible Performance
Award Modifier Final Award
$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 + $ 7 ,5 0 0 + $ 7 ,5 0 0 = $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 1 0 0 % = $ 3 0 ,0 0 0
4
*For illustration purposes only, percentage w ill vary based on actual achievement and may be limited by the dollar amount authorized by 2012 GRC.
3
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION87
Ex a m p l e o f h o w 2012 m i p W o r k s
E x a m p le # 2
For illustration purposes, we will assume that the Company achieves 18 of its 2012 goals and meets the Company O&M budget. Your organizational unit/department achieves more than 75% of its 2012 RS/MIP goals and exceeds its O&M budget. You achieve exemplary performance during 2012. This example is based upon an MIP Tier One employee with eligible earnings of $150,000 and 20% of total target bonus. Given this scenario, the 2012 MIP individual payout would be calculated as shown below:
3 a
3 b
3c
Achievement of at least 18 Company goal s results in initial Company funding at the target level.
Eligible Earnings for this Target Award Initial CompanyMIP Tier One Employee Percentage Funding
x$ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 2 0 %
f$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 *
I
Achievement of the Company O&M budget results in no increase or decrea se to the initial Company funding.
Initial Company Funding
O&M Budget Outcome (Meets)
Final Company Funded Pool
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 + / - N o Im p a c t = $ 3 0 ,0 0 0
Unadjusted award based on Company performance
CompanyFunding Unadjusted percentage MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 5 0 % = $ 1 5 ,0 0 0
Achievement of 75% or more of organizational unit/department 2012 RS/MIP goals
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational u nit/departm ent RS/MIP goals MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 2 5 % = $ 7 ,5 0 0
Achievement of organizational unit/department 2012 O&M budget
CompanyFunding
Percentage awarded to reflect achievement of 2012 organizational u nit/department O&M budget MIP Payout
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 x 0 %
O-toil
1
2
4
Total award amount is multiplied by an Individual Performance Modifier based on your 2012 performance to arrive at your final award payout:
3 aPortion of
award based on Company performance
3 bPortion of award
adjusted to reflect organizational
unit / department performance
3cPortion of
award subject to elimination based on performa nce
against organizational
unit / department O&M Budget
Individual Total Possible Performance
Award Modifier Final Award
$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 + $ 7 ,5 0 0 + $ 0 = $ 2 2 ,5 0 0 x 1 1 5 % = $ 2 5 ,8 7 5
*For illustration purposes only, percentage will vary based on actual achievement and may be lim ited by the dollar amount authorized by 2012 GRC.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
88Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
2012 R e su l t s Sh a r i n g / M I P C o m p a n y G o a l s
SCE must achieve 18 or more of these goals and meet the SCE O&M budget to fund the 2012 MIP award pool at target (m a y be lim ite d b y d o lla r a m o u n t a u th o r iz e d b y 20 1 2 GRC). D e ta ils on th e goa ls a re a va ila b le o n P o rta l: M y
C o m p a n y > V is io n , S tra te g y & G oa ls > O v e rv ie w > C o m p a n y G oa ls and 2 0 1 2 B usiness B rie fin g M a te r ia ls > 2 0 1 2 SCE Goals.
SAFETY • Im prove w orkp lace safety to achieve in ju ry free workp lace• No serious in juries to the public resul ting fro m system failures
COMPLIANCE • Build and m ainta in a com prehensive com pany-w ide Ethics and Compliance program w ith an emphasis on strengthening a cu ltu re o f com pliance
OPERATIONAL AND SERVICE EXCELLENCE
Customer Satisfaction• M a in ta in Service Delivery Satisfaction• M a in ta in Custom er Favorability
Reliability• M a in ta in Power Delivery custom er satisfaction and re liab ility perform ance• Effectively manage Power Supply ope rations
SONGS• Achieve targets fo r INPO perform ance ind ica tor index and (18 M on th ro lling average) capability fac to r• Achieve SONGS Regulatory Performance Goal
M ajor Capital Projects• M a in ta in m a jor projects w ith in curren tly com m itted scope, schedule and budget, sub ject to approved
changes, and successfully w iths tand any challenges to fu ll cost recovery• Obtain regulatory approval fo r the revised cost cap fo r Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project
(TRTP) th a t reflects f ina l engineering costs and fo r Devers Colorado River (DCR) updated cost estimates, as appropria te
DBESpend• Provide su ffic ien t opportun ities to increase purchases o f materials and services w ith Diverse Business
Enterprises
STRATEGICINITIATIVES
• Successfully im plem ent Rate Challenge program th a t produces a system average rate per k ilow a tt hour in line w ith target
• Achieve a fina l 2012 General Rate Case decision, at th e earliest possible date, consistent w ith SCE's capital investm ent forecast and operations
PUBLIC POLICY • Develop and execute a strategy fo r educating state policymakers, stakeholders and customers about the costs o f public policy programs and th e ir im pact on rates
• Im p lem ent com petitive principles to ensure acceptable CAISO Tariff Filing fo r 3rd Party Transmission Providers requ iring th e 3rd pa rty tran smission providers to bear an approp ria te share o f risks consistent w ith FERC O rder 1000
• Ensure effective policy decisions and re lated com m unica tion to advocate fo r fa ir and equitab le rules to m inim ize the costs o f SCE's procurem ent po rtfo lio , renewable in tegration and grid re liab ility costs
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Enterprise Risk Management Program• S trengthen com prehensive com pany-w ide Enterprise Risk M anagem ent program w ith an emphasis on
the com pany's risk m anagem ent cu ltu re and m itiga tion practices
Business Resiliency• Advance Edison's ab ility to rapidly res pond and manage th rough business d isruptions and catastrophic
events
PEOPLE AND CULTURE
• S trengthen pay fo r perform ance obje ctives by increasing the d iffe ren tia tion o f bonus and stock awards• Im prove representation o f e thn ic m ino rities and fem ales across executive population• Im p lem ent im provem ent plans to address areas o f weakness iden tified by w o rk environm ent reviews
FINANCIALPERFORMANCE
• Achieve th e core earnings ta rg e t*• Obtain a 2013 cost o f capital decision by Decem ber 31, 2012 th a t retains the key e lem ents o f the
existing cost o f capital mechanism, and provides a com pensatory authorized Return on Equity
*MIP excludes SCE Company Earning Per Share (EPS) goal.
5
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION89
Pr o g r a m d e t a il s
GeneralA ll M IP -le ve l SCE e m p lo y e e s w ith s a tis fa c to ry p e r fo rm a n c e m a y re ce ive an a w a rd fro m 2 0 1 2 M IP e xce p t te m p o ra ry
e m p lo y e e s and th o s e e m p lo y e e s p a rt ic ip a tin g in any o th e r a n n u a l bo n u s p ro g ra m d e s ig n e d to re p la ce 2 0 1 2 MIP.
EligibilityE lig ib le M IP Job C lass ifica tio ns :
T ie r One
A ll P rin c ip a l Level jo b s , in c lu d in g :
- P rin c ip a l A d v is o r
- P rin c ip a l P ro je c t M a n a g e r
- P rin c ip a l M a n a g e r
M a n a g e r 3
S e n io r A tto rn e y
A tto rn e y
T ie r Two
C o n su ltin g E n g in e e r 5
C o n su ltin g N u c le a r E n g in e e r 5
E nergy C o n tra c t/T ra d in g S pe c ia lis t 2, 3
E n g in e e r - T e le c o m m u n ic a tio n s 5
IT S p e c ia lis t/E n g in e e r 5
M a n a g e r 2
M a n a g e r P ro je c t /P ro d u c t 2
O rg a n iza tio n a l D e v e lo p m e n t C o n s u lta n t 4
Real T im e O p e ra tio n s M a n a g e r 1
R egion M a n a g e r 3
S tra te g ic Pl a n n in g M a n a g e r 2
Tax S pe c ia lis t 3
Active EmployeesA c tiv e e m p lo ye e s m u s t w o rk 5 2 0 "a c t iv e " h o u rs fo r SCE d u r in g th e 2 0 1 2 p a y ro ll c a le n d a r y e a r (Pay P e riod #1 be g ins on
D e c e m b e r 19, 2 0 11 , and Pay P eriod # 2 6 en ds o n D e c e m b e r 16, 20 1 2 ) and be on th e C o m p a n y 's p a y ro ll o n th e la s t day
o f th e b o n u s p e r io d (D e c e m b e r 31, 20 1 2 ) to be e lig ib le fo r an a w a rd . H ow eve r, i f y o u a re s u b s e q u e n tly te rm in a te d fo r
m is c o n d u c t o r p o o r p e r fo rm a n c e b e fo re p a yo u t, yo u w il l a u to m a tic a lly fo r fe i t any a w a rd .
Active / Inactive HoursT h e 5 2 0 "a c t iv e " h o u rs re q u ire d fo r e l ig ib il i ty fo r a c tiv e e m p loyees in c lu d e th o s e h o u rs w h e n yo u a re a c tiv e ly w o rk in g
a t y o u r jo b . H ou rs c o m p e n s a te d as C o m p a n y h o lid a ys a re al so in c lu d e d . H ou rs c o m p e n s a te d as pe rso n a l t im e o f f aw ay
f ro m w o rk (e .g., s ick t im e , v a c a tio n , f lo a t in g ho lid ay , p a rtia l da y absences) a re c o n s id e re d v o lu n ta ry o r " in a c t iv e h o u rs ,"
and d o n o t c o u n t to w a rd s th e 5 2 0 -h o u r e lig ib il i ty re q u ire m e n t.
Terminated EmployeesE m p loye es w h o s e e m p lo y m e n t is te rm in a te d d u r in g 20 1 2 d u e to re t ire m e n t, d e a th o r u n d e r th e c u r re n t Edison
In te rn a tio n a l S everance P lan o r W o rk e r P ro te c tio n B e n e fits A g re e m e n t m a y re ce ive a p ro ra te d a w a rd based on th e t im e
a c tiv e ly e m p lo y e d d u r in g 20 12 . T h e 52 0 "a c t iv e " h o u r re q u ire m e n t is w a iv e d fo r te rm in a t io n s d u e to d e a th o r u n d e r
th e E dison In te rn a tio n a l S everance Plan o r W o rk e r P ro te c t io n B e n e fits A g re e m e n t and re d u ce d to 4 0 "a c t iv e " h o u rs fo r
re tire e s .
Pay Used to Calculate 2012 MIPPay used to c a lc u la te 2 0 1 2 M IP a w a rd s is based o n each e lig ib le e m p lo y e e 's e lig ib le e a rn in g s p a id in th e 2 0 1 2 p a y ro ll
c a le n d a r y e a r (n o t W 2 w ages) m u lt ip l ie d by th e e m p lo y e e 's a p p lic a b le ta rg e t a w a rd p e rce n ta g e . E lig ib le e a rn in g s in c lu d e
c o m p e n s a tio n fo r a ll a c tiv e h o u rs w o rk e d , as w e ll as s o m e in a c tiv e h o u rs , in c lu d in g b u t n o t l im ite d to pay fo r va ca tio n ,
f lo a t in g h o lid ay , t im e o f f d u e to illness and p a rtia l da y absen ces. M IP aw a rd s , d is c re t io n a ry b o nuses such as s p o t bo nuses
and A w a rd s to C e le b ra te E xce llence , seve rance p a yo u ts , and n o n w a g e in c o m e (e .g ., F lex D o lla rs , re lo c a tio n expenses)
th a t m a y be re ce ive d d u r in g 2 0 1 2 a re n o t in c lu d e d in e lig ib le e a rn ing s .
6
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
90Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Pr o g r a m d e t a il s (c o n t .)
Job Position and Organizational Unit Used for Award CalculationI f y o u e a rn a 2 0 1 2 M IP a w a rd , i t w il l be based o n th e jo b c la s s ific a tio n and o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t yo u a re
in as o f D e c e m b e r 31, 2 0 12 . H ow eve r, if yo u a re on a te m p o ra ry w o rk a ss ig n m e n t (TW A) and have m o ve d to a lo w e r
ta rg e t-e lig ib le p o s it io n w ith in th e c a le n d a r year, yo u w il l rec e ive th e h ig h e r ta rg e t fo r th e year. For e xa m p le , i f y o u are
a M IP T ie r O ne e m p lo y e e w h o a cce p ts a TW A to a M IP T ie r T w o p o s it io n , yo u w il l s t ill be e lig ib le fo r th e h ig h e r ta rg e t
p a yo u t. N e ve rth e le ss , i f yo u m o ve in to an o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t th a t ea rns a lo w e r p a y o u t th a n y o u r p re v io u s
o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t , yo u w ill re ce ive th e lo w e r p a y o u t. A w a rd s w il l n o t be p ro ra te d based o n th e t im e in
each p o s it io n o r o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n it /d e p a r tm e n t .
I f y o u ch a n g e d o rg a n iz a tio n a l u n its as p a rt o f th e Rate C ha lle nge e f fo r t to ce n tra liz e th e F inance and H um a n
R esources fu n c tio n s , y o u r b o n u s w il l be based o n th e o rgan i za tio n yo u w e re in p r io r to th e o rg a n iz a tio n a l cha nge on
D e c e m b e r 17, 20 12 .
If y o u tra n s fe r d u r in g th e y e a r to E dison In te rn a tio n a l o r its s u b s id ia ry c o m p a n y th a t is n o t SCE, yo u w ill re ce ive a
p ro ra te d a w a rd based o n th e a c tiv e t im e in each in c e n tiv e p lan , i f t h a t t im e is 90 days o r m o re . If th a t t im e is less th a n
90 days, th e e n tire a w a rd is based o n th e p o s it io n and c o m p a n y y o u w e re in fo r th e m a jo r ity o f th e year.
Program PayoutsA n y M IP a w a rd s w il l be p a id as lu m p sum s d u r in g th e f ir s t q u a r te r o f 2 0 13 . A w a rd s w ill be s u b je c t to w ith h o ld in g as
sp e c if ie d b y fe d e ra l and s ta te law . M IP e m p lo ye e s w ith u n s a tis fa c to ry p e r fo rm a n c e (2 012 p e rfo rm a n c e a p p ra isa l w ith
o ve ra ll y e a r-e n d ra tin g s o f "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t/N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t" ) w il l n o t re ce ive a p a yo u t. E m p loye es w h o s e
20 1 2 o ve ra ll y e a r-e n d p e r fo rm a n c e ra tin g s a re e ith e r "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t/C o m m e n d a b le ," "C o m m e n d a b le /N e e d s
Im p ro v e m e n t," "N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t/E x e m p la ry " o r "E x e m p la ry /N e e d s Im p ro v e m e n t" w ill re ce ive u p to 50% p a y o u t o f
th e a w a rd a m o u n t.
Program AdministrationTh e C o m p a n y re se rves th e r ig h t to change , a m e n d o r te rm in a te th e p ro g ra m a t any t im e . C o rp o ra te C o m p e n sa tio n
a d m in is te rs 2 0 1 2 R esu lts S h a r in g /M IP and in te rp re ts a ll p ro g ra m p ro v is io n s . If y o u have q u e s tio n s , call H u m a n R esources
a t 2 3 4 5 6 o r (800) 5 0 0 -4 7 2 3 , and se le c t th e o p t io n fo r th e E m p lo ye e In fo rm a t io n C enter, o r e -m a il a t in fo c n tr@ s c e .c o m .
You can a lso call C o rp o ra te C o m p e n s a tio n a t 2 5 6 2 6 o r (626) 3 0 2 -5 6 2 6 .
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION91
EDISON INTERNATIONAL
EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is in the best interest of Edison International and its affiliates to offer and maintain competitive executive compensation programs designed to attract and retain qualified executives;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that providing financial incentives to executives that reinforce and recognize corporate, organizational and individual performance and accomplishments will enhance the financial and operational performance of Edison International and its affiliates; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that an incentive compensation program would encourage the attainment of short-term corporate goals and objectives;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Edison International Executive Incentive Compensation Plan has been established by the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee o f the Board o f Directors originally effective January 1, 1997, and made available to eligible executives o f Edison International and its participating affiliates subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. Definitions. When capitalized herein, the following terms are defined as indicated:
"Board" means the Board o f Directors of a Company.
"CEO" means the chief executive officer o f a Company.
"Chairman" means the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Edison International.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"Company" means Edison International or a participating affiliate.
"Committee" means the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee o f the Edison International Board of Directors. Where the context requires with respect to officers and other participating employees of Southern California Edison Company, “Committee” shall also mean the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee of the Southern California Edison Company Board of Directors.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
92Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
"Participant" means the Chairman, president, executive vice presidents, senior vice presidents, elected vice presidents, and senior managers whose participation in this Plan has been approved by the Committee, Chairman or Board.
"Plan" means the Edison International Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
2. Eligibility. To be eligible for the full amount of any incentive award, an individual must have been a Participant for the entire calendar year. Pro-rata awards may be distributed to Participants who retired or became disabled during the calendar year, hi the event of the death of a Participant during the calendar year, a pro-rata award may be made at the discretion of the Committee, the Board, or CEO having the authority to approve the Participant's award had the death not occurred. In the event an individual first becomes a Participant after the start of the calendar year, a pro-rata award may be made at the discretion of the Committee, the Board, or CEO having the authority to approve the Participant's award.
3. Company Performance Goals. Each CEO will furnish recommended Company performance goals to the Chairman. In consultation with the Chairman, the Committee will select specific performance goals for the year. The performance goals must represent relatively optimistic, but reasonably attainable goals, the accomplishment o f which will contribute significantly to the attainment of Company strategic objectives.
4. Individual Incentive Award Levels. Company, organizational and individual performance relative to the pre-established goals will determine the award a Participant can receive. The Committee will establish target award levels for the year as a percentage of base salary at the time performance goals are set (and/or at such later time when the individual first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan or is eligible to receive a higher/lower target award level under the Plan because of a promotion/demotion or other approved reason). Any incentive awards becoming payable to Participants who are promoted during the calendar year after the first quarter or otherwise become entitled to receive a higher/lower base salary and/or target award level under the Plan during the calendar year after the first quarter may be calculated based on the Participant’s weighted average base salary and target award level, taking into account the base salary and target award level as of the end of the first quarter and the base salary and target award level(s) during the remainder of the calendar year. All awards are discretionary and will be based on the assessment of corporate and individual performance by the Committee or the CEO.
5. Approval and Payment of Individual Awards. During the first quarter o f the year following the completion of the calendar year, the Chairman, in consultation with each CEO, will assess the degree to which individual and corporate goals and objectives have been achieved. Incentive award recommendations for eligible officers will he developed. The Committee will receive a report from the Chairman as to overall Company performance, will deliberate on management recommendations, and will approve, or recommend for approval by the applicable Board, the officer awards. Awards to nonofficers will be determined and approved by the CEO of each Company, or his/her
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION93
designee. All decisions o f the Committee, the Chairman and the CEOs regarding individual incentive awards will be final and conclusive.
Incentive award payments will be made as soon as practical following the appropriate approval (and in all events within two and one-half months after the end of the calendar year to which the award relates). Payment will be made in cash except to the extent an eligible Participant has previously elected to defer payment o f some or all of the award pursuant to the terms of a deferred compensation plan of the Company. Awards made will be subject to any income or payroll tax withholding or other deductions as may required by Federal, State or local law.
Awards under this Plan will not be considered to be salary or other compensation for the purpose of computing benefits to which the Participant may be entitled under any qualified Company retirement plan, including but not limited to the SCE Retirement Plan, the Edison 401 (k) Savings Plan, or any other plan or arrangement o f the Company for the benefit of its employees if such plan or arrangement is a plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and is a trust exempt from Federal income tax under Section 501(a) of the Code. Awards may be considered compensation for nonqualified plan purposes depending on the terms and conditions of the particular nonqualified plan.
Awards payable to Participants under this Plan shall constitute an unsecured general obligation of the Company, and no special fund or trust will be created, nor will any notes or securities be issued with respect to any awards.
6. Plan Modifications and Adjustments. In order to ensure the incentive features of the Plan, avoid distortion in its operation and compensate for or reflect extraordinary changes which may have occurred during the calendar year, the Committee may make adjustments to the Company performance goals or other Plan terms and conditions before, during or after the end of the calendar year to the extent it determines appropriate in its sole discretion. Adjustments to the Plan shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties concerned. The Plan may be modified or terminated by the Committee at any time.
7. Plan Administration, This Plan and any officer awards made pursuant to it are to be approved by the Committee or the Board of the participating affiliate after review by the Committee, Each CEO, or his/her delegate, shall approve any non-officer awards. Administration of the Plan is otherwise delegated to the senior officer of Edison International responsible for Human Resources and designees acting under his/her direction. Such officer is authorized to approve ministerial amendments to the Plan, to interpret Plan provisions, and to approve changes as may be required by law or regulation. No Company, Board, Committee or individual shall be liable to any person for any action taken or omitted in connection with the interpretation and administration of the Plan.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
94Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
8. Successors and Assigns. This Plan shall he binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the Company and Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any right to receive payment hereunder is hereby expressly declared to be personal, nonassignable and nontransferable, except by will, intestacy, or as otherwise required by law, and in the event of any attempted assignment, alienation or transfer o f such rights contrary to the provisions hereof, the Company shall have no further liability for payments hereunder.
9. Beneficiaries. Any award approved following the death of a Participant will be made to the Participant's most recently designated beneficiary or beneficiaries under the 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (or any successor equity incentive plan) of the Company. If no beneficiary has been designated by the Participant, or if no beneficiary survives the Participant, or if a designated beneficiary should die after surviving the Participant but before the award has been paid, any award approved will be paid in a lump-sum payment to the Participant's estate as soon as practicable.
10. Capacity. If any person entitled to payments under this Plan is incapacitated and unable to use such payments in his or her own best interest, the Company may direct that payments (or any portion) be made to that person's legal guardian or conservator, or that person's spouse, as an alternative to the payment to the person unable to use the payments. Court-appointed guardianship or conservatorship may be required by the Company before payment is made. The Company shall have no obligation to supervise the use of such payments.
11. No Right of Employment. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring upon the Participant the right to continue in the employ of the Company as an officer or manager of the Company or in any other capacity.
12. Severability and Controlling Law. The various provisions of this Plan are severable in their entirety. Any determination of invalidity or unenforceability of any one provision will have no effect on the continuing force and effect of the remaining provisions. This Plan shall be governed by the laws o f the State of California.
13. Section 409A. This Plan shall be construed and interpreted to comply with Section 409A o f the Code.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION95
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
96Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION97
Beginning of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
Forecast Method Chosen
2012$ (000)
Recorded2012
Forecast2015
Labor Itemized Forecast 18,943 18,181Non-Labor N/A 0 0Other N/A 0 0Total 18,943 18,181
Description of Activity:
Long-term incentive expense includes accruals required under the FAS123R rules for equity and liability accounting for stock-based compensation, for outstanding long-term incentive awards such as non-qualified stock options, performance shares, and restricted stock units.
Final Cost Centers included in this activity (See Appendix A for additional detail):
F526552 F990200
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
98Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
DETERMINATION OF RECORDED/ADJUSTED
Recorded Period
FERC Form 1 Recorded (Nominal $)Labor
Non-Labor
Other
Total
Labor
Non-Labor
Other
Total
Recorded/Adjusted (Nominal $)Labor
Non-Labor
Other
Total
Escalation:Labor
Non-Labor
Other
$ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
19 20,136 25,888 20,442 18,943
106 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
125
il
20,136 25,888 20,442 18,943
18,224 0 0 0 0
(106) 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
18,118 0 0 0 0
18,243 20,136 25,888 20,442 18,943
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
18,243 20,136 25,888 20,442 18,943
1.1414 1.1070 1.0701 1.0327 1.0000
1.0932 1.0743 1.0518 1.0240 1.0000
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
20,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 020,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$)
Labor
Non-Labor
OtherTotal
Recorded Adjusted 2008-2012 (2012$)
28,000
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
02008 2009 2010 2011 2012
□ Labor (std escl) I Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION99
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
Forecasting M ethods - Sum m ary o f R esults o f all M ethods S tud ied - 2012$ (000)
2 R ecorded Years (2011 - 2012):Results of Averaging (A2)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 20,027 20,027 20,027 1,084 no
Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 no
Other 0 0 0 0 noTotal 20,027 20,027 20,027 n/a n/a
3 Recorded Years (2010 - 2012):
Results of Linear Trending (T3) Results of Averaging (A3)
2013 2014 | 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 13,827 9,447 5,068 0.92 no 22,585 22,585 22,585 3,725 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 13,827 9,447 5,068 n/a n/a 22,585 22,585 22,585 n/a n/a
4 R ecorded Years (2009 - 2012):Results of Linear Trending (T4) Results of Averaging (A4)
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen
Labor 18,353 16,690 15,027 0.33 no 22,512 22,512 22,512 3,228 noNon-Labor 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 noOther 0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
Total 18,353 16,690 15,027 n/a n/a 22,512 22,512 22,512 n/a n/a
5 Recorded Years (2008 - 2012):Results of Linear Trending (T5) Results of Averaging (A5)
LaborNon-LaborOtherTotal
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | r2* 1 Chosen
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | sd** | Chosen20,692 20,198 19,704 0.06 no 22,174 22,174 22,174 2,965 no
0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no0 0 0 0.00 no 0 0 0 0 no
20,692 20,198 19,704 n/a n/a 22,174 22,174 22,174 n/a n/a
O ther M ethods:
Last Recorded Year (LRY) Itemized Forecast (IF)
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
COoCM ^roCM 2015 | | Chosen 2013 |
^roCM 2015 | | Chosen18,943 18,943 18,943 no 19,590 18,918 18,181 yes
0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no0 0 0 no 0 0 0 no
18,943 18,943 18,943 n/a 19,590 18,918 18,181 n/a
Forecast A d jus tm en ts :Base Forecast Method Adjustments*
LaborNon-LaborOther
Total
Method
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 |
COoCM ^r
oCM 2015 | |IF 19,590 18,918 18,181 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
19,590 18,918 18,181 0 0 0
r2 = R Squared (Based on recorded years data) sd = standard deviation (Based on recorded years data) See Appendix B For Additional Detail
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
100Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
Results:
Fo recasting R esults
Method Selected 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |Labor Itemized Forecast 19,590 18,918 18,181
Non-Labor N/A 0 0 0Other N/A 0 0 0
Total 19,590 18,918 18,181
A na lys is o f Fo recasting M ethods
Analysis of Linear Trending Method:In D.89-12-057, the CPUC stated that if recorded expenses in an account have shown a trend in a certain direction over three or more years, the last recorded year is an appropriate base estimate. Recorded expenses in this activity have not shown a trend in a certain direction; therefore, last recorded year is not an appropriate base estimate. See itemized forecast method analysis.
Analysis of Averaging Method:In D.89-12-057, the CPUC stated that for those accounts that have significant fluctuations in recorded expenses from year to year, an average of recorded expenses is appropriate. Although expenses have fluctuated over the recorded period, the averaging forecast methodology is not appropriate because: (1) expense for the year 2008 was affected by transition rules under FAS123R, (2) 2010 expense relates to a population of employees no longer eligible for long term incentives, and (3) it does not take into account the expected change in the grant eligible pop ulation. See itemized forecast method analysis.
Analysis of Last Recorded Year (2012):In D.89-12-057, the CPUC stated that if recorded expenses in an accou nt have been relatively stable for three or more years, the last recorded year is an appropriate base estimate. Recorded expenses have not been relatively stable; therefore, last recorded year is not an appropriate base estimate. See itemized forecast method analysis.
Analysis of Itemized Forecast Method:The itemized method is appropriate because it takes into account: (1) the vesting schedules of all grants, (2) the expected changes in the grant-eligible population, and (3) expected rates of forfeiture (canceled prior to vesting).
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION101
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
28,000
24.000
20.000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
Recorded 2008-2012 / Forecast 2013-2015 2012$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
□ Labor (std escl) ■ Non-Labor (std escl) □ Other (not escl)
Recorded Period$ (000)
Forecast Expenses (constant 2012$) 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 2013 | 2014 | 2015Labor (standard escalation) 20,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943 19,590 18,918 18,181Non-Labor (standard escalation) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other (not escalatable) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 20,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943 19,590 18,918 18,181
Labor Prior year Total 18,943 19,590 18,918
Change 647 (672) (737)Total 18,943 19,590 18,918 18,181
Non-Labor Prior year Total 0 0 0Change 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Other Prior year Total 0 0 0
Change 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0
Total Change |Labor 647 (672) (737)
Non-Labor 0 0 0Other 0 0 0
Total N/A 647 (672) (737)
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
102Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personn el (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2012 - 2013
Labor: 647
The increase is due to: (1) the vesting schedules of all grants; (2) the expected changes in the grant-eligible population; and (3) expected rates of forfeiture (cancelled p rior to vesting).
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION103
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salarie s/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personnel (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2013 - 2014
Labor: (672)
The decrease is due to: (1) the vesting schedules of all grants; (2) the expected changes in the grant-eligible population; and (3) expected rates of forfeiture (cancelled prior to vesting).
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
104Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
This page shows the changes in Labor, Non-Labor, and Other expenditures forecast during 2013 through 2015, including reasons for the addition of personn el (labor), increased office supplies required due to an increase in activity (non-labor).
2014 - 2015____________________________________________________________________________________
Labor: (737)
The decrease is due to: (1) the vesting schedules of all grants; (2) the expected changes in the grant-eligible population; and (3) expected rates of forfeiture (cancelled p rior to vesting).
Non-Labor: 0
Not applicable.
Other: 0
Not applicable.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION105
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
Jacqueline Trapp
APPENDIX A
Detail Description of F inal Cost Centers Included in Th is Activity
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
106Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salari es/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
Activity: LONG TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
Description of Final Cost Centers included in this activity:
F526552 LONG TERM INCENTIVE (LTI) ACCRUAL EXPENSELong-term incentive expense includes accruals required under the FAS123R rules for equity and liability accounting for stock-based compensation, for outstanding long-term incentive awards such as non-qualified stock options, performance shares, and restricted stock units.
F990200 GENERAL LEDGER CONVERSIONExpenses charged directly to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) account and not to a specific final cost center.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION107
FERC A ccoun t
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
Recorded/Adjusted (Constant 2012$) By Final Cost Center$ (000)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
Jacqueline Trapp
F526552 LONG TERM INCENTIVE (LTI) ACCRUAL 20,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943EXPENSE
F990200 GENERAL LEDGER CONVERSION 0 0 0 0 0
Total 20,823 22,291 27,702 21,111 18,943
** Due to rounding, totals may not tie to other workpaper pages.
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
108Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION109
FERC A ccoun t:
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
920,921 Adm inistrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
Jacqueline Trapp
APPENDIX B
Detail of Total Company Adjustments to Recorded
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
110Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Sala ries/Office Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity : LO N G TERM INCENTIVES
W itness: Jacqueline Trapp
Detail o f Total C om pany A d j ustm ents to Recorded Expenses
| A d js - (Nom inal $) $ (000)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Labor 18,224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor (106) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 18,118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 1 A&G HRADMIN-RMA-OU-PERFSHARE XFER
This adjustment transfers costs from Executive Officers 920-921 to Long Term Incentives 920-921.
Labor 11,897 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 11,897 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 2 A&G FINC-RSL.RMA-OUX-CNTRLS 2ND QTR FAS 123-R
This adjustment transfers FAS-123R related expense from Financial Services M iscellaneous Expenses 920-921 to Long Term Incentives 920-921.
Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor 6,221 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other______________________ 0__________0__________ 0________ 0___________0__________0___________ 0__________ 0 _Total 6,221 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Organizational Unit Adjustm ent 3 A&G HRADMIN-RMA-OU-LTI NON-LABOR TO LABOR TRNSFR
For forecasting purposes, this adjustment moves long-term incentive costs recorded in non-labor to labor.
Labor 6,327 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non-Labor (6,327) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
Pro
ject
ed T
otal
Act
ual/P
roje
cted
G
rant
Val
ue a
fter
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__P
roje
cted
Ann
ual
Exp
ense
Pro
ject
ion
of A
ccru
al E
xpen
se f
or
Exe
cuti
ve L
TI,
SC
E
Gra
nt D
ate
Val
ue*
Forfe
iture
@ 8
%*
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Per
form
ance
Sha
res
(PS)
2011
PS
$5,8
42,4
21$5
,375
,027
$1,8
97,0
68$0
$0$0
$0$0
$020
12 P
S$5
,415
,490
$4,9
82,2
51$1
,758
,441
$1,7
58,4
41$0
$0$0
$0$0
2013
PS
$4,9
25,0
16$4
,531
,014
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
$1,5
99,1
82$0
$0$0
$020
14 P
S$4
,925
,016
$4,5
31,0
14$0
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
$1,5
99,1
82$0
$0$0
2015
PS
$4,9
25,0
16$4
,531
,014
$0$0
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
$1,5
99,1
82$0
$020
16 P
S$4
,925
,016
$4,5
31,0
14$0
$0$0
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
$1,5
99,1
82$0
2017
PS
$4,9
25,0
16$4
,531
,014
$0$0
$0$0
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
$1,5
99,1
8220
18 P
S$4
,925
,016
$4,5
31,0
14$0
$0$0
$0$0
$1,3
32,6
51$1
,599
,182
2019
PS
$4,9
25,0
16$4
,531
,014
$0$0
$0$0
$0$0
$1,3
32,6
51$4
,988
,161
$4,6
90,2
74$4
,531
,014
$4,5
31,0
14$4
,531
,014
$4,5
31,0
14$4
,531
,014
Res
trict
ed S
tock
Uni
ts (
RS
Us)
2011
RSU
$5,3
12,0
46$4
,833
,962
$1,7
06,1
04$0
$0$0
$0$0
$020
12 R
SU$5
,409
,374
$4,9
22,5
31$1
,737
,364
$1,7
37,3
64$0
$0$0
$0$0
2013
RSU
$4,9
20,0
66$4
,477
,261
$1,3
16,8
41$1
,580
,210
$1,5
80,2
10$0
$0$0
$020
14 R
SU$4
,920
,066
$4,4
77,2
61$0
$1,3
16,8
41$1
,580
,210
$1,5
80,2
10$0
$0$0
2015
RSU
$4,9
20,0
66$4
,477
,261
$0$0
$1,3
16,8
41$1
,580
,210
$1,5
80,2
10$0
$020
16 R
SU$4
,920
,066
$4,4
77,2
61$0
$0$0
$1,3
16,8
41$1
,580
,210
$1,5
80,2
10$0
2017
RSU
$4,9
20,0
66$4
,477
,261
$1,3
16,8
41$1
,580
,210
$1,5
80,2
1020
18 R
SU$4
,920
,066
$4,4
77,2
61$1
,316
,841
$1,5
80,2
1020
19 R
SU$4
,920
,066
$4,4
77,2
61$1
,316
,841
$4,7
60,3
09$4
,634
,415
$4,4
77,2
61$4
,477
,261
$4,4
77,2
61$4
,477
,261
$4,4
77,2
61O
ptio
ns20
10 O
ptio
ns$1
0,92
7,85
6$9
,944
,349
$2,4
86,0
87$0
$0$0
$0$0
$020
11 O
ptio
ns$1
1,67
9,86
5$1
0,62
8,67
7$2
,657
,169
$2,6
57,1
69$0
$0$0
$0$0
2012
Opt
ions
$10,
820,
496
$9,8
46,6
52$2
,461
,663
$2,4
61,6
63$2
,461
,663
$0$0
$0$0
2013
Opt
ions
$9,8
33,0
47$8
,948
,073
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$0$0
$020
14 O
ptio
ns$9
,833
,047
$8,9
48,0
73$0
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$0$0
2015
Opt
ions
$9,8
33,0
47$8
,948
,073
$0$0
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$020
16 O
ptio
ns$9
,833
,047
$8,9
48,0
73$0
$0$0
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
2017
Opt
ions
$9,8
33,0
47$8
,948
,073
$2,2
37,0
18$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
1820
18 O
ptio
ns$9
,833
,047
$8,9
48,0
73$2
,237
,018
$2,2
37,0
1820
19 O
ptio
ns$9
,833
,047
$8,9
48,0
73$2
,237
,018
$9,8
41,9
37$9
,592
,868
$9,1
72,7
17$8
,948
,073
$8,9
48,0
73$8
,948
,073
$8,9
48,0
73
Tota
l Pro
ject
ed L
TI E
xpen
se$1
9,59
0,40
8$1
8,91
7,55
7$1
8,18
0,99
2$1
7,95
6,34
7$1
7,95
6,34
7$1
7,95
6,34
7$1
7,95
6,34
7
‘Ass
umpt
ions
:S
ame
perc
enta
ges
of s
alar
y ra
tes
as 2
012
0% a
nnua
l gro
wth
in e
ligib
le p
opul
atio
n (s
ame
as g
row
th in
ove
rall
empl
oyee
pop
ulat
ion)
2012
dol
lars
(i.e
., no
esc
alat
ion-
assu
mes
sal
ary
incr
ease
s w
ill b
e eq
ual t
o la
bor
esca
latio
n fa
ctor
)G
rant
s m
ade
in e
arly
Mar
ch e
ach
year
3-ca
lend
ar-y
ear c
liff v
estin
g fo
r pe
rform
ance
sha
res
and
RS
Us
and
4-ca
lend
ar-y
ear
grad
ed v
estin
g fo
r opt
ions
P
erfo
rman
ce s
hare
pay
out s
ame
as in
itial
gra
nt v
alue
and
exp
ense
spr
ead
even
ly fo
r the
hal
f pay
able
in c
ash
Sev
eran
ce a
nd r
etire
men
t ves
ting
term
s sa
me
as fo
r 20
12 g
rant
s P
erfo
rman
ce s
hare
and
RS
U fo
rfeitu
re r
ate
estim
ated
bas
ed o
n 20
10-2
012
gran
ts
Not
e:
Giv
en th
e re
cent
cha
nges
in e
xecu
tive
popu
latio
n, t
he c
alcu
latio
ns a
bove
use
s 20
13 M
arch
aw
ard
with
a 8
% a
djus
tmen
t for
off-
cycl
e aw
ards
.
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-V Witnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
SO
UTH
ER
N C
ALI
FOR
NIA
ED
ISO
N C
OM
PA
NY
FAS
123R
RE
CO
RD
ED
EX
PE
NS
E20
06 -
2012
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Tota
l
Sto
ck O
ptio
ns24
,249
,996
14,5
65,1
5514
,082
,913
7,70
6,60
910
,177
,428
8,91
4,80
810
,154
,844
89,8
51,7
53
Per
form
ance
Sha
res
Equ
ity3,
218,
136
2,29
8,27
62,
142,
283
1,95
5,55
52,
447,
893
2,21
6,66
52,
538,
981
16,8
17,7
89Li
abili
ty5,
691,
973
4,66
6,31
2(1
,999
,051
)1,
145,
444
3,56
3,05
566
0,02
482
6,83
114
,554
,588
Ret
entio
n D
SU
291,
851
392,
680
(20,
836)
(193
,309
)56
6,99
84,
050,
756
51,3
495,
139,
489
Res
tric
ted
Sto
ck U
nits
1,30
5,37
72,
243,
244
3,30
6,98
94,
500,
455
4,41
6,14
35,
056,
116
20,8
28,3
24
DS
Us
1,98
0,51
11,
670,
230
6,16
7,30
15,
358,
859
15,1
76,9
01
G/L
rec
onci
ling
item
47,0
0047
,000
Sto
ck O
ptio
n D
iffer
entia
l(7
27,7
46)
183,
706
314,
730
(229
,310
)
33,4
51,9
5625
,208
,311
18,1
18,7
8320
,135
,589
25,8
86,9
4220
,442
,102
18,9
42,8
5116
2,18
6,53
5
N3
w:\f
inan
cial
com
plia
nce\
fas1
23rs
asap
p\20
12_2
014g
rc\r
ecor
dede
xp20
06_2
009
7/9/
2013
11:
58 A
M
c.s.
san
ico
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION113
End of Workpapers for:
FERC A ccoun t: 920,921 Administrative and General Salaries/O ffice Supplies and Expenses
A c tiv ity :
W itness:
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
Jacqueline Trapp
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp
114Workpaper - Southern California Edison / 2015 GRC - APPLICATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Exhibit No. SCE-06 / Human Resources / Vol. 02 / Pt.01 / Ch. IV-VWitnesses: M. Bennett and J. Trapp