S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

44
S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4

Transcript of S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

Page 1: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Week 4

Page 2: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Page 3: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Most Basic Principle Guiding Your Decisions:

• will it Increase Demand for Product

• Decrease Cost of Mfgg Product

Page 4: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Increase Product Demand Driven by Effective Mgt of 4 P’s

• Product Mgt.– Introducing new brands,

Repositioning / killing old brands • Promotional Mgt.

– Optimizing Segment & Media Vehicle budget allocations

• Distribution Mgt.– Optimizing Outside & Inside Sales-

force size & segment allocations &– Manufacturer-Rep support / Distributor

relationship building allocations• Pricing-

– Competitive pricing & Fine-tune A/R

Page 5: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Decrease Mfgg Costs

Effective Mgt of two other P’s:

• People– Investments in HR,TQM & PI

• Plant– Investments in automation &

capacity mgt.

Page 6: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Increase Demand

• Driven by Effective Mgt of 4 P’s

Page 7: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Product Mgt. Options

For every product you market-you have 3 options-

• Improve it- to increase demand in current segment

• Reposition it – to compete in another segment

• Kill it- sell off capacity- reinvest recovered capital

For every product you market-you have 3 options-

• Improve it- to increase demand in current segment

• Reposition it – to compete in another segment

• Kill it- sell off capacity- reinvest recovered capital

Kill

Rep

ositio

n

Imp

rove

Page 8: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Consequences:Improving a product…

PRO’s:• Should increase

sales & market share

• Rightsizing capacity-– if too high-frees capital

for investment– If too low- forestalls

stockouts

Con’s:• Proffering a better-

price, design and/or higher awareness- accessibility- costs $$$

• High Tech segments can take 2+ years-

• Increases SG&A budgets & thus squeezes margins…

Page 9: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Questions need to answer if plan on improving a product…

1. What are your limits -How much can you cut price? Increase R&D… Promotion… Sales Budget?

2. Competitor moves- improving existing brands in seg. and/or introducing new brands in seg.

Page 10: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Variation on Improving… Can Reposition

Can allow product to age gracefully and ride the

life cycle

Can redirect trajectory of brand position into adjacent segment

Page 11: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Questions need to answer if plan on repositioning a product…

1. How long will it take?

2. Material & labor cost implications?

3. Impact on products in segment entering? Leaving?

Page 12: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

In final analysis– You Could decide to Kill

Page 13: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Questions need to answer if plan on Killing a product…

1. How many products do you plan to have overall?

2. Going to add a replacement in this or another segment?

3. Kill immediately-or phase out?

4. Other options- Improve? Reposition?

5. How will competitors react?

Page 14: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Consequences:Killing a product…

1) Makes it difficult maintain Overall Market Share– Even if Niche strategy-

should increase share in selected niche(s) to offset loss in abandoned segments…

• Investors-like to see Co. maintain overall starting share….

Page 15: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Consequences:Killing a product…

If not replaced:

2) Hands over Market Share to competitors

3) Removes strategic opportunity for distribution $$ efficiencies….

Page 16: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Segment Consequences: Killing a product…

• LOW TECH Segments: Kill the Cash Cow

– In opening years 2/3’s volume & profit from Low & traditional sectors

• HIGH TECH Segments: Difficult to re-enter, could take

up to 3 years to launch new prdt.

Page 17: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Your & Your Competitors Product Mgt. Decisions

Impact nature, magnitude & arena of Competition

Must monitor & anticipate what, where & when… products repositioned, killed, introduced

Page 18: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Let’s assume……

• LOW END: 0-1 product killed.. 0-1 repositioned or introduced

• TRADITIONAL: 3-6 repositioned from High…0-1 killed…1-2 introduced

• SIZE: 0-1 killed, 0-1 repositioned to Traditional, 1-2 introduced

• PERFORMANCE: 1-2 killed, 0-1 repositioned to Traditional, 0-1 introduced

• HIGH: 1-3 killed or repositioned to Traditional, 1-3 new products arrive in rounds 2 or 3

Page 19: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. Round 3- Forecast nature, magnitude & arena of Competition

• LOW END: 6 products=rivalry unchanged

• TRADITIONAL: 9 products, w/ 3 repositioned= increased competition

• SIZE: 7 products, w/ 2 new= increased competition

• PERFORMANCE: 4 products, w/ 1 new= reduced competition

• HIGH: 6 products, w/ 2 new= increased competition

66

99

77

44

66

Page 20: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

-Given Round 3 Scenario-How should adjust your production capacities?

Round 0-1st shift Capacity

Round 3-Unit Demand

Traditional 1800 1068

Low End 1400 2081

High End 900 668

Performance 600 823

Size 600 469

Page 21: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Optimal levels of capacity?

Page 22: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Optimal levels of automation?

Page 23: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Once have optimal levels of capacity–

Need to have most efficient levels of production costs

Page 24: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

How to have most efficient levels of production costs

Reduce Material costs• Proffer minimal/optimal level

MTBF• TQM/Sustainability Initiatives • Process Management Initiatives

Reduce Labor costs• TQM & PI Initiatives• Increase automation• Invest in employee recruitment

& training• Utilize 2nd shift

Reduce Material costs• Proffer minimal/optimal level

MTBF• TQM/Sustainability Initiatives • Process Management Initiatives

Reduce Labor costs• TQM & PI Initiatives• Increase automation• Invest in employee recruitment

& training• Utilize 2nd shift

• Increases length R&D on product line-–makes re-positioning take longer

• Incur employee separation costs

• w/ maximum expenditures can realize 18% improvement in productivity in 6 years!?

Page 25: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Why run 2nd shift –when labor costs 50% higher?

Page 26: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Why run 2nd shift –when labor costs 50% higher?

Answer by using your proformas:

1- On production spreadsheet build at capacity- if have 1000 units – build 1000 units

2-On Marketing display- FORECAST 1000 UNITS

3.-ON Proforma Income statement- note NET MARGIN –

Answer by using your proformas:

1- On production spreadsheet build at capacity- if have 1000 units – build 1000 units

2-On Marketing display- FORECAST 1000 UNITS

3.-ON Proforma Income statement- note NET MARGIN –

THE BIQ Q: If we double sales will we double our net margin?– Will we make less because labor costs are 50% higher for 2nd shift?

Page 27: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Why run 2nd shift –when labor costs 50% higher?

Answer by using your proformas:

1- On production spreadsheet double output-run full 2nd shift

2-On Marketing display- double forecast

3.-ON Proforma Income statement- NET MARGIN –will more than double

Answer by using your proformas:

1- On production spreadsheet double output-run full 2nd shift

2-On Marketing display- double forecast

3.-ON Proforma Income statement- NET MARGIN –will more than double

THE BIQ Ar: When run 1 shift- must pay all fixed costs- 2nd shift gets a free ride---only has to pay labor premium…

Page 28: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Now that that you are producing-- in the most efficient manner-- a “perfectly designed” product

• need to make sure “maximum #” consumers are aware of it & can “easily” buy it…

Page 29: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Moving Product

Message Weight & Media Planning

Breadth, Depth & Heft of Distribution Network

Optimal Pricing & Credit Terms

Message Weight & Media Planning

Breadth, Depth & Heft of Distribution Network

Optimal Pricing & Credit Terms

Page 30: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Advertising/Promo Budget Drives Awareness

Increases in Promotion Budget have diminishing returns. The first $1,500,000 buys 36% awareness; Spending another $1,500,000 (for a total of $3,000,000) buys approximately 50%. The second $1,500,000 buys only 14% more awareness. -- a $1,500,000 promotion budget would add 36% to the starting awareness, for a total awareness of 69% (33% + 36% = 69%).

Increases in Promotion Budget have diminishing returns. The first $1,500,000 buys 36% awareness; Spending another $1,500,000 (for a total of $3,000,000) buys approximately 50%. The second $1,500,000 buys only 14% more awareness. -- a $1,500,000 promotion budget would add 36% to the starting awareness, for a total awareness of 69% (33% + 36% = 69%).

When new products are invented, considered newsworthy events. Awareness is created w/ PR campaign. At launch you automatically are charged a $250 thousand fee for marketing rollout and public relations. This fee earns a new product a starting awareness of 50%

Advanced Marketing: The Marketing Budget Detail screen allows companies to allocate their Promo Budget among five different media channels. Projections of the upcoming round's awareness display in a bar chart at the bottom of the spreadsheet screen.

Page 31: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Sales Budget Drives Access• Like awareness, if your sales budgets

drop to zero, you lose one third of your accessibility each year.

• Achieving 100% accessibility is difficult. Companies must have at least two products in the segment's fine cut.

• Each product experiences diminishing returns at a sales budget of $3,000,000. However, diminishing returns for the overall segment is not reached until the budgets total $4,500,000 (for example, two products with sales budgets of $2,250,000 each).

• Once 100% accessibility is reached, you can scale back to around $3,300,000 to maintain 100%.

• Like awareness, if your sales budgets drop to zero, you lose one third of your accessibility each year.

• Achieving 100% accessibility is difficult. Companies must have at least two products in the segment's fine cut.

• Each product experiences diminishing returns at a sales budget of $3,000,000. However, diminishing returns for the overall segment is not reached until the budgets total $4,500,000 (for example, two products with sales budgets of $2,250,000 each).

• Once 100% accessibility is reached, you can scale back to around $3,300,000 to maintain 100%.

Page 32: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Fine tuning your Promo,

Sales & Pricing…

Page 33: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Promo Budget

Page 34: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Sales Budget Time Allocations

• OUTSIDE sales-meet face-to-face (cost $120K/each)

• INSIDE sales-works leads & operates website & customer support systems (cost $50K/each)

• Distributors: push product (cost $100K/each)

Decide on how many salespeople & Mfr Reps will have:

How much effort will be focused on market

segments:

Page 35: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Pricing / Credit terms

A/R Lag: (in days) is the time between customers receiving products & when they are expected to pay for ‘em

• No credit - demand falls to~ 65% of normal.• At 30 days - demand is 92%.• At 60 days - demand is 98.5% • At 120 days - demand is 100%.

The longer the lag, the more your cash is tied up in receivables.

Page 36: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.End Game Strategy

Page 37: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. If Company well managed- no need to take drastic actions

• Balance Sheet– Current ratio= 2-2.5– Leverage= 1.5-2.5– Sales/Current assets=

3-5

• Income Statement– Contribution Margin=

30%+– ROS=5%+

• Balance Sheet– Current ratio= 2-2.5– Leverage= 1.5-2.5– Sales/Current assets=

3-5

• Income Statement– Contribution Margin=

30%+– ROS=5%+

•Production #’s–Plant Utilization=150%+–Inventories= 1-90 days

•Income Statement–Customer satisfaction=40+–Awareness=80% –Accessibility=80%+

•Production #’s–Plant Utilization=150%+–Inventories= 1-90 days

•Income Statement–Customer satisfaction=40+–Awareness=80% –Accessibility=80%+

Page 38: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. End-Game Moves of a Poorly Performing Company

• X-Large dividends & Stock buy-backs

• Products killed & large sell off of capacity

• R&D, Ad & sales budgets slashed

• No plant investments

Page 39: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T. End gaming is indicative of BAD MGT-

• Can only occur if Co. has unproductive assets…

• Eliminate unproductive assets early & will have no rational for madness

Page 40: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

• Current ratio 2+ indicates no idle assets

• Plant Utililization 150%+ - no plant to liquidate

• Great products (w/ Cust. Survey Scores 40+) never Killed

• Current ratio 2+ indicates no idle assets

• Plant Utililization 150%+ - no plant to liquidate

• Great products (w/ Cust. Survey Scores 40+) never Killed

Page 41: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Rounds 6,7,8- should be most profitable

Pay off DebtInvest in growthBuy-back stockPay dividends

Pay off DebtInvest in growthBuy-back stockPay dividends

Things you can do w/ your $$$ Which most

often selected but least

preferable to do?

Page 42: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Reducing Leverage

• Says to stockholders— “We can think of nothing better to do w/ $$ than save you interest payments”– More debt eliminated the greater

target you become for a takeover..

• No reason not to maintain Co. Financial Structure that got you to position of high profitability…

Page 43: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Issue DividendsGood Dividend Policy

Net profit can only be allocated in one of two directions:

• It is either paid out to owners in dividends

• or it is Retained Earnings - to grow the company

Net profit can only be allocated in one of two directions:

• It is either paid out to owners in dividends

• or it is Retained Earnings - to grow the company

For Example:

• Ideal Investment/ round = $10-25M ( let take $20M)

• if profits=$30M & Shares = 2M… you have EPS= $15/share

• If need $20M for investment – get ½ from LT-debt- need $10M from Equity—leaves $20M in earnings…

• Could/should issue $10 Dividend

For Example:

• Ideal Investment/ round = $10-25M ( let take $20M)

• if profits=$30M & Shares = 2M… you have EPS= $15/share

• If need $20M for investment – get ½ from LT-debt- need $10M from Equity—leaves $20M in earnings…

• Could/should issue $10 Dividend

Page 44: S I M U L A T I O N M A R K E T I N G M G T. Week 4.

S I M U L A T I O N

M A R K E T I N G M G T.

Begin Practice Round 1 decision making….