S A W P A€¦ · A. PRESENTATION ON CHINO II DESALTER OPERATIONS AND SALINITY MANAGEMENT IN THE...

S A W P A

REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2014 – 9:30 A.M.

AGENDA

1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Phil Anthony, Chair)

2. ROLL CALL

3. PUBLIC COMMENTSMembers of the public may address the Commission on items within the jurisdiction of the Commission; however, no action may betaken on an item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by Government Code §54954.2(b).

4. CONSENT CALENDARAll matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Commissionby one motion as listed below. There will be no separate discussion on items prior to the time the Commission votes, unlessCommission members, staff, or the public requests one or more specific items be discussed and/or removed from the ConsentCalendar for separate action.

A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JUNE 27, 2014…………………………………..…..…5Recommendation: Approve as posted.

B. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JULY 1, 2014……………………………………..…....7 Recommendation: Approve as posted.

5. NEW BUSINESSA. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT (CM#8910)……………………………………………………………………………....11 Presenter: David Ruhl Recommendation: That the Commission authorize the General Manager to issue a Notice Inviting Bids, upon completion of the Final Plans and Specifications, for the Construction of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project.

B. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY (CM#8911)……………………………………………………………………………………………21 Presenter: Karen Williams Recommendation: The Employee Compensation Ad Hoc Committee recommends that the Commission authorize the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Classification and Compensation Study and direct staff to send it out to qualified consultants.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California 92503 (951) 354-4220

1

C. APPROVAL OF THE FINAL OWOW 2014 EMERGENCY DROUGHT GRANT SOLICITATION INTERREGIONAL LANDSCAPE WATER DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM, AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (CM#8915)………………………………………………………………………..…41 Presenter: Mark Norton Recommendation: The OWOW Steering Committee recommends approval of the final proposal, the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program, developed by the Santa Ana River Watermaster Team including the Santa Margarita Watershed for the 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation, and that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 2014-08 authorizing its submittal and execution of an agreement with the State of California.

D. OWOW 2014 EMERGENCY DROUGHT GRANT SOLICITATION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION (CM#8916)…………………………………………………………………49 Presenter: Mark Norton Recommendation: The OWOW Steering Committee recommends approval of the proposed implementation plan for the OWOW 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation Project, the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program.

E. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014-09 CALLING FOR GREATER WATER USE EFFICIENCY TO ADDRESS THE CURRENT DROUGHT (CM#8912)……………………...51 Presenter: Celeste Cantú Recommendation: It is recommended that the Commission consider and adopt Resolution No. 2014-09 and send a letter to the California State Water Resources Control Board concerning their proposed emergency regulations pertaining to the prohibition of activities and mandatory actions during the drought emergency.

6. OLD BUSINESSNone.

7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTSRecommendation: Receive and file the following oral/written reports/updates.

A. STATE LEGISLATIVE REPORT…………………………………………………………………55Presenter: Celeste Cantú

B. CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT – MAY 2014………………………………………………...65 Presenter: Karen Williams

C. INTER-FUND BORROWING – MAY 2014 (CM#8913)…………………………………………73 Presenter: Karen Williams

D. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS/FINANCIAL REPORTING –MAY 2014 (CM#8914)……..75Presenter: Karen Williams

E. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT………………………………………………………………95

F. SAWPA GENERAL MANAGERS MEETING NOTES……………………………………….....99 July 8, 2014

G. CHAIR’S COMMENTS/REPORT

H. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS

8. CLOSED SESSIONThere were no Closed Session items anticipated at the time of the posting of this agenda.

2

9

AB

PLMinSA

DI, be

_K

. ADJOU

Any person with aoard Kelly Berry

LEASE NOTEMaterials related nspection in the SAWPA website

Declaration of PoKelly Berry, Cl

een uploaded to

Augus

8/5/14 8/19/14Septem

9/2/14 9/16/14Octobe

10/7/1410/14/1

10/21/1

____________Kelly Berry, CM

URNMENT

a disability who y at 951.354.423

: to an item on thiSAWPA office aat www.sawpa.o

osting erk of the Boardthe SAWPA we

2(NOTE: A

st

Commissio4 Regular Comber

Commissi4 Regular Coer

4 Commissio4 Sixth Annu

Keeping O4 Regular Co

_____________MC

requires accomm30, at least 48 ho

is agenda submiat 11615 Sterlingorg, subject to st

d of the Santa Anebsite at www.sa

2014 - SAWPAll Commission

on Workshop (ommission Me

ion Workshop ommission Me

on Workshop ual OWOW Co

Our Cool, Riverommission Me

____________

modation in ordeours prior to the

tted to the Commg Avenue, Rivertaff’s ability to p

na Watershed Prawpa.org and pos

PA Commissn Workshops/Me

(Cancel?) eeting

eeting

onference – rside, CA eting

_____

er to participate meeting to requ

mission after disrside, during norpost documents b

roject Authority sted in SAWPA

sion Upcomineetings begin at 9

Novem

11/4/111/18/Decem

Dark??12/2 –

in this meeting uest a disability-r

stribution of the rmal business hobefore the meetin

declare that on W’s office at 1161

ng Meetings/9:30 a.m., unles

mber

4 Commissi/14 Regular Cmber

? – 12/5/14 AC

should contact Crelated modificat

agenda packet aours. Such documng.

Wednesday, Jun15 Sterling Aven

/Events ss otherwise note

ion Workshop Commission M

CWA Fall Con

Commission Cletion or accommo

are available for ments are availa

ne 9, 2014, this anue, Riverside, C

ed)

Meeting

nference

erk of the odation.

public able on the

agenda has California.

3

Page Intentionally Blank

4

SAWPA COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

JUNE 27, 2014 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Phil Anthony, Chair, Orange County Water District Tom Evans, Western Municipal Water District Ron Sullivan, Eastern Municipal Water District Jasmin A. Hall, Alternate, Inland Empire Utilities Agency STAFF PRESENT Celeste Cantú; Rich Haller; Larry McKenney; Kelly Berry OTHERS PRESENT John Rossi, Western Municipal Water District; Cindy Miller, Chino Basin

Desalter Authority; Todd Minten, Jurupa Community Services District; Moustafa Aly, Jurupa Community Services District

The Special Commission Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority was called to order at 11:22 a.m. by Chair Phil Anthony at the Jurupa Community Services District, 11201 Harrel Street, Jurupa Valley, California.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Commissioner Anthony noted the presence of several OCSD Board members, and expressed appreciation for their attendance today and for their interest in what occurs upstream from Orange County in the Santa Ana River Watershed.

2. ROLL CALL

Roll call was duly noted and recorded by the Clerk of the Board.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chair Anthony called for public comments. There were no public comments.

4. INFORMATIONAL REPORT

Recommendation: Receive for information.

A. PRESENTATION ON CHINO II DESALTER OPERATIONS AND SALINITY MANAGEMENT IN THE CHINO BASIN Presenters: John Rossi, General Manager, Western Municipal Water District Celeste Cantú, General Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Cindy Miller, Chino Basin Desalter Authority

5. WALKING TOUR – CHINO II DESALTER AND PHASE II EXPANSION PROJECT

Todd Minten, Water Operations and Facilities Manager, Jurupa Community Services District Moustafa Aly, Chief Plan Operator, Jurupa Community Services District

5

SAWPA Commission Regular Meeting Minutes

June 27, 2014 Page 2

6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 12:45 p.m.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Commission on Tuesday, July 15, 2014. ______________________________________ Phil Anthony, Chair

6

�

SAWPA COMMISSION WORKSHOP/REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

JULY 1, 2014

COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Phil Anthony, Chair, Orange County Water District Don Galleano, Western Municipal Water District Ron Sullivan, Eastern Municipal Water District Mark Bulot, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Terry Catlin, Inland Empire Utilities Agency Ed Killgore, Alternate, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Jasmin A. Hall, Alternate, Inland Empire Utilities Agency STAFF PRESENT Celeste Cantú; Rich Haller; Larry McKenney; Mark Norton; Karen Williams;

David Ruhl; Carlos Quintero; Ian Achimore; Dean Unger; Kelly Berry OTHERS PRESENT Tom Moody, City of Corona; Katie Morris, City of Corona; Louis Abi-Younes,

City of Ontario; Omar Dandashi, NMC Builders, LLC

The Regular Commission Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Chair Phil Anthony at the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, 11615 Sterling Ave., Riverside, California.

1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Commissioner Bulot led the Pledge of Allegiance.

2. ROLL CALL

Roll call was duly noted and recorded by the Clerk of the Board.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chair Anthony called for public comments. There were no public comments.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR

A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JUNE 17, 2014

MOVED, approval of the Consent Calendar.

Result: Adopted (Unanimously; 5-0) Motion/Second: Galleano/Sullivan Ayes Bulot, Sullivan, Galleano, Catlin, Anthony Nays: None Abstentions: None Absent: None

7


July 1, 2014 Page 2

5. WORKSHOP DISCUSSION AGENDA

A. CITY OF CORONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER – A BRINE LINE SUCCESS STORY Tom Moody, Operations Manager with the City of Corona Department of Water & Power provided a PowerPoint presentation on TDS/Salinity Management and the importance of the Inland Empire Brine Line in salinity management within the City. The City of Corona, covering over 45 square miles, serves over 150,000 residents with a diversified water supply utilizing groundwater (treated at the Temescal Desalter and blended), Colorado River water, and State Water Project treated water. Corona utilizes 21 groundwater wells, but in an area with a rich history of agriculture and flood irrigation, there is a high salinity concentration from 360 mg/L to 1,100 mg/L. Blending alone will not reduce this high level of TDS. While Corona currently utilizes three water reclamation facilities, they were unable to treat influent TDS reaching over 850 mg/L in 2000. The Temescal Desalter, currently operating 27/7, was built in 2001. It produces 10.3 MGD of permeate water, with an average 1.54 MGD discharged into the Inland Empire Brine Line. The final product water is pumped off-site for blending and distribution into the system. As a result, water reclamation facility influent TDS was reduced from 850 mg/L to 720 mg/L in compliance with NPDES effluent TDS. 5,000 to 6,000 lbs. of salt have been offset by the Temescal Desalter, which relies heavily on the Inland Empire Brine Line.

Mr. Moody emphasized the high value of the Inland Empire Brine Line, noting the City of Corona is researching leasing future capacity from Dairy Farmers of America and purchasing unused Brine Line capacity from other dischargers.

Commissioner Anthony thanked Mr. Moody for his inspiring, positive presentation.

B. MILL CREEK WETLANDS Louis Abi-Younes, City Engineer, City of Ontario, noted that in 2004, the City of Ontario annexed 3,000 acres, within which there would be upwards of ten possible developments with 150 to 200 residential tracts. Given this scale of anticipated development, the impact on water quality from a global perspective was examined, and an integrated concept with a regional approach utilizing integrated partnerships was developed with a vision of establishing the future of the watershed through land planning. Acreage was set aside for the purpose of creating an integrated regional facility utilizing a private/public partnership, now known as the Mill Creek Wetlands.

Omar Dandashi, NMC Builders, LLC, described the Mill Creek Wetlands as 50 acres of wetlands with 150 AF of water quality treatment, over 23 acres of riparian and wetland habitat and three miles of recreational trails. Significant regional benefits include an average of 2,100 AF wet weather treatment and 3,100 AF dry weather treatment. It is an open water UV treatment facility in which plants and active microorganisms clean stormwater flowing into these constructed treatment wetlands utilizing gravitational flow via two parallel basin chains. Another important benefit is the creation of island habitat for local birds, such as the red-winged blackbird, blue and white herons, and egrets. Native California vegetation has been utilized. Mr. Dandashi noted the Mill Creek Wetlands is the only treatment facility of this type in the Santa Ana River Watershed, but he believes this project represents the future in regional stormwater treatment.

Commissioner Sullivan praised the project as an example of local entities coming together in private/public partnerships without the need for additional federal regulations.

Commissioner Anthony inquired as to public access within the wetland ecosystem. Mr. Dandashi advised the Mill Creek Wetlands will be maintained as a regional park by the San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department, with posted hours of operation and rules of access and use.

8


July 1, 2014 Page 3

6. NEW BUSINESS None.

7. OLD BUSINESS

A. INTER-FUND BORROWING PROGRAM Commissioner Sullivan had requested this information at an earlier Commission meeting. He thanked staff for providing it to him earlier, and indicated he would follow up with staff relative to his earlier questions.

8. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS

Recommendation: Receive and file the following oral/written reports/updates.

A. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE – FISCAL YEAR 2014 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS; FISCAL YEAR 2015 GOALS (CM#8902) Rich Haller provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining Inland Empire Brine Line accomplishments during Fiscal Year 2014, and setting forth goals for the upcoming fiscal year.

B. PLANNING DEPARTMENT – FISCAL YEAR 2014 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES

AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS; FISCAL YEAR 2015 GOALS (CM#8908) Celeste Cantú provided a summary of activities during Fiscal Year 2014, noting Mark Norton was presenting the OWOW Plan at the American Water Works Association (AWWA) conference and was unable to attend today’s meeting.

C. OWOW UPDATE (CM#8909)

Ian Achimore provided an update on the Round 2 grant agreement, noting Bob Ohlund from Dudek will provide additional information on Round 3 during a presentation to the Commission in July.

D. CASH TRANSACTION REPORT – MAY 2014

E. CHAIR’S COMMENTS/REPORT

Celeste Cantú provided a report on the settlement of the Castle & Cooke litigation, Superior Court Case No. RIC 495874. Castle & Cooke won a favorable decision on its appeal of SAWPA’s victory at trial in the eminent domain lawsuit related to Reach V of the Inland Empire Brine Line, the case being remanded to Superior Court for retrial on the issue of severance damages. On March 4, 2014, the Commission took action in closed session, by a 5-0 unanimous vote, approving the terms of a settlement agreement with Castle & Cooke and directing the General Manager to execute the settlement agreement once the documents were finalized and Castle & Cooke agreed. The essential terms of the agreement include SAWPA agreeing to pay Castle & Cooke $75,000 and SAWPA abandoning the easement in dispute in the original trial and relocating to a new alignment in Nichols Road, with Castle & Cooke providing a new easement in order to access the right-of-way in Nichols Road. A stipulation and proposed judgment affecting the agreement, including details regarding the timeline for the abandonment and realignment work, were drafted. The Court has approved the judgment, settling the dispute and disposing of the eminent domain lawsuit. In accordance with provisions of the Brown Act, the Commission’s prior approval of the settlement is being reported today, now that the settlement is final.

9


July 1, 2014 Page 4

Commissioner Anthony expressed concern regarding our persistent drought conditions. The drought has been impacting Southern California for the past three years, and the question of what more we ought to do is becoming increasingly more serious as these severe drought conditions continue. While Southern California has led the way in water planning and storage projects, water storage capacity is now in its third year of utilizing a four-year supply, which is extremely serious should that final year of storage capacity run dry before significant rainfall. As recent reports are indicating that El Niño appears to be dissipating, Commissioner Anthony suggested SAWPA put together thoughts on crafting an approach addressing how we deal with the drought in the form of a position paper or policy for the Commission’s consideration. The Commission unanimously agreed with Commissioner Anthony’s suggestion, asking Celeste Cantú, staff, and Member Agencies put their heads together and bring something forward within the next meeting or two.

F. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS

Commissioner Ron Sullivan commented on the successful Chino II Desalter tour and luncheon at Galleano Winery. In this one afternoon both OCSD and SAWPA, as partners, were able to see what the other does and sit down and share that by working together, we can more effectively and efficiently take care of our communities. Commissioner Sullivan noted he is anxious to participate in tours of this type at OCSD facilities.

Copies of letters of appreciation from Troy Edgar, outgoing OCSD Board Chairman, to Commissioners Don Galleano and Ron Sullivan were provided. In his letter, Mr. Edgar thanked them for their generous hospitality, and expressed gladness in their ability to forge a positive working relationship between the two agencies.

9. CLOSED SESSION

There was no closed session.

10. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business for review, Chair Anthony adjourned the meeting at 10:27 a.m.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Commission on Tuesday, July 15, 2014. ______________________________________ Phil Anthony, Chair

10

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8910 DATE: July15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Inland Empire Brine Line Reach VRehabilitation and Improvement Project PREPARED BY: David Ruhl, Program Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission authorize the General Manager to issue a Notice Inviting Bids, upon completion of the Final Plans and Specifications, for the Construction of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project. DISCUSSION In September 2013, the Commission authorized Dudek Engineering to implement the design of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (“Project”). Their work includes preparation of preliminary design, final design, and preparation of plans and specifications for construction of the Project. The work is a result of the Pipeline Condition Study completed in May 2013 by RMC Water and Environmental to evaluate eight miles of the Reach V Brine Line, where extensive investigation has revealed poor compaction and over-deflection of the pipe, which led to the pipe failure and brine spill on October 18, 2011. The Preliminary Design Report (PDR) was completed in January 2014 and presented to the Commission in February 2014. Dudek submitted their 95% design level construction plans and specifications in July 2014. A summary description of the project is shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1 – Summary of 95% Design Project Recommendations

Item # Project Description

1 Maintenance Access Structures

Install 8 MAS with isolation valves and access tees for flow by-passing. Install 11 MAS with access tees.

2 In – pipe Inspection CCTV inspection and laser profiling of 27,000 ft of pipe to verify ovality.

3 Pressure CIPP Lining Rehabilitation Project

Pressure CIPP Line and Gravity CIPP line 23,000 ft of high and medium risk locations of 24-inch PVC Pipe.

4 4” Air/Vacuum Release Valves and Blow-off Valves and access

Replace or modify 20 air release valves and replace 18 blow-off valves and modify access.

In June 2014, the Commission authorized Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. (Vali Cooper) to commence Phase 1 of the Construction Management Services for the Project. Phase 1 consists of a bidability review of the 95% plans and specifications prior to advertising for bids. The remaining Construction Management and Inspection Services (Phase 2) will be presented to the Commission in October 2014, along with award of a construction contract. Upon completion of the review of the 95% plans and specifications by Vali Cooper and SAWPA staff, Dudek will incorporate the comments and prepare the final plans and specifications. Thereafter, the Notice Inviting Bids will be issued on August 28, 2014.

11

CM#8910 July 15, 2014 Page 2

SRF Loan Program Funding for the Project is through the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program. The Funding Agreement was signed by the State Water Resources Control Board in June 2014. The SRF loan amount is $19 million and includes design and construction costs for the Rehabilitation and Improvement (Reach V CIPP and Nichols Road relocation) Project. The term of the loan is 30 years at a 1.9% interest rate. CEQA In January 2014, the Commission directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption for the Project. The project is located along existing City and County streets, and no significant environmental impacts are anticipated. Additionally, all work will take place using a trenchless technology (CIPP) with the need for a limited number of access pits, all to be constructed along the same Brine Line alignment on previously impacted areas. Construction Cost Estimate The revised construction cost estimate based on the 95% design submittal is $11.8 million. This construction cost estimate is about $400,000 less than the 65% design level estimate. The reduction is due to modifications realized during the 65% design review, as well as eliminating about 10,000 feet of pipe from the Project. Additional field investigation during the design has verified that this section of the Project has different pipe material (HDPE) and better conditions than found on the other section of the system where the pipe material is PVC. Additional field investigation will be included in the construction contract to confirm these findings. A revised construction cost estimate will be included with the final plans and specifications submittal in August 2014. Schedule

Schedule of Critical Activities CEQA Notice of Exemption Complete SRF Program Funding Complete 95% Design Submittal Complete Commission Approval – Notice Inviting Bids July 15, 2014 Final Plans and Specifications August 20, 2014 Issue Notice Inviting Bids August 28, 2014 Commission Approval – Award Construction Contract

October 21, 2014

Construction October 2014 – March 2016 RESOURCE IMPACTS Funds to cover the design are budgeted under the FY 2014-15 Budget, Fund No. 326. Construction and Construction Management costs would be funded through the SRF Loan Program. The SRF loan amount is $19 Million and includes design and construction costs for the Project (Reach V CIPP and Nichols Road Relocation). DR:kb

Attachments: 1. Plans, 95% submittal – Cover 2. Specifications, 95% progress set – Cover, Table of Contents, Invitation to Bid

CM 8910 Reach V Rehab Bid Notice 7-15-14

12

7616.0004INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE

REACH V REHABILITATION & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164

75

INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE

REACH V REHABILITATION & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

JULY 2014

APPROVED BY:

RICHARD E. HALLER, P.E.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

EXECUTIVE MANAGER OF OPERATIONS

DATE

VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP

G-1

1

SHEET DRAWING

DRAWING INDEX

DESCRIPTION

1 G-1 TITLE SHEET2 G-2 GENERAL NOTES3 G-3 ABBREVATIONS, LEGEND, AND DATA TABLES

4 C-1 STA 622+35.00 TO STA 580+00.005 C-2 STA 580+00.00 TO STA 548+00.006 C-3 STA 548+00.00 TO STA 514+00.007 C-4 STA 514+00.00 TO STA 471+50.008 C-5 STA 471+50.00 TO STA 437+50.009 C-6 STA 437+50.00 TO STA 400+00.0010 C-7 STA 400+00.00 TO STA 362+00.0011 C-8 STA 222+00.00 TO STA 182+00.0012 C-9 STA 182+00.00 TO STA 141+00.0013 C-10 STA 141+00.00 TO STA 108+50.00

14 C-11 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0580-B, PIT @ STA 614+00.00, MAS V-0570-A15 C-12 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ 597+50.00, MAS V-0560-B, PIT @ 582+50.0016 C-13 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0550-A, PIT @ STA 567+50.00, MAS V-0540-A17 C-14 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ 553+50.00, MAS V-0530-B, PIT @ 539+00.0018 C-15 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0520-A, PIT @ STA 524+00.00, MAS V-0510-A19 C-16 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ 509+00.00, MAS V-0500-B, PIT @ 494+00.0020 C-17 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0490-A, PIT @ STA 479+50.00, MAS V-0480-A21 C-18 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ 464+50.00, MAS V-0470-B, PIT @ 449+50.0022 C-19 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0460-A, PIT @ STA 434+50.00, MAS V-0450-A23 C-20 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ STA 419+50.00, MAS V-0440-B, MAS V-0430-B24 C-21 DETAIL AREAS - PIT @ 393+50.00, MAS V-0420-A, PIT @ 378+50.0025 C-22 DETAIL AREAS - MAS V-0410-A, PIT @ STA 370+00.00, MAS V-0400-B

26 D-1 DETAILS - 127 D-2 DETAILS - 228 D-3 DETAILS - 3

TRAFFIC CONTROL29-75 --- TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS

13


14


INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 1

JULY 2014 95% SUBMITTAL

SP

EC

IFIC

AT

ION

S

15

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvement Project – Phase 1 2

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF

INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 1

PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:

D. MICHAEL METTS C 42586

(SIGNATURE)

(DATE)

Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not

necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or

recommendation for use. (Gov. Code § 7550, 40 CFR § 31.20.)

16


TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:

INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Specification Name Section Number

Division 00 – Contract Invitation to Bid ............................................................................................................. 5

Instructions to Bidders ........................................................................................ 7 Bid ................................................................................................................................ 15

Bid Bond ........................................................................................................... 27 Non-collusion Affidavit .................................................................................... 29 Insurance Requirements Acknowledgement .................................................... 30 Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements and Certification of

Ability to Provide Coverage Specified ................................................. 32 American Iron and Steel (AIS) Clause ............................................................. 33 Contractor References and Qualifications ........................................................ 34

Agreement .................................................................................................................... 37Performance Bond ............................................................................................ 42 Payment Bond ................................................................................................... 43 Certificate of Insurance ..................................................................................... 44

General Conditions ............................................................................................. 00700-1 California State Requirements ...................................................................... 00800CA-1 Special Conditions.............................................................................................. 00900-1

Division 01 – General Requirements General Requirements ............................................................................................ 01000 Summary of Work .................................................................................................. 01010 Measurement and Payment .................................................................................... 01025 Submittals ............................................................................................................... 01300Schedule of Values ................................................................................................. 01301 Progress Schedule .................................................................................................. 01311 Quality Control ....................................................................................................... 01400 Construction Facilities and Temporary Controls ................................................... 01500 Mobilization ........................................................................................................... 01505 Temporary Environmental Controls ...................................................................... 01560 Traffic Regulation .................................................................................................. 01570 Protection of Materials and Equipment .................................................................. 01620 Project Closeout ..................................................................................................... 01700

17


Final Cleanup ......................................................................................................... 01710 Record Drawings .................................................................................................... 01720 Permits .................................................................................................................... 01900

Division 02 – Civil Geotechnical Investigation ..................................................................................... 02010 Trenching, Backfill, and Compaction .................................................................... 02223 Utility Crossings ..................................................................................................... 02225 Sheeting, Shoring, Bracing and Safety .................................................................. 02350 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement ................................................................................ 02510 Pavement Striping and Marking ............................................................................. 02600 Temporary Handling of Brine Flow ....................................................................... 02999

Division 03 - Concrete Precast Concrete Maintenance Holes ..................................................................... 03460 Precast Utility Vaults ............................................................................................. 03485

Division 09 – Finishes Painting and Coating Systems ................................................................................ 09900 Petrolatum Wax Tape Coating ............................................................................... 09902

Division 13 – Special Construction Auger Boring (Steel Casing) .................................................................................. 13320

Division 15 – Mechanical Pipe Cleaning and Inspection ................................................................................. 15045 General Piping Stipulations .................................................................................... 15051 HDPE Pipe, Fittings and Appurtenances ............................................................... 15061 Ductile Iron Pipe and Fittings ................................................................................ 15062 Valves and Appurtenances ..................................................................................... 15100 Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) ................................................................................... 15121 Mechanical Pipe Couplings .................................................................................... 15165

AppendicesAppendix A – Drawings Appendix B – Draft Permit Applications Appendix C – Geotechnical Documents Appendix D – Project Sign Requirements Appendix E – EPA Forms 6100-2, 6100-3, and 6100-4 Appendix F – CWSRF Construction Contract Requirements (CCR) and

Boilerplate (BP)

18


INVITATION TO BID

Sealed Bids for construction of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project, addressed to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (Owner), will be received at the office of the General Manager, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503, until 10:00 a.m. local time, on the _____ day of October 2014, and will be publicly opened and read aloud. Any Bids received after this specified time and date will not be opened or considered.

The Work includes the inspection of approximately 27,000 linear feet of existing 24-inch diameter PVC pipe, installation of approximately 23,000 linear feet of cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) rehabilitation, construction of nineteen (19) maintenance access structures, replacement of fittings and appurtenances, and temporary bypassing of brine flows.

The Work is located within Temescal Canyon Road between La Gloria Street and Glen Ivy Road, with additional work in Temescal Canyon Road between Indian Truck Trail and approximately 600 feet south of Earthmover Circle. All facilities are located within County of Riverside and/or City of Corona rights-of-way.

The Work shall be fully completed in all respects within _____ successive calendar days from the effective date identified in the Notice to Award.

Bidding Documents may be examined, by appointment, in the Owner's office, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503. For information concerning the proposed Work, contact David Ruhl at (951) 354-4223.

Bidding Documents may be purchased from the Owner's office for $25. Prospective bidder shall visit SAWPA office, and must call Zyanya Blancas at (951) 354-4220 or email her at [email protected].

A MANDATORY pre-bid conference will be held on September ___, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. at the SAWPA office, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503.

A complete Bid submittal consists of completed and executed forms contained in the Bid Forms section of the Bidding Documents. Return of the entire Bidding Document for the Bid Opening is neither required nor encouraged. The Bid Bond, included in the Bid Forms, must be completed, attached to the Bid and payable to the Owner in an amount not less than 10 percent of the total amount of the Bid.

The Successful Bidder will be required to furnish the necessary additional Bonds and Certificates for the faithful performance of the Work, as prescribed in the Contract Documents.

Each Bidder must be licensed in the State of California and qualified to perform the Work described in the Approved Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 3300, the Contractor must possess a General Engineering Contractor's license (Class "A") at the time that Bid Proposals are opened. Failure to possess such a License shall render any bid submitted as non-responsive. Before a contract will be awarded for the Work

19


contemplated herein, the Owner will conduct such investigation as is necessary to determine the performance record and ability of the apparent low Bidder to perform the size and type of work specified under this contract. Upon request and as required in these Contract Documents, the Bidder shall submit such information as deemed necessary by the Owner to determine that the Bidder is responsive and responsible.

California prevailing wages shall be paid to all construction workers on this project. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations has established the prevailing rate of per diem wages for workers to be used on the job. This information is available on the internet at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm, and various regulations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/t8/ch8sb3.html . The Contractor shall comply with California Labor Code and shall post a copy of the prevailing wages at the jobsite.

In accordance with California Public Code Section 3400, the Contractor shall have ten (10) days after Notice of Award is issued for submission of data substantiating a request for substitution of an “or equal” product.

The Contractor shall comply (and have a history of compliance) with the Executive Order 11246 entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity" as amended, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Part 60).

Payment for the Work accomplished will be made upon completion and acceptance of the Work by the Owner.

Owner reserves the right to reject all Bids or any Bid not conforming to the intent and purpose of the Bidding Documents. Owner reserves the right to postpone award of the contract(s) for a period of time without affecting the price bid; however, the Notice of Award shall not be delayed beyond 90 days from the Bid opening date.

PROJECT FUNDING. This project is funded through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Program. The Contractor shall be responsible for meeting all requirements of that funding source. Contractor shall refer to Appendix F, CWSRF Program Construction Contract Requirements (CCR) and Boilerplate (BP).

The Contractor is also directed to Article 4 of the Special Conditions for additional requirements related to the CWSRF program, which the Contractor shall comply with fully throughout the project.

20

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8911 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission THROUGH: Employee Compensation Ad Hoc Committee (July 3, 2014) SUBJECT: Request for Proposals for Classification and Compensation Study PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION The Employee Compensation Ad Hoc Committee recommends that the Commission authorize the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Classification and Compensation Study and direct staff to send it out to qualified consultants. DISCUSSION The Ad Hoc Committee met in January to discuss whether SAWPA employees should begin paying the member contribution to PERS, and the appropriate COLA and merit pool for FYE 2014. The Commission also discussed the desirability of SAWPA moving to a more structured compensation program, including a step system, rather than relying exclusively on a merit pool. At this meeting, it also was discussed that staff should develop a scope for the development of a compensation structure that could include salaries with position ranges and steps, a more focused use of merit awards, and guidelines for other aspects of compensation and benefits, including the development of a method to mitigate SAWPA’s retirement contribution obligation. Staff developed a scope of work and RFP for a Classification and Compensation Study, which was presented at the July 3, 2014 Ad Hoc Committee meeting. After presentation and discussion of the RFP, the Ad Hoc Committee decided to move the RFP forward for authorization by the Commission at the July 15, 2014 meeting. RESOURCE IMPACTS The anticipated cost of the study is included in the FY 2014-15 Budget. It is anticipated that the study cost could range from $50,000 to $80,000. Attachment: 1. Request for Proposals to Conduct a Classification and Compensation Study CM 8911 Class and Comp RFP 7-15-14

21


22

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

TO CONDUCT A

CLASSIFICATION and COMPENSATION STUDY

July 2014

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This solicitation package includes the sections and subsections listed below. If any of these items are missing from your solicitation package, please contact the person identified in Section 1(E). SECTION 1 - SUBMITTAL INFORMATION A. INTRODUCTION 1-1 B. BACKGROUND 1-1 C. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 1-1 D. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE 1-2 E. SUBMITTAL INQUIRIES 1-2 F. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL 1-2 G. PROPOSAL FORMAT; BINDING AUTHORITY 1-2 H. ACCEPT OR REJECT PROPOSALS 1-2 SECTION 2 - GENERAL INFORMATION A. WAITING PERIOD 2-1 B. PROPOSAL PREPARATION COSTS 2-1 C. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL BEFORE DEADLINE 2-1 D. MISTAKE IN PROPOSAL 2-1 E. INTERPRETATION OF DOCUMENTS 2-1 F. PROPOSAL FEE SCHEDULE 2-1 G. REFERENCES 2-2 H. AWARD/SELECTION CRITERIA 2-2 I. CONTRACT AWARD 2-2 J. PUBLIC RECORD 2-2 K. ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT 2-2 L. INSURANCE 2-3 SECTION 3 - FORMS PROPOSAL SCHEDULE "A" 3-1 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE “A” SIGNATURE FORM 3-2 CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION 3-3 REFERENCES AND SUBCONTRACTORS 3-4 WORKERS' COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE 3-5 NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT 3-6 EXCEPTION FORM 3-7 SECTION 4 -SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CLASSIFICATION STUDY 4-1 B. COMPENSATION STUDY 4-2 C. DEVELOP METHOD TO MITIGATE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION OBLIGATION 4-3 D. SUGGESTED PROPOSAL SCHEDULE 4-3 E. PROPOSAL FORMAT 4-3

24

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Classification and Compensation Study Section 1-1

SECTION 1 - SUBMITTAL INFORMATION A. INTRODUCTION: The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("Agency" and/or “SAWPA”) has

issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) to conduct a Classification and Compensation Study (Study) and is accepting sealed proposals (Proposals) at the Agency’s Headquarters, located at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California, 92503.

B. BACKGROUND: The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) was formed in 1972 to

plan and build facilities to protect water quality in the Santa Ana River Watershed. SAWPA is a joint powers authority comprised of the following five major water districts that share the Santa Ana River Watershed: Eastern Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utilities Agency (formerly Chino Basin Municipal Water District), Orange County Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, and Western Municipal Water District (“Member Agencies”). The governance structure of SAWPA is made up of an elected Board of Directors and an alternate Board of Directors (also elected) from each of the five water districts forming what is known as the Board of Commissioners.

The Santa Ana River is the largest stream system in southern California. The river begins high in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows over 100 miles southwesterly where it discharges to the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. The Santa Ana River Watershed, which receives an average annual rainfall of about 13 inches, covers over 2,650 square miles of widely varying urban, rural and forested terrain. The Watershed covers the more populated urban areas of San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange Counties, and a small portion of Los Angeles County and provides a home to over 6 million people.

As of July 1, 2014, the Agency had 24 full-time authorized positions, all of which are filled, and 4 interns. The Agency does not have any employees represented by unions. The Agency has never experienced a work stoppage or strike.

The Agency is comprised of the following departments: Agency Administration, Finance, Engineering and Operations, Water Resources and Planning, and Information Systems and Technology. An organization chart showing the various departments in each of the divisions is provided as Exhibit A.

C. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: SAWPA is a multi-benefit agency utilizing a multi-faceted

organizational structure within which employees organize, implement, support and manage varied activities and responsibilities of significant scope and breadth. SAWPA employees are continually challenged to independently utilize their knowledge, skills and experience in effectively and resourcefully supporting the mission critical components of the Agency. The purpose of the Study is to define the unique characteristics required of SAWPA employees and quantify its value to the Agency. The Study will also create ranges and steps for current SAWPA positions. The intent is to create a more structured approach to total compensation that provides for regular professional development, puts payment for exceptional performance in a proper context, and standardizes decisions regarding COLAs and other benefits. The Study would not be limited to classification and compensation of Member Agencies. Market comparisons with Member Agencies and other similar agencies must be made with care as SAWPA positions are tasked with a different range of job responsibilities due to the diversity of SAWPA. Additionally, the Study would be used to ensure that wages and benefits (total compensation) earned by SAWPA employees are equitable and competitive with benchmarked agencies.

25


A method to mitigate SAWPA’s retirement contribution obligation in the future for pre-2013 employees also needs to be analyzed. Currently, SAWPA pays the 7% employee contribution for classic employees. The current practice of SAWPA paying the nominal employee share will be evaluated as part of the Study to mitigate the Agency’s exposure to the risk of retirement cost increases going forward. The intent is that the Study will identify an appropriate approach for SAWPA employees to begin funding the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC), with the ultimate goal being that employees fund 100% of the EPMC. Considering SAWPA’s current payroll, retirement benefit formula, and demographics, and in order to provide protection to the Agency and fairness to the employees, several approaches should be evaluated, including the cap approach implemented by Member Agency San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, and a phased-in, multi-year approach implemented by Member Agency Inland Empire Utilities Agency. Any approach should take into consideration the financial impact to SAWPA employees.

D. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Proposals in response to this RFP are due at the Agency’s

headquarters located at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California, 92503, no later than 5:00 PM local time on Monday, August 18, 2014 (“Submittal Deadline”). The date and time of receipt of all Proposals will be logged. Proposals will not be accepted after the Submittal Deadline. Consultant shall submit an original and five (5) copies of the Proposal in a sealed envelope addressed to the attention of Ms. Karen Williams. In bold lettering, mark the envelope with the following words: “CLASSIFICATION and COMPENSATION STUDY”.

E. SUBMITTAL INQUIRIES: Organizations and/or individuals interested in submitting Proposals

shall not make personal contact with any member of the SAWPA Commission or SAWPA staff members other than Karen Williams. Questions regarding this RFP shall be submitted no later than 5:00 PM on Thursday, August 14, 2014. All questions regarding this RFP must be directed via e-mail to Karen Williams at [email protected]. The words “(RFP) Classification & Compensation Study” must be referenced in the e-mail subject line.

F. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL: Any Proposal submitted via facsimile and/or e-mail shall be

considered non-responsive and shall be rejected without further notice or communication. Any Proposal found to be illegible or incomplete shall be considered for rejection. Consultants assume full responsibility for submitting their Proposal at the designated address on or before the Submittal Deadline. More than one (1) original proposal from an individual, firm, partnership, or corporation under the same or different names will not be considered.

G. PROPOSAL FORMAT; BINDING AUTHORITY: Proposals not following the requested format

may be deemed non-responsive and eliminated from further consideration. Proposals shall include page numbers, a dated cover letter which must be signed by a person authorized to negotiate and execute contracts on behalf of the Consultant, and must be binding for a period of ninety (90) days.

H. ACCEPT OR REJECT PROPOSALS: The Agency reserves the right to accept or reject any or all

Proposals and/or re-solicit or cancel this RFP if deemed to be in the best interest of the Agency. The Agency reserves the right to waive any informality in this RFP and in the Proposals as submitted to the Agency. The Agency will not conduct debriefings with firms/individuals not selected. Any individual and/or firm shall be responsible for any and all expenses incurred in preparing said Proposals. Please reference Section 2. Paragraph B. for additional information.

26

mailto:[email protected]


SECTION 2 - GENERAL INFORMATION

NOTE: IT IS THE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO EXAMINE THE "REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS" SOLICITATION IN ITS ENTIRETY

PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL.

A. WAITING PERIOD: All Consultants are alerted that a waiting period of up to ninety (90) days from the Submittal Deadline may be required before proceedings are completed and an award is made. Consultants shall assume full responsibility for the effect of the waiting period on all proposal fees and terms.

B. PROPOSAL PREPARATION COSTS: The Agency is not and shall not be deemed liable for any

costs incurred by Consultant in the preparation, submittal, or presentation of their Proposal. Be advised that Consultant may be asked to make a minimum of two presentations in support of their submitted Proposal prior to award of any contract.

C. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL BEFORE SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Any Consultant may

request the withdrawal of their submitted Proposal, either in person or by written request, at any time before the Submittal Deadline. Upon receiving the written request to withdraw a submitted Proposal, the Agency will consider the Consultant's submitted Proposal null and void and return it to the Consultant at the expense of Consultant. Withdrawal of Consultant's submitted Proposal before the Submittal Deadline will not prejudice Consultant's resubmittal for this or any future proposal(s).

D. MISTAKE IN PROPOSAL: Any Consultant may withdraw their submitted Proposal after the

Submittal Deadline, subject to the time restrictions indicated below, ONLY if the Consultant can establish, to the Agency’s satisfaction, that a mistake was made in preparing the submitted Proposal.

1. A Consultant declaring a mistake must provide a written notice to the Agency within five (5)

calendar days following the Submittal Deadline, specifying in detail how the mistake occurred, and how the mistake made the submitted Proposal materially different than it was intended.

2. Withdrawal of the submitted Proposal will only be permitted for mistakes made in the completion of the Proposal. NOTE: A Consultant who claims a mistake shall be PROHIBITED from submitting further Proposals on a Project in which the mistake in the proposal was claimed. (California Public Contract Code §5105.)

E. INTERPRETATION OF DOCUMENTS: During the proposal solicitation period, should a

Consultant find discrepancies or omissions in the specifications of the "Request for Proposals" or should the Consultant be in doubt as to their interpretation, the Consultant shall immediately contact the person indicated in Section 1. Paragraph E. above. Should it be found necessary, a written addendum will be sent to all known Consultants. Any addenda issued prior to the Submittal Deadline shall form a part of this solicitation and shall become a part of the submitted Proposal.

F. PROPOSAL FEE SCHEDULE:

1. As a part of the submitted Proposal, Consultant’s price and fee schedule shall be titled Proposal Schedule "A" and shall be submitted in a separate sealed fee envelope to encompass all requirements set forth in Section 4 - Scope of Services. Consultant shall

27


include in table format with the milestones and associated fee, along with the respective classifications of staff that will perform the work and associated work effort in hours and billing rate. The total not-to-exceed fee shall be calculated and highlighted for the entire work effort. All anticipated meetings shall be included in the total work effort.

2. Be advised that, at any time, the Agency may require the Consultant to further itemize and/or detail components of any or all proposal price(s), invoices, etc.; e.g., labor, expenses, materials, etc.

G. REFERENCES: As a part of the submitted Proposal, the Consultant shall provide a Reference

List with at least five (5) public agencies for whom they have provided similar services within the last three (3) years. The Reference List must include the name and address of each public agency, contact person(s), telephone number(s), email address(es), date of service and brief description of the services provided.

H. AWARD/SELECTION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be used in the rating process for the

selection of a Consultant’s submitted Proposal to provide all required work tasks:

1. Approach to performance of the study (methodology); 2. Demonstrated professional skills, experience and credentials of staff to be assigned to this

project; 3. Quality of submitted Proposal; 4. References; 5. Demonstrated success working with multi-benefit agencies utilizing a multi-faceted

organizational structure within which employees conduct activities of significant scope and breadth.

6. Demonstrated understanding and success of working with employees through this type of classification process;

7. Demonstrated ability to communicate with a variety of employees in different job classifications who have never been involved in a Classification and Compensation Study;

8. Ability to perform the work within the stated timeframe (work schedule); and 9. Fee Schedule.

I. CONTRACT AWARD: Upon award selection, final Contract(s) will be negotiated. The Agency

reserves the right to award one contract, multiple contracts or no contract, whichever is in the best interest of the Agency.

J. PUBLIC RECORD: Upon award, information regarding the successful Consultant will be posted

for a period of fourteen (14) days at the Agency Headquarters, located at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California, on the Agency’s Network, and/or on the Agency’s website. NOTE: All information contained in submitted Proposals is subject to California Government Code §6250 et seq., commonly known as the Public Records Act. Information contained in submitted Proposals shall become public record after the review process has been completed in recommendation for award of contract to the SAWPA Commission and shall be made available upon request.

K. ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT: After award of contract(s), all correspondence and invoices

generated by Consultant shall include reference to the Contract Number, and must be accompanied by detailed supporting documentation. The Agency shall pay the Consultant’s properly submitted and executed invoices, subject to approval by the General Manager, within thirty (30) days following receipt of the invoice.

28


L. INSURANCE: Upon award, Consultant shall be required to maintain the required insurance, naming SAWPA as an additional insured by endorsement. Consultant shall keep all insurance current during the term of the contract.

29


SECTION 3 – FORMS

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE "A"

Consultant shall fully complete a Proposal Schedule and return it with their submitted Proposal in a sealed envelope. All submitted Proposals shall include all fee elements associated with the Scope of Services to be provided as a result of this RFP. If necessary, additional fee sheets may be provided.

30


SECTION 3 - FORMS

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE "A"

Page Two

______________________________________ _________________________________________

Signature Company Name

______________________________________ _________________________________________ Printed Name Business License Number

______________________________________ _________________________________________ Title Date

31


CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION 1. Legal Name of Consultant: _____________________________________________________ 2. Street Address: ______________________________________________________________ 3. Mailing Address:______________________________________________________________ 4. Business Telephone: __________________________ 5. Facsimile Telephone:__________________________ 6. Type of Business: Sole Proprietor Partnership Corporation LLC LLP Other: _____________________________________________ Indicate State of formation: _________________________________ 7. Business License number issued by the City where the Consultant's principal place of business

is located. License Number: ____________________________________ Issuing City: ________________________________________ 8. Federal Tax Identification Number: _______________________________________________ 9. Consultant's Contact Person: ____________________________________________________

32


REFERENCES AND SUBCONTRACTORS Provide at least five (5) references for which similar services have been provided within the last three (3) years. Use additional sheets as necessary. (Reference Section 2. Paragraph G. above for more specific information).

Agency Contact(s) Address Phone No. E-Mail

Date of Service: ________________ Description of Services Performed:








Date of Service: ________________ Description of Services Performed: NOTE REGARDING SUBCONTRACTORS: No Subcontractors shall be utilized unless: (1) Specifically authorized in writing by SAWPA’s Chief Financial Officer; and, (2) an appropriate contract amendment has been signed by Consultant and SAWPA.)

33


WORKERS' COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE The Consultant shall execute the following form as required by California Labor Code §§ 1860 and 1861: I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code §3700 which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and on behalf of my firm, I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services of any contract entered into. ______________________________________ _________________________________________



______________________________________ _________________________________________ Title Date

34


NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT State of California ) ) ss. County of ) __________________________________ [name], being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is __________________________________________ [title], of ("Consultant") the party making the foregoing Proposal that the Proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the Proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the Consultant has not directly or indirectly solicited any other Consultant to put in a false or sham Proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any Consultant or anyone else to put in a sham Proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the Consultant has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the Proposal fee or the Consultant or any other Consultant, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Proposal fee, or of that of any other Consultant, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the Proposal are true; and, further, that the Consultant has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his/her/its Proposal fee or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham Proposal. ______________________________________ _________________________________________



______________________________________ _________________________________________ Title Date

35


EXCEPTION FORM Should your firm take exception to ANY of the terms and conditions or other contents provided in the "Request for Proposals," list the exceptions below. THIS COMPLETED FORM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR PROPOSAL. If no exception(s) are taken, enter "NONE" for the first item. (Make additional copies of this form as necessary) Page Number: Section Title: _____________________________________________________ Paragraph Number: Exception Taken: _____________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Page Number: Section Title: _____________________________________________________ Paragraph Number: Exception Taken: ______________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Page Number: Section Title: _____________________________________________________ Paragraph Number: Exception Taken: ______________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________

36


SECTION 4 -SCOPE OF SERVICES

Classification and Compensation Study SCOPE OF SERVICES The Study shall include, but is not limited to the following activities: A. CLASSIFICATION STUDY:

1. Consultant to meet with staff to discuss Study and agree on methodology and Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) to be used.

2. Consultant to meet with Department Managers to explain study and processes to be used.

3. Employees to complete PDQs and Department Managers review and comment (not

change). Copies of the completed PDQs will be returned to employees following review and comment by Department Managers.

4. Consultant to conduct interviews and/or job audits as appropriate. Interviews and/or job

audits may be conducted individually or in groups based upon classification.

5. Consultant to compare PDQ, interview and job audit results to existing job descriptions.

6. Consultant to update and/or create class specifications as needed to uniformly reflect distinguishing characteristics, essential job functions, minimum qualifications, working conditions, license requirements, regulatory requirements, standby/call-out responsibilities, etc., for all classifications.

7. Consultant to identify employee classifications including FLSA status (exempt/non-

exempt).

8. Consultant to draft and submit proposed class specifications for review by Agency. Consultant will recommend, if appropriate, classification series and levels within the series (i.e. I/II, Senior/Lead, etc.) In addition, Consultant to review reporting/organizational structure and make suggestions to more effectively align resources across the organization. All class specifications to be submitted in Microsoft Word Version 2010.

9. Consultant to present proposed class specifications to the General Manager and

Department Managers, and receive and incorporate input prior to classification determinations.

10. Consultant to finalize class specifications and recommend appropriate classification for

each position, including correction of identified discrepancies between existing and proposed classifications.

11. Consultant to identify career ladders/promotional opportunities for each classification.

12. Consultant to provide weekly written updates on data collection and progress as well as in

person meetings as warranted and upon request.

37


B. COMPENSATION STUDY:

1. Review current compensation (including all benefits) practices and related issues.

2. Consultant to conduct salary survey by comparing monthly maximum base salary for each

existing classification (see Exhibit B). Included in the survey will be the compensation and benefit structure for each member agency and other external markets.

3. Compare all employee salaries and benefit packages to internal (Member Agencies) and external markets. Determine if there are compression or inequity problems and make recommendations for improvements.

4. For the Member Agencies and other external markets, provide a comparative review of total compensation, including the following:

a. Salary; b. Health care benefits; c. Retirement benefits (CalPERS and Social Security), including retirement medical

benefits; d. Vacation, sick, administrative/executive, holidays, floating holidays and/or longevity

pay; e. Long-term disability and life insurance; f. Certification, licensing and degree incentives; g. Holiday bonuses/other bonuses; h. Vehicle allowances; i. Performance awards; j. Education reimbursement; k. Professional memberships; l. Employee Assistance Program; and, m. Other benefits.

5. Consultant to recommend appropriate salary range for each existing or proposed position

based on the Classification Plan and on the compensation survey results, and internal relationships and equity.

6. In addition to above, Consultant to recommend salary range for each position based on

median and mean salary of the comparable agencies. In addition, consultant to prepare a new salary step plan.

7. Provide written report of methods, techniques and data for the assessment of each position.

38


C. DEVELOP METHOD TO MITIGATE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION OBLIGATION:

1. Develop a method to mitigate SAWPA’s retirement contribution obligation in the future for pre-2013 employees by setting a total contribution level for agency employees to fund the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC).

2. Review each Member Agency’s current practice of converting the Employer Paid Member

Contribution (EPMC) to be paid by the employee instead of the employer.

3. Consider SAWPA’s current payroll, retirement benefit formula, and demographics when evaluating potential methods so that a level of benefits comparable to Member Agencies is maintained.

4. As an important component in the development and evaluation of potential EPMC

mitigation methods, consideration of any resultant financial impacts to SAWPA employees as to each potential method evaluation shall be considered.

D. SUGGESTED PROPOSAL SCHEDULE:

Release Request for Proposals July 15, 2014 Proposal Submittal Deadline August 18, 2014 Review Proposals & Select Top Candidates August 25, 2014 Interview Top Candidates September 3, 2014 Notice of Selection/Contract Negotiations September 10, 2014 Commission Approval September 16, 2014 Kick Off Meeting/Recommendations September 29, 2014 Project Completion December 31, 2014

E. PROPOSAL FORMAT:

Each Proposal shall, at a minimum, be organized to clearly address the following requirements:

1. Agents and Experience: Consultant shall provide a summary of relevant experience and capabilities relative to the Scope of Services of the designated project manager and support staff (include organization chart of your proposed team). Include a schedule showing the hours and percentage of time each individual is expected to contribute to the Study per phase.

List the address, telephone, fax and email contact information for the person to serve as Project Manager. Résumés summarizing the qualifications and experience of the individuals who will be conducting the Study must be provided. Project Manager and lead personnel assigned to the project shall not be reassigned without prior written approval by the Agency.

2. Statement of Methods and Procedures:

Provide a statement describing the Scope of Services as you understand it, and describe the approach, means, methods and procedures to be employed to gather the data, analyze findings and develop recommendations as requested, including the method of

39


keeping the Agency informed on the progress of the Study. Provide a sample Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ).

3. Structure and Content of Work Product: Describe the way in which the work product will be structured and presented upon completion. All work product, presentations, etc., shall be compatible with MS Office 2010.

4. Work Schedule:

Provide a timeline showing key milestones, tasks required, and the start/completion dates for each. It is expected the work will commence on September 29, 2014, and be completed on or before December 31, 2014.

5. References:

All submitted Proposals shall include a Reference List with at least five (5) public agencies for whom they have provided similar services within the last three (3) years. The Reference List must be in the form referenced herein and contain the information referenced in Section 2. Paragraph G. of this RFP.

6. Fee:

The fee proposal shall be SEALED in a separate envelope, which will not be opened until after other evaluation criteria have been considered. Please reference Section 3 – Forms of this RFP. The fee proposal should include:

a. A total cost estimate and not-to-exceed amount for the work described in the Scope

of Services; b. Rate schedule for computing any extra work not specified in the contracted Scope of

Services, including hourly rates for all positions plus unit costs for incidental expenses.

40

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8915 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Approval of the final OWOW 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation Interregional

Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program and Adoption of Resolution No. 2014-08, Authorizing Execution of a Grant Agreement with the Department of Water Resources

PREPARED BY: Mark Norton, Water Resources and Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION The following is recommended: 1) Approval of the final OWOW 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation Interregional Landscape Water

Demand Reduction Program, including execution of the joint letter between the Santa Ana River Watershed Regional Water Management Group and the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed Regional Water Management Group in order to incorporate it into the final proposal.

2) Adoption of Resolution No. 2014-08, Authorizing Execution of a Grant Agreement with the Department of Water Resources (DWR).

DISCUSSION At its May 20, 2014 meeting, the Commission approved the One Water One Watershed abridged process that would allow the development for a single watershed wide program for the 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation. A program concept developed by the Santa Ana River Watermaster Action Team was presented to the Commission during that meeting. Subsequent to that meeting, the Santa Ana River Watermaster Action Team and SAWPA have worked to develop the final proposal, referred to as the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program, for the 2014 Solicitation. If approved, the proposal would be sent to the Department of Water Resources by their due date of July 21, 2014. The total proposal cost is $22.9 million, with $12.9 million in Proposition 84 funding and a cost share of $10 million. The final program reflects an interregional Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) proposal in which IRWM grant funding also is requested by the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed IRWM from the San Diego Funding Area portion to support the SAWPA IRWM grant submittal to extend the proposal’s work into areas of Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Western Municipal Water District (WMWD) and Rancho California Water District in the Upper Santa Margarita IRWM area. $11.8 million of the grant funds would come from the Santa Ana Funding Area and the remaining $1.1 million from the San Diego Funding Area. Through the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program, immediate and sustainable water conservation will be achieved by removing turf, providing feedback to customers on their water use, and/or implementation of conservation based rate structures. This program is grouped into three main components:

1) Turf Removal for Commercial/Institutional/Homeowners Association (HOA) Parcels 2) Technology-Based Information Systems 3) Development of Conservation-Based Water Rates

The program can be immediately implemented to mitigate drought reduction of water supply with water savings commencing in the first year. It is a multi-agency collaborative effort to implement water conservation across two watersheds, three counties, six regional water agencies and 100 retail water agencies. The lead program proponent will be SAWPA, with implementation to be administered by a new SAWPA Project Implementation Committee composed of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Orange County Water District, EMWD and WMWD with input from the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed (USMW) Regional Water Management Group.

41

CM#8915 July 15, 2014 Page 2 As part of the proposal to DWR, a joint-letter is required between the IRWM watershed’s Regional Water Management Groups. Also required is that the applicant’s governing body provide a resolution to submit the application and execute an agreement with the State of California. Under this resolution, SAWPA would submit the application to DWR by the deadline of July 21, 2014. Upon DWR’s approval of the final grant award for this solicitation, SAWPA would enter into a grant agreement with the State agency. A similar resolution was adopted by the Commission for Proposition 84 Round 1 and Round 2. Further Background 1) The Turf Removal for Commercial/Institutional/HOA Parcels component will integrate grant funds with

local agencies’ turf removal programs to target Commercial/Institutional/HOA’s large turf parcels. It will provide an additional $1 per square foot funding (total up to $3 per square foot) to better incentivize non-residential parcels to remove 4.95 million square feet of turf.

2) The Technology-Based Information System component will include water consumption reporting by using

software and Web-based information to deliver personalized water use efficiency information to customers. Water consumption reporting will reach approximately 150,000 customers, resulting in an estimated conservation and cumulative reduction of imported water need by 9,700 AFY in three years. The system will be integrated into the agencies active water use efficiency program and will deliver individualized water consumption reports to retail water agency customers showing comparisons of household water use to similar homes, and customized messaging and recommendations for taking water conservation actions.

3) The Development of Conservation Based Water Rates component will be implemented for up to ten water

agencies, in addition to educating policy makers and staff of the majority of agencies in the watershed on the benefit of creating an outdoor efficiency benchmark standard for conservation-based rates. Assuming an average five percent (5%) demand reduction (different rate structures will have varying effectiveness on conservation), average annual water demand will decrease by approximately 4,800 AFY in three years.

To supplement the components of the program, high resolution imagery with infrared and remote sensing technology (Light Detection and Ranging or “Lidar”) would be taken during a fly-over of the urban areas of the watershed. The resulting data would allow entities to implement these components of the program. It could provide vegetated area classification for land parcels and potentially help develop a water budget development for each parcel. Economies of scale will reduce the cost of this mapping, and also provide this tool to water agencies that might not otherwise utilize this technology due to cost constraints. Bob Ohlund, lead agency consultant for the Santa Ana River Watermaster Action Team, will present highlights of the proposal during the July 15 meeting. RESOURCE IMPACTS The costs of the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program would be provided by the project proponent’s cost share of $10 million ($8 million for the Santa Ana River Watershed IRWM, and $2 million for the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed IRWM) and $12.9 million in Proposition 84 Implementation Grant under this solicitation ($11.8 million for the Santa Ana River Watershed IRWM and $1.1 million for the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed IRWM). The total cost for the Program is $22.9 million. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 2014-08 2) Joint letter between the Santa Ana River Watershed RWMG and Upper Santa Margarita Watershed

RWMG. CM 8915 Approval-Final Proposal_InterregionalLandscapeWaterDemandReduction

42

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

AUTHORIZING PREPARATION AND SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

TO OBTAIN AN INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GRANT

WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority is recognized by the State of California as the regional planning agency to coordinate, prepare, and implement Integrated Regional Water;

WHEREAS, the agency recently conducted a process as part of its One Water One Watershed planning process where the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program was identified and would provide immediate and sustainable water conservation as well as multiple benefits to the region;

WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority has demonstrated that the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program has been vetted through the Regional Water Management Group;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) hereby authorizes that an application be prepared and submitted to the California Department of Water Resources to obtain an Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Public Resource Code Section 75001 et seq.), and to enter into an agreement to receive grant funding for the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to prepare the necessary data, conduct investigations, file such application, and execute a grant agreement with the California Department of Water Resources.

ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2014.


By: ____________________________________ Phil Anthony, Chair

43


44

July 15, 2 Zaffar EuCaliforniaDivision oFinancial1416 9th Post OfficSacrameEmail: M Subject:

Dear Mr. The SanManagemRegional innovativWater DimplemeimplemeUpper Saarea of t(235 squa This intebrings tstakeholdthe regiowater uswater sav Both WeDistrict (service aSanta Mawater agMargaritvariety oprogramsa perfecamong th

2014

suff a Departmenof Integrated Assistance BStreet, Roomce Box 94283nto, CA 9423uzaffar.Eusu

Support foRegion andthe 2014 Dr

Eusuff:

nta Ana Wment GroupWater Ma

ve interregioDemand Redunted watersnted within anta Margarithe Upper Sare miles) of

rregional paogether a ders to implons, as identse efficiency vings and wa

estern MunicEMWD), whreas within targarita Watgency of botha Watershedof highly sus. This existinct partnershhe agencies.

nt of Water Rd Regional WBranch m 338 36 36 [email protected]

or Interregiod the Upper rought Grant

Watershed Pp and the anagement Gonal water usuction Progrshed‐wide inthe service ita WatersheSanta Margaf the total wa

rtnership, accollaboratioement a protified in the and conser

ater use effic

cipal Water Dholesale and the Santa Antershed. Ranh WMWD and. RCWD cuuccessful regng and proveip to contin

Resources Water Manage

a.gov

onal ProjectSanta Margt Proposal So

Project AuthUpper SantGroup havese efficiency ram, Phase In the Santa areas of th

ed, encomparita Watershatershed.

cross fundingon of multiogram that wfunding apprvation measiency on an e

District (WMretail wate

na River Watcho Californnd EMWD, anrrently partngional wateren relationshnue the exc

ement

t Between tgarita Waterolicitation

hority, (SAWta Margaritae joined tog program, “II (Program)”Ana River W

hree water sassing the mahed and app

g areas and iple agenciewill have broplication. Thesures to achexpedited sc

MWD) and Ear service protershed and nia Water Disnd is wholly ners with Wr use efficiehip makes thcellent work

the Santa Arshed IRWM

WPA) Regioa Watershegether to pInterregional”. The ProgrWatershed aservice suppajority of theproximately

watershed es, organizaoad benefits e Program whieve a greachedule.

astern Munioviders, maia portion ofstrict (RCWDwithin the U

WMWD and Eency and coe interregionk already ac

Ana IRWM Region for

onal Water ed (USMW)propose an l Landscaperam will beand will be pliers in the e urbanized 37 percent

boundaries, ations, and throughout

will enhance ter level of

cipal Water intain retail f the Upper D) is a retail Upper Santa EMWD in a onservation nal program ccomplished

45

Mr. Zaffar Eusuff July 15, 2014 Page 2

SAWPA, its One Water One Watershed Steering Committee and stakeholders support this interregional partnership to implement the Program to expand benefits and provide immediate regional and interregional drought preparedness. The Upper Santa Margarita Watershed and its Stakeholders Advisory Committee also fully support the interregional partnership to expand the proposed program across watershed boundaries and has committed a portion of its San Diego Funding Area Proposition 84 funding allocation. SAWPA is the lead applicant and the one DWR‐recognized IRWM region within the Santa Ana River Watershed. As such, SAWPA and the USMW IRWM Region have agreed for SAWPA to administer the Program and the funding agreement with DWR. The USMW IRWM Region has committed funding from the San Diego Funding Area for the Program through its allocation under the Memorandum of Understanding for Integrated Regional Water Management Planning and Funding in the San Diego Sub‐Region Funding Area (also known as the Tri‐County Funding Area Coordinating Committee Agreement), which equitably apportions Proposition 84 funds among the three IRWM regions in the San Diego Funding Area. Total Interregional Program costs are estimated at $22.9 million with a 2014 IRWM Drought Grant request of $12.9 million, with a 44 percent match. The Program clearly meets the objectives of the One Water One Watershed Plan 2.0 adopted in February 2014 and the 2014 Upper Santa Margarita Watershed IRWM Plan Update adopted in May 2014, as demonstrated in the application. SAWPA and RCWD have already discussed process and collaboration on planning and implementation of the Program across IRWM Regions and are prepared to implement a successful program.

The Santa Ana River Watershed RWMG and the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed RWMG appreciates your thoughtful consideration of our proposed interregional water use efficiency program. We are looking forward and committed to successfully working collaboratively across regional boundaries and with DWR to implement this innovative program.

Sincerely, SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED IRWM REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT GROUP

Phil Anthony SAWPA Commissioner Chair

46

Mr. Zaffar July 15, 20Page 3

Eusuff 14

UPPER SAN

Steven C. Upper SantaCounty of Ri

Jason UhleUpper SantaRiverside Co

Richard WUpper SantaRancho Calif

NTA MARGARIT

Horn a Margarita IRWiverside

ey a Margarita IRWounty Flood Co

Williamson a Margarita IRWfornia Water D

TA WATERSHED

WM RWMG

WM RWMG ontrol & Water

WM RWMG District

D IRWM REGIO

Conservation

ONAL WATER M

District

MANAGEMENT GGROUP

47


48

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8916 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: OWOW 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation Project Implementation PREPARED BY: Mark R. Norton, Water Resources & Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION The OWOW Steering Committee recommends approval of the proposed implementation plan for the OWOW 2014 Emergency Drought Grant Solicitation Project, the Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program. DISCUSSION The Interregional Landscape Water Demand Reduction Program is a multi-agency collaborative effort to implement water conservation across two watersheds, three counties, six regional water agencies, and 100 retail water agencies. There are four portions of the Program: 1. Commercial, Institutional, & HOA Turf Removal 2. Technology-Based Information Systems Outreach 3. Conservation Based Rate Structures Planning 4. Aerial Imagery/Mapping To implement the four portions of the Program, it is recommended that the Commission establish a project implementation committee and its sub-committee: Project Implementation Committee - Composed of the five SAWPA Commissioners, or their

designees with input from the Upper Santa Margarita Watershed (USMW) Regional Water Management Group.

Water Use Efficiency Technical Sub-Committee (Technical Committee) - Composed of water use efficiency or water resource staff from the five SAWPA Member Agencies, SAWPA staff, and the USMW Regional Water Management Group.

The Project Implementation Committee will meet monthly and the Technical Committee will meet every two months over the duration of the implementation of the Program, or until the project is completed. Progress reports will be provided to the OWOW Steering Committee and the SAWPA Commission. SAWPA staff will administer the Committees by using the best data and management techniques available to reach the implementation benchmarks, and produce the monitoring plans that will define what data is presented in the post-performance reporting. The Technical Committee will define several issues over the period of implementation, including the criteria of the turf removal, whether the conservation-based rate structures element can be expanded to commercial institutions, the specific areas within the watershed that will be mapped, and aggregating the water use data from the retail agencies.

49

CM# 8916 July 15, 2014 Page 2 RESOURCE IMPACTS Facilitation and administration of the project implementation committees would be funded by the requested Proposition 84 Implementation Grant under the 2014 solicitation. The total portion for the project implementation is estimated to be $299,357. CM 8916 Implement Plan Interregionalcc

50

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8912 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 2014-09 Calling for Greater Water Use Efficiency to

Address the Current Drought PREPARED BY: Celeste Cantú, General Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission consider and adopt Resolution No. 2014-09, and send a letter to the California State Water Resources Control Board concerning their proposed emergency regulations pertaining to the prohibition of activities and mandatory actions during the drought emergency. DISCUSSION During the July 1, 2014 meeting, Commissioner Anthony expressed concern regarding the drought impacting Southern California for the past three years, noting we should consider what more we ought to be doing as these severe drought conditions continue. Even though Southern California has led the way in water planning and storage projects, we are now into the third year utilizing a four-year storage supply. The Commission directed staff to craft a policy addressing how we deal with the drought moving forward. The attached Resolution No. 2014-09 calls for greater water use efficiency to address the current drought. This Resolution commends investments that have been made toward greater water use efficiency and addresses taking stronger measures to reduce current use, while calling on all water agencies within the watershed to recognize and treat the current drought as a severe threat. Staff also recommends that the Commission authorize sending a letter to the California State Water Resources Control Board concerning their proposed emergency regulations RESOURCE IMPACTS None. Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2014-09 CM 8912 Adopt Reso Re Water Use Efficiency 7-15-14

51


52

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

CALLING FOR GREATER WATER USE EFFICIENCY TO ADDRESS THE CURRENT DROUGHT

WHEREAS the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority is a joint powers agency of large water districts and is charged with regional planning for water resources management in the Santa Ana River watershed;

WHEREAS the mission of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority includes improving the watersheds resilience in droughts;

WHEREAS the One Water, One Watershed 2.0 (OWOW) Plan includes a goal to “maintain reliable

and resilient water supplies and reduce dependency on imported water,” including objectives of reducing demand, increasing water use efficiency, developing local resources, increasing recycling, and maintaining sufficient storage to overcome a three-year drought;

WHEREAS California is experiencing a drought of historic intensity, and the duration of the drought

is unpredictable;

WHEREAS the Governor declared a drought emergency in January 2014, called for a 20% reduction is use statewide, and foreseeably may bring forward more specific requirements mandating water use reduction;

WHEREAS many water agencies in the Santa Ana River watershed have experienced significant reductions in water use due to voluntary reductions;

WHEREAS water agencies across the Santa Ana River watershed have invested significantly in water

use efficiency programs including substantial investments in stormwater capture, groundwater desalting, and water recycling; conservation rate structures; public education; financial incentives for efficient appliance retrofitting and landscape retrofitting; and passing, implementing, and enforcing conservation ordinances;

WHEREAS the OWOW Plan states that water use efficiency practices are among the highest priority

resource management strategies in the watershed; WHEREAS twenty-four percent of the retail water customers in the watershed are served by agencies

with water budget based rates, a rate structure that bases pricing on specific information about efficient use on each parcel and that therefore directly measures water use efficiency, and the vast majority of those customers are remaining within efficient water use budgets;

WHEREAS across the entire watershed, per capita water use already has been reduced to well below

the goal of reducing water use by 20 percent, six years before the State’s 2020 target; WHEREAS agencies in the watershed produce and use 285,000 acre-feet per year of recycled water,

meeting approximately 20 percent of the total water demand in the watershed; WHEREAS focusing on water usage rather than water use efficiency presents an inaccurate picture of

the effectiveness of ongoing drought response measures; WHEREAS actions to reduce demand in the near term must take into account investments that have

been made in water use efficiency both to maximize effectiveness and to be fair to water users, and therefore specific direction on reductions to be achieved should come from the regional level;

53

WHEREAS Metropolitan Water District’s public statements have focused on the benefits this year of being able to withdraw water from storage in order to avoid the immediate impacts of the drought in its service area;

WHEREAS Metropolitan Water District’s storage will not suffice to insulate Southern California

from severe prolonged drought impacts through another below normal winter; WHEREAS because of the supply portfolio on which the watershed relies, a critical and urgent

concern in the current drought in this watershed is the effect on drinking water and groundwater quality; WHEREAS while much has been done to improve drought resilience in the watershed, more can and

must be achieved;

WHEREAS taking stronger measures to reduce use now is a sensible step to take, in the current situation, as reduced use will stretch storage and carrying over more storage into next spring could be vital to the watershed and the State;

WHEREAS higher profile efforts for use reduction in the Santa Ana River watershed will support a greater community of purpose with harder hit localities in northern California, and California needs political unity this year to address the larger water system issues, as well as the drought;

WHEREAS permanent reduction in use—through both hard demand reduction and durable water use

efficiency improvements through culture change—is a wise investment for our region, which must prepare for the longer term potential for the current climate to be the new normal.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission of the Santa Ana Watershed

Project Authority hereby:

1. Recognizes that water supply is a statewide issue, that regions and localities are differently situated, but that water agencies throughout the State should be working to address urgent water supply challenges;

2. Acknowledges and commends the investments that have been made toward greater water use efficiency by many water agencies in the watershed;

3. Recognizes that water use efficiency is a more appropriate focus for resources planning than generalized goals for reduced water usage;

4. Directs SAWPA to communicate to the State of California information about the investments that have been made and the results that have been achieved to improve water use efficiency in the watershed through demand reduction, education, rate structures, and recycling;

5. Finds that the current drought is severe, that the impacts have been only temporarily offset by the use of storage, and that more urgent response is called for to address near term supply issues;

6. Calls upon all water agencies in the watershed to recognize and treat the current drought as a severe threat, in particular by immediately invoking their drought and shortage ordinances or plans to implement measures appropriate to a severe drought; and,

7. Calls upon all water agencies and stakeholders in the watershed to work with SAWPA and its member agencies to identify the most successful drought response and demand reduction measures, and to identify resources that can be used to reinforce those efforts, to apply those strategies in other parts of the watershed as appropriate, and to achieve more near-term demand reduction.

ADOPTED this 15thday of July, 2014.


By: _________________________________________ Phil Anthony, Chair

54

Legislative Status Report for SAWPA 7/2/2014

AB 69 (Perea D) Groundwater: drinking water: Nitrate at Risk Fund. Current Text: Amended: 8/12/2013 pdf html Introduced: 1/10/2013 Last Amend: 8/12/2013 Status: 8/12/2013-From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee.

Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI. Location: 8/12/2013-S. AGRI. Summary: Would establish the Nitrate at Risk Fund, to be administered by the State Department of Public

Health. This bill would continuously appropriate, without regard to fiscal years, the fund to the department for the purposes of loans, principal forgiveness loans, or grants to certain water systems operating in a high-nitrate at-risk area for specified purposes. This bill would require the state board, on or before January 1, 2022, to submit a report to the Legislature that includes specified information relating to the fund and contaminated drinking water. This bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2024. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

AB 380 (Dickinson D) Spill response for railroads. Current Text: Amended: 6/16/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/14/2013 Last Amend: 6/16/2014 Status: 6/16/2014-In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. From committee chair, with author's

amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Location: 6/16/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: Would require a rail carrier, as defined, to report specified information regarding the

transportation of hazardous materials, beginning no later than January 31, 2015, to the Office of Emergency Services on a quarterly basis. The bill would require each rail carrier to maintain a response management communications center, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

AB 793 (Gray D) San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Conservancy. Current Text: Amended: 6/26/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2013 Last Amend: 6/26/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Read second time. Ordered to third reading. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to

Senate Rule 29.10(c). Location: 6/30/2014-S. THIRD READING Summary: Current law authorizes various conservancies to acquire, manage, direct the management of, and

conserve public lands in the state. This bill would establish the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Conservancy, to undertake various activities related to the San Joaquin Valley, as defined, and would prescribe the management, powers, and duties of the conservancy. The bill would create the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Conservancy Fund in the State Treasury. Moneys in the fund would be available, upon appropriation, for the purposes of the conservancy.

AB 1043 (Chau D) Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006: groundwater contamination.

Current Text: Amended: 5/19/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/22/2013 Last Amend: 5/19/2014 Status: 6/23/2014-Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/23/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair

55

Summary: Current law requires the Department of Public Health, in collaboration with the Department of Toxic Substances Control, or DTSC, and the State Water Resources Control Board, to develop and adopt regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater. This bill would eliminate the requirement to develop and adopt regulations and instead would require that costs subsequently recovered from a party responsible for the contamination, as defined, be repaid to the State Department of Public Health and deposited, and separately accounted for, in the Groundwater Contamination Cleanup Project Fund, which this bill would create in the State Treasury.

AB 1249 (Salas D) Integrated regional water management plans: nitrate, arsenic, perchlorate, or hexavalent

chromium contamination. Current Text: Amended: 6/30/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/22/2013 Last Amend: 6/30/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/30/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: The the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal

Protection Bond Act of 2006 requires that eligible projects implement integrated regional water management plans that meet specified criteria and requires the department to give preference to certain proposals. This bill would make the guidelines applicable to all funds that are or may become available for integrated regional water management plan implementation.

AB 1331 (Rendon D) Clean, Safe, and Reliable Drinking Water Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 6/17/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/22/2013 Last Amend: 6/17/2014 Status: 6/18/2014-Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. Location: 6/18/2014-S. RLS. Summary: (1) Current law, the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, if approved

by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Current law provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. Bill would repeal these provisions. Bill contains other related provisions and other current laws.

AB 1445 (Logue R) California Water Infrastructure Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 2/14/2014 pdf html Introduced: 1/6/2014 Last Amend: 2/14/2014 Status: 4/24/2014-In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. Location: 2/18/2014-A. W.,P. & W. Summary: Current law creates the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, which, if

approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Current law provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. This bill would repeal these provisions. This bill contains other related provisions and other current laws.

AB 1527 (Perea D) Public water systems: Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. Current Text: Amended: 6/26/2014 pdf html Introduced: 1/17/2014 Last Amend: 6/26/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/30/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair

56

Summary: Current law, operative on July 1, 2014, and repealed as of January 1 of the next calendar year occurring after the State Water Resources Control Board provides notice to the Legislature and the Secretary of State and posts notice on its Internet Web site that the board has adopted a policy handbook, requires the board to establish a priority list of proposed projects to be considered for funding. This bill would require the board to give priority to funding the consolidation of public water systems based upon a service review developed by a local agency formation commission.

AB 1630 (Alejo D) Water quality: integrated plan: Salinas Valley. Current Text: Amended: 5/27/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/10/2014 Last Amend: 5/27/2014 Status: 6/5/2014-Referred to Com. on E.Q. Location: 6/5/2014-S. E.Q. Summary: Would appropriate $500,000 from the Waste Discharge Permit Fund, as specified, to the State

Water Resources Control Board for use by the Greater Monterey County Regional Water Management Group to develop an integrated plan to address the drinking water and wastewater needs of disadvantaged communities in the Salinas Valley whose waters have been affected by waste discharges, thereby making an appropriation. This bill contains other related provisions.

AB 1739 (Dickinson D) Groundwater management. Current Text: Amended: 6/17/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/14/2014 Last Amend: 6/17/2014 Status: 6/25/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 24).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/25/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: Would require all groundwater basins designated as high-or medium-priority basins by the

Department of Water Resources to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans, with specified exceptions. This bill would require a groundwater sustainability agency to certify that its plan complies with the requirements of this bill no later than January 31, 2020, and every 5 years thereafter.

AB 1896 (V. Manuel Pérez D) Coachella Valley Water District: nonpotable water use. Current Text: Amended: 4/7/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/19/2014 Last Amend: 4/7/2014 Status: 6/26/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to

consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/26/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: Current law prohibits a person or local public agency from using, within the district's service

area, water from any source that is suitable for potable domestic use for nonpotable uses for cemeteries, parks, highway landscaped areas, new industrial facilities, and golf course irrigation if the board of directors of the district determines that suitable nonpotable water is available. This bill would add the use of potable domestic water for landscaped common areas of residential developments maintained by a homeowner's association as a prohibited use if the board of directors of the district determines that suitable nonpotable water is available.

AB 2043 (Bigelow R) Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 5/19/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 5/19/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.

57

Location: 5/21/2014-A. APPR. Calendar: 7/2/2014 Upon Call of the Chair - State Capitol, Room 4202

ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS, GATTO, Chair Summary: The Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, if approved by the voters,

would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Current law provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. This bill would repeal these provisions.

AB 2170 (Mullin D) Joint powers authorities: common powers. Current Text: Amended: 6/17/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 6/17/2014 Status: 6/17/2014-Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. Location: 6/17/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #111 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-THIRD READING FILE Summary: Current law provides that 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, may form a joint powers

authority to exercise any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. This bill would provide that the parties to the agreement may exercise any power common to the contracting parties, including, but not limited to, the authority to levy a fee , assessment, or tax, as specified.

AB 2193 (Gordon D) Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Act. Current Text: Amended: 6/17/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 6/17/2014 Status: 6/25/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 24).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/25/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: Would enact the Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Act and require the Director of Fish and

Wildlife to approve a habitat restoration or enhancement project, as defined, if specified conditions are met as determined by the director. The act would create the Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Account within the Fish and Game Preservation Fund and authorize the department to enter into an agreement to accept funds to achieve the purposes of the Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Act and deposit those funds into that account.

AB 2259 (Ridley-Thomas D) Water replenishment: assessments. Current Text: Amended: 7/1/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 7/1/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. Location: 7/1/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #206 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-THIRD READING FILE Summary: The Water Replenishment District Act requires the governing board of each district to follow

specified procedural processes when determining whether to assess, and the amount of, a replenishment assessment. This bill would require that a judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul a resolution or motion made on or after January 1, 2015, levying a replenishment assessment pursuant to those provisions be commenced within 180 days of the adoption of the resolution or motion. The bill would also require that an action brought on or after January 1, 2015, regarding the replenishment assessment be brought pursuant to specified provisions regarding civil proceedings.

AB 2282 (Gatto D) Building standards: recycled water infrastructure. Current Text: Amended: 5/8/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 5/8/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)

58

Location: 7/1/2014-S. SECOND READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #11 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-SECOND READING FILE Summary: Would require the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with

other designated entities, to conduct research to assist in the development of, and to propose the adoption, amendment, or repeal by the California Building Standards Commission, of mandatory building standards for the installation of recycled water infrastructure for newly constructed single-family and multifamily residential buildings.

AB 2442 (Gordon D) Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act: remedial action: liability. Current Text: Amended: 7/1/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 7/1/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. Location: 7/1/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #207 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-THIRD READING FILE Summary: Would prohibit the State Water Resources Control Board or a regional bored from being held

liable in a civil proceeding for trespass or any other acts that are necessary to carry out investigations or corrective actions. This bill would also prohibit the state board, regional board, or any authorized person from incurring any obligation to undertake additional investigation, cleanup, abatement, or other remedial work solely because of its decision to undertake that work.

AB 2446 (Waldron R) Standby charges: San Luis Rey Municipal Water District. Current Text: Amended: 5/28/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 5/28/2014 Status: 6/26/2014-Read second time. Ordered to third reading. Location: 6/26/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #164 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-THIRD READING FILE Summary: Would prohibit a standby assessment or availability charge levied for the San Luis Rey

Municipal Water District from exceeding $30 per acre per year for land on which the charge is levied or $30 per year for a parcel less than one acre. This bill would require the proceeds from the standby assessment or availability charge to be used for the purposes of management of local water supply and its quality.

AB 2453 (Achadjian R) Paso Robles Basin Water District. Current Text: Amended: 3/28/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 3/28/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 24). Location: 6/24/2014-S. SECOND READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #46 SENATE ASSEMBLY BILLS-SECOND READING FILE Summary: Would set forth the composition of, and method of election by landowners and registered voters

for, the board of directors for the Paso Robles Basin Water District, the boundaries of which shall be established and may be modified by the San Luis Obispo County Local Agency Formation Commission.

AB 2554 (Rendon D) Clean, Safe, and Reliable Drinking Water Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 4/23/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 4/23/2014 Status: 4/30/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (April 29).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 4/30/2014-A. APPR. Summary: Current law, the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, if approved by

the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Current law provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. Bill would repeal these provisions. Bill contains other related provisions and other current laws.

59

AB 2636 (Gatto D) CalConserve Water Use Efficiency Revolving Fund. Current Text: Amended: 6/30/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 6/30/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/30/2014-S. APPR. Calendar: 8/4/2014 10 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203) SENATE APPROPRIATIONS, DE

LEóN, Chair Summary: Would establish the CalConserve Water Use Efficiency Revolving Fund and provide that the

moneys in the fund are available to the Department of Water Resources, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of water use efficiency projects. This bill would require moneys in the fund to be used for purposes that include, but are not limited to, at-or-below market interest rate loans to local agencies, as defined, and would permit the department to enter into agreements with local agencies that provide water or recycled water service to provide loans. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

AB 2686 (Perea D) Clean, Safe, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 5/1/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 5/1/2014 Status: 6/30/2014-Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. Location: 6/30/2014-A. APPR. Calendar: 7/2/2014 Upon Call of the Chair - State Capitol, Room 4202

ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS, GATTO, Chair Summary: Current law, the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, if approved by

he voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Current aw provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general lection. Bill would repeal these provisions. Bill contains other related provisions and other current laws.

AB 2712 (Daly D) Hazardous materials: Orange County Water District: groundwater remediation. Current Text: Amended: 7/1/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 7/1/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 7/1/2014-S. APPR. Summary: Would require the Orange County Water District, when cleaning up or containing contamination

or pollution, abating the effects of the contamination or pollution, or, in the case of threatened contamination or pollution, taking other emergency, removal, or remedial action to provide notice of the action to a regional water quality control board and the Department of Toxic Substances Control, to meet and confer with agencies and any responsible party, and to comply with the requirements of the National Contingency Plan, as prescribed. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

SB 848 (Wolk D) Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality, and Water Supply Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 6/23/2014 pdf html Introduced: 1/9/2014 Last Amend: 6/23/2014 Status: 6/23/2014-Withdrawn from committee. Ordered to third reading. Urgency clause refused adoption.

(Ayes 22. Noes 9.) Motion to reconsider made by Senator Wolk. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 31. Noes 0) Location: 6/23/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #84 SENATE SENATE BILLS-THIRD READING FILE Summary: Current law creates the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, which, if


60

SB 927 (Cannella R) Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2014. Current Text: Introduced: 1/29/2014 pdf html Introduced: 1/29/2014 Status: 4/22/2014-Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 6. Page 3211.)

Reconsideration granted. Location: 2/6/2014-S. N.R. & W. Summary: Would rename the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012 as the Safe,

Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2014 and make conforming changes. The bill would instead authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $9,217,000,000 by reducing the amount available for projects related to drought relief and water supply reliability, as specified. The bill would remove the authorization for funds to be available for ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects, and would increase the amount of funds available for emergency and urgent actions to ensure safe drinking water supplies in disadvantaged communities and economically distressed areas.

SB 985 (Pavley D) Stormwater resource planning. Current Text: Amended: 6/24/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/11/2014 Last Amend: 6/24/2014 Status: 6/24/2014-Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/24/2014-A. APPR. Summary: Would require a stormwater resource plan to identify and prioritize stormwater and dry weather

runoff capture projects for implementation in a prescribed quantitative manner and to prioritize the use of lands or easements in public ownership for stormwater and dry weather runoff projects. This bill would eliminate the requirement that a stormwater resource plan be consistent with any applicable integrated regional water management plan.

SB 1036 (Pavley D) Urban water management plans. Current Text: Amended: 5/27/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/18/2014 Last Amend: 5/27/2014 Status: 6/17/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 17).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/17/2014-A. APPR. Summary: Would authorize an urban water supplier to include within an urban water management plan

certain energy-related information, including, but not limited to, an estimate of the amount of energy used to extract or divert water supplies. This bill would require the Department of Water Resources to include in its guidance for the preparation of urban water management plans a methodology for the voluntary calculation or estimation of the energy intensity of urban water systems .

SB 1086 (De León D) The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Rivers, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 5/27/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/19/2014 Last Amend: 5/27/2014 Status: 5/27/2014-Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. Location: 5/27/2014-S. THIRD READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #79 SENATE SENATE BILLS-THIRD READING FILE

Summary: Would enact the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Rivers, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2014,

which, if adopted by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in an unspecified amount pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe neighborhood parks, rivers, and coastal protection program. The bill would provide for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. This bill contains other related provisions.

61

SB 1120 (Galgiani D) Local water supply programs or projects: funding. Current Text: Amended: 5/27/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/19/2014 Last Amend: 5/27/2014 Status: 6/17/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 17).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/17/2014-A. APPR. Summary: Would require the Department of Water Resources to conduct a voluntary statewide survey of

local regional water supply projects and post specified results of the survey on the department' s Internet Web site by July 1, 2015.

SB 1130 (Roth D) Drinking water: County Water Company of Riverside water system: liability. Current Text: Amended: 4/21/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 4/21/2014 Status: 6/26/2014-Hearing postponed by committee. Location: 6/18/2014-A. APPR. Calendar: 7/2/2014 9 a.m. - State Capitol, Room 4202 ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS, GATTO, Chair Summary: Would exempt the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, the Eastern Municipal Water

District, the Western Municipal Water District, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California from liability, as prescribed, for claims by past or existing County Water Company of Riverside customers or those who consumed water provided through the County Water Company of Riverside water system prior to and during the interim operation period, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.

SB 1168 (Pavley D) Groundwater management. Current Text: Amended: 6/17/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 6/17/2014 Status: 6/24/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 24).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/24/2014-A. APPR. Summary: Current law requires the Department of Water Resources to identify the extent of monitoring of

groundwater elevations that is being undertaken within each basin or subbasin and prioritize groundwater basins and subbasins. This bill would require the department, pursuant to these provisions, to categorize each basin and subbasin as either high priority, medium priority, low priority, or very low priority. The bill would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife, in collaboration with the department, to identify those basins and subbasins where species and ecosystems are vulnerable to existing or future groundwater conditions.

SB 1216 (Morrell R) Taxation: homeowners' exemption and renters' credit. Current Text: Amended: 4/8/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014 Last Amend: 4/8/2014 Status: 5/1/2014-Set for hearing May 7. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. Location: 4/22/2014-S. G. & F. Summary: Current property tax law provides, pursuant to the authority of a specified provision of the

California Constitution, for a homeowners' exemption in the amount of $7,000 of the full value of a "dwelling," as defined, and authorizes the Legislature to increase this exemption. This bill, beginning with the lien date for the 2015-16 fiscal year, would increase the homeowners' exemption from $7,000 to $20,000 of the full value of a dwelling.

SB 1250 (Hueso D) Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 5/7/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/20/2014

62

Last Amend: 5/7/2014 Status: 5/13/2014-Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. Location: 5/7/2014-S. N.R. & W. Summary: Current law creates the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, which, if


SB 1292 (Hueso D) Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. Current Text: Introduced: 2/21/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Status: 6/18/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17).

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/18/2014-A. APPR. Calendar: 7/2/2014 9 a.m. - State Capitol, Room 4202 ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS, GATTO, Chair Summary: Would increase the maximum amount of a construction grant award to $5,000,000 for a water

system serving severely disadvantaged communities. By authorizing the increased expenditure of moneys in a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill contains other existing laws.

SB 1370 (Galgiani D) Reliable Water Supply Bond Act of 2014. Current Text: Amended: 3/24/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 3/24/2014 Status: 4/8/2014-Set, first hearing. Heard for testimony only. Location: 4/8/2014-A. NAT. RES. Summary: Current law creates the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, which, if


SB 1390 (Correa D) Santa Ana River Conservancy Program. Current Text: Amended: 6/12/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 6/12/2014 Status: 7/1/2014-From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.)

(June 23). Location: 7/1/2014-A. SECOND READING Calendar: 7/3/2014 #10 ASSEMBLY SENATE SECOND READING FILE Summary: Would establish the Santa Ana River Conservancy Program, to be administered by the State

Coastal Conservancy, to address the resource and recreational goals of the Santa Ana River region. The bill would authorize the conservancy to acquire interests and options in real property and would prescribe the management, powers, and duties of the conservancy for purposes of the program.

SB 1420 (Wolk D) Water management: urban water management plans. Current Text: Amended: 4/21/2014 pdf html Introduced: 2/21/2014 Last Amend: 4/21/2014 Status: 6/17/2014-From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To

consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. Location: 6/17/2014-A. APPR.

63

Summary: Would require an urban water management plan to quantify and report on distribution system

water loss. The bill would authorize water use projections to display and account for the water savings estimated to result from adopted codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans, when that information is available and applicable to an urban water supplier. The bill would require the plan, or amendments to the plan, to be submitted electronically to the Department of Water Resources and include any standardized forms, tables, or displays specified by the department.

64

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCash Transaction Report

Month of May 2014

Below is a summary of cash transactions completed during the month in the Authority's checking account with Citizens Business Bank. Attached are summaries by major revenue and expense classifications.

Cash Receipts and Deposits to Account 1,738,009.88$

Net Investment Transfers -

Cash Disbursements (1,145,177.38)

Net Change for Month 592,832.50$

Balance at Beginning of Month 424,769.85

Balance at End of Month per General Ledger 1,017,602.35$

Collected Balance per Citizens Business Bank 1,066,674.00$

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE RECONCILIATION

Accounts Payable Balance @ 04/30/14 3,801,894.19$

Invoices Received for May 2014 1,626,403.80 Invoices Paid by check/wire during May 2014 (see attached register) (823,311.49)

Accounts Payable Balance @ 05/31/14 4,604,986.50$ .

65

CASH RECEIPTS

Brine Line Operating Revenues 583,519.61$ OCFCD Loan Payment - Subvention Funds 967,064.88 LESJWA Admin Reimbursement 15,284.30 Prop 13,50,84 Grant 171,407.35 Other 733.74

Total Receipts and Deposits 1,738,009.88$

INVESTMENT TRANSFERS

Transfer of Funds: -$ From (to) LAIF - From (to) Grant Retention (CBB) - From (to) CalTRUST (CBB) - From (to) Wealth Management (CBB) -

Total Investment Transfers -$

CASH DISBURSEMENTS

By Check:Payroll 599.33$ Operations 822,458.09

Total Checks Drawn 823,057.42$

By Cash Transfer:Payroll 212,190.70$ Payroll Taxes 102,941.37 Wire Transfer - FIA Card 6,085.66 Account Analysis Fee 48.83 Take Care (AFLAC) 853.40

Total Cash Transfers 322,119.96$

Total Cash Disbursements 1,145,177.38$

66

Category Check # Check Date Type Vendor Check Amount

Account Analysis Fee WDL000003139 05/20/14 WDL CBB 48.83$ Account Analysis Fee Total 48.83$

Benefits 45267 05/02/14 CHK Public Employees' Retirement System 17,615.47$ Benefits 45268 05/02/14 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 99.77$ Benefits 45270 05/02/14 CHK State Compensation Ins Fund 4,490.08$ Benefits 45277 05/02/14 CHK WageWorks 54.00$ Benefits 45287 05/16/14 CHK ACWA/JPIA 35,503.54$ Benefits 45288 05/16/14 CHK AFLAC 242.31$ Benefits 45293 05/16/14 CHK Public Employees' Retirement System 18,109.89$ Benefits 45295 05/16/14 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 99.77$ Benefits 45305 05/16/14 CHK WageWorks 54.00$ Benefits 45320 05/22/14 CHK Mutual Of Omaha 4,202.42$ Benefits 45322 05/30/14 CHK Public Employees' Retirement System 18,109.89$ Benefits 45323 05/30/14 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 99.77$ Benefits EFT000794 05/02/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 6,105.16$ Benefits EFT000802 05/02/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 375.52$ Benefits EFT000818 05/15/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 6,105.16$ Benefits EFT000823 05/15/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 375.52$ Benefits EFT000841 05/30/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 6,205.16$ Benefits EFT000844 05/30/14 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 375.52$ Benefits WDL000003131 05/06/14 WDL Takecare 583.40$ Benefits WDL000003132 05/07/14 WDL Takecare 270.00$

Benefits Total 119,076.35$

Car Repair/Maint 45303 05/16/14 CHK Southern California Fleet Services Inc 3,458.70$ Car Repair/Maint EFT000812 05/08/14 CHK Capital One Commercial- 7003 1,000.00$

Car Repair/Maint Total 4,458.70$

Charge Card P024367 05/02/14 WDL FIA Card Services 6,085.66$ Charge Card Total 6,085.66$

Computers EFT000808 05/02/14 CHK Hardronex, Inc. 607.00$ Computers Total 607.00$

Construction 45306 05/16/14 CHK Dudek 38,432.75$ Construction 45319 05/22/14 CHK Dudek 34,528.00$ Construction EFT000837 05/22/14 CHK MMC, Inc. 12,205.98$ Construction EFT000845 05/30/14 CHK MMC, Inc. 14,991.96$

Construction Total 100,158.69$

Consulting 45284 05/08/14 CHK Accent Computer Solutions Inc 1,020.00$ Consulting 45285 05/08/14 CHK Statistical Research, Inc. 10,423.95$ Consulting 45296 05/16/14 CHK The Dolphin Group 11,500.00$ Consulting 45308 05/16/14 CHK Parsons Environment & Infrastructure Grp Inc 7,281.00$ Consulting 45313 05/22/14 CHK Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 36,611.82$ Consulting 45316 05/22/14 CHK Accent Computer Solutions Inc 357.50$ Consulting 45327 05/30/14 CHK enfoTech 3,901.50$ Consulting EFT000795 05/02/14 CHK Risk Sciences 5,241.63$ Consulting EFT000801 05/02/14 CHK CDM Smith, Inc. 7,274.86$ Consulting EFT000805 05/02/14 CHK Integrated Systems Solutions 1,023.00$ Consulting EFT000807 05/02/14 CHK Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 3,750.10$ Consulting EFT000816 05/08/14 CHK URS Corporation 6,375.98$ Consulting EFT000819 05/15/14 CHK Risk Sciences 7,360.14$ Consulting EFT000835 05/22/14 CHK CDM Smith, Inc. 15,822.45$ Consulting EFT000836 05/22/14 CHK Yeager Environmental LLC 2,870.00$ Consulting EFT000839 05/22/14 CHK Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 4,133.25$

Consulting Total 124,947.18$

Contract Services 45290 05/16/14 CHK Orange County Water District 25,550.00$ Contract Services Total 25,550.00$

Contributions 45297 05/16/14 CHK Municipal Water District of Orange County 1,600.00$ Contributions Total 1,600.00$

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCheck Detail

May 2014

Page 1 of 4

67



May 2014

Debt Services EFT000831 05/22/14 CHK Western Riverside County Regional 217,193.94$ Debt Services Total 217,193.94$

Director EFT000791 05/02/14 CHK Inland Empire Utilities Agency 358.86$ Director EFT000792 05/02/14 CHK Philip Anthony 103.04$ Director EFT000793 05/02/14 CHK Eastern Municipal Water District 193.99$ Director EFT000796 05/02/14 CHK Western Municipal Water District 391.34$ Director EFT000798 05/02/14 CHK Ed Killgore 44.80$ Director EFT000800 05/02/14 CHK Thomas P Evans 3.70$ Director EFT000803 05/02/14 CHK Mark Bulot 59.36$ Director EFT000809 05/02/14 CHK Harish S Sidhu 44.80$ Director EFT000810 05/02/14 CHK Jasmin Hall 58.24$

Director Total 1,258.13$

Employee Reimbursement EFT000804 05/02/14 CHK Karen Williams 79.18$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000811 05/02/14 CHK Lucas Gilbert 2,500.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000817 05/08/14 CHK Zachary Snyder 14.11$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000821 05/15/14 CHK David Ruhl 51.52$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000824 05/15/14 CHK Patti Bonawitz 125.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000825 05/15/14 CHK Dawna Munson 165.26$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000826 05/15/14 CHK Carlos Quintero 52.08$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000828 05/15/14 CHK Jim Gusman 970.09$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000829 05/15/14 CHK Lucas Gilbert 47.04$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000834 05/22/14 CHK Celeste Cantu 100.49$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000840 05/22/14 CHK Matt Stewart 240.80$ Employee Reimbursement EFT000822 05/15/14 CHK Celeste Cantu 14.00$

Employee Reimbursement Total 4,359.57$

Employment Recruitment 45317 05/22/14 CHK Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc 65.00$ Employment Recruitment Total 65.00$

Equipment - Asset 45309 05/16/14 CHK RJ Safety 6,423.37$ Equipment - Asset Total 6,423.37$

Equipment Expensed EFT000814 05/08/14 CHK G/M Business Interiors 826.34$ Equipment Expensed Total 826.34$

Equipment Rented 45265 05/02/14 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 1,143.22$ Equipment Rented 45276 05/02/14 CHK NEC Financial Services LLC 1,343.85$ Equipment Rented 45325 05/30/14 CHK NEC Financial Services LLC 1,343.85$

Equipment Rented Total 3,830.92$

Facility Repair/Maint 45271 05/02/14 CHK Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 72.65$ Facility Repair/Maint 45275 05/02/14 CHK Redlands Plumbing Heating & Air Conditioning 110.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 45283 05/08/14 CHK Elevator Support Services Inc 203.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 45300 05/16/14 CHK Gold Coast Environmental 1,000.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 45301 05/16/14 CHK United Storm Water Inc. 2,232.40$ Facility Repair/Maint 45304 05/16/14 CHK RKM Heating and Air Conditioning 9,584.81$ Facility Repair/Maint 45315 05/22/14 CHK United Storm Water Inc. 722.40$ Facility Repair/Maint 45318 05/22/14 CHK Trench Shoring, Inc. 470.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 45324 05/30/14 CHK Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 72.65$ Facility Repair/Maint 45326 05/30/14 CHK Republic Services 803.95$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000797 05/02/14 CHK Yeier Janitorial Service 1,120.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000799 05/02/14 CHK Green Meadows Landscape 575.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000806 05/02/14 CHK A Cone Zone Inc 86.40$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000820 05/15/14 CHK Western Exterminator Co. 92.50$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000827 05/15/14 CHK MMC, Inc. 6,108.48$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000832 05/22/14 CHK Haz Mat Trans, Inc. 432.50$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000843 05/30/14 CHK Yeier Janitorial Service 1,120.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT000846 05/30/14 CHK Green Meadows Landscape 800.00$

Facility Repair/Maint Total 25,606.74$

Lab Costs 45273 05/02/14 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 2,160.00$ Lab Costs 45298 05/16/14 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 526.00$ Lab Costs 45314 05/22/14 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 232.00$

Page 2 of 4

68



May 2014

Lab Costs Total 2,918.00$

Legal Expense 45282 05/08/14 CHK Tornell & Cotten Professional Court Reporters 3,539.70$ Legal Expense 45307 05/16/14 CHK Murphy & Evertz 1,718.75$

Legal Expense Total 5,258.45$

Meeting Expense EFT000842 05/30/14 CHK Water Education Foundation 70.00$ Meeting Expense Total 70.00$

Office Expense 45261 05/02/14 CHK Aramark Corporation Refreshment Services 136.10$ Office Expense 45264 05/02/14 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 426.29$ Office Expense 45272 05/02/14 CHK Awards & Specialties 34.56$ Office Expense 45274 05/02/14 CHK Printing Connection, Inc. 43.20$ Office Expense 45281 05/08/14 CHK Staples Business Advantage 59.94$ Office Expense 45291 05/16/14 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 489.47$ Office Expense 45310 05/22/14 CHK Aramark Corporation Refreshment Services 69.00$ Office Expense EFT000812 05/08/14 CHK Capital One Commercial- 7003 347.40$

Office Expense Total 1,605.96$

Offsite Storage EFT000815 05/08/14 CHK Iron Mountain 208.37$ Offsite Storage Total 208.37$

Payroll 45286 05/16/14 CHK Payroll Check 269.48$ Payroll 45321 05/30/14 CHK Payroll Check 73.08$ Payroll 45260 05/02/14 CHK Payroll Check 256.77$

Payroll Total 599.33$

Payroll/Taxes WDL000003127 05/02/14 WDL Direct Deposit 5/2/2014 65,700.44$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003128 05/02/14 WDL PR Tax - Federal 26,285.98$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003129 05/02/14 WDL PR Tax - State 5,465.61$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003133 05/16/14 WDL Direct Deposit 5/16/2014 67,385.59$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003134 05/16/14 WDL PR Tax - Federal 27,603.71$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003135 05/16/14 WDL PR Tax - State 5,877.72$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003142 05/30/14 WDL Direct Deposit 5/30/2014 66,255.69$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003143 05/30/14 WDL Direct Deposit 5/30/2014 12,848.98$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003144 05/30/14 WDL PR Tax - Federal 30,912.21$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003145 05/30/14 WDL PR Tax - State 6,796.14$

Payroll/Taxes Total 315,132.07$

Permit Fees 45299 05/16/14 CHK City of Chino 113.42$ Permit Fees Total 113.42$

Prepaid Expense 45302 05/16/14 CHK Innovyze, Inc. 1,200.00$ Prepaid Expense Total 1,200.00$

Prop 84 EFT000830 05/22/14 CHK Orange County Sanitation District 50,485.30$ Prop 84 EFT000833 05/22/14 CHK Santa Ana Watershed Association 112,657.83$

Prop 84 Total 163,143.13$

Safety 45309 05/16/14 CHK RJ Safety 3,812.14$ Safety 45317 05/22/14 CHK Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc 105.00$ Safety EFT000813 05/08/14 CHK Underground Service Alert 292.50$

Safety Total 4,209.64$

Shipping/Postage 45279 05/08/14 CHK Overnite Shipping 10.41$ Shipping/Postage 45289 05/16/14 CHK Overnite Shipping 20.82$ Shipping/Postage 45294 05/16/14 CHK Pitney Bowes Purchase Power 1,175.51$ Shipping/Postage 45312 05/22/14 CHK United Parcel Service 45.00$

Shipping/Postage Total 1,251.74$

Subscriptions 45292 05/16/14 CHK The Press Enterprise 285.84$ Subscriptions Total 285.84$

Utilities 45262 05/02/14 CHK Riverside, City of 2,361.23$ Utilities 45263 05/02/14 CHK Verizon Wireless 1,207.72$ Utilities 45266 05/02/14 CHK AT&T 143.63$

Page 3 of 4

69



May 2014

Utilities 45269 05/02/14 CHK Southern California Edison 28.94$ Utilities 45278 05/02/14 CHK Verizon Wireless 309.00$ Utilities 45280 05/08/14 CHK Southern California Edison 225.96$ Utilities 45311 05/22/14 CHK AT&T 103.42$ Utilities EFT000838 05/22/14 CHK tw telecom 2,705.11$

Utilities Total 7,085.01$

Accounts Payable 1,145,177.38$

Checks 822,458.09$ Wire Transfers 6,085.66$

828,543.75$

Bank Fees 48.83$

Take Care 853.40$ Payroll 315,731.40$

316,584.80$

Total Disbursements May 2014 1,145,177.38$

Page 4 of 4

70

Remaining

Check # Check Date Task # Task Description Vendor Name Total Contract Check Amount Contract Amount Notes/Comments

45284 05/08/14 ACS100-05 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 25,000.00$ 868.00$ 2,924.51$ 45284 05/08/14 ACS100-05 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 25,000.00$ 152.00$ 2,924.51$ 45316 05/22/14 ACS100-05 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 25,000.00$ 357.50$ 2,924.51$

EFT000801 05/02/14 CDM384-12 MSAR TMDL Support CDM Smith, Inc. 158,395.00$ 7,274.86$ 83,532.57$ EFT000835 05/22/14 CDM384-12 MSAR TMDL Support CDM Smith, Inc. 158,395.00$ 15,822.45$ 83,532.57$

EFT000807 05/02/14 SKR392-02 EC PR Blog Support Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 36,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 9,574.13$ EFT000807 05/02/14 SKR392-02 EC PR Blog Support Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 36,000.00$ 50.10$ 9,574.13$ EFT000807 05/02/14 SKR373-01 Social Media & Outreach Program Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 20,350.00$ 1,200.00$ 5,825.00$ EFT000839 05/22/14 SKR392-02 EC PR Blog Support Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 36,000.00$ 2,800.00$ 9,574.13$ EFT000839 05/22/14 SKR392-02 EC PR Blog Support Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 36,000.00$ 183.25$ 9,574.13$ EFT000839 05/22/14 SKR373-01 Social Media & Outreach Program Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 20,350.00$ 1,150.00$ 5,825.00$

45327 05/30/14 ENFO240-01 Data Management System enfoTech 229,085.00$ 3,901.50$ 31,458.04$

EFT000805 05/02/14 INSOL100-05 GP Software - Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 7,500.00$ 577.50$ 1,369.50$ EFT000805 05/02/14 INSOL100-05 GP Software - Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 7,500.00$ 198.00$ 1,369.50$ EFT000805 05/02/14 INSOL100-05 GP Software - Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 7,500.00$ 33.00$ 1,369.50$ EFT000805 05/02/14 INSOL100-05 GP Software - Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 7,500.00$ 214.50$ 1,369.50$

45308 05/16/14 PAR373-01 OWOW Program Evaluation Parsons Environment & Infrastructure Grp Inc 50,000.00$ 7,281.00$ 30,631.45$

EFT000795 05/02/14 RISK392-04 EC Workgroup FY13-14 Risk Sciences 14,880.00$ 5,241.63$ 85.36$ EFT000819 05/15/14 RISK384-07 MSAR TMDL Task Force Risk Sciences 44,080.00$ 5,105.07$ 27,197.40$ EFT000819 05/15/14 RISK374-04 Support Basin Monitoring Program TF Risk Sciences 49,950.00$ 2,255.07$ 40,557.91$

45285 05/08/14 SRI326-01 Section 106 Report - Reach V Repairs Statistical Research, Inc. 13,874.92$ 10,423.95$ 33.52$

45296 05/16/14 TDGI10000-16 Legislative & Government Relations Consulting The Dolphin Group 115,000.00$ 11,500.00$ 13,500.00$

EFT000816 05/08/14 URS326-01 VE Workshop URS Corporation 6,638.00$ 6,375.98$ 262.02$

45313 05/22/14 WILD374-07 Recomputation of Ambient Water Quality Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 347,266.96$ 35,099.82$ 51,839.54$ 45313 05/22/14 WILD374-08 Addendum - 2008 SAR Wasteland Allocation Model Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 80,000.00$ 1,512.00$ 60,425.25$

EFT000836 05/22/14 YEAG373-03 OWOW 2.0 Support Services Yeager Environmental LLC 24,740.00$ 2,870.00$ 15,080.00$

124,947.18$

May 2014

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityConsulting

71


72

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8913 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Inter-Fund Borrowing – May 2014 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file the informational report on short-term, cash-flow inter-fund borrowing. DISCUSSION On December 13, 2005, the Commission approved Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. Staff was directed to bring back an accounting of the loans each month for review when the total exceeded $250,000 in aggregate. The following projects, with negative cash flow, are listed below with the amounts borrowed from SAWPA General Fund Reserves in May 2014. The total amount borrowed is over the aggregate $250,000 amount recommended in Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. The Commission has requested that this item be brought back each month as an informational item when the loan amount is under the $250,000 aggregate amount. Fund Fund Name 04/30/14

Balance Loan

Receipts New

Charges 05/31/14 Balance

130 Proposition 84 Admin $92,665.66 ($8,264.22) $3,029.36 $87,430.80 373 Watershed Mgmt Plan 214,836.00 (0.00) 28,426.56 243,262.56 477 LESJWA Administration 13,922.36 (15,284.30) 9,554.48 8,192.54 Total Funds Borrowed $321,424.02 ($23,548.52) $41,010.40 $338,885.90 General Fund Reserves Balance $1,788,170.39 Less Amount Borrowed (338,885.90) Balance of General Fund Reserves $1,449,284.49 The following table lists each fund that has a negative cash flow, the source of funding for the fund, how often the fund is billed, and the projected rate of payment for the fund.

NEGATIVE CASH-FLOW FUNDS

Fund No. Source of Funding Billing Frequency

Projected Payment Time

125/130 – Proposition 50/84 Admin SWRCB/DWR – Prop 50/84 Grant Quarterly Up to 6 months 373 – Watershed Management Plan (OWOW) DWR – Prop 84 Planning Grant Quarterly Up to 6 months 477 – LESJWA Admin Reimbursement from LESJWA Monthly 2 to 4 weeks

73

CM#8913 July 15, 2014 Page 2 Fund 125/130 There is $50,000 in retention funds due from the SWRCB for the administration of Proposition 50. These funds have been billed to the SWRCB and should be received by June 30, 2014. There is an outstanding invoice for $14,569 due for the administration of Proposition 84. This invoice is for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The balance of the funds due from DWR is the mandatory 10% retention from each invoice billed. Retention funds will not be released until the Proposition 84 Round I contract is completed in 2017. Fund 373 This fund received a Proposition 84 planning grant from DWR. The balance of the funds due from DWR is the mandatory 10% retention from each invoice billed. This grant is complete and needs to be signed off by DWR before the retention funds can be released. Fund 477 Each month LESJWA is billed the cost for administering the JPA. Once the bill is received, LESJWA submits payment within two weeks. The following graph shows projected inter-fund loan balances, total unrestricted General Fund Reserves available for loans, and projected cash net of loans through July 2014. The projected loan balance is expected to remain within the $250,000 aggregate limit through July 2014, and can be covered by General Fund Reserves without a major impact on cash flow.

RESOURCE IMPACTS The funds borrowed from the General Fund Reserves will be paid back with interest when the grant funding is received. Budgeted expenditures from the General Fund and proposed borrowings are not expected to have an impact on the General Fund Reserves balance. KW:kb CM 8913 Interfund Borrowing May’14 7-15-14

‐

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Jul‐1

3

Aug‐13

Sep‐13

Oct‐13

Nov‐13

Dec‐13

Jan‐14

Feb‐14

Mar‐14

Apr‐14

May‐14

Jun‐14

Thousands

Projected General Cash / Reserves Fund Balance

Unrestricted Reserve Funds Interfund Loans

$250,000 Projected Cash Net of Loans

74

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8914 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Performance Indicators and Financial Reporting – May 2014 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file staff’s report. DISCUSSION The attached reports have been developed to keep the Commission informed as to SAWPA’s business and budget performance. These reports are categorized into the following groups: financial reporting, cash and investments, and performance indicators. They are explained in detail below. As new reports are developed, they will be added for the Commission’s review. Financial Reporting

Balance Sheet by Fund Type Lists total assets, liabilities, and equity by fund type for a given period.

Revenue & Expense by Fund Type Lists total revenue and expenses by fund type for a given period.

Receivables Management Shows total outstanding accounts receivable by age.

Open Task Order Schedule Shows SAWPA’s total outstanding obligation for open task orders.

Debt Service Funding Analysis Shows total annual income by source used to make debt service payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Debt Service Payment Schedule Shows total debt service interest and principal payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Cash and Investments

Total Cash and Investments (chart) Shows the changes in cash and investments for the fiscal year.

Reserve Balance & Source of Funds Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the types of investments held for each fund.

Cash & Investments (pie chart) Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the percentage of each investment type.

Reserve Account Analysis Shows changes to each reserve account for the year and projected ending balance for each.

Twelve Month Security Schedule (chart)

Shows the maturity dates for securities held and percentage of securities in each category.

Treasurer’s Report Shows book and market value for both Treasury strips and securities held by the Agency.

75

CM#8914 July 15, 2014 Page 2 Performance Indicators

Average Daily Flow by Month

Shows total flow in the SARI System by month compared to total treatment capacity owned. This is an indicator of the available capacity in the line. As we add yearly flows, it will show trends in flow throughout the year.

Summary of Labor Multipliers Summarizes the information generated from the following two reports and compares the actual benefit and G&A Allocation rates to the total budgeted rates.

General Fund Costs Lists total Fund No. 100 costs to date and the amount of those costs recovered through the G&A Allocation and member contributions.

Benefit Summary Lists total employee benefit costs actual to budget and projects them through the end of the year. This report compares how the actual benefit rate compares to the budgeted rate.

Labor Hours Budget vs. Actual Shows total budgeted hours for each project and compares them to the actual hours charged to each.

RESOURCE IMPACTS Staff expects minimal impacts to SAWPA or its member agencies related to this effort. KW:kb

Attachments: 1. Balance Sheet by Fund Type 9. Reserve Account Analysis 2. Revenue & Expense by Fund Type 10. Twelve-Month Maturity Schedule - Securities 3. Accounts Receivable Aging Report 11. Treasurer’s Report 4. Open Task Order Schedule 12. Average Daily Flow by Month 5. Debt Service Funding Analysis 13. Summary of Labor Multipliers 6. Debt Service Payment Schedule 14. General Fund Costs 7. Total Cash and Investments (chart) 15. Benefits 8. Reserve Balance & Source of Funds 16. Labor Hours Budgeted vs. Actual CM 8914 Perform Indicators 7-15-14

76

CapitalProjects

Grants/Contracts Planning

CollaborativeProjects

SAWPAGeneral

Brine LineEnterprise

FundTotals

Assets

Current AssetsCash and Investments ($835,886.24) $358,640.84 ($22,984.43) $1,958,679.21 $2,613,519.84 $51,424,969.44 $55,496,938.66Accounts Receivable 0.00 2,056,905.71 117,340.37 (4,648.00) 23,450.71 1,488,112.40 3,681,161.19Installment Notes Receivable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,367,158.78 11,367,158.78Interest Receivable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,171.32 68,171.32Prepaids and Deposits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,806.41 90,211.54 102,017.95

Total Current Assets (835,886.24) 2,415,546.55 94,355.94 1,954,031.21 2,648,776.96 64,438,623.48 70,715,447.90

Fixed AssetsProperty, Plant & Equipment

less accum depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,246,529.76 72,765,880.37 74,012,410.13Work In Process 596,721.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 596,721.91

Total fixed assets 596,721.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,246,529.76 72,765,880.37 74,609,132.04

Other AssetsWastewater treatment/disposal

rights, net of amortization 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,590.73 33,377,496.27 33,389,087.00Inventory - Mitigation Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,934,560.00 0.00 0.00 1,934,560.00

Total Other Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,934,560.00 11,590.73 33,377,496.27 35,323,647.00

Total Assets ($239,164.33) $2,415,546.55 $94,355.94 $3,888,591.21 $3,906,897.45 $170,582,000.12 $180,648,226.94Liabilities and Fund EquityCurrent Liabilities

Accounts Payable/Accrued Expenses $118,435.34 $1,963,100.38 $12,777.17 $103,394.25 $551,863.74 $888,942.26 $3,638,513.14Accrued Interest Payable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 253,055.20 253,055.20Customer Deposits 0.00 442,136.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 442,136.60

Noncurrent LiabilitiesLong-term Debt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,316,852.03 29,316,852.03Contributions in Aid - Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (22,253.20) (22,253.20)Deferred Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,759,903.50 82,759,903.50Total Liabilities 118,435.34 2,405,236.98 12,777.17 103,394.25 551,863.74 113,196,499.79 116,388,207.27

Fund EquityContributed Capital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,920,507.03 20,920,507.03Retained Earnings 211,738.04 27,548.14 93,366.12 3,894,173.85 2,793,279.92 39,437,362.13 46,457,468.20Revenue Over/Under Expenditures (569,337.71) (17,238.57) (11,787.35) (108,976.89) 561,753.79 (2,972,368.83) (3,117,955.56)

Total Fund Equity (357,599.67) 10,309.57 81,578.77 3,785,196.96 3,355,033.71 57,385,500.33 64,260,019.67

Total Liabilities & Fund Equity ($239,164.33) $2,415,546.55 $94,355.94 $3,888,591.21 $3,906,897.45 $170,582,000.12 $180,648,226.94

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityBalance Sheet by Fund Type

For the Ten Months Ending Wednesday, April 30, 2014

77

CapitalProjects

Grants/Contracts Planning

CollaborativeProjects

SAWPAGeneral

Brine LineEnterprise

FundTotals

Operating RevenueDischarge Fees $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,108,683.75 $7,108,683.75Grant Proceeds 0.00 3,081,191.25 164,467.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,245,658.48Financing Proceeds 0.00 133,272.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133,272.79

Total Operating Revenue 0.00 3,214,464.04 164,467.23 0.00 0.00 7,108,683.75 10,487,615.02

Operating ExpensesLabor 29,182.74 80,106.39 241,734.83 46,073.66 1,124,625.70 679,523.71 2,201,247.03Benefits 12,986.32 35,644.17 107,571.99 20,502.78 384,368.10 302,388.06 863,461.42G&A Allocation 46,196.28 126,797.03 382,666.23 72,934.61 11.40 1,075,686.03 1,704,291.58Education & Training 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,522.31 624.00 6,146.31Consulting & Professional Services 114,035.85 38.59 71,841.96 668,546.67 173,021.76 955,945.60 1,983,430.43Operating Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 641.06 1,829,966.37 1,830,607.43Repair & Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,354.01 656,667.23 699,021.24Phone & Utilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,483.00 5,741.81 58,224.81Equipment & Computers 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 125,126.79 8,666.74 143,793.53Meeting & Travel 296.30 712.34 8,570.54 1,835.16 23,955.67 4,151.36 39,521.37Other Administrative Costs 540.96 10,100.67 12,704.48 0.00 75,164.96 27,477.71 125,988.78Benefits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (57,209.97) 0.00 (57,209.97)G&A Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1,768,636.89) 0.00 (1,768,636.89)Other Expenses 366,099.26 0.00 0.00 23,706.00 27,707.99 141,898.60 559,411.85Construction 0.00 2,988,303.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,988,303.42

Total Operating Expenses 569,337.71 3,241,702.61 835,090.03 833,598.88 209,135.89 5,688,737.22 11,377,602.34

Operating Income (Loss) (569,337.71) (27,238.57) (670,622.80) (833,598.88) (209,135.89) 1,419,946.53 (889,987.32)

Nonoperating Income (Expense)Member Contributions 0.00 10,000.00 658,000.00 164,752.00 923,835.00 0.00 1,756,587.00Other Agency Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 536,027.00 0.00 0.00 536,027.00Interest Income 0.00 0.00 835.45 6,471.87 6,792.33 133,798.68 147,898.33Interest Expense - Debt Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (812,683.29) (812,683.29)Other Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 407.52 15,079.86 15,837.38Use of Reserves 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (108,370.66) 0.00 (108,370.66)Gain/Loss on Disposal/Sale of Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,021.12 0.00 0.00 17,021.12

Total Nonoperating Income (Expense) 0.00 10,000.00 658,835.45 724,621.99 822,664.19 (663,804.75) 1,552,316.88

Excess Rev over (under) Exp ($569,337.71) ($17,238.57) ($11,787.35) ($108,976.89) $613,528.30 $756,141.78 $662,329.56


For the Ten Months Ending Wednesday, April 30, 2014

78

Aging ReportSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority

Receivables as of June 27, 2014

Customer Name Project Total Current 0-30 Days 31-60 Days 61 and Over

Chino Basin Desalter Authority Brine Line 133,159.55 133,159.55 Department of Water Resources OWOW Grant, Prop 84 461,346.49 461,346.49 DR Horton Brine Line 493.72 493.72 Eastern Municipal Water District Brine Line 138,187.94 138,187.94 Inland Empire Utilities Agency Brine Line 264,285.44 136,720.42 127,565.02 Orange County Water District Member Agency Contributions 23,000.00 23,000.00 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Brine Line 122,736.27 62,463.53 60,272.74 Western Municipal Water District Brine Line 284,867.02 284,867.02

Total Accounts Receivable 1,428,076.43 - 622,238.91 187,837.76 484,840.21

79


80

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts

WO#2014-35 1699 A Cone Zone Traffic Control Support 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1,500.00$ -$ 1,500.00$ 602.71$ 897.29$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-50 1699 A Cone Zone Potholing - Traffic Control Support 4/2/2014 2/24/2014 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ 1,964.65$ 35.35$ Carlos Quintero

CALV240-02 1872 Calvada Surveying Inc Brine Line On-call Land Surveying Services 6/27/2012 6/30/2014 30,170.00$ -$ 30,170.00$ 912.00$ 29,258.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-22 1503 Camet Research Laboratory Analysis 7/3/2013 6/30/2014 3,500.00$ -$ 3,500.00$ 2,625.00$ 875.00$ Rich Haller

CDM384-11 1575 CDM Smith Tech Support to Implement CBRP 7/8/2013 6/30/2014 69,854.00$ 17,112.00$ 86,966.00$ 83,192.02$ 3,773.98$ Rick Whetsel

CDM384-12 1575 CDM Smith MSAR TMDL Support 7/3/2013 6/30/2015 158,395.00$ -$ 158,395.00$ 74,862.43$ 83,532.57$ Rick Whetsel

CDM386-09 1575 CDM Smith Additional Support for BPA 6/20/2013 11/30/2013 29,578.00$ -$ 29,578.00$ 29,557.56$ 20.44$ Larry McKenney

CDM386-10 1575 CDM Smith Additional Support for BPA Adoption Process 7/23/2013 3/30/2014 47,031.00$ -$ 47,031.00$ 42,901.87$ 4,129.13$ Larry McKenney

WO#2014-64 2032 Douglas Environmental Group JCSD Hamner Flow Meter Replacement 6/2/2014 6/30/2014 4,813.84$ -$ 4,813.84$ -$ 4,813.84$ Carlos Quintero

DUDK240-01 1969 Dudek Pretreatment Program- OCSD Audit Response 11/30/2012 6/30/2013 20,000.00$ -$ 20,000.00$ 17,575.37$ 2,424.63$ Rich Haller

DUDK240-02 1969 Dudek Pretreatment Program- Evaluation 1/18/2013 12/31/2013 60,000.00$ -$ 60,000.00$ 58,912.62$ 1,087.38$ Rich Haller

DUDK240-03 1969 Dudek Pretreatment Program- Evaluation 8/29/2013 12/31/2013 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 840.00$ 9,160.00$ Rich Haller

DUDK326-01 1969 Dudek BL Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement 9/27/2013 12/31/2014 381,218.00$ -$ 381,218.00$ 217,141.72$ 164,076.28$ David Ruhl

WO#2014-06 1404 E S Babcock Inc Wastewater Sample Collection and Analysis 6/27/2013 6/30/2014 34,531.00$ -$ 34,531.00$ 23,367.00$ 11,164.00$ Carlos Quintero

ENFO240-01 2002 enfoTech Data Management System 8/15/2013 6/30/2014 229,085.00$ -$ 229,085.00$ 197,626.96$ 31,458.04$ Carlos Quintero

EOA240-01 1999 EOA Inc (Eisenberg Olivieri & Associates) Remedial Plan Implementation 8/5/2013 3/30/2014 45,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 66,128.74$ 8,871.26$ Rich Haller

G&G240-13 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc Brine Line System O & M- Permitting & Pretreatment Program 6/25/2012 6/30/2013 77,090.00$ -$ 77,090.00$ 39,132.93$ 37,957.07$ Rich Haller

GCE240-01 1599 Gold Coast Environmental Facility Repair/Maintenance- Meter 10/1/2012 6/30/2014 38,432.00$ -$ 38,432.00$ 37,282.00$ 1,150.00$ Carlos Quintero

HAZ240-04 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc Brine Line On-Call Cleaning Services 6/27/2012 6/30/2014 71,280.00$ -$ 71,280.00$ 48,560.10$ 22,719.90$ Carlos Quintero

HAZ240-05 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc On-Call Draining & Cleaning Emergency Clean-Up Services 6/27/2012 6/30/2014 82,718.00$ -$ 82,718.00$ 44,074.15$ 38,643.85$ Carlos Quintero

HDR320-03-01 1280 HDR Engineering Inc Upper Reach IV-A 7/25/2012 6/30/2013 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 9,960.81$ 15,039.19$ David Ruhl

HDR320-03-02 1280 HDR Engineering Inc Upper Reach IV-A 4/24/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 15,372.38$ 9,627.62$ David Ruhl

HOFF240-03 1654 Hoffman Southwest Corporation Brine Line On-Call Line Cleaning Services 8/16/2012 6/30/2014 180,846.00$ -$ 180,846.00$ 174,174.31$ 6,671.69$ Carlos Quintero

HOFF240-04 1654 Hoffman Southwest Corporation Brine Line On-Call Line CCTV Inspection Services 8/16/2012 6/30/2014 68,250.00$ -$ 68,250.00$ 25,624.96$ 42,625.04$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-19 1450 Innerline Engineering Line Cleaning- 4B Upper 7/15/2013 6/30/2014 234,700.00$ 130,000.00$ 364,700.00$ 358,166.55$ 6,533.45$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-20 1450 Innerline Engineering On Call Cleaning Services 7/15/2013 6/30/2014 106,580.00$ -$ 106,580.00$ 31,653.25$ 74,926.75$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-21 1450 Innerline Engineering Pepperweed Restoration Site- Irrigation 7/23/2013 8/25/2013 3,500.00$ -$ 3,500.00$ 660.00$ 2,840.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-27 1450 Innerline Engineering Pepperweed Restoration Site- Irrigation 8/10/2013 10/31/2013 3,300.00$ -$ 3,300.00$ 2,640.00$ 660.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-39 1354 Jamison Engineering Contractors Inc AV-0250 Repairs 12/3/2013 12/31/2013 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 5,612.82$ 4,387.18$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-41 1354 Jamison Engineering Contractors Inc 4A/4B Warranty CCTV Report 12/20/2013 6/30/2014 35,000.00$ -$ 35,000.00$ 27,536.46$ 7,463.54$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-45 1354 Jamison Engineering Contractors Inc 4B Upper Line Cleaning Support 1/23/2014 3/21/2014 20,000.00$ -$ 20,000.00$ 17,892.64$ 2,107.36$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-55 1354 Jamison Engineering Contractors Inc Line Cleaning Support 3/31/2014 6/30/2014 10,000.00$ 9,155.33$ 19,155.33$ 19,155.33$ -$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-60 1354 Jamison Engineering Contractors Inc CCTV Support 4/16/2014 6/30/2014 12,000.00$ -$ 12,000.00$ -$ 12,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

K&SI320-03-02 1119 Krieger & Stewart BL Relocation & Protection Plan 9/9/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 56,590.86$ 3,409.14$ David Ruhl

K&SI320-03-03 1119 Krieger & Stewart Brine Line Protection Plan 2/28/2014 6/30/2014 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 20,000.00$ -$ 20,000.00$ David Ruhl

Construction 1906 MMC Inc BL Reach IV-B Maintenance Access Structure Phase 3 12/17/2013 4/10/2014 251,548.50$ 48,290.72$ 299,839.22$ 299,839.22$ -$ Carlos Quintero

NATU240-01 1873 Nature's Image Inc Brine Line Right of Way Maintenance 10/11/2012 6/30/2014 27,936.00$ -$ 27,936.00$ 19,748.00$ 8,188.00$ Carlos Quintero

NPA240-01 2010 New Pipe Construction 4A Upper MAS Corrosion Protection 5/5/2014 8/31/2014 41,617.00$ -$ 41,617.00$ -$ 41,617.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-48 1142 Orange County Water District TMDL Lab Support 2/25/2014 6/30/2014 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ 25,550.00$ 4,450.00$ Rick Whetsel

PARS373-01 2013 Parsons Environmental & Infrastructure Group Inc OWOW Program Evaluation 1/3/2014 6/30/2014 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ 19,368.55$ 30,631.45$ Mark Norton

WO#2014-18 1996 Project Partners Permitting and Pretreatment 7/3/2013 12/31/2013 38,000.00$ -$ 38,000.00$ 30,450.00$ 7,550.00$ Rich Haller


As of May 2014Open Task Orders Schedule

81

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts


As of May 2014Open Task Orders Schedule

RBF323-09 1539 RBF Consulting Repairs to Unlined RCP Reaches IV-A & IV-B Engineering Svcs 4/28/2011 6/30/2013 135,300.00$ -$ 135,300.00$ 121,001.87$ 14,298.13$ David Ruhl

RISK374-04 1174 Risk Sciences Support Basin Monitoring Program TF 10/16/2013 6/30/2014 49,950.00$ -$ 49,950.00$ 9,392.09$ 40,557.91$ Mark Norton

RISK384-07 1174 Risk Sciences MSAR TMDL Task Force 6/25/2013 6/30/2015 44,080.00$ -$ 44,080.00$ 16,882.60$ 27,197.40$ Rick Whetsel

RISK386-09 1174 Risk Sciences Additional Technical Support for BPA 6/25/2013 6/30/2014 37,900.00$ -$ 37,900.00$ 36,640.56$ 1,259.44$ Larry McKenney

RISK392-04 1174 Risk Sciences EC Workgroup FY13-14 12/18/2013 6/30/2014 14,880.00$ -$ 14,880.00$ 14,794.64$ 85.36$ Mark Norton

RMC326-01 1980 RMC Water & Environment Compaction Testing 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 100,000.00$ -$ 100,000.00$ 98,435.51$ 1,564.49$ David Ruhl

SAWA323-01 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Habitat Mitigation in Prado Basin 1/29/2010 12/31/2013 245,000.00$ -$ 245,000.00$ 191,714.71$ 53,285.29$ Carlos Quintero

SAWA387-04 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Plant Control & Biological Monitoring 6/28/2012 3/31/2015 165,000.00$ 48,320.00$ 213,320.00$ -$ 213,320.00$ Ian Achimore

SAWA387-05 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Santa Ana Sucker Conservation - Habitat Survey 6/14/2013 7/31/2013 23,706.00$ -$ 23,706.00$ 23,706.00$ -$ Ian Achimore

SKR392-02 1938 Elizabeth Jane Skrzat EC PR Blog Support 9/9/2013 6/30/2014 36,000.00$ -$ 36,000.00$ 26,425.87$ 9,574.13$ Mark Norton

SKRZ373-01 1938 Elizabeth Jane Skrzat Social Media & Outreach Program 7/17/2013 6/30/2014 20,350.00$ -$ 20,350.00$ 14,525.00$ 5,825.00$ Mark Norton

WO#2014-30 2006 Source Molecular Sample Analysis 9/12/2013 6/30/2014 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 9,825.00$ 175.00$ Rick Whetsel

SRI326-01 2009 Statistical Research Inc Section 106 Report - Reach V Repairs 10/1/2013 6/30/2014 7,957.46$ 5,917.46$ 13,874.92$ 13,841.40$ 33.52$ Carlos Quintero

TKE240-01 1995 TKE Engineering & Planning Brine Line Pretreatment Program 5/29/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 16,480.00$ 8,520.00$ Rich Haller

DODS323-03 1189 Tom Dodson & Associates Biological Monitoring Repairs- Unlined RCP Reach IV-A & B Construction 5/20/2011 12/31/2012 27,300.00$ -$ 27,300.00$ 14,920.40$ 12,379.60$ David Ruhl

PO 2816 1961 Trench Shoring Blanket Purchase Order - Steel Plate Rental 1/23/2014 6/30/2014 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ 1,347.00$ 653.00$ Carlos Quintero

TRU240-08 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc Phase # 3 Ongoing Water Quality Monitoring & Analysis 8/17/2012 6/30/2013 21,884.00$ -$ 21,884.00$ 21,868.17$ 15.83$ Rich Haller

TRU240-09 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc County Line Sampling System 7/30/2013 12/31/2013 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 7,143.29$ 2,856.71$ Rich Haller

WO#2014-49 1771 United Storm Water Line Cleaning Support 4B Upper 2/20/2014 6/30/2014 2,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ 2,388.70$ 111.30$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-54 1771 United Storm Water Line Cleaning Support 3/28/2014 6/30/2014 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,613.15$ 386.85$ Carlos Quintero

URS326-01 2026 URS Corporation VE Workshop 2/28/2014 6/30/2014 6,638.00$ -$ 6,638.00$ 6,375.98$ 262.02$ David Ruhl

WPI240-01 1819 Wayne Perry Inc Brine Line On-Call Potholing Services 6/19/2012 6/30/2014 86,440.00$ -$ 86,440.00$ 51,877.50$ 34,562.50$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2014-16 1217 Western Municipal Water District Brine Line Operations & Maintenance 7/15/2013 6/30/2014 283,486.00$ -$ 283,486.00$ 76,020.51$ 207,465.49$ David Ruhl

WILD374-07 1281 Wildermuth Environmental Inc Recomputation of Ambient Water Quality 7/2/2013 6/30/2014 347,271.00$ -$ 347,271.00$ 295,431.46$ 51,839.54$ Mark Norton

WILD374-08 1281 Wildermuth Environmental Inc Addendum - 2008 SAR Wasteland Allocation Model 1/27/2014 11/30/2014 80,000.00$ -$ 80,000.00$ 19,574.75$ 60,425.25$ Mark Norton

YEAG373-03 1591 Yeager Environmental LLC OWOW 2.0 Support Services 11/23/2013 6/30/2014 24,740.00$ -$ 24,740.00$ 9,660.00$ 15,080.00$ Mark Norton

Annual Support Contracts Annual Support Contracts

ACS100-05 1842 Accent Computer Solutions Support for Ongoing IT Projects 7/31/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 22,075.49$ 2,924.51$ Dean Unger

TDGI10000-16 1326 The Dolphin Group Legislative & Government Relations Consulting 6/25/2013 6/30/2016 115,000.00$ -$ 115,000.00$ 101,500.00$ 13,500.00$ Celeste Cantú

GRES100-01 1935 Gresham Savage Nolan & Tilden PC GM Evaluation 4/24/2014 5/30/2014 8,730.00$ -$ 8,730.00$ 8,730.00$ -$ Phil Anthony

INSOL100-05 1648 Integrated Systems Solutions GP Software- Technical Support 9/23/2013 6/30/2014 5,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 6,130.50$ 1,369.50$ Dean Unger

KON100-01 1147 Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc OnBase Support and Migration 8/14/2013 6/30/2014 10,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 15,581.25$ 2,418.75$ Dean Unger

WO#2014-13 1890 Southern California Fleet Services Agency Vehicle Maintenance 6/26/2013 6/30/2014 3,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 6,813.78$ 686.22$ Rich Haller

WCD100-01 1674 Web Casa Design Website Redesign 3/5/2012 6/30/2013 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 8,500.00$ 1,500.00$ Dean Unger

WCD100-02 1674 Web Casa Design Website Redesign Support 8/13/2013 6/30/2014 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ 1,105.00$ 3,895.00$ Dean Unger

1,543,870.52$

82

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityBrine Line Debt Service Funding Analysis

May 31, 2014

FYE T-Strip Capacity Rates Loan Pymts Interest Earned * Ending CashMaturity (a) Loan Receipts (b) © ( d ) (e) Excess Cash Balance

Beginning Balance 3,813,182 2014 2,449,000 795,772 998,000 (4,578,510) 76,264 (259,475) 3,553,707 2015 2,349,000 795,772 1,034,000 (4,461,810) 71,074 (211,964) 3,341,743 2016 1,824,000 795,772 1,034,000 (4,055,340) 66,835 (334,733) 3,007,010 2017 949,000 795,772 1,034,000 (3,060,725) 60,140 (221,812) 2,785,198 2018 949,000 795,772 1,034,000 (3,060,725) 55,704 (226,249) 2,558,949 2019 395,000 528,582 1,034,000 (2,526,801) 51,179 (518,040) 2,040,909 2020 395,000 - 1,034,000 (2,170,551) 40,818 (700,733) 1,340,177 2021 395,000 - 1,034,000 (2,170,551) 26,804 (714,747) 625,429 2022 395,000 - 1,034,000 (1,943,236) 12,509 (501,728) 123,702 2023 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,474 (7,799) 115,903 2024 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,318 (7,955) 107,947 2025 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,159 (8,114) 99,833 2026 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,997 (8,277) 91,557 2027 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,831 (8,442) 83,114 2028 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,662 (8,610) 74,504 2029 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,490 (8,783) 65,721 2030 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,314 (8,959) 56,762 2031 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,135 (9,138) 47,624 2032 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 952 (9,321) 38,303 2033 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 766 (9,507) 28,796

10,100,000 4,507,442 20,644,000 (39,515,253) 479,425 (3,784,385) 28,796

*Interest earned is based on a conservative 2.00% average return over the period

83

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityDebt Service Payment Schedule

FY 2014 - 2033

RemainingFYE Interest Principal Total Payment Principal2014 917,806 3,660,704 4,578,510 29,125,074 2015 827,925 3,633,884 4,461,810 25,491,190 2016 716,452 3,338,888 4,055,340 22,152,302 2017 615,366 2,445,358 3,060,725 19,706,943 2018 539,727 2,520,997 3,060,725 17,185,946 2019 461,459 2,065,342 2,526,801 15,120,604 2020 395,403 1,775,147 2,170,551 13,345,456 2021 348,294 1,822,257 2,170,551 11,523,199 2022 299,932 1,643,304 1,943,236 9,879,895 2023 256,877 787,396 1,044,273 9,092,499 2024 236,405 807,868 1,044,273 8,284,631 2025 215,400 828,873 1,044,273 7,455,758 2026 193,850 850,424 1,044,273 6,605,335 2027 171,739 872,535 1,044,273 5,732,800 2028 149,052 895,220 1,044,273 4,837,580 2029 125,777 918,496 1,044,273 3,919,084 2030 101,896 942,377 1,044,273 2,976,707 2031 77,394 966,879 1,044,273 2,009,828 2032 52,256 992,018 1,044,273 1,017,810 2033 26,463 1,017,810 1,044,273 (0)

$0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

Mil

lio

ns

Debt Service Payment ScheduleFiscal Years 2014-2033

Principal

Interest

84

$58 $$61

$66

$71

ons

Total Cash & Investments

$55

$58$59 $57 $58

$59$59

$58 $58 $58

$57 $56

$41

$46

$51

$56

$61

Jun'13 Jul'13 Aug'13 Sep'13 Oct'13 Nov'13 Dec'13 Jan'14 Feb'14 Mar'14 Apr'14 May'14

Millio

85

Checking Money CalTRUST LAIF Savings Investment Certificates Treasury Grant

(Cash) Market Investments Account EPA Securities of Deposit Strips Retention

100 General Fund 1,449,284$ 1,018,102 - - 431,182 - - - - - 1,449,284$ 100 Building Reserve 611,174$ - - - 611,174 - - - - - 611,174$ 370 Basin Planning General 122,610$ - - - 122,610 - - - - - 122,610$ 370 USBR Partnership Studies 3,378$ - - - 3,378 - - - - - 3,378$ 387 Mitigation Bank Credits 1,224,015$ - - - 1,224,015 - - - - - 1,224,015$ 240 Self Insurance Reserve 3,516,079$ - - - 3,516,079 - - - - - 3,516,079$ 240 Brine Line Debt Retirement 10,406,552$ - - - - - 3,762,605 - 6,643,947 - 10,406,552$ 240 Brine Line - Pipeline Replacement 24,264,883$ - 622,863 2,122,996 19,000,847 - 284,300 2,233,877 - - 24,264,883$ 240 Brine Line - OCSD Rehabilitation 5,400,890$ - - - 5,400,890 - - - - - 5,400,890$ 240 Brine Line - Capacity Management 3,873,813$ - - - 3,873,813 - - - - - 3,873,813$ 240 Brine Line - OCSD Future Capacity 1,696,440$ - - - 1,696,440 - - - - - 1,696,440$ 240 B i Li Fl I b l R 69 132$ 69 132 69 132$

RESERVE BALANCE & SOURCE OF FUNDSMay 31, 2014

Reserve Accounts Cash and Investments

Total Total

240 Brine Line - Flow Imbalance Reserve 69,132$ - - - 69,132 - - - - - 69,132$ 240 Brine Line - Operating Reserve 2,316,095$ - - - 2,316,095 - - - - - 2,316,095$ 401 Legal Defense Fund 443,243$ - - - - 443,243 - - - - 443,243$ 372 Imported Water Recharge 36,221$ - - - 36,221 - - - - - 36,221$ 374 Basin Monitoring Program TF 179,485$ - - - 179,485 - - - - - 179,485$ 384 Middle SAR TMDL TF 172,918$ - - - 172,918 - - - - - 172,918$ 386 Storm WQ Standards TF 56,526$ - - - 56,526 - - - - - 56,526$ 381 SAR Fish Conservation 46,564$ - - - 46,564 - - - - - 46,564$ 392 Emerging Constituents TF 160,174$ - - - 160,174 - - - - - 160,174$ 500 Prop 13 - Grant Retention 44,760$ - - - - - - - - 44,760 44,760$

56,094,238$ 1,018,102$ 622,863$ 2,122,996$ 38,917,545$ 443,243$ 4,046,905$ 2,233,877$ 6,643,947$ 44,760$ 56,094,238$

86

Securities$4,046,905

7%

Certificates of Deposit$2,233,877

4%

CalTRUST Investments$2,122,996

4%

Money Market Funds$622,863

1%

Grant Retention$44 760

Cash & Investments ‐May 2014$56,094,238

T‐Strips$6,643,947

12%

Savings ‐ EPA$443,243

1%LAIF

$38,917,54569%

$44,7600%

Checking Accounts$1,018,102

2%

87

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityReserve Account Analysis

May 31, 2014

Estimated Balance @ Interest Fund Loan/T-Strip Debt Service Inter-Fund Fund Balance @ Fund Balance @

Reserve Account 6/30/2013 Earned Contributions Receipts Payments Loans Expenses 5/31/2014 Changes 6/30/2014

Brine Line Operating Reserve (407,104) 3,854 7,926,524 (5,207,179) 2,316,095 - 2,270,849 Flow Imbalance Reserve 79,245 267 (10,380) 69,131 - 79,028 OCSD Future Capacity 1,690,750 5,691 - 1,696,440 - 709,805 Capacity Management 2,584,499 9,132 1,280,182 3,873,813 - 1,660,192 Pipeline Replacement 25,881,583 84,688 30,459 (1,731,847) 24,264,883 (1,927,047) 22,337,836 OCSD Rehabilitation 5,327,229 17,960 55,701 5,400,890 - 5,400,890 Debt Retirement 3,813,182 12,076 914,837 3,244,772 (4,222,260) 3,762,605 83,167 3,845,772 Self Insurance 3,412,845 11,568 91,667 3,516,079 8,333 3,524,412 General Fund 1,336,799 6,570 930,306 (338,886) (485,505) 1,449,284 - 1,449,284 Building Reserve 511,902 1,983 100,000 (2,712) 611,174 - 611,174

46,325,606 153,788 11,329,675 3,244,772 (4,222,260) (338,886) (7,437,623) 46,960,394 (1,835,546) 41,889,242

88

$1 800 000

$2,000,000

$2,200,000

$2,400,000

$2,600,000

$2,800,000

Twelve Month Maturity ScheduleSecurities

40%

$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

< 1 YR 1 to 2 YRS 2 to 3 YRS 3 to 4 YRS 4 to 5 YRS

20%

12%16%

12%

89

SAWPATREASURER'S REPORT

As of May 2014

Investment T-Strips Safekeeping CBB

Purchase Maturity Initial Current Book Market Interest

T-STRIPS Debt Date Date PAR Cost Discount Discount Value Value RateBAIS SARI 04/13/1995 11/15/2015 2,275,000.00 513,017.75 1,761,982.25 243,031.18 2,031,968.82 2,270,077.25 7.61%

CBB WEST RIV 07/09/1999 11/15/2017 1,336,000.00 469,227.00 866,773.42 198,546.77 1,137,453.23 1,312,686.80 6.33%

CBB WEST RIV 07/12/1999 05/15/2018 880,000.00 298,021.00 581,979.20 146,227.87 733,772.13 857,021.00 5.29%

CBB TVRI 02/11/2000 05/15/2020 2,370,000.00 773,832.65 1,596,167.35 478,511.48 1,891,488.52 2,243,758.00 5.65%

6,861,000.00$ 2,054,098.40$ 4,806,902.22$ 1,066,317.30$ 5,794,682.70 6,683,543.05$ 6.22%

Investment Commercial Safekeeping CBB

Purchase Maturity Unit Current Market Interest

Type Security Date Date Cost Cost Principal Value Value RateAgency FHLB 3/29/2011 3/13/2015 103.30 516,505.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 510,165.00 2.75%Agency FHLMC 3/27/2014 3/27/2019 109.33 546,650.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 552,095.00 3.75%Agency FNMA 3/27/2014 2/19/2019 100.40 501,975.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 508,455.00 1.88%Agency FNMA 3/8/2013 2/14/2018 100.00 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 999,380.00 1.75%Agengy FNMA 3/27/2013 3/27/2018 100.00 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 984,780.00 1.00%Agency USTN 1/26/2011 7/31/2015 99.84 499,218.75$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 509,355.00 1.75%CD Discover 3/6/2013 3/6/2017 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 251,024.27 0.95%CD Goldman Sachs 3/6/2013 3/7/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 251,205.97 0.75%CD American Express 3/7/2013 3/7/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00 0.75%CD Ally Bank 4/17/2013 4/18/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,765.48 0.65%CD CIT Bank 3/13/2013 3/13/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 247,180.70 1.10%CD BMW Bank 3/8/2013 3/8/2017 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,329.49 0.85%CD GE Capital Bank 1/31/2014 1/31/2017 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 249,314.56 1.00%CD GE Capital Retail 1/31/2014 1/31/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 250,360.13 1.45%CD Key Bank 3/13/2013 3/13/2015 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,099.12 0.45%

6,306,348.75$ 6,242,000.00$ 6,242,000.00$ 6,312,509.72

90

SUMMARY OFLABOR MULTIPLIERS

Benefit Rate

Total Employee Benefits 941,702 0.396

Total Payroll 2,380,296

Gross G&A Costs 2,458,809Less: Member Contributions & Other Revenue (605,000)G&A Costs for Distribution 1,853,809

G&A Rate

Direct Labor 1,138,420 1.628

G&A Costs 1,853,809

FY 2013-14 Labor multiplier - thru 5/31/14 2.024

FY 2012-13 Labor multiplier 1.938





91

Actual thru Actual thruG/L Acct. Description 5/31/14 G/L Acct. Description 5/31/14

51000 Salaries - Regular 1,241,876$ 60171 Equipment Rented 44,105$ 52000 Benefits 425,588$ 60172 Equipment Repair / Maintenance 589$ 60111 Tuition Reimbursement 190$ 60180 Computer Hardware 14,109$ 60112 Training 2,537$ 60181 Software / Updates / Licensing 41,657$ 60113 Education 30$ 60182 Internet Services 15,051$ 60114 Other Training & Education 2,765$ 60183 Computer Supplies 2,546$ 60120 Audit Fees 25,100$ 60184 Computer Repair / Maintenance 471$ 60121 Consulting 151,984$ 60190 Offsite Meeting / Travel Expense 4,524$ 60126 Temporary Services -$ 60191 In House Meetings 2,081$ 60128 Other Professional Services 3,480$ 60192 Conference Expense 17,521$ 60129 Other Contract Services -$ 60193 Car, Repair, Maint -$ 60130 Legal Fees 262$ 60200 Dues 25,113$ 60133 Employment Recruitment 3,467$ 60202 Subscriptions 15,789$ 60153 Materials & Supplies 9$ 60203 Contributions 6,849$ 60154 Safety 632$ 60210 Bank Charges 112$ 60155 Security 2,901$ 60211 Shipping / Postage 3,505$

$ $

GENERAL FUND COSTS( to be Distributed)

60156 Custodial Contract Services 15,799$ 60212 Office Supplies 7,433$ 60157 Landscaping Maintenance 11,703$ 60213 Offsite Storage 2,426$ 60158 HVAC 1,471$ 60220 Commission Fees 12,740$ 60159 Facility Repair & Maintenance 13,849$ 60221 Commission Mileage Reimb. 3,485$ 60160 Telephone 16,760$ 60222 Other Commission Expense 46$ 60161 Cellular / Paging Services 12,082$ 60230 Other Expense 2,034$ 60163 Electricity 21,111$ 80000 Retiree Medical Expense 133,913$ 60164 Water Services 5,236$ 80001 Insurance Expense 30,479$ 60170 Equipment Expensed 10,143$ 80000 Building Repair/Replacement Reserve 91,667$

13005 Fixed Assets 11,591$

Total Costs 2,458,809$

Direct Costs Paid by Projects 1,911,230$ Member Contribution Offset 605,000$ 2,516,230$

Over allocation % 3.1%

(Continued - next column)

92

Actual @ ProjectedG/L Acct Description Budget 5/31/14 FYE 2014

70101 FICA Expense 153,117 124,124$ 135,408$ 70102 Medicare Expense 40,524 34,000$ 37,091$ 70103 State Unemployment Insurance 5,880 6,470$ 7,058$ 70104 Worker's Compensation Insurance 61,002 41,324$ 45,081$ 70105 State Disability Insurance 20,957 18,233$ 19,891$ 70106 PERS Pension Plan 507,544 386,416$ 421,545$ 70111 Medical Expense 334,876 253,962$ 277,049$ 70112 Dental Expense 29,819 22,013$ 24,014$ 70113 Vision Insurance 6 187 5 241$ 5 717$

BENEFITS SUMMARY(Distributed based on Actual Labor)

70113 Vision Insurance 6,187 5,241$ 5,717$ 70114 Life Insurance Expense 14,129 10,155$ 11,078$ 70115 Long Term Disability 22,788 13,661$ 14,903$ 70116 Wellness Program Expense 3,000 803$ 876$ 70120 Car Allowance 30,000 25,300$ 27,600$

Total Benefits 1,229,823 941,702 1,027,311 Total Payroll 2,764,682 2,380,296$ 2,596,687$ Benefits Rate 44.5% 39.6% 39.6%

93

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityLabor Hours Budget vs ActualMonth Ending May 31, 2014

Fund Budget Actual %

100 General & Administrative 23,197 20,052 86.44%125 Prop 50 Administration 408 214 52.45%130 Prop 84 Administration 1,372 545 39.72%240 Brine Line Enterprise 16,800 15,979 95.11%320 Brine Line Protection 260 555 213.27%323 Reach 4A & 4B Repairs - - 100.00%326 Reach V Capital Repairs 1,190 799 67.10%

370-01 General Basin Planning 1,925 1,545 80.25%370-02 USBR Partnership Studies 125 167 133.20%

372 Imported Water Recharge 130 33 25.19%373 Watershed Management Plan 2,535 4,948 195.17%374 Basin Monitoring Program 803 228 28.42%381 SAR Fish Conservation 195 312 159.74%

384-01 Chino TMDL Facilitation 175 160 91.43%386 Storm Water Quality Standards TF 240 109 45.42%387 Arundo Removal & Habitat Restoration 260 147 56.54%392 Emerging Constituents 620 118 19.07%395 UCI Research Grant - - 100.00%

477TMDL LESJWA - TMDL Task Force 900 511 56.81%477-02 LESJWA - Administration 545 398 72.98%

502ADMIN Prop 13 Brine Sediment - 2 100.00%51,680 46,819 90.59%

Note: Should be at 92% of budget for 11 months

94

1

SAWPA GENERAL MANAGERS MEETING NOTES TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2014 PARTICIPANTS PRESENT REPRESENTING Paul Jones Eastern Municipal Water District Michael Markus Orange County Water District Doug Headrick San Bernardino Valley Water District Celeste Cantú SAWPA Larry McKenney SAWPA Rich Haller SAWPA Mark Norton SAWPA Sara Villa SAWPA Celeste Cantú called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. at SAWPA, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside. OWOW Emergency Drought Grant 2014 Submittal Mark Norton reported that the deadline for the OWOW Emergency Drought Grant 2014 deadline is July 21 and they will submit it on July 17. There is an OWOW Steering Committee scheduled Thursday, July 10, and Bob Ohlund will present the latest status of the Watermaster Action Team proposal, asking for recommendation for approval to the SAWPA Commission on July 15. There also will be some discussion for the proposed project implementation committee. Mark Norton said that he’s been meeting with Bob Ohlund to go over some of the details of the application, and there have been some revisions to the budget. A handout was provided to the General Managers referencing the implementation effort breakdown of the budget. Paul Jones questioned the line item for Labor Compliance and Mark Norton said that the State requires any grant application to pay prevailing wages for any implementation that is done; it is to certify external consultant resource labor. Mark Norton provided a brief description for certain line items of the handout, and Michael Markus asked if SAWPA has to prepare a budget for each grant that is awarded. Celeste Cantú said that SAWPA prepares one budget for all the grants per round. Discussion ensued regarding the Project Implementation Committee budget for $299,357.36. Paul Jones agreed on including the SAWPA Administration and Project Implementation Committee budget handouts in the grant application; although he believes we can use our current staff resources to minimize costs by designing an efficient setup for implementation and monitoring. Grants Manager Celeste Cantú reported that the Commission has asked her to look at alternatives to hiring a Grants Manager. She has contacted Elan and will contact Kennedy Jenks and others. She asked the General Managers if they had any recommendations on other firms. Recommended firms were RMC, HDR, and Greg Kahlen from Kahlen Group. Celeste Cantú expressed concern with hiring a contractor and not establishing a relationship with DWR that is consistent with the grant. Paul Jones noted that with these firms, that is their selling point; they already have that relationship with DWR and they set up meetings, expedite documents, and provide a higher level and better quality of work. She asked if the General Managers have an RFP template to use, and Paul Jones said he would send her one. BRINE LINE UPDATE

Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvement Project Construction Management Services, Project Schedule Rich Haller said staff will request that the Commission approve to advertise for bids for the Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvement Project. He noted that they currently are 95% complete, they have received the specs and plans, and Larry McKenney will review them. Rich Haller said the relocation of the pipeline through Castle & Cooke property settlement agreement has been completed and the next step is doing the design.

99

2

Pretreatment Program Update Rich Haller said OCSD submitted a letter with many comments that they want revised and addressed within six months. Staff hopes to be able to address the comments, although a consultant may be needed. SAWPA wants to be prepared for the audit by EEC in the fall. Flow Projections Update Rich Haller provided a handout to the General Managers of the flow projections that show as 35 mgd. These numbers were provided to the member agencies. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Webinar – Santa Ana River Watershed – Informed Budgeting Pilot & USACE Watershed Projects Celeste Cantú provided handouts to the General Managers of a webinar presentation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A follow up meeting is scheduled on July 17. EPA – Proposed Rule Defining “Waters of the U.S.” Larry McKenney said that ACWA and Jolene Walsh from EMWD are engaged in developing the rule in defining “Waters of the U.S.”, and still are waiting on the scientific study from the EPA. Paul Jones provided a handout of a letter that was done regarding examples of recycled water ponds. Larry McKenney said we can add to the discussion at a SAWPA level on how this affects and relates to the MS4 permits and stormwater compliance. DWR Water – Energy Grant Solicitation Celeste Cantú informed the General Managers that there is a DWR Water–Energy Grant Solicitation of $19 M statewide. Mark Norton said that the proposal is for $2.5 M and it is a statewide competition and does not have to go through the IRWM process, and they are focusing on helping Disadvantaged Communities (DAC). He asked the General Managers if they have any interest. Discussion ensued and it was decided that as soon as the Watermaster Action grant is finished, they can focus on layering this one right afterwards. The first hearing is scheduled in August and it won’t be due until December. Policy Response to a Prolonged Drought Celeste Cantú said that the Governor asked the State Water Board to hold hearings to better respond to the drought, and Phil Anthony had asked that the General Managers put together a response to a prolonged drought. She recommends documenting what we’ve done, and taking a proactive approach to protect ourselves based on our accomplishments. Some of the principles that we propose are chasing Water Use Efficiency, not Water Conservation, that budget based rates have been successful, and that we have an outside study from UC Riverside. Paul Jones recommends taking inventory for water use efficiency requirements since the 2009 compliance barometer for Southern California, particularly in this area in terms of what we’ve done to meet and surpass those goals, and also to use water recycling. Celeste Cantú said that Phil Anthony asked her to take the lead on this. It was recommended that a letter and resolution containing all the documentation, addressed to the State Board Administration, be taken to the Commission for approval next Tuesday. SCHEDULING - NEXT GM MEETING August 12, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. John Rossi adjourned the meeting at 9:27 a.m.

100

S A W P A€¦ · A. PRESENTATION ON CHINO II DESALTER OPERATIONS AND SALINITY MANAGEMENT IN THE...

Documents

Transcript of S A W P A€¦ · A. PRESENTATION ON CHINO II DESALTER OPERATIONS AND SALINITY MANAGEMENT IN THE...