Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group Ozone Profile Retrieval from MetOp R. Siddans,...
-
Upload
vincent-holland -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group Ozone Profile Retrieval from MetOp R. Siddans,...
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Remote Sensing Group
Ozone Profile Retrieval from MetOp
R. Siddans, G. Miles, B. Latter A. Waterfall, B. Kerridge
Acknowledgements:NERC/NCEO for funding this workEUMETSAT & ECMWF for provision of dataDr N Richards (U. Leeds) TOMCAT data
NCEO Atmospheric Composition Theme
Remote Sensing GroupDevelopmentsOzone ECV Project• Delivered sonde-matched pixels for 2008 test year to round
robin exercise• Additionally 3 days per month (all orbits) for more detailed
spatial comparison• Begun comparisons with models and official Ozone SAF
product (KNMI)• Identified opportunities to improve aspects of our retrieval
scheme
Additionally• Contribution to NCEO-theme partner N. Richards (U. Leeds)• Through visiting scientist project delivered prototype modules
from RAL scheme for experimental use at KNMI• Ongoing comparisons to models (TOMCAT, MACC)
Remote Sensing Group
GO
ME
GO
ME
TOMCAT
TOMCAT +G1AK
GOME-1 (1995-2011) aboard ERS-2 platform as compared to TOMCAT
24-26th February 1997 average
TOMCAT + G1AK
TOMCAT
GOME-1
MACC + G2AK
TOMCAT + G2AK
GOME-2
24-26th July 2008 average
Model data sampled as GOME-2 would see it, with averaging kernels applied
GO
ME-
2G
OM
E-2
TOMCAT + G2AK
MACC +G2AK
Remote Sensing Group
In Development• Comparisons to both sondes and models indicate some aspects
of the scheme can be improved upon• Some spurious high tropospheric ozone values in NH spring • This might be improved by implementing a polarisation
correction in the radiative transfer
0-6km
G2-sonde mean biasG2-sonde(AK) mean bias 6-12km
Remote Sensing Group
Broad absorption bands 420-650 nm – large continuum
overlapped with diffuse vibrational structure
– First steps to analyse the information content for GOME-2 in this spectral region
© 2010 RalSpace
Next steps – Chappuis Bands
Remote Sensing Group
© 2010 RalSpace
Next steps – Chappuis Bands
- Potentially more information about ozone closer to the surface over land as higher reflectance in the visible
- Requires accurately characterised surface properties to fit the measured reflectance due to broad nature of Chappuis bands
Remote Sensing GroupNext steps – Polarisation CorrectionNeglecting polarisation in radiative transfer calculation can:– Cause inaccuracies in surface albedo and scattering
parameter estimates– This can lead to overestimate in ozone absorption• Implement polarisation correction in Huggins Bands
© 2010 RalSpace
0-6k
m O
zone
Albedo
Remote Sensing GroupNext steps – Joint Scheme
• Further develop Joint IASI-GOME-2 retrieval scheme• Compare to existing individual schemes
GOME-2 Only GOME-2 + IASI
AK 6km
AK 12km
AK 6km
AK 12km
Remote Sensing GroupIn Development• Comparisons to both sondes and models indicate some
aspects of the scheme can be improved upon• High tropospheric ozone values in NH spring suggesting need
to implement a polarisation correction in the radiative transfer
24th April 2008
With extended QC and filtering:
Scheme with basic QC:
0-6k
m O
zone
Remote Sensing Group
1st June 0-6km Sub-column
Why do we retrieve the slit function?Not retrieving the slit function:
With slit function retrieval:2007 2008 2009
Remote Sensing GroupGlobal monthly mean sonde bias
G2-sondeG2-sonde+G2AK
• Bias changing with time due to instrument degradation
• Small positive bias• larger in 2010 after last decontamination test
Without retrieving instrument slit function width
Retrieving instrument slit function width
Remote Sensing GroupThrough-put degradation
Retrieved slit function width Mean absolute Wavelength shift (band 2)
• Dashed lines indicate instrument decontamination tests. • Final test in September 2009.
Remote Sensing Group
© 2010 RalSpace
Fitting of the Eigenvectors
Mean residual fitting only
Band 2 fit cost
Remote Sensing Group
© 2010 RAL Space
RAL GOME-2 Ozone Scheme Overview
• 3-step retrieval: band 1a, surface albedo, band 2b.• Use sun-normalised radiance in Hartley and Huggins bands to measure ozone
in Earth’s atmosphere• Forward model inc. Rayleigh + cloud scattering, surface • Huggins band reveals information on tropospheric ozone, requires precision of
fit >0.1%.• For band 1, absolute calibration is important, especially for stratospheric
ozone.• For band 2, a good estimate of noise is important for precision of the fitting for
tropospheric ozone
Fit residuals < 0.1%
cloud-free
cloudy
Measured spectra in Huggins bandsOzone absorption
Remote Sensing GroupRAL MetOp Ozone
GOME-2 Retrieval Scheme
• UV/Vis spectrometer• Optimal estimation retrieval
with sun-normalised radiance
• Uses Huggins band to add information for tropospheric ozone
• Requires fit precision < 0.1% for tropospheric ozone
IASI Retrieval Scheme
• Optimal estimation scheme
• Uses RTTOV as forward model (with recomputed coefficients)
• State vector: Ozone, Surface Temperature, H2O and Surface Emissivity (using MODIS/Wisconsin data as prior)
© 2010 RalSpace
Remote Sensing Group
Ozone SAF OOP 0-6km
Co-adding 4 pixels along track, cloud screened
RAL GOME-2 Ozone 0-6 km
We have experimented with co-adding pixels along and across track, to improve the quality of GOME-2 tropospheric ozone.
Remote Sensing GroupAVHRR/3 Cloud Products for GOME-2 and IASI
• Oxford RAL Aerosol Cloud (ORAC) Scheme• Retrieve cloud properties for high resolution AVHRR imager pixels,
combine for GOME-2 or IASI pixels– optical depth– effective radius– cloud top pressure– cloud fraction +
• Products can be used for screening data for quality control or used directly in radiative transfer model Effective RadiusOptical DepthFalse colour (measured)
Remote Sensing GroupUse of AVHRR/3 imager data for GOME and IASI ozone
Relative sensitivity of GOME to lower
tropospheric ozone
Across-track pixel
Relative sensitivity of GOME to ozone profile compared to cloud-free conditions (from RTM)
ORAC
Cloud height / kmOptical Depth/ km
Remote Sensing Group
• AVHRR and GOME-2 derived O3 factors are comparable
• AVHRR O3SF more sensitive than GOME-2 cloud flag (contributing sub-pixel information)
• Used for screening for the affects of cloud
• Putting factors directly into RTM
GOME-2 vs AVHRR Derrived Ozone Sensitivity Factor (O3SF)
IASI GOME-2 Pixel matching
IASI pixel within GOME-2 pixel selected for lowest cloud factor,
derived with AVHRR
TES 0-6 km Ozone:1 month of observations gridded 2x2 degrees
22-24th August 2008
RAL GOME-2 Ozone:Co-added 4 pixels along track
GOME-2 and TES 0-6km
Statistical comparison of GOME-2 vs Sondes
(2008, global)Prior vs Sondes
Retrieval vs Sondes
Retrievals vs Sondes x Averaging
kernels
IASI + GOME dashed
Remote Sensing GroupAVHRR Cloud products for GOME-2 and IASI• Oxford RAL Aerosol Cloud (ORAC)
Scheme• Retrieve cloud properties for high
resolution AVHRR imager pixels, combine for GOME-2 or IASI pixels
• Retrieve optical depth, effective radius, cloud top pressure, cloud fraction
Z* / km
Effective RadiusOptical Depth
Remote Sensing GroupAVHRR Cloud and Ozone Sensitivity Factor (O3SF)• Ozone factor derived from
AVHRR or GOME-2 cloud properties
• Quantifies relative sensitivity to ozone in the troposphere
• AVHRR has sub-pixel cloud sensitivity
• AVHRR O3SF more sensitive to high cloud
• GOME-2 O3SF potentially better over multilayer cloud
Remote Sensing Group
Single orbit: GOME only retrieval + Avg. Kernels on 23 Aug 2008
10
12 M
ole
c/cm
3
Remote Sensing GroupRAL IASI Ozone Retrieval Scheme
• Optimal estimation scheme
• Uses RTTOV as forward model (with recomputed coefficients)
• State vector = Ozone, Surface Temperature, H2O and Surface Emissivity
Remote Sensing Group
GOME-2 only Ozone 0-6km
IASI only Ozone 0-6km
NIGHT
DAYMetOp Joint Ozone Scheme:
- Directly fits GOME-2 and IASI spectra simultaneously in non-linear retrieval- IASI FM based on RTTOV- Uses AVHRR ORAC scheme to identify IASI pixel least affected by cloud- Fits down to noise in most scenes