Do roads bring votes? Democratic accountability in rural ...
Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
-
Upload
devendrachoudharyupsc -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
1/38
1
Rural Development Through
Democratic Decentralizat ion
Prof. R. Suryanarayana Reddy
Center Head, CDP&AAMR-APARD
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
2/38
2
Initially, a two-tier planning was initiated at theNational and State levels. The planners and
policy-makers did, however, realise thelimitations of this system for a country as big insize and diversity as India. They felt that multi-level planning was meeded if the fruits of
development were to reach the grass-rootlevel, otherwise there was always a possibilityof losing sight of problems, requirements andpotentials of the local areas while planning
form the State headquarter.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
3/38
3
Under the Constitutional arrangements,various subjects were divided into three
categories-Central, State and Concurrent.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
4/38
4
Rural Development is a concurrent
subject, wherein the national policies
are framed with the consensus of all
the States.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
5/38
5
The idea of decentralised planning
below the State level has featured
consistently in all the Five-Year Plans.
The First Five-Year Plan talked about
breaking the National and State plansinto local units based on district, town
and villages. It did not, however,
elaborate the way decentralisationwould be put into operation.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
6/38
6
First experiment in this regard, the CommunityDevelopment Blocks were established so thatinfrastructure was created at the block level forintegration of the administrative anddevelopment functions. The block level staffwas entrusted with the responsibility of
initiating all round development of the villages.However, it certainly lacked the popularinvolvement, as its scope was limited. Theprogramme was empowered only with
economic and administrative decentralisationand not with political decentralisation, whichwas vital for its success.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
7/387
Second Five Year Plan, It was clearly
stated that district would be the pivot of
the structure of democratic planning. In
emphasising planning at the district level
and below, the objective was to carrythe district and State plans as close to
the people as possible through local
community participation and co-operative self-help.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
8/388
Balwantrai Mehata Committee constituted by
Government in 1958 on communitydevelopment and plan projects,recommended decentralisation ofadministration and democratization of power.Under the scheme of democraticdecentralisation, a democratic body in eachdevelopment block for all the developmentactivities at that level was suggested, i.e. Athree-tier integrated organic structure with
Gram Panchayats at the base, ZillaPanchayat (ZP) at the apex and PanchayatSamities or Kshetra Samities in-between.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
9/389
Acceptance of these recommendations
by the National Development Council
(NDC)
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
10/3810
The State legislatures passed legislations to
create these bodies in their states. These legislations provided for development
of districts as their main unit. Simultaneously,
these bodies were given enough powers not
only to raise resources but also to requisitionthe machinery at the district and lower levels
to implement development plans to
Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs)
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
11/38
11
Third Five-Year Plan and it was proposed that
the States should formulate their annual
plans, at least in the following activities on the
basis of district and block level plans.
1. Agriculture, including minor irrigation, soil
conservation, village forests, animalhusbandry, dairying, etc.,
2. Development of co-operatives;
3. Village industries;
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
12/38
12
4. Elementary education, especially
provision of school buildings for local
communities;
5. Rural water supply, programme of
minimum rural amenities, including
construction of approach roads linking eachvillage to the nearest road or rail head; and.
6. Works/programmes for fuller utilisation of
manpower resources in rural areas
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
13/38
13
The Administrative Reform Commission in 1967examined the question of planning at the districtlevel. Thereafter the Planning Commission issued
a set of detailed guidelines for preparation ofdistrict plans. These guidelines also visualisedpreparation of a perspective plan along withmedium-term and annual plans. On the basis ofPlanning Commissions guidelines, the State of
Maharashtra started preparation of district plans in1972. It not only identified the schemes for districtplanning boards known as District Developmentand Planning Councils at the district level. Gujaratinitiated district planning in 1979. Karnataka was
the third state to start district level planning aroundthis time. All these States evolved their ownprocedures of devolution of plan funds to thedistricts as well as formulation of plans.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
14/38
14
The new Government at the Union Level in
1977 set-up a Working Group under theChairmanship of M.L.Dantwala to draw up
guidelines for the block-level planning. The
Working Group noted that the remoteness of
the planning agencies from the areas ofimplementation and vastness of geographical
coverage hamper matching of sectoral
financial allocations with location-specific
needs as well as potential for regulating thedistribution of the developmental gains.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
15/38
15
Another committee, headed by Ashok Mehta, wasappointed to inquire into the working of the panchayat
Raj Institutions and to suggest measures tostrenghten them so as to enable the decentralisedsystem of planning and development to be effective.
Ashok Mehta Committee felt that development work infuture needs intricate designing and greater co-ordination, which would be unwise to attempt at the
State level. It also suggested that district planningunit consisting of a professionally qualified teamshould be placed with the ZP.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
16/38
16
The Planning Commission again set-up
a Working Group on district planningunder the chairmanship of C.H.1984,
recommending the stageapproach to
district planning.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
17/38
17
The Seventh Plan document (1985-90)
re-affirmed its faith in the process ofdecentralisation and resolved to follow
the process on the lines suggested by the
Rao Committee.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
18/38
18
In 1985, the Planning Commission
appointed a committee under thechairmanship of G.V.K. Rao to review
existing administrative arrangements for
rural development and to suggestappropriate structural mechanism to
activate PRIs.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
19/38
19
The Eighth Five-Year Plan (1992-97) was launched from 1stApril 1992 against the background of two years of pooreconomic performance. It offered a package of structural
adjustments in the form of economic liberalisation,privatisation and fiscal disciplinary reforms. The Governmentrecognised that under the evolved system, people havebecome mere passive observers and receivers of doles.Hence, the emphasis Institutions (PRIs) as the focal point fororganising and implementing rural development programmes.
Tjis approach was consistent with the views of MahatmaGandhi and the Recommendations of Ashok MehtaCommittee on PRIs. The socio-economic activities likeeducation and literacy, health and family planning, landimprovement, minor irrigation, recovery and development ofwaste-land and afforestation were treated as coreactivitiesin which peoples participation could be maximum and morefruitful. It would also result in lowering financial outlays onthese activities. Government envisaged a happy marriagebetween integrated area development approach anddemocratic decentralisation of rural development.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
20/38
20
The Ninth Plan (1997-2002) provides
that the PRIs should prepare plans foreconomic development and social
justice for an integrated development of
the district.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
21/38
21
Certain broad principles are laid down forassigning a role to each of the three-tiers; the
actual devolution could be based on the rulethat what can be done at a lower level shouldbe done at that level, and not at a higherlevel. Initially, the Gram Sabha would list out
developmental priorities and assist in the fairselection of beneficiaries under variousprogrammes and schemes. Thereafter, theplanning process would begin from below
with the preparation of village plans, whichwould be incorporated into the intermediatelevel Block plans and finally merged into aDistrict Plan.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
22/38
22
Union Government has set apart 41 per cent
of plan resources for decentralised planning,including un-tied funds andincentive grants
to match the contributions raised by PRIs.
Thereafter sectoral allocations at the State
level should be on the basis of demandsmade from below by the districts and in
keeping with the national priorities. In this
way, it would be possible to bring about both a
vertical and a horizontal integration ofresources and services.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
23/38
23
The Ninth Plan aslo lays emphasis on a
comprehensive time bound trainingpolicy for the functionaries, in order to
equip them with updated information
and modern technologies, which in turn
have to be disseminated amongst the
rural people.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
24/38
24
Hitherto, the question of decentralised
planning has been restricted to one ofplanning techniques but it needs to be
extended to the whole process of socio-
political changes.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
25/38
25
The electorate, elected representatives
and the bureaucracy, has to jointlycreate an environment conducive for
these institutions to take roots.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
26/38
26
There are at least six areas where localgovernment empowerment is sought to beachieved through constitutional means.These are:
(i) typology and size,
(ii) electoral representation,(iii) institutional existence and autonomy,
(iv) local functions,
(v) local finance, and
(vi) external accountability.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
27/38
27
While social audit and transparency in
the functioning of PRIs is crucial forevoking peoples participation, the
institutional structure should support
financial and administrative devolution
of power. While rural development
necessitates decentralisation, political
compulsions, many a times, pull
towards centralisation.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
28/38
28
Political parties in power are alwaysuncertain of their position. So they tend to
resist and resent any attempt at setting up oflocal organisations outside their control. TheCentral and Stae leaderships look withsuspicion at the emergence of any strong
decentralised institutional political leadershipand hence evolve ways and means ofcontrolling the power and authority of thelower tiers.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
29/38
29
Despite the obvious struggle for power andcontrol. The Central Government has shownthe political will to constitutionalise the statusof PRIs in larger public interest, theConstitutional Amendment Act, 1992 hastherefore been cherished as a watershedevent for achieving rural developmentthrough democratic decentralisation. It haslaid down certain mandatory provisions interms of structural organisation of PRIs whilethe functional aspects are left to the option of
respective states.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
30/38
30
The catch lies in the areas where each
state has to frame its own laws tooperationalise the mandate given in
favour of strengthening the PRIs.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
31/38
31
Provisions of 73rd Amendment
Mandatory Optional
2-3 tier structure Direct election of GPchairperson
Direct Elections Role and scope of Gram Sabha
Reservations for weaker sections Powers and functions of each
tierFixed Tenure Financial devolution
State Finance Commission Maintenance and Audit ofAccounts
State Election Commission Composition and functions ofDPC
District Planning Committees(DPCs) Reservation to Adhyakshas postsat GP, TP and ZP level by rotation.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
32/38
32
Rural development so far has beencharacterised by centralised planning
withemphasis on macro-level targets than onground level realities and felt needs of thepeople. The bureaucratic system soughtlittle involvement of the community for whom
these programmes were not evaluatedagainst the end objectives viz., removal ofpoverty or improvement of standards of livingin the rural areas.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
33/38
33
Based on the Directive Principles
enshrined in the Constitution, variousGovernments made attempts towards
setting-up of multi-structured Panchayat
Raj system, but did not endow it withrequisite powers and resources.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
34/38
34
It is only now, after more than 45 years
of independence, that 73rd Amendment
of the Constitution enables Panchayats
to play a substantial role in the local
self-government.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
35/38
35
The emergence of PRIs is leading tochanges in rural poor structure as well as theequation between the officials and non-officials. Within the Panchayat Raj set-upthere is a grim fight, directly or indirectly,among the political parties, to capture power,
as it facilitates their political power struggle,at higher levels, as well as among differenttiers of PRIs for appropriating maximumresources. PR system has to surmount many
challenges by evolving consensus in thelong-run, if it has to survive and play animportant role in ensuring growth and equityin rural areas.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
36/38
36
With the 73rd Amendment to the Constitutionenvisaging the establishment of Panchayats
as units of local government, it is mandatoryfor the States to devolve adequate powersand responsibilities upon the PIRs. Thesuccess of this system essentially dependsupon the external as well as the internalpolitico-administrative set-up. Althoughpolitical will is said to have beendemonstrated by away of constitutionalamendment at the Centre and through the
State legislation, yet it needs to be furtherreiterated in terms of devolution of funds,functions and functionaries to the PRIs.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
37/38
37
The aspirations and expectations of the
community though raised by the PRIshave not been fulfilled to a great extent
due to paucity of resources. This has
eroded the faith of the common man in
the local government. The alienation of
people thus shadows their active
participation in developmental process.
-
7/30/2019 Rural Development Through Democratic Decentralization - 2
38/38
At the State government level, it isapprehended that non-empowerment of Gram
Sabhas with inadequate devolution of powers,finances and top-down approach to planning,monitoring and evaluation, manipulation of thepattern of reservation for the posts of
Adhyakshas by the ruling party would
degenerate the democractic anddecentralised character of the PRIs. Further,vesting of major powers, functions and fundsat ZP/TP level could impoverish the GP in
reaching the goal of self-reliance orempowerment of the poor and weak.