RT24: Integration of M&S and DoDAF for Software/IT Systems 2012 RT-24 Post… · Explore ways to...
1
“Dandelion om4s1” DNA Signatures of SysML‐based OPNET Models Equation Graphs Auto‐Generated from SysML Parametrics Structure Group1 scenarios (in G1 rollup model) Group2 scenario Group3 scenario “Dandelion om3s5” “Dandelion Pinwheel” OPNET‐SysML Interfacing Test Case HTTP Traffic Results for ACME News Network Design SysML model with requirements context for OPNET model OPNET model with baseline design & two alternatives HTTP traffic reqt. margin result (via above SysML model) OPNET results SERC Sponsor Research Review, November 13, 2012 RT24: Integration of M&S and DoDAF for Software/IT Systems Russell Peak, Selcuk Cimtalay, Miyako Wilson, et al. Objectives Testbed Results (continued) Approach Contact Summary & Impact ACME News Testbed GIT Aspects Exploiting DoDAF Support in UPDM/SysML • Explore ways to make DoDAF more useful during development & usage of software‐intensive IT systems • Overcome current approach: Burdensome after‐the‐fact documentation generation • Developed new concepts and prototypes as needed (e.g., OPNET interface) and new models for ACME News testbed • Leveraged examples by vendors/others where feasible; adapted, extended, and improved them for RT24 purposes — Provided high value to illustrate RT24 concepts in a wider variety of sponsor‐relevant contexts — Ex. Compare below original vs. RT24‐enhanced models for OV‐4 organizational structure/FTEs • Successfully demonstrated UPDM/SysML‐enabled M&S for IT/network/software domain — Diverse examples in RT24 ACME News Testbed — OPNET, GSM, FTE calculator, deadline timer, ..., with requirements margins in a UPDM/SysML‐based system model context — M&S‐intensive examples from related work • Provides strong evidence that this approach can likely fulfill sponsor needs per RT24 objectives • Impact: Sponsor took SysML training in 2012 & is planning a pilot project Greatly enhanced integration of M&S and DoDAF for software/IT‐intensive systems Russell S. Peak, PhD Senior Researcher MBSE Branch Chief Aerospace Systems Design Lab www.asdl.gatech.edu Georgia Institute of Technology 270 Ferst Drive NW, Weber 123 Atlanta, Georgia 30332‐0150 office +1‐404‐894‐7572 [email protected] • Recognize that UPDM enables “model‐based DoDAF” • Recognize that UPDM Level 1 (L1) includes SysML • Leverage SysML‐enabled modeling & simulation (M&S) • Apply capabilities to representative software‐intensive information systems problem (as proxy for sponsor) • Interface to representative M&S tools (e.g., OPNET) Rapid evolution in recent years (esp. during 2010-2011) UPDM Profile: Top Level Structure UPDM with SysML‐based Parametrics Extended & Improved OV‐4 Model for RT24 (prepared by GIT) Model Structure (schema) Instances: Nested Views Instances: DNA Signature View Model structure statistics: 24 blocks (including generalized org. unit) Instance statistics: 4 org. unit levels = 1 corporation (ACME) with 1 HQ and 2 offices (16 org units & 51 people) ACME News Corp. - 17 org units - 51 people Atlanta HQ - 5 org units - 22 people LA Office - 5 org units - 16 people London Office - 6 org units - 13 people - 17 equations - 68 variables
Transcript of RT24: Integration of M&S and DoDAF for Software/IT Systems 2012 RT-24 Post… · Explore ways to...
“Dandelion om4s1”
DNA Signatures of SysML‐based OPNET ModelsEquation Graphs Auto‐Generated from SysML Parametrics Structure
Group1 scenarios(in G1 rollup model)
Group2 scenario
Group3 scenario
“Dandelion om3s5”
“Dandelion Pinwheel”
OPNET‐SysML Interfacing Test CaseHTTP Traffic Results for ACME News Network Design
SysML model with requirements context for OPNET model OPNET model with baseline design & two alternatives
HTTP traffic reqt. margin result (via above SysML model)
OPNET results
SERC Sponsor Research Review, November 13, 2012
RT24: Integration of M&S and
DoDAF for Software/IT Systems Russell Peak, Selcuk Cimtalay, Miyako Wilson, et al.
Objectives Testbed Results
(continued)
Approach
Contact
Summary & Impact
ACME News Testbed
GIT Aspects Exploiting DoDAF Support in UPDM/SysML
•
Explore ways to make DoDAF more useful during development &
usage of software‐intensive IT systems
•
Overcome current approach:
Burdensome after‐the‐fact documentation generation
•
Developed new concepts and prototypes as needed (e.g., OPNET
interface) and new models for ACME News testbed
•
Leveraged examples by vendors/others where feasible; adapted,
extended, and improved them for RT24 purposes
— Provided high value to illustrate RT24 concepts
in a wider variety of sponsor‐relevant contexts
— Ex. Compare below original vs. RT24‐enhanced models for
OV‐4 organizational structure/FTEs
•
Successfully demonstrated UPDM/SysML‐enabled M&S for
IT/network/software domain
— Diverse examples in RT24 ACME News Testbed
—OPNET, GSM, FTE calculator, deadline timer, ..., with requirements
margins in a UPDM/SysML‐based system model context
—M&S‐intensive examples from related work
•
Provides strong evidence that this approach can likely fulfill
sponsor needs per RT24 objectives
•
Impact:
Sponsor took SysML training in 2012 & is planning a pilot project
Greatly enhanced integration of M&S and DoDAF
for software/IT‐intensive systems
Russell S. Peak, PhD
Senior Researcher
MBSE Branch Chief
Aerospace Systems Design Lab
www.asdl.gatech.edu
Georgia Institute of Technology
270 Ferst Drive NW, Weber 123
Atlanta, Georgia 30332‐0150
office +1‐404‐894‐7572
•
Recognize that UPDM enables “model‐based DoDAF”
•
Recognize that UPDM Level 1 (L1) includes SysML
•
Leverage SysML‐enabled modeling & simulation (M&S)
•
Apply capabilities to representative software‐intensive information
systems problem (as proxy for sponsor)
•
Interface to representative M&S tools (e.g., OPNET)
Rapid evolution in recent years (esp. during 2010-2011)
UPDM Profile: Top Level Structure
UPDM with SysML‐based ParametricsExtended & Improved OV‐4 Model for RT24 (prepared by GIT)
Model Structure (schema)
Instances: Nested Views
Instances: DNA Signature View
Model structure statistics: 24 blocks (including generalized org. unit)Instance statistics: 4 org. unit levels = 1 corporation (ACME)
with 1 HQ and 2 offices (16 org units & 51 people)
ACME News Corp.- 17 org units- 51 people
Atlanta HQ- 5 org units- 22 people
LA Office- 5 org units- 16 people
London Office- 6 org units- 13 people
- 17 equations- 68 variables
