Rpms Phase 1

7/17/2019 Rpms Phase 1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rpms-phase-1-568e4f386ab0f 1/42

Key Changes in

RPMS Guidelines



DETERMINING THE OVERALL RATING FORACCOMPLISHMENTS

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding

3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory

1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory

below 1.499 Poor



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

CSC’s Reised P!li"ies !n #he S#$a#egi"Pe$%!$&an"e Manage&en# Sys#e& 'SPMS(MC ) s* +,-+

NUMERICAL

RATING

ADJECTIVAL

RATING DESCRIPTIN ! MEANING ! RATING

5 Outstanding Performance represents an extraordinary level of achievement and

commitment in terms of quality and time, technical skills and

knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and initiative !mployees at this

performance level should have demonstrated exceptional "o#

mastery in all ma"or areas of responsi#ility !mployee achievement

and contri#utions to the organi$ation are of marked excellence

% Very Satisfactory Performance exceeded expectations &ll goals, o#"ectives and

targets were achieved a#ove the esta#lished standards

' Satisfactory Performance met expectations in terms of quality of work,

efficiency and timeliness (he most critical annual goals were met

) Unsatisfactory Performance failed to meet expectations, and*or one or more of the

most critical goals were not met

+ Poor Performance was consistently #elow expectations, and*or

reasona#le progress toward critical goals was not made

Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas

From 130% to 100% Outstanding Rating



COMP.TING THE SCORE PER KRA

T"e #$o%e &e% 'RA #"(ll be $o)&*+e, *#-/ +"e

ollow-/ o%)*l(

ating per -& . /eight x ating

(otal*0inal ating . -&+ 1 -&) 1 -&' 1 -& %

2Plus 0actor3



OTHER CHANGES

ationale 4aintained

Scope of Policy 4aintained

efinition of (erms and &cronyms E"($e,

Policy Statement 4aintained

Performance 6ycle Process 4aintained

Uses of Performance atings C"(/e, %o) 130 +o 100

4onitoring and !valuation 4aintained

epealing 6lause C"(/e, PMT G%-e($e6D-#7*(l--$(+-o6 S($+-o8

0orms C"(/e,

!ffectivity Moe, +o 2015



G*-,el-e# (&&%oe, b CSC oDe$e)be% 2014.

De&E, De&(%+)e+ %,e% No. 26#e%-e# o 2015 #-/e, !eb%*(% :6

2015.

For 2014, the agency will still use PASAG to

evaluate performance.



Phase -/ Pe$%!$&an"ePlanning and

C!&&i#&en#



;"(+ -# +"e ,e--+-o o 'RA#<

KRAs define the areas in which an

employee is expected to focus his/herefforts.



Alw(# %e)e)be% +"(+ 'RA# "(e +"e

ollow-/ $"(%($+e%-#+-$#

+ 7um#er #etween ' to 5

) escri#e in few words

' /ithin your influence

% Support departmental goals

5 Similar for "o#s that are similar

8 oes not change unless your "o#

changes



;"(+ -# +"e ,e--+-o o

b=e$+-e#<

Objectives are the specific things you need

to do, to achieve the results you want.



Pe%o%)($e I,-$(+o%#9 (hey are !:&6( ;U&7(<0<6&(<O7 O0 O=>!6(<V!S

9<t is an assessment tool that gauges whether aperformance is good or #ad

9 &gree on accepta#le tracking sources



SMART CRITERIA FOR O01ECTIVES



3. D-#$*## Co)&e+e$-e# Re7*-%e,

(, A,,-+-o(l Co)&e+e$-e#

Nee,e,



9 (he P4S looks not only at results,

#ut >; they are accomplished

9 6ompetencies help achieve results

9 6ompetencies support and influence

the ep!d?s culture

9 0or ep!d, competencies will #e

used for development purposes

2captured in the form3

;" ,o we "(e Co)&e+e$-e#<



S+( Te($"-/?%el(+e, Co)&e+e$-e#

C!$e0ehai!$al

C!&2e#en"ies

• Self

Management• Professionalis

m and ethics• Results focus•

Teamwork• Service

Orientation• Innovation

S#a3 C!$eS4ills

•Oral

Communication

• WrittenCommunicati

on• Computer/IC T Skills



4. Re($"-/ A/%ee)e+

Once the form is completed @

'RA# @ b=e$+-e# @ Pe%o%)($e I,-$(+o%# @

Co)&e+e$-e#

+ ater schedules a meeting with atee

) &gree on the listed -&s, O#"ectives, Performance

<ndicators and assigned /eight per -&

' /here to focus on the 6ompetencies



R(+e% (, R(+ee (/%ee o

+"e 'e Re#*l+ A%e(#

'RA#86 b=e$+-e#,Pe%o%)($e I,-$(+o%# (,

(##-/ ;e-/"+ Pe% 'RA (,

#-/ +"e Pe%o%)($eCo))-+)e+ (, Re-ew

!o%) PCR!8.



MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINEWeight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

(Quality,

Efficiency,

Timeliness)

Provision of Quality

Basic EducationServices

Curriculum &

LearningManagement

To craft 3 localized

and indigenizedcurricula and

instructions by15

December 2015.

July –

December2015

10% Q = 3 curricula

and instructionsE = 3 drafts of

each proposed

curriculum and

instruction

T = 1st draft / 31

Aug 2015; 2nd

draft / 30 Oct

2015; 3rdand final

draft / 15 Dec

2015



, II, III



Teacher I, II, III

T h IIIIII



Major Final Outputs

(MFOs)

Key Result Areas

(KRAs)

Objectives Outputs

Basic Education

Services

1.Teaching-Learning

Process

a. Prepared lesson plans and

daily logs of activities

including appropriate,

adequate and updated

instructional materials

b. Facilitated learning in the

elementary and secondary

schools through functionallessons plans, daily logs

and innovative teaching

strategies

c. Initiated discipline of

students including

classroom rules, guidelines

and individual and group

tasks

d. Monitored attendance,

diversity appreciation, safe,

positive and motivating

environment, overall

a. Daily Lesson Plan and

Instructional materials

b. Functional lesson plans,

daily logs, teaching

strategies

c. Class Rules and well-

behaved pupils

d. Positive/productive/safe

learning environment

Teacher I, II, III



Major Final Outputs

(MFOs)

Key Result Areas

(KRAs)

Objectives

Outputs

1.Pupils/Students

Outcomes

a.Monitored and

evaluated and

maintained pupils/

students’ progress

b.Conducted

remediation/enrichment programs to

improve

performance

indicators

c.Maintained updated

pupils/students’

school records

d.Attained the

required GSA for

a. Complete and

accurate class

record

b.

Remediation/enrich

ment programsconducted

c. Updated

pupils/students’

school records

d. Students’

mastery of the

required learning

ompetencies per

1 C it C d td PTA



1.Community

Involvement

a.Conducted

regular/periodic PTA

meetings/conferences

b.Visited parents of

students needingacademic

monitoring/follow-up

c.Undertaken/initiated

projects/events/activitie

s with external

funding/sponsorship

a. PTA

meetings/conferences

organized

b. Academic

monitoring/follow-up

c.

Projects/events/activiti

es initiated/undertaken

1.Professional Growth

and Development

a. Participated in activities such

as teachers’ association, etc.

b. Produced publications/creative

work for school paper/division

publication

c. Received special

awards/citation/recognition for

exemplary performance

b. Professional

membership and/or

community linkages

c. Published work

1.Action Research Conducted Action Research a. Action research

Specific problems in



Master Teacher I, II, III



Head Teacher I - VI

Rpms Phase 1

Documents

Transcript of Rpms Phase 1