Rosewood Hotels and Resorts: Branding to increase Customer Profitability and Lifetime Value
Rosewood Hotels & Resorts-The Case Study
-
Upload
nilav-patro -
Category
Business
-
view
390 -
download
6
Transcript of Rosewood Hotels & Resorts-The Case Study
Rosewood Hotels & Resorts
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
Company ProfileHeadquartered in Dallas, Texas
Established in 1979 by the Caroline Rose Hunt Trust Estate
BACKGROUNDFirst hotel
managed:The Mansion on Turtle
Creek,1980
Old mansion in Dallas rescued from demolition by Mrs.
Hunt
Company ability to creating unique, one-of-a-
kind properties
2003, Rosewood had 12 hotels worldwide, with a total capacity of 1,513
rooms
Pricing:$120 for one of the Saudi Arabian properties to
$9,000 for a Canadian lodge
Objectives of this case
Determining issues for the company
OBJECTIVE-1
ROSEWOOD
OBJECTIVE-2
Determine Competition in the specific hotels & resortsindustry
OBJECTIVE-3
Philosophy of Rosewood
OBJECTIVE-4
Strategies & Decisions Undertaken
Caroline Rose Hunt: Honorary Chairman
Philip Maritz: Chairman of the board
John Scott: President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert Boulogne: Chief Operating Officer
James McBride: Managing Director of The Carlyle, New York
The Main Players
The Objective Operating as a “collection” of unique properties, each with
its own name or brand,
Unlike the corporate brand model, in which luxury tended to follow a “Canned and Cookie cutter” approach across properties
OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
Fall in the number!!
REASONS FOR THE FALL
Issue 1:
Scott recognized that the Rosewood brand had
Low recognition and Brand-wide usage among guests and was an untapped
asset.
ISSUES
Issue 2:
Emphasis on individual property brands was not working from a number of fronts.
Guests not making the connection and Low Brand Visibility.
Issue 3:Brand Positioning• Philip Maritz questioned Rosewood’s individual branding positioning
• Intense competition in the luxury hotel segment,
• and Current brand posititioning limiting the market
Source: Rosewood Hotels & Resorts
Competition Analysis
High Competition!!
2 groups of luxury hotels: 1. Corporate branded Ritz-Carlton, Four Seasons, St. Regis, One&Only, and Mandarin Oriental hotels.
2. “Collections” of individually branded unique hotels, such as Auberge, RockResorts, and Orient-Express.
The Competition
Better Performance than its competitors
But other parameters!!
The Philosophy Concept of “A Sense of Place®”
Design to Service to Programming, tailoring each property experience to what is special about a given location, architecture, history, and culture
The Strategic Journey Original (1990’s) collection growth strategy was two-fold
Convert existing iconic, luxury hotels with strong
brand equity Creating brand equity in the property itself
(A)Majority of consumers did not know the brand
(B)Few who did had learned the name Rosewood from their travel agents
Insights of 2003 report from Strategic Marketing Solutions
Decisions
Undertaken
DECISION 1: Switching to an automated data-gathering through its central reservation system (CRS), and was creating one global, flexible data warehouse for all its hotels.
AIMTo expand the customer preference and profitability program across the entire brand
Decision 2:
Scott and Boulogne believed in:
Adopting a corporate branding approach,
AIM Create guest connection with Rosewood properties
Encourage multi-property guest stays
Creating Brand’s lifetime value
Case Study:
AmanResorts model
What is AmanResorts Model? A luxury resort hotel management company with corporate-branded
properties located in remote natural settings
Nicknamed its core followers “Aman Junkies,” prided themselves on collecting Aman experiences
Aman resorts sold the promise of pure, unadulterated quiet
A New Brand Strategy to Build Customer Lifetime Value
STRATEGY PROJECTIONS
A spreadsheet model that projected Rosewood’s brand-wide customer lifetime value (CLTV) developed, using nine financial and operational input variables related to rooms, guests, and marketing and acquisition costs.
Source: Rosewood Hotels & Resorts
Impact of corporate branding strategy the initial analysis & the following working assumptions:
1. The number of multi-property guest stays was anticipated to double to 10% from the 5% rate the company experienced during the previous year, raising the average number of visits per year per guest from 1.2 to 1.3, inflating the total number of repeat guests
2. The overall total number of unique guests was kept constant at 115,000.
3. A marketing and operations investment of $1 million per year necessary to implement the corporate branding strategy.
Scott had high hopes for Rosewood:
“I want to emulate the AmanResorts model and develop ‘Rosewood junkies’ who will seek out Rosewood properties exclusively.”
Rosewood’s Brand-wide Customer Lifetime Value Spreadsheet Model
Without Rosewood Branding With Rosewood Corporate Branding
Total number of unique guests 115,000 115,000Average daily spend $750 $750Number of days average guest stays 2 2Average gross margin per room 32% 32%Average number of visits per year per guest 1.2 1.3Average marketing expense per guest $130 To be calculatedAverage new guest acquisition expense $150 $150Total number of repeat guests e 19,169 To be calculatedTotal number of multiproperty stay guests 5,750 To be calculatedAverage Guest Retention Rate 16.67% To be calculatedAverage Gross Profit per Guest To be calculated To be calculated
THE SPREADSHEET SHOWS THE GROWTH OF THE BRAND THROUGH THE NEW STRATEGY!!