Root Cause Tutorial 2013. 1 Page 1 More on Hazard Identification Techniques 1.Identify potential...
-
Upload
elfreda-berry -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Root Cause Tutorial 2013. 1 Page 1 More on Hazard Identification Techniques 1.Identify potential...
Root Cause Tutorial
2013
2 Page 2
More on Hazard Identification Techniques
1. Identify potential hazards that could threaten the safety of your employees, customers, passengers, company facilities, company assets, customer property.
2. Rank the severity of hazards.
3. Identify current control measures.
4. Evaluate the effectiveness of each control measure.
5. Identify additional control measures.
One example of a system to proactively identify hazards is to establish groups to identify safety hazards by following five simple steps:
3 Page 3
Hazard Identification Program: Assess & Rank
Assess The Risk
Critically assess the risk associated with the hazard.
Factors to consider are the likelihood of the occurrence and the severity of the consequences.
4 Page 4
Hazard Identification Program: Hazard Controls
Identify The Hazard Control
Once the hazards are identified and the associated risk approximately ranked, hazard controls should be identified. The following illustrate how a hazard can be controlled.
– To prevent an unoccupied vehicle from rolling into an aircraft: Require all vehicles to be chocked, with the parking brake applied and in placed in “Park.”
– To prevent a fire at the fuel farm: “No Smoking” signs, routine inspections for electrical connections, leaks and debris, an effective foam suppression system, an emergency shutoff system, fire extinguisher, etc.
– Hazards identified at a particular airport: Ensure that operating procedures are properly documented and implemented.
5 Page 5
Hazard Identification Program
Evaluate The Hazard Controls
The appropriateness of the hazard control should be assessed.
– How effective is the hazard control?
– Does it prevent the occurrence (e.g., does it remove the hazard and eliminate or minimize the risk), or does it minimize the likelihood or the consequence?
– A control, once implemented, must be evaluated to ensure it minimizes the hazard and likelihood of occurrence.
– Example: Fire extinguishers are placed onboard an aircraft. Is the crew trained on their use and are the fire extinguishers properly maintained?
6 Page 6
Hazard Identification Program
Identify the need for hazard elimination, avoidance, or for further controls.
Each hazard and its control(s) should be critically examined to determine whether the associated risk is appropriately managed or controlled.
– If it is, the operation may continue.
– If not, improve the hazard control, or remove or avoid the hazard.
In some instances, a range of solutions to a risk may be available.
– Some may be engineering solutions (e.g., redesign), which are generally the most effective, but can be expensive.
– Others involve control (e.g., operating procedures) and personnel (e.g., training) and may be less costly. A balance must be found between the cost and practicality of the various solutions.
7 Page 7
Safety Risk Management & Safety Assurance Process
System/Task Analysis (5.1)
Identify Hazards (5.2)
Analyze Safety Risk (5.3)
Control/Mitigate Safety
Risk (5.5)
Assess Safety Risk (5.4)
Nonconformity
Preventive/Corrective Action (6.5)
Production/ Operational
System
System Assessment
(6.4)
Potential New Hazardor
Ineffective Control
Conformity
Sa
fety
As
su
ran
ce
Sa
f ety
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t
Information Acquisition 6.3
Investigation (6.2.5)
Auditing (6.2.2, 6.2.3,
6.2.4)
Continuous Monitoring
(6.2.1)
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Analysis of Data/
Information (6.3)
Oversight Involvement? NoYesSend to
Oversight
Employee Reporting & Feedback
(6.2.6)
8 Page 8
Root Cause Analysis: IntroductionRoot Cause Analysis: Introduction
Fatigue origin of the failed tail rotor drive shaft coupling
ROOT CAUSE
9 Page 9
Root Cause Analysis
Root Cause: The most basic reason for an undesirable condition or problem which, if eliminated or corrected, would have prevented it from existing or occurring.
Wilson, Dell, and Anderson (1993), “Root Cause Analysis.”
Decision-Makers
Line Management
Organizational Preconditions, i.e., Company CultureLine Activities
10 Page 10
Root Cause Analysis
Wilson, Dell, and Anderson (1993), “Root Cause Analysis.”
Problem or Unwanted
Event Occurrence
Symptoms
Apparent Cause
Root Cause
Problem or Unwanted
Event Recurrence
Prevent
11 Page 11
Root Cause Analysis
There are many analytical methods and tools available for determining root
causes to unwanted occurrences and problems.
12 Page 12
Root Cause Analysis
The “5 Whys” Model
Fishbone Diagrams
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)
TapRooT® Analysis
Useful Tools for Determining Root Cause
13 Page 13
Root Cause Analysis
For efficiency and ease of use, we will discuss:
• “5 Whys”
• Fishbone Method
Suggested Tools
14 Page 14
Root Cause Analysis
1. As a group, write down the problem and describe it completely.
2. Ask why the problem occurs and write down the answer.
3. If the answer you just provided doesn't identify the root cause of the problem that you documented in step 1, ask why again and write that answer down.
4. Return to step 3 until the team is in agreement that the problem's root cause has been identified.
– This process may take fewer or more than five whys.
The “5 Whys”
15 Page 15
Root Cause Analysis: “5 Why” Example
Event: You are operating a tug that is towing a Gulfstream IV. Suddenly, the tug becomes uncontrollable, which causes the tow hitch to break and extensive damage to the aircraft nose gear results.
1. Why did the aircraft become damaged? - Because the tow bar hit the aircraft.
2. Why did the tow bar hit the aircraft? - Because the tow hitch broke.
3. Why did the tow hitch break? - Because the tug was uncontrollable.
16 Page 16
Root Cause Analysis: “5 Why” Example
4. Why did the tug become uncontrollable? - Because the aircraft was being pulled with a tug rated below 10K draw bar pull.
5. Why was a tug with a rating that was below minimum being used ? - Because the tug operator was unaware of the guidance.
6. Why wasn’t the tug operator aware of the guidance?- Because the tug operator was new and had not been trained on the guidance.- Because the operator was unaware of the guidance.
7. Why hadn’t the employee been trained?- Because there are no procedures for processing new employees.
This process can go on if it is determined, via logical progression, that additional factors have a direct bearing on the outcome.
17 Page 17
Root Cause Analysis: “5 Why” Example
As you can see from the preceding example, asking why is an extremely
simple and effective way to determine root cause.
18 Page 18
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagrams
Man(People)
Machines
Mother Nature(Environment)
Methods
Materials
Measurements
Fishbone diagrams help to identify the “6 Ms” (potential causes) that may have contributedto the undesirable condition or problem.
19 Page 19
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Method
Great brainstorming tool!
Focuses on the cause, not the symptoms.
Identifies areas that may need further investigation.
Process can be enhanced by adding “5 whys.”
20 Page 20
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagram
Aircraft is damaged
1. Draw the diagram with the issue to be studied as the fish “head.”
21 Page 21
Aircraft isdamaged
2. Label each “bone” of the fish.
ManMachineMethods
Mother Nature
Materials Measures
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagram
22 Page 22
Aircraft isDamaged
3. Through brainstorming, identify factors in each category that could affect the undesirable occurrence.
ManMachineMethods
Mother Nature
Materials Measures
Gauge
Tug
Maintenance
Tools
Rain
Training
Driving
Tow Bar
Behavior
Manuals
Wind
Speed
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagram
23 Page 23
4. Upon completion of the fishbone, analyze the results.
5. Then, list the items that were identified in
priority order.
This brainstorming technique, when properly applied, can be helpful in determining a root cause to an undesirable condition or problem.
Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagram
24 Page 24
Root Cause Analysis
Remember, the objective of root cause analysis is to identify the real cause of a problem, not the symptoms.
Hopefully, these simple tools will help you to do just that!