Rooftop Solar Energy Roundtable Presentation Final

29
Los Angeles Solar: Now and into the Future J.R. DeShazo, Director, UCLA Luskin Center for InnovaCon Manuel Pastor, Director, USC Program for Environmental and Regional Equity March 27, 2015

description

Presented at a roundtable meeting on 3/27/15 on LADWP's solar feed-in tariff program.

Transcript of Rooftop Solar Energy Roundtable Presentation Final

  • Los Angeles Solar:

    Now and into the Future

    J.R. DeShazo, Director, UCLA Luskin Center for InnovaCon Manuel Pastor, Director, USC Program for Environmental and Regional Equity

    March 27, 2015

  • 0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    Burbank W&P

    PG&E SDG&E SMUD SCE Pasadena W&P

    Riverside Public UClity

    LADWP Anaheim Public UClity

    Glendale W&P

    Wa#

    s per Customer

    Los Angeles is in boYom third of uCliCes for solar in California

    159 solar waYs per customer

  • Los Angeles remains heavily dependent on coal

    0

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    3,000

    PG & E SMUD Glendale W&P

    Burbank W&P

    Pasadena W&P

    SDG&E SCE LADWP

    Coal Cap

    acity

    (MW)

    42% of power mix

  • Clean Coalition

    1,500 MW of in-basin solar by 2025

    Clean Coalition 600 MW

    1,500 MW

    Clean Coalition

    1,200 MW

    800 MW

    2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

    LA Clean Energy CoaliCons vision for in-basin solar

  • 0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1,000

    1,200

    1,400

    1,600

    2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

    Prog

    ram Cap

    acity

    (MW)

    Scaling to 1,500 MW of in-basin solar

    2025 Goal

    900 MW of

    expanded feed-in tariff

    500 MW of net

    metering

    100 MW of municipal projects

    Feed-in Tariff

    Net Metering

    Community solar and other municipal projects

  • Governor Jerry Brown has called for 50% renewables

    by 2030

    Los Angeles following States lead

    To comply with current RPS requirements, LADWP must procure at least 75% of renewable energy from

    Category 1 RECs

    FiT, community solar and municipal projects receive Category 1 RECs NEM projects receive Category 3 RECs

  • Achieving in-basin solar goals will create local jobs

    Total job years created 35,950 Job years for large projects 17,950

    Feed-in tariff 16,155

    Community solar 718

    Other municipal projects 1,077

    Job years for small projects 18,000

    Net metering 18,000

    Note: Includes 22,950 direct job years and 13,000 indirect job years

  • remove GHGs and other pollutants

    Over 26.4 million metric tons of avoided CO2e

    Note: GHG avoided when replacing coal-fire power plant

    The equivalent to more than 5.6 million

    vehicles removed from Los Angeles

    roads

    Source: UCLA Luskin Center for InnovaCon Ratepayer Impact Model EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator

  • Nearly 39 million MWh of energy produced

    and generate clean local energy for Los Angeles homes and businesses

    Enough to power over 335,000 Los Angeles homes

    per year

    Note: Assumes 6,621 kWh average annual LADWP household electricity consumpCon (CEC, 2012)

  • Local businesses will be able to take advantage of federal tax credits

    Even if the 30% Federal Investment Tax Credit is reduced in

    2016, Los Angeles businesses can sCll leverage

    $552 million in tax credits

    Note: Assumes ITC is reduced to 10% in 2017

  • Total in-basin solar capacity:

    153.5 MW

    Net metering (NEM):

    143 MW

    93%

    Feed-in tariff (FiT):

    6.5 MW 4%

    Other in-basin solar:

    4 MW 3%

    Where are we now with installing rooiop solar in Los Angeles?

  • 1) FiT 100: Five tranches over two years

    2) FiT 50: Fiiy MW bundled with out-of-basin solar Contracts have been awarded

    LADWP has successfully allocated 150 MW of capacity with the goal of interconnecCon by the end of 2016

    Tranche 1 20 MW $0.17 Tranche 2

    20 MW $0.16

    Tranche 4 15 MW $0.14

    Tranche 3 20 MW $0.15

    Tranche 5 25 MW $0.13

    February 2013

    July 2013

    March 2014

    August 2014

    March 2015

    Note: Tranche 4 released 15 MW and Tranche 5 released 25 MW

  • Over 3,300 job years created $562.5 million invested into Los Angeles Nearly 4 million MWh of clean local energy generated 2.6 million metric tons of avoided CO2e A half million cars removed from Los Angeles roads Over 240,000 homes powered

    Benefits of the allocated 150 MW of in-basin solar

  • 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 3 Tranche 4

    Capa

    city (M

    W)

    Goal

    Private industry has responded posiCvely: Program is oversubscribed by 238%

    50 MW 250% over- subscripCon

    43 MW 215% over- subscripCon

    14 MW 7% under- subscripCon

    72 MW 360% over- subscripCon

    Offered Feb. 13 $0.17 per kWh

    Offered Aug. 14 $0.14 per kWh

    Offered March 14 $0.15 per kWh

    Offered July 13 $0.16 per kWh

    Note: In Tranche 4, large projects were over-subscribed. Small projects were undersubscribed by 94%.

  • Tranche 1 Total wait Cme: 425 days

    Tranche 2 Total wait Cme: 254 days

    Tranche 3 Total wait Cme: 182 days

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    Med

    ian Wait T

    ime (days)

    LADWP execuCng FiT contracts more quickly

  • So far, only 6.5 MW of the released 100 MW have been built with

    another 8.1 MW contracted

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Program Capacity (MW)

    However, several improvements are needed

    6.5 MW

    8.1 MW

    Tranche 1 February 13

    Tranche 2 July 13

    Tranche 3 March 14

    Tranche 4 August 14

    Tranche 5 March 15

  • But aYriCon rates are high

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 3 Tranche 4

    Capa

    city Lost (MW)

    AYriCon rates have been high

    61% of applicaCons drop out

    52% of applicaCons drop out

    41% of applicaCons drop out

    20% of applicaCons drop out

  • 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Contracted

    Cap

    acity

    (MW)

    500% Increase in SOPPA ExecuCon

    Business as Usual

    and LADWP will need to interconnect over 4 MW per month to achieve interconnecCon goals

    2016 Goal

    Note: Based on rate of SOPPA execuCons

    LADWPs current interconnecCon pace is 271 kW per month

  • FiT does advance solar related equity goals

    Training programs which frequently target less

    advantaged workers generally in or near these opportunity

    areas

    40% of all installed or acCve capacity falls within equity hot

    spots

    Equity Hot Spots are defined as census tracts in:

    BoYom 1/3 of household income and

    BoYom 1/3 high school graduaCon rate and Top 1/3 unemployment rate and/or

    Top 10% CalEnviroScreen

  • When it works . . .

    PermaCitys Forever 21 Project

    5.1 MW (Net Metering + FiT) Project in Lincoln Heights Local hiring from programs training

    disadvantaged workers

    UClized racking system manu-factured locally & invented by PermaCity

  • And how could it do more?

    Maximize the connecCon between high-need communiCes, equity opportuniCes and the FiT through codified programs and incenCves

    Examples: PrioriCze solar equity projects and incenCvize hiring disadvantaged workers

    Work with training programs to beYer arCculate and develop career pathways

  • And how could it leverage more? CalEnviroScreen is designed to

    distribute Cap and Trade proceeds clear overlap with

    equity hot spots

    A share of S.B. 535 Investment Funds can be used for energy

    efficiency goals, with priority for low-income mulC-family units

  • RecommendaCons

    1. Ask for bolstered staffing plan on which LADWP reports quarterly in order to create capacity and insCtuConal knowledge On January 2013, LADWP approved a 150 MW FiT program and requested 30 FTE from the Board of Commissioners. As of today, only 3 FTE are dedicated to the FiT as well as consulCng assistance (LADWP Board TransmiYal, 2013).

    2. Call on Board to ask LADWP Staff for a waitlist management plan including strategy to review and prioriCze waitlisted projects based on: Quality of applicaCon Projects in solar equity hot spots Economic development opportuniCes

    Hiring from high need areas/disadvantaged workers

  • RecommendaCons 3. Review Expanded FiT proposal based on

    lessons learned from FiT 100 Evaluate pricing, waitlist management, recruitment, technical assistance and other program features

    4. AcCvely encourage linkages to less advantaged workers Hiring credits for employing workers from high need areas/ disadvantaged workers; arCculate Prop. 47 opportunity; facilitate smaller projects; measure equity on Mayors dashboard

    5. Seek advice of LADWP and other stakeholders on addiConal improvements

  • Users can sort by: ZIP code City council district Property owner Property use System size

    Other announcements: A new tool from the LABC InsCtute

    Online resource to idenCfy potenCal sites for rooiop solar installaCons

    Access at hYp://solar.labcinsCtute.org

    Includes nearly 8,000 properCes

  • Thank you

    J.R. DeShazo [email protected]

    Manuel Pastor

    [email protected]

  • All FiT analysis based on Current FiT Review Priority List released March 5, 2015

    Direct investment assumes $4.56 per waY for NEM, and $3.23 per waY for FiT and community solar Also includes a 5% annual decrease in cost per waY and a 5% discount rate

    Equity hotspots include census tracts in boYom third of household income AND boYom third of high school graduaCon rates AND top third of unemployment AND/OR top 10% CalEnviroScreen score

    See next slides for job year assumpCons

    Sources and AssumpCons

  • Direct Jobs MulCpliers FTE per MW

    BOS components 3.0 System integraCon 2.8

    InstallaCon 2.1 Annual O&M 0.4

    UClity network upgrade 1.5 Program administraCon 1.5

    Total direct jobs 11.3 Note: Does not include wafer, cell and module job creaCon Source: Navigant, 2008

    Indirect Job MulCpliers FTE per MW

    Manufacturing 4.20 ConstrucCon 2.45

    Total indirect jobs 6.65

    Job Years Created for Large Projects AssumpCons

    Source: NaConal Renewable Energy Laboratory Note: Manufacturing is BOS * 1.4; ConstrucCon is system integraCon and installaCon * 0.5

  • Direct Jobs MulCpliers FTE per MW

    BOS components 3.0 System integraCon 7.8

    InstallaCon 9.2 Annual O&M 0.3

    UClity network upgrade 1.5 Program administraCon 1.5

    Total direct jobs 23.3 Note: Does not include wafer, cell and module job creaCon Source: Navigant, 2008

    Indirect Job MulCpliers FTE per MW

    Manufacturing 4.2 ConstrucCon 8.5

    Total indirect jobs 12.7

    Job Years Created for Small Projects AssumpCons

    Source: NaConal Renewable Energy Laboratory Note: Manufacturing is BOS * 1.4; ConstrucCon is system integraCon and installaCon * 0.5