Roger Pielke Jr. - #steps13
-
Upload
steps-centre -
Category
Documents
-
view
934 -
download
0
Transcript of Roger Pielke Jr. - #steps13
CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY RESEARCHCIRES/University of Colorado at Boulderhttp://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu
The Promise and Pitfalls of Science as Political Authority
Roger A. Pielke, Jr.University of Colorado
Credibility across cultures:expertise, uncertainty and the global politics of scientific advice
6 February 2013University of Sussex
slide 2
Conclusions
1. Expert advice confers great authority
2. That authority is seductive to both experts and decision makers
3. Strong institutions are necessary to preserve that authority and the advice that it brings
4. The expert community must show leadership and responsibility
slide 3
Scientific advice has deep roots …
slide 4
Andreas Georgiou, Hellenic Statistical Authority
slide 5
L’Aquila Earthquake Trial of Major Risks Committee
slide 6
David Nutt, UK Drugs Advisory Council
slide 7
Bush Administration difficulties
slide 8
Obama and Plan B Medication
slide 9
Red River Floods 1997 - Beware “messages”
slide 10
Mayor of E. Grand Forks: “I want one number”
slide 11
All politicians have interests
“But understand me correctly; at the end of the day, here in Copenhagen, we have as politicians to make the final decision… I need your assistance to push this process in the right direction, and in that respect, I need fixed targets and certain figures, and not too many considerations on uncertainty and risk and things like that.”
Anders Fogh RasmussenPrime Minister of DenmarkMarch 2009Science meeting in advance ofCopenhagen Climate Conference
slide 12
The seductive appeal of the “message”
"That [next IPCC] report is going to scare the wits out of everyone. I'm confident those scientific findings will create new political momentum.'‘
Yvo de BoerFormer head, UN FCCC7 November 2012
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/former-un-official-says-climate-report-will-shock-nations-into-action-20121106-28w5c.html
slide 13
Predistortion? US Rep. Bill Foster (D-IA)
Foster said that scientists should expect that the information that they bring to the political process, such as through testimony before congressional committees, will inevitably be "distorted" in the political process.
He then raised what he called "a difficult ethical question" -- if a scientist knows that their message will be distorted in the political process, to what degree should s/he predistort their message in hopes that what comes out the other end is a closer approximation to reality?
slide 14
Clarifying choice for effective action
slide 15
An Analogy: Where should we have dinner?
slide 16
An Analogy: Where should we have dinner?
Four Perspectives on Answering this Question
Pure scientist Science arbiter Issue advocate Honest broker of
policy alternatives
slide 17
Science Arbiter
Concierge
slide 18
"The notion that scientific advisors can or do limit themselves to addressing purely scientific issues, in particular, seems fundamentally misconceived ... the advisory process seems increasingly important as a locus for negotiating scientific differences that have political weight."
Sheila Jasanoff 1990The Fifth Branch:Science Advisors as Policymakers
Reality Check – Science as a Political Arena
slide 19
Issue Advocate
slide 20
What is the problem? Legitimacy
“We have learned that the scientist-advocate, on either side of such a debate, is likely to be more advocate than scientist and this has unfavorably altered the public view of both the nature of the scientific endeavor and the personal attributes of scientists.”
Philip Handler 1976
Handler, P., 1976. Science and hope in science: a resource for humankind. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Bicentennial Symposium, vol. 12.
President U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 1969-1981
slide 21
Honest Broker of Policy Alternatives
slide 22
Honest brokers of policy alternatives
slide 23
Conclusions
1. Expert advice confers great authority
2. That authority is seductive to both experts and decision makers
3. Strong institutions are necessary to preserve that authority and the advice that it brings
4. The expert community must show leadership and responsibility
slide 24
Thank you!
[email protected] Papers etc. can be downloaded from:
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu Weblog: http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/
2007 2010 2010