Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University
description
Transcript of Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University
![Page 1: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Rob Schoelkopf, Applied Physics, Yale University
PI’s:RSMichel DevoretLuigi Frunzio Steven Girvin Leonid Glazman
Quantum Optics in Circuit QED: From Single Photons to Schrodinger Cats….
Postdocs & grad students
wanted!
![Page 2: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Thanks to cQED Team Thru the Years!
Theory
Experiment (past)
Steve Girvin, Michel Devoret, Luigi Frunzio, Leonid Glazman
Alexandre BlaisLev BishopJay GambettaJens KochEran GinossarA. NunnenkampG. CatelaniLars TornbergTerri YuSimon NiggDong ZhouMazyar MirrahimiZaki Leghtas
Andreas WallraffDave SchusterAndrew HouckLeo DiCarloJohannes MajerBlake JohnsonJerry ChowJoe Schreier
Experiment (present)Hanhee PaikLuyan SunGerhard KirchmairMatt ReedAdam SearsBrian VlastakisEric HollandMatt ReagorAndy FragnerAndrei PetrenkoJacob BlumhoffTeresa Brecht
![Page 3: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline
• Cavity QED vs. Circuit QED
• How coherent is a Josephson junction?
• Scaling the 3D architecture
• A bit of nonlinear quantum optics
• Deterministic Schrödinger cat creation
![Page 4: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED)
2g = vacuum Rabi freq.k = cavity decay rateg = “transverse” decay rate
† †12
ˆ ( )( ) ˆ2a
zr a a a agH H Hk g
Quantized Field Electric dipole Interaction
2-level system
Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian
Strong Coupling = g > k , g
Dissipation
![Page 5: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2012: Year of Quantum Measurement"for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable
measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems"
Serge Haroche (ENS/Paris)Cavity QED
w/ Rydberg atoms
Dave Wineland (NIST-Boulder)Quantum jumpsw/ trapped ions
![Page 6: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Josephson-junctionqubits7 GHz in
outtransmissionline “cavity”
Thy: Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A (2004)
Qubits Coupled with a Quantum Bus
“Circuit QED”
use microwave photons guided on wires!
![Page 7: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Superconducting Qubits
nonlinearity from Josephson junction
(dissipationless)electromagnetic oscillator 01 ~ 5 10 GHz
See reviews: Devoret and Martinis, 2004; Wilhelm and Clarke, 2008
Ener
gy
0
101
1201 12 Superconductor
Superconductor (Al)
Insulating barrier1 nm
• Engineerable spectrum• Lithographically produced features• Each qubit is an “individual”• Decoherence mechanisms?
CCj
Lj
Transmon
![Page 8: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
5 mm
Vacuum fields: mode volumezero-point energy density enhanced by
Transition dipole:0 /g d E
0~ 40,000d ea
L = l ~ 2.5 cm
coaxial cable
R l
6 310 l
610
Supports a TEM modelike a coax:
Advantages of 1d Cavity and Artificial Atom
x 10 larger than Rydberg atom
![Page 9: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Vacuum fields: mode volumezero-point energy density enhanced by
Transition dipole:0 /g d E
0~ 40,000d ea6 310 l
610
Advantages of 1d Cavity and Artificial Atom
x 10 larger than Rydberg atom
1 100 MHz~ ~ 0.025 GHz
g
6~ 10g
Circuit QED
compare Rydberg atomor optical cQED:
much easier to reach strong interaction regimes!
![Page 10: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Chip for Circuit QED
Qubittrapping
easy:it’s
“soldered”down!
Nb
Nb
Si Al
Expt: Wallraff et al., Nature (2004)
![Page 11: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cavity QED: Resonant Case
r a
vacuumRabi
oscillations
“dressed state ladders”
g e
# ofphotons
qubit state
+ ,0 ,1e g
- ,0 ,1e g
(see e.g. “Exploring the Quantum…,” S. Haroche & J.-M. Raimond)
“phobit”
“quton”
![Page 12: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Strong Resonant Coupling: Vacuum Rabi Splitting
Review: RS and S.M. Girvin, Nature 451, 664 (2008).Nonlinear behavior: Bishop et al., Nature Physics (2009).
2g ~ 350 MHz
Can achieve “Fine-Structure Limit”
6.75 6.85 6.95 7.05
25 9~ ~ 10 10g
kgCooperativity:
g >> [k, g]
200 MHz~ ~ ~ 0.045 GHz r
g
ra
![Page 13: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
But does it “compute”?
Algorithms: DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2009).
![Page 14: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1 ns resolution
cavity: “entanglement bus,” driver, & detector
transmon qubits
DC - 2 GHz
A Two-Qubit Processor
T = 10 mK
![Page 15: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
General Features of a Quantum Algorithm
Qubitregister
Workingqubits
M
createsuperposition
encode functionin a unitary
processinitialize measure
will involve entanglementbetween qubits
Maintain quantum coherence
1) Start in superposition: all values at once!2) Build complex transformation out of one-qubit and two-qubit “gates”3) Somehow* make the answer we want result in a definite state at end!
*use interference: the magic of the properly designed algorithm
![Page 16: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Total pulse sequence:104 nanoseconds
Coherence time ~ 1 ms
The correct answer is found
>80% of the time!
ideal 10 Grover Algorithm Step-by-Step
Previously implemented in NMR: Chuang et al., 1998Ion traps: Brickman et al., 2003Linear optics: Kwiat et al., 2000
![Page 17: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Will it ever scale?
or,
“Come on, how coherent could this squalid-state thing ever really get?”
(H. Paik et al., PRL, 2011)
![Page 18: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Progress in Superconducting Charge Qubits
Similar plots can probably be made for phase, flux qubits
Schoelkopf’s Law:Coherence increases 10x every 3 years!
![Page 19: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Materials: Dirt Happens!Qubit: two 200 x 300 nm junctions
Rn~ 3.5 kOhmsIc ~ 40 nA
Current Density ~ 30- 40 A/cm2
Dolan Bridge TechniquePMMA/MAA bilayerAl/AlOx/Al
![Page 20: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Why Surfaces Matter…
Increase spacings decreases energy on surfaces
increases Q Gao et al. 2008 (Caltech)O’Connell et al. 2008 (UCSB)Wang et al. 2009 (UCSB)
as shown in:
+ + --E d
-Al2O3
Nb
“participation ratio” = fraction of energy stored in material
even a thin (few nanometer) surface layer will store ~ 1/1000 of the energy
5 mm
If surface loss tangent is poor ( tand ~ 10-2) would limit Q ~ 105
![Page 21: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
One Way to Be Insensitive to Surfaces…3-D waveguide cavity
machined from aluminum(6061-T6, Tc ~ 1.2 K)
TE101 fundamental mode
50 mm
Observed Q’s to 5 MIncreased mode volume
decreases surface effects!
cav 100T sm
![Page 22: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Transmon Qubit in 3D Cavity
50 mm
~ mm
g 100 MHz
Still has same net coupling! Smaller fields compensated by larger dipole
Vacuum capacitor
![Page 23: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
-50
0
50
Sig
nal (
a.u.
)
20151050Delay Time (ms)
-50
0
50
Sig
nal (
a.u.
)
20151050Delay Time (ms)
100
50
0
T1 S
igna
l (a.
u.)
4003002001000Delay Time (ms)
T1 = 60 ms
T2 = 14 msmeas.
p/2 p/2Dtp/2
Coherence Dramatically ImprovedDt
p
Dtp/2/2p/2 p/2p Dtp/2/2Techo = 25 ms
61 2 10Q T
![Page 24: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Ramsey Experiment/Hahn Echo
T2echo = 145 ms
![Page 25: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Remarkable Frequency Stability
f01 = 6 808 737 605 (608) Hz
No change in Hamiltonian parameters > 80 ppb in 12 hours!?
608 Hzf
Overall precision after 12 hours: ~ 19 Hz or 3 ppb
![Page 26: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Charge Qubit Coherence, Revised
QEC limit?
Schoelkopf’s law 10x every 3 years!
![Page 27: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Ringdown of TE011
Fit (Black):τ = 3.7msQL=ωτ=265M
Milliseconds and Beyond?
M. Reagor et. al. to be published
Now this is aQuantum Memory for qubits!!
0.6 Billion
E
best qubits
![Page 28: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Building Blocks for ScalingOne AtomOne Cavity
Two AtomsOne Cavity
One AtomTwo Cavities
Many AtomsMany Cavities
![Page 29: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Two-Cavity Design
45mm
1.2mm
900μm Al2O3
500nm
![Page 30: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Strong dispersive limit:QND measurement of single photons
Algorithms: DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2009).
![Page 31: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Dispersive Limit of cQED
cavity
qubit
2 242
rE n
g n
D
Diagonalizing J-C Hamilt.:
r a D
Dispersive (D>>g): 24 3
, ,0
2 ( / )rg n g
gE E n O g
D D
2g
D,0 ,1e g
“phobit”
,0 ,1e g “quton”
![Page 32: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
reff† †
2 a z za a a aH
Strong Dispersive Hamiltonian:
n=0
n=1
n=0
n=1
n=2
n=2
Photon Numbersplitting
2~ 0n
~ 0.5n
~ 1n
0n1n2n
Qubit Frequency (GHz)
2
~ ,g g kD
qubi
t abs
orpt
ion
“doubly-QND” interaction
![Page 33: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
QND Measurement of Photon Number
nXp
“Got any ‘s?1n
Quantum “go-fish”
gg e
cavity
qubit2) then measure qubit state using second cavity
1) perform n-dependent flip of qubitRepeated QND of n=0 or n=1:B. Johnson, Nature Phys., 2010
“Click!”
![Page 34: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Coherent Displacementscreate
![Page 35: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Coherent Displacements
![Page 36: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Using a cavity as a memory:Schrodinger cats on demandexperiment theoryG. Kirchmair M. MirrahimiB. Vlastakis Z. Leghtas
“No, no mini-Me, we don’t freeze our kitty!”
![Page 37: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Driving a Quantum Harmonic OscillatorGiving a classical ‘drive’ to a quantum system:
Where:
with
Our state is described by two continuous variables, an amplitude and phase.A ‘coherent’ state.
Phase-space portrait of oscillator state:
x̂
p̂
ˆ cos( )
ˆ sin( )
x
p
![Page 38: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
What’s a Coherent State?
E
x
x
2 / 2x mD Glauber (coherent) state
2E
0t
maxx x D
![Page 39: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What’s a Coherent State?
E
x
x
2Glauber (coherent) state
2E
2t p
![Page 40: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
What’s a Coherent State?
E
x
x
2Glauber (coherent) state
2E
t p
![Page 41: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Measured Q functions of a Coherent State
21( , )Q e p
D D
nXp gg e
![Page 42: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • •
![Page 43: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 44: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • •
cavity transmission
5nspulse
•
![Page 45: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 46: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 47: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 48: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 49: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Deterministic Cat Creation
cavity
qubit
• • • •
![Page 50: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
So, What’s a Cat State?
E
x
x
2Schrödinger cat state
2E
0t
/ 2x mD
12
2D x DSuperposition with distinguishability, D
![Page 51: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
So, What’s a Cat State?
E
x
x
2Schrödinger cat state
2E
/ 2x mD
12
2t p
What happens now, when packets collide?
![Page 52: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Seeing the Interference: Wigner Function
Parity
Thy:
Negative fringes =“whiskers”
Expt’l. Wigner tomography: Leibfried et al., 1996 ion traps (NIST)Haroche/Raimond , 2008 Rydberg (ENS)Hofheinz et al., 2009 in circuits (UCSB)
![Page 53: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Seeing the Interference: Wigner FunctionDcavity 1
cavity 2
qubit q wait Xp/2
mapXp/2
measurement
![Page 54: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Wigner Function: Interpretation
x
2 / 2x mD
![Page 55: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Wigner Function: Interpretation
x
2 / 2x mD
2t p
![Page 56: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Fringes for different cat sizes
![Page 57: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Creating Curious Cats
State used for a
protected memory
multicomponent interference fringesZ. Leghtas ,M. Mirrahimi et.al. arXiv. 1207.0679
(2012)
![Page 58: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
“Bulldog State?” Y
Curiouser and Curiouser…
![Page 59: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
So Now What?
“Age of Coherence”
“Age of Entanglement”
“Age of Measurement.”
“Age of Qu. Feedback.”
“Age of Qu. Error Correction.”
![Page 60: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
So Now What?• Coherence won’t be the reason it doesn’t work…
• In next few years, we will be building non-trivial (i.e. non-calculable) quantum systems from the “bottom-up”
• Beginning era of “active” quantum devices – incorporating: – quantum feedback – quantum error-correction – engineered dissipation
• Advent of analog quantum simulations and artificial many-body physics?
• What (if any?) are the medium-term applications of quantum information technology?
![Page 61: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Error Correction with Minimal HardwareLeghtas, Mirrahimi, et al., arXiv 1207:0679
also known as a Zurek “compass state”
Then photon loss can be monitored/corrected by repeated photon parity measurement using qubit
0 ( )L C N
1 ( )L i i i C N10e eg Lg Lc cc c
• Correction for a single bit / phase flip: at least 5 qubits• A single cavity mode: infinite dimensional Hilbert Space• Minimal QEC hardware: a single cavity mode coupled to a qubit
Idea: encode a qubit in a 4 component parity state
![Page 62: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Numerical simulations
2p
40 MHz, T1,qubit T2,qubit 100ms, Tcav 2 ms, 2 4.
![Page 63: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Circuit QED Team Members 2012
KevinChouHanhee
Paik
BrianVlastakis
JacobBlumhoff
LuyanSun
LuigiFrunzio
MattReed
SteveGirvin
AndreiPetrenko
Funding:
AdamSears
Eric Holland
TeresaBrecht
NissimOfek
AndreasFragner
MichelDevoret
MattReagor
GerhardKirchmair
LeonidGlazman
Z. Leghtas M. Mirrahimi
![Page 64: Rob Schoelkopf , Applied Physics, Yale University](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816936550346895de096ed/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Summary
• We won’t be able to use coherence as an excuse anymore!Qubits: T2 ~ 2*T1 ~ 0.0001 secCavities: T1 ~ 0.01 sec
• 3D approach has led to 2+ orders of magnitude improvements!
Paik et al., PRL 107, 240501 (2011).
• New physics: single-photon Kerr and dispersive revivals
• New approaches: cats in cavities as logical qubits!
Kirchmair, Vlastakis et al., in preparation.
Leghtas, Mirrahimi et al., ArXiv:1205.2401 and ArXiv:1207.0679