Rob Gill - Plans to Reality Froum -
-
Upload
field-furthering-inclusive-learning-and-development -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
384 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Rob Gill - Plans to Reality Froum -
Better lives through innovative planning and budgeting: the role of Individualised Funding (IF)
Rob GillBusiness Development and Support Manager
Structure of presentation
Introduction – what’s all the fuss about natural supports?
Recent changes to disability services in New ZealandIndividualised Funding (IF) – putting people in the centreThe evidence in favour of IF
Discussion & Questions
Te Pou’s role and key relationships
Natural Supports - a youngster resting with Mum
NZ disability service reform timeline
1990s Reforms began with closures of institutions2001 Long-term support systems focus on the person2003 The ‘Ordinary Life Report’ reveals poor outcomes2005 Individualised Funding appears formally as a pilot project2006 The era of large institutions ends2009 A new model is approved incorporating IF
Te Pou becomes NZ’s disability workforce centre2010 An IF market is established with 12 providers2011 The 2nd Canterbury earthquake (IF arrangements are durable)2011 ‘sleep-over’ case minimum wage ruling in the Supreme Court
Business case for IF
Issue – service quality is elusive in spite of regulations Cause – Funding ‘buckets’ are seen to be too rigidly tied to specific purposes and contracting too focused on the service provided rather than meeting genuine needs and producing improved services (MOH, 2009, p.48) Need – new services that deliver value to consumers, providers and tax payers. Solution - Individual “budgets hand control to service users and give them the flexibility to tailor care to meet their specific needs (Alakeson, 2008, British Medical Journal)
Stage One = assessment and choice
Stage Two – negotiation and delivery
Stage Three – verification, invoicing and payment
NZ IF snapshot
began in Christchurch in late 1990s only one provider from 2005 to July 2010 IF is offered nationally from 2007 IF numbers have quadrupled since in the past 2 years Two of 12 providers offer national coverage about 1000 people currently use IF satisfaction is very high (90+% on average)
NZ IF criteria in brief The applicant (or their agent) must be willing and able to
manage the budget there is no minimum or maximum threshold for funding the budget holder must agree to certain responsibilities and
obligations
What are the various labels for IF? Personalisation is used some countries (usually in mental
health)
In Australia – individualised support packages, direct payments
In the UK – individualised budgets, direct payments
In the USA & Canada – service vouchers, self-directed care, brokered support, cash and counselling
What is IF? A flexible funding allocation method based on need Control of funding transfers to the eligible person All funding is managed by the person (or their appointed
agent)
What are the guiding principles of IF?
Values = person-centred support and personalisation
social model of disabilitychoice, flexibility and regular reviewsaccessible tailored supportinformed decision makingservice users determine their own level of supportindividual plans are used as tools to negotiate individual budgetsplanning is undertaken with an independent facilitator individual needs assessments determine funding packages
What is individualised funding usually used for? home based support services (not usually residential) legitimate services that meet agreed needs services that help people to experience quality of life
Real examples1. Three adolescent men who wanted to remain living as
flatmates2. Pre-school brothers with ASD3. A Maori woman living rurally with chronic health conditions4. A young man who lives for rugby5. A senior manager who travels frequently
How does individualised funding work? disabled people describe what they want to achieve objectives are agreed that matter to each person personal packages of care are linked to agreed objectives tailored, responsive and flexible support is available services are ‘ordered’ by the person service delivery is verified payment is claimed employees or suppliers are paid
Average IF packages (hours per week) as at April 2011
Small: up to 20 10 $13,000
Medium: 21-45 29 $37,700
Large: 46 or more 63 $81,900
What help do budget holders need? accessible information training - essential skills (e.g. communication and
negotiation) assistance with financial and employment responsibilities Introductions to other budget holders learning and development support (in the good and bad
times)
What responsibilities do budget holders accept? Employing, contracting or purchasing services being a good employer or giving clear instructions as a
client tax compliance budget management health and safety (for themselves and others) emergency planning
How does society benefit from IF? ‘market’ forces cause the ‘system’ to be more flexible service users experience better health and quality of life participation in paid work or study improves socioeconomic status improves opportunities to build leadership capability scarce funding is used more effectively social care budgets are better managed
Statistically significant improvements in mental health and physical health were reported for IF budget holders in NSW (Fisher & Campbell-McLean, 2008)
Why do these benefits arise? pay and conditions for support workers improve staff turnover reduces workers are strongly commitment to individual service users support arrangements offer flexibility
A youngster ready to go again!
Closing questions and comments
Service reform might seem like someone else's businessbut you can make a powerful difference for good!
Thank you for your participation