Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
-
Upload
james-barlow -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
1/62
The Road CasualtyReview 2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
2/62
The Road Casualty Review 2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
3/62
i
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Contents
Section 1 - Service Assessment Page
1.0 Forward 1
2.0 Acknowledgement 2
3.0 Introduction 3
4.0 Background 4
5.0 Targets 5
6.0 Progress Towards Targets 6
7.0 Interpretation of Results 9
8.0 Partnerships 12
9.0 Priority Areas for Action 14
Section 2 - The Casualty Report 15
10.0 Summary of 2005 Casualty Figures 15
11.0 Casualties by Severity 15
12.0 Casualties by Route 16
13.0 Casualties by Area Deprivation 18
14.0 Casualties by Other Factors 19
15.0 Casualties by Age and User Group 21
16.0 Specific Road User Group Analysis 24
Section 3 - Directory 44
17.0 Road Safety Economics 44
18.0 Glossary of Terms 45
19.0 Charges for Providing Road Accident Information 46
20.0 Road Safety Organisations Contact Details 47
List of Injury Accident Cluster Sites for 2004 - 2006 49
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
4/62
ii
The Road Casualty Review 2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
5/62
1
The Road Casualty Review 2006
1.0 Foreword
1.1 Bristol City Council is committed to making ourroads safer for everyone and to encouragingchoice in travelling round the city. Improvingsafety and reducing the number of accidents onBristols roads is a high priority within ourintegrated transport strategy and also withinthe Joint Local Transport Plan.
1.2 In the year 2006, over 1,800 people were injuredon Bristols roads and we recognise that all of
these accidents cause human suffering. Wesupport the Governments casualty reductiontargets set out in their road safety strategyTomorrows Roads: Safer for Everyone byworking to reduce road deaths and injuries,especially concentrating on improving thesafety of children.
1.3 This document reports on the progress we have
made towards targets set out in the CityCouncils Road Safety Strategy. Workingtogether, and with the support of government,the police, schools, voluntary groups andindividual road users (pedestrians, cyclists,motorcyclists and drivers) we can all play ourpart in making Bristol a safer city for everyone.
SECTION 1 - SERVICE ASSESSMENT
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
6/62
2.1 Bristol City Council is grateful to officers andstaff of the Avon & Somerset Constabularywho attended the road accidents and collectthe data which is presented here. Since thedata is collected by Avon & SomersetConstabulary, its accuracy cannot beguaranteed by the City Council.
2.2 The City Council is also grateful to AtkinsHighways and Transportation staff who
process the data for the Department forTransport (DfT) on behalf of the highwayauthority and provide records for the BristolCity Council road casualty database.
2
The Road Casualty Review 2006
2.0 Acknowledgment
http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
7/62
3.1 Road Safety is an issue that concerns everyperson in Bristol. Every resident and visitoruses the Citys transport infrastructure tosome extent, whether as a pedestrian, rider,passenger or driver. Safety on the transportsystem is paramount for all users. Thiscommitment is documented within the RoadSafety Strategy contained within the JointLocal Transport Plan which was published inMarch 2006.
3.2 The provision of a road safety service is astatutory duty of local highway authorities inGreat Britain. Bristol City Council has theduty of promoting road safety in Bristol onall roads. The City Council also hasresponsibility for traffic management andmaintenance on all roads except trunk roadsand motorways (M32, M49, M5 and part ofthe A4) which are the responsibility of theHighways Agency.
3.3 The purpose of this report is to set outBristols casualty statistics and to report onprogress towards the current casualtyreduction targets.
3.3.1 In Section 1 Service Assessment, the reportoutlines steps towards the targets set in2000 to be reached by 2010 and discussesthe further targets indicated within the JointLocal Transport Plan and the progressrequired to reach these.
Note: The Road Safety Strategy section within theJoint Local Transport Plan should be referredto for information on how it is proposed tomeet these targets.
3.3.2 It then looks at how the results have beenaffected over time by changes in reportingmethodology.
3.3.3 Consideration is then given to other issueswhich help to inform the road safety workprogramme partnerships and priority areasfor action.
3.3.4 In Section 2 The Casualty Report, a briefsummary of 2006 is included before the datais analysed in terms of casualties by severity,route, area and other factors.
3.3.5 Consideration is then given to casualties byage and user group in more detail.
3.3.6 Finally in this section a comprehensive list ofInjury Accident Cluster Sites is provided.
3.3.7 In Section 3 Directory, the costs of roadtraffic accidents in Bristol are summarised.
3.3.8 A glossary of terms is included along withcosts for providing road safety informationand road safety contacts in the Bristol area.
3
The Road Casualty Review 2006
3.0 Introduction
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asp -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
8/62
4.1 The statutory duty of the City Councilincludes and stresses the importance of roadsafety. The following are extracts from the1988 Road Traffic Act, Section 39 (asamended by the Road Traffic Act 1991):
39 (1) Each local authority must prepare and carryout a programme of measures designed topromote road safety and may makecontributions towards the cost of measuresfor promoting road safety taken by otherauthorities or bodies.
Measures include education and training,road safety audits and road safetyengineering.
(2) Each local authority:
a) must carry out studies into accidents arisingout of the use of vehicles on roads or parts ofroads other than trunk roads, within theirarea;
b) must, in the light of those studies, take suchmeasures as appear to the authority to beappropriate to prevent accidents, includingthe dissemination of information and advicerelating to the use of roads, the giving ofpractical training to road users or any class ordescription of road users, the construction,improvement, maintenance or repair ofroads for which they are the highwayauthority and other measures taken in the
exercise of their powers for controlling,protecting or assessing the movement oftraffic on roads, and;
c) in constructing new roads, must take suchmeasures as appear to the authority to beappropriate to reduce the possibilities ofsuch accidents when the roads come intouse.
Bristols Road Safety Team combines RoadSafety Engineering and Road SafetyEducation, Training and Publicity (ETP).
4.2 Road safety engineers manage and analysethe injury accident data presented in thisdocument. The road accident database isroutinely interrogated to identify problemsites and areas of concern such as injuryaccident cluster sites, and a list of localsafety schemes is proposed for treatablesites that could be expected to produce asignificant reduction in accidents. (SeePriority Areas for Action Section 9.0).
4.3 Road safety officers work with all sections ofthe community from school children to theelderly to try to reduce road casualties in thelong term. The Road Safety Team is based inthe Traffic Management team within theDepartment of Planning, Transport andSustainable Development. More details ofthe above activities can be found on the CityCouncils Road Safety pages Road Safetyand elsewhere on the City Councils website.
4.4 It should be noted that only personal injuryaccidents, which were reported to the policeand have been forwarded to the Council, arerepresented by accident data. An accidentmust involve one or more vehicles, occur onthe public highway and involve injury to oneor more persons. Damage only accidentsand near misses are not recorded. Researchindicates that for every injury accident thereare estimated to be over 17 damage-onlyaccidents on built-up roads.
4
The Road Casualty Review 2006
4.0 Background
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
9/62
5.1 In the year 2000, Central Governmentproduced the road safety strategyTomorrows Roads: Safer for Everyone.This set targets to be achieved by 2010,compared with the average of 1994-98 asfollows:
5.1.1 Target 1 a 40% reduction in the number ofpeople killed or seriously injured (KSI) in roadaccidents;
5.1.2 Target 2 - a 50% reduction in the number of
child KSIs;
5.1.3 Target 3 - a 10% reduction in the slightcasualty rate, expressed as the number ofpeople slightly injured per 100 million vehiclekilometres.
5.2 Bristol City Council adopted these targets andadopted additional targets, which areincluded within the Joint Local TransportPlan. These targets are set jointly for the four
participating Authorities (Bath and NorthEast Somerset Council, Bristol City Council,North Somerset Council and SouthGloucestershire Council) and have beenapproved by the Government under theoverarching Government targets for 2010(targets 1,2 & 3 as above).
5.2.1 20% reduction on the 2001-2004 averagenumber of KSIs (all ages) by 2010.
5.2.2 25% reduction on the 2001-2004 average
number of child KSIs by 2010.
5.2.3 No increase in the number of slightcasualties on the 2001-2004 average by2010.
5
The Road Casualty Review 2006
5.0 Targets
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/strategytargetsperformance/tomorrowsroadssaferforeveryo4865http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/strategytargetsperformance/tomorrowsroadssaferforeveryo4865 -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
10/62
6.1 Statistical Representation
6
The Road Casualty Review 2006
6.0 Progress Towards Targets
Figure 1 Casualty Targets and Progress
Note: 2010 targets are based on 1994 to 1998 average figures.
94-98 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TargetAverage for 2010
Child KSI'sTarget 30 29 27 26 25 24 22 21 20 19 17 16 15
Child KSI's 30 26 30 27 34 23 24 25 17 15
Table 2 - Presents the 2010 child KSI casualty reduction target progress.
94-98 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Average
KSI Target 177 171 164 158 151 145 138 132 125 119 112 106
Actual KSIs 177 177 180 243 197 228 178 171
Table 1 Presents progress towards 2010 killed and seriously Injured (KSI) targets.
Child KSI Totals KSI Totals Slight Rate Target KSI Target Child KSI Target Slight Rate
Ro
ad
Casualties
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0
50
100
150
200
250
2009 2010
Bristol City Council - Casualty Targets and Progress
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
11/62
6.2 Target 1 & 4a - reduction in the number of
people killed or seriously injured (KSI) in roadcollisions.
6.2.1 The number of total KSIs in 2006 continuedto fall with a 4% reduction from the previous
year.
6.2.2 A 38% reduction in KSI casualties will need tobe achieved over the next 4 years in order toreach the 2010 target. Progress suggest thatthis target is likely to prove challenging.
6.3 Target 2 - 50% reduction in the number ofchildren killed and seriously injured.
6.3.1 The number of children killed or seriouslyinjured decreased dramatically to 17 in 2006,from 25 in 2005. The interim target for 2006was met and the 2010 target was almostachieved. However, whilst these statistics arevery encouraging the figures involved arerelatively small and as such can be subject tosignificant yearly fluctuations and should
not be read in isolation.6.4 Target 3 - 10% reduction in the slight
casualty rate, expressed as the number ofpeople slightly injured per 100 millionvehicle kilometres.
6.4.1 The number of total casualties fell by justunder 1% again in 2006, although slightcasualties only fell by less than 0.5%.
6.4.2 The slight casualty rate remains at around 74
slight casualties per million vehiclekilometres.
6.4.3 Whilst progress continues to be made on
total casualty numbers, slight casualtynumbers remain above the target required tobring the rate down sufficiently to meet the2010 target of 66 slight casualties permillion vehicle kilometres.
6.4.4 Accidents involving speed related factorsaccounted for an estimated 26% of the total1,465 accidents in Bristol in 2006.
6.4.5 Speed related accidents are those whichhave been reported by the police to have the
contributory factors of in a hurry,excessive speed, aggressive drivingand/or to have been coded as a loss ofcontrolaccident. The Police do not attend allroad traffic accidents and it is thereforebelieved that this figure is underestimatedand that many more accidents are speedrelated. Research indicates that one-third ofall accidents are caused as a direct result ofexcess or inappropriate speed.
7
The Road Casualty Review 2006
94-98 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TargetAverage for 2010
Slight CasualtyTarget Rate 73 72 72 71 71 70 69 69 68 68 67 66 66
Slight CasualtyRate 73 88 82 83 81 75 72 74 74
Table 3 - Presents the 2010 slight casualty rate reduction target progress
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
12/62
6.5 Best Value Performance Indicator
6.5.1 Table 4 presents the Best Value PerformanceIndicator (BVPI99), which has been set underthe Local Government Act 1999.
6.5.2 Calendar year figures are reported 15months in arrears.
8
The Road Casualty Review 2006
1994-1998 2003 2004 2005 2006
average Reported 2004/05 Reported 2005/06 Reported 2006/07 Reported 2007/08Actual
number% changeover prev
year
% changeover 94-98
average
Actualnumber
% changeover prev
year
% changeover 94-98
average
Actualnumber
% changeover prev
year
% changeover 94-98
average
Actualnumber
% changeover prev
year
% changeover 94-98
averageTotal number
of people killedor seriously
injured177 197 -19% 9% 228 14% 22% 178 -22% 0% 171 -4% -3%
Number ofchildren killedor seriously
injured30 23 -32% -23% 24 4% -20% 25 4% -17% 17 -32% -43%
Total number
of peopleslightly injured 1524 1640 -4% 7% 1601 -2% 5% 1,640 2% 7% 1,635 0% 7%
Table 4 - Best Value Performance Indicator
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
13/62
7.1 Fluctuations from year to year highlight the
need for the careful monitoring of accidentsand it is therefore not advisable to considerindividual years in isolation. Trends overthree to five years should be regarded as aminimum.
7.2 Bristols Killed & Seriously Injured (KSI)History.
7.2.1 In 1998 Bristol experienced a 25% rise intotal casualties, from 1609 in 1997 to 2010
in 1998. This rise represented a steppedincrease as the average number of casualtiesfor the three years from 1998 to 2000 was23% higher than the three years prior to1998. This change in casualty totals wasconsidered to be the result of reorganisationand improvement in the collection ofaccident data collection by the Avon andSomerset Constabulary. Similar increasesexperienced by the other Local Authoritiesacross the Avon and Somerset region helped
to confirm this.
7.2.2 As the Central Government casualtyreduction targets are based on the averagetotals from 1994 to 1998, the base totals areweighted more heavily to the time prior tothe stepped increase in Bristols casualtytotals. This means the resulting casualtyreduction targets to be achieved by 2010 areconsidered artificially low and are thereforemore difficult to achieve.
7.2.3 Improved accident severity reporting hascontributed to the large fluctuations in KSIcasualties since 2001. In 2002, withagreement from Bristol City Council, theaccident recording form used by the Avonand Somerset police was altered to include adescription of serious injuries for the firsttime.
7.2.4 As a result of this change, the number of
killed and seriously injured (KSI) casualties inBristol rose by 34% from 2001 to 2002, yetthe total number of casualties rose by lessthan 1%. This represented a significantchange in the proportion of KSI casualties tototal casualties, known as the severity ratio.Over the next two years the Bristol KSIcasualty total and severity ratio continued tofluctuate as Bristol continued to improve theaccuracy of its data. (Table 5)
9
The Road Casualty Review 2006
7.0 Interpretation of Results
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
14/62
7.2.5 On 1 January 2005, a new national form wasintroduced to all police authorities includingAvon and Somerset. This form does notinclude a description of serious injuries aspart of the severity classification section.Results from 2005 and 2006 data (in table 5)indicate that the severity ratio has revertedback to pre-2002 levels.
7.2.6 The City Council Road Safety team is veryconcerned about it's findings and is keen toestablish confidence in it's KSI totals,particularly because of the emphasis placedon KSI casualties by the National targets.The Department for Transport has beennotified of these concerns and has beensupplied with copies of the investigationwork that was carried out.
7.2.7 As a result of the various changes to thecollection of casualty data from 2001 to2006 (Table 5) and the ensuing variations inKSI casualty totals and severity ratios, itfollows that the KSI totals from 2002 to 2004are not directly comparable with the KSItotals from years prior to 2002. This includesthe 1994 to 1998 totals on whichGovernment targets are based. It is therefore
considered useful to present recalculated KSItotals for 2002 to 2004 (Table 6) forcomparison.
10
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Year Total Casualties Total KSI % KSI1999 2074 182 9%
2000 1897 177 9%
2001 1949 181 9%
2002 1961 243 12%
2003 1837 197 11%
2004 1829 228 13%
2005 1817 178 10%
2006 1806 171 10%
Accident Form Details1999 to 2001 Avon and Somerset Form -No severity guidance on form.
New police form introduced. Severity guidanceintroduced on form for first time.
Form as per 2002.
Form as per 2002 & 2003 but police requested toinclude details of casualty injuries on form inorder to check severity classification.
New National Accident Form introduced. Noseverity guidance on form. Police no longerentering details of casualty injuries on form.
No change to form.
Table 5 - Bristols KSI History
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
15/62
7.2.8 These recalculated totals offer a bettercomparison with pre-2002 data and willmore accurately reflect Bristols performanceagainst targets during this period. It is alsoexpected that these recalculated totals willalso provide a smoother transition throughto KSI totals resulting from the use of thenew national accident form in 2005onwards. (Figure 2).
7.3 The Road Safety Strategy contained withinthe Joint Local Transport Plan identifies keyobjectives in addressing ongoing roadcasualty problems, including a section onSpeed Management.Joint Local Transport Plan
11
The Road Casualty Review 2006
1999
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2000 2001 2002 2003
Year
2004 2005 2006
KSI
Actual KSI* Factored KSI Target KSI
a b c d eYear Total Casualties Actual KSI Total Factored KSI Total* Difference (c d)
2002 1961 243 178 -65
2003 1837 197 167 -30
2004 1829 228 166 -62
Factored KSI Total (d) is Total casualties (b) multiplied by the average severity ratio of 1999 to 2001 (9.1%) from table 4.
Table 6 - Factored KSI Totals
Figure 2 - Actual KSI and Factored KSI totals against target trend
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asp -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
16/62
8.1 West of England Road Safety Partnership
The four Local Council Authorities of Bath &North East Somerset Council, Bristol CityCouncil, North Somerset and SouthGloucestershire Council have agreed to worktogether to improve road safety throughoutthe area.
The Partnership (incorporating the four LocalAuthorities, NHS Primary Care Trusts, Fire &Rescue, HM Court Service, Police, Highways
Agency and West of England Partnership)will enable Partners to work together tooptimise road safety activities and ensurethat the Road Safety Strategy of the JointLocal Transport Plan (JLTP) is fullyimplemented.
8.2 Background
In December 2005 the Governmentannounced that safety camera activities and
partnerships are to be integrated into awider road safety delivery process withfunding for safety cameras being provided tolocal authorities through the Local TransportPlan (LTP) from April 2007. This will give localauthorities more freedom and flexibility topursue the most appropriate mix of roadsafety measures to reduce road casualties intheir area.
The Government is enhancing the overall
level of funding for road safety in accordancewith road safety needs, such as the numberof casualties and the quality of LTPsubmissions.
Safety cameras still have an important roleto play in reducing speeding and collisions atlocations where excess or inappropriatespeed represents a serious road safetyproblem, but as part of an overall road safetystrategy.
The Road Safety Partnership will bringtogether professionals involved in road
safety to implement initiatives as part of awider road safety strategy encompassingeducation & publicity, engineering andenforcement.
It aims to build on the successes of the Avon& Somerset Safety Camera Partnership andmake use of resources presently focused onreducing speed to achieve greater reductionsin road traffic accidents and casualties.
It is anticipated that improved co-operation
and collaboration should maximise theimpact of education, training and publicitycampaigns and expenditure on road safety.
Pooling of knowledge will lead to greaterjustification for enforcement to back up roadsafety schemes and campaigns. Effectiveenforcement and the support of the Police isfundamental to achieving a reduction incasualties.
8.3 What the Partnership will do Implement the Road Safety Strategy
Action Plan in the JLTP.
Implement a road safety educationand publicity programme.
Procure camera enforcement servicesfrom the Avon & Somerset SafetyCamera Partnership.
Provide recommendations forallocating LTP funding to schemes.
Oversee the monitoring, analysis andreview of effectiveness of casualtyreduction schemes.
8.4 Safecam (formerly the Avon and SomersetSafety Camera Partnership)
The original Avon and Somerset SafetyCamera Partnership was launched in 2002 by
the local authorities, health authorities,police, Magistrates Court Service, Crown
12
The Road Casualty Review 2006
8.0 Partnerships
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
17/62
Prosecution Service and Highways Agencywith the aim of reducing deaths and injurieson roads through enforcement of speedlimits and education.
The establishment of the West of EnglandRoad Safety Partnership has taken on muchof this work, although the enforcement ofspeed limits and red traffic signals is nowprovided on behalf of the partnership bySafecam. www.safecam.org.uk
According to the results recently publishedby Safecam there has been a 10% reductionin road accidents at safety camera sites(speed and red light cameras) in the Bristolarea (based on data for the 2004/2005financial year) when compared to the three
years prior to Safety Camera Partnershipcommencing operations.
There are currently 12 roadside safetycameras and 21 Red light camera sites in
Bristol, with mobile speed detection camerasbeing used at another 50 locations. Thesuccess of the project will continue to be
judged directly on how far traffic speeds androad casualties are reduced, particularlywhen speed and red light jumping is asignificant factor in many crashes.
13
The Road Casualty Review 2006
http://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.safecam.org.uk/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
18/62
9.1 Each year a number of casualty reduction ledschemes are included in the Road Safetysection of the Traffic Management workprogramme in order to try to help meet ourcasualty reduction targets.
9.2 The City Council will continue to focus itsRoad Safety activities on locations with highaccident levels, high severity ratios, childcasualties and in areas with a high index ofmultiple deprivation. child casualties and inareas with a high index of multipledeprivation
9.3 Additional Factors Considered whenselecting sites are:
Other/future work programmes theTraffic Management annual workprogramme looks to maximise roadsafety benefit by engaging with, andinfluencing, other/multiple workprogrammes where possible.
Future development TrafficManagement annual work programmelooks to gain road safety benefit fromdeveloper contributions whereverpossible.
Maintenance issues if there are twosimilar schemes under considerationfor the work programme, then it maybe that the site that is in the worst
maintenance condition is chosen.
14
The Road Casualty Review 2006
9.0 Priority Areas for Action
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en] -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
19/62
Total casualty numbers fell slightly forthe fourth consecutive year.
Total KSI numbers fell by a further 4%.
Child KSI numbers fell by 32%.
Child casualty numbers fell by 8%overall.
Child pedestrian casualties fell by 17%.
Total Cycle casualties rose by 10%
although KSIs fell by 7%. Powered Two Wheeler casualties
increased by 7% but KSI casualties fellby 20%.
Car occupant casualties fell by 3%.
11.1 Table 7 presents a comparison of accidentand casualties numbers for 2005 and 2006.
15
The Road Casualty Review 2006SECTION 2 - THE CASUALTY REPORT
2005 2006 % Change2005 - 2006
Fatal Accidents 9 14 56%Casualties 9 15 67%
Serious Accidents 166 143 -14%Casualties 169 156 -8%
Slight Accidents 1323 1308 -1%Casualties 1640 1635 =
Total Accidents 1497 1465 -2%Casualties 1817 1806 -1%
Table 7 - Comparison of Accident/Casualty data: 2005 with 2006
10.0 Summary of 2006 Casualty Figures
11.0 Casualties by Severity
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
20/62
12.1 Table 8 presents accident data for 2005 &2006 on principle roads
16
The Road Casualty Review 2006
12.0 Casualties by Route
EuroRAP2004 2005 Risk rating
Route Casualties Casualties KSI Rank Rank Casualties Casualties KSI Rank Rankper km (cas/ km) (KSI/ km) per km (cas/ km)(KSI/ km)
A3029 15 2.42 2 18 16 24 3.87 0 15 18=
A369 3 3.00 0 17 21= 2 2.00 1 18 5 Medium
A37 56 9.49 4 3 6 27 4.58 2 13 14
A370 24 5.85 1 11 17 24 5.85 1 8 16
A38 North 117 16.25 16 1 1 117 16.25 9 1 2
A38 South 40 7.27 3 7 9 26 4.73 5 11 7 Medium
A4 Central 26 6.84 4 10 3 27 7.11 3 6 9 Medium
A4 North 18 1.22 6 20 15 21 1.43 2 21 17 Medium
A4 South 51 7.61 1 6 19 71 10.60 7 5 3= Medium
A4017 0 0.00 0 22 21= 0 0.00 0 22 18=
A4018 106 8.03 10 5 5 76 5.76 10 9 10
A403 20 3.03 3 16 12= 12 1.82 2 20 15
A4032 12 5.45 1 12 12= 24 10.91 1 4 13
A4044 26 7.22 4 9 2 17 4.72 3 12 8
A4162 7 2.26 2 19 8 6 1.94 0 19 18=
A4174 58 7.25 4 8 11 51 6.38 5 7 11
A4176 2 0.91 1 21 12= 8 3.64 0 16 18=
A420 53 8.83 4 4 7 81 13.5 8 2 1
A431 7 3.68 1 14 10 10 5.26 2 10 3=
A432 82 13.02 6 2 4 70 11.11 6 3 6
A4320 27 4.22 1 13 18 29 4.53 3 14 12
M32 34 3.47 1 15 20 29 2.96 0 17 18= Low
Table 8 Accident Rates (on principle roads) per Km - 2004/2005
Notes: The casualty rates shown above are based on geographical road lengths, ignoring additional highway lengths at dual
carriageways, roundabouts etc.
Rank order of casualty and KSI rate per km (1 is the highest).
Eurorap rating is taken from work carried out by The AA Motoring trust which assesses Europes roads in terms of safety.
(It should be noted that the road lengths used for Eurorap roads may be different).
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
21/62
12.2 The EuroRAP (European Road Programme)rates are also included where appropriate.EuroRAP is an international not-for profitassociation formed by motoringorganisations and road authorities in Europeto provide a safety rating for Motorways andmajor roads across Europe. The EuroRAP
12.3 Table 9 presents accident data split by roadclass and severity for 2005 and 2006.
17
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Road Class Fatal Serious Slight Total
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
Motorway 0 0 5 1 44 36 49 37A 4 10 64 55 523 502 591 567
B 0 0 21 18 210 208 231 226
Unclassified 5 4 76 69 545 562 626 635
Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465
Table 9 - Number of accidents split by road class and severity
http://www.eurorap.org/http://www.eurorap.org/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
22/62
13.1 Evidence shows there to be a strong link
between social deprivation and casualtynumbers. Index of Multiple Deprivation iscalculated using weighted indicators onincome, employment, health, education,housing, crime and environment. Formerlythis was carried out on a ward by ward basis,however, from 2004 deprivation data is nowcalculated using smaller Super Output Areas(SOAs), representing readily identifiablegeographical areas with similar populations.
For further information about SOAs inBristol, click on the following link SOAs
13.2 There are 252 SOAs in Bristol but, for the
purpose of analysis, we concentrate on themost deprived and least deprived 10%,(Index of Multiple Deprivation BristolRankings).
13.3 The casualty numbers in different casualtyclasses were examined and for each casualtyclass in each group an average number ofcasualties per SOA was calculated. Alsocalculated was a percentage figure for eachcasualty class within each group expressed
as a percentage of the total casualties in thatclass.
13.4 The most significant findings are shownbelow.
13.5 The average number of casualties per SOA inall of the casualty classes below tended toincrease with deprivation:
KSIs
Slight casualties
Total casualties
Child casualties
This indicates that there is a link betweendeprivation and road casualties.
18
The Road Casualty Review 2006
13.0 Casualties by Area - Deprivation
Most deprived 10% of SOAs Least deprived 10% of SOAs
Experienced an average of 14 accidents per SOA Experienced an average of 4 accidents per SOA19% of all KSIs took place in the most 4% of child casualties were located in the leastdeprived 10% of SOAs deprived 10% of SOAs
25% of slight accidents took place in 8% of slight accidents took place inthe most deprived 10% of SOAs the least deprived 10% of SOAs
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en] -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
23/62
14.1 Table 10 presents accident data split bymonth and severity for 2005 and 2006.
19
The Road Casualty Review 2006
14.0 Casualties by Other Factors
Month Fatal Serious Slight Total
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
January 0 3 11 6 118 122 129 131
February 0 1 9 13 120 104 129 118
March 1 0 14 9 99 106 114 115
April 1 0 15 8 112 79 128 87
May 0 1 16 12 119 92 135 105
June 1 1 11 9 113 118 125 128
July 1 1 14 18 110 131 125 150
August 0 2 17 11 111 104 128 117
September 0 0 11 16 100 132 111 148
October 0 2 13 12 90 130 103 144
November 3 1 19 11 122 85 144 97
December 2 2 16 18 108 105 126 125Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465
Table 10 - Number of accidents per month split by severity
14.2 Table 11 presents accident data split by light condition and severity for 2004 and 2005.
Lighting Fatal Serious Slight TotalCondition
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
Daylight 3 8 101 82 941 947 1045 1037
Darkness 6 6 65 61 381 361 452 428
Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465
Table 11 - Number of accidents in daylight and darkness split by severity
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
24/62
20
The Road Casualty Review 2006
14.3 Table 12 presents accident data split by road surface condition and severity for 2005 and 2006.
RoadSurfaceCondition Fatal Serious Slight Total
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
Dry 6 8 117 106 980 964 1103 1078
Wet/Damp 3 6 44 36 327 333 374 375
Snow 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0
Frost/Ice 0 0 3 0 13 9 16 9Flood 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3
Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465
Table 12 - Number of accidents by road surface condition split by severity
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
25/62
21
The Road Casualty Review 2006
15.0 Casualties by Age and User Group
15.1 Table 13 presents casualty data split by age group, severity and road user type for 2006.
Casualty Analysis by Age : 2006
CHILDREN Total ADULTS Total Age TotalChildren Adults Unknown
Age Group 0-4 5-6 7-11 12-15 16-16 17-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71+
Pedestrians
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 6 0 6
Serious 2 1 2 2 7 1 4 6 4 4 4 4 6 33 0 40
Slight 10 8 27 23 68 2 34 51 34 11 16 7 12 167 2 237Sub Total 12 9 29 25 75 3 38 58 39 16 20 12 20 206 2 283
Cyclists
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2
Serious 0 0 2 1 3 0 1 6 6 4 3 0 0 20 0 23
Slight 0 3 6 18 27 3 16 84 49 24 9 2 2 189 4 220
Sub Total 0 3 8 19 30 3 17 91 55 29 12 2 2 211 4 245
Powered 2-Wheelers & Combinations : Riders
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Serious 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 9 13 5 2 0 0 41 0 41
Slight 0 0 0 2 2 32 47 40 30 20 9 2 1 181 0 183
Sub Total 0 0 0 2 2 40 52 49 44 25 11 2 1 226 0 226
Powered 2-Wheelers & Combinations : Passengers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Slight 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 4
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 5
4-Wheeled Cars & Taxis : Drivers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 3
Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 5 0 1 2 2 23 0 23
Slight 0 0 0 0 0 1 62 202 113 97 60 24 19 578 1 579
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 70 208 119 97 62 26 21 604 1 605
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
26/62
22
The Road Casualty Review 2006
CHILDREN Total ADULTS Total Age TotalChildren Adults Unknown
Age Group 0-4 5-6 7-11 12-15 16-16 17-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71 +
4-Wheeled Cars & Taxis : Passengers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Serious 0 0 0 6 6 1 3 7 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 18
Slight 10 6 16 17 49 9 65 90 33 23 17 11 13 261 7 317
Sub Total 10 6 16 23 55 10 70 97 33 23 17 11 14 275 7 337
PCV/Minibus/Motor Caravan : Drivers & Passengers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 3
Slight 4 0 0 2 6 0 4 4 4 16 8 9 3 48 2 56
Sub Total 4 0 0 2 6 0 4 4 5 16 8 11 3 51 2 59
All Goods Vehicles : Drivers / Passengers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 3
Slight 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 3 3 6 0 2 20 0 21
Sub Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 4 3 8 0 2 23 0 24
Other Motor & Non-Motor Vehicles : Drivers / Passengers
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serious 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Slight 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 5 5 2 1 0 0 16 0 18
Sub Total 0 0 1 2 3 0 3 6 6 2 2 0 0 19 0 22
TOTALS
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 15 0 15
Serious 2 1 5 9 17 9 22 34 31 13 13 8 9 139 0 156
Slight 24 18 49 64 155 47 232 483 272 196 126 55 52 1463 17 1635
Sub Total 26 19 54 73 172 57 256 520 306 211 140 64 63 1617 17 1806
Table 13 2006 Casualty Data by User Group, Age and Severity
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
27/62
23
The Road Casualty Review 2006
15.2 Figure 3 demonstrates the comparative trend in Casualties by Road User Group over the past eightyears and includes the 94-98 average for comparison.
Year
94 - 96 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Pedestrians Cyclists Motorcyclists Car Occupants Other
Year
94 - 96 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Pedestrians Cyclists Motorcyclists Car Occupants Other
Figure 3 Casualties by Road User Group
Figure 4 KSI Casualties by Road User Group
Casualties by Road User Group
KSI Casualties by Road User Group
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
28/62
24
Fatal Serious
KSI Slight
Slight
Casualties
Year
Age Group
94 - 96 avg
0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Casualti
es
140
120
100
8060
40
20
0
16.1 Figures 5 to 24 show yearly road user casualty data split by severity since 1999 along with a
breakdown of number of casualties by age group for 2006. Comments regarding general trends areincluded for each road user group.
16.2 Child Pedestrians.
16.2.1 Table 14 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 5.
16.0 Specific Road User Group Analysis
Figure 5
Figure 6
Child Pedestrians
Child Pedestrians - 2006
The Road Casualty Review 2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
29/62
16.2.2 The number of child pedestrians injured in2006 fell by 17% from the previous year andKSIs dropped to 35% of the 1994-98
average.16.2.3 Whilst the UK has a relatively good road
safety record overall in Europe, childpedestrian casualties nationally still givecause for concern.[See Department for Transport website forfurther information:Department for Transport
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
School Travel Plans
Walking Buses
School Crossing Patrols
Child Safety Audit
25
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Child Pedestrians
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 103 19 1 123 20 16
1999 113 15 0 128 15 12
2000 96 22 1 119 23 19
2001 98 18 1 117 19 16
2002 106 21 0 127 21 17
2003 77 16 0 93 16 17
2004 61 17 0 78 17 222005 73 17 0 90 17 19
2006 68 7 0 75 7 9
Table 14
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/school-crossing-patrol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-safety-audit.enhttp://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/school-crossing-patrol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-safety-audit.en -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
30/62
26
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Casualties
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Fatal Serious
KSI Slight
Slight
Year
Age Group
94 - 98 avg
0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.3 Child Cyclists
16.3.1 Table 15 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 7.
Child Cyclist
Child Cyclist - 2006
Figure 7
Figure 8
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
31/62
16.3.2 Child cyclist casualties have remainedconsistant since 2001 set against anincrease in general cycle use (all ages) of
34% over the same period.Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
Child cycle training
Bike IT
National Cycle Training Standards
School Travel Plans
27
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Child Cyclist
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 41 4 1 46 5 11
1999 61 3 1 65 4 6
2000 35 4 0 39 4 10
2001 26 5 0 31 5 16
2002 26 4 0 30 4 13
2003 30 3 0 33 3 9
2004 28 2 0 30 2 72005 25 2 1 28 3 11
2006 27 3 0 30 3 10
Table 15
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.en -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
32/62
28
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Casu
alties
0
5
10
15
20
25
Fatal Serious
KSI Slight
Slight
Year
Age Group
94 - 98 avg
0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.4 Child Car Passengers
16.4.1 Table 16 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 9.
Child Car Passenger
Figure 9
Child Car Passenger - 2006
Figure 10
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
33/62
16.4.2 The number of child car passenger injuriesin 2006 rose by 18% on the previous year.Of the 6 seriously injured children, 4
occurred as a result of a single accident.
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
Try before you buy
School Gate Reports
School Gate Reports are an assessment ofbehaviour outside a school at the start and end of
the school day. Road Safety Officers andsometimes students observe and note down thingslike:
Crossing the road safely,
Holding hands of younger children,
Parking on zigzags or pavement,
Wearing Seatbelts.
The report is then compiled and sent out toparents with the school news letter. These reportstake place on an as and when requested basis.
Walking BusesWalk on Wednesday
29
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Child Car Passengers
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 69 2 0 71 2 3
1999 95 2 0 97 2 2
2000 73 3 0 76 3 4
2001 62 2 0 64 2 3
2002 50 1 0 51 1 2
2003 70 2 0 72 2 3
2004 79 2 0 81 2 32005 44 1 0 45 1 2
2006 49 6 0 55 6 11
Table 16
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-car-seat-checks.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-car-seat-checks.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4 -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
34/62
30
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Casua
lties
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
16.5 Adult Pedestrians
16.5.1 Table 17 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 11.
Adult Pedestrians
Figure 11
Adult Pedestrians - 2006
Figure 12
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
35/62
16.5.2 Adult pedestrian casualty figures fell by 9%
to a new lowest recorded figure, continuingthe general trend since 2001. The numberof KSI casualties, as a percentage of overallcasualty numbers (severity ratio) has alsobeen falling from the 2002 high of 30% to19% in 2006.
16.5.3 The most vulnerable age group is the 17-20age range.
31
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Adult Pedestrians
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 168 42 5 215 47 22
1999 174 49 1 224 50 22
2000 188 41 6 235 47 20
2001 198 40 6 244 46 19
2002 166 63 7 236 70 30
2003 172 47 6 225 53 24
2004 165 42 7 214 49 232005 186 39 2 227 41 18
2006 167 33 6 206 39 19
Table 17
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
36/62
32
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
50
100
150
200
250
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.6 Adult Cyclists
16.6.1 Table 18 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 13.
Casualti
es
0
20
40
60
80
100
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
Adult Cyclists
Figure 13
Adult Cyclists - 2006
Figure 14
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
37/62
16.6.2 Although the general casualty trend foradult cyclists had remained fairly constantsince 2001, casualties rose by a further 9%in 2006. Cycle journeys (all ages) have
increase by 34% in the same period.
16.6.3 However, the rate of KSI casualties fell to10% in 2006 from 13% in the previous year.[Please refer to Interpretation of Results section 7.0]
16.6.4 The most vulnerable age group remains the21-30 group.
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council and
links to sites with further information:
The Cycling Strategy
Adult Cycle Training Scheme
Biggest Bike Ride
National Bike week
Car Free Day
Bristol Bike Shed (Cycle Resource Centre)
National Cycle Network (NCN)
Bike Buddies
33
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Adult Cyclists
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 137 15 1 153 16 11
1999 183 16 2 201 18 9
2000 159 17 0 176 17 10
2001 173 20 0 193 20 10
2002 135 18 0 153 18 12
2003 161 23 0 184 23 13
2004 149 32 1 182 33 182005 168 24 0 192 24 13
2006 189 20 2 211 22 10
Table 18
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.234car.com/bikebuddies/bikebuddies.htmlhttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.234car.com/bikebuddies/bikebuddies.html -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
38/62
34
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fatal Serious Slight
Year94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.7 Adult Car Drivers
16.7.1 Table 19 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 15.
Casualties
0
50
100
150
200
250
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
Adult Car Drivers
Figure 15
Adult Car Drivers - 2006
Figure 16
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
39/62
16.7.2 The numbers of adult car driver casualtieshave been generally rising since the 94-98average. However, numbers dropped back alittle in 2005 and have dropped further in
2006 to a level 7% higher than the 94-98average. The most vulnerable age groupremains the 21-30 age range.
16.7.3 The number of KSI casualties is 4% of totalcasualties in 2006 (from 6% as the 1994-1998 average).
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
Educational campaigns
Annual Drink Drive Campaign
The Safety Camera Partnership
Enforcement
35
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Adult Cyclists
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 529 30 4 563 34 6
1999 667 33 1 701 34 5
2000 587 23 2 612 25 4
2001 595 28 3 626 31 5
2002 668 42 3 713 45 6
2003 584 26 3 613 29 5
2004 618 34 2 654 36 62005 610 20 3 633 23 4
2006 578 23 3 604 26 4
Table 19
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/national-road-safety-information.enhttp://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/national-road-safety-information.enhttp://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
40/62
36
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casualties
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.8 Adult Car Passengers
16.8.1 Table 20 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 17.
Adult Car Passengers
Figure 17
Casualties
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
Adult Car Passengers - 2006
Figure 18
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
41/62
16.8.2 Despite a 14% increase over 2005 figures,adult car passengers casualty figuresremained less than 4% higher than the1994-1998 average in 2006. (The 2005
figures should perhaps be regarded as anexceptional dip in an underlying reductionin casualties since 2002).
16.8.3 KSI casualties remain low at 5% of totalcasualty figures in this class.
16.8.4 The most vulnerable group is now the17-20 age range.
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
Educational campaigns
The Safety Camera Partnership
37
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Adult Car Passengers
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 248 16 1 265 17 6
1999 313 18 1 332 19 6
2000 267 16 2 285 18 6
2001 291 16 1 308 17 6
2002 356 29 0 385 29 8
2003 265 21 0 286 21 7
2004 259 24 1 284 25 92005 227 7 1 235 8 3
2006 261 12 2 275 14 5
Table 20
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.safecam.org.uk/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
42/62
38
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casua
lties
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Cas
ualties
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
16.9 Powered Two Wheeler Users
16.9.1 Table 21 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 19.
Powered Two Wheeler Users
Figure 19
Powered Two Wheeler Users - 2006
Figure 20
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
43/62
16.9.2 The general casualty trend for powered twowheeler (PTWs) users has been increasingsince the 94-98 average. However, 2006saw a 9% fall in casualties along with a
reduction in the KSI rate from 21% to 19%.
16.9.4 The casualty figures for 2006 are now 28%above the 1994-1998 average.
Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:
Bristol City Council web page
Motorcycle Strategy
Campaigns
Motorcycle awareness courses
Enforcement
Motorcycle Industry Association
Motorcycle Action Group
39
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Powered Two Wheeler Users
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 133 29 3 165 32 19
1999 173 29 2 204 31 15
2000 197 35 0 232 35 15
2001 198 31 4 233 35 15
2002 178 47 4 229 51 22
2003 165 41 0 206 41 20
2004 162 52 6 220 58 262005 204 52 2 258 54 21
2006 187 42 2 231 44 19
Table 21
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.en?page=4#internalSection4http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.mcia.co.uk/http://bristol.mag-uk.org/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.en?page=4#internalSection4http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.mcia.co.uk/http://bristol.mag-uk.org/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
44/62
40
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casu
alties
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Casualties
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
16.10 Bus Occupants
16.10.1Table 22 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 21.
Bus Occupants
Figure 21
Bus Occupants - 2006
Figure 22
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
45/62
16.10.2 Injuries to bus occupants fell by 38% in2006. Casualty figures for bus occupantshave tended to fluctuate from year to year.The 2006 figure is 35% lower than the
1994-1998 average
41
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Bus Occupants
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 76 2 0 79 2 3
1999 71 7 0 78 7 9
2000 79 1 0 80 1 1
2001 99 4 0 103 4 4
2002 47 2 0 49 2 4
2003 72 6 0 78 6 8
2004 54 5 0 59 5 92005 79 4 0 83 4 5
2006 54 3 0 57 3 5
Table 22
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
46/62
42
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Casua
lties
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
45
Fatal Serious Slight
Year
94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16.11 Goods Vehicle Occupants
16.11.1Table 23 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 23.
Goods Vehicle Occupants
Figure 23
Casualties
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KSI Slight
Age Group
16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+
Goods Vehicle Occupants - 2006
Figure 24
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
47/62
16.11.2 Casualty numbers for Goods Vehicleoccupants can vary considerably from yearto year. In 2006 there was an increase of43% although figures remain relatively
low and no clear trend is evident.
43
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Goods Vehicle Occupants
Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI
1994 -1998Average 14 0.8 0.2 15 1 7
1999 22 2 0 24 2 8
2000 19 2 0 21 2 10
2001 15 1 0 16 1 6
2002 29 2 0 31 2 7
2003 33 1 1 35 2 6
2004 25 0 0 25 0 02005 11 2 0 13 2 15
2006 21 3 0 24 3 13
Table 23
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
48/62
17.0 Road Safety Economics
17.1 Table 24 is an extract from the Departmentfor Transport Highways Economic Note No. 1(January 2007) showing the average value ofprevention per accident by severity and classof road.
Using the average cost per accident on urbanroads suggests a cost to the community inBristol of over one hundred and forty millionpounds (140m) in 2006.
17.2 The costs shown in Table 24 are used to
calculate economic rates of return forschemes intended to reduce road casualties.This allows the City Council to demonstrateits genuine effort in terms of the allocationof Local Transport Plan funding andenhanced road safety on the streets ofBristol.
44
The Road Casualty Review 2006 SECTION 3 - DIRECTORY
Road Class
Accident Severity Urban 1 Rural 2 Motorway All
Fatal 1,558,290 1,669,140 1,751,150 1,644,790
Serious 179,210 206,700 213,540 188,920
Slight 18,130 21,620 25,570 19,250
All Injury 49,580 105,900 78,930 64,440
Damage Only 1,590 2,360 2,270 1,710
Average cost per injury 77,820 124,280 96,160 89,820accident including anallowance for damageon accidents 3
Notes:
1 Urban roads are those roads other than motorways with speed limits of 40mph or less
2 Rural roads are those roads other than motorways with speed limits greater than 40mph
3 Cost per injury accident including an allowance for damage only accidents
Table 24 - Average value in s of the prevention of a single accident split by severity and class of road: all hours.
Table 24
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
49/62
45
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Accident A collision involving one or more vehicles, resulting in personal injury, which
occurred on the public highway and was reported to the police within 30 daysof occurrence.
Accident severity The severity of the most seriously injured casualty:
KSI Killed or seriously injured.
Serious Injury Injury resulting in detention in hospital as an in-patient, or fractures,concussion, internal injuries, crushing, severe cuts and lacerations, severegeneral shock, injuries causing death 30 or more days after a road accident.
Slight Injury Injury of a minor character such as a sprain, bruise or cut judged not to be
severe or slight shock.
BVPI Best Value Performance Indicator
Casualty A person killed or injured in an accident.
Casualty Class A distinction between drivers/ riders, passengers and pedestrians etc.
Child/Adult For the purposes of analysing casualties by age, persons aged 15 years andbelow are classed as children and persons aged 16 years and above are classedas adults.
ETP Education, Training & Publicity
EuroRAP European Road Programme
Fatal Injury Death occurring within 30 days of, and as a result of a road accident.
Goods Vehicle:
LGV Goods vehicle under 3.5 tonnes laden weight.
HGV Goods vehicle over 3.5 tonnes laden weight.
Hours of Darkness The period coinciding with lighting up time, i.e. half an hour after sunset to
half an hour before sunrise.JLTP Joint Local Transport Plan
Pedestrians Includes persons riding toy cycles on the footway, persons pushing bicycles,persons pushing or pulling other vehicles, occupants of prams or wheelchairsand people who alight safely from vehicles and are subsequently injured.
PSA Target Public Service Agreement Target
PSV/PCV Public Service Vehicles, including buses and coaches, whether on stagecarriage service or not.
18.0 Glossary of Terms
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
50/62
46
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Roadside Object An object situated adjacent to the carriageway. Includes items of street
furniture and natural features such as trees, ditches and hedges. Excludespedestrians.
Severity Index A measure of the severity of a group of accidents defined as the ratio of fataland serious combined to all injury accidents within that group.
TWMV/PTW Two Wheeled Motor Vehicle/Powered Two Wheeler. Powered two wheelersincluding mopeds, scooters, motor cycles and motor cycle combinations.
19.0 Charges for Providing Road Accident Information
19.1 No charge is made for accident information made available in the interests of road safety promotion.Bristol City Council does, however, reserve the right to offset costs of providing data for commercialuse. The charging structure is as follows:
(i) 70.00 for up to 10 accidents + 5.00 for additional 10 accidents + VAT for accident plot anddetails
(ii) a charge relating to staff time, computer costs and administrative overheads for complexenquiries not properly covered by (i)
Requests may be made in writing, fax or e-mail. Contact details below.
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
51/62
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
52/62
BRAKE
PO Box 548HuddersfieldHD1 2XZ
tel: 01484 559909
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.brake.org.uk/
South Gloucestershire Council
Planning, Transportation and StrategicEnvironmentChris StutleyHighways SectionBroad LaneYateSouth GloucestershireBS37 7FY
Tel: (01454) 863640
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.southglos.gov.uk
Bath & Northeast Somerset
GuildhallHigh Street,Bath BA1 5AW
tel: (01225) 477000
web: www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathnes
North Somerset Council
Town HallWalliscote Grove RoadWeston-super-MareSomersetBS23 1UJ
tel: (01934) 888 888
web: www.n-somerset.gov.uk/
or
Liz BuxtonRoad Safety
(01275) 882021
West of England Road Safety Partnership
Adrian Clarke : Transport Policy Manager, Bath& North East Somerset Council
Colin Knight ; Head of Transport Operations,Bristol City Council
Frank Cox ; New Works Manager, NorthSomerset Council
Derek Bailie ; Head of Highways, SouthGloucestershire Council
Useful Websites:
Department for Transport
Sustrans
European Road Assessment Programme
48
The Road Casualty Review 2006
http://www.brake.org.uk/http://www.southglos.gov.uk/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathneshttp://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.eurorap.org/http://www.brake.org.uk/http://www.southglos.gov.uk/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathneshttp://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.eurorap.org/ -
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
53/62
49
The Road Casualty Review 2006Injury Accident Cluster Sites for 2004 - 2006
BristolC
ityCouncil
INJURYACCIDENTCLUSTER
SITES
-2004to2006
Notes:1
Thistablecontainsdatabyroute,conce
rningreportedinjuryaccidents(Accs),together
withseparatecolumnsforaccidentsinvolvingp
edestrians(Peds)andaccidents
involvingbicycles(Bike).Thetotalnumberofcasualtiesresultingfromthereportedinjuryaccidentsateachsiteisrecorded(Cas),toge
therwiththenumberofcasualties
under16yearsofage(Child).Thetotal
numberofcasualtiesthatwereeitherkilledors
eriouslyinjuredisrecorded(KSI)includingthos
ecasualtiesunder16yearsold
thatwerekilledorseriouslyinjured(ChildKSI).Datarelatestoaccidentsoccurringinthethreeyearperiodfrom1stJanuary2004to3
1stDecember2006.
2
Allsiteslistedhad5ormorereportedin
juryaccidentsoccurringwithinaradiusof40metres.
3
Accidentinjurysitesgenerallyoccuratroadfeaturesorcombinationsofroadfeaturess
uchasjunctions,roundaboutsandpedestrianc
rossingfacilities.Thesetypes(Type)
offeaturearespecifiedinthetableassetoutbelow:
Z=ZebraCrossing
P=Pelican/PuffinCrossing
C=SignalControlledCrossing
J=PriorityCon
trolledJunction
S=SignalControlledJunction
R=Roundabout
M=Mini-roundabout
L=LengthofR
oad
4
Sitesmaybeaddressedbymorethano
neprogramme(Prog)asindicatedbythefollow
ingcodes:
R=RouteReview
T=AreaTrafficCalming
B=BusQualityPartnership/Showcase
M=MaintenanceImprovements
P=CityCentrePromenadeProject
L=LocalSafetyScheme
C=Cyclingincl.NationalCycle
Network
A=Access/MobilityImprovements
J=JunctionImprovementforVulnerableRdUsers
D=DevelopmentProp
osals
U=UrbanTrafficManagement
&Control
S=SaferRoute
stoSchool
5
Sitestatus(Stat)isindicatedasfollows:
E=Existingsite(5ormoreinjuryaccidents2003to2005)
N=Newsite(lessthan5injuryaccidentsin2003to2005)
6
Abbreviationsareasfollows:
LSS=LocalSafetyScheme
UTC=UrbanTrafficControl
AS
L=Advancedstopline
VAS=VehicleActivatedSign
SCOOT=SplitCycleOffsetO
ptimisationTechnique
SR
tS=SaferRoutestoSchool
MOVA=MicroprocessorOptimisedVehicleActuation
Ref
Route
Location
Type
3
Prog
4
Accs
1
Peds1
Bike
1
Cas1
KSI1
Child1
ChildKSI1St
at5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6
Date
A3029
1
BrunelWay/nrAshtonGateUnderpass
L
L
5
0
0
6
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
2
WinterstokeRoad/AshtonDrive
R
DR
5
0
0
8
1
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
3
WinterstokeRd/SouthLibertyLane/LuckwellRd
J
L
5
0
0
9
0
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
Route
Totals
3sites
15
0
0
23
1
2
0
Accident
s
Casualties
InjuryAccidentClusterSites
for2004-2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
54/62
50
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Ref
Route
Location
Type
3
Prog
4
Accs
1
Peds
1
Bike
1
Cas
1
KSI1
Child1
ChildKSI1Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6
Date
A37
4
WellsRd/BathRoad(ThreeLampsjunction)
S
6
1
0
7
0
2
0
E
Monitor
07/08
5
WellsRd/BrecknockRd
J
6
2
1
6
1
2
0
E
Monitor
07/08
6
WellsRd/MarstonRoad/OakmeadPk
JM
M
11
1
0
11
2
0
0
E
Monitor
07/08
7
WellsRd/RedcatchRd/GreenmooreR
d
JP
BM
6
2
0
6
2
0
0
E
Monitor
07/08
8
WellsRd/BroadWalk
SC
LMJ
14
2
1
20
1
0
0
E
HighFrictionsurfacing
05/06
9
WellsRd/HengroveLane/WestTown
Lane
SC
MD
10
0
1
20
2
2
0
E
Digitalredlightsafetycamera&signalup
graded
10
WellsRoad/PethertonRoad
J
BL
5
0
1
5
1
0
0
E
Monitor
07/08
11
WellsRd/NewFossewayRd
J
BLJ
7
1
0
11
0
3
0
E
Monitor
07/08
RouteTotals
8sites
65
9
4
86
9
9
0
A370
12
YorkRd/St.Luke'sRd
SC
ML
9
3
1
14
1
3
0
E
Monitor
07/08
13
ClarenceRoad/ChattertonStreet
7
0
0
8
0
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
RouteTotals
2sites
16
3
1
22
1
3
0
A38
14
BedminsterDownRd/BishopsworthR
d/BridgwaterRd
S
ML
6
2
0
8
0
1
0
E
ModerniseSignals
06/07
15
WestStreet(ChesselStreettoBartlett'sRoad)
LZ
6
1
2
7
2
0
0
E
Monitor
07/08
16
EastStreet/ChurchRoad
J
L
5
1
1
5
0
1
0
N
Investigate
07/08
17
BedminsterParade/EastStreet
P
L
6
3
2
6
1
1
0
N
Investigate
07/08
18
RedcliffHill/CommercialRd/Bedminst
erBridge
SC
BPM
6
0
1
7
1
0
0
E
Monitor
07/08
19
RedcliffeWay/RedcliffStRdbt
R
M
7
0
3
7
0
0
0
E
Monitor
20
St.Augustine'sParadeoppositeHippo
drome
LP
P
16
9
1
17
3
0
0
E
CityCentresafetystudycompleted
04/05
21
ColstonAve/BaldwinSt/BroadQuay
SC
PL
15
1
3
0
16
0
0
0
E
Realignmentofpedestriancrossing
03/04
22
ColstonAve/BroadQuay
SC
P
6
2
0
6
0
0
0
E
CityCentresafetystudycompleted
04/05
23
ColstonAvenearStStephensAve
SC
8
1
1
13
0
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
24
ColstonAve/RupertSt/QuaySt
SLC
P
10
4
0
11
2
0
0
E
CityCentresafetystudycompleted
04/05
25
RupertStreet/o/sCourts
CL
P
7
2
0
7
0
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
26
RupertSt/LewinsMead
SCJ
M
6
4
0
7
2
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
27
TheHaymarket/StJamesBartonRdb
t
R
11
2
0
12
0
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
28
St.James'BartonRdbt/NorthSt
SR
7
2
2
8
0
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
29
StJamesBarton/BondSt
SR
8
2
3
8
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
30
StokesCroft
L
8
2
2
8
1
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
31
StokesCroft/CityRoad/UpperYork
St
SC
BSL
13
1
6
13
2
0
0
E
BannedTurnSchemeproposed
07/08
32
StokesCroft/JamaicaSt
SC
B
10
5
4
10
1
0
0
E
BannedTurnSchemeproposed
07/08
33
CheltenhamRoad(South)
L
JMBL
6
3
1
7
2
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
34
CheltenhamRd/ArleyHill/BathBuildin
gs
SC
BSJL
14
1
5
18
1
0
0
E
Improvementstosignaljunctioncomplete
07/08
35
CheltenhamRd/CothamBrow
MJ
BM
7
0
1
9
0
0
0
E
Monitor
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
55/62
51
Ref
R
oute
Location
Type
3
Prog
4
Accs1Peds1
Bike
1
Cas1
KSI1
Child1
ChildKSI1S
tat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6
Date
36
GloucesterRd/EltonRd/ZetlandRd
SC
BM
9
1
3
14
2
1
0
E
Monitor
37
GloucesterRd/OvertonRd/ClaremontRd
JLP
BM
7
3
2
7
2
1
0
E
Monitor
38
GloucesterRd/BerkeleyRd/Somerville
Rd
SC
9
1
3
9
1
1
0
N
Investigate
07/08
39
GloucesterRd/BrynlandAve
J
BM
8
1
5
8
2
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
40
GloucesterRd/LongmeadAve/NevilRd
JZ
BM
7
3
2
8
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
41
GloucesterRd/DongolaAvenue
J
6
2
1
6
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
42
GloucesterRoad/AshleyDownRoad
S
6
0
3
6
1
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
43
GloucesterRd/QuarringtonRd
J
M
6
1
2
6
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
44
GloucesterRoad/DorianRd
JZ
6
0
1
8
1
0
0
E
SafetyCamerainstalled
05/06
Newsignaljunction
05/06
45
FiltonRd/Monk'sParkAve/TorontoRd
SC
MBJ
8
3
1
9
0
2
0
E
Redlightsafetycamera
06/07
Route
Totals
31sites
260
75
58
291
28
13
0
A
4
46
Portway/PortwayRoundabout
RS
5
1
0
6
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
47
Portway/ParkRoad
RS
5
0
1
5
0
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
48
Portway/BridgeValleyRoad
S
5
0
1
11
1
1
0
N
Investigate
07/08
49
JacobsWellsRd/HotwellRdRAB
R
DJ
12
2
3
14
3
0
0
E
Highwayimprovementsaspartofdevelopment
07/08
50
AnchorRd/Canon'sWay
S
6
1
0
10
2
0
0
E
Highwayimprovementsaspartofdevelopment
06/07
51
TempleGate/StationApproachRd
S
M
9
3
1
10
1
1
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
05/06
52
BathBridgeRdbt/ClarenceRoad
S
RU
6
0
0
7
1
1
0
E
Junction/Signalsimprovements
07/09
53
YorkRd/BathRd
S
RU
7
0
3
8
0
1
0
E
Junction/Signalsimprovements
07/09
54
BathRd/SandyParkRd
SC
12
2
2
12
1
1
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
04/05
55
BathRd/WaterLane
JP
BMJ
7
0
1
18
0
2
0
E
LSScompleted
06/07
56
BristolHill/ChurchHill
JP
MBL
8
1
4
8
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
57
BrislingtonHill
L
MBL
7
2
2
7
2
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
58
BathRd/WestTownLane
SC
DM
18
1
2
31
1
3
0
E
Highwayimprovementsaspartofdevelopment
07/08
59
BathRd/BonvilleRd/BrislingtonRetail
Park
J
5
0
0
5
1
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
60
BathRd/StockwoodRd/EmeryRd
SC
DML
6
1
1
9
1
0
0
E
Digitalredlightsafetycameras
05/06
Route
Totals
15sites
118
14
21
161
15
10
0
The Road Casualty Review 2006
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
56/62
52
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Ref
Route
Location
Type3
Prog4
Accs1
Peds1
Bike1
Cas1
KSI1
Child1
ChildKSI1
Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6
Date
A4018
61
PassageLane/Crowlanerdbt
JR
M
6
0
1
7
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
62
FalcondaleRd/HenburyRd
S
LM
5
1
1
8
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
63
FalcondaleRoad(CanfordLanetoLampeterRoad)
SJL
LM
7
0
0
12
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
64
WestburyRd/Parry'sLane(WhiteTreeRdbt)
RZ
M
9
3
2
9
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
65
WestburyRd/RedlandHill
JZ
6
2
1
6
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
66
BlackboyHill/YorkStreet
L
ML
8
3
2
9
0
2
0
E
Monitor
06/07
67
WhiteladiesRd/WorrallRoad
J
ML
5
1
2
5
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
68
WhiteladiesRd/LwrRedlandRdtoA
psleyRd
J
ML
8
3
4
8
1
0
0
N
Investigate
07/08
69
WhiteladiesRd/Cothamhill
JZP
8
2
3
10
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
70
WhiteladiesRd/AlmaRd
JZ
R
5
2
0
6
1
0
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
04/05
71
WhiteladiesRd(MelrosePlacetoAbe
rdeenRd)
JL
M
6
3
1
6
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
72
WhiteladiesRd(WestParktoBelgraveRd)
JZL
7
1
1
8
0
0
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
05/06
73
WhiteladiesRd/Tyndall'sParkRd/St.P
aul'sRd
S
M
12
3
4
13
1
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
74
WhiteladiesRd/Queen'sRd
JZ
8
2
1
9
0
0
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
05/06
75
TriangleWest/TriangleSouth/BerkeleyPlace
J
12
3
8
12
2
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
76
QueensRoad/Triangle/BerkeleySqua
re
SPLC
LMD
6
4
0
6
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
77
ParkSt/QueenCharlotteStreet
LJ
ML
7
3
3
7
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
78
ParkSt/GreatGeorgeSt
LJ
M
9
4
3
10
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
79
ParkSt/StGeorgesRoad
LJ
M
14
3
7
15
4
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
80
ParkSt/UnitySt
JPL
M
11
5
6
12
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
81
CollegeGreen/Canon'sRd/St.Augustine'sPde
SC
P
27
2
0
2
28
6
2
0
E
Monitor
RouteTotals
21sites
186
6
8
52
206
23
5
0
A403
82
StAndrew'sRoad/King'sWestonLane
J
ML
6
0
1
6
2
0
0
E
M
06/07
RouteT
otals
1Site
6
0
1
6
2
0
0
-
8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council
57/62
53
The Road Casualty Review 2006
Ref
Route
Location
Type
3
Prog
4
Accs
1
Ped
s1
Bike
1
Cas
1
KSI1
Child1
ChildKSI1
Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6
Date
A4032
83
NewfoundlandSt/BondSt
SC
LMD
12
3
1
13
0
0
0
E
BroadmeadDevt
06/07
84
NewfoundlandSt/HoultonSt
S
MD
12
2
1
17
2
0
0
E
BroadmeadDevt
06/07
Rou
teTotals
2sites
24
5
2
30
2
0
0
A4044
85
BondSt(inboundoppositeMcDonalds)
LJ
D
8
1
0
10
0
1
0
E
Monitor
06/07
86
TempleCircusRoundabout
SR
8
0
1
9
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
Rou
teTotals
2sites
16
1
1
19
0
1
0
A4174
87
ParsonStreet/BedminsterRoad
JS
BM
6
1
0
10
1
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
88
ParsonSt/HartcliffeWay
JP
BM
6
1
0
8
0
0
0
E
Monitor
06/07
89
HartcliffeWay/ValeLane
JP
M
5
0
1
5
0
0
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
04/05
90
HartcliffeWay/Nover'sLane
S
7
1
2
9
1
3
0
E
Digitalredlightsafetycamera
05/06
91
HartcliffeWay/HartcliffeRoundabou
t
R
DM
11
0
0
15
0
1
0
E
Highfrictionsurfacing
05/06
92
HartcliffeRoundabout/WhitchurchLa
ne
R
DM