RM ‐ Observation · 2019. 1. 21. · Structured Interviews Unstructured interviews...

3
1.7 observations RGA.notebook 1 February 07, 2018 Starter Slide &ODVVURRP ([SHFWDWLRQV $UULYH RQ WLPH &RDW RII %DJV RII GHVNV (TXLSPHQW 3ODQQHU RQ GHVNV 7,7/( '$7( 50 2EVHUYDWLRQV 5(&$3 6859(<6 96 LOs 2EMHFWLYH .H\ :RUGV .QRZ 8QGHUVWDQG How will you display SMSC today? Courage ‐ Respect ‐ Friendship ‐ Inspiration ‐ Determination ‐ Equality ‐ Excellence Empathy – Courtesy – Resilience ‐ Etiquette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ct 1513:19 &29(57 2EVHUYDWLRQ 29(57 2EVHUYDWLRQ 3$57,&,3$17 2EVHUYDWLRQ 1213$57,&,3$17 2EVHUYDWLRQ 7\SHV RI 2EVHUYDWLRQV Oct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ay 917:52 ,QWHUSUHWLYLVWV IDYRXU SDUWLFLSDQW REVHUYDWLRQV EHFDXVH WKH\ VHH LW DV WKH EHVW ZD\ WR XQGHUVWDQG RWKHU SHRSOH WR JHW LQVLGH WKHLU KHDGV 7KLV XQGHUVWDQGLQJ LV FDOOHG 9HUVWHKHQ .H\ ZRUG 'HILQLWLRQ $Q XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI RWKHU SHRSOHV PRWLYDWLRQV DQG IHHOLQJV GHYHORSHG WKURXJK HPSDWK\ RU FORVH LGHQWLILFDWLRQ EXAM ANSWER EXAMPLE? ,QWHUSUHWLYLVW VRFLRORJLVWV IDYRXU TXDOLWDWLYH PHWKRGV VXFK DV SDUWLFLSDQW REVHUYDWLRQV EHFDXVH WKH\ FDQ GHYHORS YHUVWHKHQ DQG WKHUHIRUH JLYH PRUH YDOLG GDWD May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

Transcript of RM ‐ Observation · 2019. 1. 21. · Structured Interviews Unstructured interviews...

Page 1: RM ‐ Observation · 2019. 1. 21. · Structured Interviews Unstructured interviews Non‐participant observation Participant observation May 1007:22 Comparing different strengths

1.7 observations RGA.notebook

1

February 07, 2018

Starter Slide

Classroom Expectations:

Arrive on time

Coat off

Bags off desks

Equipment & Planner on desks

TITLE: DATE: 2/02RM ‐ Observations

RECAP: SURVEYS VS

LOs

Objective Key WordsKnow

Understand

How will you display SMSC today?Courage ‐ Respect ‐ Friendship ‐ Inspiration ‐ Determination ‐ 

Equality ‐ ExcellenceEmpathy – Courtesy – Resilience  ‐ 

Etiquette

TITLE: DATE:

To give reasons and evidence for your views (ext: to consider alternative opinions and views)

To spot patterns and explain what's happening

Is sociological research worthwhile? Can we find out anything meaningful from it?

The Big Question:

Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3EDUCATION & RM FAMILIES & BELIEFS CRIME

What are observations? ParticipantNon‐participant

To what extent are observations useful for sociologists?

CovertOvert

How are observations designed and carried out?

ValidityReliabilityRepresentativeness

2/02RM ‐ Observations

Oct 15­13:19

COVERT Observation

OVERT Observation

PARTICIPANT Observation

NON‐PARTICIPANT Observation

Types of Observations

Oct 15­13:19

Participant ObservationKey word Definition

Involves the researcher actually joining a group or community that they are studying, and participating in its activities in order to gain insight into and understanding of the group.

Which theorists are likely to favour participant observation?

Can you think of any potential PROBLEMS?

Venkatesh (2009) spent 18 months over 7 years, with crack‐dealing street gangs in Chicago. This has become a classic example of overt participant observation.

Why might this have been useful?

Venkatesh was able to gain a real insight.

May 9­17:52

Interpretivists favour participant observations because they see it as the best way to understand other people ‐ to get inside their heads. This understanding is called...

VerstehenKey word Definition

An understanding of other people's motivations and feelings developed through empathy or close identification.

EXAM ANSWER EXAMPLE?Interpretivist sociologists favour qualitative methods such as participant observations because they can develop verstehen, and therefore give more valid data.

May 9­17:56

The stages of participant observation

Getting In

Staying In

Getting out

Key word Definition

Covert RoleWhere the researcher conceals their identity from the group being studied, to gain access and avoid disrupting normal behaviour.

Key word Definition

Overt RoleWhere the researcher reveals to the group being studied his or her true identity and purpose.

Depending on the researcher's role, they may or may not be able to easily access and join the group being studied.

A covert role is likely when deviant activities are being studied (think 'going undercover') although an overt role is maybe 'easier' (and safer) for the researcher.

The observer must develop their role or relationship in a way that allows them to continue. This can be hard when they need to record data and maintain trust.

It can be difficult to leave the group without damaging relationships. There could be reprisals for criminal activities, or breached trust if the participation was covert.

Page 2: RM ‐ Observation · 2019. 1. 21. · Structured Interviews Unstructured interviews Non‐participant observation Participant observation May 1007:22 Comparing different strengths

1.7 observations RGA.notebook

2

February 07, 2018

May 3­07:09

The sociologist gains first hand, primary knowledge. With trust, more deep valid data can be obtained.

The researcher is unlikely to impose their own views or bias on the group, so data is more valid.

Sociologists can 'learn answers to questions they never would have asked' ‐ it allows the research to change in response to the evidence.

Best way to achieve verstehen and valid understanding.

It may be the only possible research method for criminal and deviant activities.

People are studied in a natural environment, therefore it's more valid.

People are studied over time, which makes the data more representative (at least of the group being studied)

Advantages of participant

observations

May 3­07:09

Positivists say there is no good way to test or check findings (can't repeat easily ‐ unreliable)

A researcher's own interpretations may be very important (leading to invalidity and bias)

The personality and characteristics of the researcher are too important ‐ the method isn't reliable.

The Hawthorne effect ‐ if the researcher is overt.

Going native ‐ the researcher can become so involved that they can't be an objective observer anymore.

Time consuming and expensive.

Small group studied so unrepresentative

Ethical issues ‐ if covert, then no consent is given. Even if overt, if knowledge is gained of criminal activities there is an ethical and legal problem.

Disadvantages of participant observation

Oct 15­13:19

Non‐Participant ObservationKey word Definition

Involves the researcher observing the group, without participating in the activities being studied.

In what ways might non‐participant observation be better than participant observation?Advantages of

non‐participant observations

Disadvantages of non‐participant

observation

• Reduces the risk that the presence of the researcher will affect the group.• Allows the researcher to investigate uncooperative groups.• Lets the researcher observe people in their normal social situation; avoids the hawthorne effect.

• Reduces the understanding of the meanings people attach to the behaviour being observed; it's harder to achieve verstehen.• The data produced may only reflect the researcher's assumptions about observed behaviour.• Covert observations are still unethical.

May 10­07:22

Comparing different strengths and weaknessesN

um

ber

of p

art

icip

ant

s in

volv

ed

Level of involvement of the researcher

Complete the graph in your books, using the research methods we've covered

Remember to include:

Postal Questionnaires

Questionnaires

Structured Interviews

Unstructured interviews

Non‐participant observation

Participant observation

May 10­07:22

Comparing different strengths and weaknesses

Va

lidit

y of

the

da

ta

Awareness of the participants

Complete the graph in your books, using the research methods we've covered

Remember to include:

(unaware) (Fully informed)

Covert participant observation

Overt participant observation

Covert non‐participant obs.

Overt non‐participant obs.

Lab experiments

Field experiments

Feb 1­11:03

Methods in Context: Exam Question

Some sociologists have pointed to the ease with which traditional gender identities can be reinforced in classroom interaction. verbal abuse and other more subtle processes such as the 'male gaze' can have an impact on gender identity. Sociologist have found that some male teachers may even collude with male pupils in 'putting down' girls. Sociologists may use non‐participant observation to investigate the ways in which classroom interactions reinforce traditional gender identities. observing classroom behaviour at first hand enables researchers to see what actually goes on rather than getting a verbal account after the event. There is also the potential for greater insight through direct experience of classroom interaction. However, it is very difficult for the observer to avoid being noticed and this can affect the behaviour both of teachers and of pupils.

Applying material from Item A and your knowledge of research methods, evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of non‐participant observation for the study of the ways in which classroom interactions reinforce traditional gender identities. [20 marks]

Page 3: RM ‐ Observation · 2019. 1. 21. · Structured Interviews Unstructured interviews Non‐participant observation Participant observation May 1007:22 Comparing different strengths

1.7 observations RGA.notebook

3

February 07, 2018

Feb 1­14:57 Plenary

PPQ practice

PLENARY

Objective Key Words

Know

Understand

TITLE: DATE: /02/2017RM ‐ Observation

To give reasons and evidence for your views (ext: to consider alternative opinions and views)

To spot patterns and explain what's happening

What are observations ParticipantNon‐participant

To what extent are observations useful for sociologists?

CovertOvert

How are observations designed and carried out?

ValidityReliabilityRepresentativeness

1) Outline two advantages of using participant observation in research (10 marks)

What to include:2 paragraphs‐Each advantage needs examples (real or made up)‐Fully explain why the advantage is good, linked to PERVERT