Riverside Schools State Report Card 2009 - Painesville

To meet a test indicator for grades3-8 and10, at least 75% of studentstested must score proficient or higher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; AttendanceRate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2008-2009 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent








3rd Grade Achievement1. Reading2. Mathematics

4th Grade Achievement3. Reading4. Mathematics5. Writing

5th Grade Achievement6. Reading7. Mathematics8. Science9. Social Studies

6th Grade Achievement10. Reading11. Mathematics

7th Grade Achievement12. Reading13. Mathematics14. Writing

8th Grade Achievement15. Reading16. Mathematics17. Science18. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)19. Reading20. Mathematics21. Writing22. Science23. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)24. Reading25. Mathematics26. Writing27. Science28. Social Studies

Attendance Rate29. All Grades

2007-08 Graduation Rate30. District



The six designations are• Excellent with Distinction• Excellent• Effective• Continuous Improvement• Academic Watch• Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2008-2009 school year showsthe progress districts have madebased on four measures ofperformance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your District’sDesignation: Number of State

IndicatorsMet out of 30

PerformanceIndex

StateIndicators Performance

Index

Value-AddedMeasure

Your District2008-2009

Similar Districts2008-2009

State2008-2009

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

StateIndicators

District Improvement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

Similar Districts are based on comparing demographic, socioeconomicand geographic factors. Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.***-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

98.1 %95.5 %95.7 %95.7 %96.3 %

95.2 %

93.0 %

IRN # 047894

Effective27 99.0

Not Met

At Risk

Riverside Local School District585 Riverside Dr, Painesville, OH 44077-5323 - Lake County

Current Superintendent: James P. Kalis (440) 352-0668

87.1 %89.9 %

89.4 %89.4 %89.4 %

85.1 %76.3 %83.1 %73.5 %

88.7 %80.2 %

85.3 %82.5 %89.2 %

74.3 %77.4 %75.1 %52.5 %

91.2 %90.4 %94.1 %90.2 %89.7 %

88.7 %90.8 %

77.4 %81.3 %

92.1 %90.3 %92.8 %

82 %78.4 %84.4 %

85.3 %77.6 %85.5 %77.6 %

72 %62.3 %70.6 %61.6 %

81.3 %75.2 %

90.9 %88.5 %

76.6 %74.3 %80.5 %

87.8 %85.5 %89.9 %

72.4 %70.6 %62.8 %51.1 %

83.7 %84.6 %78.0 %66.2 %

84.5 %81.4 %89.7 %76 %

81.6 %

92.3 %91.0 %95.6 %89.5 %91.7 %

92.8 %88.4 %93.2 %84.2 %88.6 %

94.3 %

84.6 %

97.5 %95.7 %97.6 %94.3 %95.7 %

95.6 %

96.5 %

= met

2

All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.

The StateIndicators are

based on stateassessments, as wellas on attendance andgraduation rates.To earn an indicatorfor Achievement orGraduation Tests, atleast75% of studentsmust reach proficientor above for the givenassessment.For the 11th grade OhioGraduation Tests indicators,a cumulative85%passagerate for each assessmentis required.

StateIndicators

Your District’s Assessment Results Over Time

Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.*

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

3rd Grade Achievement

89.9 88.8 87.1 93.9 90.7 89.9

--------------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

Writing06-07 07-08 08-09

4th Grade Achievement

92.3 90.0 89.4 89.6 84.0 89.4 90.7 87.5 89.4

------------------------------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Science

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

Mathematics06-07 07-08 08-09

Social Studies06-07 07-08 08-09


88.0 82.1 85.1 76.6 73.6 76.3 82.9 79.0 83.1 67.6 75.6 73.5

------------------------------------------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09


86.3 88.0 88.7 82.7 83.9 80.2

--------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09


Writing

89.2 87.4 85.3 81.7 75.0 82.5 90.9 92.5 89.2

--------------------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09


Writing06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

Social Studies

84.4 86.0 74.3 74.5 81.7 77.4 69.4 71.6 75.1 57.0 50.1 52.5

------------------------------------------------------------

State

Standard-75

%

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)

Reading WritingMathematics Science Social Studies

91.4 94.5 91.2 86.1 88.4 90.4 93.7 90.8 94.1 82.6 83.3 90.2 80.4 87.3 89.7

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State

Standard-85

%

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)

06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09

Reading WritingMathematics Science Social Studies

*

96.7 95.1 98.1 95.0 92.3 95.5 96.9 95.1 95.7 93.3 91.8 95.7 95.0 92.6 96.3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Riverside Local School District, Lake County


Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled inthe district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Your District’s Performance Index

3

Overall Composite Scores reflect grade level and overall compositeratings for the 2008-2009 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics


Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at apoint in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of

progress has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; “Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+ AboveExpected Growth

MetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled inthe district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Your District’s Performance Index

0.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

Accelerated

Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievement of every studentenrolled for the fullacademicyear. The Performance Index

is a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight ofzero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007

Performance Index Over Time

0.1

3.9

12.5

35.4

27.8

20.3

1.2

7.5

35.4

30.6

24.3

99.0 98.2 98.4

99.0


+ + - -

+ + - -

0.0

AttendanceRate:

4

Grades 3-8 and 10Reading

andMathematics

Adequate YearlyProgress

All Studen

ts

Perc

entP

rofic

ient

Perc

entT

este

d

Econ

omica

llyDisa

dvantag

ed

Asian/Pac

ificIsl

ander

Black, n

on-Hisp

anic

America

n Indian/Alas

ka Native

Hispan

ic

Multi-Rac

ial

White, n

on-Hisp

anic

Students

withDisa

bilities

Limite

d Engli

shProf

icient

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisticallyreliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

ReadingProficiency:

MathematicsProficiency:

ReadingParticipation:

MathematicsParticipation:

AttendanceRate:

AYP Determinationby Indicator

GraduationRate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every schooland district must meet AYP goals that are set for Reading and Mathematics

Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet

Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the state’s rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determinationby Subgroup

AYPDetermination

for Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) making improvement over the previous year.

* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

Black,non-Hispanic

HispanicWhite,

non-Hispanic

Asian orPacific Islander

American Indian/Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial

Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates of your district are provided forinformational purposes only and are not used for your AYP determination.

Students withDisabilities

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met


Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Not Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

0% >95% 88.9% 88.7%

50% >95% 33.3% 70.8% 94%

Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states arerequired to reportcertain data aboutschools and teachers.Data presented hereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designationfor districts andschools.

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies





Black,non-Hispanic

AmericanIndian/

Alaska Native

Asian orPacificIslander

Hispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-Hispanic

Non-DisabledStudents

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

Non-Econ.

Disadvtgd

Econ.Disadvtgd

LimitedEnglish

ProficientFemale Male

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced

State and Federally Required District Information5

Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations

Your District State

All Schools inYour District

High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor’s Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Master’s Degree

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

*High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentageof economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile.

Federally Required School Teacher Information

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

Average DailyStudent

Enrollment

Black,non-

Hispanic

AmericanIndian or

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-

Hispanic

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrantEconomically

DisadvantagedLimitedEnglish

Proficient

Your District’s Students 2008-2009

--

4703 1.7% -- 1.1% 1.7% 2.3% 93.1% 21.4% 0.8% 11.1% --


100.0

66.8

0.0

100.0

99.3

59.3

1.8

98.7

15.110.020.839.439.4

----------

0.0--

0.0----

14.35.09.50.0

17.4

8.35.6

11.70.0

13.6

3.41.34.51.56.0

1.80.41.90.33.4

19.69.3

29.29.7

27.8

----------

2.30.83.51.05.0

9.33.9

10.43.3

12.0

2.20.44.50.75.0

40.9--

22.7----

5.32.65.42.27.8

----------

7.4--

7.4----

19.05.0

23.821.717.4

11.722.216.736.427.3

10.17.3

10.914.421.2

7.64.89.5

12.820.8

32.427.926.136.127.8

----------

9.16.49.4

12.018.9

14.911.718.829.932.0

18.2--

40.9----

8.24.5

11.317.022.5

12.510.711.414.620.9

43.445.035.827.324.2

----------

44.4--

40.7----

35.745.035.734.821.7

53.338.941.736.427.3

40.240.736.728.622.4

41.540.138.529.522.6

32.144.224.423.622.2

----------

39.439.336.328.322.5

44.145.539.330.722.8

27.3--

18.2----

39.431.937.029.621.9

41.449.536.828.023.2

13.225.017.012.1

9.1

----------

25.9--

37.0----

19.040.014.330.417.4

13.327.815.027.327.3

27.646.322.933.120.4

29.750.624.634.221.7

4.410.1

6.120.8

9.0

----------

28.649.124.634.921.4

20.533.815.223.715.4

9.1--

13.6----

29.357.023.631.820.3

24.534.221.633.320.0

15.115.0

9.418.218.2

13.25.0

17.03.09.1

----------

22.2--

14.8----

11.95.0

16.713.026.1

13.35.6

15.00.04.5

18.74.4

24.922.430.1

19.44.1

25.423.131.4

11.58.5

14.29.7

13.2

----------

20.54.4

26.323.832.1

11.25.2

16.412.417.8

4.5--

4.5----

20.96.1

23.620.930.3

16.23.0

24.722.028.1

0.0 -- 0.0

6

Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.

Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for twoconsecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement

Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008

Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source

EMIS - Education Management Information System of the Ohio Department of Education

ACT College Entrance Exam - Nonprofit organization that administers theACT college entrance test

College Board (SAT) - Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam

AP - Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that providestudents the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities

Legend

The Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreport on the completion of a rigorous curriculum and otherindicators of student success that ensure students leaveschool with the knowledge and skills needed to succeed incollege, careers and citizenship. These indicators pertain toschools that have any combination of grades 10, 11 and 12.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationally representative and continuingassesssubject areas. Schools and students within each state are selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students in the state or in a particular school take the assessment.

, and there are no individual student or even schoolsummary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing,the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.

To view Ohio’s most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for key word “NAEP”gov

93.0


Riverside Jr/Sr High School 3

1086

82

69.1

17

27.3

15.6

22

%

%

%

%

%

=

=

=

=

=

=

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutiveyears and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated nohigher than Continuous Improvement.

3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on thepreliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added,the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluatedto determine the impact (if any) on the district’s finaldesignation.

1. If your district’s rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met byyour district and your district’s performance index. AYPthen is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affectthe preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation

94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9%

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

ContinuousImprovement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years


Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years







Excellent


Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency


Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your district’s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determining your district’s report carddesignation is amulti-step process. The first step is todetermine apreliminary designation,which is basedon the following components: 1) the percentage of indicatorsmet, 2) the performance index and3)AYPdetermination.

7


8

Ohio Department of Education Report Card Resources on the Web:reportcard.ohio.gov


Riverside Schools State Report Card 2009 - Painesville

Documents

Transcript of Riverside Schools State Report Card 2009 - Painesville