Risk of skin cancer following phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: retrospective cohort study
description
Transcript of Risk of skin cancer following phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: retrospective cohort study
Risk of skin cancer following phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: retrospective
cohort study David H Brewster,1,2 Janet S Tucker,3,4 Michael Fleming,1 Carole Morris,1 Diane L Stockton,1 David J Lloyd,3,4 Sohinee Bhattacharya,3,4 James WT Chalmers1,2
1Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland
2University of Edinburgh
3University of Aberdeen
4Aberdeen Maternity Hospital
Colorectal Cancer Study Day
Stirling
13 September 2012
How Scotland compares to other countries
Outline
• Risk factors• Mortality• Incidence• Survival
Risk factors / protective factors (1)
Family history and inherited conditions• Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)• Hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or
Lynch syndrome)• Ashkenazi Jewish background
Other medical conditions• Ulcerative colitis• Crohn's disease• Diabetes mellitus• Acromegaly• PMH of large bowel cancer, endometrial cancer,
testicular cancer, or lymphoma• PMH of cholecystectomy• PMH of organ transplant
Risk factors / protective factors (2)
Diet• Red and processed meat increase risk• Fruit, vegetable, fibre decrease risk• Calcium may reduce risk
Other factors• Age• Excess weight increases risk• Alcohol probably increases risk• Smoking (long-term) may increase risk• Physical activity decreases risk• Aspirin (and other NSAIDs) probably decrease risk• HRT and OC may decrease risk• Vitamin D may decrease risk• Screening reduces risk of dying from colorectal cancer
(and endoscopic screening reduces incidence)
Population Age-standardised incidence rate
Slovakia (1998-2002) 52.5
France, Bas-Rhin (1998-2002) 48.7
Australia, Victoria (1998-2002) 48.3
Singapore: Chinese (1998-2002) 46.0
Italy, Varese Province (1998-2000) 43.4
UK, Scotland (1998-2002) 43.1
Canada (1998-2002) 42.6
Norway (1998-2002) 40.7
The Netherlands (1998-2002) 39.8
Spain, Navarra (1998-2002) 39.4
Denmark (1998-2002) 39.3
USA, SEER (9 Registries): White (1998-2002) 37.9
Japan, Osaka Prefecture (1998-2002) 37.4
Sweden (1998-2002) 30.0
Finland (1998-2002) 25.6
Source: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume IX
Colorectal cancer (males)
Population Age-standardised incidence rate
Australia, Victoria (1998-2002) 33.1
Norway (1998-2002) 32.7
Singapore: Chinese (1998-2002) 31.7
Denmark (1998-2002) 29.8
Canada (1998-2002) 29.4
The Netherlands (1998-2002) 28.7
USA, SEER (9 Registries): White (1998-2002) 27.9
Italy, Varese Province (1998-2000) 27.5
UK, Scotland (1998-2002) 27.5
Slovakia (1998-2002) 26.7
France, Bas-Rhin (1998-2002) 26.1
Switzerland, Geneva (1998-2002) 24.9
Sweden (1998-2002) 23.4
Spain, Navarra (1998-2002) 22.1
Japan, Osaka Prefecture (1998-2002) 21.7
Finland (1998-2002) 19.5
Source: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume IX
Colorectal cancer (females)
Age-standardised relative survival from colorectal cancer by survival time and period of diagnosis
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1983-1987 1988-1992 1993-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007
Period of diagnosis
% s
urv
iva
l
1-year
3-year
5-year10-year
Some factors to consider in population-based survival comparisons
Data quality factors Tumour-related factors
Population coverage Extent of diseaseCompleteness of ascertainment Site (and sub-site) of tumour Accuracy of registration Tumour morphology Completeness of follow-up Tumour biology ‘Death certificate only’ registrations
Host factors Health care-related factors
Age ScreeningSex Diagnostic facilitiesSocio-economic status Treatment facilitiesRace/Ethnicity Quality of treatmentCo-morbidity Follow-up careMortality from other causesBehaviour
Colorectal cancer diagnosed 1995-99. Five year relative survival vs survival conditional on surviving at least one year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
5-year Relative survival Conditional survival
% s
urv
ivin
g Denmark
England
Scotland
Finland
Norway
Sweden
Colorectal cancer diagnosed 2002: the delay-survival paradox
The waiting time paradox: the colorectal cancer example…
Source: Torring ML et.al. Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care.Br J Cancer 2011;104:934–40.
Risk of skin cancer following phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: retrospective
cohort study David H Brewster,1,2 Janet S Tucker,3,4 Michael Fleming,1 Carole Morris,1 Diane L Stockton,1 David J Lloyd,3,4 Sohinee Bhattacharya,3,4 James WT Chalmers1,2
1Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland
2University of Edinburgh
3University of Aberdeen
4Aberdeen Maternity Hospital
Our statistics on incidence, survival, and mortality, and on the prevalence of lifestyle risk factors suggest that we can
So how does Scotland compare to other countries, and can we do better?