Risk-Informing ESBWR Design with Probabilistic Safety ... · Risk-Informing ESBWR Design with...

13
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved Risk-Informing ESBWR Design with Probabilistic Safety Assessments Gary Miller Senior Application Engineer INPRO Dialogue Forum November 19-23, 2013 1

Transcript of Risk-Informing ESBWR Design with Probabilistic Safety ... · Risk-Informing ESBWR Design with...

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

Risk-Informing ESBWR

Design with Probabilistic

Safety Assessments

Gary Miller Senior Application Engineer

INPRO Dialogue Forum

November 19-23, 2013

1

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

ESBWR Probabilistic Safety Assessments

2

INPRO Criteria Evaluated:

• IN 1.3.1 Calculated frequency of design basis events • IN 1.6.1 Independence of different levels of defense in depth • IN 4.4.1 Use of a risk-informed approach

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 1.3.1: Calculated frequency of occurrence of design basis accidents

3

Acceptance Limit: Reduced frequency of accidents that can cause plant damage relative to existing facilities. Background: Development and use of a PSA in the ESBWR design process allowed the designers to assess design options that reduced the risks of core damage and radiological release. Extensive use of operating experience and advanced light water reactor design principles (e.g. passive safety) have significantly reduced the plant risks.

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 1.3.1: Calculated frequency of occurrence of design basis accidents

4

Example 1: Comparison of Core Damage Frequencies

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E-04

Regulatory Goal Reference BWR 6 ABWR ESBWR

Internal Events CDF

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 1.3.1: Calculated frequency of occurrence of design basis accidents

5

Example 2: Contributions to Core Damage Frequency Internal Events Accident Sequence Frequency (/a)

Reference BWR ABWR ESBWR

Station Blackout 3.9 E-06 1.1 E-07 <1 E-09

ATWS 1.1 E-07 3 E-10 3 E-09

Transient

Condition

1.9 E-08 4.5 E-08 6 E-9

LOCA <1 E-08 7 E-09 7 E-09

Safety

Architecture

2 Divisions 3 Divisions 4 Divisions +

Passive

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 1.6.1 Independence of different levels of defense in depth (DID)

6

Acceptance Limit: Adequate independence is demonstrated, e.g., through deterministic and probabilistic means… Background: The ESBWR design incorporates independence between accident mitigation and severe accident management Example: PSA severe accident insights were used to develop the Basemat internal Melt and Coolability (BiMAC) device

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 1.6.1 Independence of different levels of defense in depth (DID)

7

Defense Levels 1 Prevention of abnormal operation and failures 2 Control of abnormal operation and detection of failures

3 Control of accidents within the design basis 4 Control of severe plant conditions, including prevention of accident progression and mitigation of the consequences of severe accidents 5 Mitigation of radiological consequences of significant releases of radioactive materials

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

BiMAC concept

BiMAC designed to: • Passively quench high

temperature corium • Mitigate core-concrete

reactions • Controlled by an

independent logic platform

BiMAC - Basemat internal Melt Arrest and Coolability

8

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 4.4.1 Risk-informed approach

9

Acceptance Limit: A careful use of risk informed approaches based on proven data sets has been performed by the designer

Background: Insights from the ESBWR PSA have been used to implement several design enhancements, and consequently, have contributed a significant improvement to nuclear safety.

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 4.4.1 Risk-informed approach

10

Example 1 - PSA used in ESBWR design: Added redundant, physically separated flow paths in response to fire analysis. Alternative cooling system Fail-safe actuation of ICS

Added parallel injection line valves for ICS to eliminate a dependency on power supplies. Changed fire suppression piping route to reduce room flooding frequency.

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

Isolation Condenser System - Standby

11

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

IN 4.4.1 Risk-informed approach

12

Example 2 – Operator Actions PSA was intentionally pessimistic on estimating Human Error Probabilities No recovery actions are credited Identify PSA accident sequences where operator actions are important, and then improve them with physical design changes

Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved

References

13

ESBWR

Safety Evaluation Report (NRC): http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1034/ML103470210.html

Design Certification Document (DCD) Rev. 9: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1034/ML103440266.html

NEDO-33201, Revision 6, Probabilistic Risk Assessment ESBWR Design Certification http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1028/ML102880536.html

NRC Final Design Approval: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1105/ML110540310.pdf

Reference BWR (Grand Gulf NPP) NUREG-1150

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1150/