Risk and Lean Initiatives in Extended Supply Chains and Lean Initiatives... · Lean and Six Sigma...
Transcript of Risk and Lean Initiatives in Extended Supply Chains and Lean Initiatives... · Lean and Six Sigma...
Risk and Lean Initiatives in
Extended Supply Chains Chad Kymal, CTO, Omnex Inc.
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
www.omnex.com
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan with offices in major global markets.
• In 1995-97 provided global roll out supplier training and development for Ford Motor Company to support their emerging market strategy.
• Trained more than 100,000 individuals in over 30 countries.
• Workforce of over 500 professionals, speaking over 18 languages.
• Former Delegation Leader of the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) responsible for ISO/TS16949.
• Served on committees that wrote QOS, ISO 9001:2000, QS-9000 and its Semiconductor Supplement, and ISO IWA 1 (ISO 9000 for healthcare).
• Member of AIAG manual writing committees for FMEA, SPC, MSA, Sub-tier Supplier Development, Error Proofing, and Effective Problem Solving (EPS).
• Provider of Lean and Six Sigma to the Automotive Industry as a partner of AIAG
About Omnex
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.2
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Presenter — Chad Kymal
3 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
• Chad is the CTO and founder of Omnex Inc., an international consulting and training organization headquartered in the United States. He spent a number of years working at General Motors and KPMG prior to founding Omnex Inc. in 1986.
• Chad and Omnex have helped improve the supply chains in the Automotive, Semiconductor, and Aerospace industries. In the late 1990s Omnex worked with Ford Motor Company in support of their Emerging Market Strategy. Omnex is also a provider of Lean and Six Sigma services for AIAG members globally and has implemented and continues to implement Lean and Six Sigma programs worldwide.
• In addition to a bachelor’s degree from General Motors Institute, Chad holds both a master’s degree in industrial and operations engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from the University of Michigan. He has published numerous papers and seven books on the subjects of Management Standards, Quality and performance improvement. Chad also is a founder of American Quality Standards Registrars (AQSR) and Software provider Omnex Systems.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Introduction to Risk and Lean & Six Sigma Concepts
• Defining Risk, Lean and Six Sigma
• Risk in an Extended Supply Chain
• Case Studies on Risk
• Changes in the Supply Base and Balance of Power
Table of Contents
4 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Extended Supply Chains
The Automotive supply chains extend globally to every hemisphere. The semiconductor and electronics supply chain extend to the US, Europe, SE Asia, Taiwan, and China.
The Aerospace supply chain is based more in the US and Europe, but is quickly moving into China and India.
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.5
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Extended Supply Chain – Loaf of Bread
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.6
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• 157 ISO standards use the word “risk” and together have 45 unique definitions (21 specialized to hazards)
• Of these, most only consider events with negative outcomes:
– “A function of the probability of occurrence of a given threat and the potential adverse consequences of that threat's occurrence”
• There is a subset that takes a broader view of risk, for example:
– “The effect of uncertainty” (ISO 9000:2015)
– “The combination of the probability of occurrence or harm and the severity of harm” (ISO 13485:2016)
– These are consistent with PMBOK definition “uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or negative effect on a project's objectives”*
What is Risk?
7 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
*Source: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Fourth Edition
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Risk – Effect of Uncertainty
• Note 1 – An Effect is a deviation from the expected, positive or negative
• Note 2 – Uncertainty is the state, even partial, of deficiency or information related to understanding or knowledge of an event, its consequence and likelihood
• Note3 – Risk is often characterized by reference to potential events and consequence or a combination of these
• Note 4 – Risk is often expressed in terms of a combination of the consequences of an event and the associated likelihood of occurrence
• Note 5 – Risk is often used when there is the possibility of only negative consequences
Definition of Risk in Automotive, Aerospace, and Semiconductors
8 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Risk is defined as Severity x Occurrence
• Risk with Controls used Severity x Occurrence x Detection – this is known as residual risk
• Risk mitigation is often focused on items with High Severity, High Risk, or High Residual Risk
Typical Risk Table – Used in the Automotive Industry
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.9
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• What do we see as the typical risks in the supply chain? Let us know from your company’s perspective…
Typical Risks in an Extended Supply Chain (Discussion)
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.10
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Maximizes “value-added” content
– Define value in the eyes of the Customer
– Eliminate waste
• Optimizes “flow”
– Cost of Poor Flow
– Pull systems
– One piece flow
What is Lean?
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.11
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Extra Handling & StorageCosts
Expediting Costs
PremiumFreight Charges
Late Deliveries
Long Lead-times
Cost to Customer
Excess Inventory
Excess Scrap & Rework
Excess Capacity
Lost Customer loyalty
Excess Labor Costs
Opportunity cost if salesPotential is greater than
Current capacity
Cost of Poor Flow (COPF) We Only See the Tip of the Iceberg
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.12
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Lean – Value Added vs. Non Value Added
13 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Value Added – 5%
Non Value Added –
Waiting time, inspection, setup time…others
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Inventory – Sleeping money
• Defects – Cost to find, fix or replace
• Transportation of Parts & Materials
• Unnecessary Motions
• Unnecessary Operations
• Waste of Waiting
• Waste of Overproduction
• Waste of Human Potential
Waste or “Muda”
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.14
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Implement Continuous Flow Processing
• Work Cells
• Use Pull not Push Scheduling
• Supermarket Pull With Kanban
• Level Demand
• Heijunka
• Control Quality at the Source
• Source Control & Error proofing
• Develop Flexible Production Equipment
• Quick changeovers – SMED
• Manage Overall Equipment Effectiveness
• Total Productive Maintenance
Lean Strategies
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.15
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Six Sigma is a systematic, scientific, fact-based, data-driven breakthrough process
Systematic:– Projects follow the Six Sigma process
What is Six Sigma?
16 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
ControlImproveAnalyzeMeasureDefine
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Six Sigma is a systematic, scientific, fact based, data-driven breakthrough processWhat Kind of Problems?
– Large, usually more than $150,000 annual savings
– Cross-functional
– Problems affecting major company Y’s
• Market Share
• Growth
• Profitability
– Problems that have been worked on before
What is Six Sigma?
17 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Y= f(x)
WWW.OMNEX.COM
DMAIC Tollgate Process
18 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
ControlImproveAnalyzeMeasureDefine
• Project proposal and
selection
• Building your team
• Building a sense of
urgency
• Define customer
requirements
• Tollgate presentation
• Select project Y
• Data collection
• Display data
• Compute Process
Sigma
• Tollgate presentation
• Identify possible
causes
• Narrow to root cause
• Quantify opportunities
• Tollgate presentation
• Identify and test
solutions
• Refine solutions
• Pilot solutions
• Cost benefit analysis
• Tollgate presentation
• Process control plan
• Plan and implement
• Align systems and
structures
• Close and hand-off
project
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Quality engineeringand administration
Inspection/test (materials,equipment, labor)
Expediting
Scrap
Rework
Rejects Warranty
claims
Maintenance and service
Cost to customer
Excess inventory
Additional
labor hours
Longer cycle times
Quality auditsVendor control
Lost customer loyalty
Improvement program costs
Process control
Opportunity cost if salesgreater than plant
capacity
Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.19
We Only See the Tip of the Iceberg
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Cost of Poor Quality and Flow
20 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
“The cost of a LOST CUSTOMER is THE GREATEST COST OF ALL!”
– Dr. W.E. Deming
COPQ/F Inventory
(% of Sales) Sigma PPM Turns Competitive Position
40-50% 2.0 308,537 8 to 10 Non Competitive
30-40% 3.0 66,807 10 to 20 Average Company
20-30% 4.0 6,210 20 to 50
10-20% 5.0 233 50 to 100
< 10% 6.0 3.4 100 Plus World Class
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Business demands reduced cost, improved quality, reduced lead times and new innovative products and packages.
• Lean means speed and improved flow
• Six Sigma means less variability and fewer defects
• Lean Six Sigma combination of projects requiring improved flow and reduced defects
– Lean Six Sigma is the use of Lean and/or Six Sigma techniques within a DMAIC-driven process
Lean Six Sigma
21 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Discussion on Savings with Lean and Six Sigma
22 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Measure Baseline Current Future
R.T.Yield 50% improv.
Process Leadtime 50% improv
Head Count 50% improv
Inventory in Days 50% improv
Floor Space 50% improv
Difference Green Belt Black Belt
Savings of Project $50,000 to $90,000 Greater than $150,000
Implementation Effort Lesser Effort Greater Effort
Duration 2 to 3 months 4 to 6 months
Workshop Days 7 days 20 days
Cost to Company ½ of Black Belt
Savings $1 to 2 Million (up to 15 projects)
$1.5 Million to $4 Million (up to 15 projects)
Project Local Cross-functional
Discussion on most successful initiatives
Extended Supply Chain Lean
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Risk in an Extended Supply Chain
23 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
New Product Development – Risk of Poor Quality, Late Prototypes and PPAP/FAI
Risk of unsafe products – Toyota braking system and Samsung battery
Risk of Poor Quality and Delivery
Reputational Risk – Volkswagen
What is Risk?
WWW.OMNEX.COM
New Product Development Risk Mitigation – Supply Chain One supplier in the
supply chain can hold up a product launch- Product or Process
problems can equally cause problems
Most organizations do not have visibility beyond one tier
What tools do we use? How can we get more visibility and mitigate risk further
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.24
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Project and Supplier Risk: Conducted during initial RFP/RFQ. (Supplier Risk, Project Risk, Feasibility Risk (S), Capacity Risk (S))Only for the Tier One? Story of the Automotive Battery Supplier in China.
– There is no Lean or Six Sigma Evaluation required by the supplier or customer
• New Product Launch Tracking: Timing and completion of deliverables and use of Quality of the Event Checklists
– The supplier is required to implement DFSS (Design for Six Sigma) and or DFM/DFA
• PPAP or FAI: Risk tools in use – DFMEA, PFMEA, Control Plan, SPC (PP, PPk), MSA (Gage Capability)
Risk Tools Used for Product Launch Risk
25 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How about Lean and Six Sigma during New Product Development Launch?
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Risk in Product Safety & Managing Requirements
26 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hazard and Risk Analysis ASILsSafety
Requirements
BOM Elements
Safety
Req.
Functional Safety ConceptFunctional
Safety ConceptTechnical Safety
Concept
Design
These standards (ISO 26262) Focus on Electronics and Electrical and extend to software and hardware
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Ongoing Quality and Delivery RisksPPAPs –
Detection – Dimensional Results, Performance Tests, Material Certs
Prevention – FMEA/Control Plan, MSA, Capability Studies
Manage the Change –Product and Process Change – Supply Chain Based
Capacity Analysis and Run at Rate& MMOG for Shipping/Logistics + Contingency Planning + Ongoing Monitoring (ERP)
and Scorecards
27 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Customers worked together to focus on SE Asia Semiconductor Supply Base.
• Conducted industry-based second party certification based on customer audits, conducted training, and used a common dash board. Companies had a customer sponsor that coached them in becoming certified to the most stringent Best-In-Class supplier standards.
• Focused on Quality System, Lead Times, FMEA, APQP/PPAP, SPC, and disciplined Problem Solving.
• Focused efforts made US and European Semiconductor industry competitive again –see improvements on next slide.
Case Study of The Semiconductor Industry
28 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
RESULTS
• Productivity improvements 10% – 30%– Equipment and People
• Yield improvement– Subcontractor yields improved to 99.6%
• Performance to schedule improvement– Consistently sustaining 100%
• Number of customer complaints decreased– Up to 15x reduction
– Ron Ramos, Philips Semiconductor, SAC Board
Case Study – Semiconductor Industry
29 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
VOLVO Trucks – Asia
• Supported Product Launch of Quester Truck assisting suppliers in 5 countries: India, Thailand, China, Malaysia and Singapore
• Assignment involved a host of supply chain programs starting with Supplier integration audits of over 150 VOLVO suppliers from all over Asia
– Omnex audited the suppliers on critical metrics that included Volvo-specific requirements
– Helped suppliers arrive at a prioritized action plan that were mission critical to SOP
– The assessments and improvements covered Quality, Lean, Safety, Environmental
• Included APQP, PPAP, Process qualification, design , plant layouts and ergonomics
– Trained and implemented these actions for suppliers
– Ensured the program was in sync with the overall product launch date and Start of Production
– Hand over sites to Volvo SQE/ SQA teams
Duration: 1.5 years
Case Study
30 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Vertically integrated with customers responsible for Design to Tiered Structure with Tier Ones responsible for Design
• Tier Two - generally smaller family owned businesses typically supplying multiple markets changing to larger multi plant suppliers
• Tier Three – small suppliers supplying a component to Tier Ones or Tier Twos generally supplying multiple markets
• Tier Four – larger raw material suppliers
Supply Chain Changes 1980s to 2015
31 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Changes in the region of the suppliers from mostly US to now Global, this globalization will continue Large European and Japanese Tier Ones are evident today, soon this will turn to large Indian and
Chinese Tier Ones as well Tier Twos will become larger entities supplying large Tier Ones. Forces driving this change are the
same forces that drove Tier Ones into becoming larger, ie. industry expectations, technology, and capital needs
Tier Threes will be affected as well. The same forces of changes will be felt by Tier Threes.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Electronics and software content in vehicles along with Autonomous cars, braking and Electric cars will bring many new suppliers into the Automotive Industry– The risk for quality and delivery will suddenly jump
– This is evident from looking at the JD Power scores for Tesla
• Suppliers from Silicon Valley that do not believe in ISO standards and any of the Automotive Industry standards for eg problem solving can be a problem– Eg. of large software supplier
• Hardware suppliers from China and software suppliers from India will increase risk in many ways including Security and Code of Conduct
• The weakened balance of power of large OEMs will be still weakened when partnering with large software or electronics companies eg. Microsoft or Nvidia
Supply Chain Changes 2015 to 2050
32 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Discussion on Balance of Power and Implications on Supply Chain Initiatives
33 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
OEM
Tier One
Tier Three
Tier Two
OEM
Tier One
Tier Three
Tier Two
OEM
Tier One
Tier Three
Tier Two
Automotive Aerospace Semiconductor
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Discussion: Top 12 Disruptive Technologies and their Impact on Supply Chain Risk
34 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Speed, scope, and economic value at stake of 12 potentially economically disruptive technologies
Source : McKinsey Global Institute Report
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Track APQP & UPPAP Projects
APQP Projects
PPAP Projects
Software the has the capability to track APQP and PPAP
WWW.OMNEX.COM
APQP Task DocumentsRouted and accepted deliverables are saved in a folder structure in a document manager (link with suite)
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Linked DFMEAs, PFMEAs, Control Plans and Standardized Work using Enterprise Software
37
Dynamic Linkage of Documents Connects DESIGN to Shop floor DocumentsLinkages of Print
requirementsTo Shop Floor
Link between ProcessEngineering to Shop Floor
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
DVP&R(Test Plan)
DVP&R(Test Plan)
DVP&R(Test Plan)
System/DesignFMEA
RequirementManager
Sub-systemDFMEA
DFMEA
Control PlanPFMEAProcess FlowPPAP/FAI
As per Bill ofMaterials
(BOM)
Cause and EffectRelationship
Links SFMEA/DFMEALinkages to
Cause and EffectRelationship
System
Component
Cause and EffectRelationship
All requirements in FMEA?All requirements tested?All requirements in PPAP/FAI?
Indicated via color coding
DASHBOARD
(Requirements decompose to characteristics)
Linked DFMEAs, PFMEAs, Control Plans and Standardized Work
38
Link VOC to System Requirements to Components and Supply Chain
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Component
Sub-System
Functions/Requirements Characteristics
Critical
Important
Critical
Important
ASILs ASILs
KPC/KCC
Traceability between Functions, Testing, and Characteristics
System
Critical Functions
Requirements Management – Internally and Flow Down to Suppliers
39 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Historical
Design
Critical
Important
ASILs
Process
Critical
Important
ASILs
KPC/KCC
Planning
DesignFailures
ProcessFailures
Product FamilyWarranty,
Field Failure, Plant Failure.
Lessons Learned
40 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
734.761.4940
Questions?
Thank You!
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.41
Appendix
42
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
LEAN SIX SIGMA – LOGISTICSCase Study
43
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Project Definition
44 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Project Name: Logistics
Problem Definition: The transit time for units to analysis /
repair can average more than 3 days.
(from the dock to the availability of the
part to the Workshop; including ERP
registration)
The transit time for units from analysis
/ repair to the dock has a median of 6
working days
Units are being refurbished as they
arrive; not based on expected need
Project Scope: Improve and ensure efficient and
effective processing of OEM /
Aftermarket units
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Project Definition
45 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Project Name: Logistics
Problem Objectives: 1) To eliminate or minimize any non-
value added shipment of products,
before or after refurbishment.
2) To eliminate or minimize any non-
valued added handling of products,
before or after refurbishment.
3) Refurbish only those returned parts
which will be used; i.e. eliminate
refurbishment of parts which will
languish in storage.
Don’t repair what isn’t neededSend parts to where they are needed
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Project Metrics
46 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Lead Time between delivery and workshop
Receiving: Current = 46% same day; 27% next day; 27% 2 or more days through first segment
Current = 43% same day; 26% next day; 31% 2 or more days through second segment
Goal = 80% same day; 20% next day;
Lead Time between end repair and stock
Receiving : Current = 17% same day; 7% next day; 76% 2 or more daysCurrent = 4% same day; 4% next day; 92%
2 or more days through second segmentGoal = 80% same day; 20% next day;
Average overall handling time per unitCurrent: 20 min/unitGoal: 10 min/unit
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Phase I
• Outsourcing of Re-Labeled devices
• Provide a disciplined approach for all aftermarket returns
• Eliminate redundancy within OEM return process
Phase II
• Utilize a pull system for refurbishment to storage
• Utilize a pull system/supermarket for replacement / spare parts (raw goods) with inventory to be managed by an external agency
Approach
47 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Current State Map
48 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
DC AudiPorsche
HB
Test Warranty
rmcTech
Rest Warranty
Avg 18% of DC total
Stores units to be repair;
14 days lead time
Nuss
Stores units to be repair (1100)
and repaired (1800);
1-3 days lead time
zcs1 entered when received
EESAvg 43% Vol
HB
Nuss
Customer
Receipt of
Goods
Sorting and
Scanning
Delivery Note
CT Avg 3 min 1 day 5 min
zcs2Move to
storage
racks
1 day
Workshop
? min
6.4 days
Packaging
? min ? days
Shipping
? min
Test Warranty
Receipt of
Goods
Sorting of
Goods
CT Avg 3 min 1 day 2 min
zcs1
5 min
zcs2
1 day
Move to
storage
racks
1 min 1 day
Workshop
? min
Test Warranty
Future State -- OEM
1 day 2.5 min 1 day 3 min
Nuss
Shipping requests per
EOQ (Kan Ban)
scheduling
0.5 min electronic
Customer
April 25, 2007
Future State Map
49 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Implementation of these recommendations will:
• Reduce the logistical content at the client’s facility from an average of 14.6 to 5.2 man months per month
– Reduce time handling the units by an average of 6.5 min
– Reduce the non-Test Goods Receipt volume to an average of 2885 per month (reduction of 65%)
• This assume the current levels of OEM and Aftermarket returns
• Note: Test receipts averaged 366 per month for cy 2006
– Eliminate the handling of OEM parts which will be refurbished outside the client’s facility.
• Currently an average of 43% of OEM receipts
Results
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.50
This provides an estimate yearly savings (gross) of $1,020,000 or 9.4 FTEs
WWW.OMNEX.COM
LEAN SIX SIGMA IN SUPPLY CHAIN
51
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Lean and Six Sigma in the Enterprise
52 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Our Site
Sub System
Part A
Raw MatCustomer
Raw Mat
Enterprise
Supply Chain management
encompasses planning and
management of all activities
involved in sourcing, procurement,
conversion, and logistics. CSMP
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Lean in the Enterprise
53 Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Sub System
Part A
Raw MatCustomer
Raw Mat
Enterprise
Lean within the Four Walls of a Organization
Versus
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Lean in the Enterprise
This is the opportunity for Supply Chain Professionals. While many companies have practiced lean within the four walls. Lean in the Supply Chain or Enterprise is an opportunity waiting to happen.
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.54
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Supply Chain Six Sigma Projects
• Nonconforming product from suppliers
• Wrong Shipment from suppliers
• Recall of products from supplier (300 recalls from suppliers a month in a major hospital)
• Billing errors from suppliers
• Financial Transaction Errors
• Data Entry Errors
• Packaging problems from suppliers
• Reduce Inspection
• Reduce Rework
• Defect reduction during product ramp up
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.55
WWW.OMNEX.COM
LEAN AND SIX SIGMA AND HOW IT WORKS
56
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Option I: Six Sigma – Green Belt Projects
• Option II: Six Sigma – Black Belt Projects
• Option III: Lean – Lean Transformation of a Site
• Option IV: Lean and Six Sigma – Green Belt Projects that have COPF and COPQ mixed together for improvement
• Option V: Lean and Six Sigma – Black Belt Projects that have COPF and COPQ mixed together for improvement
Options for Implementation
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.57
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Difference Between Green Belt and Black Belt Projects
Difference Green Belt Black Belt
Savings of Project $50,000 to $90,000 Greater than $150,000
Implementation Effort Lesser Effort Greater Effort
Duration 2 to 3 months 4 to 6 months
Workshop Days 7 days 20 days
Cost to Company ½ of Black Belt
Savings $1 to 2 Million (up to 15 projects)
$1.5 Million to $4 Million (up to 15 projects)
Project Local Cross-functional
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.58
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Examples of Lean Projects
• Lean Logistics – reduce time to repair and reduce time to analyze the problem, and inventory of repair and finished goods
• Reduce on-hold lots
• Increase capacity
• Cycle time reduction
• Diagnostic Test Cycle Time Reduction
• Lead time to reply/respond to customer problems
• Uptime Improvement of key technologies
• Flow of material/service in a Process –high receiving and high in-process before final operation or step; ability to transform to a continuous flow
• Excessive labor costs
• Reduce tool repair time
• Lead time to reply to customer sales opportunity
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.59
WWW.OMNEX.COM
Six Sigma Projects
• Scrap due to contamination on machine
• Scrap rate from XYZ machine during setup
• Any 100% inspected Dimension
• Yield Improvement
• Diagnostic Test Errors
• Reduce Customer Reject
• Reduce Test Failures
• Financial Transaction Errors
• Data Entry Errors
• Wrong Medication
• Wrong Treatment
• Reduce Scrap Rate
• Reduce Inspection
• Reduce Rework
• Defect reduction during product ramp up
• Reduce Sentinel Events
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.60
WWW.OMNEX.COM
• Six Sigma focuses on variation reduction and Lean on time (reducing lead times). Put them together and you have a powerful improvement process that can work on improving quality and also on reducing waste
• Lean uses Value Stream Mapping and an assortment of tools ranging from set up reduction to work cell layouts for improvement
– Opportunity for Supply Chain professionals is Extended Value Streams or Value Streaming the enterprise
• Six Sigma uses DMAIC or the methodology of Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control
– Black Belts and Green Belts work on projects
• There is much opportunity for savings in the Supply Chain by using extended value streams to reduce lead time and inventory or six sigma for variation reduction
Summary
Copyright 2016 Omnex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.61