right v

28
Denisa Muraru, MD* # *Department of Cardiac,Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, University of Padua, Padua (Italy) # Echocardiography Laboratory, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest (Romania) EUROECHO CONGRESS - COPENHAGEN - 2010

description

right ventricle

Transcript of right v

Page 1: right v

Denisa Muraru, MD*#

*Department of Cardiac,Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, University of Padua, Padua (Italy)

#Echocardiography Laboratory, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest (Romania)

EUROECHO CONGRESS - COPENHAGEN - 2010

Page 2: right v

RIGHT VENTRICLE

Important prognostic value:

• after acute myocardial infarction

• heart failure

• valvular heart disease

• congenital heart disease (Fallot)

• pulmonary hypertension

• after cardiac transplantation

Hochreiter C. Circulation 1986

Pfisterer M et al. Eur Heart J 1986

Bhatia SJS et al. Circulation 1994

Di Salvo TG et al. JACC 1995

Van Straten A et al. Eur Radiol 2005

Nath J et al. Echocardiography 2005

Not anymore an innocent bystander of the left

Page 3: right v

RIGHT VENTRICLE ASSESSMENT IN CLINICAL

SETTINGS

Shift from qualitative to quantitative RV study

Is there a place for echocardiography?

Page 4: right v

1D

• M-mode (RV diameters, RV wall thickness,TAPSE, septal motion pattern)

2D

• RV diameters, areas and wall thickness (1D measures)

• Fractional area change (FAC)

• RV ejection fraction (RVEF)

Doppler

• Spectral (RV dp/dt, Tei index, diastolic fx, RV systolic pressure)

• TDI (Tei index, S velocity, diastolic fx, strain/strain-rate)

STE• Strain/strain-rate

3D

• RV volumes

• RVEF

• RV shape and mass

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Page 5: right v

Assessment based on qualitative and quantitative parameters

RV systolic function - at least one of the following:

• fractional area change (FAC)

• S wave (TDI)

• tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)

•± RV index of myocardial performance (Tei index)

! 2D RVEF is not recommended, because of the heterogeneity

of methods and the numerous geometric assumptions.

Rudsky LG et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010

Page 6: right v

Challenges for 2D echocardiography

• thin-walled chamber behind the sternum

• separate inflow and outflow portions

• asymmetrical, crescentic shape, wrapped around LV

• variations of shape with loading conditions

• heavily trabeculated

(several views needed)

(non-simultaneously imaged)

(difficult to describe

by any simple

geometric model)

(poor reproducibility of endocardial tracing)

RIGHT VENTRICLE

Page 7: right v

2D• RV fractional area change (RVFAC)

• Poor reproducibility

• RV apical foreshortening in 4Ch

• Depends on high image quality and

operator experience to accurately

include endocardial trabeculations

• End-systolic view not the same as

end-diastolic one depending on

extent of heart twisting

End-diastolic Area

End-systolic Area

GLOBAL RV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

RV FAC < 35% = RV systolic dysfx

Limitations:

Page 8: right v

Doppler• RV Tei index = (IVCT+IVRT)/Ejection time

• Load dependency - pseudonormalizes

when right atrial pressure is high (e.g.

RV infarction) due to shortened IVRT

• Needs similar RR intervals

Tei C et al. JACC 1996

Yoshifuku S et al. Am J Cardiol 2003

Tei index = (a-b)/b

Tricuspid flow

RVOT flow

GLOBAL RV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Limitations:

Tei index >0.40 = RV systolic dysfx

Page 9: right v

• measured with external reference point

and thus influenced by overall heart

displacement from base to apex

• highly influenced by angle of interrogation

and load (i.e. TR)

• TAPSE possibly depends not only on RV

systolic function, but also on LV systolic

function due to ventricular interdependence

Jiang L et al. Echocardiography 1997

Kaul S. Am Heart J 1984

Lopez-Candales A et al. Am J Cardiol 2006

Tamborini G et al. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009

1D• M-mode: TAPSE

TAPSE <16 mm = RV systolic dysfx

REGIONAL INDICES OF RV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Limitations:

Page 10: right v

Doppler• Tissue Doppler imaging: peak S wave

Limitations:

• One-dimensional and regional

• Tricuspid valve disease

• Non-sinus rhythm (not validated)

• Technical pitfalls (alignment,

tethering, spectral broadening)

S

E’A’

CIV

Peak S <10 mm = RV systolic dysfx

REGIONAL INDICES OF RV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Page 11: right v

Courtesy of Dr S. Giusca

TAPSE

LV apex

displacement

Midwall RV strain

Basal RV strain

DEFORMATION IMAGING DESCRIBES RV

FUNCTION BETTER THAN TAPSE

Page 12: right v

STE• RV deformation (longitudinal 2D strain)

• Angle-independent method based

on routine 2D images

• Sensitive and rapid measure of

global and segmental longitudinal RV

function

• Discriminates true myocardial

deformation from displacement and

tethering

• Less load dependent than velocities

and EF

• Provides both regional amplitude

and timing (RV dyssynchrony)

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Page 13: right v

TAPSE 18 mmTAPSE 24 mm TAPSE 18 mm

Control Tricuspid Reg. PAH

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Volume vs pressure RV overload

Page 14: right v

Pressure overloadNormal Volume overload

84 ms

STE• RV deformation (longitudinal 2D strain)

Control Tricuspid Reg. PAH

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Global L Strain = -22% Global L Strain = -22.7% Global L Strain = -13.8%

Page 15: right v

GS -19% Severe PH in Eisenmenger sd

GS -24% Severe pulmonary valve stenosis GS -11% Severe PAH

Grad VD-AD 21 mmHg

GS -10% Severe PH in post-myocarditis DCM

RV-RA gradient 65 mmHg RV-RA gradient 75 mmHg

RV-RA gradient 75 mmHg RV-RA gradient 99 mmHg

HIGHLY VARIABLE RV ADAPTATION TO

SEVERE PRESSURE OVERLOAD

Page 16: right v

Severe secondary PH in DCM

Severe PAH GS -11%

GS -10%

REGIONAL DEFORMATION DIFFERENCES

Page 17: right v

CLINICAL CASE

Operated Fallot tetralogy:

• Hypertrophied dilated RV with distorted geometry

• Abnormal septal motion

• Recent surgery

• Tricuspid annuloplasty

• Signs of increased RA pressures

• Atrial fibrillation

RV foreshortening

ES and ED difficult to identify for FAC calculation

TAPSE not reliable

TAPSE, TDI S wave not reliable

Tei index may “pseudonormalize’’

TDI S wave not validated, Tei index and RV strain not

applicable

Page 18: right v

Doppler• Tissue Doppler derived RV Tei index

• Simpler and more rapid, based on single

cycle measurements

• Independent of heart rate

• Feasible in pts with irregular R-R

• Smaller evidence

• Different reference values

(TDI Tei index >0.55 = RV dysfunction)

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

a

b

b

Page 19: right v

3D Echocardiography

VOLUMETRIC RV FUNCTION ASSESSMENT

Clinical case:

- EDV = 119 ml

- ESV = 96 ml

- RVEF = 20%

Page 20: right v

• Full-volume 3D echocardiography: Pros3D

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

• Actual 3D acquisition and measurements

• Unlimited repeatability

• No geometric assumptions about RV shape

• Rapid spatial appreciation from multiple

perspectives

• Extensively validated against CMR

• Provides RV volumes, stroke volume and

ejection fraction

• Reference values are now available

Niemann PS et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007

Shimada YJ et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010

Tamborini G et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010

Page 21: right v

Unprecedented in vivo anatomy in beating heart

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Courtesy of Dr. Cristina Basso, Cardiovascular Pathology, University of Padua, Italy

PV

TV

MBRA

1

2

3

Ao

IVSm

TV

RA

Ao PV

MB

IVSm

Page 22: right v

EDV= 77 ml ESV= 28 ml RVEF= 64%

EDV =140 ml ESV= 68 ml RVEF= 52%

EDV= 113 ml ESV= 78 ml RVEF= 31%

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Control Tricuspid Reg. PAH

Volume vs pressure RV overload

Page 23: right v

RV FUNCTION AFTER SURGERY

TAPSE3D RVEF TDI S wave

• After surgery, TAPSE and TDI S amplitude decreased, despite no

sign or symptom of RV failure was present before or after surgery

• Conversely, 3D EF remained unchanged

• RV longitudinal function as assessed by TAPSE/TDI may not reflect

true RV global performance after uncomplicated cardiac surgery

(presumably due to geometrical changes of RV chamber)

Tamborini G et al. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009

Page 24: right v

ECHO ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICLE

Limitations of current 3D echocardiography

• Systematic bias versus CMR (especially in large RVs and in elderly)

• Endocardial blurring affecting semi-automated tracking algorithm

• Limited temporal resolution

• RV anterior wall and RVOT inadequately imaged (especially in

enlarged RVs)

• To date, only qualitative assessment of regional function possible

• Patient cooperation needed

• Dedicated training for both acquisition and offline analysis

• (Arrhythmias)

• (Cost)

Shimada YJ et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010

Page 25: right v

RV DIASTOLIC FUNCTION

Much more than RV wall thickness

• marker of early or subtle RV dysfunction

• marker of poor prognosis in patients with known RV impairment

E

AS

E’A’

rIVRT

EDT

Rudsky LG et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010

Assessing and grading RV diastolic function should be considered

in patients with suspected RV impairment as:

Page 26: right v

E’A’

TAPSE 23 mm

Ԑ

SRs

SRe

SRa

Global RV strain -23%

Global RV strain rate

AE

EARLY DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION IN PAH

=12 cm/sS

Page 27: right v

• Current echo techniques allow a tailored quantitative approach

for the assessment of RV size and function

• 3DE has no rival for measuring the complex-shaped RV and is

the only volumetric echo method to assess global RV function

• A multi-parameter approach and the advanced technologies

(STE, 3DE) can compensate for the flaws of single conventional

indices of RV function

• RV diastolic function could provide novel insights in RV function

impairment early in disease course

• Further outcome studies are needed to certify the clinical value

of novel echo methods over the conventional RV indices

CONCLUSIONS

Page 28: right v

I hear and I forget,

I see and I remember,

I do and I understand!

Confucius