Right to the City/Right to Landscape

92
The Right to the City/The Right to Landscape: From an Elitist to a More Just Urban Landscape in California’s East Bay Don Mitchell Department of Geography Syracuse University

Transcript of Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Page 1: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

The Right to the City/The Right to Landscape:From an Elitist to a More Just Urban Landscape in

California’s East Bay

Don MitchellDepartment of Geography

Syracuse University

Page 2: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

MoragaOaklandSan Francisco

Me, landscaping Moraga, 1965

Page 3: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Such places “evoke a never-never land of Spanish California arcadia, a dreamy suggestion of whitewashed missions set against rolling hills, their red-tiled roofs glowing carmine in the sunset” (Kevin Starr, 1985, 191).

Page 4: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 5: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Political Ecology: “the development of regional or spatial accounts of degradation that link, through ‘chains of explanation’, local decision-makers to spatial variations in environmental structure” (Dictionary of Human Geography, 3rd ed., p. 546)

Page 6: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Political Ecology: “the development of regional or spatial accounts of degradation that link, through ‘chains of explanation’, local decision-makers to spatial variations in environmental structure” (Dictionary of Human Geography, 3rd ed., p. 546)

Page 7: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Political Ecology: “the development of regional or spatial accounts of degradation that link, through ‘chains of explanation’, local decision-makers to spatial variations in environmental structure” (Dictionary of Human Geography, 3rd ed., p. 546)

Page 8: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 9: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 10: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 11: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Such places “evoke a never-never land of Spanish California arcadia, a dreamy suggestion of whitewashed missions set against rolling hills, their red-tiled roofs glowing carmine in the sunset” (Kevin Starr, 1985, 191).

Page 12: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

The Hacienda is representative of the Californios, the “Spanish Dons of whom one reads so much in the … numerous historical romances of the period” (Carey McWilliams, 1946, 51).

Page 13: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 14: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 15: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 16: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 17: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 18: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 19: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 20: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 21: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 22: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 23: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 24: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 25: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 26: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Russell Bruzzone

Page 27: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 28: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 29: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 30: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 31: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 32: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 33: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 34: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 35: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 36: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 37: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 38: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 39: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 40: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 41: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 42: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 43: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 44: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 45: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 46: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 47: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

More condominiums “might work for Berkeley, but would be a disaster for Moraga” (2008 campaign against open space law extension)

Page 48: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

More condominiums “might work for Berkeley, but would be a disaster for Moraga” (2008 campaign against open space law extension)

Lower income housing would “drastically change Moraga’s unique family-oriented character forever” (2008 campaign against open space law extension)

Page 49: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 50: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Moraga

2010Population = 16016

1.7% Black0.2% Native American0.2% Pacific Islander1.8% “Some other race”5.0% Two or more races14.9% Asian76.2% White(7% Hispanic)

2006-2009/1095.9% in Management, service … jobs$147,000 Median family Income$995,000 Median house value

200081.1% White

93.7% in Management, service … jobs$116,000 Median family income$538,500 Median house value

199089% White

USA

13% Black

5% Asian72% White

$51,914 Median household income$188,500 Median house value

75% White, 12.3% Black, 3.6% Asian

Page 51: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Moraga

2010Population = 16015

1.7% Black0.2% Native American0.2% Pacific Islander1.8% “Some other race”5.0% Two or more races14.9% Asian76.2% White(7% Hispanic)

2006-2009/1095.9% in Management, service … jobs$147,000 Median family Income$995,000 Median house value

200081.1% White

93.7% in Management, service … jobs$116,000 Median family income$538,500 Median house value2.9% Below poverty line199089% White

Oakland

28% Black

16.8% Asian34.5% White(25.4% Hispanic)

2008-20012

$51,683 Median household income$449,800 Median house value20.3% Below poverty line

31.3% White, 35.7% Black, 15.2% Asian (21.9% Hispanic)$40,055 Median household income$235,500 Median house value19.4% Below poverty line

Page 52: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

MoragaOaklandSan Francisco

Page 53: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

“The federal government dramatically democratized the housing market while simultaneously enforcing racial segregation that resembled apartheid.”

The federal government itself “created the machinery through which housing discrimination operates.”

(Robert Self, American Babylon, 2003, 97)

Page 54: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

In 1964San Leandro voted 80% in favor of Proposition 14

Page 55: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

In 1964San Leandro voted 80% in favor of Proposition 14

Proposition 14 was “the first evidence of an emerging white political backlash against the civil rights movement in California” (Self 2003, 167)

Page 56: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

In 1964San Leandro voted 80% in favor of Proposition 14Other bayside suburbs voted in favor with percentages ranging from 67-73%

Proposition 14 was “the first evidence of an emerging white political backlash against the civil rights movement in California” (Self 2003, 167)

Page 57: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

In 1964San Leandro voted 80% in favor of Proposition 14Other bayside suburbs voted in favor with percentages ranging from 67-73%

East Oakland voted 92% “No”

Proposition 14 was “the first evidence of an emerging white political backlash against the civil rights movement in California” (Self 2003, 167)

Page 58: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Moraga, 1964

Page 59: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Moraga, 1964

Page 60: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

“After decades of lobbying both state and federal governments against fair housing, and decades of promoting segregation in local communities, representatives of the real estate industry then claimed they were merely looking out for the ‘rights’ of their constituents and were innocent of any complicity in discrimination. The purposeful deception underscored the lengths to which industry representatives would go to preserve their control over one of the most lucrative real estate markets in the country” (Self 2003, 265)

Page 61: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 62: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 63: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

MoragaOaklandSan Francisco

Page 64: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

MoragaOaklandSan Francisco

Richmond

Page 65: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 66: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 67: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 68: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

How have some – whites – “distanced themselves from both industrial pollution and nonwhites?” (Laura Pulido, 2000, 14).

Page 69: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Such places “evoke a never-never land of Spanish California arcadia, a dreamy suggestion of whitewashed missions set against rolling hills, their red-tiled roofs glowing carmine in the sunset” (Kevin Starr, 1985, 191).

Page 70: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Such never-never lands only exist because they are part of a history of conquest and globalization

Page 71: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Such degraded landscapes only exist because they are part of a history of conquest and globalization

Page 72: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

“All political ecologists set themselves two primary goals: to account for the production of nature and environment, and to understand the ways in which (produced) natures and environments help shape social relations”

(Geoff Mann, 2009, 336, citing Robbins 2004)

Page 73: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

“All political ecologists set themselves two primary goals: to account for the production of nature and environment, and to understand the ways in which (produced) natures and environments help shape social relations”

(Geoff Mann, 2009, 336, citing Robbins 2004)

Page 74: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

“All political ecologists set themselves two primary goals: to account for the production of nature and environment, and to understand the ways in which (produced) natures and environments help shape social relations”

(Geoff Mann, 2009, 336, citing Robbins 2004)

Page 75: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 76: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Oakland

Moraga

Page 77: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

Political ecology is motivated “primarily (but not exclusively) [by a] social justice project” (Mann 2009, 337)

Page 78: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 79: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 80: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 81: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 82: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

A landscape is “an area, as perceived by people whose character is the result of action and interaction of natural and/or human factors” (European Landscape Convention)

Page 83: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

A landscape is “an area, as perceived by people whose character is the result of action and interaction of natural and/or human factors” (European Landscape Convention)

States are obliged “to recognize landscapes in law as an essential component of people’s surroundings” and identities; “establish and implement policies aimed at landscape protection, management and planning; create procedures for public participation in management and preservation; and “integrate landscape into … regional and town planning policies” as well as policies covering other practices that might affect the landscape” (Déjeant-Pons 2006, 370).

Page 84: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

A landscape is “an area, as perceived by people whose character is the result of action and interaction of natural and/or human factors” (European Landscape Convention)

States are obliged “to recognize landscapes in law as an essential component of people’s surroundings” and identities; “establish and implement policies aimed at landscape protection, management and planning; create procedures for public participation in management and preservation; and “integrate landscape into … regional and town planning policies” as well as policies covering other practices that might affect the landscape” (Déjeant-Pons 2006, 370).

Page 85: Right to the City/Right to Landscape

A landscape is “an area, as perceived by people whose character is the result of action and interaction of natural and/or human factors” (European Landscape Convention)

States are obliged “to recognize landscapes in law as an essential component of people’s surroundings” and identities; “establish and implement policies aimed at landscape protection, management and planning; create procedures for public participation in management and preservation; and “integrate landscape into … regional and town planning policies” as well as policies covering other practices that might affect the landscape” (Déjeant-Pons 2006, 370).

Page 86: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 87: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 88: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 89: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 90: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 91: Right to the City/Right to Landscape
Page 92: Right to the City/Right to Landscape