Riferimenti bibliografici · RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI 527 Nations and Cultures, in S.S. Nagel (a...

Riferimenti bibliografici

Riferimenti bibliografici

AARON, H.J. [1978], Politics and theProfessors: The Great Society inPerspective, Washington, D.C.,The Brookings Institution.

ABERBACH, J.D., PUTNAM, R.D. eROCKMAN, B.A. [1981], Bureau-crats and Politicians in WesternDemocracies, Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.

ACKERMAN, B.A. [1984], Reconstruc-ting American Law, Cambridge,Mass., Harvard University Press.

ADLER, S.E. e LAPINSKI, J.S. [1997],Demand-Side Theory and Con-gressional Committee Composi-tion: A Constituency Characteri-stics Approach, in «AmericanJournal of Political Science», vol.41, n. 3, pp. 895-918.

AGRANOFF, R. e MCGUIRE, M.[1998], Multinetwork Manage-ment: Collaboration and the Hol-low State in Local Economic Poli-cy, in «Journal of Public Admi-nistration Research and Theory»,vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 67-91.

AGRE, P.E. e CHAPMAN, D. [1994],A che servono i piani?, in «Siste-mi Intelligenti», vol. 6, n. 2, pp.287-317.

AINIS, M. [1997], La legge oscura:

come e perché non funziona,Roma-Bari, Laterza.

AKERLOF, G. [1970], The Market for«Lemons»: Quality Uncertaintyand the Market Mechanism, in«The Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics», vol. 84, n. 3, pp. 488-500.

ALBER, J. [1982], Vom Armenhauszum Wohlfahrtsstaat, Frankfurt,Campus; trad. it. Dalla carità alloStato sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino,1987.

ALDRICH, J.H. [1993], Rational Choiceand Turnout, in «American Jour-nal of Political Science», vol. 37,n. 1, pp. 246-278.

ALLISON, G.T. [1971], Essence ofDecision. Explaining the CubanMissile Crisis, Boston, Mass., Lit-tle, Brown.

— [1980], Implementation Analysis:The «Missing Chapter» in Con-ventional Analysis Illustrated bya Teaching Exercise, in L. Lewine E. Vedung (a cura di), Politicsas Rational Action, Dordrecht,Reidel, pp. 237-260.

ALLUM, P. [1973], Italy, Republicwithout Government?, London,Weidenfeld & Nicholson; trad.

526 RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI

it. Anatomia di una repubblica.Potere ed istituzioni in Italia,Milano, Feltrinelli, 1976.

ALMOND, G. e VERBA, S. [1963],The Civic Culture , Princeton,N.J., Princeton University Press.

ALT, J.E. e ALESINA, A. [1996], Poli-tical Economy: An Overview, inR.E. Goodin e H.-D. Klinge-mann (a cura di), A New Hand-book of Political Science, Oxford,Oxford University Press, pp.645-674.

ALT, J.E. e SHEPSLE, K.A. [1998],Rules, Restrictions, Constraints:Structure and Process in the NewInstitutiona l Economics, in«Journal of Institutional andTheoretica l Economics», vol.154, n. 4, pp. 735-743.

AMACHER, R.C., TOLLISON, R.D. eWILLETT, T.D. [1976], The Eco-nomic Approach to Social PolicyQuestions: Some MethodologicalPerspectives , in R.C. Amacher,R.D. Tollison e T.D. Willett (acura di), The Economic Approachto Public Policy, Ithaca, N.Y., Cor-nell University Press, pp. 18-37.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSO-CIATION’S COMMITTEE ON POLI-TICAL PARTIES [1950], Toward aMore Responsible Two-Party Sy-stem, New York, Rinehart.

ANDERSON, C.W. [1978], The Logicof Public Problems: Evaluation inComparative Policy Research, inAshford [1978, 19-41].

— [1987] , Political Philosophy,Practica l Reason, and PolicyAnalysis, in F. Fischer e J. Fore-ster (a cura di), Confronting Va-lues in Policy Analysis. The Poli-tics of Criteria, Newbury Park,Calif., Sage, pp. 22-44.

APPLEBY, P.H. [1949], Policy andAdministration, University, Ala.,University of Alabama Press.

ARGYRIS, C. [1982], Reasoning, Lear-

ning and Action, San Francisco,Calif., Jossey-Bass.

ARGYRIS, C. e SCHÖN, D.A. [1978],Organizational Learning: A The-ory of Action Perspective, Rea-ding, Mass., Addison-Wesley.

ARROW, K.J. [1951], Social Choiceand Individual Values, NewYork, Wiley; trad. it. Scelte socia-li e preferenze individuali, Mila-no, Etas Kompass, 1977.

— [1963], Uncertainty and the Wel-fare Economics of Medical Care,in «American Economic Re-view», vol. 53, n. 5, pp. 941-973;trad. it. Incertezza e l’economiadel benessere dell’assistenza medi-ca, in Equilibrio, incertezza, sceltasociale, Bologna, Il Mulino,1987, pp. 171-216.

— [1967] , Values and CollectiveDecision-Making, in P. Laslett eW.G. Runciman (a cura di), Phi-losophy, Politics and Society ,New York, Barnes and Noble,pp. 215-232; trad. it. Valori eprocesso di decisione collettiva, inEquilibrio, incertezza, scelta socia-le, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1987, pp.231-254.

ARTHUR, B.W. [1989], CompetingTechnologies, Increasing Returns,and Lock-In by Historical Events,in «Economic Journal», vol. 99,n. 394, pp. 116-131.

ASHBY, R.W. [1956], An Introduc-tion to Cybernetics, New York,Wiley; trad. it. Introduzione allacibernetica, Torino, Einaudi,1971.

ASHFORD, D.E. (a cura di) [1978],Comparing Public Policies: NewConcepts and Methods, London-Beverly Hills, Sage, pp. 19-41.

— [1982], British Dogmatism andFrench Pragmatism: Central-LocalPolicymaking in the Welfare Sta-te, London, Allen & Unwin.

— [1983], Comparing Policies across

RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI 527

Nations and Cultures , in S.S.Nagel (a cura di), Encyclopediaof Policy Studies, New York,Marcel Dekker, pp. 171-200.

ATKINSON, M.M. e COLEMAN, W.D.[1992], Policy Networks, PolicyCommunities and the Problemsof Governance, in «Governan-ce», vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 154-180.

AUMANN, R.J. [1988], Lectures onGame Theory, Boulder, Colo.,Westview Press.

AUSTEN-SMITH, D. e WRIGHT, J.R.[1994], Counteractive Lobbying,in «American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 38, n. 1, pp. 25-44.

AXELROD, R.M. [1977], The MedicalMetaphor, in «American Journalof Political Science», vol. 21, n.2, pp. 430-432.

— [1984], The Evolution of Coope-ration, New York, Basic Books;trad. it. Giochi di reciprocità.L’insorgenza della cooperazione,Milano, Feltrinelli, 1985.

BACHRACH, P. [1967], The Theory ofDemocratic Elitism , Boston,Mass., Little, Brown.

BACHRAC H, P. e BARAT Z, M.S.[1962], Two Faces of Power, in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 56, n. 4, pp. 947-952;trad. it. Le due facce del potere,in G. Sartori (a cura di), Antolo-gia di scienza politica, Bologna, IlMulino, 1970, pp. 187-195.

— [1963], Decisions and Nondeci-sion: An Analytical Framework,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 57, n. 3, pp. 632-642.

BACKOFF, R.W. e MITNICK, B.M.[1986], Reappraising the Promiseof General Systems Theory forthe Policy Sciences, in W.N.Dunn (a cura di), Policy Analy-sis: Perspectives, Concepts and

Methods, Greenwich, Conn., JAI

Press, pp. 23-40.BALDWIN, R. e HAWKINS, K. [1984],

Discretionary Justice: Davis Re-considered, in «Public Law», in-verno, pp. 570-599.

BALL, T. [1995], An Ambivalent Al-liance: Political Science and Ame-rican Democracy, in J. Farr, J.S.Dryzek e S.T. Leonard (a curadi), Political Science in History,Cambridge, Mass., CambridgeUniversity Press, pp. 41-65.

BANZHAF, J.F. [1965], Weighted Vo-ting Doesn’t Work: A Mathema-tical Analysis, in «Rutgers LawReview», vol. 19, pp. 317-343.

BARDACH, E. [1976], Policy Termina-tion as a Political Process, in«Policy Sciences», vol. 7, n. 2,pp. 123-131.

— [1979] , The ImplementationGame: What Happens after a BillBecomes a Law , Cambridge,Mass. , The MIT Press. (I ed.1977).

— [1996], The Eight-Step Path ofPolicy Analysis, Berkeley, Calif.,Academic Press.

BARNES, B. [1988], The Nature ofPower, Cambridge, Polity.

BARON, D.P. e FEREJOHN, J.A.[1989], Bargaining in Legislatu-res, in «American Political Scien-ce Review», vol. 83, n. 4, pp.1181-1206.

BARRY, B. [1970], Sociologists, Eco-nomists and Democracy, London,Macmillan.

BARRY, B. e HARDIN, R. (a cura di)[1982], Rational Man and Irra-tional Society?, London-BeverlyHills, Calif., Sage.

BARTOLINI, S. [1986], Metodologiadella ricerca politica, in G. Pa-squino (a cura di), Manuale discienza della politica, Bologna, IlMulino, pp. 39-82.

BARZELAY , M. [1992] , Breaking


through Bureaucracy , Berkeley,Calif., University of CaliforniaPress.

BATES, R., GREIF, A., LEVI, M., RO-SENTHAL, J.-L. e WEINGAST, B.[2000], The Analytic NarrativeProject, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 94, n. 3,pp. 696-702.

— [1998], Analytic Narratives, Prin-ceton, N.J., Princeton UniversityPress.

BAUER, R.A., POOL, I.D.S. e DEXTER,L.A. [1963], American Businessand Public Policy, New York,Atherton.

BAUMGARTNER, F.R. e JONES, B.D.[1993], Agendas and Instabilityin American Politics, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

BEALEY, F. [1996], Democratic Eliti-sm and the Autonomy of Elites,in «International Political Scien-ce Review», vol. 17, n. 3, pp.319-331.

BEATO, F. (a cura di) [1991], La va-lutazione di impatto ambientale.Un approccio integrato, Milano,Angeli.

BEAUREGARD, R.A. [1998], The Dee-per Context of the ExperimentingSociety, in W.N. Dunn (a curadi), The Experimenting Society,New Brunswick, N.J., Transac-tion, pp. 211-227.

BECKER, G. [1983] , A Theory ofCompetition among PressureGroups for Political Influence, in«Quarterly Journal of Economi-cs», vol. 98, n. 3, pp. 371-400.BEER, S.H. [1956], Pressure

Groups and Parties in Britain, in«Ame- rican Political Science

Review»,vol. 50, n. 1, pp. 613-650.

BEER, R.D. [1990], Intelligence asAdaptive Behavior, San Diego,Calif., Academic Press.

BEHN, R. [1982], Policy Analysis andPolicy Politics, in R.C. Rist (a

cura di), Policy Studies ReviewAnnual, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage, vol. 6, pp. 83-110.

BENDOR , J.B. [1985], Parallel Sy-stems: Redudancy in Govern-ment, Berkeley, University ofCalifornia Press.

BENDOR, J.B. e MOE, T.M. [1985],An Adaptive Model of Bureaucra-tic Politics, in «American Politi-cal Science Review», vol. 79, n.3, pp. 755-774.

BENDOR, J. e SWISTAK, P. [1997],The Evolutionary Stability of Co-operation, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 91, n. 2,pp. 290-307.

BENDOR, J., TAYLOR, S. e VAN GAA-LEN , R. [1985] , BureaucraticExpertise vs. Legislative Authori-ty: A Model of Deception andMonitoring in Budgeting, in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 79, n. 4, pp. 1041-1060.

BENSON, B.L. [1984], Rent Seekingas a Justification for Privatization,in «Journal of ContemporaryStudies», vol. 7, n. 2, pp. 5-12.

BENTLEY, A.F. [1908], TheProcess of Government: A study of

Social Pressure, Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press; trad.

it. Il pro- cesso di governo: unostudio delle pressioni sociali, Milano,

Giuffré,1983.

BENVENISTE, G. [1977], Bureaucracy,San Francisco, Calif., Boyd &Fraser.

BERGER , P.L. e LUCKMAN N , T.[1966], The Social Constructionof Reality, New York, Double-day; trad. it. La realtà come co-struzione sociale, Bologna , IlMulino, 1969.

BERK, R.A. e ROSSI, P.H. [1990],Thinking about Program Evalua-tion, Newbury Park, Calif., Sage.

BERNDTSON, E. [1987], The Rise and


Fall of American Political Scien-ce: Personalities, Quotations, Spe-culations, in «International Poli-tical Science Review», vol. 8, n.1, pp. 85-100.

BERRY, F.S. e BERRY, W.D. [1999],Innovation and Diffusion Modelsin Policy Research, in Sabatier[1999, 169-200].

BERRY , J.M. [1989], The InterestGroup Society, Glenview, Ill.,Scott Foresman.

BERTALANFFY, L. VON [1968], Gene-ral System Theory: Foundations,Development, Applications, Lon-don, Allen & Unwin; trad. it.Teoria generale dei sistemi, Mila-no, ISEDI, 1971.

BEYME, K. VON [1986], Plea for Poli-cy Analysis, in «Policy StudiesJournal», vol. 14, n. 4, pp. 540-544.

— [1987], La scienza politica in Ita-lia. Uno sguardo dall’esterno, inL. Graziano (a cura di), La scien-za politica in Italia. Bilancio eprospettive, Milano, Angeli, pp.90-97.

BIMBER, B. [1998], The Internet andPolitical Transformation: Populi-sm, Community and AcceleratedPluralism, in «Polity», vol. 31, n.1, pp. 133-160.

BINMORE, K. [1998], Just Playing.Game Theory and the SocialContract, Cambridge, Mass., TheMIT Press.

BIRD, C. [2000], The Possibility ofSelf-Government, in «AmericanPolitical Science Review», vol.94, n. 3, pp. 563-577.

BLACK, D. [1948], On the Rationaleof Group Decision-Making, in«Journal of Political Economy»,vol. 56, n. 1, pp. 23-34.

— [1958], Theory of Committeesand Elections, Cambridge, Cam-bridge University Press.

BLACK, J. [1997], New Institutionali-

sm and Naturalism in Socio-LegalAnalysis: Institutionalist Approa-ches to Regulatory DecisionMaking, in «Law and Policy»,vol. 19, n. 1, pp. 52-93.

BLAIR, J.P. e MASER, S.M. [1978], AReassessment of Axiomatic Mo-dels in Policy Studies, in Tullocke Wagner [1978, 3-16].

BLONDEL, J. [1989], Decisioni di go-verno e vincoli partitici, in «Rivi-sta italiana di scienza politica»,vol. 19, n. 2, pp. 199-222.

BLUME, S.S. [1977], Policy as Theory:A Framework for Understandingthe Contribution of Social Scienceto Welfare Policy, in «Acta So-ciologica», vol. 20, n. 3, pp. 247-262.

BLUMER, H. [1969], Symbolic Inte-ractionism , Englewood Cliffs,N.J., Prentice-Hall.

BOARDMAN, A.E., GREENBERG, D.H.,VINING, A.R. e WEIMER, D.L.[1996], Cost-Benefit Analysis:Concepts and Practice, Englewo-od Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

BOBBIO, N. [1969], Saggi sulla scien-za politica in Italia, Bari, Laterza.

— [1973], Pareto e il sistema socia-le, Firenze, Sansoni.

— [1987], La scienza politica e latradizione di studi politici in Ita-lia, in L. Graziano (a cura di),La scienza politica in Italia. Bi-lancio e prospettive, Milano, An-geli, pp. 44-60.

BÖRZEL, T.A. [1998], Le reti di attoripubblici e privati nella regolazio-ne europea, in «Stato e merca-to», vol. 54, n. 3, pp. 389-432.

BOWLER, S., FARRELL, D.M. e KATZ,R.S. (a cura di) [1999], PartyDiscipline and Parliamentary Go-vernment, Columbus, Oh., OhioState University Press.

BOWLES, S. e GINTIS, H. [1993], TheRevenge of Homo Economicus:Contested Exchange and the Re-


vival of Political Economy , in«Journal of Economic Perspecti-ves», vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 83-102.

BRAMS, S.J. [1976], Paradoxes in Poli-tics, New York, The Free Press.

— [1985] , Rational Politics,Washington, D.C., Congressio-nal Quarterly Press.

— [1990], Negotiation Games: Ap-plying Game Theory to Bargai-ning and Arbitration, New York,Routledge.

BRANS, M. [1997], Challenges to thePractice and Theory of PublicAdministration in Europe, in«Journal of Theoretical Politics»,vol. 9, n. 3, pp. 389-415.

BRANS, M. e ROSSBACH, S. [1997],The Autopoiesis of Administrati-ve Systems: Niklas Luhmann onPublic Administration and PublicPolicy, in «Public Administra-tion», vol. 75, n. 3, pp. 417-439.

BRAYBROOKE, D. [1987], Philosophyof Social Science , EnglewoodCliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

BRAYBROOKE, D. e LINDBLOM, C.E.[1963], A Strategy of Decision:Policy Evaluation as a Social Pro-cess, New York, The Free Press.

BREHM, J. e GATES , S. [1997],Working, Shirking, and Sabotage:Bureaucratic Response to a De-mocratic Public, Ann Arbor, Uni-versity of Michigan Press.

BRENNAN, G. e BUCHANA N, J.M.[1988], Is Public Choice Immo-ral? The Case for the «Nobel»Lie, in «Virginia Law Review»,vol. 74, pp. 179-189.

BROSIO, G. [1986], Economia e fi-nanza pubblica, Roma, La NuovaItalia Scientifica.

BROWNE, A. e WILDAVSKY , A.[1984a], What Should EvaluationMean to Implementation?, in J.L.Pressman e A. Wildavsky (a curadi), Implementation , Berkeley,University of California Press,pp. 181-205.

— [1984b], Implementati on asexploration, in J.L. Pressman eA. Wildavsky (a cura di), Imple-mentation, Berkeley, Universityof California Press, pp. 232-256.

BRUSCHI, A. [1996], La competenzametodologica, Roma, La NuovaItalia Scientifica.

BUCHANAN, J.M. [1960], Social Choi-ce, Democracy, and Free Markets,in J.M. Buchanan, Fiscal Theoryand Political Economy, ChapelHill, University of North Caroli-na Press, pp. 75-81; trad. it. Scel-ta sociale, democrazia e mercatiliberi, in F. Forte e G. Mossetto(a cura di), Economia del benes-sere e democrazia, Milano, Ange-li, 1972, pp. 285-299.

— [1966], An Individualistic Theoryof political Process, in Easton[1966, 25-37].

— [1975], Public Finance and Pu-blic Choice, in «National TaxJournal», vol. 28, n. 4, pp. 383-394; trad. it. Finanza pubblica escelte pubbliche, in F. Forte e E.Granaglia (a cura di), La nuovaeconomia politica americana, Mi-lano, SugarCo, 1980, pp. 49-68.

— [1978], The Economics of Politics,London, Institute of EconomicAffairs.

— [1990], The Domain of Constitu-tional Economics, in «Constitu-tional Political Economy», vol.1, n. 1, pp. 1-18.

— [1993], Public Choice after Socia-lism, in «Public Choice», vol.77, n. 1, pp. 67-74.

BUCHANAN, J.M. e MUSGRAVE, R.A.[1999], Public Finance and Pu-blic Choice: Two Contrasting Vi-sions of the State, Cambridge,Mass., The MIT Press.

BUCHANAN, J.M. e TOLLISON, R.D.(a cura di) [1972], Theory of Pu-blic Choice, Ann Arbor, Univer-sity of Michigan Press.


BUCHANAN, J.M., TOLLISON, R.D. eTULLOCK, G. (a cura di) [1980],Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, College Station,Texas A&M University.

BUCHANAN, J.M. e TULLOCK, G.[1962], The Calculus of Consent,Ann Arbor, University of Michi-gan Press; trad. it. Il calcolo delconsenso: fondamenti logici dellademocrazia costituzionale, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino, 1998.

BUDGE, I. e HOFFERBERT, R. [1992],Il mandato di partito e il modellodi Westminster, in M. Calise (acura di), Come cambiano i parti-ti, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 123-146.

BURCH, M. [1993], Organizing theFlow of Business in Western Eu-ropean Cabinets, in J. Blondel eF. Müller-Rommel (a cura di),Governing Together, London,Macmillan.

BURNS, E. [1953], Social Security andPublic Policy, New York, Mc-Graw-Hill.

BUSCHOR, E. e SCHEDLER, K. (a curadi) [1993], Perspectives on Per-formance Measurement and Pu-blic Sector Accounting, Bern,Haupt.

CAIDEN, N. [1990], Public Budgetingin the United States: The State ofthe Discipline, in Lynn e Wilda-vsky [1990, 228-255].

CAIN, B., FEREJOHN, J. e FIORINA,M. [1987], The Personal Vote.Constituency Service and Electo-ral Independence, Cambridge,Mass., Harvard University Press.

CALISE, M. [1989], Governo di parti-to: antecedenti e conseguenze inAmerica, Bologna, Il Mulino.

— [1999] , Introduzione , in T.J.Lowi, La scienza delle politiche,Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. xi-xl.

CALISTA, D.J. [1994], Policy Imple-

mentation, in S.S. Nagel (a curadi), Encyclopedia of Policy Stu-dies, New York, Marcel Dekker,vol. II, pp. 117-155.

CALVERT, R.L. [1985], Robustness ofthe Multidimensional Voting Mo-del: Candidate Motivations, Un-certainty, and Convergence, in«American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 29, n. 1, pp. 69-95.

— [1995], Rational Actors, Equili-brium, and Social Institutions, inJ. Knight e I. Sened (a cura di),Explaining Social Institutions,Ann Arbor, University of Michi-gan Press, pp. 57-93.

CALVERT, R.L. e FENNO , R.F.[1994], Strategy and Sophistica-ted Voting in the Senate, in«Journal of Politics», vol. 56, n.2, pp. 349-376.

CAMPBELL, D.T. [1998], The Experi-menting Society, in W.N. Dunn(a cura di), The ExperimentingSociety, New Brunswick, N.J.,Transaction, pp. 35-68.

CAMPBELL, D.T. e STANLEY, J.C.[1963], Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Resear-ch, Chicago, Ill., Rand McNally.

CANON, B.C. [1991], Courts and Po-licy: Compliance, Implementationand Impact, in J.E. Gates e C.A.Johnson (a cura di), The Ameri-can Courts: A Critical Assess-ment, Washington, D.C., Con-gressional Quarterly Press.

CARLEY, M. [1980], Rational Techni-ques in Policy Analysis, London,Heinemann.

CARLSSON, L. [1996], Nonhierarchi-cal Implementation Analysis. AnAlternative to the MethodologicalMismatch in Policy Analysis, in«Journal of Theoretical Politics»,vol. 8, n. 4, pp. 527-546.

CARSON, N. [1992], Process, Pre-science, and Pragmatism: The Of-fice of Technology Assessment, inWeiss [1992, 236-251].


CASTLES, F.G. (a cura di) [1982],The Impact of Parties: Politicsand Policies in Democratic Capi-talist State, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage.

— [1989], The Comparative Historyof Public Policy, New York,Oxford University Press.

CASTLES, F.G. e MCKINLAY, R.D.[1979], Does Politics Matter? AnAnalysis of the Public WelfareCommitment in Advanced Demo-cratic States, in «European Jour-nal of Political Research», vol. 7,pp. 169-186.

CASTLES, F.G. e WILDENMANN, R. (acura di) [1986], The Future ofParty Government . 1: Visionsand Realities of Party Govern-ment , Berlin-New York, DeGruyter.

CATER, D. [1959], The Fourth Branchof Government, Boston, Mass.,Houghton Mifflin.

— [1964], Power in Washington ,New York, Random House.

CATLIN, G.E. [1927], The Scienceand Method of Politics, NewYork, Knopf.

CAWSON, A. [1978], Pluralism, Cor-poratism and the Role of the Sta-te, in «Government and Opposi-tions», vol. 13, n. 2, pp. 178-198; trad. it. Pluralismo, corpora-tivismo e ruolo dello stato, inMaraffi [1981, 283-300].

— (a cura di) [1985], Organized In-terests and the State. Studies inMeso-Corporatism, London, Sage.

CAZZOLA, F. e MORISI, M. [1996],La mutua diffidenza: il reciprococontrollo tra magistrati e politicinella prima Repubblica, Milano,Feltrinelli.

CHARLESWORTH, J.C. (a cura di)[1967], Contemporary PoliticalAnalysis, New York, The FreePress; trad. it. Teorie e metodi inscienza politica, Bologna, Il Muli-no, 1971.

CHIARAMONTE, A. [1996], L’effettomancato della riforma maggiorita-ria: il voto strategico, in «Rivistaitaliana di scienza politica», vol.26, n. 3, pp. 703-726.

CHURCHMAN, W.C. [1975], Thinkingfor Decisions: Deductive Quanti-tative Methods, Chicago, Ill.,SRA.

CHURCHMAN, W.C. e MITROFF, I.I.[1998] , The Management ofScience and the Mismanagementof the World, in W.N. Dunn (acura di), The Experimenting So-ciety, New Brunswick, N.J.,Transaction, pp. 103-123.

CLARK , T.N. (a cura di) [1968] ,Community Structure and Deci-sion-Making, San Francisco, Ca-lif., Chandler.

COASE, R.H. [1937], The Nature ofthe Firm, in «Economica», vol.4, pp. 386-405; trad. it. La natu-ra dell’impresa, in Impresa merca-to e diritto, Bologna, Il Mulino,1995, pp. 73-96.

— [1960], The Problem of SocialCost, in «Journal of Law andEconomics», vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 1-44; trad. it. Il problema dei costisociali, in F. Forte e E. Grana-glia (a cura di), La nuova econo-mia politica americana, Milano,SugarCo, pp. 117-131.

COBB, R.W. e ELDER, C.D. [1972],Participation in American Politics:The Dynamics of Agenda-buil-ding, Boston, Mass., Allyn andBacon.

— [1981], Communication and Pu-blic Policy, in D.D. Nimmo eK.R. Sanders (a cura di), Han-dbook of Political Communica-tion, London-Beverly Hills, Ca-lif., Sage, pp. 391-416.

— [1983], Participation in AmericanPolitics: The Dynamics of Agen-da-Building , Baltimora , Md.,Johns Hopkins University Press.


COBB, R.W., ROSS , J.K. e ROSS ,M.H. [1976], Agenda Building asa Comparative Political Process,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 70, n. 1, pp. 126-138.

COHEN, E. [1992], Le Colbertism«High Tech», Paris, Pluriel.

COHEN , D.K. e L INDBLOM, C.E.[1979a] , Usable Knowledge ,New Haven, Conn., Yale Uni-versity Press.

— [1979b], Solving Problems of Bu-reaucracy: Limits on Social Scien-ce, in «American BehavioralScientist», vol. 22, n. 5, pp. 547-560.

COHEN , J.E. [1995] , PresidentialRhetoric and the Public Agenda,in «American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 39, n. 1, pp. 87-107.

COHEN, M.D. e MARCH, J.G. [1974],Leadership and Ambiguity, NewYork, McGraw-Hill.

COHEN, M.D., MARCH, J.G. e OL-SEN, J.P. [1972], A Garbage CanModel of Organizational Choice,in «Administrative ScienceQuarterly», vol. 17, pp. 1-25.

COLEBATCH, H.K. [1995], Organiza-tional Meanings of Program Eva-luation, in «Policy Sciences»,vol. 28, n. 2, pp. 149-164.

COLLIE, M.P. [1988], The Legislatureand Distributive Policy Makingin Formal Perspective, in «Legi-slative Studies Quarterly», vol.13, n. 4, pp. 427-458.

COLLINS, R. [1992], The Romanticismof Agency/Structure versus theAnalysis of Micro/Macro, in«Current Sociology», vol. 40, n.1, pp. 77-97.

CONLAN, T.J., BEAM, D.R. e WRI-GHTSON , M.T. [1995] , PolicyModels and Political Change: In-sights from the Passage of TaxReform, in M.K. Landy e M.A.

Levin (a cura di), The New Poli-tics of Public Policy, Baltimore,Md., Johns Hopkins UniversityPress, pp. 121-142.

CONVERSE, P.E. [1975], Public Opi-nion and Voting Behavior , inGreenstein e Polsby [1975, 75-169].

COOK, THOMAS [1985], PostpositivistCritical Multiplism , in L.R.Shotland e M. Melvin (a curadi), Social Science and Social Poli-cy, Newbury Park, Calif., Sage,pp. 21-62.

COOK, TERENCE, E. [1994], Criteriaof Social Scientific Knowledge ,Lanham, Md., Rowman & Litt-lefield.

COOK, TIMOTHY, E. [1998], Gover-ning with the News: The NewsMedia as a Political Institution,Chicago, Ill., University of Chi-cago Press.

COTTA, M. [1989], Il contributo dei«policy studies» alla scienza poli-tica contemporanea, in A. Pane-bianco (a cura di), L’analisi dellapolitica, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp.517-541.

COTTA, M. e ISERNIA, P. (a cura di)[1996], Il gigante dai piedi di ar-gilla, Bologna, Il Mulino.

COX, G.W. e MCCUBBINS , M.D.[1992], Legislative Leviathan:Party Government in the House,Berkeley, University of Califor-nia Press.

CRONBACH, L.J. [1982], DesigningEvaluations of Educational andSocial Programs, San Francisco,Calif., Jossey-Bass.

CRONBACH, L.J. et al. [1980],Toward Reform of Program Eva-luation, San Francisco, Calif.,Jossey-Bass.

CROSSMAN, R.H. [1972], The Politicsof Pensions, Liverpool, LiverpoolUniversity Press.

CROZIER, M. [1963], The Bureaucra-


tic Phenomenon, Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press;trad. it. Il fenomeno burocratico,Milano, Etas Libri, 1978.

— [1987], État modeste, état moder-ne: Stratégie pour un autre chan-gement, Paris, Fayard; trad. it.Stato modesto, stato moderno,Roma, Edizioni Lavoro, 1988.

CROZIER, M. e FRIEDBERG, E. [1977],L’Acteur et le Systeme. Le con-traintes de l’action collective, Pa-ris, Seuil; trad. it. Attore sociale esistema, Milano, Etas Libri,1978.

CULYER, A.J. [1980], The PoliticalEconomy of Socia l Policy,Oxford, Robertson.

CURTIS, E. e SCHOETTLE, B. [1968],The State of the Art in PolicyStudies , in R.A. Bauer e K.J.Gergen (a cura di), The Study ofPolicy Formation , New York,The Free Press, pp. 149-179.

CYERT, R.M. e WELSCH, L.A. (a curadi) [1970], Decision in Manage-ment Decision Making, Harmon-dsworth, Penguin.

DAALDER, H. [1983], The Comparati-ve Study of European Parties andParty Systems: An Overview, inH. Daalder e P. Mair (a curadi), Western European Party Sy-stems , London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage, pp. 1-27.

DAHL, R.A. [1947], The Science ofPublic Administration: ThreeProblems, in «Public Administra-tion Review», vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 1-11.

— [1957], Decision-making in a De-mocracy: The Supreme Court as aNational Policymaker, in «Jour-nal of Public Law», vol. 6, pp.279-295.

— [1961a], Who Governs? Demo-cracy and Power in an AmericanCity, New Haven, Conn., YaleUniversity Press.

— [1961b], The Behavioral Approa-ch in Political Science: Epitaphfor a Monument to a SuccessfulProtest, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 55, n. 3,pp. 763-772.

— [1970], After the Revolution?Authority in a Good Society,New Haven, Conn., Yale Uni-versity Press.

DAHL, R.A. e LINDBLOM , C.E.[1953], Politics, Economics andWelfare, Chicago, Ill., Universityof Chicago Press.

D’ALIMONTE, R. [1977], Sulla teoriadella democrazia competitiva, in«Rivista italiana di scienza politi-ca», vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 3-25.

DALLMAYR, F.R. [1986], Critical The-ory and Public Policy, in W.N.Dunn (a cura di), Policy Analy-sis: Perspectives , Concepts andMethods, Greenwich, Conn., JAI

Press, pp. 41-67.DALTON, R. [19962], Citizen Politics:

Public Opinion and Political Par-ties in Advanced Industrial De-mocracies , Chatham, ChathamHouse.

DANEKE, G.A. [1989], On Paradig-matic Progress in Public Policyand Administration, in «PolicyStudies Journal», vol. 17, n. 2,pp. 277-296.

DASGUPTA, A.K., MARGLIN, S.A. eSEN, A.K. [1972], Guidelines forProject Evaluation, New York,UNIDO; trad. it. Guida per la va-lutazione dei progetti, Napoli,FORMEZ, 1985.

DAVID, P.A. [1985], Clio and theEconomics of QWERTY, in «Ame-rican Economic Review», vol.75, n. 2, pp. 332-337.

— [2001], Path Dependence, Its Cri-tics and the Quest for «HistoricalEconomics», in P. Garrouste e S.Ioannides (a cura di), Evolutionand Path Dependence in Econo-


mic Ideas: Past and Present,Cheltenham, Elgar.

DAVIS, G. [1997], Toward a HollowState? Managerialism and Its Cri-tics, in M. Considine e M. Pain-ter (a cura di), Managerialism:The Great Debate, Melbourne,Melbourne University Press, pp.208-223.

DAVIS, R. e OWEN, D. [1998], NewMedia and American Politics,New York, Oxford UniversityPress.

DAVIS, M.L. e PORTER, P.K. [1989],Identifying Pure and ApparentIdeology in Congressional Voting,in «Public Choice», vol. 60, n. 2,pp. 101-112.

DAWSON, R.E. e ROBINSON, J.A.[1963], Inter-party Competition,Economic Variables and WelfarePolicies in the American State, in«Journal of Politics», vol. 25, n.2, pp. 265-289.

DELEAU, M. (a cura di) [1986], Eva-luer les politiques publiques:méthode, déontologie, organisa-tion. Rapport pour le Commissa-riat General au Plan, Paris, Do-cumentation Française.

DELEON, P. [1988], Advice and Con-sent: The Development of thePolicy Sciences, New York, Rus-sell Sage Foundation.

— [1999], The Stages Approach tothe Policy Process, in Sabatier[1999, 19-32].

DELLA PORTA, D. e VANNUCCI, A.[1994], Corruzione politica e am-ministrazione pubblica: risorse,meccanismi, attori, Bologna, IlMulino.

DEMING, E.W. [1986], Out of theCrisis, Cambridge, Mass., TheMIT Press; trad. it. L’impresa diqualità, Torino, ISEDI, 1989.

DEMSETZ, H. [1969], Informationand Efficiency: Another View-point, in «Journal of Law and

Economics», vol. 12, n. 1, pp. 1-22.

DENTE, B. [1985], Governare la fram-mentazione, Bologna, Il Mulino.

— [1995] , In un diverso stato.Come rifare la pubblica ammini-strazione italiana, Bologna, IlMulino.

DENTE, B. e REGONINI, G. [1987],Politica e politiche in Italia, in P.Lange e M. Regini (a cura di),Stato e regolazione sociale, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino, pp. 83-121.

DENZAU , A.T. e NORTH, D.C.[1994], Shared Mental Models:Ideologies and Institutions, in«Kyklos», vol. 47, n. 1, pp. 3-31.

DENZAU, A.T., RIKER, W.H. e SHEP-SLE, K.A. [1985], Farquharsonand Fenno: Sophisticated Votingand Home Style, in «AmericanPolitical Science Review», vol.79, n. 4, pp. 1117-1134.

DENZIN, N.K. [1978], The ResearchAct: A Theoretical Introductionto Sociological Methods , NewYork, McGraw-Hill.

— [1989], Interpretive Interactionism,Newbury Park, Calif., Sage.

DERTHICK, M. [1972], New TownsIn-Town: Why a Federal Pro-gram Failed, Washington, D.C.,Urban Institute.

— [1990] , Agency under Stress,Washington, D.C., The BrookingsInstitution.

DERY, D. [1984], Problem Definitionin Policy Analysis, Lawrence,University Press of Kansas.

DEUTSCH, K.W. [1963], The Nervesof Government, New York, TheFree Press; trad. it. I nervi delpotere, Milano, Etas Kompass,1972.

DEVONS, E. [1961], Essays in Econo-mics, London, Allen & Unwin.DEWEY, J. [1910], How WeThink: A Restatement of the

Relation of Reflective Thinking tothe Educa-


tive Process, Boston, Mass., Hea-th; trad. it. Come pensiamo, Fi-renze, La Nuova Italia, 1961.

— [1916], Democracy and Educa-tion, New York, Macmillan;trad. it. Democrazia e educazione,Firenze, La Nuova Italia, 1994.

— [1927], The Public and Its Pro-blems, New York, Holt; trad. it.Comunità e potere, Firenze, LaNuova Italia, 1971.

— [1929], The Quest for Certainty:A Study of the Relation of Know-ledge and Action , New York,Minton Balch.

— [1938], Logic, the Theory of In-quiry, New York, Henry Holt;trad. it. Logica: Teoria dell’inda-gine, Torino, Einaudi, 1949.

DEWEY, J. e BENTLEY, A.F. [1945],Knowing and the Known, Bo-ston, Mass., Beacon Press; trad.it. Conoscenza e transazione, Fi-renze, La Nuova Italia, 1974.

DIAMANT, A. [1981], Bureaucracyand Public Policy in Neocorpora-tist Settings , in «ComparativePolitics», vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 101-124.

DIANI, M. [1988], Isole nell’arcipela-go: il movimento ecologista inItalia, Bologna, Il Mulino.

DIMAGGIO, P.J. e POWELL, W.W.[1991], Introduction, in W.W.Powell e P.J. DiMaggio, TheNew Institutionalism in Organi-zational Analysis, Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press, pp.1-38.

DIXIT, A. e NALEBUFF, B. [1991],Thinking Strategically: The Com-petitive Edge in Business, Politi-cs, and Everyday Life, NewYork, Norton; trad. it. Io vinco,tu perdi: strategie di successo nelbusiness e nella vita, Milano, IlSole-24 Ore Libri, 1993.

DOBEL, P.J. [1988], Reflection andGood Reasons in Policy Analysis,

in E.B. Portis e M.B. Levy (acura di), Handbook of PoliticalTheory and Policy Science, We-stport, Conn., Greenwood Press,pp. 29-44.

DOGAN, M. [1996], Political Scienceand the Other Social Sciences, inR.E. Goodin e H.-D. Klinge-mann (a cura di), A New Han-dbook of Political Science,Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 97-130.

DOLOWIT Z, D.P. e MARSH, D.[1996], Who Learns What fromWhom: A Review of the PolicyTransfer Literature, in «PoliticalStudies», vol. 44, n. 2, pp. 343-357.

DORFMAN, R. [1978], Forty Years ofCost-Benefit Analysis, in R. Sto-ne e W. Peterson (a cura di),Econometric Contributions toPublic Policy, London, Macmil-lan, pp. 268-284.

DORN, J.A. [1991], Madison’s Consti-tutional Political Economy: Prin-ciples for a Liberal Order , in«Constitutiona l Political Eco-nomy», vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 163-186.

DORON, G. [1992], Policy Sciences:The State of the Discipline, in«Policy Studies Review», vol. 11,n. 3-4, pp. 303-309.

DOUGLAS, M. [1986], How Institu-tions Think, Syracuse, Kans.,Syracuse University Press; trad.it. Come pensano le istituzioni,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1990.

DOUGLAS, M. e W ILDAVSKY , A.[1982], Risk and Culture. AnEssay on the Selection of Techni-cal and Environmental Dangers,Berkeley, University of Califor-nia Press.

DOWDING, K. [1994], The Compati-bility of Behaviouralism, RationalChoice and «New Institutionali-sm», in «Journal of TheoreticalPolitics», vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 105-117.


DOWNS, A. [1957], An EconomicTheory of Democracy, NewYork, Harper and Row; trad. it.La teoria economica della demo-crazia, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1988.

— [1967], Inside Bureaucracy, Bo-ston, Mass., Little, Brown.

— [1972], Up and Down with Eco-logy: The Issue-Attention Cycle,in «The Public Interest», vol. 28,n. 1, pp. 8-50.

DROR, Y. [1964], Muddling Through:«Science» or Inertia?, in «PublicAdministration Review», vol. 24,n. 2, pp. 153-157.

— [1971], Design for Policy Scien-ces, New York, Elsevier.

— [1983], Basic Concepts in PolicyStudies, in S.S. Nagel (a cura di),Encyclopedia of Policy Studies,New York, Marcel Dekker, pp.3-10.

— [1994], Basic Concepts in Advan-ced Policy Studies, in S.S. Nagel(a cura di), Encyclopedia of Poli-cy Studies, New York, MarcelDekker, pp. 1-30.

DRUCKER, P.F. [1954], The Practiceof Management, New York,Harper and Row.

— [1969], The Age of Discontinui-ty: Guidelines to Our ChangingSociety, New York, Harper andRow; trad. it. L’era del disconti-nuo , Milano, Etas Kompass,1970.

— [1985], Innovation and Enterpre-neurship: Practice and Principles,New York, Harper and Row;trad. it. Innovazione e imprendi-torialità , Milano, Etas Libri,1986.

DRYZEK, J.S. [1990], Discursive De-mocracy: Politics, Policy and Poli-tical Science, Cambridge, Cam-bridge University Press.

DUDLEY, G., PARSONS, W., RADAEL-LI, C.M. e SABATIER, P.A.[2000], Symposium: Theories of

the Policy Process, in «Journal ofEuropean Public Policy», vol. 7,n. 1, pp. 122-140.

DUNLEAVY , P. [1991], Democracy,Bureaucracy and Public Choice,Brighton, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

DUNN, W.N. [1981], Public PolicyAnalysis. An Introduction, En-glewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

— [1983], Reform as Arguments, in«Knowledge: Creation, Diffu-sion, Utilization», vol. 3, n. 2,pp. 293-326.

— [1998], Campbell’s Experimen-ting Society: Prospect and Retros-pect, in W.N. Dunn (a cura di),The Experimenting Society, NewBrunswick, N.J., Transaction,pp. 1-34.

DURAN, P. e MONNIER, E. [1992], Ledeveloppment de l’evaluation enFrance. Necessite technique etexigences politique , in «RevueFrancaise de Science Politique»,vol. 42, n. 2, pp. 235-262; trad.it. Lo sviluppo della valutazionedelle politiche pubbliche in Fran-cia: necessità tecnica ed esigenzepolitiche, in «Problemi di ammi-nistrazione pubblica», vol. 18,1993, pp. 199-241.

DYE, T.R. [1966], Politics, Economics,and The Public, Chicago, Ill.,Rand McNally.

— [1969], Executive Power and Pu-blic Policy in the States, in «We-stern Political Quarterly», vol.22, n. 4, pp. 926-939.

— [19873], Understanding PublicPolicy, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall (I ed. 1972; II ed.1975).

EASTON, D. [1953], The Political Sy-stem: An Inquiry into the State ofPolitical Science, New York,Knopf (II ed. ampliata 1971);trad. it. Il sistema politico, Mila-no, Comunità, 1973.


— [1965], A Framework for Politi-cal Analysis, Englewood Cliffs,N.J., Prentice-Hall.

— (a cura di) [1966], Varieties ofPolitical Theory, Englewood Clif-fs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

— [1969], The New Revolution inPolitical Science, in «AmericanPolitical Science Review», vol.63, n. 4, pp. 1051-1061; trad. it.in D. Easton, Il sistema politico,Milano, Comunità , 1973, pp.349-375.

— [1971] , Epilogue, in Easton[1953]; trad. it. in D. Easton, Ilsistema politico, Milano, Comu-nità, 1973, pp. 376-405.

— [1985], Political Science in theUnited States: Past and Present,in «International Political Scien-ce Review», vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 133-152.

ECKSTEIN, H. [1960], Pressure GroupPolitics: The Case of the BritishMedical Association , London,Allen & Unwin.

EDELMAN, M. [1960], Symbols andPolitical Quiescence, in «Ameri-can Political Science Review»,vol. 54, n. 3, pp. 695-704.

— [1964] , The Symbolic Uses ofPolitics, Urbana, University ofIllinois Press; trad. it. Gli usisimbolici della politica, Napoli,Guida, 1987.

— [1988], Constructing the PoliticalSpectacle, Chicago, Ill., Universi-ty of Chicago Press.

EDELMAN, M. e FLEMING, R.W.[1965], The Politics of Wage-Pri-ce Decisions . A Four-CountryAnalysis, Urbana, University ofIllinois Press.

EISENSTADT, S.N. e LEMARCHAND, R.(a cura di) [1981] , PoliticalClientelism, Patronage, and Deve-lopment, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage.

ELDER, C.D. e COBB, R.W. [1984],

Agenda-Building and the Politicsof Aging, in «Policy StudiesJournal», vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 115-129.

ELLIOTT, E.W. e KIEL, L.D. (a curadi) [1999], Nonlinear Dynamics,Complexity and Public Policy,Commack, N.Y., Nova Science.

ELMORE, R.F. [1982] , BackwardMapping: Implementation Resear-ch and Policy Decisions, in W.Williams et al. (a cura di), Stu-dying Implementation: Methodo-logical and Administrative Issues,Chatham, Chatham House, pp.18-35.

ELSTER, J. [1994], The Nature andScope of Rational-Choice Expla-nation, in E. LePore e B.McLaughlin (a cura di), Actionsand Events: Perspectives on Do-nald Davidson, Oxford,Blackwell , pp. 60-72; rist. inMartin e McIntyre [1994, 403-412].

— [2000], Rational Choice History:A Case of Excessive Ambition, in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 94, n. 3, pp. 685-695.

ENELO W, J.M. e H INICH , M.J.[1984] , The Spatial Theory ofVoting: An Introduction, Cam-bridge, Mass., Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

ENTHOVEN , A.C. e SMITH , W.C.[1972], How Much is Enough:Shaping the Defense Program1961-69, New York, Harper andRow.

EPSTEIN, D. e O’HALLORAN, S.[1999], Delegating Powers: ATransactions-Cost Approach toPolicy Making Under SeparatedPowers, New York, CambridgeUniversity Press.

ERNST, G.W. e NEWELL, A. [1969],GPS: A Case Study in Generalityand Problem Solving, New York,Academic Press.


ESKRIDG E, W.N. e FEREJOHN, J.[1992], The Article I, Section 7Game, in «Georgetow n LawJournal», vol. 80, pp. 523-564.

ETZIONI, A. [1967], MixedScanning: A Third Approach to

Decision Making, in «PublicAdministra- tion Review», vol. 27,

n. 6, pp.387-392.

— [1968], The Active Society, NewYork, The Free Press.

— [1971], Policy Research, in «TheAmerican Sociologist» , vol. 6,n.s., pp. 8-12.

— [1985], Making Policy for Com-plex Systems: A Medical Modelfor Economics, in «Journal ofPolicy Analysis and Manage-ment», vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 383-395.

EULAU, H. [1977], The Interventio-nist Synthesis, in «AmericanJournal of Political Science», vol.21, n. 2, pp. 415-432.

— [1978], Policy-making in Ameri-can Cities, in Eulau e Wahlke[1978, 177-304].

EULAU, H. e WAHLKE, J.C. (a curadi) [1978], The Politics of Repre-sentation, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage.

FARBER, D.A. e FRICKEY, P.P.[1991], Law and Public Choice:A Critical Introduction, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

FARQUHARSON, R. [1969], The The-ory of Voting, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

FARR, R.M. e MOSCOVICI, S. (a curadi) [1984], Social representations,Cambridge, Cambridge Universi-ty Press; trad. it. Rappresentazio-ni sociali, Bologna, Il Mulino,1989.

FARR, J. e SEIDELMAN, R. (a cura di)[1993], Discipline and History.Political Science in the UnitedStates, Ann Arbor, University ofMichigan Press.

FENNO, R.F. [1973], Congressmen inCommittees, Boston, Mass., Litt-le, Brown.

— [1978] , Home Style, Boston,Mass., Little, Brown.

FERGUSON, Y.H. e MANSBACH, R.W.[1996], Polities. Authority, Iden-tities, and Change, Columbia,University of South CarolinaPress.

FERRERA, M. [1984], Il Welfare Statein Italia: sviluppo e crisi in pro-spettiva comparata, Bologna, IlMulino.

— [1989], Le politiche pubbliche, inL. Morlino (a cura di), Scienzapolitica , Torino, FondazioneGiovanni Agnelli, pp. 241-258.

FEYERABEND, P.K. [1970], Consola-tions for the Specialis t, in I.Lakatos e A. Musgrave (a curadi), Criticism and the Growth ofKnowledge, Cambridge, Cambri-dge University Press, pp. 197-230; trad. it. in I. Lakatos e A.Musgrave (a cura di), Critica ecrescita della conoscenza, Milano,Feltrinelli, 1976, pp. 277-312.

FELDMAN, E.J. [1978], ComparativePublic Policy: Review Article, in«Comparative Politics», vol. 8,gennaio, pp. 287-305.

FILIPPI, F. [1985], Introduzione, inH.A. Simon, Causalità, razionali-tà, organizzazione , Bologna, IlMulino, 1985, pp. 9-39.

FINER, S.E. [1958], Anonymous Em-pire, London, Pall Mall.

FIORINA, M.P. [1975], Formal Modelsin Political Science, in «AmericanJournal of Political Science», vol.19, n. 1, pp. 133-159.

— [1981], Universalism, Reciproci-ty, and Distributive Policymakingin Majority Rule Institutions, inJ.P. Crecine (a cura di), Researchin Public Policy Analysis andManagement, Greenwich, Conn.,JAI Press, vol. 1, pp. 197-221.


— [1987], Party Government in theUnited States: Diagnosis and Pro-gnosis, in Katz [1987, 270-300].

— [1996], Rational Choice, Empiri-cal Contributions, and the Scien-tific Enterprise, in Friedman[1996, 85-94].

FIORINA, M.P. e PLOTT, C.R. [1978],Committee Decisions underMajority Rule: An ExperimentalStudy, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 72, n. 2,pp. 575-598.

FISCHER, F. [1987], Policy Expertiseand the «New Class»: A Critiqueof the Neoconservative Thesis, inF. Fischer e J. Forester (a curadi), Confronting Values in PolicyAnalysis. The Politics of Criteria,Newbury Park, Calif., Sage, pp.94-126.

FISCHER, F. e FORESTER, J. (a curadi) [1993], The ArgumentativeTurn in Policy Analysis and Plan-ning, Durham, N.C., Duke Uni-versity Press.

FISICHELLA, D. (a cura di) [1972],Partiti e gruppi di pressione, Bo-logna, Il Mulino.

— [1988], Lineamenti di scienzapolitica, Roma, La Nuova ItaliaScientifica.

FLEMMING, R.B., BOTHE, J. e WOOD,D.B. [1997], One Voice AmongMany: The Supreme Court’s In-fluence on Attentiveness to Issuesin the United States, 1947-1992,in «American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 41, n. 4, pp. 1224-1250.

FLORA, P. e HEIDENHEIMER, A.J. (acura di) [1981], The Develop-ment of Welfare States in Europeand America, New Brunswick,N.J., Transaction; trad. it. Lo svi-luppo del welfare state in Europae in America, Bologna, Il Muli-no, 1983.

FLORIO, M. [1991], La valutazione

degli investimenti pubblici, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino.

FLORIO, M. e ROBOTTI, L. [1993],Valutazione della spesa regionalee riforma dei fondi strutturaliCEE, Bologna, Il Mulino.

FODOR, J.A. [1974], Special Sciences,or the Disunity of Science as aWorking Hypothesis, in «Synthe-se», vol. 28, pp. 97-115.

FØLLESDAL, A. e KOSLOWSKI, P. (acura di) [1997], Democracy andthe European Union, Berlin,Springer.

FONER, E. [1984], Why Is There NoSocialism In The United States?,in «History Workshop», vol. 17,pp. 57-80.

FORESTE R, J. [1982] , The PolicyAnalysis-Critical Theory Affair:Wildavsky and Habermas as Bed-fellows?, in «Journal of PublicPolicy», vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 145-164.

FORMEZ [1976], L’analisi costi-benefi-ci. Aspetti e problemi generali,Napoli.

FOSTER, J.L. [1978], The Politics ofPolicy Analysis, in W.D. Coplin(a cura di), Teaching Policy Stu-dies, Lexington, Mass., Lexin-gton Books, pp. 69-75.

FOSTE R, C.D. e PLOWDE N, F.J.[1996], Unstressing The State: AChecklist, in «Political Quarter-ly», vol. 67, n. 4, pp. 321-324.

FOX, C.J. [1990], ImplementationResearch: Why and How to Tra-scend Positivist Methodologies, inD.J. Palumbo e D.J. Calista (acura di), Implementation and thePolicy Process, Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press, pp. 199-212.

FREDERICKSON, G.H. [1997], The Spi-rit of Public Administration, SanFrancisco, Calif., Jossey-Bass.

— [1999] , The Repositioning ofAmerican Public Administration,in «PS: Political Science and Po-litics», vol. 32, n. 4, pp. 701-711.


FREDDI, G. [1986], Bureaucratic Ra-tionalities and the Prospect forParty Government , in Castles eWildenmann [1986, 143-177].

FREEMAN, J.L. [1965], The PoliticalProcess: Executive Bureau-Legi-slative Committee Relations,New York, Random House.

FREEMAN, L.C. [1979], Centrality inSocial Networks: Conceptual Cla-rification, in «Social Networks»,vol. 1, pp. 215-239.

FREY, B.S. [1997], Not Just for theMoney: An Economic Theory ofPersonal Motivation, Chel-tenham, Elgar.

FRIEDMAN, D.D. [19992], Price The-ory: An Intermediate Text, Cin-cinnati, Oh., South-Western Pu-blishing Co.

FRIEDMAN, J. [1996], The RationalChoice Controversy, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

FRIEDMAN, M. [1953], Essay in Posi-tive Economics , Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press;trad. it. parziale La metodologiadell’economia positiva, in Meto-do, consumo e moneta, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1996, pp. 93-136.

FROMAN, L.A., JR. [1968], The Cate-gorization of Policy Contents, inRanney [1968, 41-52].

FUDENBER G, D. e LEVINE, D.K.[1998], The Theory of Learningin Games, Cambridge , Mass,The MIT Press.

GARFINKEL, H. [1967], Studies inEthnomethodology, Englewood,Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

GARSON, D.G. [1986], From PolicyScience to Policy Analysis : AQuarter Century of Progress, inW.N. Dunn (a cura di), PolicyAnalysis: Perspectives, Conceptsand Methods, Greenwich, Conn.,JAI Press, pp. 3-22.

GEERTZ, C. [1973], Thick Descrip-

tion: Toward an Interpretive The-ory of Culture, in C. Geertz, TheInterpretation of Cultures, NewYork, Basic Books, pp. 3-30;trad. it. Verso una teoria interpre-tativa della cultura in C. Geertz,Interpretazione di culture, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino, 1998, pp. 9-42.

GHERARDI, S. [1997], La rappresenta-zione sociale della competenza inuna burocrazia che apprende, in«Il nuovo governo locale», vol.15, n. 1, pp. 25-58.

GIANNETTI, D. [1993], Il neo-istitu-zionalismo in scienza politica: ilcontributo della teoria della sceltarazionale, in «Rivista italiana discienza politica», vol. 23, n. 1,pp. 153-183.

GIDDENS, A. [1977], Studies in Socialand Political Theory, New York,Basic Books.

GILLIGAN, T.W. e KREHBIEL, K.[1987] , Collective Decision-making and Standing Committe-es: An Informational Rationalefor Restrictive Amendment Proce-dures, in «Journal of Law, Eco-nomics, and Organization», vol.3, n. 2, pp. 287-335.

G INSBER G , B., MEBAN E , W.R. eSHEFTER, M. [1995], The Presi-dency and Interest Groups: WhyPresidents Cannot Govern, in M.Nelson (a cura di), The Presiden-cy and the Political System,Washington, D.C., Congressio-nal Quarterly Press, IV ed., pp.331-347.

GLEICK, J. [1987], Chaos: Making aNew Science, London, Heine-mann; trad. it. Caos , Milano,Rizzoli, 1989.

GOFFMAN, E. [1974], Frame Analy-sis: An Essay on the Organizationof Experience, New York, Har-per and Row.

GOLDSTEIN, J. e KEOHANE, R.O. (acura di) [1993], Ideas and Forei-


gn Policy, Ithaca, N.Y., CornellUniversity Press.

GOLDWIN, R.A. (a cura di) [1980],Bureaucrats, Policy Analysts, Sta-tesman: Who Leads?, Washing-ton, D.C., American EnterpriseInstitute.

GOLEMBIEWSKI, R.T. [1977], A Criti-que of «Democratic Administra-tion» and Its Supporting Ideation,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 71, n. 4, pp. 1488-1507; trad. it. Critica del-l’«amministrazione democratica»e del suo substrato concettuale, in

«Problemi di amministrazionepubblica», 1978, vol. 3, n. 3-4,pp. 9-70.

GOODIN, R.E. [2000], InstitutionalGaming, in «Governance», vol.13, n. 4, pp. 523-533.

GOODSELL, C.T. [1990], EmergingIssues in Public Administration,in Lynn e Wildavsky [1990, 495-509].

GORMLEY , W.T. e PETERS , B.G.[1992], National Styles of Regu-lation: Child Care in ThreeCountries, in «Policy Sciences»,vol. 25, n. 4, pp. 381-399.

GRABER, D. [1988], Processing theNews, New York, Longman.

GRAHAM, G.J. [1988], «The PolicyOrientation» and the TheoreticalDevelopment of Political Science,in E.B. Portis e M.B. Levy (acura di), Handbook of PoliticalTheory and Policy Science, We-stport, Conn., Greenwood Press,pp. 149-161.

GRAZIANO, L. [1995], Lobbying, plu-ralismo, democrazia, Roma, LaNuova Italia Scientifica.

GREEN, D.P. e SHAPIRO, I. [1994],Pathologies of Rational ChoiceTheory: A Critique of Applica-tions in Political Science, NewHaven, Conn., Yale UniversityPress.

— [1995], Teoria della scelta razio-nale e scienza politica: un incon-tro con pochi frutti?, in «Rivistaitaliana di scienza politica», vol.25, n. 1, pp. 51-89.

GREENBERG, G., MILLER, J., MOHR,L. e VLADECK, B.C. [1977], De-veloping Public Policy Theory:Perspectives from Empirical Rese-arch, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 71, n. 4,pp. 1532-1543.

GREENSTEIN, F.I. e POLSBY, N.W. (acura di) [1975], Handbook ofPolitical Science. Policies and Po-licymaking, Reading, Mass., Ad-dison-Wesley, pp. 439-473.

GREGG, P.N. [1974], Units and Le-vels of Analysis: A Problem ofPolicy Analysis in Federal Sy-stems, in «Publius», vol. 4, n. 4,pp. 59-86.

GREMION, P. [1976], Le pouvoir péri-phérique. Bureaucrates et notablesdans le système politique français,Paris, Seuil.

GRIFFITH, E.F. [1939], The Impasseof Democracy, New York, Harri-son-Hilton.

GROFMAN, B. (a cura di) [1995], In-formation, Participation , andChoice, Ann Arbor, University ofMichigan Press.

GROSSMAN , L.K. [1995] , TheElectronic Republic: ReshapingDemocracy in the InformationAge, New York, Viking.

GRUMM, J.G. [1975], The Analysis ofPolicy Impact, in Greenstein ePolsby [1975, 439-473].

GUARNIER I, C. e PEDERZOLI, P.[1997], La democrazia giudizia-ria, Bologna, Il Mulino.

GUNNELL, J.G. [1976], Social Scienti-fic Knowledge and Policy Deci-sions: A Critique of the Intellec-tualist Model, in P.N. Gregg (acura di), Problems of Theory inPolicy Analysis, Lexington,Mass., Heath, pp. 29-38.


— [1995], The Declination of the«State» and the Origins of Ame-rican Pluralism, in J. Farr, J.S.Dryzek e S.T. Leonard (a curadi), Political Science in History,Cambridge, Mass., CambridgeUniversity Press, pp. 19-40.

GUSTAFSSON , G. [1983], Symbolicand Pseudo Policies as Responsesto Diffusion of Power, in «PolicySciences», vol. 15, n. 3, pp. 269-287.

GUVENIR, A.H. e AKMAR, V. [1992],Problem Representation for Refi-nement, in «Minds and Machi-nes», vol. 2, n. 3, pp. 267-282.

HAAS, E.B. [1990], When Knowled-ge Is Power, Berkeley, Universityof California Press.

HAAS, P.M. [1992], Epistemic Commu-nities and International Policy Co-ordination, in «International Orga-nization», vol. 46, n. 1, pp. 1-35.

HABERMAS, J. [1969], Strukturwandelder Öffentlichkeit, Berlin, Luch-terhand; trad. it. Storia e criticadell’opinione pubblica, Bari, La-terza, 1971.

HALL, P.A. [1986], Governing theEconomy: The Politics of StateIntervention in Britain and Fran-ce, Cambridge, Polity.

— (a cura di) [1989], The PoliticalPower of Economic Ideas, Prince-ton, N.J., Princeton UniversityPress.

HAMBURGER, H. [1979], Games asModels of Social Phenomena, SanFrancisco, Calif., Freeman.

HAMM, K. [1986], The Role of Sub-governments in U.S. State Policy-making, in «Legislative StudiesQuarterly», vol. 11, n. 3, pp.321-351.

HANCOCK, D.M. [1983], Comparati-ve Public Policy: An Assessment,in W.A. Finifter (a cura di), Po-litical Science: The State of the

Discipline, Washington, D.C.,American Political Science Asso-ciation, pp. 283-308.

HANF, K. [1978], Introduction , inHanf e Scharpf [1978, 1-15].

HANF, K. e SCHARPF, F.W. (a curadi) [1978], InterorganizationalPolicy Making. Limits to Coordi-nation and Central Control, Lon-don-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.

HANSEN, S.B. [1983], Public PolicyAnalysis: Some Recent Develop-ments and Current Problems, inA.W. Finifter (a cura di), Politi-cal Science: The State of the Di-scipline , Washington , D.C.,American Political Science Asso-ciation, pp. 217-245.

HARDIN, G. [1968], The Tragedy ofthe Commons, in «Science», n.162, pp. 1243-1248.

HARGROVE, E.C. [1975], The MissingLink: The Study of the Implemen-tation of Social Policy, Washin-gton, D.C., Urban Institute.

HARGROVE, E.C. e GLIDEWELL, J.G.[1990], Impossible Jobs in PublicManagement, Lawrence, Univer-sity Press of Kansas.

HARSANYI, J.C. [1977a], Advances inUnderstanding Rational Behavior,in R.E. Butts e J. Hintikka (acura di), Foundational Problemsin the Special Science, Dordrecht,Reidel, pp. 315-343.

— [1977b], Rational Behavior andBargaining Equilibrium in Gamesand Social Situations, Cambridge,Mass., Cambridge UniversityPress; trad. it. Comportamentorazionale ed equilibrio di contrat-tazione, Milano, Il Saggiatore,1985.

HAVEMAN , R.H. [1976] , PolicyAnalysis and the Congress: AnEconomist’s View , in «PolicyAnalysis», vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 235-250.

HAVEMAN, R.H. e MARGOLIS, J. (a


cura di) [19772], Public Expendi-ture and Policy Analysis, Chica-go, Ill., Rand McNally.

HAVENS, H.S. [1992], The Evolutionof the General Accounting Office:From Vouchers Audits to Pro-gram Evaluation, in Weiss [1992,201-217].

HAWKESWORTH, M.E. [1988], Theo-retical Issues in Policy Analysis,Albany, State University of NewYork Press.

HAWKINS, K. (a cura di) [1992], TheUses of Discretion, Oxford, Cla-rendon Press.

HAYEK, F. VON [1945], The Use ofKnowledge in Society, in «Ameri-can Economic Review», vol. 35,n. 4, pp. 519-530; trad. it. in F.von Hayek, Conoscenza, mercato,pianificazione, Bologna, Il Muli-no, 1988, pp. 277-292.

— [1952], Scientism and the Studyof Society, in The Counter-Revo-lution of Science. Studies on theAbuse of Reason , New York,The Free Press; trad. it. in F.von Hayek, Conoscenza, mercato,pianificazione, pp. 97-210.

— [1982], Law, Legislation and Li-berty: A New Statement of theLiberal Principles of Justice andPolitical Economy, London, Rou-tledge & Kegan Paul; trad. it.Legge, legislazione, libertà, Mila-no, Il Saggiatore, 1989.

HAYWARD , J. e KLEIN, R. [1994],Gran Bretagne: de la gestion pu-blique à la gestion privée du dé-clin économique, in Jobert [1994,83-121].

HAYWARD, J. e WATSON, M. (a curadi) [1975], Planning, Politics andPublic Policy: The British, Frenchand Italian Experience, Cambrid-ge, Cambridge University Press.

HEATWOLE, C.G., KELLER, L.F. eWAMSLEY, G.L. [1976], ActionResearch and Public Policy

Analysis: Sharpening the PoliticalPerspectives of Public Policy Re-search, in «Western PoliticalQuarterly», vol. 29, n. 4, pp.597-609.

HECLO, H. [1972], Review Article:Policy Analysis, in «British Jour-nal of Political Science», vol. 2,n. 1, pp. 83-108.

— [1974], Modern Social Politics inBritain and Sweden, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

— [1975], Frontiers of Social Policyin Europe and America, in «Poli-cy Sciences», vol. 6, n. 4, pp.407-419.

— [1978], Issue Networks and theExecutive Branch, in A.S. King(a cura di), The New AmericanPolitical System, Washington,D.C., American Enterprise Insti-tute, pp. 87-124.

HECLO, H. e WILDAVSKY, A. [1974],The Private Government of Pu-blic Money. Community and Po-licy inside British Politics, Lon-don, Macmillan.

HEIDENHEIMER, A.J. [1985], Compa-rative Public Policy at the Cros-sroads, in «Journal of Public Po-licy», vol. 5, n. 4, pp. 441-465.

HEIDENHEIMER , A.J., HECLO, H. eADAMS, T.C. [1983], Comparati-ve Public Policy. The Politics ofSocia l Choice in Europe andAmerica, New York, St. Martin’s(I ed. 1975).

HEINEMAN, R.A., BLUHM, W.T., PE-TERSON, S.A. e KEARNY, E.N.[1990], The World of the PolicyAnalyst. Rationality, Values andPolitics, Chatham, ChathamHouse.

HEINZ, J., LAUMANN, E., NELSON, R.e SALISBURY, R. [1993], The Hol-low Core: Private Interests inNational Policy Making, Cambri-dge, Mass., Harvard UniversityPress.


HELLER, W. [1966], New Dimen-sions of Political Economy, Cam-bridge, Mass., Harvard Universi-ty Press; trad. it. Nuove dimen-sioni dell’economia politica, Tori-no, Einaudi, 1968.

HELMS, J.L. [1983], Modern PublicFinance: The Neoclassical Appro-ach, in L.L. Wade (a cura di),Political Economy: Recent Views,Boston, Mass., Nijhoff, pp. 27-67.

HEMPEL, C.G. [1959], The Logic ofFunctional Analysis, in AA.VV.,Symposium on Sociological The-ory, New York, Harper andRow.

HENRY, N.L. [1990], Root and Bran-ch: Public Administration’s Tra-vel Toward the Future, in Lynn eWildavsky [1990, 3-26].

HIBBS, D.A. [1977], Political Partiesand Macroeconomi c Policy, in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 71, n. 3, pp. 1467-1487.

HICKS, J.R. [1940], The Valuation ofthe Social Income, in «Economi-ca», vol. 7, n. 26, pp. 105-124.

HILL, K.Q. [1997], In Search of Poli-cy Theory, in «Policy Currents»,vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 1-9.

HIRSCHMAN, A.O. [1970], Exit, Voiceand Loyalty, Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press; trad.it. Lealtà, defezione, protesta, Mi-lano, Bompiani, 1982.

— [1991], The Rhetoric of Reaction,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Uni-versity Press.

HJELMSLEV, L. [1961], Prolegomenato a Theory of Language, Madi-son, University of WisconsinPress; trad. it. I fondamenti dellateoria del linguaggio, Torino, Ei-naudi, 1968.

HJERN, B. e HULL, C. (a cura di)[1982], Implementation BeyondHierarchy, in «European Journal

of Political Research», vol. 10, n.2, pp. 105-198.

HJERN, B. e PORTER, D.O. [1981],Implementatio n Structures : ANew Unit of AdministrativeAnalysis, in «Organization Stu-dies», vol. 2, n. 3, pp. 211-227.

HOFFERBERT, R.I. [1966], The Rela-tion between Public Policy andSome Structural and Environmen-tal Variables in the American Sta-tes, in «American Political Scien-ce Review», vol. 60, n. 1, pp. 73-82.

HOFFERBERT, R.I. e CINGRANELLI,D.L. [1996], Public Policy andAdministration: Comparative po-licy Analysis, in R.E. Goodin eH.-D. Klingemann (a cura di), ANew Handbook of PoliticalScience, Oxford, Oxford Univer-sity Press, pp. 593-609.

HOFMANN, J. [1995], Implicit Theo-ries in Policy Discourse: An In-quiry into the Interpretations ofReality in German TechnologyPolicy, in «Policy Sciences», vol.28, n. 2, pp. 127-148.

HOGWOOD , B.W. [1984] , PolicyAnalysis: The Dangers of Over-sophistication, in «Public Admi-nistration Bulletin», vol. 44, pp.19-28.

HOGWOOD, B.W. e PETERS, B.G.[1983] , Policy Dynamics , Bri-ghton, Wheatsheaf Books.

HOLLAND, J.H. [1995], Hidden Or-der. How Adaptation BuildsComplexity, Reading, Mass., Ad-dison-Wesley.

HOLLER, M.J. [1982], An Introduc-tion to the Analysis of Power,Voting, and Voting Power, inM.J. Holler (a cura di), Power,Voting, and Voting Power, Wür-zburg, Physica, pp. 15-30.

HOLMSTROM, B. [1982], Moral Ha-zard in Teams, in «Bell Journalof Economics», vol. 13, n. 2, pp.324-340.


HOLMSTRO M, B. e MILGROM, P.[1991] , Muli-Task Principal -Agent Analysis, in «Journal ofLaw, Economics, and Organiza-tion», vol. 7, n.s., pp. 24-52.

HOOD, C.C. [1976], The Limits ofAdministration, London, Wiley.

HOOD, C.C. e SCOTT, C. [1996], Bu-reaucratic Regulation and NewPublic Management in the Uni-ted Kingdom: Mirror-Image De-velopments?, in «Journal of Lawand Society», vol. 23, n. 3, pp.321-345.

HUNTINGTON, S.P. [1974], Paradigmsof American Politics: Beyond theOne, the Two and the Many, in«Political Science Quarterly»,vol. 89, n. 1, pp. 1-26.

— [1981], American Politics andthe Promise of Disharmony,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Uni-versity Press.

INGRA M , H. e SCHNEIDER , A.L.[1995], Social Construction: Re-sponse in Controversy, in «Ame-rican Political Science Review»,vol. 89, n. 2, pp. 441-446.

ISFOL-CEE [1993], La valutazione nelFondo sociale europeo. Metodolo-gia di valutazione ex post dei pro-grammi operativi, Milano, Angeli.

JACKSO N , D. e TATE , N. [1992],Comparative Judicial Review andPublic Policy, Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.

JACOBS, L.R. e SHAPIRO, R.Y. [1994],Studying Substantive Democracy,in «PS: Political Science and Po-litics», vol. 27, n. 1, pp. 9-17.

JAMES, W. [1907], Pragmatism, Cam-bridge, Mass., Harvard Universi-ty Press.

JENNINGS, B. [1987], Interpretationand Practice of Policy Analysis, inF. Fischer e J. Forester (a curadi), Confronting Values in Policy

Analysis. The Politics of Criteria,Newbury Park, Calif., Sage, pp.128-152.

JENSEN, M.C. e MECKLING, W.H.[1976], Theory of the Firm: Ma-nagerial Behaviour, Agency Costs,and Ownership Structure, in«Journal of Financial Economi-cs», vol. 3, n. 4, pp. 305-360.

JOBERT, B. [1992], Représentationssociales controverses et débatsdans la conduite des politiquespubliques, in «Revue Françaisede Science Politique», vol. 42, n.2, pp. 219-234.

— (a cura di) [1994], Le tournantnéo-liberal en Europe, Paris,L’Harmattan.

JONES, B.D. [1988], Theory and Datain Policy Analysis: Some Lessonsfrom the Study of Urban Politics,in E.B. Portis e M.B. Levy (acura di), Handbook of PoliticalTheory and Policy Science, We-stport, Conn., Greenwood Press,pp. 163-176.

— [1994], Reconceiving Decision-making in Democratic Politics:Attention, Choice, and PublicPolicy, Chicago, Ill., Universityof Chicago Press.

JORDAN, G. [1981], Iron Triangles,Woolly Corporatism and ElasticNets: Images of the Policy Pro-cess, in «Journal of Public Poli-cy», vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 95-123.

— [1982] , The Moray FirthWorking Party: «Performance»Without «Conformance», in «Eu-ropean Journal of Political Rese-arch», vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 117-129.

— [1990a], The Pluralism of Plura-lism: An Anti-Theory?, in «Poli-tical Studies», vol. 38, n. 2, pp.286-301; rist. in J.J. Richardson(a cura di), Pressure Groups,Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, 1993, pp. 49-68.

— [1990b], Sub-Governments, Poli-


cy Communities and Networks:Refilling the Old Bottles?, in«Journal of Theoretical Politics»,vol. 2, n. 3, pp. 319-338.

— [1990c], Policy Community Rea-lism versus «New» Institutiona-list Ambiguity, in «Political Stu-dies», vol. 38, n. 3, pp. 470-484.

JORDAN, G. e SCHUBERT, K. [1992],A Preliminary Ordering of PolicyNetwork Labels, in «EuropeanJournal of Political Research»,vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 117-129.

KALDOR, N. [1939], Welfare Proposi-tions of Economics and Interper-sonal Comparisons of Utility, in«Economic Journal», vol. 49, n.195, pp. 549-552.

KAPLAN, A. [1964], The Conduct ofInquiry: Methodology for Beha-vioral Science, San Francisco,Calif., Chandler.

KATZ, R.S. [1986], Party Govern-ment: A Rationalistic Conception,in Castles e Wildenmann [1986,31-71].

— [1987a], Party Government andIts Alternatives, in Katz [1987,1-26].

— (a cura di) [1987b], Party Gover-nments: European and AmericanExperiences, Berlin-New York,De Gruyter.

KAUFMAN, H. [1960], The ForestRanger, Baltimore, Md., JohnsHopkins University Press.

— [1976], Are Government Organi-zations Immortal?, Washington,D.C., The Brookings Institution.

— [1977], Reflections on Admini-strative Reorganization, in J.A.Pechman (a cura di), Setting Na-tional Priorities: The 1978 Bud-get, Washington , D.C. , TheBrookings Institution.

— [1981], Fear of Bureaucracy. ARaging Pandemic, in «PublicAdministration Review», vol. 41,n. 1, pp. 1-9.

KAUFMAN-OSBORN , T.V. [1985],Pragmatism, Policy Science, andthe State, in «American Journalof Political Science», vol. 29, n.4, pp. 827-849.

KELLOW, A. [1988], Promoting Ele-gance in Policy Theory: Simpli-fying Lowi’s Arenas of Power, in«Policy Studies Journal», vol. 16,n. 4, pp. 713-728.

KELMAN, M. [1988], On Democracy-Bashing: A Skeptical Look at theTheoretical and «Empirical» Prac-tice of the Public Choice Move-ment, in «Virginia Law Review»,vol. 74, pp. 199-273.

KELMAN, S. [1987], Using Implemen-tation Research to Solve Imple-mentation Problems, in R.C. Rist(a cura di), Policy Studies ReviewAnnual, New Brunswick, N.J.,Transaction, vol. 8, pp. 72-89.

KENIS, P. e SCHNEIDER, V. [1991],Policy Networks and PolicyAnalysis: Scrutinizing a NewAnalytical Toolbox, in Marin eMayntz [1991, 25-59].

KETTL, D.F. [1993], Sharing Power:Public Governance and PrivateMarkets, Washington, D.C., TheBrookings Institution.

— [1997], The Global Revolution inPublic Management: Driving The-mes, Missing Links, in «Journalof Policy Analysis and Manage-ment», vol. 16, n. 3, pp. 446-462.

KEY, V.O. [1961], Public Opinionand American Democracy, NewYork, Knopf.

— [19645], Politics, Parties, andPressure Groups, New York,Crowell.

KING, D.C. [1997], Turf Wars: HowCongressional Committees ClaimJurisdiction, Chicago, Ill., Uni-versity of Chicago Press.

KING, G., KEOHANE, R.O. e VERBA,S. [1994], Designing Social Inqui-ry, Princeton, N.J., PrincetonUniversity Press.


KINGDON, J.W. [1984], Agendas, Al-ternatives and Public Policy, Bo-ston, Mass., Little, Brown.

KIRCHHEIMER, O. [1957], The Va-ning of Opposition in Parliamen-tary Regimes, in «Social Resear-ch», vol. 24, n. 2, pp. 127-156.

KLINGEMANN, H.-D., HOFFERBERT,R.I. e BUDGE, I. [1994], Parties,Policy, and Democracy, Boulder,Colo., Westview Press.

KNOTT, J.H. e MILLER, G.J. [1987],Reforming Bureaucracy: The Poli-tics of Institutional Choice, En-glewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

KOLLMAN, K. [1998], Outside Lob-bying: Public Opinion and Inte-rest Group Strategies, Princeton,N.J., Princeton University Press.

KORPI, W. [1983], The DemocraticClass Struggle, London, Routled-ge & Kegan Paul.

KRAUSE, G.A. [1999], A Two-WayStreet: The Institutional Dynami-cs of the Modern AdministrativeState, Pittsburgh, Pa., Universityof Pittsburgh Press.

KREHBIEL, K. [1991], Informationand Legislative Organization,Ann Arbor, University of Michi-gan Press.

— [1997], Restrictive Rules Reconsi-dered, in «American Journal ofPolitical Science», vol. 41, n. 3,pp. 919-944.

— [1998], Pivotal Politics: A Theoryof US Lawmaking, Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press.

KREHBIEL, K. e RIVERS, D. [1990],Sophisticated Voting in Congress:A Reconsideration, in «Journal ofPolitics», vol. 52, n. 2, pp. 548-578.

KREPS, D.M. [1990], Corporate Cul-ture and Economic Theory , inJ.E. Alt e K.A Shepsle (a curadi), Perspectives on Positive Poli-tical Economy, New York, Cam-

bridge University Press, pp. 90-143.

KREPS, D.M. e WILSON, R. [1982],Reputation and Imperfect Infor-mation, in «Journal of EconomicTheory», vol. 27, n. 2, pp. 253-279.

KRUEGER, A.O. [1974], The PoliticalEconomy of the Rent-Seeking So-ciety, in «American Economic Re-view», vol. 64, n. 3, pp. 291-303.

KUHN, T.S. [1970], The Structure ofScientific Revolutions, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press(I ed. 1962); trad. it. La strutturadelle rivoluzioni scientifiche, To-rino, Einaudi, 1978.

LAFFONT, J.-J. e TIROLE, J. [1993], ATheory of Incentives in Procure-ment and Regulation, Cambrid-ge, Mass., The MIT Press.

LAKATOS, I. [1970], Falsification andthe Methodology of Scientific Re-search Programmes, in I. Lakatose A. Musgrave (a cura di), Criti-cism and the Growth of Knowle-dge, Cambridge , CambridgeUniversity Press; trad. it. La fal-sificazione e la metodologia deiprogrammi di ricerca scientifici, inI. Lakatos e A. Musgrave (a curadi), Critica e crescita della cono-scenza, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1976,pp. 164-267.

LAKOFF, G. e JOHNSON, M. [1980],Metaphors We Live by, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

LALMAN , D., OPPENHEIME R , J. eSWISTAK, P. [1993], Formal Ra-tional Choice Theory: A Cumula-tive Science of Politics, in A.W.Finifter (a cura di), PoliticalScience: The State of the Discipline,Washington , D.C., AmericanPolitical Science Association,vol. II, pp. 77-104.

LANDAU, M. [1973], On the Conceptof a Self-Correcting Organization,


in «Public Administration Re-view», vol. 33, n. 6, pp. 533-542.

— [1988], Foreword, in E.B. Portise M.B. Levy (a cura di), Han-dbook of Political Theory andPolicy Science, Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press, pp. vii-xii.

LANDIS, J.M. [1966], The Admini-strative Process , New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

LANE, E. [1964], Lobbying and theLaw, Berkeley, University of Ca-lifornia Press.

LANE, J.-E. [1990], Institutional Re-form. A Public Policy Perspective,Aldershot, Dartmouth.

— [1995], The Public Sector. Con-cepts, Models and Approaches,London, Sage.

LANGE, P. e REGINI, M. [1987], Sta-to e regolazione sociale: nuoveprospettive sul caso italiano, Bo-logna, Il Mulino.

LANZALACO , L. [1995], Istituzioni,organizzazioni, potere, Roma, LaNuova Italia Scientifica.

LANZARA, G.F. [1993], Capacità ne-gativa, Bologna, Il Mulino.

LA PALOMBARA, J. [1964], InterestGroups in Italian Politics, Prince-ton, N.J., Princeton UniversityPress.

— [1987], Dipendenze e interdipen-denze nello sviluppo della scienzapolitica italiana, in L. Graziano(a cura di), La scienza politica inItalia. Bilancio e prospettive, pp.61-89.

LAPORTE, T.R. [1996], Shifting Van-tage and Conceptual Puzzles inUnderstanding Public Organiza-tion Networks , in «Journal ofPublic Administration Researchand Theory», vol. 6, n. 1, pp.49-74.

LA SPINA, A. e MAJONE, G. [2000],Lo Stato regolatore, Bologna, IlMulino.

LASSWELL, H.D. [1930], Psychopa-

thology and Politics, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

— [1936], Politics: Who Gets What,When, How, New York, Mc-Graw-Hill; trad. it. La politica.Chi prende che cosa, quando,come, in Potere, politica e perso-nalità, Torino, UTET, 1975.

— [1951], The Policy Orientation, inLerner e Lasswell [1951, 3-15].

— [1956], The Decision Process: Se-ven Categories of FunctionalAnalysis, College Park, Universi-ty of Maryland, Bureau of Go-vernmental Research.

— [1963], The Future of PoliticalScience, New York, AthertonPress.

— [1971] , A Pre-View of PolicySciences, New York, Elsevier.

LASSWELL, H.D. e KAPLAN , A.[1950], Power and Society, NewHaven, Conn., Yale UniversityPress; trad. it. Potere e società,Milano, Etas Kompass, 1969 (IIed. Bologna, Il Mulino, 1997).

LASZLO, E. [1972], Introductionto

Systems Philosophy, New York,Gordon and Breach.

LASZLO, E. e LASZLO, C. [1997], TheInsight Edge: An Introduction tothe Theory and Practice of Evolu-tionary Management, Westport,Conn., Quorum Books.

LATOUR, B. e WOOLGAR, S. [1979],Laboratory Life: The Construc-tion of Scientific Facts, London-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.

LAUDAN, L. [1977], Progress and ItsProblems: Toward a Theory ofScientific Growth, London, Rou-tledge & Kegan Paul; trad. it. Ilprogresso scientifico: prospettiveper una teoria, Roma, Armando,1979.

LAUMAN N , E.O. e KNOKE, D.[1987], The Organizational State:Social Choice in National PolicyDomains, Madison, University ofWisconsin Press.


LAVER, M.J. e SCHOFIELD, N. [1990],Multiparty Government: The Po-litics of Coalition Formation inEurope, Oxford, Oxford Univer-sity Press.

LAVER, M.J. e SHEPSLE, K.A. (a curadi) [1994], Cabinet Ministers andParliamentar y Governmen t ,Cambridge, Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

— [1996], Making and BreakingGovernments, New York, Cam-bridge University Press.

LAVINE, T.Z. [1995], The Process ofGovernment , in «Society», vol.32, pp. 48-55.

LEECH, D. [1992], Empirical Analy-sis of the Distribution of A PrioriVoting Power, in «EuropeanJournal of Political Research»,vol. 21, n. 3, pp. 245-265.

LEHMBRUCH, G. [1979], Liberal Cor-poratism and Party Government,in P.C. Schmitter e G. Lehm-bruch (a cura di), Trends towardsCorporatist Intermediation, Lon-don-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage,pp. 2-36; trad. it. Il neocorporati-vismo in una prospettiva compa-rata, in G. Lehmbruch e P.C.Schmitter, La politica degli inte-ressi nei paesi industrializzati ,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1982, pp. 7-40.

— [1982], Introduction: Neo-Corpo-ratism in Comparative Perspecti-ve, in Lehmbruch e Schmitter[1982, 2-6].

LEHMBRUCH, G. e SCHMITTER, P.C.(a cura di) [1982], Patterns ofCorporatist Policy-Making, Lon-don-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.

LEHNER , F. e KEMAN , H. [1984],Political-Economic Interdepen-dence and the Management ofEconomic Crisis, in «EuropeanJournal of Political Research»,vol. 12, n. 2, pp. 213-220.

LEHNER, F. e SCHUBERT, K. [1984],

Party Government and the Politi-cal Control of Public Policy, in«European Journal of PoliticalResearch», vol. 12, n. 2, pp. 131-146.

LEICHTER, H.M. [1979], A Compara-tive Approach to Policy Analysis:Health Care Policy in Four Na-tions, Cambridge , CambridgeUniversity Press.

LEISERSON, A. [1942], AdministrativeRegulation: A Study in Represen-tation of Interests, Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press.

LEMAN, C. [1980], The Collapse ofWelfare Reform: Political Institu-tions, Policy and Poor in Canadaand the United States, Cambrid-ge, Mass., The MIT Press.

LEONARD, S.T. [1995], The Pedagogi-cal Purposes of a Political Science,in J. Farr, J.S. Dryzek e S.T. Le-onard (a cura di), Political Sciencein History , Cambridge , Cam-bridge University Press, pp. 66-98.

LERNER, D. e LASSWELL, H.D. (acura di) [1951] , The PolicySciences: Recent Developments inScope and Method, Stanford, Ca-lif., Stanford University Press.

LEVINE, D.N. [1985], The Flightfrom Ambiguity , Chicago, Ill.,University of Chicago Press.

LEWIS, E. [1980], Public Entrepre-neurship: Toward a Theory ofBureaucrati c Political Power ,Bloomington, Indiana UniversityPress.

LIEBOWITZ, S.J. e MARGOLIS, S.E.[1995], Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History, in «Journal ofLaw, Economics, and Organiza-tion», vol. 11, n. 1, pp. 205-226.

LIGHT, P.C. [1982], The President’sAgenda: Domestic Policy Choicefrom Kennedy to Carter, Balti-more, Md., Johns Hopkins Uni-versity Press.


— [1995], Thickening Government:Federal Hierarchy and the Diffu-sion of Accountability, Washin-gton, D.C., The Brookings Insti-tution.

— [1999], The True Size of Govern-ment, Washington, D.C., TheBrookings Institution.

LIJPHART, A. [1968], Typologies ofDemocratic Systems, in «Compa-rative Political Studies», vol. 1,pp. 3-44.

LIJPHART, A. e GROFMAN, B. [1984],Choosing an Electoral System: Is-sues and Alternatives, NewYork, Praeger.

LINDBLOM, C.E. [1959], The Scienceof «Muddling Through», in «Pu-blic Administration Review»,vol. 19, n. 1, pp. 79-88; trad. it.La scienza del «sapersela cavare»,in I.H. Ansoff (a cura di), Lastrategia d’impresa, Milano, An-geli, 1974, pp. 29-42.

— [1965], The Intelligence of De-mocracy: Decision-making throu-gh Mutual Adjustmen t, NewYork, The Free Press.

— [1977] , Politics and Markets ,New York, Basic Books; trad. it.Politica e mercato, Milano, EtasLibri, 1979.

— [1979], Still Muddling, not yetthrough, in «Public Administra-tion Review», vol. 39, n. 6, pp.517-526.

— [1980], The Policy-making Pro-cess , Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall (I ed. 1968).

— [1990], Inquiry and Change: TheTroubled Attempt to Understandand Shape Society, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

LINDER, S.H. e PETERS, B.G. [1987],A Design Perspective on PolicyImplementation: The Fallacies ofMisplaced Prescription, in «PolicyStudies Review», vol. 6, n. 3, pp.459-475.

LIPPMANN, W. [1922], Public Opi-nion, New York, Harcourt Bra-ce; trad. it. L’opinione pubblica,Roma, Donzelli, 2000.

— [1925] , The Phantom Public ,New York, Harcourt Brace.

LIPSET, S.M. [1969] (a cura di), Poli-tics and the Social Sciences, NewYork, Oxford University Press.

— [1996], American Exceptionali-sm: A Double-edged Sword, NewYork, Norton.

LIPSET, S.M. e ROKKAN, S. (a curadi) [1968], Party Systems andVoter Alignments, New York,The Free Press.

LIPSKY, M. [1980], Street-level Bure-aucracy: Dilemmas of the Indivi-dual in Public Services, NewYork, Russell Sage Foundation.

LITTLE, I.M.D. e MIRRLEES, J.A.[1968] , Manual of IndustrialProject Analysis, Paris, OECD,vol. 2.

LOHMANN, S. [1998], An Informa-tion Rationale for the Power ofSpecial Interests, in «AmericanPolitical Science Review», vol.92, n. 4, pp. 809-828.

LONG, N. [1954], Public Policy andAdministration: The Goals ofRationality and Responsability, in«Public Administration Review»,vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 22-31.

LORENZINI, S. [1995], L’attraversa-mento di Firenze dell’Alta veloci-tà ferroviaria: un’analisi multicri-terio, in «Economia pubblica»,vol. 25, n. 5, pp. 77-112.

LOWI, T.J. [1964], American Busi-ness, Public Policy, Case Studiesand Political Theory, in «WorldPolitics», vol. 16, n. 4, pp. 677-715; trad. it. Politiche pubbliche,«case studies» e teoria politica, inT.J. Lowi, La scienza delle politi-che, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1999,pp. 5-36.

— [1969], The End of Liberalism,New York, Norton.


— [1970], Decision Making vs. Poli-cy Making: Toward an Antidotefor Technocracy, in «Public Ad-ministration Review», vol. 30, n.3, pp. 314-325.

— [1971a], The Politics of Disorder,New York, Basic Books.

— [1971b], Parallels of Policy andPolitics. The Political Theory inAmerican History, relazione;trad. it. La teoria politica nellastoria americana, in T.J. Lowi, Lascienza delle politiche, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1999, pp. 59-95.

— [1972], Four Systems of Policy,Politics, and Choice, in «PublicAdministration Review», vol. 32,n. 4, pp. 298-310; trad. it. Politi-ca e politiche: quattro sistemi direlazioni, in T.J. Lowi, La scienzadelle politiche, Bologna, Il Muli-no, 1999, pp. 37-58.

— [1975], What Political ScientistsDon’t Need to Ask About PolicyAnalysis, rist. in S.S. Nagel (acura di), Policy Studies and theSocial Sciences, Lexington, Mass.,Lexington Books, 1979, pp. 267-273.

— [1976], American Government.Incomplete Conquest, Hillsdale,N.J., The Dryden Press.

— [1984], Why Is There No Sociali-sm in the United States? A Fede-ralist Analysis, in R.T. Golem-biewski e A. Wildavsky (a curadi), The Costs of Federalis m,New Brunswick, N.J., Transac-tion, pp. 37-53; trad. it. Perchénon c’è il socialismo in America?Un’analis i federalista , in T.J.Lowi, La scienza delle politiche,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1999, pp.99-119.

— [1985], The State in Politics: TheRelation Between Policy and Ad-ministration, in R.G. Noll (acura di), Regulatory Policy andSocial Sciences , Berkeley, Uni-

versity of California Press, pp.67-105; trad. it.: Lo stato in poli-tica. I rapporti tra politiche e am-ministrazione, in T.J. Lowi, Lascienza delle politiche, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1999, pp. 227-254.

— [1988], An Assessment of Kel-low’s Promoting Elegance in Po-licy Theory, in «Policy StudiesJournal», vol. 16, n. 4, pp. 725-728.

— [1991], I gruppi e lo Stato, in«Teoria Politica», vol. 7, n. 1,pp. 3-30; rist. in T.J. Lowi, Lascienza delle politiche, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1999, pp. 291-323.

— [1992], The State in PoliticalScience: How We Became WhatWe Study, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 86, n. 1,pp. 1-7.

— [1993], A Review of Herbert Si-mon’s Review of My View of theDiscipline, in «PS : PoliticalScience and Politics», vol. 26, n.1, pp. 51-52.

LUPIA, A. e MCCUBBINS , M.D.[1998], The Democratic Dilem-ma: Can Citizens Learn WhatThey Really Need to Know?,New York, Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

— [2000], When is Delegation Ab-dication: How Citizens Use Insti-tutions to Make Their AgentsAccountable, in «European Jour-nal of Political Research», vol.37, n. 3, pp. 291-307.

LUPIA, A., MCCUBBINS , M.D. ePOPKIN, S.L. (a cura di) [2000],Elements of Reason: Cognition,Choice and the Bounds of Ratio-nality, New York, CambridgeUniversity Press.

LUSTICK, I.S. [1997], The Disciplineof Political Science: Studying theCulture of Rational Choice as aCase in Point, in «PS: PoliticalScience and Politics», vol. 30, n.2, pp. 175-179.


LYNN, L.E. JR. [1981], Managing thePublic’s Business: The Job of theGovernmen t Executive, NewYork, Basic Books.

— [1987], Managing Public Policy,Boston, Mass., Little, Brown.

LYNN , N.B. [1983] , Self-Portrait:Profile of Political Scientists, inA.W. Finifter (a cura di), Politi-cal Science: The State of the Di-scipline, Washington , D.C.,American Political Science Asso-ciation, pp. 95-123.

LYNN, N.B. e WILDAVSKY, A. (a curadi) [1990], Public Administra-tion. The State of the Discipline,Chatham, Chatham House.

MACHIN, H. e WRIGHT, V. [1984],Economic Policy and Policy -making under the Mitterand Pre-sidency, London, Pinter.

MAIER, C. [1975], Recasting Bourgeo-is Europe: Stabilization in France,Germany, Italy in the Decade af-ter World War I, Princeton,N.J., Princeton University Press;trad. it. La rifondazione dell’Eu-ropa Borghese. Francia, Germaniae Italia nel decennio successivoalla prima guerra mondiale, Bari,De Donato, 1979.

MAJONE, G. [1975], On the Notionof Political Feasibility, in «Euro-pean Journal of Political Resear-ch», vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 259-274.

— [1978] , The Uses of PolicyAnalysis; rist. in B. Raven (acura di), Policy Studies ReviewAnnual, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage, 1980, vol. 4, pp.161-180.

— [1980], Policies as Theories, in«Omega», vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 151-162.

— [1989], Evidence, Argument andPersuasion in the Policy Process,New Haven, Conn., Yale Uni-versity Press.

— [1994], Communauté Economi-que Européenne: Déréglementa-tion ou re-réglementation? Laconduite des politiques publiquesdepuis l’Acte Unique, in Jobert[1994, 233-263].

— [1996], Which Social Policy forEurope?, in Y. Mény, P. Muller eJ.L. Quermonn e (a cura di),Adjusting to Europe, New York-London, Routledge, pp. 123-136.

MAJONE, G. e QUADE, E.S. (a curadi) [1980], Pitfalls of Analysis,New York, Wiley.

MAJONE, G. e W ILDAVSKY , A.[1979], Implementation as Evo-lution , in J.L. Pressman e A.Wildavsky (a cura di), Imple-mentation, Berkeley, Universityof California Press, pp. 163-180.

MANLEY, J.F. [1983], Neo-Pluralism:A Class Analysis of Pluralism Iand Pluralism II, in «The Ameri-can Political Science Review»,vol. 77, n. 2, pp. 368-383.

MANSFIELD, H.C. [1989], Tamingthe Prince: The Ambivalence ofModern Executive Power, NewYork, The Free Press.

MARAFFI, M. (a cura di) [1981], Lasocietà neo-corporativa, Bologna,Il Mulino.

MARANDO, V.L. e FLORESTANO, P.S.[1990], Intergovernmental Mana-gement: The State of the Discipli-ne, in Lynn e Widavsky [1990,287-317].

MARCH, J.G. [1965], (a cura di),Handbook of Organizations, Chi-cago, Ill., Rand McNally.

— [1978] , Bounded Rationality,Ambiguity, and the Engineeringof Choice , in «Bell Journal ofEconomics», vol. 9, n. 2, pp.587-608; rist. in J. Elster (a curadi), Rational Choice, New York,New York University Press,1986, pp. 142-170.

— [1994], A Primer on Decision


Making: How Decisions Happen,New York, The Free Press; trad.it. Prendere decisioni, Bologna, IlMulino, 1998.

— [1996], Continuity and Changein Theories of Organizational Ac-tion, in «Administrative ScienceQuarterly», vol. 41, n. 1, pp.278-287.

— [1997], Administrative Practice,Organization Theory and PoliticalPhilosophy, in «PS : PoliticalScience and Politics», vol. 30, n.4, pp. 689-698.

MARCH, J.G. e OLSEN, J.P. [1976],Ambiguity and Choice in Organi-zations, Bergen, Universitetsfor-laget; trad. it. parziale Scelta or-ganizzativa in condizioni di ambi-guità, in S. Zan, Logiche di azio-ne organizzativ a, Bologna , IlMulino, 1988, pp. 303-318.

— [1989], Rediscovering Institu-tions. The Organizational Basis ofPolitics, New York, The FreePress; trad. it. Riscoprire le istitu-zioni: le basi organizzative dellapolitica, Bologna, Il Mulino,1992.

— [1995], Democratic Governance,New York, The Free Press; trad.it. Governare la democrazia, Bo-logna, Il Mulino, 1997.

MARCH, J.G. e SIMON, H.A. [1958],Organizations, New York, Wiley;trad. it. Teoria dell’organizzazio-ne, Milano, Comunità, 1971.

MARCON, G. [1978], Bilancio, pro-grammazione e razionalità delledecisioni pubbliche, Milano, An-geli.

MARIN, B. e MAYNTZ, R. (a cura di)[1991], Policy Networks: Empiri-cal Evidence and TheoreticalConsiderations, Boudler, Colo.,Westview Press.

MARQUARD , O. [1981] , Abschiedvom Prinzipiellen: Philosophi-schen Studien, Stuttgart, Reclam;

trad. it. parziale Apologia delcaso. Considerazioni filosofichesull’uomo, Bologna, Il Mulino,1991.

MARRADI, A. [19843], Concetti e me-todi per la ricerca sociale, Firen-ze, La Giuntina.

MARSH, D. e RHODES, R.A.M.[1992], Policy Communities andIssue Networks: Beyond Typolo-gy, in D. Marsh e R.A.W. Rho-des (a cura di), Policy Networksin British Government, Oxford,Clarendon Press, pp. 249-268.

MARTELLI, P. [1983], La logica dellascelta collettiva: Individui razio-nali e decisioni pubbliche, Mila-no, Il Saggiatore.

— [1999] , Elezioni e democraziarappresentativa: un’introduzioneteorica, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

MARTIN, M. [1977], The Philosophi-cal Importance of the RosenthalEffect, in «Journal for the The-ory of Social Behavior», vol. 7,n. 1, pp. 81-96.

MARTIN , M. e MCINTYRE, L.C. (acura di) [1994], Readings in thePhilosophy of Socia l Science,Cambridge , Mass. , The M IT

Press.MARTIN, R.M. [1983], Pluralism and

the New Corporatism, in «Politi-cal Studies», vol. 31, n. 2, pp.86-102.

MARX, K. [1867-94], Das Kapital.Kritik der politischen Oekono-mie, Hamburg, Otto Meissner;trad. it. Il capitale, Roma, EditoriRiuniti, 1970.

MASHAW, J.L. [1983], BureaucraticJustice: Managing Social SecurityDisability Claims, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

— [1997], Greed, Chaos, & Gover-nance: Using Public Choice to Im-prove Public Law, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

MASON, R.O. e MITROFF, I.I. [1981],


Challenging Strategic PlanningAssumption: Theory Cases andTechniques, New York, Wiley.

MATHEWS, D. [1994] , Politics forPeople: Finding a ResponsiblePublic Voice, Urbana, Universityof Illinois Press.

MATLAND, R.E. [1995], Synthesizingthe Implementation Literature:The Ambiguity-Conflict Model ofPolicy Implementation, in «Jour-nal of Public Administration Re-search and Theory», vol. 5, n. 2,pp. 145-174.

MATTEUCCI, F. [1991], Manuale dicostruzione del sistema informati-vo per il controllo di gestione deiservizi comunali, in B. Dente (acura di), L’efficacia dei poteri lo-cali, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 29-245.

MAY, J.V. e WILDAVSKY, A. (a curadi) [1978], The Policy Cycle inPolitics and Public Policy, Lon-don-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.

MAYHEW, D.R. [1974], Congress:The Electoral Connection, NewHaven, Conn., Yale UniversityPress.

MAYNARD-MOODY, S., MUSHENO,M. e PALUMBO, D. [1990], Stre-et-wise Social Policy: Resolvingthe Dilemma of Street-level In-fluence and Successful Implemen-tation, in «Western PoliticalQuarterly», vol. 43, n. 4, pp.833-848.

MAYNARD-MOODY, S. e STULL, D.[1987], The Symbolic Side of Po-licy Analysis: Interpreting PolicyChange in a Health Department,in F. Fischer e J. Forester (acura di), Confronting Values inPolicy Analysis. The Politics ofCriteria, Newbury Park, Calif.,Sage, pp. 248-265.

MAYNTZ, R. [1978], Intergovernmen-tal Implementation of Environ-mental Policy, in Hanf e Scharpf[1978, 201-214].

— [1983], The Conditions of Effec-tive Public Policy: A New Chal-lenge for Policy Analysis, in «Po-licy and Politics», vol. 11, n. 2,pp. 123-143.

MAZEY, S.P. e RICHARDSON, J.J. (acura di) [1993], Lobbying in theEuropean Community, Oxford,Oxford University Press.

MAZMANIAN, D.A. e SABATIER, P.A.[1981] (a cura di), Effective Poli-cy Implementation , Lexington,Mass., Lexington Books.

— [1983], Implementation and Pu-blic Policy, Glenview, Ill., ScottForesman (II ed. 1989).

MCCAFFREY, D.P., ANDERSEN, D.F.,MCCOLD , P. e K IM, D.H.[1987] , Modeling Comlexity:Using Dynamic Simulation toLink Regression and Case Stu-dies, in R.C. Rist (a cura di), Po-licy Studies Review Annual, NewBrunswick, N.J., Transaction,pp. 35-57.

MCCALL, G.J. e WEBER, G.H.[1983], Policy Analysis AcrossAcademic Disciplines, in S.S. Na-gel (a cura di), Encyclopedia ofPolicy Studies, New York, Mar-cel Dekker, pp. 201-221.

MCCANN, M.W. [1992], Reform Liti-gation on Trial, in «Law and So-cial Inquiry», vol. 17, n. 4, pp.715-743.

MCCLOSKY, H. e ZALLER, J. [1984],The American Ethos: Public Atti-tudes Towards Capitalism andDemocracy, Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.

MCCOMBS, M.E. [1981], The Agen-da-Setting Approach, in D.D.Nimmo e K.R. Sanders (a curadi), Handbook of Political Com-munication, London-Beverly Hil-ls, Calif., Sage, pp. 121-140.

MCCORMIC K, R. e TOLLISON, R.[1981], Politicians, Legislationand the Economy: An Inquiry


into the Interest-Group Theory ofGovernment, Boston, Mass.,Nijhoff.

MCCUBBINS , M.D., NOLL, R.G. eWEINGAST, B.R. [1987], Admini-strative Procedures as Instrumen-ts of Political Control, in «Jour-nal of Law, Economics, and Or-ganization», vol. 3, n. 2, pp. 243-277.

— [1989], Structure and Process,Politics and Policy: Administrati-ve Arrangements and the Politi-cal Control of Agencies, in «Vir-ginia Law Review», vol. 75, pp.431-482.

MCGREW , A.G. e W ILSON, M.J.[1982], Decision Making: Appro-aches and Analysis, Manchester,Manchester University Press.

MCKEAN, R.N. [1964], Divergencesbetween Individual and TotalCosts within Government , in«American Economic Review»,vol. 54, n. 3, pp. 243-249.

MCKELVEY, R.D. [1976], Intransitivi-ties in Multidimensional VotingModels and Some Implicationsfor Agenda Control, in «Journalof Economic Theory», vol. 12, n.3, pp. 472-482.

— [1979], General Conditions forGlobal Intransitivities in FormalVoting Models, in «Econometri-ca», vol. 47, n. 5, pp. 1085-1112.

MCLAUGHLIN, M. [1976], Implemen-tation as Mutual Adaptation:Change in Classroom Organiza-tion, in «Teachers College Re-cord», vol. 77, n. 3, pp. 339-351.

MCLEAN, I. e URKEN, A.B. [1992],Did Jefferson or Madison Under-stand Condorcet’s Theory of So-cial Choice?, in «Public Choice»,vol. 73, n. 4, pp. 445-457.

— (a cura di) [1995], Classics ofSocial Choice, Ann Arbor, Uni-versity of Michigan Press.

MCLUHAN, M. [1964], Understan-

ding Media: The Extensions ofMan, New York, Penguin; trad.it. Gli strumenti del comunicare,Milano, Garzanti, 1977.

MCMILLAN, J. [1992], Games, Strate-gies, and Managers, Oxford,Oxford University Press.

MEAD , M. [1970] , Hunger , NewYork, Scientists’ Institute forPublic Information.

MÉNY, Y. [1983], Le maire ici et ail-leurs, Paris, PUF.

MÉNY, Y. e THOENIG, J.-C. [1989],Politiques publiques, Paris, PUF;trad. it. Le politiche pubbliche,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1991.

MERELMAN , R.M. [1981], HaroldLasswell’s Political World: WeakTea for Hard Times, in «BritishJournal of Political Science», vol.11, n. 4, pp. 471-497.

MERRIAM, C.E. [1925], New Aspectsof Politics, Chicago, Ill., Univer-sity of Chicago Press.

MERRIAM, C. [1944], Public and Pri-vate Government, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

MERTON, R.K. [1948], The Self-Ful-filling Prophecy, in «Antioch Re-view», vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 193-210.

— [19498], Social Theory and SocialStructure, Glencoe, Ill., The FreePress; trad. it. Teoria e strutturasociale, Bologna, Il Mulino,1992.

METCALFE, L. [1978] , in Hanf eScharpf [1978, 37-55].

MICHELS, R. [1909], Der Konservati-ve Grundzug der Partei-Organisa-tion, in «Monatschrift für Sozio-logie», vol. 1, pp. 228-236; trad.it. Democrazia formale e realtàoligarchica, in G. Sivini (a curadi), Sociologia dei partiti politici,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1979, pp.175-194.

M ILBRATH , L.W. [1963] , TheWashington Lobbyists, Chicago,Ill., Rand McNally.


M ILES, M.B. e HUBERMAN, M.A.[1984], Qualitative Data Analy-sis, Thousand Oaks, Calif.-Lon-don, Sage.

MILLER, G.J. [1992], Managerial Di-lemmas, Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press.

— [1997], The Impact of Economicson Contemporary Political Scien-ce, in «Journal of Economic Li-terature», vol. 35, n. 3, pp. 1173-1204.

— [2000], Rational Choice and Dy-sfunctional Institutions, in «Go-vernance», vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 535-547.

MILLER, G.J. e MOE, T.M. [1983],Bureaucrats, Legislators, and theSize of Government, in «Ameri-can Political Science Review»,vol. 77, n. 2, pp. 297-322.

MILLER, H.T. [1993], Everyday Poli-tics in Public Administration, in«American Review of PublicAdministration», vol. 23, n. 2,pp. 99-116.

M ILLE R , N.R. [1982] , Power inGame Forms , in M. Holler (acura di), Power, Voting and Vo-ting Power, Würzburg, Physica,pp. 33-51.

— [1983] , Pluralism and SocialChoice, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 77, n. 3,pp. 734-747.

— [1986], Public Choice and theTheory of Voting: A Survey, in«Annual Review of PoliticalScience», pp. 1-36.

MILLER, W. e STOKES, D. [1963],Constituency Influence in Con-gress , in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 57, n. 1,pp. 45-56.

MILWARD, B.H. [1994], NonprofitContracting and the Hollow Sta-te, in «Public AdministrationReview», vol. 54, n. 1, pp. 1-73.

MINER, R.E. e CHALICE, D.R. [1978],

Tax Reform and LegislativeBehavior, in Tullock e Wagner[1978, 61-76].

MINSKY, M.L. [1975], The Society ofMind , New York, Simon &Schuster; trad. it. La società dellamente, Milano, Adelphi, 1989.

MINTROM, M. [1997], Policy Entre-preneurs and the Diffusion of In-novation, in «American Journalof Political Science», vol. 41, n.3, pp. 738-770.

MISHAN, E.J. [1972], Cost-BenefitAnalysis , London, Allen &Unwin; trad. it. Analisi costi be-nefici, Milano, Etas Kompass,1974.

MITCHELL, W.C. [1999], PoliticalScience and Public Choice: 1950-70, in «Public Choice», vol. 98,n. 3-4, pp. 237-249.

MITNICK, B.M. [1980], The PoliticalEconomy of Regulation, NewYork, Columbia UniversityPress.

MITNICK, B.M. e BACKOFF, R.W.[1984], The Incentive Relation inImplementation, in G.C. Edwar-ds (a cura di), Public Policy Im-plementation, Greenwich, Conn.,JAI Press, pp. 59-122.

MOE, T.M. [1984], The New Econo-mics of Organization, in «Ameri-can Journal of Political Science»,vol. 28, n. 4, pp. 739-77.

— [1987], An Assessment of thePositive Theory of «CongressionalDominance», in «Legislative Stu-dies Quarterly», vol. 12, n. 4,pp. 475-520.

— [1990], The Politics of StructuralChoice: Toward a Theory of Pu-blic Bureaucracy , in O.E. Wil-liamson (a cura di), OrganizationTheory: From Chester Barnard tothe Present and Beyond, NewYork, Oxford University Press,pp. 116-153.

MOHR, L.B. [1988], Impact Analysis


for Program Evaluation, Chicago,Ill., Dorsey Press.

MORGAN, D.L. [1988], Focus Groupsas Qualitative Research, Newbu-ry Park, Calif., Sage.

MORISI, M. [1999], Anatomia dellamagistratura italiana, Bologna, IlMulino.

MORLINO, L. [1989], Introduzione:ancora un bilancio lamentevole?,in L. Morlino (a cura di), Scienzapolitica , Torino, FondazioneGiovanni Agnelli, pp. 5-52.

— [1989], Teoria e macropolitica, inL. Morlino (a cura di), ScienzaPolitica , Torino, FondazioneGiovanni Agnelli, pp. 53-87.

MOYNIHAN, D.P. [1969], MaximumFeasible Misunderstanding: Com-munity Action in the War on Po-verty, New York, The FreePress.

MUELLER, D. [1989], Public Choice,Cambridge, Cambridge Universi-ty Press, vol. 2.

MULLER, P. [1992], Entre le local etl’Europe la crise du modele fran-cais de politiques publiques, in«Revue Française de Science Po-litique», vol. 42, n. 2, pp. 275-297.

— [1995], Les politiques publiquescomme construction d’un rapportau monde, in A. Faure et al. (acura di), La construction du sensdans les politiques publiques, Pa-ris, L’Harmattan, pp. 153-179.

MUSGRAVE, R.A. [1959], The Theoryof Public Finance, New York,McGraw-Hill; trad. it. parzialeBeni meritori, in Finanza pubbli-ca, equità, democrazia, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1996, pp. 175-192.

MUSGRAVE, R.A. e MUSGRAVE, P.B.[19803], Public Finance in The-ory and Practice, New York, Mc-Graw-Hill.

MUZZIO, D. e DE MAIO, G. [1988],Formal Theory and the Prospects

of a Policy Science, in E.B. Portise M.B. Levy (a cura di), Han-dbook of Political Theory andPolicy Science, Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press, pp. 127-145.

NADEL, M.V. [1975], The HiddenDimension of Public Policy: Pri-vate Governments and the Policy-Making Process, in «Journal ofPolitics», vol. 37, n. 1, pp. 2-34.

NAGEL, S.S. [1986], Efficiency, Effec-tiveness, and Equity in PublicPolicy Evaluation, in «Policy Stu-dies Review», vol. 6, n. 1, pp.99-120.

— [1990], Conflicting Evaluationsof Policy Studies, in Lynn e Wil-davsky [1990, 421-461].

— [1994], Systematic Policy Evalua-tion, in S.S. Nagel (a cura di),Encyclopedia of Policy Studies,New York, Marcel Dekker, pp.31-48.

NAISBITT, J. [1982], Megatrends: TenNew Directions TransformingOur Lives, New York, Warner.

NAKAMURA, R.T. e SMALLWOOD, F.[1980], The Politics of PolicyImplementation , New York, St.Martin’s.

NASH, J.F. [1950], Equilibrium Poin-ts in N-Person Games, in Procee-dings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States ofAmerica, n. 36, pp. 48-49.

NATIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW

[1993], From Red Tape to Resul-ts: Creating a Government ThatWorks Better and Costs Less,Washington, D.C., GovernmentPrinting Office; trad. it. Creareuna pubblica amministrazione chelavori meglio e costi meno, Rimi-ni, Maggioli, 1995.

NAVARR O , P. [1984] , The PolicyGame, Lexington, Mass., Lexin-gton Books.

NELSON, B.J. [1996], Public Policy


and Administration: An Over-view, in R.E. Goodin e H.-D.Klingemann (a cura di), A NewHandbook of Political Science,Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 551-592.

NELSON, D.A. [1992] , DeductiveProgram Verification (A Practitio-ner’s Commentary), in «Mindsand Machines», vol. 2, n. 3, pp.283-307.

NEUMANN, J. VON [1928], Zur Theo-rie der Gesellschaftsspiele , in«Mathematisch e Annale», n.100, pp. 295-320.

NEUMANN, J. VON e MORGENSTERN,O. [1944], The Theory of Ga-mes and Economic Behavior,Princeton, N.J., Princeton Uni-versity Press.

NEWELL, A., SHAW, J.C. e SIMON,H.A. [1959], A Variety of Intelli-gent Learning in a General Pro-blem Solver, Santa Monica, Ca-lif., RAND.

NEWELL, A. e SIMON, H.A. [1972],Human Problem Solving, En-glewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

N IENABE R, J. e WILDAVSKY , A.[1973], The Budgeting and Eva-luation of Federal Recreation Pro-grams, New York, Basic Books.

NIOCHE, J.-P. e POINSARD , R.[1985], Public Policy Evaluationin France, in «Journal of PolicyAnalysis and Management», vol.5, n. 1, pp. 58-72.

NISKANEN, W.A. [1971], Bureaucracyand Representative Government,Chicago, Ill., Aldine-Atherton.

— [1973], Bureaucracy: Servant orMaster?, London, Institute ofEconomic Affairs; trad. it. Buro-crazia: serva o padrona?, Torino,Biblioteca della libertà, 1979.

— [1998], Policy Analysis and Pu-blic Choice: Selected Papers byWilliam A. Niskanen, Chel-tenham, Elgar.

NIZARD, L. [1973], Administration etsocieté: Planification et regula-tions bureaucratiques, in «RevueFrançaise de Science Politique»,vol. 23, n. 2, pp. 100-228.

NOBLE, C. [1987], Economic Theoryin Practice: White House Oversightof OSHA Health Standards, in F.Fischer e J. Forester (a cura di),Confronting Values in PolicyAnalysis. The Politics of Criteria,Newbury Park, Calif., Sage, pp.266-284.

NORDHAUS, W.D. [1975], The Politi-cal Business Cycle, in «Review ofEconomic Studies», vol. 42, pp.169-190.

NORTH, D.C. [1990], Institutions,Institutional Change, and Econo-mic Performance , Cambridge,Mass., Cambridge UniversityPress; trad. it. Istituzioni, cambia-mento istituzionale, evoluzionedell’economia, Bologna, Il Muli-no, 1994.

— [1993], Institutions and CredibleCommitment, in «Journal of In-stitutional and Theoretical Eco-nomics», n. 149, n. 1, pp. 11-23.

NORTH, D.C. e WEINGAST, B.R.[1989], Constitutions and Com-mitment: The Evolution of Insti-tutions Governing Public Choicein the 17th Century in England,in «The Journal of EconomicHistory», vol. 49, n. 4, pp. 803-832.

NUTI, F. [1989], L’analisi costi bene-fici, Bologna, Il Mulino.

OCSE [1996], Building Policy Cohe-rence: Tools and Tensions, Paris.

OKUN, A.M. [1970], The PoliticalEconomy of Prosperity, NewYork, Norton.

— [1975], Equality and Efficiency:The Big Tradeoff, Washington,D.C., The Brookings Institution;trad. it. Eguaglianza ed efficienza.


Il grande trade-off, Napoli, Li-guori, 1990.

OLIVER, P. [1980], Rewards and Pu-nishments in Selective Incentivesfor Collective Action: TheoreticalInvestigation s, in «AmericanJournal of Sociology», vol. 85, n.6, pp. 1356-1375.

OLSON, M. [1965], The Logic of Col-lective Action, Cambridge,Mass., Harvard University Press;trad. it. La logica dell’azione col-lettiva, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1983.

— [2000], Power and Prosperity.Outgrowing Communist and Ca-pitalist Dictatorships, New York,Basic Books.

OLSON, M. e CLAGUE, C.K. [1976],Dissent in Economics: The Con-vergence of Extremes , in R.C.Amacher, R.D. Tollison, T.D.Willett (a cura di), The Econo-mic Approach to Public Policy,Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell UniversityPress, pp. 79-99.

OPP, K.-D. [1999], Contending Con-ceptions of the Theory of Ratio-nal Action, in «Journal of Theo-retical Politics», vol. 11, n. 2, pp.171-202.

ORDESHOOK, P.C. [1986], Game The-ory and Political Theory, Cam-bridge, Mass., Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

— [1992], A Political Theory Pri-mer, New York, Routledge.

— [1993], The Development ofContemporary Political Theory,in W.A. Barnett, M.J. Hinich eN.J. Schofield (a cura di), Politi-cal Economy: Institutions, Com-petition, and Representation ,New York, Cambridge Universi-ty Press, pp. 71-104.

ORDESHOOK, P.C. e PALFREY, T.R.[1988], Agendas, Strategic Vo-ting, and Signaling with Incom-plete Information, in «AmericanJournal of Political Science», vol.32, n. 2, pp. 441-466.

ORDESHOOK, P.C. e SHEPSLE, K.A.(a cura di) [1982], Political Equi-librium, Boston, Mass., Nijhoff.

ORNAGHI, L. [1996], Teorie dellapolitica, in G. Capano e M. Giu-liani (a cura di), Dizionario dipolitiche pubbliche, Roma, LaNuova Italia Scientifica, pp. 409-419.

OSBORNE, D. e GAEBLER, T. [1992],Reinventing Government: Howthe Entrepreneuria l Spirit isTransforming the Public Sector,Reading, Mass., Addison-We-sley; trad. it. Dirigere e governa-re, Milano, Garzanti, 1995.

OSBORN E, M.J. e RUBINSTEIN, A.[1994], A Course in Game The-ory, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT

Press.OSTROM, E. [1972], Metropolitan

Reform: Propositions Derivedfrom Two Traditions, in «SocialScience Quarterly», vol. 53, n. 3,pp. 474-493.

— [1983], A Public Service IndustryApproach to the Study of LocalGovernment Structure and Per-formance, in «Policy and Politi-cs», vol. 11, n. 3, pp. 313-341.

— [1990] , Governing the Com-mons. The Evolution of Institu-tions for Collective Action, Cam-bridge, Mass., Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

— [1998], A Behavioral Approachto the Rational Choice Theory ofCollective Action, in «AmericanPolitical Science Review», vol.92, n. 1, pp. 1-22.

— [1999] , Institutional RationalChoice: An Assessment of the In-stitutional Analysis and Develop-ment Framework, in Sabatier[1999, 35-71].

OSTROM, V. [1973], The IntellectualCrisis in American Public Admi-nistration, University, Ala., Uni-versity of Alabama Press.


— [1977], Some Problems in DoingPolitical Theory: A Response toGolembiewski’s «Critique» , in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 71, n. 4, pp. 1508-1525; trad. it. Alcuni probleminel costruire una teoria politica:risposta alla «critica» di Golem-biewski, in «Problemi di ammi-nistrazione pubblica», 1978, vol.3, n. 3-4, pp. 71-120.

— [1980], Artisanship and Artifact,in «Public Administration Re-view», vol. 40, n. 4, pp. 309-317.

OSTROM, V. e OSTROM, E. [1978],Public Goods and Public Choices,in E.S. Savas (a cura di), Alter-natives for Delivering Public Ser-vices. Toward Improved Perfor-mance, Boulder, Colo., WestviewPress, pp. 7-49.

O’TOOLE, L.J. [1997], The Implica-tions for Democracy in aNetworked Bureaucratic World,in «Journal of Public Admini-stration Research and Theory»,vol. 7, n. 3, pp. 443-459.

PAGE, B.I. [1996], Who Deliberates?Mass Media in Modern Demo-cracy, Chicago, Ill., University ofChicago Press.

PAGE, B.I. e SHAPIRO, R.Y. (a curadi) [1992], The Rational Public:Fifty Years of Trends in Ameri-can’s Policy Preferences, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

PAGE, E. [1985], Political Authorityand Bureaucrati c Power , Bri-ghton, Wheatsheaf.

PALUMBO, D. [1987], The Politics ofProgram Evaluation, NewburyPark, Calif., Sage.

PANEBIANCO, A. [1989], Le scienzesociali e i limiti dell’illuminismoapplicato, in A. Panebianco (acura di), L’analisi della politica,Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 563-596.

PARETO, V. [1988], Trattato di socio-

logia generale, Torino, UTET (I ed.1916).

PARIS, D.C. [1988], Policy Inquiryand Rational Ideologies, in E.B.Portis e M.B. Levy (a cura di),Handbook of Political Theory andPolicy Science, Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press, pp. 75-89.

PARIS, D.C. e REYNOLDS, J.F. [1983],The Logic of Policy Inquiry, NewYork, Longman.

PARSONS, T. [1966], The Political As-pect of Social Structure and Pro-cess, in Easton [1966, 71-112].

PARSONS, W. [1995], Public Policy:An Introduction to the Theoryand Practice of Policy Analysis,Cheltenham, Elgar.

PASQUINO, G. [1986a], Natura e evo-luzione della disciplina, in G. Pa-squino (a cura di), Manuale discienza della politica, Bologna, IlMulino, pp. 13-37.

— [1986b], The Impact of Institu-tions on Party Government: Ten-tative Hypotheses, in Castles eWildemann [1986, 120-142].

— [1989], La scienza politica appli-cata: l’ingegneria politica, in A.Panebianco (a cura di), L’analisidella politica, Bologna, Il Muli-no, pp. 547-561.

PATTON, M.Q. [19862], Utilization-Focused Evaluation , London-Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.

— [1990], Qualitative Evaluationand Research Methods, London-Newbury Park, Calif., Sage (Ied. 1980).

PEIRCE , C.S. [1868] , Some conse-quences of Four Incapacities, in«Journal of Speculative Philo-sophy», n. 2, pp. 140-157; rist.in Collected Papers of CharlesSander Peirce, Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press, 1931,vol. 2.

PELTZMA N , S. [1976] , Toward aMore General Theory of Regula-


tion , in «Journal of Law andEconomics», vol. 19, n. 2, pp.211-240.

PENNISI, G. [1991], Tecniche di valu-tazione degli investimenti pubbli-ci, Roma, Istituto Poligrafico eZecca dello Stato.

PENNISI, G. e PETERLIN I, E.M.[1987], Spesa pubblica e bisognodi inefficienza: l’esperienza delFondo investimenti e occupazio-ne, 1982-1986, Bologna, Il Muli-no.

PERKINS, F. [1994], Practical CostBenefit Analysis: Basic Conceptsand Applications , Melbourne,Macmillan.

PERRY, H.W. [1992], Deciding toDecide: Agenda-Setting in theU.S. Supreme Court, Cambridge,Mass., Harvard University Press.

PETERS, B.G. [1981], The Problem ofBureaucrati c Government, in«Journal of Politics», vol. 43, n.1, pp. 56-82.

— [1996] , The Future of Gover-ning, Lawrence, University Pressof Kansas.

— [1998], The Experimenting So-ciety and Policy Design, in W.N.Dunn (a cura di), The Experi-menting Society, New Brun-swick, N.J., Transaction , pp.125-139.

— [1999], Institutional Theory inPolitical Science. The «New Insti-tutionalism», London, Pinter.

PETERS, B.G. e BARKER, A. [1993],Governments, Information, Advi-ce and Policy-Making, in B.G.Peters e A. Barker (a cura di),Advising West European Govern-ments, Edinburgh, EdinburghUniversity Press, pp. 1-19.

PETERS, B.G., DOUGHTIE, J.C. e MC-CULLOCH, K.M. [1977], Types ofDemocratic Systems and Types ofPublic Policies, in «ComparativePolitics», vol. 9 (aprile), pp. 327-355.

PETERS, T.J. [1988], Thriving onChaos, New York, Harper andRow; trad. it. Prosperare nel caos:tempi pazzi, aziende pazze, Mila-no, Sperling & Kupfer, 1989.

— [1997], Intervista, in «Electro-sphere», vol. 5, n. 12.

PETERS, T.J. e WATERMAN, R. JR.[1982], In Search of Excellence,New York, Warner; trad. it. Allaricerca dell’eccellenza, Milano,Sperling & Kupfer, 1984.

PIERSON, P. [1994], Dismantling theWelfare State?, Cambridge, Cam-bridge University Press.

— [2000a], Increasing Returns, PathDependence and the Study of Po-litics, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 94, n. 2,pp. 251-267.

— [2000b], The Limits of Design:Explaining Institutional Originsand Change, in «Governance»,vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 475-499.

PIGOU, A.C. [1932], The Economicsof Welfare, London, Macmillan(I ed. 1912); trad. it. Economiadel benessere, Torino, UTET,1968.

PISELLI, F. [1997], Il network socialenell’analisi del potere e dei pro-cessi politici, in «Stato e Merca-to», vol. 50, n. 2, pp. 287-316.

PIZZORNO, A. [1993], Le radici dellapolitica assoluta, Milano, Feltri-nelli.

PLOTT, C.R. [1967] , A Notion ofEquilibrium and Its PossibilityUnder Majority Rule, in «Ameri-can Economic Review», vol. 57,n. 4, pp. 787-806.

PLOTT, C.R. e LEVINE, M.E. [1978],A Model of Agenda Influence onCommittee Decisions, in «Ameri-can Economic Review», vol. 68,n. 1, pp. 146-160.

POLSBY, N.W. [1984], Political Inno-vation in America: The Politics ofPolicy Initiation , New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.


POOLE, K.T. e ROSENTHA L, H.[1997], Congress: A Political-Eco-nomic History of Roll-Call Vo-ting, New York, Oxford Univer-sity Press.

POSNER, R.A. [1983], The Economicsof Justice , Cambridge , Mass.,Harvard University Press.

— [1993], Interpretation Revisited,in S.J. Brison e W. Sinnott-Arm-strong (a cura di), ContemporaryPerspectives on ConstitutionalInterpretation , Boulder, Colo.,Westview Press, pp. 102-117.

POUNCY, H. [1988], Terms of Agree-ment: Evaluating the Theory ofSymbolic Politics’ Impact on thePluralist Research Program, in«American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 32, n. 3, pp. 780-795.

POWELL, W.W. (a cura di) [1987],The Nonprofit Sector: A ResearchHandbook, New Haven, Conn.,Yale University Press.

— [1991], Neither Market nor Hie-rarchy: Network Forms of Orga-nization, in Thompson, Frances,Levacic e Mitchell [1991, 265-276].

POWELL, W.W. e DIMAGGIO, P.J. (acura di) [1991], The New Insti-tutionalism in OrganizationalAnalysis, Chicago, Ill., Universityof Chicago Press; trad. it. Il neo-istituzionalismo nell’analisi orga-nizzativa , Torino, Comunità,2000.

PREDIERI, A. (a cura di) [1996], Fon-di strutturali e coesione economi-ca e sociale nell’Unione Europea,Milano, Giuffré.

PRESSMAN, J.L. e WILDAVSKY, A.[1973], Implementation, Berke-ley, University of CaliforniaPress (II ed. 1979; III ed. 1984).

PUTNAM, R. [1973], The Political At-titudes of Senior Civil Servants in

Britain, Germany and Italy, in

«British Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 257-290.

QUADE, E.S. [1980], Pitfalls in For-mulation and Modeling, in Majo-ne e Quade [1980, 23-43].

QUADE, E.S. e BOUCHER, W.I. (acura di) [1968], Systems Analysisand Policy Planning, New York,Elsevier; trad. it. Analisi dei si-stemi e processi decisionali, Mila-no, Angeli, 1977.

RADAELLI, C.M. [1995], The Role ofKnowledge in the Policy Process,in «Journal of European PublicPolicy», vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 159-183.

RADAELLI, C.M. e DENTE, B. [1995],Valutazione e scienza politica: undialogo possibile, in G. Regonini(a cura di), Politiche pubbliche edemocrazia, Napoli , EdizioniScientifiche Italiane, pp. 147-185.

RAIFFA, H. [1968], Decision Analysis,Reading, Mass., Addison-We-sley.

RANCI, C. [1999], Oltre il Welfarestate: terzo settore, nuove solida-rietà e trasformazioni del welfare,Bologna, Il Mulino.

RANNEY, A. (a cura di) [1968], Poli-tical Science and Public Policy,Chicago, Ill., Markham.

RAWLS, J. [1972], A Theory of Justice,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Uni-versity Press; trad. it. Una teoriadella giustizia, Milano, Feltrinelli,1982.

REBBA, V. [1993], Valutazione deiprogetti in un quadro federale:aspetti dell’esperienza statuniten-se, in Florio e Robotti [1993,225-297].

REDNER, H. [1982], In the BeginningWas the Deed, Berkeley, Univer-sity of California Press.


REICH, R.B. (a cura di) [1988], ThePower of Public Ideas, Cambrid-ge, Mass., Harvard UniversityPress.

REGONINI, G. [1984], Public Choice:una teoria per l’analisi delle poli-tiche pubbliche, in «Stato e Mer-cato», vol. 11, n. 2, pp. 299-328.

— [1985], Le politiche sociali in Ita-lia: metodi di analisi, in «Rivistaitaliana di scienza politica», vol.15, n. 3, pp. 335-377.

— [1989], Lo studio delle politichepubbliche, in A. Panebianco (acura di), L’analisi della politica,Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 491-516.

— [1993], Il principe e il povero, in«Stato e Mercato», vol. 39, n. 3,pp. 361-403.

— [1995], Politiche pubbliche e po-tere, in G. Regonini (a cura di),Politiche pubbliche e democrazia,Napoli, Edizioni Scientifiche Ita-liane, pp. 21-102.

— [1996a], Partiti e pensioni: lega-mi mancanti, in M. Cotta e P.Isernia (a cura di), Il gigante daipiedi di argilla, Bologna, Il Muli-no, pp. 73-137.

— [1996b], Studio delle politiche pub-bliche, in G. Capano e M. Giulia-ni (a cura di), Dizionario di politi-che pubbliche, Roma, La NuovaItalia Scientifica, pp. 392-403.

RESNIK, M.D. [1987], Choices: AnIntroduction to Decision Theory,Minneapolis, University of Min-nesota Press; trad. it. Scelte. In-troduzione alla teoria delle deci-sioni , Padova, Franco Muzio,1990.

RHODES, R.A.W. [1994], The Hol-lowing Out of the State: TheChanging Nature of the PublicService in Britain, in «PoliticalQuarterly», vol. 65, n. 2, pp.138-151.

— [1995], The New Governance:Governing without Government,

Swindon, Economic and SocialResearch Council.

— [1997], Understanding Gover-nance: Policy Networks, Gover-nance, Reflexivity and Accounta-bility, Buckingham, Open Uni-versity Press.

RHODES, R.A.W e MARSH, D.[1992], New Directions in theStudy of Policy Networks, in«European Journal of PoliticalResearch», vol. 21, n. 1-2, pp.181-205.

RICCI, D.M. [1993], The Transforma-tion of American Politics: TheNew Washington and the Rise ofThink Tanks, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press.

RICHARDSON, J.J. (a cura di) [1982],Policy Styles in Western Europe,London, Allen & Unwin.

RICHARDSON, J.J. e DUDLEY , G.[1996] , Le privatizzazion i inGran Bretagna: innovazione disuccesso e implementazione diffi-cile?, in «Stato e Mercato», vol.47, n. 2, pp. 235-269.

RICHARDSON, J.J. e JORDAN, G.[1979], Governing under Pressu-re: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy, Ox-ford, Robertson.

RIGANTI, P. [2001], La valutazionedei Fondi Strutturali dell'UnioneEuropea, in M. Morisi e A. Lippi(a cura di), Manuale di Scienzadell'amministrazione. La valuta-zione, Torino, Giappichelli.

RIKER, W.H. [1980], Implicationsfrom the Disequilibrium of Majo-rity Rule for the Study of Institu-tions, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 73, n. 1,pp. 85-102; rist. in P.C. Orde-shook e K.A. Shepsle [1982, 3-24].

— [1982], Liberalism Against Popu-lism, Chicago, Ill., WavelandPress (II ed. 1988); trad. it. Libe-


ralismo contro populismo, Mila-no, Comunità, 1996.

— [1983], Political Theory and theArt of Heresthetics, in A.W. Fi-nifter (a cura di), Political Scien-ce: The State of the Discipline,Washington , D.C., AmericanPolitical Science Association, pp.47-67.

— [1984], The Heresthetics of Con-stitution-Making: The Presidencyin 1787, with Comments on De-terminism and Rational Choice,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 78, n. 1, pp. 1-16.

— [1986], The Art of Political Ma-nipulation, New Haven, Conn.,Yale University Press.

RIKER, W.H. e ORDESHOOK, P.C.[1973], An Introduction to Posi-tive Political Theory, EnglewoodCliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

RIPLEY, R.B. e FRANKLIN , G.A.[1984], Congress, The Bureau-cracy, and Public Policy , Ho-mewood, Ala., Dorsey Press.

RIST, R.C. [1987], Introduction, inR.C. Rist (a cura di), Policy Stu-dies Review Annual, New Brun-swick, N.J., Transaction, pp. 1-5.

RITTEL , H.W. e WEBBE R, M.M.[1973], Dilemmas in a GeneralTheory of Planning, in «PolicySciences», vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 156-169.

RIZZELLO, S. [1997], L’economia del-la mente, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

ROBBINS, L. [1932], An Essay on theNature and Significance of Econo-mic Science, London, Macmillan;trad. it. Saggio sulla natura el’importanza della scienza econo-mica, Torino, UTET, 1947.

ROHDE, D.W. [1991], Parties andLeaders in the Postreform House,Chicago, Ill., University of Chi-cago Press.

ROHR, J.A. [1986], To Run a Consti-tution: The Legitimacy of the

Administrative State, Lawrence,University Press of Kansas.

ROKKAN, S. [1966], Norway: Nume-rical Democracy and CorporatePluralism, in R.A. Dahl (a curadi), Political Oppositions in We-stern Democracies, New Haven,Conn., Yale University Press,pp. 70-115.

ROMER, T. e ROSENTHAL, H. [1978],Political Resource Allocation,Controlled Agendas, and the Sta-tus Quo, in «Public Choice»,vol. 33, n. 4, pp. 27-43.

RONGE, V. [1974], The Politicizationof Administration in AdvancedCapitalist Societies, in «Res Pu-blica», vol. 16, n. 2, pp. 233-246.

RORTY, R. [1982], Consequences ofPragmatism: Essays (1972-1980),Minneapolis, University of Min-nesota Press; trad. it. Conseguen-ze del pragmatismo, Milano, Fel-trinelli, 1986.

— [1995], Il progresso del pragmati-sta, in U. Eco (a cura di), Inter-pretazione e sovrainterpretazione,Milano, Bompiani.

ROSE, R. [1974], The Problem of Par-ty Government, London, Mac-millan.

— [1976], The Dynamics of PublicPolicy, London-Beverly Hills,Calif., Sage.

— (a cura di) [1980], Challenge toGovernance. Studies in Overloa-ded Polities, London, Sage.

— [1984], Do Parties Make a Diffe-rence?, London, Macmillan (Ied. 1980).

— [1989], Ordinary People in Pu-blic Policy. A Behavioural Analy-sis, London, Sage.

— [1993], Lesson-drawing in PublicPolicy : A Guide to Learningacross Time and Space, Chatham,Chatham House.

ROSE, R. e DAVIES, P. [1994], Inheri-tance in Public Policy: Change


without Choice in Britain, NewHaven, Conn., Yale UniversityPress.

ROSEN, S. [1987], Systems Analysisand the Quest for Rational De-fense, in R.C. Rist (a cura di),Policy Studies Review Annual,New Brunswick, N.J., Transac-tion, pp. 12-25.

ROSENAU, J.N. e CZEMPIEL , E.-O.[1992], Governance without Go-vernment, Cambridge, Cambrid-ge University Press.

ROSENBERG, G.N. [1991], The Hol-low Hope: Can Courts Bringabout Social Change?, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

ROURKE, F.E. [1976], Bureaucracy,Politics and Public Policy, Bo-ston, Mass., Little, Brown.

RUBINSTEIN, A. [1982], Perfect Equi-librium in a Bargaining Model, in«Econometrica», vol. 50, n. 1,pp. 97-110.

RUSCONI, G.E. (a cura di) [1989],Giochi e paradossi in politica,Bologna, Il Mulino.

SABATIER, P.A. [1986], Top-downand Bottom-up Approaches toImplementation Research: A Cri-tical Analysis and Suggested Syn-thesis, in «Journal of Public Po-licy», vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 21-48.

— [1999a], Fostering the Develop-ment of Policy Theory, in Saba-tier [1999b, 261-275].

— (a cura di) [1999b], Theories ofthe Policy Process, Boulder,Colo., Westview Press.

SABATIER, P.A. e JENKINS-SMITH ,H.C. [1993], The Dynamics ofPolicy-Oriented Learning, in P.A.Sabatier e H.C. Jenkins-Smith (acura di), Policy Change and Lear-ning: An Advocacy Coalition Ap-proach, Boulder , Colo., We-stview Press, pp. 41-56.

— [1999], The Advocacy Coalition

Framework: An Assessment, inSabatier [1999b, 117-166].

SABATIER, P.A. e MAZMANIAN, D.A.[1983], Policy implementation, inS.S. Nagel (a cura di), Encyclope-dia of Policy Studies, New York,Marcel Dekker, pp. 143-169.

SABATO, L.J. [1981], The Rise of Po-litical Consultants, New York,Basic Books.

SABEL, C.F. [1993], ConstitutionalOrdering in Historical Context,in F.W. Scharpf (a cura di), Ga-mes in Hierarchies and Net-works, pp. 65-123.

SALISBURY, R.H. [1968], The Analy-sis of Public Policy: A Search forTheories and Roles, in Ranney[1968, 151-175].

— [1984], Interest Representation:The Dominance of Institutions,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 78, n. 1, pp. 64-76.

SALISBURY, R.H. e HEINZ, J. [1970],A Theory of Policy Analysis andSome Preliminary Applications, inI. Sharkansky (a cura di), PolicyAnalysis in Political Science, Chi-cago, Ill., Markham, pp. 39-60.

SAMUELSON, P.A. [1954], The PureTheory of Public Expenditure, in«Review of Economics and Stati-stics», vol. 36, n. 4, pp. 387-389;trad. it. La teoria pura della spesapubblica, in Analisi economica,ottimizzazione, benessere, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino, 1993, pp. 175-180.

— [1972], The 1972 Nobel Prize forEconomic Science, in «Science»,vol. 178, pp. 487-489.

SARTORI, G. [1971], La politica com-parata: premesse e problemi, in«Rivista italiana di scienza politi-ca», vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 7-66.

— [1972], Cosa è «Politica», in «Ri-vista italiana di scienza politica»,vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 3-26.

— [1979], La politica. Logica e me-


todo in scienze sociali, Milano,SugarCo.

— [1989], The Essence of the Politi-cal in Carl Schmitt, in «Journalof Theoretical Politics», vol. 1,n. 1, pp. 63-75.

— [1994], Comparative Constitutio-nal Engineering: An Inquiry intoStructures, Incentives, and Outco-mes, New York, New York Uni-versity Press; trad. it. Ingegneriacostituzionale comparata: struttu-re, incentivi ed esiti, Bologna, IlMulino, 1995.

— [1999] , Homo videns , Roma-Bari, Laterza.

SCHANK, R.C. e ABELSO N , R.P.[1977], Scripts, Plans, Goals andUnderstanding: An Inquiry intoHuman Knowledge Structures,Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.

SCHARPF, F.W. [1973], Planung alspolitischer Prozess: Aufsätze zurTheorie der planenden Demokra-tie, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

— [1977], Public Organization andthe Waning of the Welfare State:A Research Perspective, in «Eu-ropean Journal of Political Rese-arch», vol. 5, n. 4, pp. 339-362.

— [1978], Interorganizational PolicyStudies, in Hanf e Scharpf[1978, 345-370].

— [1986], La trappola della decisio-ne congiunta: federalismo tedescoe integrazione europea, in «Statoe Mercato», vol. 17, n. 2, pp.175-216.

— [1989], Decision Rules, DecisionStyles and Policy Choices, in«Journal of Theoretical Politics»,vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 149-176.

— [1990] , Games Real ActorsCould Play. The Problem of Mu-tual Predictability, in «Rationalityand Society», vol. 2, n. 4, pp.471-94.

— [1993], Coordination in Hierar-chies and Networks, in F.W.

Scharpf (a cura di), Games inHierarchies and Networks , pp.125-165.

— [1994], Community and Auto-nomy. Multi-level Policy-makingin the European Union, in «Jour-nal of European Public Policy»,vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 219-242.

— [1997], Games Real Actors Play:Actor-Centered Institutionalismin Policy Research, Boulder,Colo., Westview Press.

SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E.E. [1935], Poli-tics, Pressures, and the Tariff: AStudy of Free Private Enterprisein Pressure Politics, New York,Prentice-Hall.

— [1942], Party Government, NewYork, Rinehart.

— [1948], The Struggle for PartyGovernment, College Park, Uni-versity of Maryland.

— [1960], The Semi-Sovereign Peo-ple, Hillsdale, N.J., The DrydenPress; trad. it. Il popolo semi-so-vrano: un’interpretazione realisti-ca della democrazia in America,Genova, ECIG, 1998.

— [1969], Two Hundred MillionAmericans in Search of a Govern-ment, New York, Holt, Rinehart& Winston.

SCHELLING, T.C. [1960], Strategy ofConflict, Cambridge, Mass., Har-vard University Press.

— [1984], Choice and Consequence,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Uni-versity Press.

SCHICK, A. [1973], A Death in theBureaucracy: The Demise of Fe-deral PPB, in «Public Admini-stration Review», vol. 33, n. 2,pp. 146-156.

SCHMIDT, M.G. [1983], Stato ed eco-nomia in tempo di crisi. Ventitredemocrazie industriali a confronto,in «Rivista italiana di scienza poli-tica», vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 103-138.

SCHMITTER , P.C. [1974], Still the


Century of Corporativism, in«Review of Politics», n. 36, pp.85-131; trad. it. Ancora il secolodel corporativismo? , in Maraffi[1981, 45-85].

— [1977], Modes of Interest Inter-mediation and Models of SocietalChange in Western Europe, in«Comparative Political Studies»,vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 7-38; trad. it.Modalità di madiazione degli in-teressi e mutamento sociale inEuropa Occidentale, in «il Muli-no», n. 248, 1976, pp. 889-917.

— [1996], Some Alternative Futuresfor the European Polity and The-ir Implications for European Pu-blic Policy, in Y. Mény, P. Mul-ler e J.-L. Quermonne (a curadi), Adjusting to Europe, NewYork-London, Routledge, pp.25-40.

SCHMITTER, P.C. E GROTE, J.R.[1997], Sisifo corporatista: passa-to, presente e futuro, in «Stato eMercato», vol. 50, n. 2, pp. 184-215.

SCHNEIDER, J.A., STEVENS , N.J. eTORNATZKY , L. [1982], PolicyResearch and Analysis: An Empi-rical Profile 1975-1980, in «Poli-cy Sciences», vol. 15, n. 2, pp.94-114.

SCHNEIDER, V. [1992], The Structureof Policy Networks: A Compari-son of the «Chemicals Control»and «Telecommunications» PolicyDomains in Germany, in «Euro-pean Journal of Political Resear-ch», vol. 21, n. 1-2, pp. 109-130.

SCHOFIELD, N. [1978], Instability ofSimple Dynamic Games, in «Re-view of Economic Studies», vol.45, n. 3, pp. 575-594.

— [1984], The General Relevanceof the Impossibility Theorem inSmooth Social Choice, in «The-ory and Decision», vol. 16, n. 1,pp. 21-44.

— [1985], Anarchy, Altruism andCooperation: A Review, in «So-cial Choice and Welfare», vol. 2,n. 3, pp. 207-219.

SCHÖN, D.A. [1971], Beyond the Sta-ble State, New York, Norton.

— [1983], The Reflective Practitio-ner: How Professionals Think inAction, New York, Basic Books;trad. it. Il professionista riflessivo:per una nuova epistemologia del-la pratica professionale, Bari, De-dalo, 1993.

SCHÖN, D.A. e REIN, M. [1994], Fra-me Reflection: Toward the Reso-lution of Intractable PolicyControversies, New York, BasicBooks.

SCHULMAN, P.R. [1975], Nonincre-mental Policy Making: Notestoward an Alternative Paradigm,in «American Political ScienceReview», vol. 69, n. 4, pp. 1354-1370.

SCHULTZE, C.L. [1968], The Politicsand Economics of Public Spen-ding, Washington , D.C., TheBrookings Institution.

SCHUMPETER, J.A. [1947], Capitali-sm, Socialism and Democracy ,New York, Harper and Row;trad. it. Capitalismo, socialismo edemocrazia, Milano, Etas Kom-pass, 1977.

SCOTT, J. [1991], Social NetworkAnalysis. A Handbook, London,Sage; trad. it. L’analisi delle retisociali, Roma, La Nuova ItaliaScientifica, 1997.

SELF, P. [1975], Econocrats and thePolicy Process: The Politics andPhilosophy of Cost-Benefit Analy-sis, London, Macmillan.

SELZNICK, P. [1949] , TVA and theGrass Roots, New York, Harperand Row; trad. it. Pianificazioneregionale e partecipazione demo-cratica: il caso della TennesseeValley Authority, Milano, Angeli,1974.


— [1964], Leadership in Admini-stration, New York, Harper andRow; trad. it. La leadership nelleorganizzazioni: un’interpretazionesociologica, Milano, Angeli, 1984.

SEN, A.K. [1970], The Impossibilityof a Paretian Liberal, in «Journalof Political Economy», vol. 78,n. 1, pp. 152-157; trad. it. L’im-possibilità di un liberale paretia-no, in Scelta, benessere, equità,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1986, pp.279-286.

SENGE, P.M. [1990], The Fifth Disci-pline: The Art and Practice ofThe Learning Organization, NewYork, Doubleday; trad. it. Laquinta disciplina, Milano, Sper-ling & Kupfer, 1992.

SHAPLEY, L.S. e SHUBIK, M. [1954],A Method of Evaluating the Di-stribution of Power in a Commit-tee System, in «American Politi-cal Science Review», vol. 48, n.3, pp. 787-792.

SHARKANSKY, I. e HOFFERBERT, R.I.[1969], Dimensions of State Poli-tics, Economics, and Public Poli-cy, in «American Political Scien-ce Review», vol. 63, n. 3, pp.867-80.

SHARPE, L.J. e NEWTON, K. [1984],Does Politics Matter?: The Deter-minants of Public Policy, Oxford,Clarendon Press.

SHEPSLE, K.A. [1979], InstitutionalArrangements and Equilibrium inMultidimensional Voting Models,in «American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 27-59.

— [1992], Congress is a «They»,Not an «It»: Legislative Intent asan Oxymoron, in «InternationalReview of Law and Economics»,vol. 12, n. 2, pp. 239-257.

SHEPSLE, K.A. e WEINGAST, B.R.[1981], Political Preferences forthe Pork Barrel: A Generaliza-

tion, in «American Journal ofPolitical Science», vol. 25, n. 1,pp. 96-111.

— [1984] , Uncovered Sets andSophisticated Outcomes with Im-plications for Agenda Institutions,in «American Journal of PoliticalScience», vol. 29, n. 1, pp. 49-74.

— [1987], The Institutional Foun-dations of Committee Power, in«American Political Science Re-view», vol. 81, n. 1, pp. 85-104.

SHERMAN, L.W. [1983], Patrol Stra-tegies for Police, in J.Q. Wilson(a cura di), Crime and Public Po-licy, San Francisco, Calif., Insti-tute for Contemporary Studies,pp. 145-163.

SHIPAN, C.R. [1997], Designing Judi-cial Review: Interest Groups,Congress, and CommunicationsPolicy, Ann Arbor, University ofMichigan Press.

SIMON, H.A. [1947], AdministrativeBehavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrati-ve Organization, New York,Macmillan; trad. it. Il comporta-mento amministrativo, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1958.

— [1955], A Behavioral Model ofRational Choice, in «QuarterlyJournal of Economics», vol. 69,n. 1, pp. 99-118; trad. it. Unmodello comportamentale di scel-ta razionale, in Causalità, raziona-lità, organizzazione, Bologna, IlMulino, 1985, pp. 119-142.

— [1957], Models of Man: Socialand Rational, New York, Wiley.

— [1966], Political Research: TheDecision-Making Framework, inEaston [1966, 15-24].

— [1972], Theories of Bounded Ra-tionality, in C.B. McGuire e R.Radner (a cura di), Decision andOrganizations, Amsterdam, Nor-th-Holland; trad. it. Le teorie


della razionalità limitata, in Cau-salità, razionalità, organizzazione,Bologna, Il Mulino, 1985, pp.257-277.

— [1973], The Structure of Ill-Struc-tured Problems, in «Artificial In-telligence», vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 181-201.

— [1981], Economic Rationality:Adaptive Artifice, in The Sciencesof the Artificia l; Cambridge ,Mass., The MIT Press; trad. it.La razionalità in economia: unartificio per l’adattamento , inCausalità, razionalità, organizza-zione, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp.341-370.

— [1982], Models of Bounded Ra-tionality, Cambridge, Mass., TheMIT Press; trad. it. Scienza eco-nomica e comportamento umano,Torino, Comunità, 2000.

— [1991], Models of My Life, NewYork, Basic Books; trad. it. Mo-delli per la mia vita, Milano, Riz-zoli, 1992.

— [1998] , Discoverin g Explana-tions, in «Minds and Machines»,vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 7-37.

SINCLAIR, B. [1992], The Emergenceof Strong Leadership in the 1980sHouse of Representative s, in«Journal of Politics», vol. 54, n.3, pp. 657-684.

— [1995], Legislators, Leaders andLawmaking, Baltimore , Md.,Johns Hopkins University Press.

SJOBLOM, G. [1993], Some CriticalRemarks on March and Olsen’s

Rediscovering Institutions, in«Journal of Theoretical Politics»,vol. 5, n. 3, pp. 397-407.

SMITH, G. [1986], The Futures ofParty Government: A Frameworkfor Analysis, in Castles e Wilde-mann [1986, 205-235].

SMITH, J.A. [1989], Think Tanks andthe Politics of Ideas, in D.C. Co-lander e A.W. Coats (a cura di),

The Spread of Economic Ideas,Cambridge, Mass., CambridgeUniversity Press, pp. 175-194.

— [1991], The Idea Brokers. ThinkTanks and the Rise of the NewPolicy Elite , New York, TheFree Press.

SMITH, J.M. [1982], The War of At-trition, in Evolution and the The-ory of Games, New York, Cam-bridge University Press.

SMITH , S.R. e LIPSKY , M. [1993],Non-profits for Hire: The Welfa-re State in the Age of Contrac-ting, Cambridge, Mass., HarvardUniversity Press.

SOLA, G. [1996], Storia della scienzapolitica: teorie, ricerche e paradig-mi contemporane i, Roma, LaNuova Italia Scientifica.

SOLTAN, K.E. [1987], The CausalTheory of Justice, Berkeley, Uni-versity of California Press.

SPRADLEY, J.P. [1979], The Ethno-graphic Interview, New York,Holt, Rinehart & Winston

STACEY, R.D. [1992], Managing Chaos:Dynamic Business Strategies inan Unpredictable World, Lon-don, Kogan; trad. it. Manage-ment e caos: la creatività nel con-trollo strategico dell’impresa, Mi-lano, Guerini, 1996.

— [1996], Complexity and Creativi-ty in Organizations, San Franci-sco, Calif., Bennett-Koehler.

STAME, N. [1998], L’esperienza dellavalutazione, Roma, SEAM.

STEIN, R.M. [1990], The BudgetaryEffects of Municipal Service Con-tracting: A Principal-Agent Expla-nation, in «American Journal ofPolitical Science», vol. 34, n. 2,pp. 471-502.

STEINBERGER, P.J. [1980], Typologiesof Public Policy: Meaning Con-struction and the Policy Process,in «Social Science Quarterly»,vol. 61, n. 2, pp. 185-197; rist. in


«Policy Studies Review Annual»,1981, vol. 5, pp. 27-39.

STEINER, J. [1990], Rational ChoiceTheories and Politics: A ResearchAgenda and a Moral Question, in«PS: Political Science and Politi-cs», vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 46-50.

STIGLER, G.J. [1959], The Politics ofPolitical Economists, in «Quar-terly Journal of Economics», vol.73, n. 4, pp. 522-532.

— [1971], The Theory of EconomicRegulation, in «Bell Journal ofEconomics», vol. 2, n. 3, pp. 3-21; trad. it. La teoria della regola-mentazione economica, in Merca-to, informazione, regolamentazio-ne, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1994,pp. 349-384.

— [1975], The Citizen and the Sta-te: Essays on Regulation, Chica-go, Ill., University of ChicagoPress.

— [1982], The Economist as Prea-cher, and Other Essays, Chicago,Ill., University of Chicago Press.

— [1984], The Intellectual and theMarketplace, Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.

STILLMAN, R.J. [1990], The Peculiar«Stateless» Origins of AmericanPublic Administration, in «PublicAdministration Review», vol. 50,n. 2, pp. 156-167.

STOCKMAN, D.A. [1986], The Triumphof Politics: Why the Reagan Re-volution Failed, New York, Har-per and Row; trad. it. Il prezzodella politica, Milano, Il Sole-24Ore Libri, 1986.

STOKER, R.P. [1991], Reluctant Part-ners: Implementing Federal Poli-cy, Pittsburgh, Pa., University ofPittsburgh Press.

STOKES, D.E. e MILLE R, W.E.[1978], Party Government andthe Saliency of Congress, in D.W.Abbott e E.T. Rogowsky (a curadi), Political Parties, Chicago,

Ill., RAND, pp. 289-303 (I ed.1962).

STOKEY, E. e ZECKHAUSE R, R.[1978] , A Primer for PolicyAnalysis , New York, Norton;trad. it. Introduzione all’analisidelle decisioni pubbliche, Napoli,FORMEZ, 1988.

STONE, D.A. [1988], Policy Paradoxand Political Reason, Boston,Mass., Scott Foresman - Little,Brown.

— [1989], Causal Stories and theFormation of Policy Agendas, in«Political Science Quarterly»,vol. 104, n. 2, pp. 281-300.

STONE, D. [1991], Old Guard versusNew Partisans: Think Tanks inTransition, in «Australian Jour-nal of Political Science», vol. 26,n. 2, pp. 197-215.

SUGDEN, R. [1989], Spontaneous Or-der, in «Journal of Economic Per-spectives», vol. 3, n. 4, pp. 85-97.

TALBERT, J.C., JONES, B.D. e BAUM-GARTNER, F.R. [1995], Nonlegi-slative Hearings and Policy Chan-ge in Congress, in «AmericanJournal of Political Science», vol.39, n. 2, pp. 383-405.

TARROW, S.G. [1977], Between Cen-ter and Periphery: Grassroots Po-liticians in Italy and France, NewHaven, Conn., Yale UniversityPress; trad. it. Tra centro e peri-feria: il ruolo degli amministratorilocali in Italia e in Francia, Bolo-gna, Il Mulino, 1979.

TAYLO R, J.R. e VAN EVER Y, E.J.[1993], The Vulnerable Fortress:Bureaucratic Organization andManagement in the InformationAge, Toronto, University of To-ronto Press.

TEUBNER, G. [1993], Law as an Au-topoietic System, Oxford,Blackwell; trad. it. Il diritto comesistema autopoietico , Milano,Giuffré, 1996.


THOENIG, J.-C. [1978], State Bureau-cracies and Local Government inFrance, in Hanf e Scharpf [1978,167-197].

— [1990], Introduction, in «L’An-née Sociologique», vol. 40, pp.9-15.

THOMPSON, F. e GREEN, M. (a curadi) [1998], Handbook of PublicFinance, New York, MarcelDekker.

THOMPSON, F. e JONES L.R. (1986),Control lership in the PublicSector, in «Journal of PolicyAnalysis and Management», vol.5, n. 3, pp. 547-571.

THOMPSON, G. [1990], The PoliticalEconomy of the New Right, Lon-don, Pinter.

THOMPSON, G., FRANCES, J., LEVA-CIC, R. e MITCHELL, J. (a curadi) [1991], Markets, Hierarchiesand Networks, The Coordinationof Social Life, London, Sage.

TIROLE, J. [1988], The Theory of In-dustrial Organization, Cambrid-ge, Mass., The MIT Press; trad.it. Teoria dell’organizzazione in-dustriale, Milano, Hoepli, 1991.

TOLCHIN, S.J. [1987], Cost-benefitAnalysis and the Rush to Deregu-late: The Use and Misuse of The-ory to Effect Policy Change, inR.C. Rist (a cura di), Policy Stu-dies Review Annual, New Brun-swick, N.J., Transaction, pp. 26-34.

TOLLISON , R.D. [1982] , RentSeeking: A Survey, in «Kyklos»,vol. 35, n. 4, pp. 575-602.

TOLLISON, R.D. e VANBERG, V. (acura di) [1989], Explorationsinto Constitutional Economics,College Station, Texas UniversityPress.

TOCQUEVILLE, A. DE [1835], De lademocratie en Amerique, Paris,Librairie de Charles Gosselin;trad. it. La democrazia in Ameri-ca, Bologna, Cappelli, 1962.

TORGERSON, D. [1986] , BetweenKnowledge and Politics: ThreeFaces of Policy Analysis, in «Poli-cy Sciences», vol. 19, n. 1, pp.33-59.

— [1995], Policy Analysis and Pu-blic Life: The Restoration ofPhronesis?, in J. Farr, J.S. Dry-zek e S.T. Leonard (a cura di),Political Science in History, Cam-bridge, Cambridge UniversityPress, pp. 225-252.

TRIBE, L. [1972] , Policy Science:Analysis or Ideology, in «Philo-sophy and Public Affairs», vol.2, n. 1, pp. 66-110.

TRIGILIA, C. [1982], Modernizzazio-ne, accentramento e decentramen-to politico, in «Stato e Mercato»,vol. 4, pp. 45-92.

— [1992], Sviluppo senza autono-mia: effetti perversi delle politichenel Mezzogiorno , Bologna , IlMulino.

TRUMAN, D.B. [1951], The Govern-mental Process, New York,Knopf; trad. it. parziale in Fisi-chella [1972, 63-74].

TSEBELIS, G. [1990], Nested Games.Rational Choice in ComparativePolitics, Berkeley, University ofCalifornia Press.

— [2000], Veto Players and Institu-tional Analysis, in «Governan-ce», vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 441-474.

TUFTE, E.R. [1974], Data Analysisfor Politics and Policy, Englewo-od Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

— [1978], Political Control of theEconomy, Princeton, N.J., Prin-ceton University Press.

TULLOCK, G. [1965], The Politics ofBureaucracy, Washington, D.C.,Public Affairs Press.

— [1967], The Welfare Costs of Ta-riffs, Monopolies, and Theft, in«Western Economic Journal»,vol. 5, pp. 224-232.

— [1969], An Economic Approach


to Crime, in «Social ScienceQuarterly», vol. 50, n. 1, pp. 59-71; trad. it. Un approccio econo-mico al crimine, in F. Forte e E.Granaglia (a cura di), La nuovaeconomia politica americana, Mi-lano, SugarCo, pp. 104-114.

— [1970], Private Wants, PublicMeans, New York, Basic Books.

— [1971], The Charity of the Un-charitable, in «Western Econo-mic Journal», vol. 9, n. 4, pp.379-392.

— [1972], Economic Imperialism, inBuchanan e Tollison [1972, 317-329].

— [1976], The Vote Motive: An Es-say in the Economics of Politics,London, Institute of EconomicAffairs; trad. it. La motivazionedel voto: Costi della politica econtrollo democratico, in S. Car-rubba e D. Da Empoli (a curadi), Le scelte pubbliche, Firenze,Le Monnier, 1984, pp. 37-97.

TULLOCK, G. e WAGNER, R.E. (acura di) [1978], Policy Analysisand Deductive Reasoning, Lexin-gton, Mass., Lexington Books.

TVERSKY, A. e KAHNEMAN, D.[1986], The Framing of Decisionsand the Psychology of Choice, inJ. Elster (a cura di), RationalChoice, New York, New YorkUniversity Press, pp. 123-141.

URBANI, G. [1970], Metodi, approccie teorie, in G. Sartori (a cura di),Antologia di scienza politica, Bo-logna, Il Mulino, pp. 31-53.

VAN DER LAAR, A. [1981], The Wor-ld Bank and the Poor, Boston,Mass., Nijhoff.

VAN DIJK, T.A. [1977] , Text andContext. Explorations in the Se-mantics and Pragmatics of Di-scourse, London, Longman; trad.it. Testo e contesto: semantica e

pragmatica del discorso, Bologna,Il Mulino, 1980.

VAN DYKE, V. [1968], Process andPolicy as Focal Concepts in Politi-cal Research, in Ranney [1968,23-39].

VAN METER, D.S. e VAN HORN, C.E.[1975], The Policy ImplementationProcess: A Conceptual Framework,in «Administration and Society»,vol. 6, n. 4, pp. 445-488.

VEBLEN, T. [1961] , The Place ofScience in Modern Civilization,New York, Russell and Russell.

VOGEL, D. [1986], National Stiles ofRegulation, Ithaca, N.Y., CornellUniversity Press.

WAGNER, P. e FISCHER, F. [1988],The Politics of a Discipline: Poli-cy Orientations in West GermanyPolitical Science, in «Policy Stu-dies Journal», vol. 16, n. 3, pp.455-477.

WAGNER, R.E. [1988], The Calculusof Consent: A Wicksellian Retro-spective, in «Public Choice», vol.56, n. 2, pp. 153-166.

WALDO, D. [1948], The Administra-tive State: A Study of the Politi-cal Theory of American PublicAdministration, New York, Ro-nald Press.

— [1975], Political Science: Tradi-tion, Discipline, Profession, Scien-ce, Enterprise, in Greenstein ePolsby [1975, 1-130].

— [1990], A Theory of Public Ad-ministration Means in Our Timea Theory of Politics Also, inLynn e Wildavsky [1990, 73-83].

WALKER, J.L. [1969], The Diffusionof Innovations among the Ameri-can States, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 63, n. 3,pp. 880-899.

— [1991] , Mobiliz ing InterestGroups in America: Patrons, Pro-fessions and Social Movements,


Ann Arbor, University of Michi-gan Press.

WALLACE, H., WALLACE, W. eWEBB, C. [1977], Policy Makingin the European Communities,London, Wiley.

WEBBER, D.J. [1986], Analyzing Poli-tical Feasibility: Political Scienti-sts’ Unique Contribution to Poli-cy Analysis, in «Policy StudiesJournal», vol. 14, n. 4, pp. 545-553.

WEBER, M. [1918], Parlament undRegierung im neugeordnetenDeutschland, München, Duncker& Humblot; trad. it. Parlamentoe Governo nel nuovo ordinamen-to della Germania, Bari, Laterza,1919.

— [1919], Politik als Beruf, Wissen-schaft als Beruf, Berlin, Duncker& Humblot; trad. it. Il lavorointellettuale come professione,Torino, Einaudi, 1971.

— [1922], Wirtschaft und Gesell-schaft, Tübingen, Mohr; trad. it.Economia e società, Milano, Co-munità, 1968.

WEEDE, E. [1990], Democracy, PartyGovernment and Rent-seeking asDeterminants of DistributionalInequality in Industrial Societies,in «European Journal of Politi-cal Research», vol. 18, n. 5, pp.515-533.

WEICK, K. [1979 2], The SocialPsychology of Organizing, NewYork: Random House; trad. it.Organizzare: la psicologia socialedei processi organizzativi, Torino,ISEDI, 1993.

WEIMER , D.L. e VINING , A.R.[1998], Policy Analysis. Conceptsand Practice, Englewood Cliffs,N.J., Prentice-Hall.

WEINGAST, B.R. [1992] , FightingFire with Fire: Amending Activi-ty and Institutional Change inthe Postreform Congress, in R.H.

Davidson (a cura di), The PostReform Congress, New York, St.Martin’s, pp. 142-168.

WEINGAST, B.R. e MARSHALL, W.J.[1988], The Industrial Organiza-tion of Congress, in «Journal ofPolitical Economy», vol. 96, n.1, pp. 132-163.

WEINGAST, B.R., SHEPSLE, K.A. eJOHNSEN, C. [1981], The Politi-cal Economy of Benefits and Co-sts: A Neoclassical Approach toDistributive Politics, in «Journalof Political Economy», vol. 89,n. 4, pp. 642-663.

WEISS, C.H. [1972], Evaluation Re-search: Methods of Assessing Pro-gram Effectiveness, EnglewoodCliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

— [1982], Policy Research in theContext of Diffuse Decision-Making, in R.C. Rist (a cura di),Policy Studies Review Annual,New Brunswick, N.J., Transac-tion, pp. 19-35.

— [1987], Evaluating Social Pro-grams: What Have We Learned?,in «Society», vol. 25, n. 1, pp.40-45.

— (a cura di) [1992], Organizationsfor Policy Analysis. Helping Go-vernment Think, Newbury Park,Calif., Sage.

WEISS , J.A. [1982] , Coping withComplexity, in «Journal of PolicyAnalysis and Management», vol.2, n. 1, pp. 66-87.

WELLER, P., BAKVIS, H. e RHODES,R.A.W. (a cura di) [1997], TheHollow Crown: CountervailingTrends in Core Executives, Ba-singstoke, Macmillan.

WHITE, M.J. [1983a], Policy AnalysisModels, in S.S. Nagel (a cura di),Encyclopedia of Policy Studies,New York, Marcel Dekker, pp.43-63.

— [1983b], Policy Analysis andManagement Science, in S.S. Na-


gel (a cura di), Encyclopedia ofPolicy Studies, New York, Mar-cel Dekker, pp. 11-41.

W ICKSELL, K. [1896] , Ein NeuesPrinzip der Gerechten Betsteue-rung, in «Finanztheoretische Un-tersuchugen», pp. 76-87.

WILDAVSKY, A. [1964], The Politicsof the Budgetary Process, Boston,Mass., Little, Brown.

— [1969], Rescuing Policy Analysisfrom PPBS, in «Public Admini-stration Review», vol. 29, n. 2,pp. 189-202.

— [1975], Budgeting. A Comparati-ve Theory of Budgetary Processes,Boston, Mass., Little, Brown;trad. it. Bilancio e sistema politi-co, Milano, Angeli, 1978.

— [1981], Rationality in Writing:Linear and Curvilinear, in «Jour-nal of Public Policy», vol. 1, n.1, pp. 125-140.

— [1987], Choosing Preferences byConstructing Institutions: A Cul-tural Theory of Preference For-mation, in «American PoliticalScience Review», vol. 81, n. 1,pp. 3-21.

— [1990], Introduction, in Lynn eWildavsky [1990, ix-xix].

— [1992], Speaking Truth to Power:The Art and Craft of PolicyAnalysis, New Brunswick, N.J.,Transaction (I ed. 1979).

— [1994], Why Self-Interest MeansLess Outside of a Social Context:Cultural Contributions to a The-ory of Rational Choices, in «Jour-nal of Theoretical Politics», vol.6, n. 2, pp. 131-159.

WILDENMANN, R. [1986], The Pro-blematic of Party Government, inCastles e Wildenmann [1986, 1-30].

WILENSKY, H.L. [1975], The Welfa-re State and Equality: Structuraland Ideological Roots of Public

Expenditures, Berkeley, Universi-ty of California Press.

WILKINS, L. e PATTERSON, P. (a curadi) [1991], Risky Business: Com-municating Issues of Science,Risk, and Public Policy , We-stport, Conn., Greenwood Press.

WILLIAMS, B.R. e PALMATIER, M.A.[1992], The RAND Corporation,in Weiss [1992, 48-68].

WILLIAMSON, J.B., KARP, D.A., DAL-PHIN, J.R. e GRAY, P.S. [1977],The Research Craft , Boston,Mass., Little, Brown.

WILLIAMSON, O.E. [1975], Marketsand Hierarchies: Analysis andAntitrus t Implications, NewYork, The Free Press.

— [1985], The Economic Institu-tions of Capitalism, New York,The Free Press; trad. it. Le isti-tuzioni economiche del capitali-smo, Milano, Angeli, 1987.

— [1993], The Evolving Science ofOrganization, in «Journal of In-stitutional and Theoretical Eco-nomics», vol. 149, n. 1, pp. 36-63.

WILSON, J.Q. [1973], On Pettigrewand Armor : An Afterword , in«The Public Interest», vol. 31,pp. 132-134.

— (a cura di) [1980], The Politicsof Regulation, New York, BasicBooks.

— [1989], Bureaucracy: What Gover-nment Agencies Do and Why TheyDo It, New York, Basic Books.

WILSON, W. [1885], CongressionalGovernment: A Study in Ameri-can Politics, Boston, Mass., Hou-ghton Mifflin.

— [1955], The Study of Public Ad-ministration, Washington, D.C.,Public Affairs Press (I ed. 1887).

WITTROCK, B. e DELEON, P. [1986],Policy as a Moving Target: ACall for Conceptual Realism, in


«Policy Studies Review», vol. 6,n. 1, pp. 44-60.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. [1953], Philo-sophische Untersuchunge n,Oxford, Blackwell; trad. it. Ri-cerche filosofiche, Torino, Einau-di, 1974.

— [1961], Tractatus logico-philo-sophicus, London, Routledge &Kegan Paul; trad. it. Tractatuslogico-philosophicus e Quaderni1914-1916, Torino, Einaudi,1964.

— [1969], On Certainty, Oxford,Blackwell; trad. it. Della certezza,Torino, Einaudi, 1978.

WOLLMANN, H. [1984], Policy Analy-sis: Some Observations on theWest German Scene, in «PolicySciences», vol. 17, n. 1, pp. 27-47.

WOOD , D.B. e WATERMAN , R.[1994], Bureaucratic Dynamics:

The Role of Bureaucracy in a De-mocracy, Boulder, Colo., We-stview Press.

WOODHOUSE, E.J. [2000], Informa-tion Technology , MuddlingThrough, and the Potential Intel-ligence of Democracy, Chicago,Ill., Midwest Political ScienceAssociation.

ZAHARIADIS, N. [1995], Markets, Sta-tes, and Public Policies: Privatiza-tion in Britain and France, AnnArbor, University of MichiganPress.

ZAN, S. [1988], Logiche di azione or-ganizzativa, Bologna, Il Mulino.

ZUCCHINI, F. [1997], L’attività legi-slativa del Parlamento italiano:consociativismo? polarizzazione?,in «Rivista italiana di scienza po-litica», vol. 27, n. 3, pp. 569-609.

Riferimenti bibliografici · RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI 527 Nations and Cultures, in S.S. Nagel (a...

Documents

Transcript of Riferimenti bibliografici · RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI 527 Nations and Cultures, in S.S. Nagel (a...