RHEPP Tungsten Update
description
Transcript of RHEPP Tungsten Update
RHEPP Tungsten Update
Tim RenkSandia National Laboratories
Beam Applications & Initiatives Department
HAPL Program WorkshopAtlanta, GA
February 6, 2004
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
Supported by NRL by the HAPL program by DOE NNSA DP
• Polished W exposed to 400 shots N beam: 1.0 < fluence < 3.7 J/cm2
• Room Temp (RT) exposure• Roughening occurs above 1.25 J/cm2,
consistent with single-shot reflectometer roughening threshold
• Powder Met Mo (one point at 2.5 J/cm2 ): roughness stays near unexposed value
• Above threshold, roughening is a severe function of fluence. Maximum Ra exceeds 22 µm, with P-V height above 70 µm
400 shot Map N shots on Tungsten (Room Temperature):Roughening only above threshold
1
10
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Ra W Ra W untreatRa Mo
Fluence (J.cm2)
R a (micr
ons)
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 11/25/03
W (Powder Met) roughening: SEM imagesas function of shot number: 60 to 1000X
(N 250X @ 2.5 J/cm2)(N 60X @ 6 J/cm2) He 450X @ 1-1.3 J/cm2)
(N 600X @ 4.0 J/cm2)
(N 1000X @ 2.5 J/cm2)
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 11/25/03
60-shot exposure of PM W (500C) @ 6 J/cm2: Resolidification from 2-3 µm depth, consistent with
SIM modeling, no cracking
In depth grains (N 1000X @ 2.5 J/cm2)
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 11/25/03
Hi-Mag image, showing uniform single-xtal (right) and disordered single-xtal (left)
Simulation results:Melt Depth: 2.3 µmMelt Duration: 627 nsMaxTemp: 6648K I.e. above ablation threshold (for 65 ns)Ra = 0.4-0.6 µm
Ablation step: 1-2 µm(165 - 330Å/pulse)
XTEM of 60X-treated PM W (right) show no cracking in depth
Bright-Field TEM image
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 11/25/03
TEM image from 5 µm depth
• Polished Powder Met W exposed to 100 shots N beam @ 2.25 J/cm2 ave /pulse, ~ melting temperature at surface. No melt layer observed.
• 600°C exposure• Sample cracking horizontally/vertically down to 10 µm depth• Suspect fatigue-cracking
FIB-XTEM of 1000-pulse W at 2.25 J/cm2 (ave):Deep horizontal/vertical cracking without melt
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National Laboratories
TJR 11/25/03
Title: (MML_Logo.eps) Creator: Near-surface 5 - 10 µm depth
FIB-STEM of 1000-pulse W at 2.25 J/cm2 (ave):No melting or recrystallization evident
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National Laboratories
TJR 11/25/03
Title: (MML_Logo.eps) Creator: Near-surface
5 - 10 µm depth
Simulation results:Melt Depth: 0.2 µmMelt Duration: 91 nsMaxTemp: 3752K (from 600C)Ra = 2.3 - 4.5 µm
We may have an alternative ‘Foam’ Supplier
Source: Center for Collaborative Research/Research Center for Advanced Science and technology
(CCR/RCAST) Prof. Tatsuhiko Aizawa
• Type1: W-25Re alloy, cell-structured No carbon, only W-25Re alloyColumn thickness: 50-100 µmPore: < 50 µm
• Type 2: W-25Re Alloy, honeycomb No carbon, only alloycolumn thickness: 100 µm
• Prof. Aizawa to visit SNL March 22, 2004
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 2/4/2004
Summary
• Tungsten: surface roughening excessive (PowderMet), with fatigue cracking below surface maybe even worse. Mitigating: CVD/SingXtal, alloying with Re, heating. Cracking looks like enough to compromise performance as armor coating.
• Roughening occurs over hundreds of shots. Topology may stabilize for W by 1000 shots, looks to increase for other metals beyond this.
• Below the roughening threshold (1.25 J/cm2), W may be topologically stable to repeated ion exposure.
• No W recrystallization below melting temp appears to take place• Both 60X-6J/cm2 and 1000X-2.5J/cm2 sample response consistent
with SIM modeling• Next: treatment of W on SiC, extended treatment of various
samples to 2,000 shots
Pulsed Power Sciences, Sandia National LaboratoriesTJR 11/25/03