RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies -...

6
eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effecveness Test Report Model: Black Hole Standard Faraday Bag 900 MHz ~ 44 dB * 1.8 GHz ~ 46 dB * 2.1 GHz ~ 44 dB * 2.4 GHz ~ 50dB * Average Signal Aenuaon Test Graph Test Method The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono- pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro- magnecally shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effecveness. The mulple measurements were made in various configuraons to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the condions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effecveness of Electromagnec Shield- ing Enclosures.

Transcript of RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies -...

Page 1: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole Standard Faraday Bag

900 MHz ~ 44 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 46 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 44 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 50dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

 

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.

Page 2: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole Standard Faraday Bag - Non Window

900 MHz ~ 58 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 60 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 60 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 54 dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.

 

Page 3: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole Large Faraday Bag

900 MHz ~ 41 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 42 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 48 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 41 dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.

 

Page 4: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole Large Faraday Bag in Camo

900 MHz ~ 41 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 42 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 48 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 41 dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.

 

Page 5: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole Large Faraday Bag - Non Window

900 MHz ~ 62 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 53 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 60 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 51 dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.

 

Page 6: RF Shielding Technology - Teel Technologies - …teeltech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-Hole-Faraday-Bag... · eDEC Digital Forensics RF Shielding Technology Shielding Effectiveness

eDEC Digital ForensicsRF Shielding Technology

Shielding Effectiveness Test Report

Model: Black Hole XLarge Faraday Bag

900 MHz ~ 53 dB* 1.8 GHz ~ 43 dB* 2.1 GHz ~ 47 dB* 2.4 GHz ~ 43 dB*

Average Signal Attenuation

Test Graph

Test Method

The input and output ports of a Network Analyzer were each connected to a 50-ohm, quad-band mono-pole antenna with low-loss, high frequency SMA jumpers. The antennas were separated by 1-meter and a baseline transmission measurement from 800 MHz-2.5 GHz was recorded inside of an electro-magnetically shielded environment. The “receive” antenna was then enveloped by the eDEC faraday bag and then another measurement was recorded. The two measurements were then subtracted from another to determine the Shielding Effectiveness. The multiple measurements were made in various configurations to ensure consistent and repeatable results. This test is meant to replicate the conditions called out in the IEEE 299 Standard Method for Measuring the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Shield-ing Enclosures.