Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

21
UK Sports Medicine Conference Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Case Presentation Jeremy M. Burnham, MD UK Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine

Transcript of Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Page 1: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

UK Sports Medicine Conference

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

Case Presentation

Jeremy M. Burnham, MDUK Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine

Page 2: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

History:

• CC: trouble with right knee• HPI: 23 yo WM, college student• c/o sharp/stabbing intermittent pain,

mostly on medial side of knee• Occasional feelings of instability• Unable to stop, cut, or change

direction• 2 year history of pain and swelling,

recent progression of symptoms• No recent injury

Page 3: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

History:

• PMH/PSH: Non-contact ACL tear sometime in 2009, subsequently developed symptomatic medial meniscus tear

• ACL Recon with soft tissue allograft 2/2010• Partial medial menisectomy• 9x35 Stryker bioabsorbable screw

proximally, distal fixation was 9x20mm retro Arthrex bioabsorbable inside-out• Describes femoral tunnel at 11

o’clock• MRI read 8/2012 shows intact

graft with increased intra-substance signal

Page 4: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Physical Exam:

• No effusion, knee ROM 0-135, positive Lachman, positive anterior drawer, positive pivot shift

• TTP medial jointline• Stable to v/v at 0/30, no patellar

maltracking

Page 5: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Preop XR’s:

Page 6: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings:

• Previous ACL remnant with very few fibers left• Tibial side noted to be posterior• Bucket handle medial meniscus

tear• Radial tear of lateral meniscus

Page 7: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Procedures 8/22/13:

• Revision right ACL-R• 80% partial medial menisectomy• 15% partial lateral menisectomy

Page 8: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings – Old ACL Graft Remnants:

Page 9: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings – Medial Meniscus:

Page 10: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings – Old Femoral Tunnel:

Page 11: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings – Old Femoral Tunnel:

Page 12: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Surgical Findings – New Graft:

Page 13: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Recent Postop Visit:

• Pain controlled• Expected effusion• Drain was pulled POD#1• Advanced per protocol• No postoperative complications

Page 14: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Postop XR’s:

Page 15: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Morgan, J. A., Dahm, D., Levy, B., Stuart, M. J., & Group, M. S. (2012). Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction. J Knee Surg, 25(5), 361-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299662

Of the 460 revisions included for study, 276 (60%) cases cited a specific "technical cause of failure." Femoral tunnel malposition was cited in 219 (47.6%) of 460 cases. Femoral tunnel malposition was cited as the only cause of failure in 117 cases (25.4%). Surgeons judged the femoral tunnel too vertical in 42 cases (35.9%), too anterior in 35 cases (29.9%), and too vertical and anterior in 31 cases (26.5%). Revision reconstruction involved the drilling of an entirely new femoral tunnel in 91 cases (82.1%). For primary reconstruction, autograft tissue was used in 82 cases (70.1%). For revision reconstruction, autograft tissue was used in 61 cases (52.1%) and allograft tissue in 56 cases (47.9%). Femoral tunnel malposition in primary ACL reconstruction was the most commonly cited reason for graft failure in this cohort. Graft selection is widely variable among surgeons.

Page 16: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Getgood, A., & Spalding, T. (2012). The evolution of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Open Orthop J, 6, 287-294. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010287

Page 17: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

MoChen, J. L., Allen, C. R., Stephens, T. E., Haas, A. K., Huston, L. J., Wright, R. W., . . . Multicenter, A. C. L. R. S. G. (2013). Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med, 41(7), 1571-1578. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487980

• RESULTS: A total of 1200 patients

• The most common cause of reruptures was a traumatic, noncontact ACL graft injury in 55%

• 25% of patients had a nontraumatic, gradual-onset recurrent injury, and

• 11% had a traumatic, contact injury.

Page 18: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Getgood, A., & Spalding, T. (2012). The evolution of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Open Orthop J, 6, 287-294. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010287

Page 19: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Getgood, A., & Spalding, T. (2012). The evolution of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Open Orthop J, 6, 287-294. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010287

Page 20: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Illingworth, KD, et. Al., Fu, “A Simple Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Position: The Inclination Angle and Femoral Tunnel Angle,” Am. J. Sports Med 39:12 (December, 2011), pp. 2611-2618.

Page 21: Revision ACL Reconstruction - A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Ahn, J. H., et al (2013). 3-D reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of TT and 2-incision TTI techniques. Clin Orthop Surg, 5(1), 26-35.